Indo-Roman relations

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
Indo–Roman relations
)
Periplus Maris Erythraei
, 1st century CE.

The first documented relations between

Roman Emperor
.

The presence of Europeans, including Romans, in the region known at the time as "India" (modern South Asia, including India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and eastern-Afghanistan), during the period of the Roman Empire, is poorly documented. Before the conquests of Alexander, there are no surviving accounts by contemporaries or near-contemporaries of contact between Europe and the South Asia, so modern understanding depends on more abundant literary, numismatic, and archaeological evidence, mainly relating to the trade between them. The Romans were referred as Romakas in India while the Romans referred Indians as Indos.

Early contacts

Kushan ring with portraits of Septimius Severus and Julia Domna, a testimony to Indo-Roman relations.
Further information: Sino-Roman relations and Indo-Roman trade relations

Indo-Roman relations were built on trade. Roman trade in India began with overland caravans and later by direct maritime trade following the conquest of Egypt by Augustus in 30 BCE.

According to Strabo (II.5.12), not long after Augustus took control of Egypt, while Gallus was Prefect of Egypt (26–24 BCE), up to 120 ships were setting sail every year from Myos Hormos to modern-day India:

"At any rate, when

Ptolemies, only a very few ventured to undertake the voyage and to carry on traffic in Indian merchandise."

— Strabo II.5.12. [2]

Augustus maintained the Ptolemaic Red Sea ports and the picket service from the Red Sea to the Nile, whence goods could be carried downstream to the ports of Pelusium and Alexandria. He also replaced the Ptolemaic patrol fleet on the Red Sea to keep piracy in check. He received embassies from Indian kings in 26 and 20 BCE and, although little specific is known about them, as Carey puts it: "These missions were certainly intended for something more than an exchange of empty compliments."[1]

By the time of Augustus, if not before, a sea-captain named Hippalus had "discovered" (or, rather, brought news to the West of) the relatively safe and punctual contact over the open sea to India by leaving from Aden on the summer monsoon and returning on the anti-trade winds of winter. This would be made safer and more convenient by the Roman sack of Aden in a naval raid c. 1 BCE.[2]

Cassius Dio (d. sometime after 229 CE) in his Hist. Rom. 54.9 wrote:

Many embassies came to him (Augustus), and the Indians having previously proclaimed a treaty of alliance, concluded it now with the presentation, among other gifts, of tigers, animals which the Romans, and, if I mistake not, the Greeks as well, saw for the first time. . . .[3]

The overland caravans would gain more convenient access into India after the expansion of the

Kushans into northern India during the 1st century CE, and then down the Ganges Valley in the early 2nd century.[4]

"From those land routes at least in the time of Augustus several embassies reached Rome. At least four such embassies are mentioned in the Latin literature, namely 1) the embassy from

Pandya Kingdom) brought with it precious stones, pearls and an elephant. We know that in the time of Augustus commercial relations between India and Rome grew but in this the balance of trade was in favour of India from the very beginning and as a result of this Roman gold poured into the country."[5]

The Periplus

The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, written by an anonymous sea-captain in Greek, can now be confidently dated to between 40 and 70[6] and, probably, between 40 and 50 CE.[7]

The author of the Periplus lists ports from Barbarikon at the mouth of the Indus in the west near modern Karachi, right around the southern tip of the Indian peninsula and north as far as the mouth of the Ganges near modern Kolkata (Calcutta). In contrast to the wealth of information on some of the west coast ports, the author gives no political information on the ports up the east coast of India,[8] perhaps indicating that he had not personally visited them. In fact the text seems to imply that western vessels normally did not travel beyond the tip of Indian peninsula, probably leaving onward trade to local boats as the passage between India and the northern tip of Palaisimundu or Taprobanê (Sri Lanka) was very shallow for trans-oceanic vessels, while the route around the island was long[9] and may have forced skippers to pass another season in the region before the winds were right for the return to Egypt.

Pliny's accounts

Indian art also found its way into Italy: in 1938 the Pompeii Lakshmi was found in the ruins of Pompeii (destroyed in an eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 CE).

Gaius Plinius Secundus (23–79 CE), generally known as Pliny the Elder, writing c. 77 CE, left probably the most important account of India and its trade with Rome that has survived in Classical literature. He gives quite a lot of detail about India, albeit not all accurate, but his observations do more than just outline the bare bones of history, and help give us some picture of how intimately Indian culture and trade was becoming known:

"Coral is as highly valued among the Indians as Indian pearls. It is also found in the Red Sea, but there it is darker in colour. The most prized is found in the Gallic Gulf around the Stoechades Islands, in the Sicilian Gulf around the Aeolian Islands, and around Drepanum. . . . Coral-berries are no less valued by Indian men than specimen Indian pearls by Roman ladies. Indian soothsayers and seers believe that coral is potent as a charm for warding off dangers. Accordingly they delight in its beauty and religious power. Before this became known, the Gauls used to decorate their swords, shields and helmets with coral. Now it is very scarce because of the price it commands, and is rarely seen in its natural habitat." Pliny. Natural History (77 CE) (XXXII, chaps. 21, 23).[10]

Although his estimate of the value of Rome's trade to the East at some 100 million

sesterces
annually (Pliny, NH, VI, 26, 6 & NH, XII, 41, 2) has often been thought to be an exaggeration but, if it is interpreted as referring to the total value of the trade rather than as coinage, it becomes quite believable:

