User talk:Interfase

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lavash. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. I would strongly suggest you to desist from such sneaky edit you made at Lavash, trying to mislead our readers about what the source says. The cited source says "Armenian bread", not "in Armenia". Your pro Azeri POV pushing has not gone unnoticed, just to let you know about that. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read carefully what the source says[14]: 3. Inscribes Lavash, the preparation, meaning and appearance of traditional bread as an expression of culture in Armenia on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity; "Armenian bread" term was nominated by Armenia, but UNESCO decided to inscribe not "Armenian bread", but "in Armenia". And be a little bit polite. Your behaviour on my talk page is a violation of

WP:CIVIL. And also visit the page of Lavash from nomination of Armenia. Do you see their big black letters "traditional bread as an expression of culture in Armenia", not any "Armenian bread"? --Interfase (talk) 18:22, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

First off, i don't see any violation of

WP:CIVIL in my above comment. Second, i also see the first paragraph, where it's said "Takes note that Armenia has nominated Lavash, the preparation, meaning and appearance of traditional Armenian bread as an expression of culture". Anyway, i won't revert your edit, but you need to know that many of your recent edits on Lavash sound disruptive and have been reverted by me and other editors.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

"where it's said "Takes note that Armenia has nominated Lavash" - yes, Armenia has nominated Lavash as an "Armenian bread", but UNESCO inscribed it not as an "Armenian bread", but just "traditional bread"... "in Armenia" (and did right, because lavash is not only Armenain bread, it is traditional bread in Azeri, Turkish, Iranian cuisines as well). My edits were constructive, but many reverts of my edits by some users sound disruptive, as I see. And blaiming others in vandalism and POV pushing, when they write according to sources, is the violation of WP:CIVIL. That is why I wrote you read carefully before reverting and blaiming. --Interfase (talk) 19:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lavash may well be a traditional bread in all the Middle East, but The cited sources in the article support only two countries for its place of origin : Armenia and/or Iran, not Azerbaijan or Turkey. Trying to hide this like you did is disruptive and has been legitimately reverted. Regards.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no common view which country is the place of origin of Lavash. Some sources says Armenia, some says - Iran, some - just Middle East. For neutral POV it should be written Middle East in the main template, neither Armenai nor Iran as it is disputable. I did not hide the information about the versions about Armania and Iran from the article (they were still in the text), I just replaced them in template by neutral "Middle East". But your removing of Azerbaijani description of lavash and the UNESCO template with the state parties of Azerbaijan, Iran, Turkey etc. was actually disruptive. But the point is that lavash today is not just "Armenian bread" and it is not correct to call lavash so. That is why UNESCO did not inscribe lavash in its list like that, and did right. --Interfase (talk) 05:05, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be an experienced editor but you sound like a newbie. You cannot ignore that Wikipedia goes with what the mainstream of reliable sources claim, not with what some few random sources claim. The mainstream of sources obviously support an Armenian or an Iranian origin of the bread, not Azerbaijani or Turkish.

Do not add Middle-east or rise any concern about the geographical origin of lavash again, except if you can provide many reliable sources for that, otherwise i will have no other choice but to file a report at ANI. If UNESCO did not register that bread as "Armenian", this is because it may also be Iranian, but not from Turkey or any other country.

Second, when one editor (you) engages in a dispute against several others, then that single editor cannot accuse the others of being disruptive, any admin would tell you the same stuff ...---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UNESCO did not register that bread as "Armenian" because it is not only Iranian, but Azerbaijani or Turkish as well. As you can see UNESCO later added lavash under not only Iran's name but under Azerbaijan's and Turkey's names as well (see here). And single editor of course can accuse the others of being disruptive if their edits are disruptive. In Wikipedia it happens often. By the way, there are only two sources in article supporting Armenian origin of lavash and two sources supporting Iranian origin. Doesn't look like a mainstream. But I never said that lavash may have Azerbaijani or Turkish origin, but it is a fact that this bread is traditional for Azerbaijani and Turkish cuisines as well. --Interfase (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, there are 3 sources for an Armenian origin and also 3 sources for an Iranian origin. Also your above statement "there are only two sources in article supporting Armenian origin of lavash and two sources supporting Iranian origin. Doesn't look like a mainstream" is baseless, no need to cite all the sources supporting an Armenian or an Iranian origin to represent the mainstream of sources, there are, as you should know, other ways to find this out. I agree that lavash is used in Azerbaijani and Turkish cuisines, this does not make lavash Azeri or Turkish. Hamburgers are part or the US cuisine it doesn't mean that hamburgers are of American origin. The problem is that you tried to change the country of origin of the bread, not only the UNESCO inscription, this is disruptive and has been legitimately reverted. A look at your talk shows that you have been indefinitely topic banned in 2014 from any Azerbaijan-related topic, is this ban still active ? If so, this would mean that you violated an administrative decision. Even so, i don't intend to report you for that possible violation, but i strongly suggest you to stop POV pushing on Azerbaijani-related topics.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:01, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source "Food Cultures of the World Encyclopedia" just says that "lavash, a traditional flatbread of Armenia", not originated from Armenia. The source "Encyclopedia of Jewish Food" says that the origin of lavash is Middle East, not Iran (somebody misused those sources). So, there are just 2 sources for an Armenian origin and also 2 sources for an Iranian origin. And hamburgers can be a part or the US cuisine, but it is not traditional part of US cuisine, like lavash is traditional bread in Azerbaijani or Turkish cuisines. That is why lavash is inscribed in UNESCO also under Azerbaijan's and Turkey's names. And topic ban is no longer active, I can make edits in Azerbaijan-related topics. Also this topic ban was not for all Azerbaijan-related topics, just topics related to the conflict with Armenia and similar geopolitical/ethnic disputes, lavash is not such topic. --Interfase (talk) 20:19, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The history section and infoboxes of the article are just fine now, per

