Ground sloth

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Ground sloths
Temporal range: 35–0.005 
Ma
Late EoceneHolocene
American Museum of Natural History mounts of (from left) Megalocnus rodens, Scelidotherium cuvieri, Megalonyx wheatleyi, Glossotherium robustus
American Museum of Natural History mounts of (from left) Megalocnus rodens, Scelidotherium cuvieri, Megalonyx wheatleyi, Glossotherium robustus
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Pilosa
Suborder: Folivora
Families

Ground sloths are a diverse group of

paraphyletic group
, as living tree sloths are thought to have evolved from ground sloth ancestors.

The early evolution of ground sloths took place during the late Paleogene and Neogene of South America, while the continent was isolated. At their earliest appearance in the fossil record, they were already distinct at the family level. Sloths dispersed into the Greater Antilles during the Oligocene, and the presence of intervening islands between the American continents in the Miocene allowed a dispersal of some species into North America. They were hardy as evidenced by their high species diversity and their presence in a wide variety of environments, extending from the far south of Patagonia (Cueva del Milodón Natural Monument) to Alaska.[1][2][3] Sloths, and xenarthrans as a whole, represent one of the more successful South American groups during the Great American Interchange after the connection of North and South America during the late Pliocene with a number of ground sloth genera migrating northwards. One genus, Thalassocnus, even adapted for marine life along the Pacific coast of South America during the late Miocene and Pliocene epochs.

Ground sloths, which were represented by over 30 living species during the

kill sites
are known where humans butchered ground sloths dating just prior to their extinction.

The Caribbean ground sloths, the most recent survivors, lived on Cuba and Hispaniola, possibly until 1550 BCE. However, radiocarbon dating suggests an age of between 2819 and 2660 BCE for the last occurrence of Megalocnus in Cuba.[6] They survived 5,000–6,000 years longer in the Caribbean than on the American mainland, which correlates with the later colonization of this area by humans.[7]

Description

Anatomy

Glossotherium robustum (E, bottom left) and Catonyx cf. C. cuvieri
(F, bottom right)

Ground sloths varied widely in size from under 100 kilograms (220 lb) in the Caribbean ground sloths, to 3,700–4,100 kilograms (8,200–9,000 lb) in the largest ground sloth genera

Ecology

Ground sloths are generally regarded as herbivores, with some being browsers,[16] others grazers,[17] and some intermediate between the two as mixed feeders (both browsing and grazing),[18] though a number of authors have argued that some ground sloths may have been omnivores.[19] Sloths that had longer snouts are presumed to have had greater olfactory acuity, but appear to have also had less binocular vision and poorer ability to localize sounds. A number of extinct sloth species are thought to have had hearing abilities optimized for low frequencies, perhaps related to use of infrasound for communication.[20][21] Some ground sloths are suggested to have dug burrows.[22][23] Their skeletal anatomy suggests that they were incapable of running, and relied on other strategies to defend against predators,[24] though they were likely significantly more active and agile than living tree sloths.[25] Ground sloths were likely able to adopt a bipedal stance while stationary, allowing the forelimbs to be used to grasp vegetation as well as to use their claws for defence, though whether they were capable of moving in this posture is uncertain.[26][24] Some ground sloths have been suggested to be able to climb.[27] Some authors have suggested ground sloths were largely solitary animals, like living sloths,[28] though other authors have argued that at least some ground sloths are likely to have engaged in gregarious behaviour.[29] Whether or not ground sloths had a slow metabolism like living xenarthrans (including living sloths) is debated.[19]

Like living sloths, ground sloths likely only gave birth to a single offspring at a time,[30][31] with likely several years between the birth of offspring. At least some ground sloths engaged in long-term parental care, with one adult (presumably female) Megalonyx found with two juveniles of different ages, with the oldest juvenile suggested to be 3–4 years old.[31] Juvenile ground sloths may have clung to the body of their mother for some time following birth, as occurs in living tree sloths.[32]

Evolution

The earliest unambiguous fossil evidence of ground sloths comes from the early Oligocene.[33] Ground sloths had dispersed into the Caribbean already by 31 million years ago, as evidenced by a femur found in Puerto Rico.[34] During the Miocene, sloths diversified, with the major families of sloths appearing during this period,[34] with diversity waxing and waning over the course of the Miocene. Megalonychid and mylodontid sloths had migrated into North America by the Late Miocene, around 10 million years ago. At the end of the Miocene, ground sloth diversity declined, though their diversity would remain largely stable throughout the Pliocene and Pleistocene periods, up until their extinction. During the Pliocene and Pleistocene, as part of the Great American Interchange, additional lineages of sloths migrated into Central and North America.[35] Prior to their extinction, there were over 30 living species of ground sloths across the Americas during the Late Pleistocene.[8]

