User talk:NearEMPTiness

Welcome!

Hello, NearEMPTiness, and

. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

]

Pulsed Magnetic Welding

Great job on the William F. Brown page. I am his youngest son. I have an award he received that states he is the "Father of Pulsed Magnetic Welding". Do you have any further information on this that could be added to the page? You reference "magnetic pulse welding" in the page. Is that the correct terminology? My father always referred to it as pulsed magnetic welding as the award did. Also, did you know my father? I would like to know who you are. You can contact me via email at [email protected]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomBrownNextstate (talk • contribs) 21:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Solipsist

• 
  Brocket Hall
• 
  First digitally enhanced attempt by H&N

Happy New Year to you! I thought of you, after receiving the first entry on a little competition that I started on the German Wikipedia on digitally enhancing a problematic photograph of Brocket Hall. Following your example I have written 42 English and nearly 300 German articles by now.

Best regards

NearEMPTiness --NearEMPTiness (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stephan

A belated happy new year to you too.... sorry, I missed your post at the start of the year. I'm not editing Wikipedia that much these days, due to too many people not observing the rules or original spirit of Wikipedia.

But it is cool that you are helping to expand the German version.

Congratulations on your work on the Brocket Hall photo. The perspective correction looks particularly good.

Tschüs - Solipsist (talk) 12:46, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Solipist

Thanks for replying to my message - and indeed very timely just 3 days after my birthday. There are times when I miss Cambridgeshire, but in general the move back to Germany has its advantages as well. Walking the tightrope between deletion and getting linked on the "Did you know?" section on the main page is very entertaining for me, but I agree with you, that a lot of hot air is being blown on the discussion pages of Wikipedia. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

		The Original Barnstar
		Nice work on the Flying Merkel article. A great read. Cheers, Stalwart111 11:44, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear NearEMPTiness, thanks for your contributions to Wikpedia, especially your recent creation of Bianca Beetson. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 09:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear NearEMPTiness, In reference to your comment concerning the Jones County Courthouse (Gray,Ga.) article on Wikipedia, the short article was intentional to eliminate plagiarism (which is easy to run into as an article becomes longer in form). To compensate for the short form of the article, I inserted several links on the history of the Jones County Courthouse (Gray,Ga.) which directs the reader to more informative avenues on the subject matter and gives due credit for other people's contributions on the subject matter.[User:Eddie001999|Eddie001999]([User talk:Eddie001999|talk]) 15:52, 26 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddie001999 (talk • contribs)

]

• NearEMPTiness, it has been a week since the above notification, and there has been no response on the nomination page nor edits to the article. Please consider this a reminder that you need to take action soon to respond and address the nomination's outstanding issues. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:09, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reminder. I think the commments of the review are accurate, but I do not want to make changes to the article, due to other priorities. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if you are aware of the prior history of this article? It was originally created by User:PlanetStar, and then deleted as a copyright violation of this: [1] It appears that PlanetStar translated the English-language version of the article to German, and you have translated it back - leaving us with an article which is still closely derived from the original source, and thus possibly still a copyright violation. There are also issues with the sourcing and general appropriateness concerning articles on phobias created by PlanetStar, as discussed here [2] and here [3]. It is possible that these articles may be deleted en masse, and you may wish to comment before this happens. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AndyTheGrump: I came here to say some of the same things, except, NearEMPTiness, it appears that you also did the German translation! My curiosity was piqued when I noticed that the earliest edit imported by Xaosflux contained an English edit summary. (I'm not sure I would've checked this myself, either, because you are one of the more reliable requesters at Requests for page importation). Could you comment on what's going on? Does the German Wikipedia have similar policies about copyright violations to the English one? Graham87 03:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping Graham, I really only checked for overlapping edits, and made sure to only maintain the post-deleted enwiki edits. Note, I just restored the prior speedy-deleted talk page (Talk:Siderodromophobia) should it be relevant to this ongoing discussion. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:03, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I was not aware of the intended mass deletion of phobia articles at all, and I personally think that re-writing would be better than deleting. I fully agree to the Wikipedia principle that we should not tolerate copyright infringements. However, in the specific case of

siderodromophobia to German and then re-translating it back to English the wording has changed sufficiently that it cannot be seen as a copyright infringement anymore. I think that this version should be acceptable because the content cannot be changed further, and the author of the original is mentioned in the article. I have also added links and pictures. In summary, I do not see any reason for deleting this article. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

I start seeing the dilemma now: By importing the old English versions, which might contain copyright infringemens we have run a full circle. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Also, unauthorized translations of copyrighted works are also copyright infringements. That's why it's illegal to translate, say, a Brockhaus Enzyklopädie entry into English and post it here; if the Wikipedia entry was re-translated into German, I'm pretty sure the original publishers would not be impressed. Graham87 15:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certainly open to RevDeletion of old reversions that are copyvios brought back via the import process, will that suffice to resolve this? — xaosflux ^Talk 20:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't translate my original article to German Wikipedia as I don't know the German language. I think the reason why people are talking about this is because somebody may have copied the original siderodromophobia article to German wikipedia, then German editors edited the article to get out of copyright infringement, and then after siderodromophobia was first deleted, xaosflux recreated article through copying and translation from German. PlanetStar 00:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be fine with that, @Xaosflux:. @AndyTheGrump:, what do you think? Graham87 08:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've deleted the english language revisions that came back from dewiki via the import process (which had previously been deleted here on enwiki). If all the issues are settled now, I HIGHLY suggest this discussion be copied to Talk:Siderodromophobia. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pleas help to translate the article Frank Christoph Schnitzler from German to english. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.137.46 (talk) 05:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, but I have other priorities at the moment. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NearEMPTiness, thanks for all your work in creating this article - I've been making some minor corrections. However, there is a problem with one of the photos you uploaded, which will need to be renamed: File:The_old_explosives_magazine_building_at_Angas_Inlet_in_the_Port_River,_Port_Adelaide._State_Library_of_South_Australia,_PRG-280-1-12-37.jpeg.

The original SLSA photo caption states that it is of the explosives depot at the North Arm, so it must refer to the earlier depot at Magazine Creek. Note also that the use of "Angas Inlet" in the earlier newspaper reports is somewhat misleading - this is the waterway separating Garden Island from Torrens Island in the Port River Estuary. Barker Inlet separates the two islands from the mainland to the east, and the North Arm separates them from the mainland to the south. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 00:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your very helpful edits and the proposal for renaming the photograph. I now requested it to be moved. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:05, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig's copy violation detector seems to suggest you need to clean up a couple of sections. Just paraphrase them a bit more, throw them into a cuisinart, and we should be good to go. Let me know when you've arrived at that destination. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 7&6=thirteen: Thank you for the encouraging comments. We have made some changes and now arrived at the following values:

• http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/5083277 (which is public domain anyway) : 48.5%
• http://www.sahistorians.org.au/175/bm.doc/high-and-dry-by-the-mangroves-.pdf : 46.8% --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GTG. Nicely done.

WP: DYK should be a positive experience that makes the article and the encyclopedia better. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Dry Creek explosives depot

On 3 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dry Creek explosives depot, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a horse-drawn tram was used to move dynamite to and from the Dry Creek explosives depot? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dry Creek explosives depot. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article you recently created,

]

A page you started (Jeepomotive) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating

Jeepomotive

, NearEMPTiness!

Wikipedia editor Vibrantmatter just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice. niche piece very few historical gems on these unique vehicles. I added more context from the U.S. Army experience

To reply, leave a comment on Vibrantmatter's talk page.

Learn more about

.

