User talk:Iune/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

2018 Pacific hurricane season listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2018 Pacific hurricane season. Since you had some involvement with the 2018 Pacific hurricane season redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

2003-04 SPAC

Can you finish off dealing with the comments - ive started writing something for the lead here, but i am goning to be rather busy over the next few days with Phet. Ill be around on IRC if you need me though :)Jason Rees (talk) 18:28, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

    • Sorry i missed you on IRC - in response to whether extratropical cyclone Heta should be capitalized i would think not but im not sure.Jason Rees (talk) 16:44, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

autoconfirmed
to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here
.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 1989-90 South Pacific cyclone season

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk
) 20:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Ive checked the article over and made several edits - ill go through it though tomorrow more throughly with a fresh pair of eyes. BTW i saw your DYK Hook and i think you probably barking up the wrong tree with that particular hook as i have a feeling that the Apia Cyclone of 1889 caused more damage. Try going with Ofa was one of the two most intense cyclones to make landfall on Samoa in the C20 which is true as Ron didnt make landfall on Samoa AFAIK. Anyway ill leave it up to you :) Jason Rees (talk) 02:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

FYI

If youre planning to do a timeline for the 88-89 SPAC TC season then you need to be aware that it was the first season that nadi monitored the area between 140W to 120W.Jason Rees (talk) 01:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

In fact im gonna do it - but feel free to chip in.:) Jason Rees (talk) 02:04, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Whats up?Jason Rees (talk) 21:08, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Aus

Thanks for creating an article for the upcoming Aus season, I hope you dont mind but i merged your version to the one i quickly created the other day. Which is in the correct place if ive missed something feel free to add it.Jason Rees (talk) 23:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Cite drop down menu

Hi, The cite drop down menu doesn't appear on my edit toolbar. How do I get it to appear? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby122 (talkcontribs) 22:20, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

It's ok I found out what was wrong. Thanks for informing me of the issue with my article!--Bobby122 Contact Me 22:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Did you mean to do this?

Hi Anhamirak, this edit effectively froze my nomination. Is this what you intended to do? Crum375 (talk) 04:28, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

USAir Flight 405

I believe it was a few days ago that you did a GA review of USAir_Flight_405. The author was concerned that you did not provide any feedback through the GA process to give guidance for further improvements so they requested a peer review to get some feedback. I reviewed the article and found a number of items that under the GA criteria I would not have passed (reconsider GA criteria sections 1.a and 2.a). You can see my comments here Wikipedia:Peer_review#USAir_Flight_405. The writer is already making the changes and I think the article will indeed be a GA. I just wanted you to reconsider giving an article GA status in the future when it may still need additional elements of improvement according to the GA criteria. Thanks for your contributions. § Music Sorter § (talk) 15:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Category three hurricane tracks

Hi, is it possible for you to make an image of the tracks of all category 3 hurricanes? Just the ones that have reached category 3 status, but not the ones that have gone higher than a 3. Thank you, Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 17:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Cygwin help

Hi, I have reached the step when you have to go to the tracks directory and compile it by running

./autogen.sh && make

Can you tell me how to do this step as I get an error in my tracks directory when cygwin starts to check whether I am cross compiling. Thank you, Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 23:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Track map stuff

Hi. Since you are listed as active on

cool stuff
) 23:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Mostly, when people post requests, if nobody else has done them, just run them in the track generator and upload the result to Commons. You may also want to watch the requests page.
cool stuff
) 00:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
BTW can u add the Nadi BT to this Please since the JTWC doesnt show the ET points on Sina and Lisa. Ive enclosed the points below. Thanks Jason Rees (talk) 15:53, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
ThanksJason Rees (talk) 17:12, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Namu

Since you enjoy doing tracks so much: Can u do us a trackmap for Cyclone Namu (33P). Theres a problem that theirs no JTWC ATCF File so ive taken the track below from the Neumann files. Dr Charles Neumann in 2000 under a US Navy contract went through and analyzed the JTWC BT so the BT below should be fine to be used. If you do the track can you please chuck it in my sandbox for Namu.Jason Rees (talk) 01:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Track Map Generator

