User talk:Saga City

Hi. As a major contributor to List of lost settlements in the United Kingdom, you might be interested to see a discussion that's just opened on "How to Write about... Deserted Medieval Villages" at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements. GrindtXX (talk) 02:35, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't sure what to do with this when I was cleaning up the page, so I dumped it on the disambiguation page. Definitely the wrong place to put it, and I apologize. But even if it doesn't belong there, it doesn't seem like deleting it entirely is a very responsible thing to do. Now information on this subject with this meaning does not appear anywhere in Wikipedia. So I am dumping it again, this time on your talk page.

It is also a safe breaking (safe cracking) tool from the Victorian era, consisting of a heavy brass stock with two sets of barrels, the large one on top and the small one below. The device was clamped to the frame of the safe's door. A large steel screw would then be driven into the safe's lock, or between the safe's door and its frame. Either the frame buckled or the lock failed as the pressure exerted by the device was reputedly up-to three tons.

Thank you for your understanding. DAVilla (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is a dictionary definition and as such belongs in Wiktionary - which is why I added a link to wiktionary. I'll try to find sufficient citations to get it in there but have to say that Wiktionary has very strict entry criteria so it may not be possible. Do you know of any citations that would help? If so add them here. I must confess I've never heard of the term used in the sense given. Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 19:51, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing the leg work. It sounds like it doesn't deserve its own page, which is something else I had wondered.

I'm much more active on Wiktionary than here. Add the information you have to Wiktionary:Citations:jack-in-the-box and I'll format it and add a definition. DAVilla (talk) 16:15, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Tourist Guiding until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hradec substation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saxonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marc Maiffret has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

May not meet notability standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tudweiliog, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Counties of Wales and Arable (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Social enterprise, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 22:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wenke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wenche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Delany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anne of Great Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Delany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meshach Browning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Backwoods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I added it to Category:Temporary maintenance holdings is that there's a system bug such that whenever someone converts a soft redirect into a real article (which is what happened in the edit I reverted immediately before that), even after it gets reverted back to a redirect again the system tools stop bypassing it like they usually do with soft redirects. Instead, they start treating the page as an uncategorized article, picking it up on all the maintenance tools that the categorization project uses to do its work — and once that's happened there's no other way to make the page ever drop from the uncategorized articles list (null edits don't work, deleting and restoring the page doesn't work, etc.) except by finding a way to actually "categorize" it.

The uncategorized article tools have to be kept clean, and we can't leave the article sitting as a permanent speedbump that has to be perennially worked around. We have to do whatever we have to do to make sure the page stays off the uncats list, because bots or inexperienced users who work with the uncat tools will sometimes end up actually tagging it in error. And that's why Category:Temporary maintenance holdings even exists in the first place — there are a few types of issues where we can't file a page in normal content categories, but still have to do something to prevent the other problems that arise from leaving it uncategorized. So at least until the bug actually gets fixed, the page does have to be added to the maintenance category.

Trust me, I don't go around adding that category willy-nilly to every soft redirect under the sun — I added it to that specific page because it's actually causing a specific problem that can't yet be fixed any other way. Bearcat (talk) 18:31, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From the documentation for the template:

Do not use this template on disambiguation pages that contain a list of people by family name. Instead categorize the disambiguation page by including the surname parameter with the {{Disambiguation}} template. For example, {{Disambiguation|surname}}. This will include the disambiguation page in Category:Surnames.

Regards. older ≠ wiser 15:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicholas Size, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I just noticed this edit of yours. Unfotunately, this edit caused this edit. While life peerages were introduced in 1958, Law life peerages were introduced in 1876, so I reverted both edits. Thank you.--

You're welcome. Simply south...... cooking letters for just 7 years 16:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit in 2007 you added several place names, including Bridge Field. An article has now been created, but it's only a stub and there's not enough information to identify its location. I've tried maps and search engines and could only find a business and a similarly named farm in different parts of Cumbria. Do you have a source for the list? Peter James (talk) 14:44, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The source for the list is http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/europe/uk/england/county/cumbria/index.htm - however I don't recommend it! I was using it to flesh out county lists but it has too many places that have little or no other information available. Possibly because of the nature of its geography Cumbria was the hardest of the 3 or 4 counties I tried to use it for, before abandoning the exercise. I tried to omit places that had no other Wikipedia presence; but either Bridge Field was an error on my part or its substantiating other link has been deleted. S a g a C i t y (talk) 15:26, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the