]

DYK nomination of Railway of the Prince Imperial

]

Re: AfD

Hello, I've gone ahead and closed it as keep. Another admin would probably have gotten to it eventually and closed it, but I think the AFD shows a strong enough consensus for keeping the article. Graham87 05:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much and sorry for being a bit impatient on this occasion. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much sir, I appreciate your comment. I also would like to change the name of the page from "Apra (village)" to "Apra, Punjab" for better knowledge and information. I can not do it by myself as am not yet

]

Done. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 09:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, I have updated the page with more information please have a look and please let me know if there is anything i need to change. Also I appreciate if you guide me how I can enrol at

]

This place

Nice to read you here as well. Wish you a contemplative advent season. Now your user name become more transparent to me. --Symposiarch (talk) 09:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Asian Month Barnstar
	Thanks for your great contribution in Wikipedia Asian Month 2015! --AddisWang (talk) 14:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply ]

Hallo @NearEMPTiness:
dein eindrucksvolles Foto von der Maske aus Gabun beschreibst Du hier mit "from Mahongwe". Ich kann aber nirgends finden, dass das ein Ort ist. In der deutschen WP gibt es einen Artikel "Mahongwe", da ist es eine Sprache; in anderen Fundstellen im Internet wird es auch noch für ein Volk verwendet. Wegen dieser Unklarheit habe ich die Maske im deutschen Artikel "Afrika Museum" auch nur als "Maske aus Gabun" beschrieben. Weißt Du mehr? --Maimaid (talk) 11:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Maimaid: Ich habe die niederländische Beschriftung auf Wikimedia Commpns wohl wort-wörtlich von der Museumsbeschriftung abgeschrieben, die ich fotografiert hatte, und habe diese dann ins Deutsche und Englische übersetzt. Ich vermute, dass es sich mehr um das Volk handelt als um einen Ort oder ein Gebiet. Daher halte ich die Beschreibung "Maske aus Gabun" im Artikel für perfekt. Wer genaueres wissen will, wird sowieso auf das Bild klicken. Ich freue mich sehr, dass Du meinen Artikelwunsch erfüllt hast, und hoffe dass er zahlreiche Leser findet. Sollten wir ihn auf de:WP:SG? eintragen? Zum Beispiel:

• Das Afrika Museum in Berg en Dal ist Teil des neuen niederländischen Nationalmuseums der Weltkulturen. NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: Dankeschön, das ist eine gute Idee - machst DU das? (letztes Mal, als ich einen eigenen kleinen Artikel für SG vorgeschlagen habe, zog ich damit ganz ungewollt die Aufmerksamkeit von Usern auf den Artikel, die ihn sonst vermutlich nie gelesen hätten. Es folgte ein LA, eine unglaubliche LD und endlose Diskussionen um Nichtigkeiten auf der Disk, die mich glauben ließen, im falschen Film zu sein...Letztlich blieb der Artikel, sieht aber jetzt völlig anders aus als meine erste Version. Falls Du es Dir antun willst, schau mal hier: [4] (wollte nicht immer nur Biografien schreiben, sondern mal etwas "Lustigeres") :-)
Beim Miniaturenwettbewerb hab ich "Afrika Museum" auf Deinen Vorschlag hin schon eingereicht. Viele Grüße --Maimaid (talk) 14:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Maimaid: Ja, ich habe den Artikel auf de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Hauptseite/Schon_gewusst#Vorschlag:_Afrika_Museum_.284._März_2016.29 hochgeladen, und hoffe, dass er dort anders als die de:Nuckelpinne behandelt wird. Ob das Lemma besser Afrikamuseum oder Afrika-Museum heißen sollte, wird sich herausstellen. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Warwickslade Cutting Railway, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Warwickslade Cutting Railway was assembled from prefabricated rail sections with pin to tube joints, like those of a toy railway? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Warwickslade Cutting Railway. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 00:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC) 00:02, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

]

Theodosius II of Constantinople

Everything in the bibliography except "page" which I translated is names that cannot be translated. Antondimak (talk) 12:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your DYK review. I will try to tweak some of the descriptive quotes to make their attributions more clear (they are mostly from Brown & Jackson (1990)). I also tweaked the nickname "Bubble car" as per your edit summary (small "c" in car). Cheers, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 14:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and comment for the article Sushil Pokharel. I shall add more categories as I come across more information about the figure. --10:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)Kpaudel969 (talk)

On 24 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Colossus of Ostermunzel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Colossus of Ostermunzel (pictured) is significantly lighter than originally estimated? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Colossus of Ostermunzel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NearEMPTiness, thanks for your review and comments on Liverpool City Council election, 1900. I acknowledge that, at the moment, there is not much text. I wanted to get the basic data onto Wikipedia and intend to add extra information on Aldermanic elections, by-elections and context and analytical data in due course. I hope that is OK? Regards, Pat.moloney (talk) 18:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pat.moloney: Absolutely. It is very good that the ball is already rolling by now. There might even be some old photographs available on the internet. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four years ago, you were recipient no. 1357 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I would like to thank you very much for your review of my article. It means much to have feedback from someone as experienced as yourself! Keep up the good work. God bless.

- Susanna Correya

Susanna Correya 11:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

@SusannaCorreya: Thank you very much for the nice kitten, indeed. I actually enjoyed reading and reviewing your article on St. Theresa's Girls' Higher Secondary School. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not my article, it is an article I moved upon request.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me about this. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why the heck did you approve this piece of garbarge? It's of minimal notability and the sourcing is crap, why is it in our encyclopedia? I have grave doubts about your ability to approve articles. BMK (talk) 00:51, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The "53rd highest peak in Indiana"? BMK (talk) 02:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to do what is required: My approval can easily be reverted. However, I personally think that words like "this piece of garbage" are not appropriate in the context of this project. Please read again

WP:ETIQ and try to understand what is written between the lines. Please keep your voice down, when communicating with me and the author of this article. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

"You broke my priceless vase playing ball in the house!!!!" "Don't you know that yelling at your kids is no longer politically correct?"

Thanks, I'll be the one to judge the proper level of my ire and the tone and loudness of my "voice". Your approval was an egregious act which did not improve the encyclopedia and deserved every decibel I put into it. If I run across your approving another article as bad as this again, it will become a matter that I will thoroughly investigate and then bring to the noticeboards, so I suggest you apply some more stringent standards in the future. BMK (talk) 05:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the draft that was moved by NearEMPTiness contained a lot more citations (admittedly in poor format) that were later expurgated by another editor. We need to get along, folks. Play nice. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NearEMPTiness:

I read the messages you left on

]

List of non-carrier aircraft flown from aircraft carriers

Thanks for the review - I have added a link on another page - aviation lists have been subject to a discussion regarding content and formatting and photos are no longer to be embedded in tables, and if I could find a relevant image on wikimedia I would add one at the intro. - NiD.29 (talk) 18:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Its glad you read and left such sweet words. stay blessed. Just help me protecting the same from getting deleted. Medialove41 (talk) 18:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to

. It's policy. Cheers. 12:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

@User:7&6=thirteen Thank you very much indeed for reviewing this article. The article was orgiginally written in the NL:WP and then translated by me to DE:WP. I have thoroughly checked the internet for references, and believe that the information in the article is correct. Even so I cannot easily provide references to all the paragraphs, and need to check some printed literature now. This will need a bit of time. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. This can wait. Unfortunately, the citation problem can get sticky. See the

WP:BLP (higher standard I would think); we finally had to eliminate some of her awards because we could not find sources to back up the facts stated in the Swedish Wikipedia. And I am virtually certain those facts were accurate, but the language barrier proved to be almost impenetrable. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK nomination of Lawa Railway

]

DYK for Lawa Railway

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

]

Thanks, I didn't note, how new these are. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article about Hundsheimer Berg(e) (nature reserve) that I created earlier today. I noticed and you wrote me that you changed the name of the page by adding the "e" and making it plural. I used the singular version though because based on the official brochure that I have regarding the nature reserve and the LIFE project that took place, it is called "Hundsheimer Berg". I also find this at the official website of the LIFE project (http://www.steppe.at/downloads/g_6_HundsheimerBerg.pdf). Please let me know your view on the correct naming, keeping in mind the above information.

Thank you, Vlendert (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Vlendert: By now I noted that there are two options. If you want to move the article back, I propose that you add this official link and that above to the references. This seems to be a smaller area than that covered on the German Wikipedia, to which I installed the Wikidata link. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr Near

I warmly welcome your contributions, thank you.

We have bumped into each other this afternoon. If I have zapped anything you've added it is my incompetence, for which I apologise.

Is there any way we can alert each other when we intend to have a bash. so we can complement each other rather than conflict?

