Nevada-class battleship
Nevada (right) and Oklahoma (left) steaming in the Atlantic in the 1920s
| |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Name | Nevada-class battleship |
Builders | |
Operators | United States Navy |
Preceded by | New York class |
Succeeded by | Pennsylvania class |
Built | 1912–1916 |
In commission | 1916–1946 |
Completed | 2 |
Lost | 1 |
Retired | 1 |
General characteristics (Original configuration) | |
Type | Dreadnought battleship |
Displacement |
|
Length |
|
Beam | 95 ft 2.5 in (29.0 m) |
Draft | Normal: 28 ft 6 in (8.7 m) |
Installed power |
|
Propulsion |
|
Speed | 20.5 knots (38 km/h; 24 mph) |
Range | 8,000 nmi (9,206 mi; 14,816 km) at 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph) |
Complement |
|
Armament |
|
Armor |
|
General characteristics (After 1927–1930 refit) | |
Displacement |
|
Installed power |
|
Range | 15,700 nmi (29,100 km; 18,100 mi) at 10 knots |
Complement | 1,374 |
Armament |
|
General characteristics (Nevada after 1942 refit) | |
Sensors and processing systems | SC air search radar |
Armament |
|
The Nevada class comprised two
Nevada and Oklahoma deployed to Ireland in 1918 to escort convoys during World War I but saw no action. After the war, they were transferred to the Pacific Fleet, where they spent most of the 1920s and 1930s. During this period, they conducted extensive training operations and made several long-distance cruises, including to Australia and New Zealand in 1925 and Oklahoma's voyage to Europe in 1936. Both vessels were extensively modernized between 1927 and 1930, having their armament improved, protection scheme strengthened, and new boilers installed. They were moored in Battleship Row in Pearl Harbor when the Japanese attacked on 7 December 1941; Oklahoma was sunk in the attack while Nevada was able to get underway before being forced to ground herself to avoid sinking in deeper water.
Only Nevada was salvageable, and she was repaired and modernized by mid-1943 when she joined the
Development
The design of the Nevada class took place in the context of strong political opposition to the continual growth (and thus increases in cost) of battleship building that had accelerated with the development of the
Initial design
The General Board was not satisfied with the adoption of 5 and 6 twin-
By this time, the Navy had come to the conclusion that naval engagements would be fought at very long range, and primarily with
In June, the Board sent a set of requirements to C&R that incorporated the twelve-gun battery already projected, a minimum speed of 21 knots (39 km/h; 24 mph), and an armor layout based on the "all or nothing" concept. The engineers at C&R noted that the armor deck would considerably strengthen the hull, but pointed out that the 11-inch belt of the original design would be wholly insufficient to defeat the latest main guns in foreign navies. The Board suggested the addition of a 1.5 in (38 mm) splinter bulkhead behind the belt, which would contain shell fragments. In late 1910, before a final design was accepted, the Navy had to submit estimates for FY1912 to be voted on by Congress in 1911; they used figures based on the New Yorks, which were accepted by Congress, and in turn limited the size of the new ships to a displacement of around 27,000 long tons (27,000 t); this was too low for C&R's existing proposals, necessitating a redesign. By this time, the first generation of American dreadnoughts had begun to enter service, so experiences operating them could be incorporated into the redesign.[7]
Redesign and approval
The first major change was the arrangement of the aft pair of turrets. The amidships magazine of the battleship
C&R submitted its next proposal on 13 February 1911; it generally aligned with the Board's ideas for the armor layout, but it retained some medium armor to protect the secondary guns and it incorporated triple-expansion machinery (though they noted that the engine rooms could accommodate Curtis turbines). The Board rejected it, leading the designers to remove the medium armor, producing a series of studies with speeds of 20 knots (37 km/h; 23 mph), 20.5 knots (38 km/h; 24 mph), and 21 knots and main batteries that ranged from eight to twelve guns. During this period, on 4 March, Congress authorized a pair of ships, designated BB-36 and BB-37 for FY1912. With the ships now authorized, the Board selected one of the ten-gun, 20.5-knot variations on 30 March, which had a belt that was increased to 14 in but included a series of tapers at the top and bottom edge to save weight. The Bureau of Ordnance pointed out that the belt could not be manufactured in a single strake with the tapers, so a joint between upper and lower strakes—a design weakness the engineers had been attempting to avoid—would have to be used. The problem was resolved in July, when C&R proposed removing the 1.5-inch splinter bulkhead in favor of increasing the belt to 13.5 in (343 mm) and incorporating only one taper at the lower edge.[9]