I dont have a track map generator.

talk
) 08:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

89-90 SPAC

Just as an FYI - i found some of the TCRs written up by Nadi for that season last night via the met office. Ive added the systems in to the timeline with generic statements for now as i may be able to go down to Exeter and get them.Jason Rees (talk) 14:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Reunion BT

Best Track, Op Jason Rees (talk) 00:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

--Sweet xxTalk

09:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Armbrust Talk Contribs

13:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Happy birthday. Jason Rees (talk) 17:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

RE:Hello...

i didnt know that there was a log for it... so i kept on posting such things. Thank you for informing me..

talk
) 12:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Tracks

Me and CB were talking last night about the PTS tracking data page and we feel it would be better for everyone if we just did in the original format (ie not 360- XXXX). So instead of just copying MINDULLE's stuff across can u copy it all. Thanks.Jason Rees (talk) 03:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Domeng

Hope this helps - there are several JTWC files covering the period and it seems to have been relocated quite a bit on one occasion--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 17:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-05 1845Z

  • 96W INVEST 100805 1200 17.3N 131.2E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100805 0600 17.3N 131.6E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100805 0000 17.3N 132.1E WPAC 15 1010

Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-05 0645Z

  • 96W INVEST 100805 0000 17.0N 129.4E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100804 1800 17.0N 129.6E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100804 1200 17.0N 129.9E WPAC 15 1010

Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-04 2245Z

  • 96W INVEST 100804 1200 17.0N 129.9E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100804 0600 16.9N 130.2E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100804 0000 16.8N 130.5E WPAC 15 1010

Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-04 0645Z

  • 96W INVEST 100804 0000 18.9N 132.6E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100803 1800 17.4N 133.5E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100803 1200 15.7N 134.3E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100803 0600 13.5N 135.1E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100803 0000 11.3N 135.9E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100802 1800 10.6N 136.3E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100802 1200 10.4N 137.0E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100802 0600 10.0N 137.6E WPAC 15 1010
  • 96W INVEST 100802 0000 9.5N 138.5E WPAC 15 1010

Can you do me a favor?

Is there a possible way for you to come to the IRC whenever you can? I wanna discuss with you about the new infobox and the changes that could be made. I just thought it may be easier there instead of here since I have many questions and suggestions that would be way too much to say here. Darren23Edits|Mail 21:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Renaming

Please make sure you logout of your old account and login to your new one so you don't get accused of sockpuppeting or mess up the transfer of your edits. ···

Join WikiProject Japan
! 19:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

JMA TDs

I was talking to JR on the IRC about JMA TDs, and he said talk to you. So... I was thinking, the JMA TDs should be numbered by the invest number. If another depression occurs with the same invest number, just as is with multiple "Tropical Depression"s I guess Wikipedia numbers them for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Pacific_typhoon_season#Tropical_Depression_7. You could add 2, 3, etc,.

) 22:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Well, JMA doesn't at all, and I think it'd make them more distinguishable. ) 23:12, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Telugu?

are you really from Andhra Pradesh and can you really speak Telugu?

talk
) 06:10, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

wow! because i live in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. However, i was born in Hyderabad. I can speak Telugu, as it is my official language, i cant read it or even write. Where do you really live now?
talk
) 09:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

SPAC

Ive tracked down most of the systems for 1998-99 using Gary's Summaries. i have currently got no clue about 24 & 25F. Maybe its an early example of Nadi shoving in systems but not warning on it like 12F this year which i am 99.9% sure was the CPAC-SPAC Crossover (90C) in Feb as the dates match.Jason Rees (talk) 13:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Can you combine the track maps for Wasa and Arthur 1991 please, i ask as they were considered the same cyclone by Nadi in BT.Jason Rees (talk) 23:25, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

