Reionization

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Part of a series on
Physical cosmology
Early universe
Backgrounds
Expansion · Future
Components · Structure
Components
Structure
Experiments
Scientists
Subject history
Phases of the reionization

In the fields of

dark ages
".

Reionization is the second of two major phase transitions of gas in the universe[citation needed] (the first is recombination). While the majority of baryonic matter in the universe is in the form of hydrogen and helium, reionization usually refers strictly to the reionization of hydrogen, the element.

It is believed that the primordial helium also experienced the same phase of reionization changes, but at different points in the history of the universe. This is usually referred to as helium reionization.

Background

Schematic timeline of the universe, depicting reionization's place in cosmic history.

The first phase change of hydrogen in the universe was

ionization rate.[citation needed] The universe was opaque before the recombination, due to the scattering of photons (of all wavelengths) off free electrons (and free protons, to a significantly lesser extent), but it became increasingly transparent as more electrons and protons combined to form neutral hydrogen atoms. While the electrons of neutral hydrogen can absorb photons of some wavelengths by rising to an excited state
, a universe full of neutral hydrogen will be relatively opaque only at those absorbed wavelengths, but transparent throughout most of the spectrum. The Dark Ages of the universe start at that point, because there were no light sources other than the gradually redshifting cosmic background radiation.

The second phase change occurred once gas clouds started to condense in the early universe that were energetic enough to re-ionize neutral hydrogen. As these objects formed and radiated energy, the universe reverted from being composed of neutral atoms, to once again being an ionized plasma. This occurred between 150 million and one billion years after the Big Bang (at a redshift 20 > z > 6).[citation needed] At that time, however, matter had been diffused by the expansion of the universe, and the scattering interactions of photons and electrons were much less frequent than before electron-proton recombination. Thus, the universe was full of low density ionized hydrogen and remained transparent, as is the case today.

Detection methods

Looking back so far in the history of the universe presents some observational challenges. There are, however, a few observational methods for studying reionization.

Quasars and the Gunn-Peterson trough

One means of studying reionization uses the

intergalactic medium (IGM), absorption
at those wavelengths is highly likely.

For nearby objects in the universe, spectral absorption lines are very sharp, as only photons with energies just sufficient to cause an atomic transition can cause that transition. However, the distances between quasars and the telescopes which detect them are large, which means that the

Gunn-Peterson trough.[1]

The redshifting for a particular quasar provides temporal information about reionization. Since an object's redshift corresponds to the time at which it emitted the light, it is possible to determine when reionization ended. Quasars below a certain redshift (closer in space and time) do not show the Gunn-Peterson trough (though they may show the Lyman-alpha forest), while quasars emitting light prior to reionization will feature a Gunn-Peterson trough. In 2001, four quasars were detected by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey with redshifts ranging from z = 5.82 to z = 6.28. While the quasars above z = 6 showed a Gunn-Peterson trough, indicating that the IGM was still at least partly neutral, the ones below did not, meaning the hydrogen was ionized. As reionization is expected to occur over relatively short timescales, the results suggest that the universe was approaching the end of reionization at z = 6.[2] This, in turn, suggests that the universe must still have been almost entirely neutral at z > 10. On the other hand, long absorption troughs persisting down to z < 5.5 in the Lyman-alpha and Lyman-beta forests suggest that reionization potentially extends later than z = 6.[3][4]

CMB anisotropy and polarization

The anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background on different angular scales can also be used to study reionization. Photons undergo scattering when there are free electrons present, in a process known as Thomson scattering. However, as the universe expands, the density of free electrons will decrease, and scattering will occur less frequently. In the period during and after reionization, but before significant expansion had occurred to sufficiently lower the electron density, the light that composes the CMB will experience observable Thomson scattering. This scattering will leave its mark on the CMB anisotropy map, introducing secondary anisotropies (anisotropies introduced after recombination).[5] The overall effect is to erase anisotropies that occur on smaller scales. While anisotropies on small scales are erased, polarization anisotropies are actually introduced because of reionization.[6] By looking at the CMB anisotropies observed, and comparing with what they would look like had reionization not taken place, the electron column density at the time of reionization can be determined. With this, the age of the universe when reionization occurred can then be calculated.

