User talk:Roland zh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

[Hi, again, after DE-WP, also increasingly related to Wikimedia Commons, just uploads so needed, as well as and so meaningful South India related edits in strictly reduced dimensions – after eight years contributions frustrated day by day about increasing toleration, imho even silently support of vandalism/mobbing/trolling by parts of the present Wikimedia Commons (WC) administratorship... as part of longtime line of an accordingly 'list' of 'reasons' please see closing: no mediation asked for, even even not a single answer by WC admins Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems between 15 January and 21 January 2015... not for the first time as mentioned. Notwithstanding that, please still have fun, Roland zh (talk) 11:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC) :-))] Error: {{Lang-xx}}: text has italic markup (help)[reply]

Edit of AdyaPrasad Pandey Page

Hello Dear Mr. Roland zh this is to informa you that Adya Prasad Pandey is not a vice chancellor of College and University he is a Vice Chancellor of Manipur University which is a Central University like Banaras Hindu University and Aligarh Muslim University as Central University includes some colleges but they are constituent colleges run by University so requesting you to move back to Vice Chancellor of Indian University.

Fahr Abbey

Thank you for putting the title back. I realized that I had made an error due to the uniqueness of its organization and was trying to make that correction. Daniel the Monk (talk) 20:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Amartyabag TALK2ME 02:57, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gilmore Girls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reunion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm DGG. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Rotpunktverlag, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 02:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Predigerkirche_Zürich: commonly shortend to Predigern

Please check out: Talk:Predigerkirche_Zürich#commonly shortend to Predigern -- ZH8000 (talk) 07:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Who Killed Johnny

The article Who Killed Johnny has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability? Minimal sourcing. See connected articles.While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - CorbieV 23:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]


> Talk:Who Killed Johnny November 19, 2014
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status
Your image, File:Opernhaus Zürich - Sechseläutenplatz 2013-08-31 18-30-40.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 13:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Photo requests

Whenever you come back from your break, let me know if you are interested in having photo requests done. Thanks! WhisperToMe (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thx but no need for, as well for Wikimedia Common, kr Roland zh (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 01:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi Doniago, thx but no need to do so again from my side. So you are interested in, please refer to Tina Huang ;-) Kindly regards Roland zh (talk) 01:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CIRCULAR. What you should do is find an appropriate citation used in that article and copy it. DonIago (talk) 03:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ilana Rapp

Hello Roland zh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ilana Rapp for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 01:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's

paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
to grant license.

LeadSongDog come howl! 19:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Roland,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Opernhaus Zürich - Sechseläutenplatz 2013-08-31 18-30-40.JPG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 9, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-10-09. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Nice page for Alfred Rasser

  Olowe2011 Talk 23:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ongkingco

It's not a disambiguation, because it lists only one person.Xx236 (talk) 07:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for the tireless effort to improve categories in Kerala province of India. Prof TPMS (talk) 01:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt

I've a doubt as why we use | and spacing after the city name category? Like these edit1, edit2--Vin09(talk) 07:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Vin09, sorry for the delay: [Category:xxxxx| ] is imho (very frequently) used to sort the main article of category tree at the 'pole position' of the related category tree, among others geographical locations, countries, populated places, districts etc. That's why I 'sorted' Visakhapatnam similiarly. Feel free to resort, no problem. Kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Hi Roland,

can you add Keshav Bansal's pic to this article.

Cheers Aj Ajayprakashyadav (talk) 16:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FTN notice

A plate of Jalebi for you
Here is a plate of
Bangaldesh
. Hope you'll like it. Great work categorising India-related articles
Thank you.

Pratyush (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.

Support
ping me[reply
]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Sir thank you very much.

