User talk:Scorpion0422/Archive 17

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Theleftorium 22:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter Issue LXVI - April 11, 2010 Issue LXV | Issue LXVII Project in Review As of March 2010: Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 2 3 7 12 FL 1 26 45 72 GA 10 109 219 338 B 11 40 132 345 4 532 C 9 49 271 1,655 100 2,084 Start 2 47 336 4,919 284 5,588 Stub 2 276 1 60 339 List 1 60 1,125 60 1,246 Category 3 2,276 2,279 Disambig 1 21 22 File 1,683 1,683 Redirect 1 11 101 641 754 Template 1 1 805 807 NA 115 115 Draft 1 11 12 Assessed 22 151 951 8,698 5,553 508 15,883 Unassessed 1 11 1 19 32 Total 22 152 951 8,709 5,554 527 15,915 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 40,582 Ω = 4.56 Changes to Featured and Good Content Promoted Featured articles : None Promoted Featured lists : None Promoted Featured topics : None Reassessed Featured content: None Promoted Good articles : Debra Marshall (review page) Nick Mitchell (review page) Promoted Good topics : None Reassessed Good content: None Other Project News —Articles Featured list candidates . Featured list status . Good article nominees . Deletion discussions : Articles for deletion : Current: Brimstone (wrestler) (2nd nomination) and Derek Allen. Deleted: Mike Senica and WrestleMania XXVIII. Requested moves Current: Several requested moves are being discussed at WP:TW#More proposed moves . Moved: Chris Mordetzky to Jack Swagger, Rafael García to Super Caló, and José Luis Jair Soria to Shocker (wrestler) . —Project As part of the project's New Year's Resolutions, there is an ongoing effort to decrease the number of stubs to 5%. As of April 11, we are at 7.62%, with 363 articles currently in Category:Stub-Class Professional wrestling articles. It still would be greatly appreciated if members would expand, source and improve stub articles, and a list of well-known wrestlers and tag teams that should be fairly easy to improve is included on the stub article subpage. Based on the members list, there are currently 243 members participating in WikiProject Professional wrestling. Events Calendar This section is intended to warn users about potential targets of promotions for the month of April . 18 - Total Nonstop Action Wrestling (TNA) presents Lockdown 25 - World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) presents Extreme Rules Recent Professional Wrestling News At WrestleMania XXVI: Batista . Jack Swagger won the Money in the Bank ladder match . The Undertaker defeated Shawn Michaels in a "Streak vs. Career" match, forcing Michaels to retire. On March 29: It was reported that Nasty Boys (Brian Knobbs and Jerry Sags ) had been released from their TNA contracts. Brooke Adams made her TNA debut on Impact! as Eric Bischoff 's assistant, Ms. Tessmacher. Jack Swagger cashed in his Money in the Bank contract at the SmackDown taping on March 30 and defeated Chris Jericho to win the World Heavyweight Championship for the first time. The match aired on the April 2 episode of SmackDown. Christopher Daniels was released from his TNA contract on March 31. Chris Kanyon died on April 2 at the age of 40 due to a drug overdose in an apparent suicide. On April 3: Lance Cade was released from his WWE contract. At ROH's The Big Bang! pay-per-view: Christopher Daniels made his return to Ring of Honor (ROH). The Kings of Wrestling (Chris Hero and Claudio Castagnoli) defeated the Briscoe Brothers (Mark and Jay) to win the ROH World Tag Team Championship for the second time. On April 5 on Impact!, TNA Women's Knockout Championship by defeating Tara, Velvet Sky, and Daffney , and opening the correct lockbox with the key she won as a result. Editing Tips This section is devoted to helping project members become familiar with the Manual of Style and general editing tips. Please remember that fair use images and media can be only be used if no free equivalent is available or could be created. Fair use images uploaded when a free equivalent exists will be deleted. If you come across an article that fails notability requirements, you can tag it for speedy deletion if the WP:AFD . Trivia sections are discouraged in wikipedia articles. Information from such sections, if notable, should be merged into the main body of the article. The lead section of an article should introduce the subject and summarize the entire article. The Biographies of living persons policy should be strictly adhered to when adding to information to biography articles. Only add controversial, possibly contentious or libellous information if it comes from a verifiable . Make sure that all information contained in biographies of living persons is written neutrally, from a non-point of view perspective. Contributors to this Issue Curtis23 (talk · contribs) NiciVampireHeart (talk · contribs) Wrestlinglover (talk · contribs) Project Navigation PW Project main pages Main project – talk Project category – talk Portal – talk Style guide – talk PW Project Departments Assessment – talk Cleanup listing – talk Pay-Per-View Expansion – talk Stub article expansion – talk

Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at

One one hand I felt I couldn't condone the approach certain editors were taking to fair use images, but on the other hand I realised I couldn't fail it over this issue. That's why I put it up for a second opinion, and the matter seems to have been resolved now. At least I managed to give it a bit of a copy-edit, so my review wasn't a complete waste of time. Good luck with further articles! Lampman (talk) 23:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, when you get the chance can you take a second look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Olympic women's ice hockey players for the United States/archive1 and check that your concerns have been resolved? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 21:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, not sure if you noticed Felipe Menegaz's comment at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2010 Winter Olympics medal table/archive1. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:28, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing; just a note that Resolute responded to you at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of NHL players with 50-goal seasons/archive1. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:28, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. So should I assume that you don't intend to add a medal map per Felipe's suggestion (just to clarify)? Dabomb87 (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: can you take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Olympic medalists in luge/archive1? You're a pro at bringing those lists up to FL standard, so if there is anything that needs to be fixed, you'd probably recognize it. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've promoted the article. Thanks for your patience. J Milburn (talk) 12:55, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left some stuff for you. Theleftorium 14:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck arguing with that guy about the images. He is apparently on an anti-non-free image campaign. He also made similar arguments at my current FAC before opposing claiming the single non-free image, the book's cover, failed NFCC and therefore the FA criteria. He's done this on half a dozen other FAs so far, and no matter how you try to reason with him, he still turns around an opposes. On the good side, it seems like he is also mostly ignored by other reviewers and by the delegates because his arguments really are badly made and seem to reflect a complete misunderstanding of the entire non-free policy. 14:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi. You recently reverted my edit to the Blood Feud (The Simpsons)‎‎ article with no explanation. If you looked at my edit, you'd see that I converted a hard to read, disjointed paragraph into a number of bullet points. I see no reason why you would object to that. -Roger (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've again reverted my edit with no explanation. Please at least acknowledge my original comment before doing so again. Thanks. -Roger (talk) 15:26, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the barnstar! You're a great help to the project too!

		The Simpsons (Annoyed Grunt)-star
		I'm awarding you this star for all your help on the classic seasons good article drive. Plus an extra thank you for taking the initiative of thanking all the other users involved with the drive. Keep up all your great work! chat 18:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

Crap, Ctjf83 beat me to it! Theleftorium 20:01, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm Moisejp and I'm part of the

Thanks so much!! You've been a big help! Moisejp (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not continue reverting at List of Nobel laureates in Literature. I've started a discussion here. [4] Regards, JohnWBarber (talk) 02:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Round two is over, and we are down to our final 32. For anyone interested in the final standings (though not arranged by group) this page has been compiled. Congratulations to

Judge iMatthew has retired from Wikipedia, and we wish him the best. The competition has been ticking over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. A special thank you goes to participants

Hello, Scorpion0422. You have new messages at Whywhenwhohow's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

According to ARIA (here), the ARIA Hall of Fame induction of AC/DC in 1988 is also an ARIA Award and is counted in their total of three wins from five nominations. Could you return the List of awards and nominations received by AC/DC back to the more accurate form.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:00, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, sometimes I miss comments that an editor made, particularly if it was only one time and they never followed up. As for Lisa, I feel like there could be more about her overall character: she's the middle child, more of her activism (she lived in a tree to prevent its destruction, that one comes to mind), she was part of MENSA.... come to think of it, a lot of that is redundant with what you have in "Personality", so that section probably doesn't need much (if any) more. I think more pressing are details on the Yeardly Smith audition (which is important to Lisa Simpson as an encyclopedia article), and the negative reception (which is how the real world looks at her). Let me know when/if you nom it again. --Hurricanehink (talk) 02:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, since I reviewed yours, I was wondering if you could review an FAC of mine - Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cyclone Gonu/archive1. Thanks if you get the chance! Hurricanehink (talk) 17:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, that audition stuff is better, how it's a little clearer. Good luck w/ the negative reception, tho. --Hurricanehink (talk) 23:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Judge Me Tender and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Judge Me Tender, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
  for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Judge Me Tender
  with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the
  GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Judge Me Tender. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
  for instructions.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Judge Me Tender saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Whywhenwhohow (talk) 21:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Scorpion, Radiowallah here. Sorry not to use the Sandbox for National Parks list. New to this. I'm going to construct the table with as many photos as I can find and reinsert it complete. If you still think it doesn't work, no doubt you will want to revert it. I think there's much to be gained with the photos as part of the table. Maybe it's premature for a Descriptions column. But see what you think. Anyway, as we're both Leafs fans, surely we can agree... Radiowallah (talk) 23:51, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Radiowallah[reply]