Best wishes

DaveDavidAHull (talk) 15:06, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidAHull: I am very much impressed by the information that you have found and uploaded about this railway and unfortunately have not noticed that we were editing at the same time. I have added some additional figures, as you have noticed. Now I will take a break, so that you can proceed with the "work in progress". I think, the large National Trust file is worth downloading:

• Caroline Hardie and Harry Beamish: Historic Environment Survey for the National Trust Properties on the Northumberland Coast Lindisfarne Report No: 0058/5-09. (16.3 MB)]

At a later stage, I will recommend to move comments such as "Sliding the blue circle leftwards shows a clear underwater trace of the jetty, but no hint of the trackbed on the farmland north to Chare Ends. The 1860 6" map does not have the overlay facility, but by switching between images the user can identify several early structures" into the footnotes. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: I think we're on the same wavelength and both bring something to the party. I will soldier on this evening, probably finishing all I can usefully contribute. Tomorrow (Tues 28th) I will be out from 09:00 to 17:00, so the stage will be yours. I will welcome you putting the stuff about the blue blob into a footnote and to you downloading the National Trust stuff, I don't know how to do the former or know where the latter is. Kind regards, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidAHull: I have now collated all hints about the maps into a new section called "Notes" according to Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: groups. I personally think that these hints are too long to be shown inside the main text. You can easily undo this in the tab "View history", if you think it is too complicated for some readers. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: What you have done with Notes is wonderful. It opens a whole new way of handling such things for me, especially as I have taken to using the NLoS maps big time over recent months. As you will see, I've added Map numbers to try to make users' lives that bit easier, I hope you agree. I've corrected the name of the sketch artist and added a Further reading section. That's my lot. I look forward to seeing you putting the tin hat on the article when I get home this evening. Kind regards, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 07:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidAHull: Thank you for the improvements. I think that the work has progressed very successfully so far. Now I have 2-3 recommendations for cosmetical improvements:

• I propose to spell consistently either "waggon" or "wagon", unless you want to attract search engines. At the moment both variants can be found in the article.
• I propose to modify one of the headlines from "Tramway, waggonway and quarrying operations", e.g. to "Operations at quarries, waggonway, kilns and jetties". I think that "tramway" is obsolete, because the synonym has already been explained in the introduction, and the ships, jetties and or staithes should be mentioned. However, I am not sure, how it should be re-phrased.
• Just a question to confirm that I understood Map 2 correctly: Does the westerly track start at the "26" mark of the rule and ends one third down the way to the high water mark? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: I really appreciate the changes you've made during the day; unearthing colour copies of both of Hedley's paintings is a masterstroke. I've moved the RM article from Sources to Further reading as it isn't actually used in the text. Regarding your three points:

• I suspect that waggon, wagon, waggonway, wagonway and tramway are all used inth text. One of Jermy's opening remarks is that the spellings evolved over the period of the railway, with waggon(way) segueing into wagon(way) into tramway. I suggest we put a note to that effect, then use waggon(way) consistently for the first two lines, then tramway for the third. I'm certainly happy to spell waggon/wagon consistently unless in quotations from original sources.

• I'm happy to change the heading. I merged your Ships section into the overlapping evidence of the decline of the third venture as it seemed all of a piece.

• I'll address this point after tea!

DaveDavidAHull (talk) 17:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now to your third item.

• Map 2 is a lot easier to understand if you look at the original map as linked here ^{Map 1 in its entirity, via NLoS} where the top exactly matches the bottom of Map 2. If there is any way you could do a new version of Map 1 going right to the top of the sheet it might help.

The route diagram shows two lines at Acres Quarry, but neither OS map shows a second line diverging off the line going through 26. I have taken that second quarry line (siding) from Jermy's own composite map which shows two tracks near Seal Gut.

Kind regards

DaveDavidAHull (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:DYK

scheme? If you want, I could do this, if you help me, if any actions will be required. Otherwise, I could give you some hints, how to do this yourself. I propose for instance the following teasers:

Did you know...

• ... that ships were moored between two jetties of the Holy Island Waggonway (pictured) for unloading coal and loading lime?
• ... that coal and lime were transported on the Holy Island Waggonway (pictured) in different directions?
• ... that the Holy Island Waggonway (pictured) was made up of three successive railway lines?
• ... any better idea for a teaser?--NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness:

I need to revisit my responses to your questions earlier. I replied in haste that "I'm happy to change the heading.", I should have written "I'm happy for you to change the heading." Tramway and waggonway are indeed tautological given all that's gone before, and ships should be mentioned.

I'll be pleased to help you to do a link from the main page within the

scheme, I've never seen such a thing before, let alone done one.

I happened to glance back at work I've recently done on the West Somerset Mineral Railway and see you've added a picture or pictures there, too. I take my hat off to you for your skills and scope with this. I'd love you to have a stab at other stuff I've done in the last few months,notably about Cumbria, SW Lancashire, NE Lincolnshire and, in the past, my first love, the LDECR. You are the second person I've come across in the Wikipedia world who is constructive and encouraging, it's such a rare treat.

Kind regards

DaveDavidAHull (talk) 20:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS, I should have added that I reckon the teaser "* ... that the Holy Island Waggonway (pictured) was made up of three successive railway lines?" is the best, though you might like to weave the word Lindisfarne in, to catch the eye and avoid umpteen other Holy Islands Dave DavidAHull (talk) 21:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidAHull: I have now nominated the article on Template talk:Did_you_know#Holy Island Waggonway. I will keep an eye on it and will contact you, if the reviewer requests some actions. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 23:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: The teaser looks great, is it now "live"?

Having slept on it all, I wonder two further things, both down to you, alas. a) Instead of editing Map 1, can you join the full Map 1 to Map 2 to make one continuous map? If you did I'd volunteer to make the necessary changes to the text and other map numbers. EDIT: I SHOULD HAVE LOOKED FIRST!! GREAT MINDS THINK ALIKE b) Hedley did a painting of Lindisfarne Castle from near the village. The twin jetties must be in the picture, but might be too far away to be useful. The only image I've seen is too small to tell and I can't enlarge it. Can you find it and decide whether to include it?

Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 08:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidAHull: Thanks for keeping me updated.

• I have uploaded our
  WP:DYK
  nomination onto the relevant web page yesterday, but now it will need several days or weeks until it will be presented on the main page of Wikipedia. Until then the nomination will be reviewed, particularly regarding potential copyright violations and regarding references for the facts mentioned in the teasers.
• When you mentioned your idea on stitching the maps, I noted that we have very similar thoughts, which was a pleasant experience.
• Today I looked at some of your other Wikipedia articles and was impressed by their quantity and quality. My focus is on narrow gauge railways, and from time to time I write or expand English articles, but more often I translate foreign articles to German.
• By now, I have drafted a German translation of the complete Holy Island Waggonway, which I want to upload onto the German Wikipedia on or after 1 July 2016.
• I still have some concerns about the use of the term "Tramway" for the eastern railroad, because it is mentioned as "Old Waggonway" on the relevant map. Thus I will keep my eyes open for other references, and potentially change this also to Waggonway, to minimise confusion.
• I could find the blurry photograph of the oil painting, but do not think that this is relevant to the waggonways.
• It was and is a pleasure to work with you on this article, and I hope to meet you ocasionally both virtually and/or at one of the upcoming railway events. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Maps

@DavidAHull: (cc:@MagentaGreen:) I hope you can help me with the following three requests:

• I have asked a virtual friend from the German photographic workshop, user:MagentaGreen, to stitch-up a better map. His draft is shown in "Map A". It is is certainly large enough but I think it it a little bit too blurry for our purpose. Generating the complete map at high resolution seems to be impossible both because of the final file size and the file size during processing. Thus I propose that you and I agree to the best section for our purposes. I think that "Map B" is, what we should insert into our article, instead of my draft, if the resolution could be further improved. To avoid unnecessary work, I want to ask you now: Is the cropped section in "Map B" is perfect for our needs, if the resolution could be improved?
• My second question is about the colour of the frame: I personally think that the colour of the purple frame is a bit too modern, and would prefer a navy blue similar to that of a link that hasn't been clicked, unless this colour is MagentaGreen's trade mark. Do you agree to navy blue?
• Finally, MagentaGreen wants to know, whether he should upload also the 26,6 MB file of Map C. I think this would be optionally very useful but not essential. Do you agree?

