Angustidontus
Angustidontus | |
---|---|
Life restoration of A. seriatus | |
Appendage of A. seriatus | |
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Subphylum: | Crustacea |
Class: | |
Order: | †
Angustidontida |
Family: | |
Genus: | †Angustidontus Cooper, 1936
|
Type species | |
†Angustidontus seriatus Cooper, 1936
| |
Synonyms | |
|
Angustidontus is a genus of predatory pelagic crustaceans from the Late Devonian and Early Carboniferous periods, classified as part of the subclass Eumalacostraca. Fossils of the genus have been recovered in relative abundance from Canada, Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland, Belarus, Ukraine and large parts of the United States, including Oklahoma, Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, Montana, Utah, Nevada.
The major eumalacostracan lineages had already diverged from each other during the Devonian, but their early
Description
Angustidontus was a predatory
Angustidontus had large grasping appendages, modified from the first or second
History of research
The genus Angustidontus was named by American geologist Chalmer Lewis Cooper in 1936, together with the family "Angustidontidae". Cooper described the fossils, consisting of the serrated appendages, as fossil jaws of actinopterygian fish.[3] Since then, the appendages of Angustidontus have been the subject of much debate on its classification. In the 1950s, it was suggested that the fossils instead represented eurypterid chelicerae, possibly of something closely related to Pterygotus.[4]
In 1960, Canadian geologists Murray John Copeland and Thomas Edward Bolton considered the fossils to instead represent
Angustidontus often occurs together with Concavicaris, another Devonian crustacean. Concavicaris fossils tend to lack the appendages, whilst Angustidontus fossils often lack the cephalothoracic shield because of its weak sclerotisation. This caused some confusion, and some researchers have suggested that the two would represent different parts of the same animal.[7] Expeditions to fossil localities in Nevada where Concavicaris and Angustidontus were reported to have occurred together by Cooper in 1936 yielded more information on the appendages of Concavicaris and allowed it to be determined that the appendages of Angustidontus did not represent appendages of Concavicaris. With hundreds of specimens being collected, proper research could be conducted on Angustidontus for the first time with the discovery of the first complete specimens.[1]
The new specimens allowed researchers to determine that Angustidontus was a peracarid malacostracan crustacean, and that Concavicaris simply represented a separate animal that was part of a larger Late Devonian fauna including a large amount of different invertebrates, such as worms, cephalopods, bivalves, brachipods and sponges. The appendages which had caused confusion in the past were revealed to be the first thoracopods, but greatly elongated and adapted to be used in feeding.[1]
Classification
Angustidontus is classified as part of the extinct family Angustidontidae together with the freshwater
Some additional species of Angustidontus other than the type species A. seriatus were previously named. These were A. gracilis (Cooper, 1936), A. moravicus (Chlupáč , 1978) and A. weihmannae (Copeland & Bolton, 1960), which were separated from each other by the pattern of the teeth on their maxillipeds. They were all considered synonymous with A. seriatus by British and Polish paleontologists William David Ian Rolfe and Jerzy Dzik in 2006 as fossils of these species presented highly variable patterns. Rolfe and Dzik determined that tooth pattern was not a valid criterion for distinguishing species, with only the type species A. seriatus remaining as valid. Still, based on the morphology of different fossil mandibles, fossil material from the Early Famennian of Poland may represent two possible additional species.[1]
The cladogram below is based on the relationships of the Eucarida assumed by French paleontologists Pierre Guériau, Sylvain Charbonnier and Gaël Clément in 2014, based on the gradual modification of the first thoracopods into the maxillipeds seen in Decapoda.[2]
Eucarida |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paleoecology
Environment
The life environment of Angustidontus was low in diversity, but might have been very high in
Concavicarids, pelagic crustaceans of uncertain classification found in association with Angustidontus, also had chelicerae-like appendages and were covered in protective spines. They were predators, with known stomach contents including cephalopod remains as well as shark and teleost fish vertebrae. The appendages of concavicarids like Concavicaris differed in functionality from those of Angustiodontus and were thus likely used to catch other kinds of prey than what was eaten by Angustidontus. Concavicarids may not only have occupied a different niche, but an entirely different level in the water column.[1]
Prey
There are no
See also
- Pseudoangustidontus ("false Angustidontus"), a genus of radiodont
References
- ^ .
- ^ .
- JSTOR 1298344.
- ^ Raasch, Gilbert O. (1956). "Late Devonian and/or Mississippian faunal succession in Stettler area, Alberta". Journal of the Alberta Society of Petroleum Geologists. 4 (5): 112–118.
- ^ Copeland, Murray J.; Bolton, Thomas E. (1960). "The Eurypterida of Canada". Bulletin (60). Geological Survey of Canada: 13–47.
- ISSN 2330-7102.
- ^ Koch, Lutz; Gröning, Elke; Brauckmann, Carsten (2003). "Suttropcarididae n. fam. (Phyllocarida, Crustacea) aus dem Ober-Devon des Sauerlandes (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge)". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte (in German). 2003: 415–427.