Rashidun Caliphate
Rashidun Caliphate ٱلْخِلَافَةُ ٱلرَّاشِدَةُ ( Arabic) al-Khilāfah ar-Rāšidah | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
632–661 | |||||||||||||||
Status | Caliphate | ||||||||||||||
Capital | Medina (632–656) Kufa (656–661) | ||||||||||||||
Official languages | Classical Arabic[1] | ||||||||||||||
Common languages | Various regional languages[2] | ||||||||||||||
Religion | Islam | ||||||||||||||
Government | Caliphate | ||||||||||||||
Caliph | |||||||||||||||
• 632–634 | Abu Bakr (first) | ||||||||||||||
• 634–644 | Umar | ||||||||||||||
• 644–656 | Uthman | ||||||||||||||
• 656–661 | Ali (last) | ||||||||||||||
History | |||||||||||||||
632 | |||||||||||||||
633–654 | |||||||||||||||
• Ascension of Umar | 634 | ||||||||||||||
• Assassination of Umar and Ascension of Uthman | 644 | ||||||||||||||
• Assassination of Uthman and Ascension of Ali | 656 | ||||||||||||||
661 | |||||||||||||||
• First Fitna (internal conflict) ends after Hasan's abdication | 661 | ||||||||||||||
Area | |||||||||||||||
655[3] | 6,400,000 km2 (2,500,000 sq mi) | ||||||||||||||
Currency | |||||||||||||||
|
Caliphate خِلافة |
---|
Islam portal |
The Rashidun Caliphate (
The caliphate arose following Muhammad’s passing in June 632 and the subsequent debate over the succession to his leadership. Muhammad's close companion Abu Bakr, of the Banu Taym clan, was elected the first caliph in Medina and he began the conquest of the Arabian Peninsula. His brief reign ended in August 634 when he died and was succeeded by Umar, his appointed successor from the Banu Adi clan. Under Umar, the caliphate expanded at an unprecedented rate, ruling more than two-thirds of the Byzantine Empire and nearly the entire Sasanian Empire. Umar was assassinated in November 644 and was succeeded by Uthman, a member of the Banu Umayya clan, who was elected by a six-person committee arranged by Umar. Under Uthman, the caliphate concluded its conquest of Persia in 651 and continued expeditions into the Byzantine territories. Uthman's nepotistic policies earned him vehement opposition from some Muslim generals and he was eventually assassinated by rebels in June 656.
He was subsequently succeeded by
The Rashidun Caliphate is characterized by a twenty-five-year period of rapid
Etymology
The Arabic word After Origin
Notably, according to Sunnis, all four Rashidun Caliphs were connected to Muhammad through marriage, were early converts to Islam,
History
Abu Bakr's reign (632–634)
Accession to Caliphate
After Muhammad's death in June 632, a gathering of the Ansar (lit. 'Helpers'), the natives of Medina, took place in the Saqifah (courtyard) of the Banu Sa'ida clan. The general belief at the time was that the purpose of the meeting was for the Ansar to decide on a new leader of the Muslim community among themselves, with the intentional exclusion of the Muhajirun (migrants from Mecca), though this has later become the subject of debate.[20]
Nevertheless, Abu Bakr and Umar, both prominent companions of Muhammad, upon learning of the meeting became concerned about a potential coup and hastened to the gathering. Upon arriving, Abu Bakr addressed the assembled men with a warning that any attempt to elect a leader outside of Muhammad's own tribe, the
Abu Bakr was near-universally accepted as head of the Muslim community (under the title of Caliph) as a result of Saqifah, though he did face contention as a result of the rushed nature of the event. Several companions, most prominent among them being
Ridda wars
Troubles emerged soon after Muhammad's death, threatening the unity and stability of the new community and state.
Abu Bakr planned his strategy accordingly. He divided the Muslim army into several corps. The strongest corps, and the primary force of the Muslims, was the corps of
Expeditions to Persia and Syria
After Abu Bakr unified Arabia under Islam, he began the incursions into the
Umar's reign (634–644)
Before dying in August 634 from an illness, Abu Bakr appointed
While the caliphate continued its rapid expansion, Umar laid the foundations of a political structure that could hold it together. He created the Diwan, a bureau for transacting government affairs. The military was brought directly under state control and into its pay. Crucially, in conquered lands, Umar did not require that non-Muslim populations convert to Islam, nor did he try to centralize government. Instead, he allowed subject populations to retain their religion, language, and customs, and he left their government relatively untouched, imposing only a governor (amir) and a financial officer called an amil. These new posts were integral to the efficient network of taxation that financed the empire.
With the bounty secured from conquest, Umar was able to support its faith in material ways: the
While Umar was leading the morning prayers in 644, he was assassinated by the Persian slave
Uthman's reign (644–656)
Election of Uthman
Before Umar died, he appointed a committee of six men to decide on the next caliph and charged them with choosing one of their own numbers. All of the men, like Umar, were from the tribe of Quraysh.