WP:DUE. Also, source number 20 claims that the encyclopedia of jewish food supports sn Iranian origin for the bread, maybe this is said elsewhere than on page 355. Anyway, i think we're done here. Regards.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Do not violate Wikipedia:Civility. --Interfase (talk) 20:26, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Im not violating the Civility at the WP. If you feeled my template caused you a nuisance, I apologice. But your 2 reverts on my contribution without a reasonable reason were the cause of this.Mr.User200 (talk) 20:55, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not, you did. Becasue while reverting I have provided reasonable argument.Interfase (talk) 21:46, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Interfase. I was trying to add etnicity of Iranian Azerbaijanis from the page of List of Iranians Azerbaijanis. But user 'History of Iran' said that it is not correct, because of

Hi. There is no any difference. You can also remove ethnicity from other pages according to the rules of Wikipedia. Interfase (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Chovgan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please be informed that I reverted falsification, because according to the source that in article after that statement this game "is played in Azerbaijan, Iran, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan" and there is no any "other regions in the Iranian cultural sphere". Interfase (talk) 10:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When one clicks on the link, the said source is not available for verification.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[15]: "Древняя игра човган была широко распространена у азиатских народов. Одна из ее разновидностей широко культивировалась и в Азербайджане... Човган имеет распространение также у таджиков и узбеков." Interfase (talk) 16:50, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 18:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salam. Lütfən vaxtınız olduqda Qarabağ FK məqaləsində, klubun tarixinə aid olmayan və məqalədə yersiz olan bu dəyişikliklərə fikir bildirərsiz. Hörmətlə.--Nicat49 (talk) 00:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Bust of Thor Heyerdahl in Kish village of Azerbaijan.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid FOP-USonly, this is not an architectural work. Unused.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 15:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salam. Bakı məqaləsindəki son dəyişikliklərdə istifadə olunan mənbələr və s nə dərəcə mötəbərdi ? Hörmətlə.--Nicat49 (talk) 06:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salam. Arakhchin məqaləsində erməni qızı kimi istifadə olunan şəkil, 2007-ci ildə commonsa azərbaycanlı qız kimi yüklənib və Azərbaycanla bağlı bir çox önəmli məqalələrdə istifadə olunur. Erməni versiyasının mənbəsi bir qədər qaranlıqdı, ancaq azərbaycanlı versiyasının mənbəsi I Pyotr adına Rusiya Elmlər Akademiyasının antropologiya və etnoqrafiya muzeyinin saytıdır. Bu barədə nə düşünürsüz ? Hörmətlə.--Nicat49 (talk) 01:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Azərbaycanlı versiyasının üzərinə fikir versəz - "Бакинская татарка" yazısını oxuya bilərsiz. Buradan da şəkil və müəllifi barəsində ətraflı məlumat əldə edə bilərsiz.--Nicat49 (talk) 01:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bakihanov's Memorial in Baku.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:21, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Azerbaijan horse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nonsensical title, content is a fork of karapakh house, largely unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 12:38, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salam Interfase. Hazıda Gunay Mammadzada məqaləsi burada yaxşı məqaləyə namizəddir. Mən məqaləyə bəzi məlumatlar əlavə edəcəm, lakin etməmişdən qabaq tərcümə kontrolunu etməyinizi rica edirəm. Lütfən yanlışlıqları korrektə edərsiz:

1) Oyun tərzini görüşün gedişinə uyğun seçir. Günayın şahmat taxtasında ən çox sevdiyi fiqurlar at və vəzirdir. O, bu fiqurları şahmat taxtasında özünün "əsas silahları" sayır.

2) Qadınlardan ibarət şahmat üzrə Azərbaycan yığmasının kapitanı Fikrət Sideifzadə 2017-ci ildə verdiyi müsahibədə bildirib ki, "Günay yaxşı debüt biliklərinə və möhkəm sinir sisteminə malikdir."

3) Məmmədzadə Bakı şəhərində yerləşən 6 nömrəli "İntellekt" məktəb-liseyinin şagirdi olub. O, hazırda Azərbaycan Dövlət Bədən Tərbiyəsi və İdman Akademiyasında təhsil alır.

1) She chooses her playstyle in accordance to the game process. Gunay's favourite chess pieces are knight and queen. She considers these pieces as her "main weapons".