The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe allowed that comparison to be made. The initial observations, released in 2003, suggested that reionization took place from 30 > z > 11.[7] This redshift range was in clear disagreement with the results from studying quasar spectra. However, the three year WMAP data returned a different result, with reionization beginning at z = 11 and the universe ionized by z = 7.[8] This is in much better agreement with the quasar data.

Results in 2018 from Planck mission, yield an instantaneous reionization redshift of z = 7.68 ± 0.79.[9]

The parameter usually quoted here is τ, the "optical depth to reionization," or alternatively, zre, the redshift of reionization, assuming it was an instantaneous event. While this is unlikely to be physical, since reionization was very likely not instantaneous, zre provides an estimate of the mean redshift of reionization.

21-cm line

Even with the quasar data roughly in agreement with the CMB anisotropy data, there are still a number of questions, especially concerning the energy sources of reionization and the effects on, and role of,

Low Frequency Array (LOFAR), Murchison Widefield Array (MWA), Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT), Mapper of the IGM Spin Temperature (MIST), the Dark Ages Radio Explorer (DARE) mission, and the Large-Aperture Experiment to Detect the Dark Ages
(LEDA).

Energy sources

Astronomers hope to use observations such as this 2018 Hubble Space Telescope image to answer the question of how the Universe was reionised.[13]

While observations have come in which narrow the window during which the epoch of reionization could have taken place, it is still uncertain which objects provided the photons that reionized the IGM. To ionize neutral hydrogen, an energy larger than 13.6 eV is required, which corresponds to photons with a wavelength of 91.2 nm or shorter. This is in the ultraviolet part of the electromagnetic spectrum, which means that the primary candidates are all sources which produce a significant amount of energy in the ultraviolet and above. How numerous the source is must also be considered, as well as the longevity, as protons and electrons will recombine if energy is not continuously provided to keep them apart. Altogether, the critical parameter for any source considered can be summarized as its "emission rate of hydrogen-ionizing photons per unit cosmological volume."[14] With these constraints, it is expected that quasars and first generation stars and galaxies were the main sources of energy.[15]

Dwarf galaxies

Dwarf galaxies are currently considered to be the primary source of ionizing photons during the epoch of reionization.[16][17] For most scenarios, this would require the log-slope of the UV galaxy luminosity function, often denoted α, to be steeper than it is today, approaching α = -2.[16] With the advent of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), constraints on the UV luminosity function at the Epoch of Reionization have become commonplace,[18][19]
allowing for better constraints on the faint, low-mass population of galaxies.

In 2014, two separate studies identified two

Tololo-1247-232.[20][21][23] Finding local LyC emitters has thus become crucial to the theories about the early universe and the epoch of reionization.[20][21]

Subsequently, motivated, a series of surveys have been conducted using Hubble Space Telescope's Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (HST/COS) to measure the LyC directly.[24][25][26][27][28][29] These efforts culminated in the Low-redshift Lyman Continuum Survey,[30] a large HST/COS program which nearly tripled the number of direct measurements of the LyC from dwarf galaxies. To date, at least 50 LCEs have been confirmed using HST/COS[30] with LyC escape fractions anywhere from ≈ 0 to 88%. The results from the Low-redshift Lyman Continuum Survey have provided the empirical foundation necessary to identify and understand LCEs at the Epoch of Reionization.[31][32][33] With new observations from JWST, populations of LCEs are now being studied at cosmological redshifts greater than 6, allowing for the first time a detailed and direct assessment of the origins of cosmic Reionization.[34] Combining these large samples of galaxies with new constraints on the UV luminosity function indicates that dwarf galaxies overwhelmingly contribute to Reionization.[35]