The committee narrowed down the choices to two:
Uthman reigned for twelve years as a caliph. During the first half of his reign, he was the most popular caliph among all the Rashiduns, while in the latter half of his reign he met increasing opposition, led by the Egyptians and concentrated around Ali, who would albeit briefly, succeed Uthman as caliph.
Despite internal troubles, Uthman continued the wars of conquest started by Umar. The
Uthman's most lasting project was the final compilation of the Qur'an. Under his authority diacritics were written with Arabic letters so that non-native speakers of Arabic could easily read the Qur'an.
Assassination of Uthman
After a protest turned into a siege on his house, Uthman refused to initiate any military action, in order to avoid civil war between Muslims and preferred to negotiate a peaceful solution.[
Ali's reign (656–661)
Crisis and fragmentation
Following Uthman's assassination, Muhammad's cousin Ali (r. 656–661) was elected caliph by the rebels and townspeople of Medina.[41] He transferred the capital to Kufa, a garrison city in Iraq.[42] Soon thereafter, Ali dismissed several provincial governors, some of whom were relatives of Uthman, and replaced them with trusted aides, such as Malik al-Ashtar and Salman the Persian.
Demands to take revenge for the assassination of Caliph Uthman rose among parts of the population, and a large army of rebels led by
Thereafter, there rose another cry for revenge for the blood of Uthman, this time by
In 661, Ali was assassinated by
Ali's son Hasan briefly assumed the caliphate for six months and came to an agreement with Mu'awiya to fix relations between the two groups of Muslims that were each loyal to one of the two men. The treaty stated that Mu'awiya would not name a successor during his reign, and that he would let the Islamic world choose the next leader (this treaty would later be broken by Mu'awiya as he named his son Yazid I successor). Hasan was assassinated,[43] and Mu'awiya founded the Umayyad Caliphate, supplanting the Rashidun Caliphate.[35][36][page needed]
Military expansion
The Rashidun Caliphate expanded steadily; within the span of 24 years, a vast territory was conquered comprising Mesopotamia, the Levant, parts of Anatolia, and most of the Sasanian Empire.
Unlike the Sasanian Persians, the Byzantines, after losing Syria, retreated back to Anatolia. As a result, they also lost Egypt to the invading Rashidun army, although the civil wars among the Muslims halted the war of conquest for many years, and this gave time for the Byzantine Empire to recover.
Conquest of the Sasanian Empire
The first Islamic invasion of the Sasanian Empire, launched by Caliph Abu Bakr in 633, was a swift conquest, taking only four months. Abu Bakr sent his general, Khalid ibn al-Walid, to conquer
After resting his armies, Khalid moved in June 633 towards
In November 633, Khalid divided his army into three units, and attacked these auxiliaries one by one from three different sides at night, starting with the
Khalid then left Mesopotamia to lead another campaign in Syria against the Byzantine Empire, after which Mithna ibn Haris took command in Mesopotamia. The Persians once again concentrated armies to regain
Following this Battle, the Arab Muslim armies pushed forward toward the Persian capital of
Wars against the Byzantine Empire
Conquest of Byzantine Syria
After Khalid consolidated his control of Iraq, Abu Bakr sent four armies to Syria on the Byzantine front under four different commanders:
The border forts of
From Bosra, Khalid sent orders to the other corps commanders to join him at Ajnadayn, where, according to early Muslim historians, a Byzantine army of 90,000 (modern sources state 9,000)
On 22 August 634, Abu Bakr died, making Umar his successor. As Umar became caliph, he restored
The last large garrison of the Byzantine army was at Fahl, which was joined by survivors of Ajnadayn. With this threat at their rear, the Muslim armies could not move further north nor south. Thus Abu Ubaidah decided to deal with the situation, and defeated and routed this garrison at the
The prisoners taken in the battle informed them about Emperor Heraclius's plans to take back Syria. They said that an army possibly 200,000 strong would soon emerge to recapture the province. Khalid stopped here on June 636. As soon as Abu Ubaida heard the news of the advancing Byzantine army, he gathered all his officers to plan their next move. Khalid suggested that they should consolidate all of their forces present in the province of Syria (Syria, Jordan, Palestine) and then move towards the plain of Yarmouk for battle.
Abu Ubaida ordered the Muslim commanders to withdraw from all the conquered areas, return the tributes they had previously gathered, and move towards Yarmuk.
Nothing further happened until the third week of August, during which the
Khalid was recognized and eventually, Caliph Umar ibn Al Khattab came and
Khalid defeated a strong Byzantine army at the Battle of Hazir and reached Qasreen before Abu Ubaidah. The city surrendered to Khalid, and soon after, Abu Ubaidah arrived in June 637. Abu Ubaidah then moved against Aleppo, with Khalid, as usual, commanding the cavalry. After the Battle of Aleppo the city finally agreed to surrender in October 637.
Occupation of Anatolia
Abu Ubaidah and Khalid ibn al-Walid, after conquering all of northern Syria, moved north towards
The Taurus Mountains in Turkey marked the western frontiers of the Rashidun Caliphate in Anatolia during Caliph Uthman's reign.
