User talk:Oganguly

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Black Kite (talk) 19:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In all fairness, I put it back up a second after the talk started. You're very quick to accuse me of edit-warring, however.

talk) 19:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

I was warning you so you didn't get blocked - you did the right thing. Black Kite (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@

@Catfurball: Here you go!

Code	Result
{{User:SportsFan007/UserBoxes/Minerals}}	This user collects Minerals	Usage

SportsFan007 (talk) 23:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)SportsFan007[reply]

@

]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE H*10^8.5 (talk) 17:05, 18 April 2019 (UTC) Hi Ornov!!!!!![reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	epic H*10^8.5 (talk) 17:14, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: using an IPA wedge in Rivers Cuomo's name instead of a schwa, and the wrong I, and an S instead of a Z. 115.70.7.33 (talk) 08:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@

talk) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove

and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

---

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

This likes Aloha shirts.Catfurball (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@

Thanks for making the userboxes for me Bug2266, keep up the good work.

Catfurball (talk) 16:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the Italian translation of the COINTELPRO page. I entrust it to you, in the hope that you can verify and publish it, perhaps asking for help to someone from the wikipedia community (an American Citizen who he can speak native Italian). In Italy nobody knows COINTELPRO, for several reasons, not just ignorance, but for fear. Good luck.

https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COINTELPRO&oldid=106874991

This user likes Sundials. Please use photograph File:Kew Gardens 0502.JPG.Catfurball (talk) 22:19, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here's to you on your birthday, Bug2266! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!--PATH SLOPU 12:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Bug2266, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!--PATH SLOPU 12:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bug226,

the article Fuente Álamo de Murcia is rated as Stub-Class, but it has been quitely expanded and I'd like it to be reassessed.

I thank the time you devote to the message.

Regards,

--Yolanda95 (talk) 13:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Yolanda95[reply]

@

talk) 17:10, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 20:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

The article

The article Crito you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Crito for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bug2266!

		Exploration of the Unknown
		I hereby award you the Exploration of the Unknown award! You are being recognized for your courage and willingness to test a feature, gadget, or tool in development and for the constructive feedback you provided.

Thanks for taking the time to participate in the user feedback round for our desktop improvements prototype. This feedback is super valuable to us and is currently being used to determine our next steps. We have published a report gathering the main takeaways from the feedback and highlighting the changes we’ll make based on this feedback. Please take a look and give us your thoughts on the talk page of the report. To learn more about the project overall and the other features we’re planning on building in the future, check out the main project page.

SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have greatly misunderstood, I did not blank the article at all. I simply removed the section on a figure that didn't qualify for the definition of the article. Someone who tried to undo that removal before claimed that it was properly sourced and the source provided the justification for including that leader. This was a false claim, as the "source" was in fact a short RT opinion piece. Thus, the justification fell apart and the section on that leader was correctly removed, as he does not qualify for the definition of the article.

That was a paragraph. A paragraph comprising of more than one sentence, and definitely more than one citation. I have since removed that RT source, so if you have any other problems I would suggest you bring it to the talk page.

talk) 21:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,513		Indian cuisine (talk)	Add sources
1,081		Austro-Prussian War (talk)	Add sources
392		Khoa (talk)	Add sources
64		Revilo P. Oliver (talk)	Add sources
15		Macelj massacre (talk)	Add sources
14		Mario Bros. II (talk )	Add sources
124		Uruguayan cuisine (talk)	Cleanup
31		Penn Square Bank (talk)	Cleanup
707		International Security Assistance Force (talk)	Cleanup
261		Kaizo Mario World (talk)	Expand
38,091		talk )	Expand
58		Les Identitaires (talk)	Expand
67		Kapisa Province (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
72		School refusal (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
37		New musicology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,138		Peanut butter (talk)	Merge
23		Conceptual dictionary (talk)	Merge
21		Baru seed (talk )	Merge
178		Massacre of Novgorod (talk)	Wikify
116		Sustainability reporting (talk)	Wikify
286		Five Races Under One Union (talk)	Wikify
4		Altazores (talk)	Orphan
13		Salem Ben Nasser Al-Ismaily (talk)	Orphan
3		Sin Perdón (talk)	Orphan
21		Storetveit Church (talk)	Stub
139		Dungeon synth (talk)	Stub
24		The Garin Death Ray (talk)	Stub
27		Syrup (novel) (talk)	Stub
3		talk )	Stub
909		Nyaa Torrents (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bug2266 I have made some edits which you have been reverting even after providing proper citations. The honourable Supreme Court has clearly addressed the Central government that there is a need of introduction of creamy layer even in ST/SC reservations. This is because after gettting reservation in undergraduation -> postgraduation -> jobs and further in promotion (used to happen a month back), this person transfers all the benefits of reservation to his/her child and this vicious cycle continues for generations. As this person is capable of earning a living and leading a respectable life, this benefit should now be taken from him/her so that other underpriveleged people from that same community can actually avail reservation (not just theoretically but practically as well). This is because the child of a poor ST/SC who cannot afford expensive coachings just cannot compete with the child of class A officer (who himself availed reservation) who can afford best coaching institutes in the country. This way the effluent ST/SC's are actually siphoning off majority of the benefits of reservation from the underpriveleged ones of the same community in whose name reservations are actually taken. In order for these benefits to percolate to the needy, the effluent beneficiaries should no longer be entitled to reservation and this is what i had been trying to write. But due to political reasons the Central government is not ready to change this and introduce income limit for availing ST/SC reservation.

Please try to understand and discuss before editing the page again and again. You are always welcome to talk. Let us not indulge in an endless edit war. You can convey the same meaning by rewriting the paragraph but dont simply delete facts which are true. Please refer the following citations.

^[1]

^[2]

^[3]

talk) 18:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the

]

India 10,000 challenge

Hello Oganguly. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}} Thanks, talk) 10:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

I closed

Yeah, I misused the UI. Thank you. I don't suppose it would be too late to open a correct one at the risk of looking like an idiot?

talk) 02:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Oganguly. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ~ Amkgp 💬 14:45, 14 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bug2266, I've updated the

The article Adam Ragusea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article largely fails to establish a significance, as well as very heavily relying on primary sources, most often sourcing his own Youtube videos. I'm familiar with and fond (lol) of his work, but I don not believe he meets

WP:N

, at least at the moment.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NekomancerJaidyn (talk) [she/her] 23:42, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday! Hi Bug2266! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 15:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Ragusea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Ragusea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarysandy (talk) 22:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]