User talk:Staxringold/Archive15

Added two further suggestions. Brad78 (talk) 21:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks smashing. However, I'll keep it on hold in case you can find any source for the 2001 SFG-LAD game. If you can get verification from somewhere that that was indeed the game that broke the 1962 tiebreaker length, I'd be tempted not to mention the NYY-Red Sox match at all, otherwise you'll have to revisit this page every time the record is broken, when in fact the most important subsequent game in this regards is the one that superceeds its length. Brad78 (talk) 00:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just found this game too:

"The previous American League record was 4:22, which the Yankees and Orioles set on Sept. 5, 1997." [1] Don't know if that helps find a source to say when the 1962 tiebreaker record was beaten. Brad78 (talk) 00:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good find and great work. Passed it. Brad78 (talk) 01:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Been editing without an account for ages. Decided I wanted to actually focus on trying to write GA content so guessed an account was better way to do so. Brad78 (talk) 01:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of largest single day Jeopardy! winnings, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest single day Jeopardy! winnings until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sottolacqua (

Yeah, when I did a read through of the summaries, I tweaked them a bit so that they no be copy-vio, but just to be on the safe side I'll ask for a copy-edit, better that way, right? You deserve credit, I mean you did add some useful info. into the season page, so, besides

it might be best not to do it alone. ;) And by that I mean nominate it alone, kinda scary. Yeah, I want to get this over with so I can start work on season five. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Yeah, I guess we should delete the current ones, and rewrite them. Well, I'm glad that info. is available for the new season, cause I just started work for the season premiere, the second episode, and the live episode, so I guess we're set with the first few episodes, and you don't have to break a sweat. ;) Maybe we can get those DYK?'s right this time, you know. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, alright, I got it, don't need to yell at me. :) Yes, I went hardcore, I'm trying to be ready so that we don't have the same problem we're having with season four, so. I'm ready, I'm gonna do what I did with "Emanuelle Goes to Dinosaur Land" and "I Do Do", meaning create it the day after the broadcast, which I believe I did with the two, or the same day but after it has aired, cause I want a DYK? out of it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:31, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, is that DYK? I submit for "The Fabian Strategy" a good one? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh, that's a good hook. If they have a problem with it I'll change it to that, and you can get credit as you suggested it. So, what do you think of the plot from the episode? I'm only asking if you saw the premiere, if not then don't answer this. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 05:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm gonna fix the run-on sentences, I promise you that. :) Hey, do you think I should add in Liz and Carol's plot what Liz tells him at the end, you know see you October 14 which so happens to be the live episode or do I not add it at all? I need a second opinion about this. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should be able to finish it up within the next two weeks. Been so busy with offwiki matters that I've barely had time to handle FTC; heck I've reviewed maybe one GA this month, lol. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So I'm finally getting off my lazy butt and finishing this one. Better late than never I guess. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:16, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's me again

Hey Stax. I'm (finally) finished with the data entry for the Phillies roster. I have one lead done, and I'd like your opinion before I get in too deep. If there's anything I can do for you, let me know. Thanks! — KV5 • Talk • 16:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Staxringold. You have new messages at Killervogel5's talk page.
Message added 01:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Guess what? — KV5 • Talk • 15:02, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Gift of the Woodi

Hi Staxringgold, I noticed you first created the

What Is… Cliff Clavin? article. I'm assuming you are a Cheers fan). I am hoping that you will be sympathetic to my cause. I created the The Gift of the Woodi article years ago to cover the Cheers episode in which Woody sings the K-E-L-L-Y song. People who apparently know nothing about Cheers are threatening to delete this article. Please take a look at the article and judge for yourself.Clerks. (talk) 19:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for your feedback. I appreciate your participation in the discussion. I disagree with your opinion, as I believe Wikipedia is better for having this article.Clerks. (talk) 19:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2010 September newsletter

We are half-way through our final round, entering the home straight.

WikiCup talk page

.

Despite controversy, the WikiCup remains open.

