Haijin
Haijin | |
---|---|
Hanyu Pinyin | Bìguān Suǒguó |
The Haijin (海禁) or sea ban was a series of related
First imposed to deal with
The Chinese policy was mimicked in other
respectively.Ming dynasty
Background
The 14th century was a time of chaos throughout
The loose control over Japan's periphery led to pirates setting up bases on the realm's outlying islands,[4] particularly Tsushima, Iki, and the Gotōs.[5][6] These wokou ("dwarf pirates") raided Japan as well as Korea and China.[4]
As a rebel leader, Zhu Yuanzhang promoted foreign trade as a source of revenue.
The
A 1613 edict prohibited maritime trade between the lands north and south of the Yangtze River, attempting to put a stop to captains claiming to be heading to Jiangsu and then diverting to Japan.[15]
Rationale
Although the policy has generally been ascribed to national defense against the pirates,
Effects
The policy offered too little—decennial tribute missions comprising only two ships—as a reward for good behavior and enticement for Japanese authorities to root out their smugglers and pirates.[16] The Hongwu Emperor's message to the Japanese that his army would "capture and exterminate your bandits, head straight for your country, and put your king in bonds"[23] received the Ashikaga shogun's reply that "your great empire may be able to invade Japan but our small state is not short of a strategy to defend ourselves".[16]
Although the sea ban left the Ming army free to extirpate the remaining Yuan loyalists and secure China's borders, it tied up local resources. 74 coastal garrisons were established from Guangzhou in Guangdong to Shandong;[11] under the Yongle Emperor, these outposts were notionally manned by 110,000 subjects.[24] The loss of income from taxes on trade[11] contributed to chronic funding difficulties throughout the Ming, particularly for Zhejiang and Fujian provinces.[25] By impoverishing and provoking both coastal Chinese and Japanese against the regime,[16] it increased the problem it was purporting to solve.[26] The initial wave of Japanese pirates had been independently dealt with by Jeong Mong-ju and Imagawa Sadayo, who returned their booty and slaves to Korea;[5][6] Ashikaga Yoshimitsu delivered 20 more to China in 1405, which boiled them alive in a cauldron in Ningbo.[27] However, the raids on China continued, most grievously under the Jiajing Emperor.[25] By the 16th century, the "Japanese", "dwarf", and "eastern barbarian" pirates of the Jiajing wokou raids were mostly non-Japanese.[4][26][28]
Nonetheless, because the sea ban was added by the Hongwu Emperor to his
The sea ban was largely unenforceable from its earliest years, and no effective enforcement was ever implemented. Local authorities themselves were frequently involved in the illicit trade, and usually ignored edicts to restrict trade. Military officers brokered trade deals and the wealthy families in the coastal settlements depended on its income. Ordinary workers found employment in trade-related industries. Many of the official posts to enforce trade regulations were left vacant and the Maritime Trading Intendancies were abolished. The court generally ignored the issue of overseas trade. In the 1520s the emperor rejected all attempts to halt the trade as these came from officials who had opposed the emperor's policy of rituals, and very little trade took place under governmental channels instead of illicit means. The Grand secretary of the court in the 1530s was from coastal Zhejiang province, and he proceeded to block any attempt to enforce the sea ban. The most significant attempt to crush out the illicit trade was made by Zhu Wan, an official appointed by the court in the 1540s, but just as he was making headway in wiping out the smugglers he was removed by the court on accusations of unauthorised killings.[33]
Piracy dropped to negligible levels only after the general abolition of the policy in 1567
The lifting of the sea ban coincided with the arrival of the first Spanish galleons from the Americas, creating a global trade link that would not be interrupted until the following century.[37]
China in the global trading system