Conquest of Egypt
In 639, Egypt was a prefecture of the Byzantine Empire. However, it had been occupied just a decade before by the Sasanian Empire under
The ease with which this valuable province was wrenched from the Byzantine Empire appears to have been due to the treachery of
In 645, during Uthman's reign, the Byzantines briefly regained Alexandria, but it was retaken by Amr in 646. In 654 an invasion fleet sent by
The Muslims were assisted by some Copts, who found the Muslims more tolerant than the Byzantines, and of these, some turned to Islam. In return for a tribute of money and food for the occupation troops, the Christian inhabitants of Egypt were excused from military service and left free in the observance of their religion and the administration of their affairs. Others sided with the Byzantines, hoping that they would provide a defense against the Arab invaders.[51] During the reign of Caliph Ali, Egypt was captured by rebel troops under the command of former Rashidun army general Amr ibn al-As, who killed Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr, the governor of Egypt appointed by Ali.
Conquest of the Maghreb
After the withdrawal of the Byzantines from Egypt, the
Uthman gave him permission after considering it in the Majlis al-Shura. A force of 10,000 soldiers was sent as reinforcement. The Rashidun army assembled in
Campaign against Nubia (Sudan)
A campaign was undertaken against
Conquest of the islands of the Mediterranean Sea
During Umar's reign, the governor of Syria,
Treatment of conquered peoples
The non-Muslim monotheists—Jews, Zoroastrians, and Christians—in conquered lands were called dhimmis (the protected people). Those who accepted Islam were treated in a similar manner to other Muslims and were given equivalent rights in legal matters. Non-Muslims were given legal rights according to their faiths' law except where it conflicted with Islamic law.
Dhimmis were allowed to "practice their religion, and to enjoy a measure of communal autonomy" and were guaranteed their personal safety and security of property, but only in return for paying tax and acknowledging Muslim rule.[53] Dhimmis were also required to pay the jizya.[54]
The Rashidun caliphs had placed special emphasis on relatively fair and just treatment of the dhimmis, which were also provided 'protection' by the Caliphate and were not expected to fight. Sometimes, particularly when there were not enough qualified Muslims, dhimmis were given important positions in the government.
Political administration
The basic administrative system of the Dar al-Islamiyyah (The House of Islam) was laid down in the days of Muhammad. Caliph Abu Bakr stated in his sermon when he was elected: "If I order any thing that would go against the order of Allah and his Messenger; then do not obey me". This is considered to be the foundation stone of the Caliphate. Caliph Umar has been reported to have said: "O Muslims, straighten me with your hands when I go wrong", and at that instance, a Muslim man stood up and said, "O Amir al-Mu'minin (Leader of the Believers) if you are not straightened by our hands we will use our sword to straighten you!". Hearing this Caliph Umar said "Alhamdulillah (Praise be to Allah) I have such followers."[citation needed]
Districts or provinces
Under Abu Bakr, the empire was not clearly divided into provinces, though it had many administrative districts.
Under Umar the Empire was divided into a number of provinces which were as follows:
- Arabia was divided into two provinces, Mecca and Medina.
- Iraq was divided into two provinces, Basra and Kufa.
- Jazira was divided into two provinces, the Tigris and the Euphrates.
- Syria was a province.
- Palestine was divided in two provinces: Aylya and Ramlah.
- Egypt was divided into two provinces: Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt.
- Fars.
In his
During Uthman's reign the caliphate was divided into twelve provinces. These were:
During Ali's reign, with the exception of Syria (which was under
The provinces were further divided into
- Katib, the Chief Secretary.
- Katib-ud-Diwan, the Military Secretary.
- Sahib-ul-Kharaj, the Revenue Collector.
- Sahib-ul-Ahdath, the Police Chief.
- Sahib-ul-Bait-ul-Mal, the Treasury Officer.
- Qadi, the Chief Judge.
In some districts there were separate military officers, though the governor was in most cases the commander-in-chief of the army quartered in the province.
The officers were appointed by the Caliph. Every appointment was made in writing. At the time of appointment, an instrument of instructions was issued to regulate the conduct of the governors. On assuming office, the Governor was required to assemble the people in the main mosque, and read the instrument of instructions before them.[55]
Umar's general instructions to his officers were:
Remember, I have not appointed you as commanders and tyrants over the people. I have sent you as leaders instead, so that the people may follow your example. Give the Muslims their rights and do not beat them lest they become abused. Do not praise them unduly, lest they fall into the error of conceit. Do not keep your doors shut in their faces, lest the more powerful of them eat up the weaker ones. And do not behave as if you were superior to them, for that is tyranny over them.
During the reign of Abu Bakr the state was economically weak, while during Umar's reign because of an increase in revenues and other sources of income, the state was on its way to economic prosperity. Hence Umar felt it necessary to treat the officers strictly, in order to prevent corruption. During his reign, at the time of appointment, every officer was required to swear an oath:
- That he would not ride a Turkic horse (which was a symbol of pride).
- That he would not wear fine clothes.
- That he would not eat sifted flour.
- That he would not keep a porter at his door.