Thanks for fixing my error. Narssarssuaq (talk) 13:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Rock the Park, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock the Park. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Deconstructhis (talk) 23:09, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... in reverting the "sortable" option from the coaches section? What harm does it do? "As far as you know" there won't be any new coaches anytime soon. How far do you know? Have you done any research? LarRan (talk) 20:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I did do some research. I looked at the coaches of this year's final teams. Joel Quenneville and Peter Laviolette have never won Olympic gold medals. As far as I know, there aren't any Olympic Games or World Championships coming up any time soon (I could be wrong, but these things tend to be spaced out).

So considering that, I concluded that there won't be any new coach members any time soon, so there's no need to make a table of one sortable. Simple enough. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 20:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My reasons were (1) uniformity, (2) future use (you never know...). But whatever. LarRan (talk) 20:13, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure, I did mention other, more recent images, but the implication was that this was the only useable one he had. Not that I'm complaining. I'll probably mail him again in a few months to see how the star campaign is going (apparently the Canadian Walk of Fame attempt failed, so they're trying for the Hollywood walk before they attempt it again) so I’ll ask if he has others. It's a really shame nobody close to the show is reachable though (apart from Bill of course). I've contacted Hank, Yeardley and Silverman on Twitter touting for images, but none of them responded. Gran² 20:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He said Phil "came in third" and thus doesn't get on this year. I've no idea if that makes sense but you're the expert on the process. I'll probably message Josh at some point... Julie Kavner is now chief image priority. Gran² 20:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We are half way through round 3, with a little under a month to go. The current overall leader is

Two of last year's final 8,

Hi Scorpion0422. FYI, when proposing categories for deletion, you should add {{subst:cfd}} to the top of the category, not just {{cfd}}, as you did here. I have fixed that one for you. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 23:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I see you've been around a long time, so you probably already knew that and it was just an error. Sorry. DH85868993 (talk) 23:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit, as noted above the list the order isn't in order of his favorite but by air date, if he said that a particular episode was his favorite then of course that information should be added and sourced to a page but it's no reason to destroy the entire list. I copied the list order from page 70 of the book by the way in case you want to check my sourcing. I'll add the page to my watchlist and will happily discuss any changes on the talk page if you would like. Cat-five - talk 17:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I added the information about his favorite episode above the list, conveniently it was on the same page which made sourcing easy and I hope that it works for you in trying to get that information out while still maintaining the list. Cat-five - talk 17:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

http://www.broadcastermagazine.com/issues/story.aspx?aid=1000374109 65.92.22.48 (talk) 19:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)samusek2[reply]

Hi Scorp. Wow, it's been so long since I used my account I've forgotten all the code.

As you probably know I've gone in a different direction. I moved away from Wikipedia after I found other ways to express my writing skills. I probably won't return as a dedicated editor, and I most likely won't be trying for any more GAs. Glad to see you guys are still getting there. :D

Thanks for the barnstar, and good luck for the future. Tell Gran2 and those other guys I said hi/bye.