"For example, just one documented consignment from

talents, enough to purchase 2,400 acres of the best farmland in Egypt. When it is borne in mind that an average Roman cargo ship would have held about 150 such consignments, Pliny's figure becomes entirely plausible. With such staggering profits it is little wonder that the Roman government in Egypt encouraged – and profited by! – the trade: a 25 per cent tax on all goods from India was levied by the Romans at the Red Sea port of Leuce Come."[11]

Trajan

After the Roman Emperor

Nabataean Arabs centered in Petra
c. 105 CE, he returned to Rome where:

"...ever so many embassies came to him from various barbarians, including the Sindi [people of the

Indus Valley]. And he gave spectacles on one hundred and twenty-three days, in the course of which some eleven thousand animals, both wild and tame, were slain, and ten thousand gladiators fought."[12]

Trajan later defeated

Tigris River (115–16), reached the northern shores of the Persian Gulf.[13] "Roman troops had beaten the might of Parthia from the field and had reached the Persian Gulf; and their victorious Imperator, Trajan, had dreamed of repeating Alexander's march to the northwestern subcontinent, only to acquiesce in giving up the project on account of his age."[14]

Later references

Peutinger Table
.

The

Peutinger Table, a medieval copy of a 4th or early 5th century map of the world, shows a "Temple to Augustus" at Muziris, one of the main ports for trade to the Roman Empire on the southwest coast of India.[15] This and evidence of agreements for loans between agents, one of whom most likely lived in Muziris, and a rather oblique reference in the Periplus, all seem to point to a settlement of Roman subjects living in the region.[16]

Embassies are recorded as arriving from the "Indians of the East" at the court of Constantine the Great (r. 306–337):

"Ambassadors from the Indians of the East brought presents . . . . which they presented to the king (Constantine the Great) as an acknowledgment that his sovereignty extended to their ocean. They told him, too, how Princes of India had dedicated pictures and statues in his honour in token that they had recognised him as their autocrat and king."

Eusebius of Caesarea (fl. early 4th century) Vita Constantini IV. 50.[17]

More embassies are mentioned from "the Indian nations" in 361 CE:

"Embassies from all quarters flocked to him (the

Emperor Julian in 361 A.D.), the Indian nations vying with emulous zeal in sending their foremost men with presents, as far as from the Divi (Maldives) and the Serendivi (Ceylonese) [sic]." Ammianus Marcellinus. History XXII.vii.10.[18]

Finally, Johannes Malala or John Malalas (fl. mid-6th century), p. 477, records that, in 530 CE, "an ambassador of the Indians was sent to Constantinople."[17]

Archaeological record

Roman piece of pottery from Arezzo in Italy, found at Virampatnam, Arikamedu (1st century CE).
The Berenike Buddha, discovered in Berenice, Egypt.

The best archeological record of Roman presence can be found in southern India, specifically at Arikamedu.

Arikamedu was a

Tamil fishing village which was formerly a major Chola port dedicated to bead making and trading with Roman
traders. It flourished for centuries until the Romans left in the 5th century CE.

Various Roman artifacts, such as a large number of

ancient Tamil country
, which today include Tamil Nadu and regions of Sri Lanka.

Another place full of archeological records is

Chera Empire and the Roman Empire. Large hoards of coins and innumerable shards of amphorae found in the town of Pattanam have elicited recent archeological interest in finding a probable location of this port city.[19]

A statue of the Buddha, the

Berenike.[20]

Numismatic record

Numerous hoards of Roman gold coins from the time of Augustus and emperors of the 1st and 2nd centuries CE have been from southern India. Attention may be drawn to the large number of Roman aurei and denarii of Augustus to Nero spanning approximately 120 years, found all along the route from about Mangalore through the Muziris area and around the southern tip of India to the south eastern Indian ports.

Under the rule of Augustus, (63 BCE–CE 14) the silver content of the denarius fell to 3.9 grams. It remained at nearly this weight until the time of Nero (CE 37–68).[21][22] This would also indicate that the land route from the West coast to the East coast via the Palghat pass in the Western Ghats was much more popular than the risky or circuitous sea route rounding the Cape or Sri Lanka.[21]

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ Carey (1954), p. 496.
  2. ^ Carey (1954), pp. 567.
  3. ^ Majumdar (1960), pp. 451–452.
  4. ^ Hill (2003).
  5. ^ Chandra (1977), p. 111.
  6. ^ Casson (1989) p. 7.
  7. ^ Fussman (1991), pp. 37–38.
  8. ^ Casson (1989), p. 47.
  9. ^ Casson (1989), pp. 24, 83, 89.
  10. ^ Healy (1991), p. 281.
  11. ^ Ball (2000), p. 123.
  12. Dio Cassius, Roman History Bk. 68 [1]
  13. ^ Carey (1954), p. 646.
  14. ^ Narain (1968), p. 233.
  15. ^ Ball (2000), p. 123
  16. ^ Casson (1989), p. 24.
  17. ^ a b Majumdar (1960), p. 453.
  18. ^ Majumdar (1960), p. 452.
  19. ^ BBC News: Search for Muziris
  20. ^ Magazine, Smithsonian; Parker, Christopher. "Archaeologists Unearth Buddha Statue in Ancient Egyptian Port City". Smithsonian Magazine.
  21. ^ a b George Menachery, 'Kodungallur...' (1987, repr. 2000)
  22. ^ "Kodungallur : The Cradle of Christianity in India 2000".

References

External links

  • [4] "The present text has been digitalized from the translation of William H. Schoff, The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea: Travel and Trade in the Indian Ocean by a Merchant of the First Century (New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1912). Some additional commentary including alternate spellings or translations from Lionel Casson's more recent edition are given in square brackets."
  • Ancient history sourcebook: The basic text from Schoff's 1912 translation.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Roman_relations&oldid=1219204732"