- That he would always keep his door open to the public.
Caliph Umar himself followed the above postulates strictly. During the reign of
At the time of an officer's appointment, a complete inventory of all his possessions was prepared and kept on record. If there was later an unusual increase in his possessions, he was immediately called to account, and the unlawful property confiscated by the State. The principal officers were required to come to Mecca on the occasion of the Hajj, during which people were free to present any complaint against them. In order to minimize the chances of corruption, Umar made it a point to pay high salaries to the staff. Provincial governors received as much as five to seven thousand dirhams annually besides their share of the spoils of war (if they were also the commander-in-chief of the army of their sector).
Judicial administration
The judicial administration, like the rest of the administrative structure of the Rashidun Caliphate, was set up by Umar, and it remained basically unchanged throughout the duration of the Caliphate. In order to provide adequate and speedy justice for the people, justice was administered according to the
Accordingly, Qadis (judges) were appointed at all administrative levels. The Qadis were chosen for their integrity and learning in Islamic law. Wealthy men and men of high social status, compensated highly by the Caliphate, were appointed in order to make them resistant to bribery or undue influence based on social position. The Qadis also were not allowed to engage in trade. Judges were appointed in sufficient numbers to staff every district with at least one.
Electing or appointing a caliph
The four
Fred Donner, in his book The Early Islamic Conquests (1981), argues that the standard Arabian practice during the early Caliphates was for the prominent men of a kinship group, or tribe, to gather after a leader's death and elect a leader from amongst themselves, although there was no specified procedure for this shura, or consultative assembly. Candidates were usually from the same lineage as the deceased leader, but they were not necessarily his sons. Capable men who would lead well were preferred over an ineffectual direct heir, as there was no basis in the majority Sunni view that the head of state or governor should be chosen based on lineage alone.
Sunni belief
Following the death of Muhammad, a meeting took place at
Accountability of rulers
Sunni Islamic lawyers have commented on when it is permissible to disobey, impeach or remove rulers in the Caliphate. This is usually when the rulers are not meeting public responsibilities obliged upon them under Islam.
Al-Mawardi said that if the rulers meet their Islamic responsibilities to the public, the people must obey their laws, but if they become either unjust or severely ineffective then the Caliph or ruler must be impeached via the Majlis al-Shura.
And they (the sinners on qiyama) will say, "Our Lord! We obeyed our leaders and our chiefs, and they misled us from the right path. Our Lord! Give them (the leaders) double the punishment you give us and curse them with a very great curse"...[33:67–68]
Islamic lawyers have commented that when the rulers refuse to step down via successful impeachment through the Majlis, becoming dictators through the support of a corrupt army, the majority, upon agreement, has the option to launch a revolution against them. Many noted that this option is only exercised after factoring in the potential cost of life.[57]
Rule of law
The following hadith establishes the principle of rule of law in relation to nepotism and accountability:[58]
Narrated ‘
Fatima, the daughter of Muhammad (my daughter) stole, I would cut off her hand."
Various Islamic lawyers do, however, place multiple conditions, and stipulations—e.g., the poor cannot be penalised for stealing out of poverty—before executing such a law, making it very difficult to reach such a stage. It is well known that, during a time of drought during the Rashidun caliphate, capital punishments were suspended until the effects of the drought passed.[59]
According to Noah Feldman, a law professor at Harvard University, the legal scholars and jurists who once upheld the rule of law were replaced by a law governed by the state due to the codification of Sharia by the Ottoman Empire in the early 19th century.[61]
Economy
Bait-ul-Maal
Bait-ul-Maal (lit., the house of money) was the department that dealt with the revenues and all other economic matters of the state. In the time of Muhammad, there was no permanent Bait-ul-Mal or public treasury. Whatever revenues or other amounts were received were distributed immediately. There were no salaries to be paid, and there was no state expenditure, thereby making a public treasury unnecessary.
Abu Bakr (632–634) established a house where all money was kept on receipt. As all money was distributed immediately, the treasury generally remained locked up; at the time of Abu Bakr's death, there was only one dirham in the public treasury.
Establishment of Bait-ul-Maal
In the time of Umar, things changed. With each conquest, revenue increased. Umar also granted salaries to the army.
After consulting the Companions, Umar decided to establish the central Treasury at Medina. Abdullah bin Arqam was appointed as the Treasury Officer. He was assisted by
A separate building was constructed for the royal treasury, the bait ul maal, which, in large cities, was protected by as many as 400 guards.
Most historical accounts state that, among the Rashidun caliphs, Uthman was the first to strike coins; some accounts, however, state that Umar was the first to do so. When Persia was conquered, three types of coins were current there: the Baghli, of eight dang; Tabari of four dang; and Maghribi of three dang. Umar (or Uthman, according to some accounts) first struck an Islamic dirham of six dang.