Families

genera of ground sloths to multiple families.[36]

Megalonychidae

The

Megalonyx jeffersonii from the last ice age. Some West Indian island species were as small as a large cat; their dwarf condition typified both tropical adaptation and their restricted island environment. This small size also enabled them a degree of arboreality.[37]

last (Wisconsin) glaciation, when so many large mammals died out. Remains have been found as far north as Alaska[38] and the Yukon.[39][40] Ongoing excavations at Tarkio Valley in southwestern Iowa may reveal something of the familial life of Megalonyx. An adult was found in direct association with two juveniles of different ages, suggesting that adults cared for young of different generations.[41][42]

The earliest known North American megalonychid, Pliometanastes protistus, lived in the southern U.S. about 9 million years ago and is believed to have been the predecessor of Megalonyx. Several species of Megalonyx have been named; in fact it has been stated that "nearly every good specimen has been described as a different species".[39] A broader perspective on the group, accounting for age, sex, individual and geographic differences, indicates that only three species are valid (M. leptostomus, M. wheatleyi, and M. jeffersonii) in the late Pliocene and Pleistocene of North America,[43] although work by McDonald lists five species. Jefferson's ground sloth has a special place in modern

Lewis and Clark set out, Jefferson instructed Meriwether Lewis to keep an eye out for ground sloths. He was hoping they would find some living in the Western range. Megalonyx jeffersonii was appropriately named after Thomas Jefferson.[39]

Megatheriidae

Fossil Eremotherium skeleton, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC.

The

Megatheria. Megatheriids appeared later in the Oligocene, some 30 million years ago, also in South America. The group includes the heavily built Megatherium (given its name 'great beast' by Georges Cuvier[44]) and Eremotherium, which are the largest known ground sloths, thought to have had body masses of 3.5-4 tons.[8]
The skeletal structure of these ground sloths indicates that the animals were massive. Their thick bones and even thicker joints (especially those on the hind legs) gave their appendages tremendous power that, combined with their size and fearsome claws, provided a formidable defense against predators.

The earliest megatheriid in North America was Eremotherium eomigrans which arrived 2.2 million years ago, after crossing the recently formed

plesiomorphic extra claw. While other species of Eremotherium had four fingers with only two or three claws, E. eomigrans had five fingers, four of them with claws up to nearly a foot long.[45]

Nothrotheriidae

Recently recognized, ground sloths of Nothrotheriidae are often associated with those of the Megatheriidae, and together the two form the superfamily Megatherioidea. The most prominent members of the group are the South American genus Thalassocnus, known for being aquatic, and Nothrotheriops from North America.

The last ground sloths in North America belonging to Nothrotheriops died so recently that their

Doña Ana County, New Mexico.[citation needed
]

Mylodontidae

Texas Memorial Museum, University of Texas at Austin

The

osteoderms embedded within their skin, though osteoderms were only present in a handful of genera and absent in many others.[52]

The largest mylodontid is Lestodon, with an estimated mass of 3,400–4,100 kilograms (7,500–9,000 lb).[53]

Scelidotheriidae

The ground sloth family

Choloepodidae, it was elevated back to full family status in 2019.[56] Together with Mylodontidae, the enigmatic Pseudoprepotherium and two-toed sloths, the scelidotheriids form the superfamily Mylodontoidea. Chubutherium is an ancestral and very plesiomorphic member of this subfamily and does not belong to the main group of closely related genera, which include Scelidotherium and Catonyx
.

Phylogeny

The following sloth family phylogenetic tree is based on collagen and mitochondrial DNA sequence data (see Fig. 4 of Presslee et al., 2019).[56]

  
Folivora
  
  Megalocnidae  
  (Caribbean sloths)  
  Megatherioidea  
  Nothrotheriidae  

Nothrotheriops shastensis

  Megatheriidae  

Megatherium americanum

  Megalonychidae  

Megalonyx jeffersoni

  
Bradypodidae
  

 

5 living spp.