The WikiProject Tropical Cyclones Newsletter #31

Iune hid this message as it broke their talk page templates.Iune(talk) 23:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Aus

You did a track map the other day of the Australian warning centers AOR's. Where is it as i think i have the perfect place to put. Sorry forgot to sign.Jason Rees (talk) 22:43, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Non-free
files in your user space

talk page
.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I was alerted to

WP:MFD if you wish to seek broader community consensus. Regards, Strange Passerby (talkcstatus
) 15:34, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Seems fair to me, thanks for taking my concerns into consideration. Strange Passerby (talkcstatus) 16:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

The WikiProject Tropical Cyclones Newsletter#32B

Number 32B, October 20, 2010

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of

October 2010

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Storm of the month
'

Typhoon Fanapi
' is Storm of the Month

Typhoon Fanapi approaching Taiwan

Early on September 14, the JMA reported that a tropical depression had formed east of Taiwan. The Joint Typhoon Warning Center soon designated the depression as 12W with PAGASA naming it Inday shortly thereafter. Later on the same day, the tropical depression was upgraded to a tropical storm and was officially given the name Fanapi by the JMA. On September 16, the storm further intensified into a severe tropical storm. That same day, the JMA further upgraded it into a typhoon. Fanapi turned west and intensified into a category 1 typhoon that night. On the following day, the storm further intensified into a category 2 typhoon. On September 18, the storm further intensified to a Category 3 typhoon and moved straight into Taiwan. It made landfall in Hualien County at 8:40 a.m. (10.40am AEST) on September 19, with winds of 162 kilometres (101 mi) and across the island at a speed of 20km/h. Shortly after its landfall, it moved south and again turned east and rapidly weakened into a Severe Tropical Storm. It had a Category 1 equivalent strength at that time. At 06:00 PM (Local time), the typhoon went back into the ocean. Post Storm Analysis proved that the system stayed on land for 9 hours approximately. The storm made its second landfall at Zhangpu County, Zhangzhou, Fujian province, China, at a Category 1 Typhoon intensity. The Storm caused a large scale damage to Taiwan. In the early hours of September 21, Fanapi weakened into a tropical depression over Guangdong province, China. On Septemner 22, Fanapi dissipated completely.

New members

Articles Requiring Help

Member of the month

Cyclone barnstar
Cyclone barnstar

Jason Rees is the member of the month - October 2010

Jason is been awarded the member of the month - October 2010 for his excellent work at the construction of Tropical cyclone related articles. He is excellent when it comes to referencing. His work at the article
Typhoon Fanapi (2010)
is remarkable.

To do

  • Improve the 14 WPTC core articles to FA status
  • Finish List of Pacific typhoon seasons
  • Expand every season article worldwide to mention every storm in the season
  • Expand the articles in Category:Tropical cyclone articles to be expanded
  • Get every article on the vital articles list to GA status

Storm article statistics


Project News

  • The 2011 Northern Hemisphere cyclone season articles are awaiting creation.
  • A replacement for Template:Infobox hurricane current has been discussed.
  • Hurricane Earl (2010) dab issue solved.
  • List of tornadoes spawned by Hurricane Earl (1998) being discussed for deletion.
  • Flattening MODIS real time images discussed.
  • List of Tropical Storms David, Hurricane Humberto, Tropical Storm Alex discussed.
  • NASA GRIP (Genesis and Rapid Intensification Project) explained.
  • Book:Greatest Category 5 Hurricanes, which is related to this project, has been nominated for deletion.
  • Early hurricane season names brought up a large discussion.
  • Format for season articles discussed
  • Use of colour in charts on season articles duscussed
  • new map icon discussed
  • Lists on Cyclones, Hurricanes, and Typhoons discussed
  • several of our SWIO categories have been nominated for CFD
  • moving of storm articles and the year in retired storm articles decided
  • Storm Article titles discussed