The next issue to address was the triple turret that was the linchpin of the design, since the weight savings made the heavier belt possible and it corrected design defects present in the earlier 5- and 6-turret classes. The US Navy had never built a three-gun turret, and there were concerns that a single hit could disable all three guns, and that three holes in the turret face would weaken the armor too much. C&R suggested conducting firing trials with the old battleship Indiana, but nothing came of the proposal. Daniels approved the finalized Nevada design on 31 March, without a completed turret design, which was a significant gamble because the turret design might not have been successful. An experimental turret was completed in August 1912, proving the concept, though it required some modifications to reduce shell interference. Since the finalized design adopted a ten-gun battery, only two of the four turrets would be triple mounts, one forward and one aft, with twin-gun turrets superfiring over them.[10]
With the design nearly finalized, the Board began to circulate it with fleet officers for comment; Captain
Design
General characteristics and machinery
The ships of the Nevada class were 575 ft (175 m)
Since the Board expected turbines to achieve greater efficiency, Nevada was equipped with a pair of direct-drive
Nevada's engines were rated at 26,500
Armament
The Nevadas were equipped a main battery of ten
The guns fired a 1,400-pound (635 kg) armor-piercing (AP) shell at a muzzle velocity of 2,600 feet per second (790 m/s). Trials with the triple turret revealed excessive dispersion caused by interference between the projectiles while in flight, so a system was adopted to fire each gun individually, separated by a tenth of a second apiece. The turrets allowed elevation to 15 degrees and depression to −5 degrees. At maximum elevation, the guns had a range of about 21,140 yd (19,330 m).[18] Two shell hoists serviced all three guns, which were electrically loaded and operated.[19][20]
For defense against destroyers and torpedo boats, the ships carried a secondary battery of twenty-one 5-inch /51 caliber Mark VIII guns in individual mounts. Twelve of the guns were in casemates in the forecastle deck, six on either side, and another six were in casemates toward the stern at main deck level, with another weapon directly in the stern. These guns proved to be excessively wet in heavy seas and thus were frequently unusable, as experience with earlier vessels had already demonstrated. The last two guns were in open mounts on either side of the conning tower. The guns had a muzzle velocity of 3,150 ft/s (960 m/s) firing a 50-pound (23 kg) shell.[12][13][21]
As was customary for capital ships of the period, both vessels were armed with a pair of 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes submerged below the waterline, one on each broadside.[13] They were supplied with Bliss-Leavitt torpedoes of the Mark VII type; these carried a 321 lb (146 kg) warhead and had a range of 12,500 yd (11,400 m) at a speed of 27 kn (50 km/h; 31 mph). Nevada and Oklahoma were the first battleships to carry the Mark 7 torpedoes.[22]
Armor
The Nevada class was protected by side armor that was 13.5 in thick in the central portion where it protected the ship's vitals, the magazines and propulsion machinery spaces. It was 17 ft 4.6 in (5 m) wide, of which 8 ft 6 in (2.59 m) was below the
The ships' main battery turrets received very heavy armor protection; the triple turret faces were 18 in (457 mm) thick, with 10 in (254 mm) sides and 5 in roofs. The twin-gun turrets had slightly thinner protection, consisting of 16 in (406 mm) faces and 9 in (229 mm) sides. Both turret types had 9 in rears and they rested atop barbettes that were 13 in thick. The conning tower had 16 in sides and a 8 in roof, the latter consisting of STS. The uptakes from the boilers to the funnel were protected by a conical mantlet that was 13 in thick.[13][25]
Modifications
The ships underwent a series of changes over the course of their careers, particularly with regards to their secondary batteries, along with the addition of a tertiary
In the late 1920s, both ships were substantially modernized. Both were re-boilered with six Bureau Express boilers that were significantly more efficient than the original twelve boilers. In addition, Nevada was re-engined using the turbines that had been installed in
Both vessels' armament was significantly improved. The main battery turrets were modified to allow elevation to thirty degrees, which increased their maximum range to 34,300 yd (31,400 m).