2) The captain of the women's team Azerbaijan Fikrat Sideifzadeh told in 2017 that "Gunay has nice debut knowledge and strong patience".

3) Mammadzadeh studied at "Intelligence" School Lyceum No. 6 in Baku. She currently studies in Azerbaijan State Physical Culture and Sports Academy.

Hörmətlə.--Nicat49 (talk) 14:11, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salam. İkinci cümləni bir az dəqiqləşdirərdim: "According to Azerbaijan women's team's captain Fikrat Sideifzadeh, "Gunay has a nice debut knowledge and strong patience"". Interfase (talk) 15:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear colleagues, @

İngilislərə müraciət etdim amma buradakı müzakirədə sizlərdən köməklik istəməyimi məsləhət gördülər. Sizlərdən xahişimi edirəm ki, məsələ ilə əlaqədar öz köməyinizi və dəstəyinizi Əsirgəməyəsiniz, Zəhmət Olmasa dekaktələrinizi edin mənbə çoxdur / buyurun

1. European Union
2. MOROCCO FOODEX, Food Export Control and Coordination organization
3. United States Agency for International Development

en news, tr news, ru news, books. Əvvəlçədən təşəkkürlər.

Hörmətlə: Elşad İman --Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 19:10, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salam. Lütfən imkan olduqda bu istifadəçinin fəaliyyətinə diqqət edərsiz. Müzakirəsiz və əsassız şəkildə kütləvi silmələr həyata keçirir. Hörmətlə--Nicat49 (talk) 19:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interfase, you have breached the Wikipedia:Canvassing guidelines in your [16] discussion involving a huge number of fellow editors. Instead of reverting my edits, delete your illicit act or I will report you. Regards Adelphopolis (talk) 20:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring in

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Baku. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 10:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision and for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule in an area subject to discretionary sanctions on the page Uzundara, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:09, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Hi,

The article No moles left in Irevan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG and NSONG, the sources (respectively) mention the song passingly in a list and two inaccessible sources about a translation. One removed source contained extremely biased and false information and thus deemed unreliable. As such, the article doesn't satisfy GNG and NSONG standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Interface, I am doing research on the Aras Dam Project and I wanted to ask, do you know how to get in touch with the family of Vasif Dadashev?

ThanksSherahzad (talk) 00:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

== April 2023 == You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC) == Introduction to contentious topics ==[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to

contentious

. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

KhndzorUtogh (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at

The following sanction now applies to you:

indefinitely

topic banned

from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and related ethnic conflicts indefinitely topic banned from pages about Armenia, Azerbaijan, and related ethnic conflicts, broadly construed

You have been sanctioned per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1152896007#Interfase

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Galobtter (talk) 23:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @Galobtter: Can I still create or edit articles or topics that are not related to Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, e.g. about Azerbaijani scientists, actors or sportspeople? Interfase (talk) 00:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Since topic bans are broadly construed, no. Galobtter (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  For the avoidance of doubt, I've updated the topic ban wording to match that used by ArbCom in

  WP:AA3. Galobtter (talk) 01:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  • @Galobtter: So what can I do to be free from this topic ban in future? Because periodically I edit and create articles on Azerbaijani topic that are not related to any conflict. --Interfase (talk) 01:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Your options for appeal are given here. You can ask for the topic ban to be narrowed in a way that allows you to do those edits. Galobtter (talk) 01:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

These my edits are constructive and showing that there cannot be further problems or conflicts editing such topics and they can be used as an examples for good faith and good behavior from my side. Also see

WP:HAR. Interfase (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

You have violated your topic ban numerous times, period. Moreover, when you asked if you can edit about other areas aside from AA conflicts (literally in this same thread), it was explicitly explained that your can’t, but you still proceeded to violate your tban. And the fact that you’re saying “see WP:HAR” for me merely pointing out your numerous tban violations is just blatant casting of

WP:ASPERSIONS. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 18:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:IGNORE says that if a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it. So, I ignored my tban in those particular cases just to improve Wikipedia and to show that my edits on those topics can be constructive. Can you show any example on those edits that are not constructive, but destructive? From your side I see just WP:HAR against me. So, let's improve Wikipedia together without persecuting each other. Agree? --Interfase (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@Galobtter:, can I kindly ask you to narrow this topic ban to let me edit articles not related to Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict? --Interfase (talk) 18:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interfase, if you want your topic ban to be changed, you need to actually follow it. @

WP:AE any violations you see. Galobtter (talk) 16:24, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Maria Clara Pacheco
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Interfase! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article,

Draft:Maria Clara Pacheco

Hello, Interfase. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Maria Clara Pacheco

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Interfase,

Can you share your image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Heydar_Aliyev_Cultural_Center.jpg for Polish Wikipedia. I can't add it because it is not in Wikimedia Commons and is blocked for use in non English Wikipedias.

I will appreciate it. Zbyszek.michalak (talk) 19:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Zbyszek.michalak:  Done Interfase (talk) 09:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tank you :-) Zbyszek.michalak (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sayyad Dadashov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayyad Dadashov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shirzad Abdullayev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirzad Abdullayev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Redivy (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]