• 
  Map A: Northumberland Map Sheet IIX (including Elwick, Holy Island, Kyloe, Ross)
• 
  Map B: The perfect section as Map 1 of our article, according to my preference (ignore the purple line)
• 
  Map C:Blurred rendering

By the way: The German version is now online (despite of the result of the referendum). --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: Map B is superb and will be just the job with a navy blue border, renamed as Map 1.

My ideal overall map would be an outline of the island with all three lines drawn on, simple labels for the key lime features plus a handful of landmark features such as the castle, the priory and both causeways to the mainland. Jermy 1992 p6 has something very close to the ideal, but it is copyright. The trouble with Map C is that it predates the third tramway and therefore doesn't add a lot to Map B. Alas, I am no draughtsman. A number of articles, such as Padarn Railway include such a map, but I have no idea how to even begin drawing such a thing. Do you or your friend know how to do so?

Kind regards, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 21:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick reply. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidAHull:

• I assume that you have noticed the new map, which highlights two of the three waggonways. I am not sure whether there are additional rail tracks: Is there a southerly branch near the "I" of "THE LINK", which then follows the border of a field and then turns sharply left (on a turntable?) by 90° towards the south-east? John Higgins' map of 1860 shows such a line. Is there another branch near the "K" of "THE LINK"?
• We received some feed back regarding our
  WP:DYK nomination on Template:Did you know nominations/Holy Island Waggonway. I am not sure, how to react or comment. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:19, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

@NearEMPTiness: I've now seen the wonderful Map 1 with red and purple lines. I take my hat off to you for it.

I know of two very short, but in my view significant, stretches of track not coloured red or purple.The first is in the earlier limeworks we refer to as St Cuthbert's, served by the first, red, waggonway. Immediately right of the word "Well" a dark line leaves the red line heading northwards, it loops back on itself just below the number "50". This was an example of grade separation, it was used by northbound loads of coal from the original jetty which climbed up the black line and curved round onto the southbound limestone track, itself on an embankment, from the quarries on the coast. Both coal and stone were then tipped into the top of the kiln. My route diagram seeks to make this clear (suggestions for improvement welcome.) The second missing line is shown on the source OS map as an embankment with no track, presumably it was being built when the map was surveyed. If you look at the bottom "Limekiln" (which we know as the Lower Kennedy kilns) a faint grey line heads NE from the northern end of the building itself, merging into the purple track from Nessend Quarry. This was an embankment by which coal and limestone were fed into the top of the kiln. Stone came direct form the quarry, whilst coal came up from the old jetty then reversed back up the same embankment. As before, coal and stone were then gravity fed into the kiln. Once again, my RD seeks to portray this. Arguably the line southwards from the kilns should be purple as far as the red line.

The only missing line thereafter would be (say) blue for the third and final waggonway (tramway) heading northwest-southeast north of the N and K of LINK, on or very close to the unfenced track which more or less parallels the coast.

Higgins' 1860 map is treasure, but, being drafted for land enclosure purposes, it adds and omits features which interest us. The most obvious omission is the waggonway south of what he calls the "Present Lime Kilns" to the old jetty. His draughtsmanship may be the reason the "Old Lime Kilns" appear to be on the sea shore, the OS map has the buildings more inland, but I doubt this is significant, I can well imagine St C's Limekilns site reached the shore. I puzzled for ages about the two near-horizontal lines, both of which have "J S D Selby Esq" beneath them. When I finally resorted to getting my magnifying glass out I saw they are fences, not railways at all. I also realised a reason for his hasty retreat from the Lower Kennedy kilns, they are ON SELBY'S LAND, ie just south of the fence.

I'll send this then look at the response to the nomination.

Kind regards, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 21:36, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've now had a look at the review. I suggest we forget DYK, such destructive anal retentivism does Wikipedia more harm than good. I don't intend to descend to that level.

All the best, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 21:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for both comments. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidAHull: Thank you very much for your helpful comments and also for your patience, especially as I have no access to page 6 of Jermy's book. Our colleague is making good progress. I have now received a new draft, as shown below, and would propose the following changes to him, if you agree:

• Convert the green dotted lines into red continuous lines, please YES PLEASE
• Change the blue lines to pink lines, please YES PLEASE, EXCEPT I don't know where the very short new line southwards from the New Kennedy kiln has come from, I can't see it on the source map
• Add an (if you want dotted) green line north of the "N" and "K" of LINK, please YES PLEASE; CONTINUOUS, NOT DOTTED
• (if possible: Add a (if you want dotted) green line on the larger map towards the the two castle jetties as shown on this YES PLEASE; CONTINUOUS, NOT DOTTED and that NO THANK YOU map)
• (if possible: Add "Castle Point Limeworks" in green letters YES PLEASE)
• Change the turquois line to a pink line (do you agree?) I DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS LINE IS, IS IT A STREAM? I DON'T THINK IT IS A RAILWAY
• Ignore the lines highlighted with blue arrows until further notice, please (do you agree?) YES, I AGREE, I SUSPECT THEY ARE STREAMS, TOO
• Add "St Cuthbert's Limeworks" in red letters near the Limekiln close to the currently green dotted lines, please YES PLEASE
• Add "Lower Kennedy Limeworks" in pink letters near the Limekiln close to the currently blue lines, please YES PLEASE

(talk) 15:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@NearEMPTiness: please see comments next to each point, above. Kind regards, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 20:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: I've now seen the latest map of the whole island with the three lines in three colours. It's pretty close to my dream, wow! Inevitably I can see scope for more work, but hey, you're definitely winning. I suggest the wording "Lower Kennedy Limeworks" be moved down a bit, but that's merely a suggestion. I still believe the very short purple line leading southwards from the Lower Kennedy kiln didn't exist, the red line being the actual siding which was used to take product southwards. In any event, that longer red siding should be purple, it was Lower Kennedy only.

Moving on to the turquoise (cyan?) line representing the third route, I reckon it's spot on except for the complicated stuff round the castle. The schematic is set out in my route diagram which is based on visits some years ago and, more importantly, on detailed text and photos in Jermy's fine works. The key feature which explains a lot is the preserved bridge which forms the first image near the top of our article. As at the two earlier limeworks, the tracks for loading coal and stone into the tops of the kilns and taking finished product from the bottoms of the kilns were grade separated. At St Cuthbert's works this involved incoming coal being hauled up an incline then turning back in a 180 degree loop, at Lower Kennedy coal went past the kilns towards Nessend then reversed up the same slope used by incoming limestone.

At Castlepoint limestone came down the eastern track, gently climbing on an embankment which is plain to see to this day, on the ground and on umpteen photos. This meant that limestone reached the north side of the castle mound about half the height needed to reach the top of the kilns, slightly to the left of the "W" in "Well", which I'll come back to in a minute. The track then continued round the castle mound falling in a spiral to meet the line as drawn where it passes through some text which I can't decypher, but which appears to begin with "C". Coal came up this spiral from the jetty to the "W" in "Well" which I promised to return to. At this "W" point both coal and stone were about halfway up as high as they needed to be, so a short siding was built on a slope curving off approximately (sufficiently close for our purposes) to the "tl" in "Castle". The slope gained the height needed to be at the kilns' tops. To summarise, coal came up to point "W" from ships then continued up the sloping siding to the kiln tops, stone came down to point "W" then reversed up the sloping siding to the kiln tops. Both were then tipped in to the kilns.

So much for input, now to output.

Output was loaded onto wagons at ground level. The track couldn't run due west to the jetty because the castle was in the way, so it ran northwest, passing under the stone tramway by the well-preserved bridge, then curved westwards to pass round the castle mound to the sidings and jetty. From space this output track and the sloping spiral track ran parallel, converging near the obscured word. On the ground the output track was virtually level, but the spiral track was, er, a spiral.