All the best, ...hmmm, what's the code for signatures... oh right, --

[5] Do you not like Mr. Groening's choice of favorite episode? ;) Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be on in a few minutes, I just need to install a Java update... Gran² 18:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the awards list with the Emmys noms, could you check to make sure I did it correctly? Also, I left off the nom for Spurlock's documentary, should we include that? Gran² 14:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I traced the guy's IP address: sure enough it is operating from 10201 Pico Boulevard. Otherwise known as the 20th Century Fox lot. So it's a Fox employee, I've got a feeling it may actually be Jean himself (or his assistant), especially when it makes edits like this [6]. But why is Jean so concerned about Ortved? Unless he can't take his deserved criticism. I mean I would understand if Brooks or Groening sued (and they probably are), so Jean must really be sticking up for his bosses... But why object to saying Meyer led the rewrite room? Crazy. Anyway, in the event that it is a Fox employee, I left a request for images, let's get some use from him. Oh, and it seems Dan Greaney doesn't mean it when he says things: [7]...

As for Emmys, at least Matthew Fox and Elizabeth Mitchell (for some reason) got nominated, both were long overdue. But Nestor should have been nominated. Anyway, I'm currently working on Oakley's page. My aim for the summer is to get all of the showrunners done. Gran² 09:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question: Do you know who the composer on The Simpsons was before Alf Clausen? Did the show even have one? Gran² 17:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Scorpion0422/Archive 17. Thank you for your recent contributions on articles related to the talk) 07:01, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were

Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the third Great Wikipedia Dramaout- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself.

If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at

--Anthonix (talk) 09:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We are half-way through our penultimate round, and nothing is yet certain. Pool A, currently led by

Planning has begun for the 2011 WikiCup, with open discussions concerning scoring and flags for next year's competition. Contributions to those discussions would be appreciated, especially concerning the flags, as next year's signups cannot begin until the flag issue has been resolved. Signups will hopefully open at some point in this round, with discussion about possible changing in the scoring/process opening some time afterwards.

Earlier this round, we said goodbye to

You really need to improve the fair-use rationale on this one. I have a feeling someone is going to oppose over it. Welcome back by the way! I hope you don't mind the changes I made to the article. Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:55, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Yeah, I'm surprised by the lack of reviews. It's not exactly a boring article. Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:38, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey scorpion how would you make a first season artical FT. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 06:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly Family Guy season 1. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 04:32, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is this episode not religious enough? Sure, when compared to the other Christian themed episodes in the series, I'd agree with you. But, as for Hindu themes, it's probably more HIndu-centric than "The Two Mr's Nahasapeemapetilons", currently included in the list. Apu comes to live with the Simpsons in order to work off his karmic debt for what he did to Homer. He decides to go on a pilgrimage to India to see the head of the Kwik-E-Mart coporation. Once they get there, the head of the corp. is a wise old yogi living on top of a mountain who doles out wisdom sparingly. These Hindu themes are much more pervasive and a larger part of the story that the Hindu tradition of arranged marriage is in the only other Hindu-centric episode in the list. I added it because it is on my list of religiously themed episodes that I'm using to teach a "Theology of the Simpsons" class at a Unitarian church and I was surprised to see that it was not on the list here on Wikipedia. This seemed like an omission to me for sure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tetsuo29 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that the article had more than 10 entries, which makes it "eligible" for

Excuse me scorpion but the picture on the Simpson main page how did you get it, the one with all the writers in it. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 17:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you come on IRC at some point if you have a chance? Cheers, Gran² 20:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging You asked "Did you ever pause to think that maybe there's a reason why the 100+ Simpsons-related templates and categories were not part of WP:DOH?" The answer is no. You want me to remove the tag from them, but I don't see the point as they are only in Category:NA-importance The Simpsons articles and Category:NA-Class The Simpsons articles and only they are in Category:NA-importance The Simpsons articles and Category:NA-Class The Simpsons articles. What would be the point of removing the tag? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose The purpose of tagging is to identify what belongs to which WikiProjects; these categories are automatically generated and populated. If the WikiProject doesn't want to do anything with them, they don't have to do anything with them; just leave them sitting there and they won't hurt anything. Later on, if they need to be identified, they have a tag. I'm still not seeing the harm or the problem that needs to be solved here. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article space Looking over the project and its talk page, the only indication that I see that the WikiProject exclusively focuses on the main article namespace is here and that's hardly a strong consensus to exclude the other namespaces in addition to the fact that this tag in no way harms anything and is potentially useful. I don't really care for the implication that I'm lazy, though and I think you're being uncivil. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit count Okay, I didn't do it to up my edit count; I did it to be helpful. Why are you being so rude to me? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:59, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to butt in here, but koavf is on my watchlist and I was curious! My questions are simple, "If the Simpsons-related articles should not be tagged as Simpsons project, what should they be tagged? Or should they be left to disappear into the ether because nobody actually cares? In which case why doesn't the project just ask for them to be deleted? Feel free to ignore or reply here. Cheers. Richhoncho (talk) 10:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We have our final eight! The best of luck to those who remain. A bumper newsletter this week as we start our home straight.