Economic resources of the State
The economic resources of the State were:
- Zakāt
- Ushr
- Jizya
- Fay
- Khums
- Kharaj
Zakat
Zakāt (زكاة) is the Islamic equivalent of a luxury tax. It was taken from the Muslims in the amount of 2.5% of their dormant wealth (viz., that over a certain amount unused for a year) to give to the poor. All and only those persons whose annual wealth exceeded a minimum level (nisab) were collected from. The nisab did not include one's primary residence, primary transportation, a moderate amount of woven jewelry, etc. Zakāt is one of the Five Pillars of Islam.
Jizya
Jizya or jizyah (جزْية;
Fay
Fay was the income from State land, whether an agricultural land or a meadow or land with any natural mineral reserves.
Khums
Ghanimah or Khums represented war booty, four-fifths of which was distributed among serving soldiers, while one-fifth was allotted to the state.
Kharaj
Kharaj was a tax on agricultural land.
Initially, after the first Muslim conquests in the seventh century, kharaj usually denoted a lump-sum duty levied upon the conquered provinces and collected by the officials of the former Byzantine and Sasanian empires, or, more broadly, any kind of tax levied by Muslim conquerors on their non-Muslim subjects,
Ushr
Ushr was a reciprocal 10% levy on agricultural land as well as merchandise imported from states that taxed the Muslims on their products. Umar was the first Muslim ruler to levy ushr. Umar issued instructions that ushr should be levied in such a way so as to avoid hardship, so as not to affect trade within the Caliphate. The tax was levied only on merchandise meant for sale; goods imported for consumption or personal use but not for sale were not taxed. Merchandise valued at 200 dirhams or less was not taxed. Imports by citizens for trade purposes were subject to the customs duty or import tax at lower rates. In the case of the dhimmis, the rate was 5% and, in the case of the Muslims, 2.5%, the same as that of zakāt. The levy was thus regarded as a part of zakāt rather than a separate tax.
Allowance
Beginning of the allowance
After the Battle of the Yarmuk and Battle of al-Qadisiyyah the Muslims won heavy spoils, filling the coffers at Medina. The problem before Umar was what to do with this money. Someone suggested that the money should be kept in the treasury as a reserve for public expenditures. However, this view was not acceptable to the general body of Muslims. Accordingly, a consensus was reached to distribute whatever was received during a year to the citizens.
The next question was what system should be adopted for distribution. One suggestion was to distribute it equally on an ad hoc basis. Others objected that, as the spoils were considerable, the proposal would make the people very rich. It was therefore agreed that, instead of ad hoc division, the amount of the allowance to the stipend should be determined beforehand and this allowance should be paid regardless of the amount of the spoils.
On the amount of the allowance there were two opinions. Some held that it should be the same for all Muslims. Umar, on the other hand, believed that the allowance should be graduated according to one's merit with reference to Islam.
Then the question arose as to what basis should be used for placing some above others. Some suggested that the Caliph should first get the highest allowance, with the remaining allowances graduating downward from that. Umar rejected the proposal and decided to start with the clan of Muhammad.
Umar set up a committee to compile a list of persons by nearness to Muhammad. The committee produced the list clan-wise. Bani Hashim appeared as the first clan, then the clan of Abu Bakr, and then the clan of Umar. Umar accepted the first two placements but relegated his clan lower on the relationship scale.
The main provisions of the final scale of allowance approved by Umar were:[citation needed]
- The widows of Muhammadreceived 12,000 dirhams each;
- `Abbas ibn `Abd al-Muttalib, the uncle of Muhammad, received an annual allowance of 7,000 dirhams;
- The grandsons of Muhammad, Hasan ibn Ali and Husayn ibn Ali received 5,000 dirhams each;
- The veterans of the Battle of Badr got an allowance of 6,000 dirhams each;
- Those who had become Muslims by the time of the Treaty of Hudaybiyyahgot 4,000 dirhams each;
- Those who became Muslims at the time of the Conquest of Mecca received 3,000 dirhams each;
- The veterans of the Apostasy wars received 3,000 dirhams each.
- The veterans of the Battle of Yarmouk and the Battle of al-Qadisiyyahreceived 2,000 dirhams each.
Under this scale, Umar's son
Evaluation
The evaluation greatly contributed to the prosperity of the citizens as trade increased, and their contributions to the bait al maal increased accordingly.
Public works
The mosques were not merely places for offering prayers, but also community centers where the faithful gathered to discuss problems of social and cultural importance. During the caliphate of Umar, as many as four thousand mosques were constructed extending from Persia in the east to Egypt in the west. Al-
During the caliphate of Umar, many new cities were founded. These included
Many buildings were built for administrative purposes. In the Dar-ul-Amarat quarters, government offices and residences for officers were sited. Diwans were constructed to house official records. Bait-ul-Mal was used to house royal treasuries.
Military cantonments were constructed at strategic points. Special stables were provided for cavalry, which could accommodate as many as 4,000 horses. Special pasture grounds were provided and maintained for Bait-ul-Mal animals.