As drawn the cyan line confuses the input and output tracks. 1. It should be redrawn as a steady curve between point "W" and the obscured word, part way up the hatching the map uses to show the castle mound. 2. The short, sloping siding should be added from point W to the tl in Castle, the slope won't show of course, I include it for continuity of description. 3. The output track should be added from just to the right of the "5 O" to the right (east) of the castle, heading NW to pass under the cyan line approx under the cyan "k" in Limekilns. It should then swing west and skirt the foot of the castle mound as shown by the hatching, meeting the revised line near the obscured word. I hope it will be possible to represent the bridge as it is such a clear, prominent and easily findable reference point for any reader whose fancy we tickle.

I hope you and your fabulous cartographer receive this in the constructive and impressed spirit in which I send it.

Kind regards

DaveDavidAHull (talk) 08:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:DYK and its German equivalent de:WP:SG? have both been approved, and I am looking forward to checking how many readers we attract. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

@NearEMPTiness: If you're satisfied the short siding below Lower Kennedy is real, then I'm delighted to have it. I'm amazed the DYK has been approved, we didn't go through the whole article looking for every unspecified fact, adding a reference not at the end of paragraphs. I'm doing further research on the limeworkers' accommodation to the north of the island. I have a lead, but it hasn't produced anything yet. I'll let you know if it does. When the map is finalised I'll go through the text editing the passages which tried to guide readers through the uncoloured version. Lots of wording there is rendered redundant now we have the wonderful coloured lines and places overlain. Kind regards, Dave PS: I'm also working on a route diagram for the railways to Dinorwic, encompassing the Padarn, Dinorwic and LNW lines. I'll invite your comments before going public. DavidAHull (talk) 06:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:DYK. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you. I agree there's no urgency.DavidAHull (talk) 06:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: Have you any idea why the route diagram in Holy Island Waggonway has suddenly started appearing in the middle of the screen? It's nothing I've knowingly done. It looks out of place there.

DaveDavidAHull (talk) 20:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidAHull: It is correctly displayed on my computer both with Firefox and Google Chrome. It is displayed right of the text on my computer in all size adjustments, which I choose by <Cntrl> <+> or <Cntrl> <->. It is displayed larger than the other photographs and maps due to the setting "upright=2.33". Setting this to a smaller number would reduce the size. By the way: Two new German maps appeared this morning on de:Penrhyn Quarry Railway and are currently being translated to English. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:18, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited D.A.V Public School, Mahuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shree. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

]

Hello, NearEMPTiness. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for The Creation of the Violin at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with DYK and all the best, Miniapolis 20:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Miniapolis: Thank you very much for your efforts. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 22:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again

Here's my draft route diagram I mentioned recently. I would welcome any feedback. We're off on a short break tomorrow (Weds 13th) until Saturday, so I'm unlikely to see any correspondence then.

v t e Railways to Dinorwic
Legend
Key Padarn Railway Quarry Gauge Dinorwic Railway Standard Gauge LLR LLR on Padarn Route SMR ----------- 1824-43 Wharf Port Dinorwic 1843-1961 Wharf 1852-1962 Wharf Port Incline Port Dinorwic stations Caernarfon-Bangor Penscoins Garth Incline Cefn-Gwyn Crossing Bethel Caernarfon Pen-Sarn Pont Rhythallt Mill West Pont Rhythallt Mill East Pontrhythallt Pont-Rhythallt Pen-y-Llyn Cwm-y-Glo Penllyn (LLR) Llyn Padarn Cei Llydan Craig-Lwyd Incline Pen-yr Incline Chwarel-Fawr Quarry Allt Ddu Quarry Allt Ddu Incline The Village Branch Hospital Vivian Quarry Gilfach-Ddu Llanberis Llanberis (LLR) Steam Mill Garret Quarry The Tramline Llanberis (SMR) Wellington File:BSicon uextSTRag.svg Llyn Peris File:BSicon uextSTRef.svg Braich Quarry Hafod Owen Australia Quarry Victoria Quarry Snowdon Summit

This is a route-map template for a UK railway.

• For information on using this template, refer to Template:Routemap.
• For pictograms used, see Commons:BSicon/Catalogue.

Kind regards

DaveDavidAHull (talk) 06:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This looks very good and it encouraged me, to click the blue links. I guess, another blue link could easily be provided to Snowdown Summit. I am not sure, whether I deciphered the line of 'Port Dinorwic' correctly. I guess the different shades of blue symbolise that it is salt water and not a lake. But what is left of it? Is this a lock, which looks a bit like an incline? And what is right of it? Are these the grey harbour walls? I am looking forward to seeing this route diagram in the article(s). --NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just back from a short holiday in Devon. Thank you for your kind and constructive remarks. Yes, I'll add a blue link to Snowdon Summit. Remarkably, Port Dinorwic is still live, though it is now a pleasure marina, not an industrial site. The structure to the right of the dock is a dry dock (standard Wikipedia icon) which I believe is also still live, also for pleasure craft. As for Locks looking rather like inclines, the dock is protected from the tides by a lock (still is) and the icon is the standard icon for lock. I have adapted to indicate an incline, so if either is wrong it is inclines, not locks! I know of no icon for incline, so when I saw another, established, diagram use it I adopted it with delight. I reckon the combination of railway line, chevrons and label "XXX Incline" makes them unambiguous.

I'll build it into the relevant articles in the next few days.

Kind regards

DaveDavidAHull (talk) 19:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. However, I don't want to be a hero, just a cog in the machine. Have a nice sunday.--Buchbibliothek (talk) 05:08, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your revision! Good sunday, --Pampuco (talk) 07:58, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message re the page I created. Yes, I could see the problems with the references, which looked very ugly but I couldn't work out how to fix them. Fortunately some other kind person has done it in the meantime. Best

]

DYK for Holy Island Waggonway

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I note that at least two of the ships were lost through fire. Would you please add the details to the relevant "list of shipwrecks in (year)" if they don't already appear?

]

I will ask user:DavidAHull, whether he knows, in which year they sank. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to Jermy 1992 The WILLIAM shifted at her berth in Holy Island harbour on 17 April 1847. The vessel settled on her anchor, puncturing the hull. Water got to the cargo of quicklime and the boat caught fire, only eventually being extinguished by the rising tide (pages 26-7). The CURLEW had taken on lime on 31 July 1868, whereafter "off the May Light water came into contact with the cargo and the heat generated set fire to the vessel. She sank but her two man crew was saved..." (page 43). Kind regards, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 11:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mjroots2 (cc: DavidAHull): Thank you for your motivating comments. I have edited the sunken ships to: List of shipwrecks in 1847 and List of shipwrecks in 1868. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Thank you for your kind remark about my first Barnstar. I look at Holy Island Waggonway from time to time to see if the cartographer has added the detail around the kilns and jetties near Lindisfarne Castle, if and when he does I will redraft the text of the article as directions where to look on the map will become redundant. Are you in touch with him? Do you know if he still intends to make these changes? Kind regards, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should consider expanding this a bit more and adding one or two more sources and nominating it for Wikipedia:Did you know.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:DYK credit today about another narrow gauge railway. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nanamava

added a link pointing to Masumabad

Zell unter Aichelberg

added a link pointing to Ha

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you for helping me improve talk) 21:04, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply ]

@Class455fan1: Thank you very much for this nice gesture. Best regards, Class 395 fan a.k.a NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

)

DYK nomination of John J. Coit

]