China acted as the cog running the wheel of global trade.[38] Trade with Japan continued unobstructed despite the embargo, through Chinese smugglers, Southeast Asian ports, or Portuguese. China was entirely integrated in the world trading system.[39]
European nations had a great desire for Chinese goods such as silk and porcelain.[40] The Europeans did not have any goods or commodities which China desired, so they traded silver to make up for their trade deficit.[41] Spaniards at the time of the Age of Exploration discovered vast amounts of silver, much of which was from the Potosí silver mines, to fuel their trade economy. Spanish American silver mines were the world's cheapest sources of it,[42] producing 40,000 tons of silver in 200 years.[43] The ultimate destination for the mass amounts of silver produced in the Americas and Japan was China.[44] From 1500 to 1800, Mexico and Peru produced about 80%[45] of the world's silver with 30% of it eventually ending up in China. In the late 16th and early 17th century, Japan was also exporting silver heavily into China.[45] Silver from the Americas flowed mostly across the Atlantic and made its way to the far east.[41] Major outposts for the silver trade were located in Southeast Asian countries, such as the Philippines.[46] The city of Manila served as a primary outpost of the exchange of goods between the Americas, Japan, India, Indonesia and China.[46] However, there was a large amount of silver that crossed across the Pacific Ocean directly from the Americas as well.[44]
Trade with Ming China via Manila served a major source of revenue for the Spanish Empire and as a fundamental source of income for Spanish colonists in the Philippine Islands. Until 1593, two or more ships would set sail annually from each port.[47] The galleon trade was supplied by merchants largely from port areas of Fujian who traveled to Manila to sell the Spaniards spices, porcelain, ivory, lacquerware, processed silk cloth and other valuable commodities. Cargoes varied from one voyage to another but often included goods from all over Asia - jade, wax, gunpowder and silk from China; amber, cotton and rugs from India; spices from Indonesia and Malaysia; and a variety of goods from Japan, including fans, chests, screens and porcelain.[48]
Qing dynasty
Background
As the
Policy
The
Repressive Qing policies such as the
Legal trade in the South China Sea was resumed in 1727,
Effects
The initial Qing sea ban curtailed Koxinga's influence on the Chinese mainland and ended with
Nonetheless, it was quite harmful to the Chinese themselves, as documented in governors' and viceroys' memorials to the throne. Even before the Kangxi Emperor's restrictions, Jin Fu's 1659 memorial to the throne argued that the ban on foreign trade was limiting China's access to silver, harmfully restricting the money supply, and that lost trading opportunities cost Chinese merchants 7 or 8 million
European countries' trade with China was so extensive that they were forced to risk silver deficits to supply merchants in Asia.[55] As supplies of silver decreased in Europe, Europeans had less ability to purchase highly coveted Chinese goods. Merchants were no longer able to sustain the China trade through profits made by selling Chinese goods in the West and were forced to take bullion out of circulation in Europe to buy goods in China.[56]
The restrictions imposed by the Qianlong Emperor that established the Canton System were highly lucrative for Guangzhou's Cohong—the merchant
See also
- Economy of the Ming dynasty and Imperial China
- First and Second Opium Wars
- Great Divergence
- Isolationism
- Tokugawa Japan
References
Citations
- ISBN 9780674054554, retrieved August 31, 2023
- ^ Martin (2001), p. 14.
- ^ a b McNeill (1998).
- ^ a b c Wang (1980), p. 31.
- ^ a b Ōta, Kōki (2004), 『倭寇: 日本あふれ活動史』 [Wakō: Nihon Afure Katsudōshi], Bungeisha, p. 98. (in Japanese)
- ^ a b Kawazoe, Shōji (1996), 「対外関係の史的展開」 [Taigai Kankei no Shiteki Tenkai], Bunken Shuppan, p. 167. (in Japanese)
- ^ a b c Von Glahn (1996), p. 90.
- ^ a b Von Glahn (1996), p. 116.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), p. 91.
- ^ Li (2010), p. 3.
- ^ a b c d e f Li (2010), p. 4.
- ISBN 978-0-521-24332-2.
- ISBN 039324251X.
- ISBN 978-0-521-24332-2.
- ^ a b Von Glahn (1996), p. 281.
- ^ a b c d Li (2010), p. 13.