Assessment and legacy
Some secular scholars have questioned the traditional
Hoyland also questions the alleged moral superiority of the Rashidun (or at least of Uthman and Ali) to their Umayyad successors, noting Ali was involved in the first civil war (First Fitna) and Uthman had "already inaugurated a nepotistic style of government",[70] for which later Caliphs were condemned, and wonders if the idea of a divinely guided "golden age" of early Islam came from a need by late Umayyad and Abbasid religious scholars to differentiate the first caliphs (who had more power in law making) and the contemporary Caliphs who they wanted to defer to them (the ulama) in religious matters. Consequently, the companions were "given a makeover" as "model's of piety and beyond reproach".[71]
This is in-line with
The stark differences in these two views has led to sectarian tension that has even culminated in violence.
Military
The Rashidun Military was the primary arm of the Islamic armed forces of the seventh century, serving alongside the Rashidun navy. The army maintained a very high level of discipline, strategic prowess, and organization, along with the motivation and initiative of the officer corps. For much of its history, this army was one of the most powerful and effective military forces throughout the region. At the height of the Rashidun Caliphate, the maximum size of the army was around 100,000 troops.[73]
Rashidun army
The Rashidun army was divided into infantry and light cavalry. Reconstructing the military equipment of early Muslim armies is problematic. Compared with Roman armies or later medieval Muslim armies, the range of visual representation is very small, often imprecise. Physically, very little material evidence has survived, and much of it is difficult to date.[74] The soldiers wore iron and bronze segmented helmets from Iraq, of Central Asian type.[75]
The standard form of body armor was
The basic strategy of early Muslim armies on the campaign was to exploit every possible weakness of the enemy. Their key strength was mobility. The cavalry had both horses and camels, the latter used as both transport and food for long marches through the desert (e.g., Khalid ibn al-Walid's extraordinary march from the Persian border to Damascus). The cavalry was the army's main strike force and also served as a strategic mobile reserve. The common tactic was to use the infantry and archers to engage and maintain contact with the enemy while the cavalry was held back till the enemy was fully engaged. Once fully engaged, the enemy reserves were held by the infantry and archers, while the cavalry executed a pincer movement (like modern tank and mechanized divisions) to attack the enemy from the sides or to assault their base camps.[citation needed]
The Rashidun army was, in quality and strength, below the standard set by the Sasanian and Byzantine armies. Khalid ibn al-Walid was the first general of the Rashidun Caliphate to successfully conquer foreign lands. During his campaign against the Sasanian Empire (Iraq, 633–634) and the Byzantine Empire (Syria, 634–638), Khalid developed brilliant tactics that he used effectively against both enemy armies.[citation needed]
Abu Bakr's strategy was to give his generals their mission, the geographical area in which that mission would be carried out, and resources for that purpose. He would then leave it to his generals to accomplish their missions in whatever manner they chose. On the other hand, Umar, in the latter part of his Caliphate, adopted a more hands-on approach, directing his generals where to stay and when to move to the next target and who was to command the left and right-wing of the army in each particular battle. This made conquests comparatively slower but made the campaigns well-organized. Uthman and Ali reverted to Abu Bakr's method, giving missions to their generals and leaving the details to them.[citation needed]
The early caliphate naval conquest managed to mark long time legacy of Islamic maritime enterprises from the Conquest of Cyprus, the famous Battle of the Masts[77] up to of their successor states such as the area Transoxiana from area located in between the Jihun River(Oxus/Amu Darya) and Syr Darya, to Sindh (present day Pakistan), by Umayyad,[78] naval cove of privateer in La Garde-Freinet by Cordoban Emirate,[79] and the Sack of Rome by the Aghlabids in later era[80][81][82]
List of Rashidun caliphs
Period | Caliph | Calligraphic | Relationship with Muhammad | Parents | House | Notable events |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 June 632 – 22 August 634 | Abu Bakr (أبو بكر) Al-Siddiq |
|
|
Banu Taym |
| |
23 August 634 – 3 November 644 | Umar (عمر) Al-Faruq |
|
Banu Adi | |||
11 November 644 – 20 June 656 | Uthman (عثمان) Al-Ghani |
|
Banu Umayya | |||
20 June 656 – 29 January 661 | Ali (علي) |
|
Banu Hashim |
|
See also
Historical Arab states and dynasties |
---|
- The Four Companions
- Islamic Golden Age
- Talut
- The ten to whom Paradise was promised
- Timeline of Medina
References
- ISBN 978-90-04-14473-6.
- ISBN 978-0-7486-4529-9.
- JSTOR 2600793.
- ISBN 9781317423683.
- .
- ^ Melchert 2020, pp. 63, 72, note 1.
- ^ Sowerwine 2010, p. 5.
- ^ McHugo 2017, p. 93.
- ISBN 9789799988812.
- ISBN 9780334040323.
- ISBN 9781412994224.
- ISBN 9780761421207.
- ^ Catharina Raudvere, Islam: An Introduction (I.B.Tauris, 2015), 51–54.
- ^ Asma Afsaruddin (2008). The first Muslims: history and memory. Oneworld. p. 55.
- ISBN 9788173913358.
- ISBN 9781134081066.
He also foretold that there would be a caliphate for thirty years (the length of the Rashidun Caliphate) that would be followed by kingship.