DYK for John J. Coit

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
123		Kerala Express (talk)						Add sources
449		Canoeing (talk)						Add sources
90		Narayan Rao (talk)						Add sources
798		Rajdhani Express (talk)						Add sources
116		Tamil Nadu Express (talk)						Add sources
54		Baner (talk)						Add sources
1,207		San Bernardino, California (talk)						Cleanup
1,492		Atlantic City, New Jersey (talk)						Cleanup
53		Khadki (talk)						Cleanup
44		talk )						Expand
420		Chennai Central railway station (talk)						Expand
6		Klink, Germany (talk)						Expand
19		Karve Road (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
17		Gowthami Express (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
208		Central Railway zone (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
2,449		Punk rock (talk)						Merge
52		Pune Bus Rapid Transit (talk )						Merge
46		Rail rolling stock in New South Wales (talk)						Merge
65		talk )						Wikify
16		West Bengal Sampark Kranti Express (talk)						Wikify
3		talk )						Wikify
15		The Grand New Delhi (talk)						Orphan
5		Mirabbas Gasymov (talk )						Orphan
3		Arise Gheorghe, Arise Ioan! (talk)						Orphan
33		Pune Race Course (talk)						Stub
18		Long Beach and Asbury Park Railway (talk)						Stub
15		Solapur railway division (talk)						Stub
19		talk )						Stub
32		talk )						Stub
71		Sampoorna Kranti Express (talk)						Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NearEMPTiness, I would like to hear your opinion: I added sons and daughters of the town to the article Gelsenkirchen, and also added three photos from commons. Another user removed the photos two times. Who is right? Thanks.--Buchbibliothek (talk) 21:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Buchbibliothek: I personally think these two black and white pictures are not suitable for the article about Gelsenkirchen. They should better be shown in the articles about these persons. Additional reasons to remove them are as follows: The pictures are not of very high quality, the people are not very well known, the article has already a large number of pictures. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. Regards--Buchbibliothek (talk) 21:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I did not work on the article since 6.7.2016, so it is an article that unfortunately did not find the way in my excel file for touch up. I asked you to give me a message if you find an article from me like this, so I can correct it, because I don't want other people to do work like this for me. Regards--Buchbibliothek (talk) 09:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the commments. I did not check the date, indeed. The content of the article is very interesting. Thus it is worth spending more time on improving its quality. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 01:07, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gruby Josek is notable. Go to "google books" and google "U grubego Joska", "Gruby Josek". The books are in Polish, but he is notable. The song "Bal u stargeo Joska" in Polish is well known, this is to the point that almost everybody in Poland knows his name. It is urban folk - like John Henry (folklore). I will add more references and link to youtube. He is not related to me in any way. Puncinus (talk) 16:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Puncinus: thank you for the clarification. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, I am working on the Dagenham Coup now and it will shortly be an article itself.Racingmanager (talk) 13:41, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for joining

. Here is some information about participating in the event:

1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
5. Wikipedia Asian Month is also held in other language Wikipedia and count independently. Check for language editions.
6. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes, --AddisWang (talk) 06:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your compliments on this article, NearEMPTiness!

This is a very informative article. For me, it looked as if the brakes had only failed at the bottom of the hill, although I assume that the break failure had already occured before, resulting in the excessive speed.

I am very pleased to hear that you found it to be informative. I myself had originally thought that the brakes only failed as it reached the bottom of the hill, but a couple of sources that I found stated otherwise. Even thought the brakes obviously weren't working properly, one can certainly speculate that the excessive speed may have contributed to the failure of the brakes. I'm also rather surprised that there is not too much information about this crash on the internet, considering it's significance. --Undescribed (talk) 20:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi NearEMPTiness, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Congratulations! You have more than 4 accepted articles in Wikipedia Asian Month! Please submit your mailing address (not the email) via this google form. This form is only accessed by me and your username will not distribute to the local community to send postcards. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. Please contact your local organizers if you have any question. Best, Addis Wang, sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

That table might be a good idea for replacing the separate infoboxes... I'm actually in the middle of some (offline) work on that page, when I get to doing that on the actual page I'll implement this table with a few necessary changes based on some data I have from 한국철도차량 100년사. 2Q (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the update. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the page and the table, and added the table to the main page; maybe you'll want to look at it for additions to the de.wiki version of the page? 2Q (talk) 22:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harlech Tramway

Hello. I'm pleased to tell you I've sourced copies of the article and letters in "The Narrow Gauge" you have found reference to. I've been promised them in the next day or two. I'll act accordingly when it does. Boyd should be here in a week or so. Kind regards, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 21:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Loch Ewe Distillery

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Loch Ewe Distillery

Mifter (talk) 12:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NearEMPTiness, although your DYK nomination of the article was promoted to prep, it has acquired a template about its overly brief lead section. We cannot promote the article to the main page with that template on it.

If you could expand the lead section by a few sentences right away, we could avoid having to pull the nomination back from prep. Please reply here as soon as you've been able to do that; if it doesn't happen in the next 24 hours or so, we will probably have to pull the nomination back until you have been able to deal with it, or someone else does so. I hope you see this soon. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: Thank you for the comment. I have expanded the lead section by now.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mississippi River and Bonne Terre Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Summit rail station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Springdale, Nevada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghosttown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mifter (talk) 02:13, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to hear your two cents on this: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Rail transport in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts/archive1, when you have a moment. If enough people say they support this on the page, we'll get another piece of train-related featured content on Wikipedia. Jackdude101 (Talk) 14:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see that today, thank you! It's also featured on Portal:Germany. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting the Rail transport in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts article during its featured list review (it passed)! I am now putting the Disneyland Railroad article through a featured article review here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Disneyland Railroad/archive1. You are welcome to comment on that one, also. Jackdude101 01:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. Well deserved. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Autonomous Rail Rapid Transit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autonomous Rail Rapid Transit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anmccaff (talk) 18:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you hid the copyright infringement notice on Boat Quay. Copyright infringement does not depend on whether it is available online or not (and in the case of books, Googlebook often remove the scanned pages of books after complaints), if you want to remove the notice, please rewrite the section thoroughly to remove any infringement. Hzh (talk) 13:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:AGF. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

I have the book concerned, so I do know the text was copied from the book. The problem is extensive, apparently the editor copied the text verbatim into many many articles on places in Singapore, and a large part of the book has been copied. These edits have stayed there for many years unnoticed, but the editor also appears not to be active for many years. I mentioned the problem here in the Singapore project talk page [5]. I only tagged a few articles, and I'm sure there are a lot more. I'm not really sure what to do about it unless someone wants to hunt them all down and delete them all. I have tried to fix some of the articles, but cannot fix them all. Hzh (talk) 20:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being vigilant. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
685		Canadian National Railway (talk)	Add sources
11		Port Reading Railroad (talk)	Add sources
6		St. Joseph and Grand Island Railway (talk)	Add sources
6		talk )	Add sources
59		Heliopolis, Cairo (talk)	Add sources
53		Bahariya Oasis (talk)	Add sources
5		talk )	Cleanup
52		Robert Stephenson and Company (talk)	Cleanup
58		Helwan (talk)	Cleanup
21		Pittsburgh and West Virginia Railway (talk)	Expand
45		History of Chittagong (talk)	Expand
74		Zamalek (talk)	Expand
169		Comilla (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
26		talk )	Unencyclopaedic
72		Key System (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
20		Bharat Bhari Udyog Nigam (talk )	Merge
36		Durgapur railway station (talk)	Merge
44		talk )	Merge
18		Carriage Repair Workshop, Harnaut (talk)	Wikify
27		Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation (talk)	Wikify
6		talk )	Wikify
5		Tree of the Virgin (talk )	Orphan
6		Howlader (talk)	Orphan
4		Mohamed Enani (talk)	Orphan
3		Reginald Engelbach (talk)	Stub
185		Clinton Lee Young (talk)	Stub
6		Dodge City station (talk)	Stub
21		Grand Trunk Corporation (talk)	Stub
9		Coal and Coke Railway (talk)	Stub
6		Chicago, Indiana and Southern Railroad (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 20:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for

, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please

.

Thank you!

-

The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

DYK for Fayoum Light Railway

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Why did you add an article of LTN(自由時報) to the Talk page in the ja:ノート:羅東森林鉄路(Talk:Luodong Forest Railway)? I had already written at the first edition with LTN's news source. so It's not necessary. You should add it to not Japanese edition but Chinese edition(zh:羅東森林鐵路). --Tze Chiang Hao (talk) 08:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{Quote box| align = left| quoted = true | bgcolor =#d9eff0| title= [[:ja:羅東森林鉄路#保存現況|ja:羅東森林鉄路(Luodong Forest Railway)#保存現況]]| quote =<div style="text-align: right;">[[2017年]]秋には天送埤駅の軌道工事が完了し、ミニトロッコ列車も落成した<ref>{{in lang|zh-tw}}[http://news.tvbs.com.tw/travel/786612 太平山森林鐵路「五分仔車」　三星鄉重現]2017-10-11,TVBS</ref>。近々三星駅までの約3.9kmで旅客運行が復活予定となっている<ref>{{in lang|zh-tw}}[http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1142279 太平山林鐵五分仔車 月底試營運]2017-10-10,[[自由時報]]</ref>。}}

@Tze Chiang Hao: Sorry, this was a mistake, indeed. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 08:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including

]

Thanks for the recomendation. I'm held back by the efforts for

WP:QPQ

.