• Pool A's winner was Sturmvogel_66 (submissions). Awarded the top score overall this round, Sturmvogel_66 writes primarily on military history, favouring Naval warfare.
• Pool B's winner was Casliber (submissions). Awarded the top score for featured articles this round, Casliber writes primarily on natural sciences, especially botany and ornithology.
• Pool A's close second was Sasata (submissions). Awarded the top score for featured pictures this round, Sasata writes primarily on natural sciences, favouring mycology.
• Pool B's close second was ThinkBlue (submissions). Awarded the top score for good articles and topics this round, ThinkBlue primarily writes content related to television and film, including 30 Rock.
• The first wildcard was TonyTheTiger (submissions). Awarded the top score for did you knows and valued pictures this round, TonyTheTiger writes on a number of topics, including baseball, American football and Chicago.
• The second wildcard was White Shadows (submissions). Someone who has helped the Cup behind the scenes all year, White Shadows said "I'm still in shock that I made it this far" and writes primarily on Naval warfare, especially U-boats.
• The third wildcard was Staxringold (submissions). Awarded the top score for featured lists and topics this round, Staxringold primarily writes on sport and television, including baseball and 30 Rock.
• The fourth wildcard was William S. Saturn (submissions). Entering the final eight only on the final day of the round, William S. Saturn writes on a number of topics, mostly related to Texas.

We say goodbye to the six who fell at the final hurdle.

Gary King (submissions) contributed a variety of did you know articles. Suomi Finland 2009 (submissions) said "I'm surprised to have survived so far into the competition", but was extactic to see Finland in the semi-finals. Arsenikk (submissions) did not score this round, but has scored highly in previous rounds. We also say goodbye to Ian Rose (submissions), who withdrew earlier this month after spending six weeks overseas. Anyone interested in this round's results can see them here and here. Thank you to Stone (submissions

Scorpioin do you know any good copy editor who can do a good job and is abailaval. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 22:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have given the article a quick spruce-up and plan to take it to FLC to try and preserve the NHL Awards Featured Topic. As you are still the editor with the most edits to the article, could you confirm that you are OK with this? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. Hope you're doing well, Dabomb87 (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You promoted this featured list, so I thought you might be able to help me with a request. If my request cannot be accommodated, of if it needs to be directed elsewhere, I understand. List of awards and nominations received by Rufus Wainwright was promoted under my previous username (Whataworld06). I would love for the list to be credited to my current (and permanent) username, Another Believer. Is there any way this could be accommodated? I figured updating all occurrences of my former username might also help with bot functions like the one that updates this list. Perhaps this page could be updated or a log containing FL promotions could be updated to credit the list to my current username? --Another Believer _(Talk) 20:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. This issue has been resolved. --Another Believer _(Talk) 23:33, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We are half-way through our final round, entering the home straight.

Despite controversy, the WikiCup remains open.

In case you are interested, I just created List of 1992 Summer Olympics medal winners. I saw that you have worked very successfully on Olympics-related lists in the past, so I thought I would give you a heads up! Keep up the great work! --Another Believer _(Talk) 23:33, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message as you previously posted in the ongoing RfC on whether Featured List Criteria section 3b should be modified or eliminated. Based on feedback and commentary received during the section-by-section analysis of the current criteria, I have proposed a new version of the criteria here. I would like your input on ways to improve and refine this proposal, in hopes of reaching consensus to implement this change to the criteria. Thank you for your attention. –Grondemar 17:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Scorpion0422 please join the discussion at Template talk:Treehouse of Horror , your input is appreciated.