Fox and The ed17 23:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh goody

Looks like there's probably going to be a tie-breaker article to write after tomorrow's games are done. Both SanFran and Atlanta have to win to prevent one. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 22:56, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

• News and notes: German chapter remodeled to meet Foundation requirements, and more

• In the news: Spanish police pursues BLP vandals, Jimbo interviewed, advice for experts and spammers

• Book review: Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, by Joseph Reagle

• WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes

• Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture

• Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

• Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

RfC on Featured List Criteria section 3b

Hello. You are receiving this message as you previously posted in the ongoing RfC on whether Featured List Criteria section 3b should be modified or eliminated. Based on feedback and commentary received during the section-by-section analysis of the current criteria, I have proposed a new version of the criteria here. I would like your input on ways to improve and refine this proposal, in hopes of reaching consensus to implement this change to the criteria. Thank you for your attention. –Grondemar 17:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

• News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more

• In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution

• Features and admins: Big week for ships and music

• Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd

• Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 07:56, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

30 Rock Season 4

Sorry to bother you with this... again, but since there's a deadline for the 30 Rock seasons page, October 18 I believe, I was wondering if you can look over the plot summaries, which I worked on with what you suggested that I do and stuff, and tell me what you think, and if everything is set for a nomination at FLC. I would appreciate this A LOT. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/30 Rock (season 4)/archive1. Courcelles 23:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

• News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief

• WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics

• Features and admins: A week for marine creatures

• Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review

• Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months

• Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Fair use rationale for File:HappybdMMmp3.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale

.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)	Editorial In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section talk) 20:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

• News and notes: Mike Godwin leaves the Foundation, ArbCom election announced

• In the news: Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news

• WikiProject report: Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• ArbCom interview: So what is being an arbitrator actually like?

• Arbitration report: Case closes within 1 month

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The WikiCup 2010 Award for Featured Lists

File:WikiCup Medal Gold FX.png		The WikiCup 2010 Award for Featured Lists
		Awarded to Staxringold, for outstanding content contributions during the 2010 WikiCup. Fox and The ed17 J Milburn (talk) 00:07, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

WikiCup 2010 Final 8

		WikiCup 2010 Final 8
		Awarded to Staxringold, for reaching the final 8 in the 2010 WikiCup. Fox and The ed17 00:20, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

WikiCup 2010 October newsletter

The 2010 WikiCup is over! It has been a long journey, but what has been achieved is impressive: combined, participants have produced over seventy featured articles, over five hundred good articles, over fifty featured lists, over one thousand one hundred "did you know" entries, in addition to various other pieces of recognised content. A full list (which has yet to be updated to reflect the scores in the final round) can be found here. Perhaps more importantly, we have our winner! The 2010 WikiCup champion is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), with an unbelievable 4220 points in the final round. Second place goes to TonyTheTiger (submissions), with 2260, and third to Casliber (submissions), with 560. Congratulations to our other four finalists – White Shadows (submissions), William S. Saturn (submissions), Staxringold (submissions) and ThinkBlue (submissions). Also, congratulations to Sasata (submissions), who withdrew from the competition with an impressive 2685 points earlier in this round.

Prizes will also be going to those who claimed the most points for different types of content in a single round. It was decided that the prizes would be awarded for those with the highest in a round, rather than overall, so that the finalists did not have an unfair advantage. Winning the featured article prize is Casliber (submissions), for five featured articles in round 4. Winning the good article prize is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), for eighty-one good articles in round 5. Winning the featured list prize is Staxringold (submissions), for six featured lists in round 1. Winning the picture and sound award is Jujutacular (submissions), for four featured pictures in round 3. Winning the topic award is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), for forty-seven articles in various good topics in round 5. Winning the "did you know" award is TonyTheTiger (submissions), for over one hundred did you knows is round 5. Finally, winning the in the news award is Candlewicke (submissions), for nineteen articles in the news in round three.

The WikiCup has faced criticism in the last month – hopefully, we will take something positive from it and create a better contest for next year. Like Wikipedia itself, the Cup is a work in progress, and ideas for how it should work are more than welcome on the

Fox and The ed17 03:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiCup 2010 Ribbon of Participation

		The WikiCup 2010 Ribbon of Participation
		Awarded to Staxringold, for participation in the 2010 WikiCup. Fox and The ed17 08:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

POTD notification

Hi James,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture

chat} 23:07, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

• News and notes: Foundation's finances, geodata milestone, interim counsel, museum conference

• In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric

• WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey

• Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails

• Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days

• Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

FLC and ACCESS

As a regular at FLC, I'd like to draw your attention to ongoing discussion here about changes to the format of tables which will affect all existing FLs and all current and future FLCs. Your input would be welcome. Thanks for your contributions so far! The Rambling Man (talk) 20:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

• Fundraiser: November 15 launch, emphasis on banner optimization and community involvement

• News and notes: Second Wikipedian in Residence, {{citation needed}} for sanity

• In the news: WP prose praised, Public Policy update, education debate, WP documentary