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including

]

Thanks. I thought this happened automatically through a robot. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! You have more than 4 accepted articles in Wikipedia Asian Month! Please submit your postal mailing address via Google form or email me about that on [email protected] before the end of Janauary, 2018. The Wikimedia Asian Month team only has access to this form, and we will only share your address with local affiliates to send postcards. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. Please contact your local organizers if you have any question. We apologize for the delay in sending this form to you, this year we will make sure that you will receive your postcard from WAM. If you've not received a postcard from last year's WAM, Please let us know. All ambassadors will receive an electronic certificate from the team. Be sure to fill out your email if you are enlisted Ambassadors list.

Best, Erick Guan (talk)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. This is a reminder to fill the address collection. Sorry for the inconvenience if you did submit the form before. If you still wish to receive the postcard from Wikipedia Asian Month, please submit your postal mailing address via this Google form. This form is only accessed by WAM international team. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. If you have problems in accessing the google form, you can use Email This User to send your address to my Email.

If you do not wish to share your personal information and do not want to receive the postcard, please let us know at WAM talk page so I will not keep sending reminders to you. Best, Sailesh Patnaik

Hello again, I believe the earlier message has created some confusion. If you have already submitted the details in the Google form, it has been accepted, you don't need to submit it again. The earlier reminder is for those who haven't yet submitted their Google form or if they any alternate way to provide their address. I apologize for creating the confusion. Thanks-Sailesh Patnaik

As far as I know there was more than one grubbs tram, and also more than one place called comstock and consequently more than one Comstock Tram - - all good funfor the researcher ! JarrahTree 00:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: Thanks for the comment. The other tram was partially built by another guy with the same surname as Grubb's Tramway (Mowbray). Initially, I had hoped to have found a high resolution scan of a photo and a high resolution map of the same tram, but the letters on the tram car gave me a clue, before I uploaded my first version of the article. I hope, everything is accurate by now. it would be interesting to know, whether the tree Grubbs were related to each other. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is hard to know what you can or cannot access, my copy of whitham's work is temporarily out of reach, I am sure there were a number of later tram operations on the west coast were also called grubbs tram as well (just like multiple comstock trams) and not necessarily connected in any way with the mowbray/launceston one. JarrahTree 10:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marrawah Tramway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montagu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello once more.

Now for something completely different. I have attempted to replace the image associated with the above article so that it matches the one in the English version of the article. It appeared to work and I received a welcome note from de.Wikipedia; however, when I open it up it still displays the old image. A friend has opened it and found the same thing.

Can you please tell me what I've done wrongly? Assume I have no German, which isn't far from the truth.

The replacement image is in Wikicommons as "CCLR24.jpg". It appears as such in the text when editing. The old image showed a train with lots of passengers, the new image shows a black loco number 24.

I hope this makes sense.

Kind regards

DaveDavidAHull (talk) 13:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidAHull: On the German Wikipedia, changes by IPs or novices need to be reviewed by experienced users. I happen to have the latter status and reviewed your changes. Thus these changes are highlighted in blue in the history. I see the black #24, and assume you will do by now as well. NearEMPTiness (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When you have a moment, consider indicating whether you support or oppose the candidacy for the Carolwood Pacific Railroad article as a featured article here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Carolwood Pacific Railroad/archive1. Jackdude101 ^talk cont 01:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackdude101: Thanks for asking. I put wrote a short comment. I am currently working on the Miniature Train at Monarch Park and Midland Beach Railway Company, because I found two interesting uncategorized photos on Wikimedia Commons. Do you know, where the train shown in this photo was used? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to Flikr, it's described as the latest design of carsand locomotive. Given that they don't mention a specific location or customer for this locomotive, I believe this was taken at the Armitage Herschell Company headquarters in North Tonawanda, New York, very soon after it was made circa 1891. Side note: this complex run by Armitage Herschell (and later Herschell-Spillman, and Spillman Engineering after that) is different from the complex opened years later in the same town by Alan Herschell after his split with Spillman, which is now the Herschell Carrousel Factory Museum. Jackdude101 ^talk cont 01:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment. By the way: The original text spells cars and locomotive correctly. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template {{

]

@Diannaa: Thank you very much, indeed. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 14:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article James A. Trimble has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability could be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James A. Trimble is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James A. Trimble until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

]

Disneyland Railroad IP edits

Hello. Regarding the edits on the Disneyland Railroad article from that South Carolina-based IP user you saw recently, he is desperately trying to find a source (regardless of its reliability) stating that a fifth locomotive went into service on the Walt Disney World Railroad on March 1, 1997. I gathered some information from page 23 of The Ward Kimball: The Story of Disneyland Engine No. 5 by Steve DeGaetano, which states the following: "Plan B" had Disneyland executives unceremoniously sending the large Davenport to the Magic Kingdom in Florida. The Walt Disney World Railroad, not really needing or wanting a fifth engine, reluctantly went through with plans to officially name and dedicate the locomotive. There was no one in Disney history more deserving than that pioneer rail preservationist and Walt's trusted employee and fellow railfan, Ward Kimball. A small dedication ceremony was held backstage with Ward Kimball in attendance, but after the hoopla, the engine was quietly set aside on the property. It seems as though the engine was deemed too small to pull trains up the WDWRR's slight grades, and it remains in doubt to this day whether the engine ever pulled a train of any kind on the Walt Disney World Railroad. At the Magic Kingdom, it was simply an unwanted orphan. I posted the same quote on the talk page for this IP user. As you can see, the information that this user is trying to post contradicts what this legit published source is stating. I should also note that this same person is the one who drove the WDWRR article into the ground with never-ending unsourced or questionably sourced edits about two years ago, leading to other editors reverting so much of its content that it was briefly changed to a redirect to the Magic Kingdom article. That's when I decided to step in, re-write the WDWRR article, and raise it from a joke to a respected piece of featured content. Even after all these years, this guy is still not getting it. I suggest that whenever you see editing activity on these articles or any similar articles, and they are from an IP user starting with "2606:A000:131B:E9", it's most likely this same person and those edits should be heavily scrutinized. Jackdude101 ^talk cont 13:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackdude101: Thank you for the background information. I will be more vigilant in future. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected the article, but please double check on Google Books or another resource. The main line (whose article I'm working on in my sandbox) became the Interurban Trail, not the Snohomish branch. SounderBruce 23:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: Thank you very much for the improvements, indeed. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miniature Railway Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kangaroo Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingscote (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NZR T class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lyttelton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taruheru River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gisborne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a general note about pinging other editors.

.

FWIW, what type of editor you're dealing with can be hard to figure out sometimes; so, if you ping someone and they get annoyed over it, don't stress out about it. Just file that a way somewhere for future reference and try to avoid doing so again with rspect to that editor unless it's absolutely a necessity. It's also a good idea soemtimes for really important matters where a reply is needed to follow up the ping with a short post on the user's talk page as well since will notice something on their use talk more likely than a ping. In fact, some editors set their preferences so that they do not receive any pings, etc. at all. Finally, as you probably noticed, I didn't ping you in this post, but you still probably received a notifiction about this post up at the top of the page. Pinging an editor on their own user talk page is not really necessary and is also something to remember for future reference. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why? [6] it’s more linguistically incorrect than before. TastyPoutine ^{talk (if you dare)} 19:04, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

