Islamization of Iran

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Islamization of Iran was the

culture, and adapted them with Islamic codes. These two customs and traditions merged as the "Iranian Islamic" identity.[1]

The Islamization of Iran was to yield deep transformations within the cultural, scientific, and political structure of Iran's society: The blossoming of Persian literature, philosophy, medicine and art became major elements of the newly forming Muslim civilization. Integrating a heritage of thousands of years of civilization, and being at the "crossroads of the major cultural highways",[2] contributed to Persia emerging at the forefront of what culminated as the "Islamic Golden Age".

Iranian culture after Islam

Persian policies after the Islamic conquest

After the Islamic conquest of the

Pahlavi script. The controversial Umayyad governor Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf forced all the mawali who had left for cities, in order to avoid paying the kharaj tax, to return to their lands. He was upset at the usage of Persian as the court language in the eastern Islamic empire, and ordered that it be changed to Arabic.[3]

There are a number of historians who see the rule of the Umayyads as setting up the "

.

Islamization policies

During the following

Abbasid period an enfranchisement was experienced by the mawali and a shift was made in political conception from that of a primarily Arab empire to one of a Muslim empire[5] and c. 930 a requirement was enacted that required all bureaucrats of the empire be Muslim.[4] Both periods were also marked by significant migrations of Arab tribes outwards from the Arabian Peninsula into the new territories.[5]


Before the conquest, the Persians had been mainly

Khurasan, Tabaristan, al Djibal, Azerbaijan and Arran.

This general statement of al Masudi is fully supported by the medieval geographers who make mention of fire temples in most of the Iranian towns.[6]

Also, Islam was readily accepted by

occurred during the reign of Samanids in the 9th century.

Abbasid period which saw the Muslim population go from approx. 40% in the mid 9th century to close to 80% by the end of the 11th century.[5]

The emergence of Iranian Muslim dynasties has a great effect on changing religion as Seyyed Hossein Nasr says.[9] These dynasties have adopted some Persian language cultural values and adapted them with Islam.

Shu'ubiyya and Persianization policies

Although Persians adopted the religion of their conquerors, over the centuries they worked to protect and revive their distinctive language and culture, a process known as Persianization. Arabs and Turks participated in this attempt.[10][11][12][13]

In the 9th and 10th centuries, non-Arab subjects of the

Persian culture and protecting Persian identity, though within a Muslim context. It was a response to the growing Arabization of Islam in the earlier centuries. The most notable effect of the movement was the survival of Persian language
, the language of the Persians, to the present day.

The

.

However, after the reign of the

Saffarids, while continuing to patronize Arabic to a significant degree.[15]

The

Samanid dynasty was the first fully native dynasty to rule Iran since the Muslim conquest and led the revival of Persian culture. The first important Persian poet after the arrival of Islam, Rudaki, was born during this era and was praised by Samanid kings. The Samanids also revived many ancient Persian festivals. Their successor, the Ghaznawids
, who were of non-Iranian origin, also became instrumental in the revival of Persian.

The

Shi'a Buyid rulers, adopted a similar attitude in this regard. They tried to revive many of the Sassanid customs and traditions. They even adopted the ancient Persian title of Shahanshah
(King of Kings) for their rulers.

After the rise of the

upon the majority of the Iranian population.

Iranian influence on Islamic culture and civilization

According to Bernard Lewis:

"Iran was indeed Islamized, but it was not Arabized. Persians remained Persians. And after an interval of silence, Iran reemerged as a separate, different and distinctive element within Islam, eventually adding a new element even to Islam itself. Culturally, politically, and most remarkable of all even religiously, the Iranian contribution to this new Islamic civilization is of immense importance. The work of Iranians can be seen in every field of cultural endeavor, including Arabic poetry, to which poets of Iranian origin composing their poems in Arabic made a very significant contribution. In a sense, Iranian Islam is a second advent of Islam itself, a new Islam sometimes referred to as Islam-i Ajam. It was this Persian Islam, rather than the original Arab Islam, that was brought to new areas and new peoples: to the Turks, first in Central Asia and then in the Middle East in the country which came to be called Turkey, and of course to India. The Ottoman Turks brought a form of Iranian civilization to the walls of Vienna."[1]

Persians had a great influence on their conquerors. The caliphs adopted many Sassanid administrative practices, such as coinage, the office of

Sassanid architecture had a distinctive influence over Islamic architecture
.

Arabic was not seen as an alien language but the language of Islam and thereby Arabic was widely accepted as an academic and religious language and embraced in many parts of Iran. It was for the sake of the Holy Qur'an and Islam that books of philosophy, mysticism, history, medicine, mathematics, and law
had been written or translated into this language.