I'm sorry that we're butting heads like this, but we both seem to think that the other is misunderstanding the purpose of a template. I was recruited IRL to fix the template in the manner I am attempting to. I am now going to recruit some editors who have previous edited the ThoH template, so they can chime in. Please, do us all a favor and stop undo-ing the relevant, useful and valid edits that are increasing to the usability of the template. There is simple, overly-simplistic, and stubbornly overly-simplistic ... guess which one you're being. Fixblor (talk) 08:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes

Please weigh in on Talk:List of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes#Inclusion of episode segment links, so we can generate a consensus. Thanks, Fixblor (talk) 09:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert List of Stanley Cup champions ? This link was dead.

A file that you uploaded or altered,

The 2010 WikiCup is over! It has been a long journey, but what has been achieved is impressive: combined, participants have produced over seventy featured articles, over five hundred good articles, over fifty featured lists, over one thousand one hundred "did you know" entries, in addition to various other pieces of recognised content. A full list (which has yet to be updated to reflect the scores in the final round) can be found here. Perhaps more importantly, we have our winner! The 2010 WikiCup champion is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), with an unbelievable 4220 points in the final round. Second place goes to TonyTheTiger (submissions), with 2260, and third to Casliber (submissions), with 560. Congratulations to our other four finalists – White Shadows (submissions), William S. Saturn (submissions), Staxringold (submissions) and ThinkBlue (submissions). Also, congratulations to Sasata (submissions), who withdrew from the competition with an impressive 2685 points earlier in this round.

Prizes will also be going to those who claimed the most points for different types of content in a single round. It was decided that the prizes would be awarded for those with the highest in a round, rather than overall, so that the finalists did not have an unfair advantage. Winning the featured article prize is Casliber (submissions), for five featured articles in round 4. Winning the good article prize is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), for eighty-one good articles in round 5. Winning the featured list prize is Staxringold (submissions), for six featured lists in round 1. Winning the picture and sound award is Jujutacular (submissions), for four featured pictures in round 3. Winning the topic award is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), for forty-seven articles in various good topics in round 5. Winning the "did you know" award is TonyTheTiger (submissions), for over one hundred did you knows is round 5. Finally, winning the in the news award is Candlewicke (submissions), for nineteen articles in the news in round three.

The WikiCup has faced criticism in the last month – hopefully, we will take something positive from it and create a better contest for next year. Like Wikipedia itself, the Cup is a work in progress, and ideas for how it should work are more than welcome on the

]

WikiCup 2010 Ribbon of Participation

		The WikiCup 2010 Ribbon of Participation
		Awarded to Scorpion0422, for participation in the 2010 WikiCup. Fox and The ed17 08:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

Survivor Piombo

It's from a blog http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/inmarin/detail?entry_id=72707

-Frenzy- (talk) 23:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recently I noticed on a

]

One possibility is Products produced from The Simpsons, but it doesn't include Mapple and I'm kind of reluctant to be the one to add it. I'm no expert. If Mapple was there, surely its logo would be worth mentioning as well.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut

Thanks for the heads up. I likely won't get involved in the GAR though. It's clearly not ready for GA status, and I'm sure the reassessment process will affirm that. Seems like the user means well though. — Hunter Kahn 00:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Laurier Golden Hawks - 2005 Vanier Cup champions.jpg

Thanks for uploading

this list, click on this link

, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FLRC

I have nominated

featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Longevity COI

A discussion about longevity

WP:COI has been initiated at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People#End COI. As a recent contributor to this page, your comments are solicited. JJB

20:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

BS

		The Original Barnstar
		Too often great editors like you are overlooked and not given the credit deserved for all their great contributions. So I am awarding you this barnstar to let you know I greatly appreciate all you do for Wikipedia, and please keep up the outstanding work!! chat 03:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

The Simpsons characters

I have created because the characters were on the list of recurring characters, and as I had a very large size, I've created to put the characters there.HeinzDoofenshmirtz —Preceding undated comment added 21:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

With everything I've worked to change the characters in place and giving space on the page of

recurring characters from The Simpsons, I feel bad that I erased it all. I just try to improve the pages._{HeinzDoofenshmirtz} —Preceding undated comment added 21:23, 21 November 2010 (UTC).[reply

]

Why did you delete everything I do? Tell me what I'm doing wrong, because I do not see to do something so as to delete--HeinzDoofenshmirtz (talk) 07:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But anyway I have a Jack Larson and Princess Kashmir in the page of media personalities, as I believe they are characters in that category--HeinzDoofenshmirtz (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