• WikiProject report: WikiProject California

• Features and admins: No, not science fiction—real science

• Election report: The countdown begins

• Arbitration report: No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

30 Rock Season 4 and 5

In what way were my corrections to the 30 Rock viewing figures vandalism to the previous editor? If an episode was watched by 4.996 million it rounds up to 5.0, does it not? Similarly, 5.66 rounds up to 5.7 - that is correct. I'm getting a little tired of making any edit whatsoever to Wikipedia and some militant member comes and gets rid of it. You submit your work and anyone can change it - why do some users have such a problem with their work being changed?

talk) 00:00, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

No worries, apology accepted. It seems like there's quite a few ratings mistakes in the 30 Rock episode list. A number of them seem to need rounding up correctly. Maybe I'll get around to it, unless somebody else spots it.

talk) 00:30, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

• News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership

• In the news: How big can Wikipedia pictures get?; fundraising season

• WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon

• Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains

• Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process

• Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:29, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Re:

List of Major League Baseball players with a career .330 batting average

Thanks for the message, Staxringold. I've just re-worded the "considered rare" part in the article and added a source. As for .330, that just seemed like a good cutoff, in my personal opinion. There are much fewer players over .340, and a lot between .320 and .330. - PM800 (talk) 14:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Although of course, there was no source for .325 either. I also just found this 1959 Baseball Digest article. It's an interesting read, if nothing else. - PM800 (talk) 15:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 23:01, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

• News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations

• In the news: Jimbo Wales interviewed and parodied; Wikipedia in politics

• Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder

• WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Election report: Candidates still stepping forward

• Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

• News and notes: Backlog drive; youth and confidence among Wikipedians, brief news

• In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report

• Interview: Interview with Johanna Niesyto and Nathaniel Tkacz from "Critical Point of View"

• WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Election report: Voting in full swing

• Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:10, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

• News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive

• In the news: Amazon "shopping-enabling" Wikipedia; Al Jazeera interview; be like Wikipedia

• GLAM-WIKI London: British Museum hosts two days of talks between Wikimedia and the cultural sector

• WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak

• WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup

• Features and admins: Birds and insects

• Arbitration report: New case: World War II

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 23:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

30 Rock (season 4)

at FLC

Hey Stax. This list is close, but the reasonable objection over grammar in episode summaries is outstanding. Anything you could do to push it along? The Rambling Man (talk) 17:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

• News and notes: Wikipedia articles expert-reviewed by Encyclopedia of Life, and more

• In the news: Confusion about Wikileaks continues, Wikipedia vs. Britannica in India, and more

• Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Election report: The community has spoken

• Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Pete Rose

Hi there,

I know it may seem silly, but I keep editing the caption of Pete Rose on the "3000 hit club" page because mentioning his 4256 hits in the caption is irrelevant because the page isn't about his 4256 hits. Mentioning his 3000th hit is, IMO, very relevant. I'm just trying to provide the best information, as are you, and I just wanted to explain my actions.

Best wishes, -Jason 66.213.24.10 (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi James,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture

chat} 22:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

• News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief

• In the news: Faulty story urges for advertising on Wikipedia; brief news

• Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland

• Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?

• WikiProject report: Majestic Titans

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

• Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting

• News and notes: Director of Technical Operations hired; South Korean mayor sues; brief news

• In the news: Designing Wikipedia and the origin of page histories; brief news

• WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Wesley Clark

Hi ! I've translated this article for the french wp and I try to make it a featured one. So I have several questions about your version (I say "your" because you seem to be the main contributor), could you answer to it, please ?

• About topic concerning Bosnia you say that Clark followed Holbrooke on a mountain road before being attacked during the first week. Is that possible to know the exact date of this "first week" ?
• I'm not sure to have well translated this section. Are that the Bosnian fighters who led the wounded man to the hospital ? Why did they do that ?
• The article says "The bombing was noted for its high degree of accuracy, with estimated 495 civilian deaths and 820 wounded reported to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia as a result of the entire campaign" in the Kosovo war section. Why talking about "accuracy" while the ICTY said so many civilians were killed ? You mean that all the targets have been destroyed successfully ?

I'm sorry for language mistakes, if any :). Could you answer me on my french page please ? Thank you ! Petit Djul (talk) 15:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I haven't touched the article or source material in a long time, so I don't know. Though I will say 495 civilian deaths is not "so many" at all, that's an exceedingly low total for a large scale bombing campaign. Staxringold _talk^contribs

Welcome to the 2011

WikiCup

!

Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found

WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 13:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

• 2010 in review: Review of the year

• News and notes: Record fundraiser celebrated and debated; Board-appointed Trustees; brief news

• In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news

• WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux

• Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year

• Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Albert Farrington

Hi Staxringold, do we know the lifetime dates of Albert Farrington of this? Regards Hekerui (talk) 11:07, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree that it's mostly taken care of, but if one wanted to make as a good a case as can be, what would be the rationale for the UK in that case regarding Farrington, considering that he's a known contributor? Hekerui (talk) 14:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Staxringold/Archive15! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--

talk) 03:45, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

POTD notification

Hi James,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture

chat} 18:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

• News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news

• In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project

• WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways

• Features and admins: Featured topic of the year

• Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

'59 tiebreaker

Hey. Just checking to see how that's coming along. I'll try to start working on one of the three remaining articles to get that topic wrapped up, though with all the other stuff i do here now who knows. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 20:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

• News and notes: Anniversary celebrations; Foundation reports; local language problems; brief news

• In the news: Anniversary coverage continues; Thai government translates Wikipedia; brief news

• Sister projects: Upcoming steward elections, and a retrospective on stewards' work in 2010

• WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket

• Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons

• Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case

• Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the talk) 21:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

POTD notification

Hi James,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture

chat} 17:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

• News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news

• In the news: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited; Wikipedia still failing to fail; brief news

• WikiXDC: Wikipedians celebrate anniversary with US National Archives in Washington, D.C.

• WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more

• Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Talkback (KV5)

Hello, Staxringold. You have new messages at Killervogel5's talk page.
Message added 12:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Online Ambassadors

I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 23:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Romania ties

Template:Romania ties has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help?

Hello I saw you work with baseball articles and maybe you would be interested in helping

Chula Vista which im trying to expand coverage of for their centennial this year. Its ok if you dont want too help. Spongie555 (talk) 04:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

MIP

FYI: the Miss Intercontinental page that you deleted before was renamed into another title Miss Intercontinental Pageant with basically the same content. --Ped Admi (talk) 00:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed new WikiProject University of Connecticut

I remember you mentioning to me at one point that you were a Connecticut Huskies fan, so I thought I'd ping you with this:

You are cordially invited to join the newly-proposed WikiProject University of Connecticut, designed to promote collaboration and improvement on UConn-related articles on Wikipedia. Specifically, the following articles are proposed to be within the new WikiProject's scope: The University itself, including the campuses, notable buildings, notable academic programs, and notable professors; The football teams, their coaches, players, facilities, and history; Notable alumni, including both athletes and non-athletes. Currently no one WikiProject covers all UConn-related content: WikiProject Universities covers only the academic-side of the university; WikiProject College basketball and WikiProject College football cover only articles from their respective sports; WikiProject Connecticut does not cover articles related to UConn that are about places or people outside Connecticut (for example: bowl games such as the 2010 PapaJohns.com Bowl and alumni such as Svetlana Abrosimova). WikiProject University of Connecticut, when created, will be a centralized location to coordinate monitoring and improvement of UConn-related articles. To comment on the proposed creation of the new WikiProject University of Connecticut, click transcluded directly on the proposal page. Thank you for your attention, and GO HUSKIES! –Grondemar

–Grondemar 02:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Alicia Fox

I did! I'm just trying to clear some of the backlog on my watchlist. :( Gone four days and it seems I have a mountain of revisions to check. I should get to it soon. Thanks for the review by the way! NiciVampireHeart 02:18, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2011 January newsletter

We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to The Bushranger (submissions), who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by Hurricanehink (submissions), with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to Yellow Evan (submissions), who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for Talk:Hurricane King/GA1, Miyagawa (submissions), who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for Dognapping, and Jarry1250 (submissions) who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (explanation), claiming for Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!