Regards Anika Gupta (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Angelo Parera..66 (talk) 09:30, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Roland zh. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ilana Rapp for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilana Rapp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilana Rapp until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 02:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category wikignoming (spring 2016 to spring 2018)

Removal of Indian cricketers category

Hi. Please do not remove this category from biographies of Indian cricketers. This category is included on all articles of Indian cricketers. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the information, and I do not plan further sports-related categorization, in fact just a handful Kerala-related "Kerala cricketers" some hours ago imho were affected. Primarly South-Indian and India-people categories will be maintained on occasion of an unique maintainance task related to the {Category diffuse} tag. btw: to avoid future misinterpretations related to "Indian cricketers", it may be helpful to remove {Category diffuse}, thanks, Roland zh (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Beaches in Kozhikode district has been nominated for discussion

Category:Beaches in Kozhikode district, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American women of Indian descent in politics has been nominated for discussion

Category:American women of Indian descent in politics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 04:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-diffusing categories

When you make new categories for people restricted by gender within a larger non-gender-restricted category (such as your new

WP:DUPCAT for more detailed guidance. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi, thank you for the information and taking care, and i'll continue as you recommended, kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 22:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian male architects has been nominated for discussion

Category:Indian male architects, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ELEKHHT 23:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American cricketers of Indian descent has been nominated for discussion

Category:American cricketers of Indian descent, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. IgnorantArmies (talk) 14:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20th/21st century categories of people

You should be aware that there's a consensus against the creation of people categories for the 20th and 21st centuries, see eg Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_March_8#Journalists_by_century. It's not a particularly distinctive way of categorising people as the vast majority of biographies fall into such categories.Le Deluge (talk) 12:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I see, same 'rights' for all... as you started minutes ago Category:20th-century photographers by nationality, Category:21st-century Honduran people, for instance. and btw: judges are jurists, and that 21st-cat I did not start ;-) seasons greetings, Roland zh (talk) 13:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC).  Comment: my last topic-related category was started some days ago, i. e. my tiny task to establish 20/21century categories is done, Roland zh (talk) 13:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bengali lyricists]] has been nominated for discussion

Category:Bengali lyricists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:37, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian male television directors has been nominated for discussion

Category:Indian male television directors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: @ your attention because not mentioned but listed at the same entry:

Some Indian male occupations

Propose merging
Each of the nominated categories has an equivalent "Indian female fooers" (or "Indian women fooers") counterpart: C:Indian female television producers, C:Indian female television directors, C:Indian female film directors, C:Indian female cinematographers, C:Indian female filmmakers, C:Indian female contemporary artists, C:Indian female choreographers, C:Indian female television presenters, C:Indian female fashion designers, C:Indian female mountain climbers.

... 178.197.224.94 (talk) 13:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian male film producers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Indian male film producers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent categories, in fact Category:Jurists from Kolkata

Hi Roland zh

Please do not remove articles from existing categories to place them in non-existent categories, as you did in these 2 edits: [1][2]. Both edits used WP:HotCat, so you would have been aware that the categories did not exist.

Thanks. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BrownHairedGirl, hmm, as usual and done (lots of) before, I'll planed to start Category:Jurists from Kolkata the day after these just two wikis were categorized, but according to my contributions I was offline for urgent reasons for (just) three short days ... :) thx that you did start them (I guess), Roland zh (talk) 20:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, again, I guessed good faith by contacting me, but reverting instead of to start, hmm, What goes around, comes around :-(( Roland zh (talk) 20:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Roland, there's no need to be snarky. You removed articles from a category which actually exists, and placed them in non-existent categories. After categorising those articles, you did several other edits, so you could have created the category before continuing. Instead, you left the categ as a redlink, which is an error, so I reverted, and I took the trouble to notify you politely.
I didn't create the category myself because I didn't think it was a good idea. Having looked at, I still don't think it's a good idea, so will nominate it for merger. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jurists from Kolkata has been nominated for discussion

Category:Jurists from Kolkata, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:57, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Indian sportswomen etc etc

==Category:20th-century sportspeople has been nominated for discussion==

Category:20th-century sportspeople, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hm, and also 'affected', ref Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_January_12 :( :
==== 20th/21st-century sportspeople ====
[quotation start:]
... Propose deleting and salting:
Propose salting:
[quotation end.]
Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC) [edited Roland zh (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)][reply]

Category:20th-century Indian women politicians has been nominated for discussion

Category:20th-century Indian women politicians, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century Indian women politicians has been nominated for discussion