It's a shame they had to move, but that skin is so much nicer. Anyway, yeah, I've kinda been out of this ever since I got to uni, because there's literally no time to edit anything... Oh well. But yeah, (if you have time) can I send you the transcript of Bill's interview to clean up and upload? Because I'm never going to get around to doing it. Gran² 21:53, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3rr on The Itchy & Scratchy Show

Ok, so I just suppressed that edit you made while logged out, but per

WP:3RR, you're done on that article for the moment. Final warn an' all that ... - Alison ^❤ 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Grey Cup Champions

The information table about number of cups hosted per city is relevant and not redundant. The information is included in the table with numbers, but the list of Grey Cups is over 100 rows long. This table is a quick reference and show clearly the distribution of cup games. The scoring records are again derived from the table and are useful because they serve as a quick reference. The Win/Loss tables contain information that is contained in the table too and you don't delete that table. If you don't think the information tables are pertinent to this specific page then create a new one rather than just deleting them. The page may be called List of Grey Cup Champions, but the list itself is a list of dates, champions, losers, scores, stadiums, cities.Donutcity (talk) 10:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Canada at the 2012 Summer Olympics

I do not think a redirect is necessary here, we have one compeitor by name qualified, and qualfication picks up in 2011, so the article should be left as it is. Intoronto1125 (talk) 16:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And that's why we should wait for FoxFlash?

I know that was directed at me, so I'll just say, the ONLY reason I did anything at all with List of The Simpsons episodes this morning is to revert THIS EDIT, the same edit with a different number which we truly have no confirmation for, and prevent it from happening again. At least I had a source for mine, and if left in, it would have ended the matter once and for all. Without it, well, how long have you been editing this page? I've been here long enough to know that some IP is always going to fill in empty spaces and question marks. I didn't cause the problem; I offered a solution to it. The only thing that may have been changed by my contribution is the number they're filling in. KnownAlias contact 23:46, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your

GA nomination of Treehouse of Horror IX

The article Treehouse of Horror IX you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Treehouse of Horror IX for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Admrboltz (talk) 03:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Donnie Fatso

In the future please do not delete the Cultural references for this article, If you look almost 95 percent of The Simpsons episode articles include Cultural references, if you feel that it should not be included then please go to the talk page and discuss it first. If you continue to delete without giving a good and valid reason you could end up being banned from editing which is something I don't really like to see happen to Wikipedians. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. 3littlemaidsfromschool (talk) 01:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I must agree with 3littlemaidsfromschool. Please explain any removal of content in your edit summary. Thanks. Guoguo12--Talk--  01:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New messages

Hello, Scorpion0422. You have new messages at Guoguo12's talk page.
Message added 19:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Guoguo12--Talk--  19:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied at the above link. Guoguo12--Talk--  22:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion at List of Nobel Peace Prize laureates

I've started a discussion about your recent deletion of information about Peace Prize recipients who were assassinated or died in custody here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Nobel_Peace_Prize_laureates#Peace_Prize_recipients_who_were_assassinated_or_who_died_in_custody Ghostofnemo (talk) 01:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photos at

Lou Marsh Trophy

Hello. I'm not trying to be difficult - it does seem odd, however, not to have a photo of the current winner of the trophy in the article on the basis that the article is "full". It's not readily apparent that the photos in the latter section are only of those who have won the award numerous times, but I'll defer to you on that. In fact, I defer to your judgment as to where you think Votto's photo best goes - you might prefer to keep Gretzky at the top, and that might be best - I am sure Votto can be accommodate elsewhere in the article. I'll leave it in your hands.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:11, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then place it where you think it should go, rather than deleting it and saying the article is full. It's not surprising you face this issue all the time. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And please try and restrain from using snarky comments like the "Votto fan club" in your edit comments. I didn't even know who Votto was until a few days ago. You don't have a monopoly on the desire to see the best article possible. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Survivor (U.S. TV series) contestants

Just an FYI, there's an IP who wishes to break out the people who medically left or quit. You might want to join in on the discussion since that would be a major change to the format of list. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FTCR

Hello Scorpion. I have placed

GamerPro64 (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]