--

talk
) 10:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Indian Ocean 2010

Current storms excluded

     05/15/2010 M=10  0 SNBR=0000 LAILA       XING=0
     05/15L 63 932  15 1010L 64 929  15 1010L 66 924  15 1010L 68 919  15 1010*
     05/16L 71 913  15 1010L 81 906  15 1010L 91 901  15 1010L 99 896  15 1009*
     05/17L106 890  20 1007*111 885  25 1004*115 878  30 1000*116 870  35  996*
     05/18*119 859  35  996*124 846  40  993*130 834  50  985*132 827  55  982*
     05/19*134 819  65  974*137 815  65  974*140 814  65  974*145 812  60  978*
     05/20*150 808  60  978*154 806  50  985*155 806  50  985*158 805  60  978*
     05/21*164 807  50  985*168 810  40  993*171 814  35  996*172 819  35  996*
     05/22*171 824  30 1000*176 832  30 1000*185 840  30 1000*189 842  30 1000*
     05/23*191 844  30 1000*193 849  30 1000*193 854  30 1000*193 861  25 1004*
     05/24*193 873  25 1004*192 888  25 1004*191 903  25 1004*188 918  25 1004*
     HR
     05/17/2010 M= 7  0 SNBR=0000 BANDU       XING=0
     05/17*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0L 92 576  20 1007*
     05/18* 96 571  25 1004*101 564  25 1004*104 558  25 1004*107 551  25 1002*
     05/19*110 545  30 1000*111 540  30 1000*113 535  35  996*115 530  35  996*
     05/20*119 527  40  993*121 526  40  993*123 525  45  989*124 523  45  989*
     05/21*125 521  40  993*126 520  55  982*126 519  55  982*126 517  50  985*
     05/22*126 515  45  989*126 513  40  993*126 511  35  996*126 507  30 1000*
     05/23*125 501  25 1004*123 495  25 1004*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*
     TS
     05/30/2010 M= 9  0 SNBR=0000 PHET        XING=0
     05/30L144 658  15 1010L144 654  15 1010L144 650  15 1010L145 647  20 1005*
     05/31*146 645  25 1004*147 643  30 1001*150 639  30 1000*154 635  35  996*
     06/01*158 632  40  993*162 628  55  982*168 623  60  978*171 615  75  967*
     06/02*174 610  90  956*178 605 110  941*182 600 125  929*184 598 120  933*
     06/03*186 596 115  937*191 595 115  937*200 595 105  944*208 592 105  944*
     06/04*215 592  90  956*223 592  75  967*230 594  65  974*236 597  55  982*
     06/05*239 603  45  989*238 610  40  993*235 616  40  993*232 624  40  993*
     06/06*229 641  40  993*235 657  35  996*246 673  30 1000*249 682  30 1000*
     06/07*267 711  30 1000*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*
     HR
     10/05/2010 M= 4  0 SNBR=0000 BOB02       XING=0
     10/05*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0*  0   0   0    0L141 872  15 1010*
     10/06L144 869  15 1010L147 866  15 1010L154 863  15 1010L160 861  15 1010*
     10/07L170 860  15 1010L181 860  15 1010L193 860  15 1010L205 868  20 1007*
     10/08*215 882  25 1000*228 898  25 1000*236 912  25 1001*237 917  25 1004*
     TD
     10/13/2010 M= 3  0 SNBR=0000 BOB03       XING=0
     10/13*  0   0   0    0*162 901  25 1004*162 897  25 1001*163 894  25 1003*
     10/14*164 891  25 1004*165 888  30 1000*167 884  30 1000*174 876  30 1000*
     10/15*181 868  30 1000*185 859  30 1000*188 850  30 1000*  0   0   0    0*
     TD

--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 09:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Infobox

When do you plan to test the current infobox you were working on in SHEM? Darren23Edits|Mail 03:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

Re:IRC

Sorry but i was rather tired last night and headed off earlier than i usually do, Im around now and i should be around this evening though.Jason Rees (talk) 16:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

I've been revamping this article over the past two days and I think it's ready for FLC. You contributed to the revamping too (with more edits than I made, albeit over a year ago); do you want credit too? --Dylan620 (tc) 17:02, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