- ^ Hamilton Alexander Rosskeen Gibb; Johannes Hendrik Kramers; Bernard Lewis; Charles Pellat; Joseph Schacht (1970). "The Encyclopaedia of Islam". The Encyclopaedia of Islam. 3 (Parts 57–58). Brill: 1164.
- ^ Aqidah.Com (1 December 2009). "The Khilaafah Lasted for 30 Years Then There Was Kingship Which Allaah Gives To Whomever He Pleases". Aqidah.Com. Retrieved 16 August 2014.
- ^ Rane 2010, p. 83.
- ^ Madelung 1997, p. 31.
- ^ Madelung (1997, p. 32)
- ^ Coeli Fitzpatrick, Adam Hani Walker Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God (2014), p. 3 [1]
- ^ Valerie J. Hoffman, The Essentials of Ibadi Islam (2012), p. 6
- ^ Madelung (1997, pp. 32–33)
- ^ Fitzpatrick & Walker (2014, p. 186)
- ^ Fitzpatrick & Walker (2014, p. 4)
- ^ Balazuri: p. 113.
- ^ Tabari: Vol. 2, p. 467.
- ^ a b c d Gianluca Paolo Parolin, Citizenship in the Arab World: Kin, Religion and Nation-state (Amsterdam University Press, 2009), 52.
- ^ Tabari: Vol. 2, p. 518
- ^ a b The Arab Conquest of Iran and its Aftermath, 'Abd Al-Husein Zarrinkub, The Cambridge History of Iran, Volume 4, ed. William Bayne Fisher, Richard Nelson Frye (Cambridge University Press, 1999), 5–6.
- ^ Battle of Yarmouk River, Spencer Tucker, Battles That Changed History: An Encyclopedia of World Conflict (ABC-CLIO, 2010), 92.
- ^ Khalid ibn Walid, Timothy May, Ground Warfare: An International Encyclopedia, Vol. 1, ed. Stanley Sandler (ABC-CLIO, 2002), 458.
- ^ Madelung 1997, p. 49.
- ^ a b c d e f شبارو, عصام محمد (1995). First Islamic Arab State (1–41 AH/ 623–661 CE). 3. Arab Renaissance House – Beirut, Lebanon. p. 370.
- ^ a b c Madelung 1997.
- ISBN 978-0-231-52165-9.
- ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6
- ISBN 978-0-07-244233-5.
- ^ Hinds 1972, p. 457.
- ^ Donner 2010, pp. 157–159.
- ^ Netton 2013, p. 358.
- Encyclopedia Iranica Foundation. Archived from the originalon 17 November 2013.
- ^ A. I. Alkram. "Chapter 19: The Battle of Chains – Chapter 26: The Last Opposition". Khalid bin Al-Waleed: His Life and Campaigns. The Sword of Allah. p. 1.
- "Chapter 19: The Battle of Chains". p. 1. Archived from the original on 26 January 2002.
- "Chapter 20: The Battle of the River". p. 1. Archived from the original on 6 March 2002. Retrieved 21 August 2007.
- "Chapter 21: The Hell of Walaja". p. 1. Archived from the original on 6 March 2002. Retrieved 21 August 2007.
- "Chapter 22: The River of Blood". p. 1. Archived from the original on 22 August 2002. Retrieved 21 August 2007.
- "Chapter 23: The Conquest of Hira". p. 1. Archived from the original on 6 March 2002. Retrieved 21 August 2007.
- "Chapter 24: Anbar and Ain-ut-Tamr". p. 1. Archived from the original on 6 March 2002. Retrieved 21 August 2007.
- "Chapter 25: Daumat-ul-Jandal Again". p. 1. Archived from the original on 6 March 2002. Retrieved 21 August 2007.
- "Chapter 26: The Last Opposition". p. 1. Archived from the original on 6 March 2002. Retrieved 21 August 2007.
- ^ D. Nicolle, Yarmuk 636 AD – The Muslim Conquest of Syria, p. 43: gives 9,000–10,000
- ^ a b A.I. Akram. "Chapter 31: The Unkind Cut". The Sword of Allah: Khalid bin Al-Waleed: His Life and Campaigns. p. 1. Archived from the original on 5 January 2003. Retrieved 16 July 2010.
- ^ "Chapter 32: The Battle of Fahl". Khalid bin Al-Waleed: His Life and Campaigns. The Sword of Allah. p. 1. Archived from the original on 10 January 2003. Retrieved 16 July 2010.
- ^ "The Eve of Yarmuk". Khalid bin Al-Waleed. Archived from the original on 2 April 2007.
- ^ "The Conquest of Emessa". Khalid bin Al-Waleed. Archived from the original on 6 March 2007.
- ^ "Catholic Encyclopedia: Cyrus of Alexandria". New Advent. Archived from the original on 24 March 2011.
- ^ "John, Bishop of Nikiu: Chronicle. London (1916). English Translation". www.tertullian.org. Archived from the original on 9 January 2011.
- ^ Nadvi (2000), p. 522[full citation needed]
- ISBN 978-0-691-00807-3.