In 1942, during repairs for the damage sustained in the Japanese
Ships in class
Ship name | Hull no. [34][35] | Builder [34][35] | Laid down [34][35] | Launched [34][35] | Commissioned [34][35] | Fate [34][35] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nevada | BB-36 | Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Fore River Shipyard, Quincy, Massachusetts
|
4 November 1912 | 11 July 1914 | 11 March 1916 | Struck 12 August 1948; Sunk as a target 31 July 1948 |
Oklahoma | BB-37 | New York Shipbuilding Corporation, Camden, New Jersey | 26 October 1912 | 23 March 1914 | 2 May 1916 | Struck 1 September 1944; Hulk sank while under tow, 17 May 1947 |
Service history
Early careers
After entering service in 1916, both vessels were assigned to the
Throughout the 1920s, both ships participated in a yearly routine of training exercises with the rest of the fleet, including shooting practice, tactical training, and annual, large-scale
As tensions with Japan began to rise in the late 1930s over the latter's waging of the
World War II
On the morning of 7 December 1941, the Japanese aircraft carriers of the
After returning to service in 1943, Nevada was primarily used to support amphibious operations. She took part in the
Nevada then returned to the United States to have her badly-worn barrels relined before returning to the Pacific Fleet. She arrived in the advance base at
Worn out after nearly thirty years of service by late 1945, she was slated for disposal in
Footnotes
Notes
- ^ They have also been called "super" dreadnoughts.[1]
- ^ "/45 caliber" refers to the length of the gun in terms of calibers, or the bore diameter of the gun.
Citations
- ^ "The Nevada Leaves Quincy". The New York Times. 23 October 1925. p. 5. Retrieved 13 December 2023.
- ^ Friedman 1985, p. 101.
- ^ Friedman 1985, p. 102.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 101–102.
- ^ Breyer, pp. 59, 209.
- ^ Jordan, p. 8.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 102–103.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 103–105.
- ^ Friedman 1985, p. 107.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 107, 111.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 111, 113.
- ^ a b c d e Friedman 1985, p. 438.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Friedman 1986, p. 115.
- ^ Cox 1916.
- ^ Prange, Goldstein, & Dillon, p. 217.
- ^ Breyer, p. 209.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 107, 111, 438.
- ^ Friedman 1985, p. 135.
- ^ Friedman 2011, pp. 159–162.
- ^ a b Campbell, p. 121.
- ^ Friedman 2011, p. 185.
- ^ Friedman 2011, pp. 342–343.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 107, 438.
- ^ Breyer, pp. 209–210.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 107–108, 438.
- ^ a b c Breyer, p. 210.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 175–176, 179.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 190, 197, 201, 438.
- ^ Friedman 1985, pp. 190, 201, 438.
- ^ Friedman 1980, p. 91.
- ^ a b Friedman 1985, p. 369.
- ^ Breyer, pp. 189, 210.
- ^ Friedman 1980, pp. 91–92.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Cressman.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Havern.
- ^ Delgado, pp. 23, 33.
References
- Breyer, Siegfried (1974). Battleships and Battle Cruisers 1905–1970. Doubleday and Company. ISBN 978-0-385-07247-2.
- Campbell, John (1985). Naval Weapons of World War Two. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-459-4.
- Cox, Ormund L., Lt. (1916). "U.S.S. Nevada; Description and Trials". Journal of the American Society of Naval Engineers. 28: 20. doi:10.1111/j.1559-3584.1916.tb00598.x. Retrieved 5 September 2008.)
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link - Cressman, Robert J. (7 December 2016). "Oklahoma (Battleship No. 37): 1916-1944". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Navy Department, Naval History & Heritage Command. Retrieved 29 November 2019.
- Delgado, James P. (1991). The Archeology of the Atomic Bomb: A Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment of the Sunken Fleet of Operation Crossroads at Bikini and Kwajalein Atoll Lagoons, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Santa Fe: Submerged Cultural Resources Unit, National Maritime Initiative. OCLC 214771149.
- Friedman, Norman (2011). Naval Weapons of World War One. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-84832-100-7.
- Friedman, Norman (1980). "United States of America". In Gardiner, Robert & Chesneau, Roger (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1922–1946. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. pp. 86–166. ISBN 978-0-87021-913-9.
- Friedman, Norman (1985). U.S. Battleships: An Illustrated Design History. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-0-87021-715-9.
- Friedman, Norman (1986). "United States of America". In Gardiner, Robert & Gray, Randal (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. London: Conway Maritime Press. pp. 105–133. ISBN 978-0-85177-245-5.
- Havern, Christopher B. (12 December 2016). "Nevada II (Battleship No. 36): 1916–1948". Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Navy Department, Naval History and Heritage Command. Retrieved 29 November 2019.
- Jordan, John (2011). Warships after Washington: The Development of Five Major Fleets 1922-1930. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-973-6.
- Prange, Gordon W.; Goldstein, Donald M. & Dillon, Katherine V. (1991). At Dawn We Slept. New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-015734-4.