A running total of claims can be seen

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

• News and notes: Executive Director travels; DMCA takedowns; fellowship clarifications; brief news

• In the news: Facebook hack; gender gap; What is the Wikipedia "community"?; brief news

• The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books

• WikiProject report: WikiWarriors

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

2009 WS

I'd say maybe go to PR first just to make sure everything's covered/any deadlinks are caught, then we can try fac. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC) I'll read through the article and comment at FAC thursday night. Would do it earlier but have some featured topics to promote and the GAN drive to finalize so there's no issues come march 1. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1959 National League tie-breaker series

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 1959 tie-breaker

You are welcome. Happy to help. Chris (talk) 00:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi James,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture

chat} 21:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for List of Pittsburgh Pirates first-round draft picks

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

• News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief

• In the news: Wikipedia controversies about Mormon topics examined; brief news

• Gender gap: Widespread discussions about the low participation of women in Wikipedia

• WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:09, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

• News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news

• In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news

• Accreditation: Gaining accreditation as Wikimedia photographers at sports events

• WikiProject report: Articles for Creation

• Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought

• Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

1959 National League tie-breaker series

Hi Stax. Just a quick note to let you know about the GA review here. I found the game summaries to be particularly good reads, so I'll look again tomorrow to ensure that I have scrutinized them objectively, and I always leave the lead until the very end. On the whole it's an excellent article, and I look forward to promoting it soon. Regards, —WFC— 08:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some re-wording of the "aftermath" section to emphasize further the falling fortunes of the Braves which contrasts with the rising (or continuing) fortunes of the Dodgers. It's possible you'll want better wording. And if you want specifics for their positions in each year, Retrosheet could be a good source,[4] or the MLB site for that matter. I think the closest they came again to first place was 7 games behind, in 1960, and they finished double-digits behind pretty much every year after that. Basically, they were competitive but not strong enough to win the pennant. There was also a resultant decline in attendance which helped fuel the drive to Atlanta. I was expecting to see a list of Braves year-by-year records somewhere, but I didn't find one. Maybe I looked in the wrong places. Anyway, 1959 was a watershed year. It established and legitimized the Dodgers in L.A., and while they didn't know it at the time, the fun was over in Milwaukee after several giddy years. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 13:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice I made more of a thing of it immediately above than in the article. But if you think it's still editorializing too much, feel free to fix it. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 13:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

L.A. Coliseum

The official baseball guides had "92,500" as the baseball seating capacity for the Coliseum, which was probably a round number. Capacity could be more like 100,000 for football and other events. However, "over 90,000" is certainly a safe figure. The three World Series crowds ranged between 92,300 and 92,700. The largest-ever regular season crowd was about 78,000, as the seats in the east end of the stadium were too far away, but they were opened up during the World Series, resulting in those huge crowds. The folks in the lower rows of the east-end seating probably got a good view of the right field fence and not much else. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:14, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm worthless at doing the proper citations, so I'll give it to you: Official Baseball Guide 1960, compiled by J.G. Taylor Spink in collaboration with Paul A. Rickart and Clifford Kachline, published by Charles C. Spink & Son, St. Louis, Missouri (The Sporting News Publishing Company). Page 51, Los Angeles Dodgers info: "Park Location: Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, Figueroa and Exposition Streets. Seating Capacity: 92,500". 1958 and 1959 editions say 94,600. 1961 edition says 92,500, same as 1960. That covers the 4 years the Dodgers were there. Largest crowd ever was 93,103, "Roy Campanella Night" on May 7, 1959. Hard telling where 2,100 seats went between the beginning of 1959 and the beginning of 1960, if they even existed. "Over 90,000" is still a safe bet. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 05:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Herbie Hewett/archive1

Thanks for your comments at this review, I have responded to each of your points, and hoped you could revisit? Harrias ^talk 12:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good point with regards to the cap: it's linked now. Nice to get input from outside the cricketing world, it's so easy just to slip jargon in without even realising it! Harrias ^talk 14:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 16:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

• News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news

• In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news

• Versailles: Six-month residence in the Palace of Versailles for a Wikimedian

• WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

POTD

Hi James,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture

chat} 23:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

MLB

If anything happens over WikiProject way that deserves my attention, let me know. Otherwise, I've un-watchlisted it. I have too much important work to do writing content to worry about politics.

Starting to get disenfranchised again... — KV5 • Talk • 01:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I regret to inform you that one of your featured sounds uploads was delisted. However another of your uploads, the original, unedited version of the same song, was promoted in it's place. Details are at

Wha? 22:14, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

POTD notification

Hi James,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture

chat} 19:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiCup 2011 February newsletter

So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to The Bushranger (submissions) (first, with 487 points) and Hurricanehink (submissions) (second, with 459), who stormed the first round. Casliber (submissions) finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to Jarry1250 (submissions) for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to Stone (submissions) for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.

Some news for those who are interested- March will see

a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive

, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.

Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Staxringold/Archive15&oldid=1144598708"