- ISBN 978-0-521-24332-2.
- ISBN 978-0-521-24332-2.
- ^ Fairbank & al. (2006), p. 134.
- ^ Li (2010), p. 24–5.
- OCLC 32349203.
- ^ Li (2010), p. 12.
- ^ Kang (2007), p. 28.
- ISBN 0-295-98124-5.
- ^ a b c Shi (2006), p. 7.
- ^ a b Li (2010), p. 17.
- ^ Takekoshi, Yosaburō (1967), The Economic Aspects of the History of the Civilization of Japan, p. 344.
- ^ Li (2010)
- ^ Li (2010), p. 168.
- ^ Knight's (1841), p. 136.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), p. 117.
- ^ a b c d Von Glahn (1996), p. 118.
- ISBN 978-0-521-24332-2.
- ^ Deng (1999).
- ^ a b c d e Shi (2006), p. 8.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), p. 119.
- ISBN 978-0-521-24332-2.
- S2CID 145805906.
- ISBN 039324251X.
- JSTOR 20078638.
- ^ ISBN 9780520214743.
- ^ "A Century of Lawmaking". Library of Congress. Retrieved May 23, 2018.
- ISBN 9780801861352.
- ^ S2CID 145805906.
- ^ a b Flynn, Dennis O. (1995). "Born with a "Silver Spoon": The Origin of World Trade in 1571". Journal of World History. University of Hawaii Press.
- ^ JSTOR 42634185.
- ^ Schurz, William Lytle. The Manila Galleon, 1939. P 193.
- ^ Mejia, Javier. "The Economics of the Manila Galleon". New York University, Abu Dhabi.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ a b Hayes (1974), p. 119.
- ^ a b c d e Shi (2006), p. 9.
- ^ a b Shi (2006), p. 10.
- ISBN 039324251X.
- ^ Von Glahn (1996), p. 216.
- ^ Hayes (1974), pp. 127–8.
- ^ Peyrefitte, Alain (1992). The Immobile Empire—The first great collision of East and West—the astonishing history of Britain's grand, ill-fated expedition to open China to Western Trade, 1792–94. Alfred A. Knopf.
- ^ Gray, Jack (2002). Rebellions and Revolutions: China from the 1800s to 2000. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 22–3.
- ISBN 978-0495913238.
- ^ Po, Chung-yam (28 June 2013). Conceptualizing the Blue Frontier: The Great Qing and the Maritime World in the Long Eighteenth Century (PDF) (Thesis). Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg. pp. 149–150.
- ISBN 978-1472526403.
Bibliography
- "Commercial Intercourse with China", Knight's Store of Knowledge for All Readers, Charles Knight & Co., 1841, pp. 129–152.
- Deng Gang (1999), Maritime Sector, Institutions, and Sea Power of Premodern China, Greenwood Press, ISBN 0-313-30712-1.
- Fairbank, John K.; et al. (2006), China: A New History (2nd ed.), ISBN 0-674-01828-1.
- ISSN 1991-7295.
- Kang, David Chan-oong (2007), China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia, New York: Columbia University Press, ISBN 978-0-231-14188-8.
- Li Kangying (2010), The Ming Maritime Trade Policy in Transition, 1368 to 1567, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, ISBN 9783447061728.
- Martin, Sean (2001), Black Death, Harpenden, p. 14.
- McNeill, William Hardy (1998), Plagues and Peoples, Anchor, ISBN 978-0-385-12122-4.
- Shi Zhihong (2006), "China's Overseas Trade Policy and Its Historical Results: 1522–1840", Intra-Asian Trade and the World Market, Studies in the Modern History of Asia, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 4–23, ISBN 9781134194087.
- Von Glahn, Richard (1996), Fountain of Fortune: Money and Monetary Policy in China, 1000–1700, Berkeley: University of California Press, ISBN 0-520-20408-5.
- Wang Xiangrong (1980), "Periodizing the History of Sino-Japanese Relations" (PDF), Sino-Japanese Studies, vol. 2.