--Dylan620 (tc) 04:21, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

1977 Oman cyclone's track

thankz very much for the track of the storm.. :) ..HunterZone (talk) 17:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. FunPika 21:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

You will have received an email saying that the account is approved and also suspended; when you confirm by replying here it will be unsuspended. Stifle (talk) 10:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

Too soon for Omeka

Wait until the advisory comes out before updating the pages, just in case. The system is still technically west of the International Dateline and out of CPHC's hands. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

Hurricane Tico (1983)

[1] - I just wanted to say, I love the new image in that article! Great find. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

Welcome to the 2011
WikiCup
!

Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found

WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17
12:55, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

04-05 Aus

Come (back) onto IRC at some point bar Wednesday and ill tell ya what i think.Jason Rees (talk) 01:47, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Re:A Question Regarding Wikicup 2011

Yep, that's fine; there's clearly been significant work on the article by you this year. J Milburn (talk) 23:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

To Wikipedia's 10th birthday

Cheers! --Dylan620 (tcr) 18:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors

Hi! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the

Online Ambassador
. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

WikiCup 2011 January newsletter

We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to The Bushranger (submissions), who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions), with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to Greece Yellow Evan (submissions), who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for Talk:Hurricane King/GA1, Principality of Sealand Miyagawa (submissions), who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for Dognapping, and United Kingdom Jarry1250 (submissions) who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (explanation), claiming for Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!

A running total of claims can be seen

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17
22:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

Hello Iune. I've taken the liberty of relisting the FLC as it really seemed to miss out on any real attention. If I were you, I'd ask for some reviews from the folks at the various wikiprojects who may be interested. Thanks for your patience, and diligence, and good luck. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

Rona/Frank review

Hey, I started the review for Rona-Frank. You have seven days, bladyblah. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk
) 07:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

Since your not feeling motivated

- BTW Ping me on IRC at some point when youve got a couple of hours to spare and ill help you forfill my concerns with the 2004-05 Aus timeline. I can also give you some pointers on how to get your GAN (Justin/Frank?) passed by Hink.Jason Rees (talk) 06:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

WikiCup 2011 February newsletter

So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to The Bushranger (submissions) (first, with 487 points) and Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions) (second, with 459), who stormed the first round. Scotland Casliber (submissions) finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to United Kingdom Jarry1250 (submissions) for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to Bavaria Stone (submissions) for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.

Some news for those who are interested- March will see

a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive
, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.

Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17
23:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

Hello!

WikiProject Estonia Hi! You have been invited to become a member of WikiProject Estonia, a WikiProject which aims to create and expand Estonia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can add your name to the participants list. Thanks! 

Pelmeen10 (talk) 01:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

WikiCup 2011 March newsletter

We are half way through round two of the WikiCup, which will end on 28 April. Of the 64 current contestants, 32 will make it through to the next round; the two highest in each pool, and the 16 next highest scorers. At the time of writing, our current overall leader is Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions) with 231 points, who leads Pool H. Poland Piotrus (submissions) (Pool G) also has over 200 points, while 9 others (three of whom are in Pool D) have over 100 points. Remember that certain content (specifically, articles/portals included in at least 20 Wikipedias as of 31 December 2010 or articles which are considered "vital") is worth double points if promoted to good or featured status, or if it appears on the main page in the Did You Know column. There were some articles last round which were eligible for double points, but which were not claimed for. For more details, see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring.

A running total of claims can be seen

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17
00:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

WikiCup 2011 April newsletter

Round 2 of the

2011 WikiCup is over, and the new round will begin on 1 May. Note that any points scored in the interim (that is, for content promoted or reviews completed on 29-30 April) can be claimed in the next round, but please do not start updating your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. Fewer than a quarter of our original contestants remain; 32 enter round 3, and, in two months' time, only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. Scotland Casliber (submissions
), who led Pool F, was our round champion, with 411 points, while 7 contestants scored between 200 and 300 points. At the other end of the scale, a score of 41 was high enough to reach round 3; more than five times the score required to reach round 2, and competition will no doubt become tighter now we're approaching the later rounds. Those progressing to round 3 were spread fairly evenly across the pools; 4 progressed from each of pools A, B, E and H, while 3 progressed from both pools C and F. Pools D and G were the most successful; each had 5 contestants advancing.