Talk:Moscow_Paveletskaya_railway_station#RfC_on_Moscow_railway_stations. I visited the station this morning, and my Russsian friends called it like that in English, probably because of the similar names of the tube station and the square. There were too many different versions in the article, and I propose that we decide what would be best and then define this on the Talk page(s). I am flexible, as long as it is always the same in each article. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Its cool. I started the RFC. The guy that renamed all the articles was banned across various languages. I think they should all be in the masculine. The buildings are called Rizhsky Vokzal, Pavaletsky Vokzal. That’s just facts. People using in the feminine are talking either about the Metro station, which already exists, or the stop on the rail line. And frankly, the guy who renamed all the stations unilaterally got banned already. Why would we ever defer to that level judgement?TastyPoutine ^{talk (if you dare)} 20:38, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead a moved them all except for one that needs an admin. Sorry if I was a bit jerky on the first interaction.TastyPoutine ^{talk (if you dare)} 23:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for photo - there are some pds for the Magnet Tramway that are PD - real live Orenstein and Koppel action as if it was yesterday... but simply havent the time to upload and line the small stub with JarrahTree 00:34, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: Thanks for this information. I uploaded some photos using a tool. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 01:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much for your edits on the magnet tram - I know that mallet freaks look at the magnet tram photos with reverence beyond human comprehension. JarrahTree 07:35, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the H and H Railroad article. I think it would make a fine addition to the Stanwood station DYK that I recently nominated. With your blessing, I'd be glad to include it. SounderBruce 02:37, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: This looks very good, indeed. I have just requested importing the history. By the way: You might be interested in reviewing my Template:Did you know nominations/Paper car wheel. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 08:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

]

Category deletion discussion

I would like to hear your input on the following discussions: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 August 15#Category:Heritage railways in Hong Kong and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 August 15#Category:Heritage railways in Japan. Both are presently occupied exclusively by rail lines in Disney parks. Basically, the nominator for both, Jc86035, wants them deleted because he doesn't think that rail lines run by Disney can be considered heritage railways. I have countered that they in fact do meet the minimum requirements to be considered as such (note the new info I added here: Heritage railway#Definition for reference). Jackdude101 ^talk cont 17:35, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The hook made the all-time lead hook list. Congratulations! Yoninah (talk) 20:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: Thank you very much for making me aware of this. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uintah Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnegie Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NearEMPTiness! About 2 years ago I wrote a biography of a living person article [Chalabyan]. The article has been recently marked as up for deletion. Any advice on why this might be happening, how to address it or what to improve would really be appreciated. Obviously, your vote as an experienced editor on Wiki would really go a long way to make sure it's not deleted.

Thanks in advance for your attention to the matter.

Alice Ananian (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ángeles Franco-López is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ángeles Franco-López until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:13, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to

]

Japanese translations

Hi. Can you help me with this request? Thank you. --79.24.235.16 16:15, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, these are outside my scope of activities. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sousse–Kairouan Decauville railway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sousse–Kairouan Decauville railway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwirkle (talk) 18:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

]

Thank you

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		For your continuing translation efforts! — xaosflux Talk 17:27, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Help copy edit and improvements for article. Thanks you. 58.187.77.36 (talk) 09:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am too busy because of Decauville railways. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NearEMPTiness, I notice you make a lot of transwiki translations, and request a lot of imports at

]

@Xaosflux: Thank you for the information. I wasn't aware of the "transwiki importer" status and will consider both options. Until then, I want to thank you for the excellent work that you do on importing. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:00, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, we very very rarely have a "RfTI" and it is a special process I can help you with if you want to go through it, almost anyone who would need it normally just does RfA, but there are certainly niche cases. Best regards, — xaosflux ^Talk 14:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am generally more active and known on the German Wikipedia. Thus the best procedure might be to become an admin there first. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 14:12, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Autonomous Rail Rapid Transit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autonomous Rail Rapid Transit (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwirkle (talk) 16:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At first I was quite impressed by the content of this article, but I have quickly become aware that most of it has been copied word-for-word from here. The guidelines state that I should contact with you in the first instance. Would you like to explain how this has happened? Crowsus (talk) 13:54, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Crowsus: Thank you very much for your vigilance. I checked the article today and rephrased some of its sentences, as you requested. I double-checked it using the following tools, and believe it is now in line with the relevant guidelines, although the content is clearly based on the sources which are cited in the references:

• Earwig
• Duplicate Detector

I hope that other editors will further improve the article over time, as nothing has been chisseled into stone yet. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akrofuom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Hudson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited River Torrens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tramway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NearEMPTiness,

Thanks for adding images to articles. Can you please check the Talk pages to see if there are any "Image requested" templates and remove these if they are present? So far, I have removed templates from the following pages - Talk:Long Plains, South Australia, Talk:Sleaford Bay, Talk:Pelorus Islet and Talk:Long Plains, South Australia.

Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 10:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cowdy001: Thanks for this hint and your work so far. I wasn't aware of these templates. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:57, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

With this edit, all you left in the edit summary field was a url, which does nothing to help explain the changes you made, but does interfere with the watchlist. In the future, if you could just add something like "archiving url", or "fixing ref", that would be more helpful. With that said, that ref already had an archive url included. There was no need to change the original url by adding another archive url in it's place. -

]

Thank you for the helpful comment. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon sir. I enjoyed todays webinar on Friction Stir Welding. Good to see fellow engineers active on Wikipedia.--AT44 (talk) 12:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AT44: Thank you for your feedback. Most of my Wikipedia articles are actually in German as shown on de:User:NearEMPTiness. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For Ledesma Mill Railway (Desvio Ingenio Ledesma) in List of secondary, industrial and Decauville railways in Argentina, where did you get the 0.51 m gauge? I was unable to find it in the source that you provided. Peter Horn User talk 18:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Horn: Thanks for asking. I read "0.51 meter" in this Document on the third entry of the page, which is -13- (at the top) and -14c- at the bottom. Do you think it should more likely to be read as "0.61 meter"? You could just search for "Ledesma" in the left column of that document. The number "6" looks significantl different on this typewriter. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

0.61 m gauge may possibly the right choice. That said, I was able to find 0.65 m gauge Peter Horn User talk 20:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I updated all track gauges on the article by using template:track gauge]], eg 1,000 mm (3 ft 3+3⁄8 in) Peter Horn User talk 20:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

508 mm (20.0 in) may have been meant. {{Track gauge|20in|first=metric}} 508 mm (20 in) That said, please look at Template talk:Track gauge#650 mm. A certain user questions the reliability of the single source that you used to compose the article. Your chance to defend the source. Peter Horn User talk 17:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for converting the dimensions to imperial and for sharing the link to the discussion. Decauville has been criticised that during the construction of the Panama Canal, 600 mm and 2 ft rolling stock was used on the same track and that some waggons even had different axles with 600 mm and 2 ft gauge. The actual gauge was often different to the nominal gauge. Therefore, I am not too worried about a few millimetres in old literature, which might been caused by conversion errors or different measuring methods. In Sweden, for instance, some railway lines have been specified and built by measuring the distance from the centre to the centre of the rails instead of measuring the geuge. I still think that the US document is a delightful source, to start with, but I hope that the article will be further improved based on other publications. Please check the German article de:Liste der Schmalspurbahnen in Argentinien, which is more comprehensive and has some photos. I would be delighted if you add some photos and convert the length to miles to the English article. NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Narrow-gauge railways in China, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Canton, Kirin and Beitang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

]

Please don´t make further

Fram (talk) 19:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Final warning.

]

Autopatrolled revoked

In relation to the above, I looked more deeply into your editing history and saw that several of your articles have been deleted.

]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you very much for this beautiful gem. NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orenstein & Koppel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jabłonna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NearEMPTiness. Thank you for your work on

, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Can you provide origanal reliable sources? Peter Horn User talk 15:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NearEMPTiness. Thank you for your work on

, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:11, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orenstein & Koppel

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Orenstein & Koppel, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Haoreima (talk) 12:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article

because of the following concern:

This article is named after a (likely) tongue-in-cheek photo caption, which incorrectly identifies the location of a railway line and sawmill to be in the sanddune country near Oroua Downs, Manawatu. No sources other than someone's photo caption are cited. The website which hosts the photo notes the caption is incorrect, and that the location of the photo is in the Waikato.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Decauville factory in Petite-Synthe

Hello, NearEMPTiness,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Wikisteveb4, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Decauville factory in Petite-Synthe for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wikisteveb4}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wikisteveb4 (talk) 21:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... and still ticking. Thanks a lot for celebrating this anniversary with me. NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]