Category:21st-century Indian women politicians, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for visiting my page Dr. Praveen Tiwari. Regards Yavarai (talk) 11:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use uploads

Orphaned non-free image File:Michele Ongkingo as 'Olivia' on 'Gilmore Girls' 7.4.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Charles Lewinsky im Gespräch - SRF1 - 2013-03-06 for EN-WP.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Charles Lewinsky im Gespräch - SRF1 - 2013-03-06 for EN-WP.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Idara Victor as 'Nina Holiday' on 'Rizzoli & Isles' 5.08.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Idara Victor as 'Nina Holiday' on 'Rizzoli & Isles' 5.08.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:51, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Helen Pai - Gilmore Girls Staffel 7 'A Day at the Set with Keiko Agena' 05 Min 10 Sek.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Helen Pai - Gilmore Girls Staffel 7 'A Day at the Set with Keiko Agena' 05 Min 10 Sek.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:09, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{di-replaceable fair use disputed|completley disagree, being an 'old hand' Wikimedia Commons user since 2006, since there's no chance to find a 'free image': Helen Pai is a women television writer and backstage crew who's avoiding every public appearances. No Gxxle pix at all, and all the GG backstage footage on DVD (1-7) of the 2000's contained just this one short sequence which I used for that snap. 100% not replacable by 'free content', hence, Non-free media information and use rationale for Helen Pai, Roland zh (talk) 11:09, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Tina Huang as 'Susie Chang' on 'Rizzoli & Isles' 5.16.png

Thanks for uploading File:Tina Huang as 'Susie Chang' on 'Rizzoli & Isles' 5.16.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Rowena King as 'Celeste Newman' on 'Grey's Anatomy' 3.21.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rowena King as 'Celeste Newman' on 'Grey's Anatomy' 3.21.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polo Hofer (1945-2017).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Polo Hofer (1945-2017).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Leyo 21:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Polo Hofer (1945-2017).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Roland zh, If you have any other ideas to demonstrate notability, it would be useful. All best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 20:49, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is settled now. All best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 11:49, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Rédacteur Tibet:, I was sorry to read the topic (was EN-WP offline the past two days), but so much the better to hear that that absurd DR is settled now :-) Kindly regards and all me best wishes also for your dedicated contributions, Roland zh (talk) 17:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. Your Sonam Dolma Brauen is excellent. I have found some intresting new references:
All the very best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 17:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and many thanks, also for the references :-) For the time being i'm just wikignoming (India-related, scheduled by early 2018), but will 'enhance' Sonam Dolma Brauen's, and some more wikis 'asap'. Kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 17:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cup of tea for you!

Thank you for your exceptional works regarding categories on Wikipedia. Gazal world (talk) 12:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gazal world (talk) 12:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gazal world, I appreciate your motivational words (and a cup of tea) very much; as far by assummably spring 2018 i'll try to do my best by categorizing India-related biographies. thank you very much and kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 18:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest category

Hello, how are you. Can you please suggest me the suitable category for a person who died from heart attack. Thank you. Gazal world (talk) 21:13, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gazal world, offline mainly ;-) and hoping your fine, too, thank you: not my usual 'field', but guess it's a subcategory of Category:Deaths by cause (Myocardial infarction?), kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hello Roland. Thank you for your fantastic work with adding categories to wikipedia articles. Kindness88 (talk) 07:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC) Kindness88[reply]

Hello Kindness88, thank you very much, and you're welcome. btw: that form of temporarly wikignoming started in early 2016 probably will end in spring 2018, then, reducing on my usual fields and assumably still categorizing Category:South Indian content. Happy editing and kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Roland zh.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Insertcleverphrasehere, thank you, but I suppose my English level as too bad to do a serious job as reviewer. Kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Roland zh. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
this is for your work on India related articles... Adamstraw99 (talk) 21:47, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