Quasars

active galactic nuclei (AGN), were considered a good candidate source because they are highly efficient at converting mass to energy, and emit a great deal of light above the threshold for ionizing hydrogen. It is unknown, however, how many quasars existed prior to reionization. Only the brightest of quasars present during reionization can be detected, which means there is no direct information about dimmer quasars that existed. However, by looking at the more easily observed quasars in the nearby universe, and assuming that the luminosity function (number of quasars as a function of luminosity) during reionization will be approximately the same as it is today, it is possible to make estimates of the quasar populations at earlier times. Such studies have found that quasars do not exist in high enough numbers to reionize the IGM alone,[14][36] saying that "only if the ionizing background is dominated by low-luminosity AGNs can the quasar luminosity function provide enough ionizing photons."[37]

Population III stars

intergalactic medium at an early era. Supernova explosions produce such heavy elements, so hot, large, Population III stars which will form supernovae are a possible mechanism for reionization. While they have not been directly observed, they are consistent according to models using numerical simulation[38] and current observations.[39] A gravitationally lensed galaxy also provides indirect evidence of Population III stars.[40] Even without direct observations of Population III stars, they are a compelling source. They are more efficient and effective ionizers than Population II stars, as they emit more ionizing photons,[41] and are capable of reionizing hydrogen on their own in some reionization models with reasonable initial mass functions.[42] As a consequence, Population III stars are currently considered the most likely energy source to initiate the reionization of the universe,[43]
though other sources are likely to have taken over and driven reionization to completion.

In June 2015, astronomers reported evidence for Population III stars in the Cosmos Redshift 7 galaxy at z = 6.60. Such stars are likely to have existed in the very early universe (i.e., at high redshift), and may have started the production of chemical elements heavier than hydrogen that are needed for the later formation of planets and life as we know it.[44][45]

See also

Notes and references

  1. doi:10.1086/148444
    .
  2. S2CID 14117521
    .
  3. ISSN 1365-2966
    .
  4. ISSN 0004-637X
    .
  5. S2CID 11253251
    .
  6. S2CID 119360903
    .
  7. S2CID 15253442
    .
  8. S2CID 1386346
    .
  9. S2CID 119335614
    .
  10. S2CID 7343629
    .
  11. S2CID 118436837
    .
  12. ^ "Astronomers detect light from the Universe's first stars". 28 February 2018. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
  13. ^ "Hubble opens its eye again". www.spacetelescope.org. Retrieved 17 December 2018.
  14. ^
    S2CID 17932350
    .
  15. S2CID 119094218
    .
  16. ^
    S2CID 118856513
    .
  17. S2CID 73567045
    .
  18. ISSN 0067-0049
    .
  19. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3471
    .
  20. ^
    S2CID 119294145
    .
  21. ^
    arXiv:1404.2958v1 [astro-ph.GA
    ].
  22. S2CID 232092358
    .
  23. S2CID 118617426
    .
  24. S2CID 3033749
    .
  25. ISSN 0035-8711
    .
  26. ISSN 0035-8711
    .
  27. ISSN 0035-8711
    .
  28. ISSN 1538-4357
    .
  29. ISSN 0035-8711
    .
  30. ^
    ISSN 0067-0049
    .
  31. S2CID 246411216
    .
  32. ISSN 0004-637X
    .
  33. ISSN 0035-8711
    .
  34. S2CID 255546596
    .
  35. arXiv:2309.02219. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help
    )
  36. doi:10.1086/185015
    .
  37. S2CID 119339804
    .
  38. S2CID 5758398
    .
  39. arXiv:astro-ph/9802189
    .
  40. S2CID 17808828
    .
  41. Bibcode:2002ASPC..267..433T
    .
  42. S2CID 17737785
    .
  43. S2CID 12753436
    .
  44. S2CID 18471887
    .
  45. ^ Overbye, Dennis (17 June 2015). "Astronomers Report Finding Earliest Stars That Enriched Cosmos". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 June 2015.

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reionization&oldid=1218782065"