Persians also contributed greatly to Arabic learning and

Academy of Gundishapur
is particularly worthy of note.

New York Metropolitan Museum of Art
.

The New Persian language written in the Arabic alphabet with some modifications was formed in the late ninth century in eastern Iran and came to flourish in

Samanid
dynasty.

Persian language, because of its strong support from later Abbasid rulers condoning the language became one of the universal Islamic languages, next to Arabic.

The most important scholars of almost all of the Islamic sects and schools of thought were Persian or live in Iran including most notable and reliable

Abdul-Qadir Gilani
.

In 1377, the

Arab sociologist, Ibn Khaldun, narrates in his Muqaddimah:[17]

"It is a remarkable fact that, with few exceptions, most Muslim scholars ... in the intellectual sciences have been non-Arabs, thus the founders of grammar were

Sibawaih and after him, al-Farsi and Az-Zajjaj. All of them were of Persian descent they invented rules of (Arabic) grammar. Great jurists were Persians. Only the Persians engaged in the task of preserving knowledge and writing systematic scholarly works. Thus the truth of the statement of the prophet (Muhammad
) becomes apparent, 'If learning were suspended in the highest parts of heaven the Persians would attain it "... The intellectual sciences were also the preserve of the Persians, left alone by the Arabs, who did not cultivate them...as was the case with all crafts. ... This situation continued in the cities as long as the Persians and Persian countries, Iraq, Khorasan, and Transoxiana (modern Central Asia), retained their sedentary culture."

One Abbasid Caliph is even quoted as saying:

"The Persians ruled for a thousand years and did not need us Arabs even for a day. We have been ruling them for one or two centuries and cannot do without them for an hour."[18]

Social relations

Patrick Clawson states that "The Iranians chafed under Umayyad rule. The Umayyads rose from traditional Arab aristocracy. They tended to marry other Arabs, creating an ethnic stratification that discriminated against Iranians. Even as Arabs adopted traditional Iranian bureaucracy, Arab tribalism disadvantaged Iranians."[19]

The Arab conquerors, according to many historians, formed "a ruling aristocracy with special rights and privileges, which they emphatically did not propose to share with the mawali".

Hajjaj ibn Yusuf even went as far as viewing the Mawali as "barbarians", implementing harsh policies such as branding to keep the subjects in check.[21]

The case of

Hajjaj
is particularly noteworthy as many reports have come down to us from his racial policies and iron tactics in governing the provinces. And yet many skeptics point to the fact that some of these reports were written by Abbasid era writers who may have had a skewed view of their predecessors.

However, Hajjaj was not the only case of cruelty against the Mawali.

Isfahan for example cut off the heads of any of the Mawali who failed to pay their taxes,[23] and Ibn Athir in his al-kāmil reports that Sa'id ibn al-'Ās killed all but one person in the port city of Tamisah, during his incursion to Gorgan
in the year 651.

Such tumultuous conditions eventually were responsible for the rise of the

Samanids
.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Iran in History Archived 2007-04-29 at the Wayback Machine by Bernard Lewis.
  2. ^ Caheb C., Cambridge History of Iran, Tribes, Cities and Social Organization, vol. 4, p305–328
  3. Abdolhosein Zarrinkoub
    , et al. Section on The Arab Conquest of Iran and. Vol 4, 1975. London. p.46
  4. ^ a b c Fred Astren pg.33–35
  5. ^ a b c Tobin 113–115
  6. ^ E.J. Brill's first encyclopedia of Islam 1913–1936 By M. Th. Houtsma Page 100
  7. ^ a b The preaching of Islam: a history of the propagation of the Muslim faith By Sir Thomas Walker Arnold, pg.170–180
  8. ^ The preaching of Islam: a history of the propagation of the Muslim faith By Sir Thomas Walker Arnold, pg.125–258
  9. ^ Nasr, Hoseyn; Islam and the plight of modern man
  10. ^ Richard Frye, The Heritage of Persia, p. 243.
  11. ^ Rayhanat al- adab, (3rd ed.), vol. 1, p. 181.
  12. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica, "Seljuq", Online Edition, (LINK)
  13. ., p.47
  14. ^ Enderwitz, S. "Shu'ubiyya". Encyclopedia of Islam. Vol. IX (1997), pp. 513–14.
  15. ^ The History of Iran By Elton L. Daniel, pg. 74
  16. p. 66
  17. ^ Translated by F. Rosenthal (III, pp. 311–15, 271–4 [Arabic]; R.N. Frye (p.91)
  18. p. 29
  19. , p. 17.
  20. , 1973. p. 38
  21. p.153
  22. Abdolhosein Zarrinkoub
    , et al. Section on The Arab Conquest of Iran and its aftermath. Vol 4, 1975. London. p. 42

Further reading