You are Most Welcome

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:09, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Welcome. Let's have a Beer. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:41, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Roland zh! Can you add category:Indian pop-folk singers in articles Yo Yo Honey Singh and Devi Sri Prasad? Thank you! --92.100.192.202 (talk) 14:45, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for populating [:category:Indian pop-folk singers], and you're welcome, is done, kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 22:04, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shivnath Mishra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shivnath Mishra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivnath Mishra (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Since you edited the page earlier, I thought I should notify you. Shobhit102 | talk  09:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stadtpolizei Zürich listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Stadtpolizei Zürich. Since you had some involvement with the Stadtpolizei Zürich redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Raymond1922 (talk) 23:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Category:People associated with Archaeological Survey of India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:08, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:8th-century Indian women writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unneeded non-diffusing subcategory with only 1 article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. DannyS712 (talk) 07:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Roland zh. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicole Rubio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicole Rubio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Rubio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 11:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 01:06, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:11, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of S21 (ZVV)

Hello, Roland zh,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged S21 (ZVV) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:14, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coop has been nominated for deletion

Category:Coop, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 08:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian women autobiographers has been nominated for merging

Category:Indian women autobiographers, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 14:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian women biographers has been nominated for merging

Category:Indian women biographers, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 14:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American male journalists of Indian descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 15:18, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American women journalists of Indian descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 15:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American sportswomen of Indian descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 17:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Category:American film score composers of Indian descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 21:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American male scientists of Indian descent has been nominated for discussion

Category:American male scientists of Indian descent has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 09:51, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American women scientists of Indian descent has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 09:51, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion
, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scientists of Indian descent has been nominated for discussion

Category:Scientists of Indian descent has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 18:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American businessmen of Indian descent has been nominated for merging to Category:American businesspeople of Indian descent. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 16:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American men of Indian descent in health professions has been nominated for merging to Category:American people of Indian descent in health professions. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 16:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American men of Indian descent has been nominated for merging

Category:American men of Indian descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Male social workers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Male social workers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:19, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:50, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Kerri Smith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NACTOR
– actress who does only guest and supporting roles, and no major or significant roles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribstalk) 13:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Little Lights Free Education High School
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Little Lights Free Education High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Lights Free Education High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Thryduulf (talk) 16:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 20:07, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:03, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People associated with the Indus Valley civilisation has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:58, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian dramatists and playwrights by language has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian journalists by language has been nominated for merging

Category:Indian journalists by language has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Businesswomen from Goa has been nominated for merging

talk 17:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian Marxist poets has been nominated for deletion

Category:Indian Marxist poets has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 21:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 13:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 02:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 00:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 00:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian patent holders has been nominated for merging

Category:Indian patent holders has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian male fashion designers has been nominated for merging

Category:Indian male fashion designers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:14th-century Indian translators has been nominated for merging

Category:14th-century Indian translators has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:16th-century Indian translators has been nominated for merging

Category:16th-century Indian translators has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American women health professionals of Indian descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century Indian film directors has been nominated for splitting

Category:19th-century Indian film directors has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9 § Women foos on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2nd-century Indian non-fiction writers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:3rd-century Indian non-fiction writers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:4th-century Indian non-fiction writers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:5th-century Indian non-fiction writers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:6th-century Indian non-fiction writers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:7th-century Indian novelists has been nominated for splitting

Category:7th-century Indian novelists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:44, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:10th-century Indian politicians has been nominated for merging

Category:10th-century Indian politicians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian optometrists has been nominated for splitting

Category:Indian optometrists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:8th-century Indian medical doctors has been nominated for splitting

Category:8th-century Indian medical doctors has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:7th-century Indian medical doctors has been nominated for merging

Category:7th-century Indian medical doctors has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian independence activists from Bangladesh has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:15th-century Indian politicians has been nominated for merging

Category:15th-century Indian politicians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian scientific authors has been nominated for splitting

Category:Indian scientific authors has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian independence activists from Punjab, India has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:7th-century Indian biographers has been nominated for splitting

Category:7th-century Indian biographers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:9th-century Indian biographers has been nominated for merging

Category:9th-century Indian biographers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian independence activists from Pakistan has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]