As there have been no comments to object to a removal of this article and no added information to show it is a distinct notable settlement for over a year I have added a prompt for deletion. Best. Acabashi (talk) 03:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi..i've noticed you had made substantial edits to the Bafta best actor article, so i'm drawing your attention to the shambles that is the BAFTA Award for Best Actress in a Leading Role article. The user HesioneHushabye (talkpage here talk) has persisted in providing false information about the award; the user has ignored the fact there were TWO categories (Best British Actress, Best Foreign Actress) from 1952 to 1967, has ommitted Best British Actress (not only is that wrong, but the reason; "the award is defunct".....errr...so is "Best Foreign Actress", which he not only kept in, but put it among the "Best Actress" award which was created in 1968 when both British and Foreign awards were merged). I restored the correct information that existed on the page prior to his arbitrary intervention. I assumed good faith edits at the beginning and explained the best actress article should provide the same correct information that the BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role does. The user has arbitrarily made up his own category (best foreign actress as being "best actress") ignoring the official Bafta site itself which I provided. An awards table is not up for discussion, it's black and white; arbitrarily deciding personal criteria (which is what the user has done) has no place on an awards table. — Chie one (talk) 06:35, 11 Jan 2014 The user above wishes to make mere cosmetic changes to the page that are not needed, all of this is clearly explained at the top of the page and has been the same format with no other editors having problems with it for a long time. The user above is mis-interpreting the history of the awards and the information on the page. The nominees and winners for "Best British Actress" are indeed listed, on their own separate page. The page does not have to mirror the Best Actor page. HesioneHushabye (talk) 05:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Err.. why not have "Best Foreign Actress" on it's own "separate page"?. As I said, an awards table is not up for discussion, it's black and white; arbitrarily deciding personal criteria (which is what the user has done) has no place on an awards table. The page was unchanged for years and provided the same correct information as Bafta for best actor did...until the users arbitrary intervention. To have Best foreign actress (which is also defunct by the way) alongside best actress is wrong. Bafta's official site or a wiki user making up their own criteria? hmmm. The Best actor page has it correct, there is no misinformation or made up criteria. — Chie one (talk) 07:10, 11 Jan 2014

Your reasoning makes no sense. it's purely cosmetic. Having them separate makes the page cleaner and less confusing and it's all outlined at the top of the page. The information on the BAFTA site and what's on the page are infact the same. Your whining about the pages being separate is silly and no other users or editors have complained since I created the new pages and tables a long time ago. HesioneHushabye (talk) 07:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

]

Nomination of

Drins

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Leyo 22:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banburyshire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Balloch Country Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Travis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurghada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scuba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saga City, you might have noticed that I reverted your recent edits to this article. I did this because your version makes the article repetitive and it removes some of the sources. Please, if you're going to make these kinds of edits, bring it to the talk page first, as per Wikipedia policy. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:04, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Highgate Wood telephone exchange may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Wood]] by members from Joint Electronic Research Council (JERC).{{efn|The JERC was formed in 1956) and consisted of<br />the British Post Office ([[General Post Office|GPO]])<br />[[Siemens

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

The article

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crowfield Airfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gliders. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leesthorpe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Somersby. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cairnryan Harbour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlisle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Saga City. I can't see how the change you made in this edit has manifested in the article; could you illuminate? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On my screen it split the list of references into 3 columns rather than 1. However, as I understand it, the effect depends on the size of the font, the width of the screen and any picture so it is thus preferable to the cruder Reflist|2 or Reflist|3 that forces the number of columns. As I'm no techie this is the best answer I can give, but hope it clarifies things. S a g a C i t y (talk) 08:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following this up - I've been 'playing' with font sizes on the Yetminster page. Increasing the size of the font reduces the number of columns; unsurprisingly reducing the size of the font increases the number of columns. So it seems I was right. S a g a C i t y (talk) 08:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Both versions look the same on my screen with my preferences (actually I've never altered my preferences, so they must be on a default setting). Presumably when more refs are added in that article, at some point the list will split on my screen too, even if I don't change font size... PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 09:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Frederick Markham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dedham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heath Charnock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adlington railway station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You participated in the previous Persondata RfC. I just wanted to notify you that a new RfC regarding the methodical removal of Persondata is taking place at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Thanks, —

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Bundled together at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deanery of Alresford DBD 20:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the hundred of Kilmersdon, you'll see it includes Buckland Dinham. But West Buckland is 50 miles away on the other side of Somerset and is not related to Buckland Dinham at all. The source you've reinstated actually says that West Buckland is in Kingsbury hundred. I'm reverting your reversion. Johnlp (talk) 09:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, You did it yourself. Thanks. Johnlp (talk) 09:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Hello. This is a quick note to let you know that the results of the UK wikimeet survey have now been posted on Meta at m:UK Wikimeet survey 2015. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:03, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Post-imperial Latin poets, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wales castle stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dawynn (talk) 18:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plash (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article IVV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page started out as a redirect to Volksmarching. It was then changed to a DAB page when iShares was added. Later IVV (Business) was added saying it was a part of Balfour Beatty. Volksmarching was the first one removed. None of the three pages that have been on the DAB page actually contain "IV". I can not find anywhere to redirect this to and it doesn't meet the need for a DAB page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IVV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IVV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- GB fan 18:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice" - so I did! Please see talk page for explanation, as requested. S a g a C i t y (talk) 18:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you did and I took it to the next step which is

WP:AFD. The discussion is now taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IVV. -- GB fan 18:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Saga City. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You say you have one called SagaCity. Sorry, but I've just deleted a user page User:SagaCity as that user isn't registered. If you actually create an account for it, I can restore the page on request. (PS the User:Hiram K Hackenbacker account is registered and is OK.) Peridon (talk) 16:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rigmarole (Filipino band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rigmarole (Filipino band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You started the article on the topic Pocket park, but back in 2004, when inclusion standards were a lot less stringent.

