Lonicera maackii

Lonicera maackii
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Plantae
Clade:	Tracheophytes
Clade:	Angiosperms
Clade:	Eudicots
Clade:	Asterids
Order:	Dipsacales
Family:	Caprifoliaceae
Genus:	Lonicera
Species:	L. maackii
Binomial name
Lonicera maackii ( Maxim.
Synonyms[1]
Xylosteon maackii Rupr.

Lonicera maackii, the Amur honeysuckle, is a species of

Lonicera maackii is a listed endangered species in Japan.^[3][4] It has escaped from cultivation and naturalized in New Zealand and the eastern United States; in the woodlands of the U.S. it is a significant invasive species.^[5]

Description

The plant is a large,

.

The flowers are produced in pairs; they are 2 centimetres (3⁄4 in) long, have two lips, begin white and later turn yellow or pale orange in color; they bloom from middle of spring to early summer. The fruit is a bright red to black, semi-translucent berry, 2–6 millimetres (5⁄64–15⁄64 in) in diameter, that contains numerous small seeds.

Etymology and authority

The species name "maackii" is derived from

.

Some Internet sources name the species authority as "(Rupr.) Herder", but the correct authority is "(Rupr.) Maxim".^[2]

Cultivation

Amur honeysuckle is cultivated as an

The plant is adaptable and flourishes in a wide range of conditions. In the United States, it was planted to control erosion and to form hedges. It readily self-propagates via birds dispersing its seeds, and quickly spreads into habitats for which it has no community connectivity.^{[5][8][9][10][6]}

It grows rapidly and prefers shady habitats such as woodland understories, neglected urban areas, and fence rows. It can form very dense thickets.^[7][8][11]

The flowers are sometimes savored by children, who remove blossoms and pull off their bottoms so as to suck out the sweet nectar in the centers. The berries, on the other hand, are mildly poisonous to humans and therefore should not be consumed.

Alternatives

Because of the invasive nature of this species, regardless of whether it is banned locally, it is imprudent to cultivate Amur honeysuckle in climates similar to those where the species has invaded, e.g. eastern North America.^[9]

Possible alternative shrubs that are also fast growing, shade tolerant, and deciduous, but not invasive in eastern US include:^[6]

More native shrubs for use the Midwestern United States are listed in the pamphlet Curse of the Bush Honeysuckles!.^[12]

Phytochemistry

L. maackii produces various

Invasive nature and remedies

Birds and mammals consume and disperse seeds. Biotic transmission vectors include species:

Because of its well-documented invasiveness, propagation of this plant is illegal or controlled in some of the United States, where it is an alien species.[5]^{[8][9][10][6]} The species is named "invasive, banned" in Connecticut, "prohibited" in Massachusetts, as an invasive species in Tennessee, as an invasive species in Ohio, as a "Class B noxious weed" in Vermont, and as an invasive species in Wisconsin.^[16]

It has been suggested that plants growing outside their native range, in eastern Asia, should be removed and replaced by non-invasive alternatives.^[6]

Consequences

In the understories of deciduous woodlands of the eastern United States it forms dense thickets, the shade of whose canopies prevent the growth of native shrubs, juvenile trees, and wild flowers.^{[5][8][9][10][6]} Uncontrolled, these growths result in almost monocultural thickets of Amur honeysuckle.^{[5][8][9][10][6]} The species gravely jeopardizes not only the diversity of the invaded ecosystems but even the regeneration of woodlands,^{[5][8][9][10][6]} because it reduces the growth and diversity of native seedlings.^[17] Additional studies indicate that it negatively affects birds^[18] and tadpoles.^[19] However, other studies have shown a mixture of positive and negative effects on birds, depending on species (McNeish and McEwan, 2016).^[20] Effects on invertebrate diversity can also be negative or positive, depending on the taxonomic group (Loomis and Cameron, 2014).^[21]

Even if L. maackii shrubs are removed, the affected habitat may not recover absent substantial restoration effort.^[22]

The relationship between white-tailed deer and L. maackii is complex, with deer playing a significant role in consuming the berries, dispersing the seeds, and browsing the foliage; the presence of L. maackii may prevent deer from browsing understory vegetation, which can be desirable if a native understory is present, but undesirable if other invasive species dominate the understory.

Control and eradication

The species is controlled by cutting, flaming, or burning the plant to the level of its roots and repetition of this in two-week increments until the nutrient reserves in the roots are depleted and unable to produce any new growths. To ensure eradication,

It can also be controlled by annual applications of glyphosate that thoroughly saturate the foliage, or by grubbing the shallowly rooted juvenile plants, but these two methods increase labor cost and disrupt the soil. Uprooting by hand or with tools can be effective for small individuals, though it becomes difficult or impractical for larger ones.^[24]

This species has been found to be a host for the leaf-mining moth Phyllonorycter emberizaepenella in North America.^[25] In its native range, Lonicera maackii is a host plant for the following butterflies: Limenitis camilla, Limenitis helmanni, and Limenitis amphyssa.^[26]

References

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Lonicera maackii.