 

(three-fingered sloths)
 
  Mylodontoidea  

Scelidotherium sp.

Scelidodon sp.

  
Choloepodidae
  

 

2 living spp.

(two-fingered sloths)
  Mylodontidae  

Lestodon armatus

Paramylodon harlani

Mylodon darwinii

Glossotherium robustus

Extinction

A Tamandua anteater in an upright defensive stance similar to those presumed to have been adopted by ground sloths, per trackways preserved in New Mexico
Subfossilized Nothrotheriops shastensis dung in Rampart Cave, Arizona (NPS
, 1938)


Radiocarbon dating places the disappearance of ground sloths in what is now the United States at around 11,000 years ago. The Shasta ground sloth (

Paramylodon ground sloths may record the scene of a hunt. The tracks are interpreted as showing seven instances of a sloth turning and rearing up on its hind legs to confront its pursuers, while the humans approach from multiple directions, possibly in an attempt to distract it.[58][59][60]

Those who argue in favor of humans being the direct cause of the ground sloths' extinction point out that the few sloths that remain are small sloths that spend most of their time in trees, making it difficult for them to be spotted. Although these sloths were well hidden, they still would have been affected by the climate changes that others claim wiped out the ground sloths. Additionally, after the continental ground sloths disappeared, insular sloths of the Caribbean survived for approximately 6,000 years longer, which correlates with the fact that these islands were not colonized by humans until about 5500 yr BP.[7]

It is difficult to find evidence that supports either claim on whether humans hunted the ground sloths to extinction.[61] Removing large amounts of meat from large mammals such as the ground sloth requires no contact with the bones; tool-inflicted damage to bones is a key sign of human interaction with the animal.[62]

Hunting of ground sloths

Kill sites

A number of kill sites are known for ground sloths in the Americas, these include Campo Laborde in the Pampas of Argentina, where an individual of

Megalonyx jeffersoni skeleton dubbed the "Firelands Ground Sloth" has cut marks indicative of butchery, dating to 13,738 to 13,435 years BP.[65] At the Santa Elina rockshelter in Mato Grosso Brazil, a specimen of Glossotherium is associated with hearths and stone tools, dating to 11,833–11,804 years BP. At Fell's Cave in southern Chilean Patagonia, a specimen of Mylodon with fractured and burned bones associated with human activity has been dated to approximately 12,766–12,354 years BP.[64]

Hunting weapons

Humans are believed to have entered the New World via

atlatl became widely used, which allowed them to throw spears with greater velocity.[67]
These inventions would have allowed hunters to put distance between them and their prey, potentially making it less dangerous to approach ground sloths.

Advantages

Certain characteristics and behavioral traits of the ground sloths made them easy targets for human hunting and provided hunter-gatherers with strong incentives to hunt these large mammals.

Ground sloths often fed in open fields.[68] Recent studies have attempted to discover the diet of ground sloths through fossils of their dung. Analysis of these coproliths have found that ground sloths often ate the foliage of trees, hard grasses, shrubs, and yucca; these plants were located in areas that would have exposed them,[69] making them susceptible to human predation. Ground sloths were not only easy to spot, but had never interacted with humans before, so would not have known how to react to them. Additionally, these large mammals waddled on their hind legs and front knuckles, keeping their claws turned in. Their movement and massive build (some weighed up to 3,000 kilograms (6,600 lb)) imply they were relatively slow mammals.[7]

These reasonable after-the-fact inferences from the evidence might explain why ground sloths would have been easy prey for hunters, but are not certain.[70]

Difficulties

While ground sloths would have been relatively easy to spot and approach, big game hunters' weapons would have been useless from farther than 9.1 metres (30 ft) away. It would have been difficult to take down a ground sloth with a spear-thrower and would have required extensive knowledge of the species. Additionally, the ground sloths' already thick hide was fortified by osteoderms, making it difficult to penetrate.[62][71]

Since ground sloths thrived in an environment filled with large predators, they evidently would have been able to also defend themselves against human predation, so there is no reason to expect that they would have been "easy pickings". When feeding, they had enough strength to use their long, sharp claws to tear apart tree branches; presumably their strength and formidable claws would be dangerous for hunters that attempted to attack them at close quarters.[72] But fossilized evidence of humans hunting on ground sloth in White Sands National Park suggests that the slow-moving giant sloths were likely easy prey for early humans possibly hurling spears.[58][59]