- Encyclopedia of Islam– Jizya
- ^ The Cambridge History of Islam, ed. P.M. Holt, Ann K.S. Lambton, and Bernard Lewis, Cambridge 1970
- ^ Bosworth, Marín & Ayalon 1960–2007.
- ^ a b "The Muslims Internet Directory: e Process of Choosing the Leader (Caliph) of the Muslims: The Muslim Khilafa". www.2muslims.com. Archived from the original on 7 July 2011.
- ^ Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 56, Number 681
- ISBN 9781847064783.
- ^ (Weeramantry 1997, pp. 132 & 135)
- ^ Noah Feldman (16 March 2008). "Why Shariah?". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 October 2008.
- ^ As the Arabs of the Ḥejāz had used the drahms of the Sasanian-style, the only silver coinage in the world at that time, it was natural for them to leave many of the Sasanian mints in operation, striking coins like those of the emperors in every detail except for the addition of brief Arabic inscriptions like besmellāh in the margins.https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/coins-and-coinage-
- ISBN 978-0-7486-2194-1
- ^ Shadi Hamid (August 2003), "An Islamic Alternative? Equality, Redistributive Justice, and the Welfare State in the Caliphate of Umar", Renaissance: Monthly Islamic Journal, 13 (8) (see online) Archived August 25, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Shahid Alam, Articulating Group Differences: A Variety of Autocentrisms, Journal of Science and Society, 2003
- ^ a b Ali (1990), p. 507
- ^ Lewis (2002), p. 72
- ^ Hoyland, In God's Path, 2015: p. 98
- ^ Ghabban, A.I.I., Translation and concluding remarks by and Hoyland, R., 2008. The inscription of Zuhayr, the oldest Islamic inscription (24 AH/AD 644–645), the rise of the Arabic script and the nature of the early Islamic state 1. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy, 19(2), pp. 210–237.
- ^ Hoyland, In God's Path, 2015: p. 134
- ^ Hoyland, In God's Path, 2015: p. 227
- ^ Zaman, M.Q., 1998. Sectarianism in Pakistan: The radicalization of Shi‘i and Sunni identities. Modern Asian Studies, 32(3), p. 691.
- ^ Fratini, Dan (1 April 2006). "The Battle Of Yarmuk, 636". Military History Online. Archived from the original on 16 May 2011. Retrieved 29 November 2014.
- ^ a b Hugh Kennedy (2001). "Chapter Seven: Weapons and equipment in early Muslim armies". The Armies of the Caliphs: Military and Society in the Early Islamic State. London: Routledge. p. 168. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
- ^ Kennedy, Hugh (2001). "Chapter Eight: Fortification and siege warfare". The Armies of the Caliphs: Military and Society in the Early Islamic State. London: Routledge. p. 183. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
- ^ Augus Mcbride
- ^ Bosworth 1996, pp. 157–158.
- ^ Frastuti 2020, p. 122.
- ^ Fromherz, Allen. "Islam and the Sea". Oxford Islamic studies. Oxford. Archived from the original on 27 January 2014. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
- ^ Vasiliev 1935, p. 131-207.
- ^ Treadgold 1988, pp. 285–286.
- ^ Abun-Nasr 1987, pp. 55–58.
- ^ Madelung 1997, pp. 68–69.
- ^ Madelung 1997, p. 139.
- ^ Madelung 1997, p. 308.
Sources
- Abun-Nasr, Jamil M. (1987), A History of the Maghrib in the Islamic Period, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-33767-4
- Bosworth, C. Edmund (July 1996). "Arab Attacks on Rhodes in the Pre-Ottoman Period". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. 6 (2): 157–164. S2CID 163550092.
- ISBN 9781889758879.
- ISBN 9780674050976.
- Fitzpatrick, Coeli; Walker, Adam Hani (25 April 2014). Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God [2 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-61069-178-9– via Google Books.
- Frastuti, Melia (2020). "Reformasi Sistem Administrasi Pemerintahan, Penakhlukkan di Darat Dan Dilautan Pada Era Bani Umayyah". Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah (in Malay). 6 (2): 119–127. S2CID 234578454.
- S2CID 159763369.)
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link - Hoyland, Robert G. (2015). In God's Path: the Arab Conquests and the Creation of an Islamic Empire. Oxford University Press.
- Madelung, Wilferd (1997). The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate. Cambridge, England: ISBN 0521646960.
- McHugo, John (2017). A Concise History of Sunnis & Shi'is. Georgetown University Press. ISBN 978-1-62-616587-8.
- Netton, Ian Richard (19 December 2013). Encyclopaedia of Islam. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-17960-1.
- Sowerwine, James E. (2010). Caliph and Caliphate. Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199806003.
- Rane, Halim (2010). Islam and Contemporary Civilisation. Academic Monographs. ISBN 9780522857283.
- ISBN 978-0-8047-1462-4.
- OCLC 181731396.
- Weeramantry, Judge Christopher G. (1997). Justice Without Frontiers: Furthering Human Rights. ISBN 90-411-0241-8.
- ISBN 978-1-83860-765-4.