This round saw our first good topic points this year; congratulations to

In The News
. For this reason, working on more unusual content could be even more rewarding than usual!

Sorry this newsletter is going out a little earlier than expected- there is a busy weekend coming up! A running total of claims can be seen

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17
19:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

WikiCup 2011 May newsletter

We're half way through round 3 of the

featured article candidates
: if you are nominating content for which you intend to claim WikiCup points, please make this clear in the nomination statement so that the FAC director and his delegates are aware of the fact.

A running total of claims can be seen

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17
23:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

Re:1965 PHS

Ok, I will ask you for permission next time. Sorry.

Tropical
Cyclone 16:04, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

Tracks

Can you redo the 95-96 SPAC seasonal track map and remove the extratropical cyclones from it. Thanks.Jason Rees (talk) 23:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks and no worries. Enjoy your holiday to India, though you must be regretting it as Ma-on "should" become a Cat 5 with a pressure under 900 within 72 hrs.Jason Rees (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

WikiCup 2011 June newsletter

We are half way through 2011, and entering the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; the semi-finals are upon us! Points scored in the interim (29/30 June) may be counted towards next round, but please do not update your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. 16 contestants remain, and all have shown dedication to the project to reach this far. Our round leader was Scotland Casliber (submissions) who, among other things, successfully passed three articles through featured article candidates and claimed an impressive 29 articles at Did You Know, scoring 555 points. Casliber led pool D. Pool A was led by Ohio Wizardman (submissions), claiming points for a featured article, a featured list and seven good article reviews, while pool C was led by Norway Eisfbnore (submissions), who claimed for two good articles, ten articles at Did You Know and four good article reviews. They scored 154 and 118 respectively. Pool B was by far our most competitive pool; six of the eight competitors made it through to round 4, with all of them scoring over 100 points. The pool was led by Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions), who claimed for, among other things, three featured articles and five good articles. In addition to the four pool leaders, 12 others (the four second places, and the 8 next highest overall) make up our final 16. The lowest scorer who reached round 4 scored 76 points; a significant increase on the 41 needed to reach round 3. Eight of our semi-finalists scored at least twice as much as this.

No points were awarded this round for featured pictures, good topics or In the News, and no points have been awarded in the whole competition for featured topics, featured portals or featured sounds. Instead, the highest percentage of points has come from good articles. Featured articles, despite their high point cost, are low in number, and so, overall, share a comparable number of points with Did You Know, which are high in number but low in cost. A comparatively small but still considerable number of points come from featured lists and good article reviews, rounding out this round's overall scores.

We would again like to thank

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews
. Please do keep using it, and please do help by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup.

Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here, for those interested, though it appears that neither are completely accurate at this time. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

WikiCup 2011 July newsletter

We are half way through the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; there is less than a month to go before we have our final 8. Our pool leaders are

)). Points for Did You Know and good article reviews round out the scoring. No points have been awarded for In the News, good topics or featured pictures this round, and no points for featured sounds or portals have been awarded in the entire competition. On an unrelated note, preparation will be beginning soon for next year's WikiCup- watch this space!

There is little else to be said beyond the usual. Please list anything you need reviewing on

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, so others following the WikiCup can help, and please do help if you can by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup- points are, of course, offered for reviews at GAC. Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17
11:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

WikiProject Eurovision is currently suffering from inactivity, despite having a large number of active users as project members. It is recommended that you add the project talk page to your watchlist if you have not already done so, since there are a number of proposals on this talk page which will significantly impact on the project that should be of interest to you.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

The Signpost: 22 August 2011