How much interest do you have in this article today?

In a recent comment at

I thought I would leave you a heads-up. Geo Swan (talk) 04:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Selston (surname). Since you had some involvement with the Selston (surname) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

]

Nomination of

Biked

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biked until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_areas_of_London#Cleanup_request Huskion (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saga City. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saga City. AS one of Wikipedia's most experienced editors, Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. ~~~~

Hello, Saga City. AfC submissions Random submission 3+ months 2,848 pending submissions Purge to update t e I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 01:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your input on the Yeomanry->Yeomanry Cavalry page move request. It's clear that this was an inappropriate move and I've withdrawn the request. I do, however, believe that separate articles are justified and, following a discussion with one of the other contributors to the page move discussion, have begun a discussion about reverting the Yeomanry article to its original state, and splitting off the work I have done into a separate Yeomanry Cavalry article. I would welcome your opinion on this. Factotem (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Category:Social enterprise, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:30, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saga City. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bazoo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG

. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Dunn (screenwriter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Dunn (screenwriter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saga City. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:25, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Circus proprietors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and has unsourced content, according to

Do not create

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Of Valence Aymer. Since you had some involvement with the Of Valence Aymer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:23, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Saling (disambiugation) should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Saling (disambiugation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Birkby, Cumbria. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 23#Birkby, Cumbria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Devokewater @ 11:21, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

Hi. I'm contacting you because you wrote a comment about the above article seven years ago (!!), on the off-chance that you may still be interested. The Aycliff article appears to have been deleted on the grounds of non-notability. But it now appears that it could be of historical interest, if rewritten for that aspect (see my comment in the above link). Storye book (talk) 17:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Storye book: I can't remember exactly what the resolution was on former settlements (usually called Deserted Medieval Villages) but feel that, individually, they weren't considered notable S a g a C i t y 17:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a deserted medieval village. It's a council estate built around 1950. I had thought that it was totally demolished, leaving nothing behind, but it appears that it was partially demolished for the new dual carriageway in 1985, because Geograph has at least one picture of what's left of it taken one year ago. It also had the stationmaster's house, which became the King Lear pub, which in turn was demolished a few years ago and replaced by flats or similar (source for King Lear pub). But no worries. I just though you might be interested. Cheers. Storye book (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Shenley AV. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 30#Shenley AV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Beryllate. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 16#Beryllate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

The article Scilly Isles, Surrey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable roundabout with little evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Template:Multiple place names has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Crowfield Airfield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncited, no evidence of notability for private airfield

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Category:Alumni of the University of Malta has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Curbon7 (talk) 02:48, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hoyden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find any sources, remains unsourced after 11 years. Fails

WP:NMUSIC

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

The article Adrienne Posta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources that show notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

The redirect Forced march has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 4 § Forced march until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect LACV has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 1 § LACV until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 12:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dressing down is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dressing down until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 03:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older has been inactive for some time. The following three proposals may help invigorate this project.

1. Change the name of this project to WikiProject Senior Wikipedians.^[a]
2. Open membership in this project to users who are at least 60 years of age and have made at least 50 edits in the past year.^[b]
3. Open supporting membership in this project to users who are less than 60 years old but have made at least 50 edits in the past year and support the goals of this project.^[c]

Suggested goals for this project:

1. To support collaboration and communication among members for the advancement and improvement of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement.
2. To encourage older people, retired people, and soon-to-be-retired people to participate in Wikipedia both for the advancement of the encyclopedia and for their own personal enjoyment.
3. To encourage older people to share their experience and expertise for the improvement of Wikipedia.
4. To encourage older users to use their experience and expertise to help younger and less experienced users.
5. To encourage participation in local and regional Wikimedia events.
6. To sponsor Wikipedia meetings and classes at places where older people gather.
7. To advocate for the elimination of ageism and sexism in Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement.

Please add your suggestions for this project at Senior Wikipedians. Thank you,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 01:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't wish to receive any further information about Senior Wikipedians, please remove your username from our notice list. Thanks.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Village Green, Christchurch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Village Green, Christchurch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexeyevitch^(talk) 08:55, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My proposal to make extensive changes to WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older was a bust, primarily because many users felt that the term "Senior Wikipedian" implied a higher ranking Wikipedia membership. Therefore, I am making two less ambitious proposals:

Proposal #1. Change the name of "WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older" to "WikiProject Elder Wikipedians".

Proposal #2. Drop the minimum age requirement to 60 years.

Please respond to Elder Wikipedians and let us know what you think of each of these proposals.
Thank you,  Buaidh  talk e-mail

If you don't wish to receive any further information about Elder Wikipedians, please remove your username from our notice list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 7 § Category:Buildings and structures by decade of destruction on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 17:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wolverhampton (Pendeford) airfield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of importance or notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 6 § States and territories (dis)established in YYYY on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. harrz ^talk 21:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 27 § Musical groups established in 1650s-1790s on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Somerset Coal Canal has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:08, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]