References

  1. ^ C.M. Hogan (2008)
  2. PMID 17790868
    .
  3. .
  4. .
  5. ^ Mason, Betsy (August 1, 2005). "Humans Drove Giant Sloths to Extinction". www.science.org. Retrieved 2022-10-02.
  6. S2CID 56003217
    . Retrieved 11 May 2009.
  7. ^ .
  8. ^ .
  9. .
  10. ^ .
  11. ^ Resar, N. A., Green, J. L., & McAfee, R. K. (2013). Reconstructing paleodiet in ground sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra) using dental microwear analysis. Kirtlandia, 58, 61–72.
  12. ^
    PMID 27297516
    .
  13. ^ .
  14. .
  15. ^ H.G. McDonald Biomechanical inferences of locomotion in ground sloths: integrating morphological and track data. New Mexico Mus Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull., 42 (2007), pp. 201-208
  16. .
  17. .
  18. .
  19. ^ .
  20. .
  21. .
  22. ^ Yizcaino,S.F.,Zdrate, M., Bargo, M.S., & Dondas, A. 2001. Pleistocene burrows in the Mar del Plata area (Argentina) and their probable builders. - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 46, 2, 289-301
  23. S2CID 133305289
    .
  24. ^ .
  25. .
  26. .
  27. .
  28. .
  29. .
  30. .
  31. ^ .
  32. .
  33. .
  34. ^ .
  35. .
  36. ^ Modified from McKenna & Bell (1997)
  37. ^ J.L. White (1993)
  38. PMID 17790868
    .
  39. ^ a b c d Harrington (1993)
  40. doi:10.14430/arctic852. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 3 July 2020. Retrieved 16 August 2008.
  41. ^ Semken and Brenzel, http://slothcentral.com/?page_id=2 Archived 2009-01-01 at the Wayback Machine
  42. ^ Semken; Brenzel (2007). "One Sloth Becomes Three". Newsletter of the Iowa Archeological Society. 57: 1.
  43. ^ Kurtén & Anderson, 1980, p. 136.
  44. ^ G. Cuvier (1796)
  45. ^ De Iuliis and Cartelle (1999)
  46. ^ A. S. Woodward (1900)
  47. S2CID 85808869. Archived from the original
    on 8 October 2012. Retrieved 29 January 2009.
  48. .
  49. ^ Roosevelt, T.R. (1915-01-04). "Letter from Theodore Roosevelt to George Herbert Sherwood". theodorerooseveltcenter.org. Dickinson State University. Retrieved 2019-10-12.
  50. ^ "Roosevelt Collections". amnh.org/exhibitions. American Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 2019-10-12.
  51. ^ Warren, D. (2016-05-28). "The ground sloth". Essays in Idleness. Retrieved 2019-10-12.
  52. S2CID 254697023
    .
  53. .
  54. ^ "Scelidotheriinae, basic info". PaleoBiology Database.
  55. JSTOR 4523658
    .
  56. ^ .
  57. . Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  58. ^ a b Garisto, D. (2018-04-25). "Footprints prove humans hunted giant sloths during the Ice Age". Science News. Society for Science & the Public. Retrieved 2018-04-26.
  59. ^ a b Stock, M. (2018-04-25). "Giant sloth vs. ancient man: fossil footprints track prehistoric hunt". Reuters.com. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  60. PMID 29707640
    .
  61. S2CID 16109915. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2017-02-02.
  62. ^ .
  63. .
  64. ^ .
  65. .
  66. .
  67. .
  68. ^ Bargo, M.S. (2001). "The ground sloth Megatherium americanum: Skull shape, bite forces, and diet" (PDF). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 46 (2): 173–192. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
  69. S2CID 7577657
    .
  70. . Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  71. ^ Naish, Darren (30 August 2012). "The anatomy of sloths". Scientific American. Retrieved 25 October 2020.
  72. ^ Lull, Richard S. (1931). Fossils: What they tell us of plants and animals of the past. New York, NY: University Society.

Sources

  • Cuvier, G. (1796). "Notice sur le squellette d'une très grande espèce de quadrupède inconnue jusqu'à présent, trouvé au Paraquay, et déposé au cabinet d'histoire naturelle de Madrid". Magasin encyopédique, ou Journal des Sciences, des Lettres et des Arts. 1: 303–310.; (2): 227–228.