User talk:LivinAWestLife

Hello LivinAWestLife,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fractal (EDM Artist) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 15:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fractal (EDM Artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fractal (EDM Artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 12:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Monstercat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 09:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LivinAWestLife, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. 2601:589:8000:2ED0:1CFD:A2E8:8DDB:FF0F (talk) 15:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fractal (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fractal (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk _YO! 20:59, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The correct place to appeal a deletion is Wikipedia:Deletion review, not the talk page of the deleted article. All talk pages that have no corresponding article will be speedy deleted so it's unlikely that any meaningful discussion will take place there. Sarahj2107 (talk) 06:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Au5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Exists as Au5

Under the

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Thanks for creating List of tallest buildings in North America! I edit here too, under the username FULBERT and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that

Helpful list of these structures, and well-referenced.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 12:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of tallest buildings in the United States into List of tallest buildings in North America. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Boulder, Colorado has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Aegean Sea. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, a GA nomination should be started by a major contributor to the article. And from a look, you do not appear in the top editors here, and Philadelphia is nowhere to be found in your top pages edited here. Please consult one of these people before nominating an article. You could also ask for a peer review to find things to fix. Cheers! NightBag10 ^(talk) 13:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have a feeling that you don't like templated messages, so I'll just say this in my own words. Regarding recent edits you made to

However, before you ask about the artists section, I'll just say that the Monstercat website is the only verifiable source we have for most artists' inclusion until something else in the current year comes out.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 19:20, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

The article Battle of Fredericksburg you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Battle of Fredericksburg for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of OCL97 -- OCL97 (talk) 01:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

The article Philadelphia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Philadelphia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of OCL97 -- OCL97 (talk) 02:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lei Yue Mun Plaza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LivinAWestLife, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.
  non-free content criteria
  in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 11:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Never Say Die are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

There is no mention of the record company on Dubstep, so it is not a good link for this subject. However, I did notice that quite a few articles mention Never Say Die Records, so I chose one which mentions the record company many times (Eptic) and added it. Feel free to change Eptic for something else, but please make sure that it mentions Never Say Die Records. Leschnei (talk) 13:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I moved it up with the other non-song, non-album music entries. Single-entry sections clutter up the page and make it harder for readers to quickly scan for their article of interest (in my opinion). Leschnei (talk) 13:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I know this thread is old, but I just wanted to inform you that the article, that you are referencing, Never Say Die Records has just been approved. And have already included it in the disambiguation page: Never Say Die.

You're welcome to contribute on Never Say Die Records. Leewilliam236 (talk) 03:46, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey LivinAWestLife! This is A Chicagoan from SSC. It's nice to see you here, I was just checking out the skyscraper WikiProject, since KillerZavatar mentioned in a thread about the new CTBUH site that we could collaborate to improve Wikipedia. Kestreltail (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha, Nevada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, LivinAWestLife. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 02:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for creating the 55 Bishopsgate article. However, for consistency we use AGL height on Wikipedia, not AOD. In the article you have given the AOD height of 284 metres, which is as per source but it would be better if a source could be found for the AGL height. Going by either AGL or AOD height it will not be the tallest building in the City of London, unless you are mixing AGL and AOD heights. It also does not say it will be tallest in the City in any of the sources. QuintusPetillius (talk) 20:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will correct that soon. I’ve heard much the same on SkyscraperCity but I couldn’t find a source that used the AGL height. LivinAWestLife (talk) 00:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, wish you a good day as well LivinAWestLife (talk) 10:53, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

You have recently edited a page related to the

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 10:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the Zionism article is subject to a consensus required restriction, meaning that reverted additions cannot be restored without consensus. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 10:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that with your series of edits at

TarnishedPath^talk 00:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, LivinAWestLife. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at