User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 32

I was looking for a reason to not delete. But I think the reason I gave was lame. perhaps not deleted by anyone else for 24 hours would be a better reason to detag. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that substituting an equally lame rationale for the original lame rationale is much of a defense.

Also, I see that you still have the re-created userbox on your user page: will you remove it now, or does there have to be yet another MFD? --Calton | Talk 09:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is on my user page is not a template or user box. In the past my user page was protected to prevent easy vandalism of it, and some were blocked because of their behaviour (not by me though). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it did start with "{{userbox"... No idea why you added the line about "some were blocked because of their behaviour" line, perhaps for the chilling effect, but in the end it is all sophistry and stonewalling. I have removed the userbox from your user page, I'ld suggest you start a DRV if you want these userboxes to be acceptable once again.

Fram (talk) 12:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

What is on my user page is not a template or user box.

You have GOT to be kidding me: this is the line you're going to try to peddle? It is NOT a user box only in the ludicrously technical rationale that you didn't use a template, you hard-coded it. And the ONLY reason I didn't remove it directly was to give you the chance to do the right thing -- which you failed to do -- so save the veiled threats. --Calton | Talk 12:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm truly impressed by the loads of information you have provided us with! :) Myself, I've just done my first header, lol.

Since you probably spend lots of time working in front of your PC I want to give you this goat as a little company. She will never bother you at the wrong time!

Thank you for sharing your knowledge with others and, please, keep up the good work as long as you enjoy it. <3

Wishing you Good luck from Anna S, Stockholm, Sweden.

AnnaGsann (talk) 08:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graeme,

Hope you're well. I'm just leaving a message to query two of the three

For reference, in order of CSD application, I'm talking about:

1. Special:Diff/980502903
2. Special:Diff/980326414
3. Special:Diff/980506327

The second and third declines are the ones I want to ask about.

On the second one, you said in the linked edit summary this has been around for 13 years, so no speedy delete, use prod or afd. As I've been off-wiki for a while, I re-checked Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and it doesn't seem that longevity of an article exempts it from speedy deletion.

On the third one, you said in the linked edit summary Spam delete declined, there are lots of earlier versions to revert to if required. It is correct that speedy deletion is only applicable if all revisions fulfil a speedy deletion criterion, however I am struggling to find a revision of the article in question which is not blatantly promotional.

I fully accept that CSD is meant for unambiguous cases and that, especially when it comes to what constitutes salvageable material, a lot of ambiguity can arise, however in order to improve my tagging in future I thought it would be useful to get your perspective in more detail on these declines. I've followed your advice of using a PROD on the second one and applied it to all three because in each case, after having examined the sources in more depth and their previous revisions, I've concluded that aside from the evident

Many thanks,

SITH (talk) 13:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@StraussInTheHouse: For me to delete for a G11 reason, the tone of the article must be promotional throughout. Otherwise if there is only a small amount of promotion, it could be removed easily by editing. This may result in a different opinion as to whether promotion is "blatant". For articles that have been around a long time, if many different people have edited it in the past and failed to notice the promotion, then it is probably not so promotional as to be speedy deleted. Sometimes if I think that the topic of the page looks good I will decline a G11 and remove some promotional text. We also have the problem that many that put in an article, do so for promotion. But if they are skilled in writing, they can avoid promotional tone and pufferry and yet have a biased article. For example there can be articles that talk about a company's leadership, philanthropy, awards and products that are obviously intended to promote the company, but are not G11 material, as all they need is balance, and removal of overemphasis on unencyclopedic content. In the last week I have deleted quite a few pages for G11 reasons. One issue that casued a dispute, that you can read above, is where a page with very little content, eg a just a name, personal weblink or phone number, appears. Is that a spam if it is a sandbox or draft? If on a userpage it would be acceptable. As a draft I have deleted some of these as test-pages, as the writer did not really intend to make an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:44, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme Bartlett, fair enough, thank you for taking the time to explain SITH (talk) 11:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was wondering whether you could please check this wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Proxima_Centauri_c I edited it saying the exoplanet is still a candidate, but one user (SevenSpheresCelestia) keeps saying the exoplanet was confirmed. As you can see, he only provides 1 source (which is just a research note), and for an exoplanet to be confirmed, it has to be officially confirmed but at least 2 different peer-reviewed papers. I don't want to reverse his edit, because we haven't reached consensus in the Talk page. I think the page he did under a different name (ConnallES) should be kept, but I would say that it's better to call Proxima c a candidate or unconfirmed exoplanet because only 1 author says it's confirmed and all the other recent papers (from this year) still call it a candidate not confirmed.

(This bit seems to be written by

talk · contribs

) )

Following this you declined because it wasn’t blatantly promotional, fair enough, but addendum you included was that the article was “unsubmitted” Now, if or not an article is submitted or unsubmitted, a G11 would still apply regardless if it is blatantly promotional. I just thought to let you know this as the G, in G11 means General & applies across all spectrums. Thank you for your time. Celestina007 (talk) 18:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was describing the AFC state of the article. If it was submitted then it could get a reject as promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graeme Bartlett. Just letting you know I've deleted this file and others you've declined. Normally I would agree with you, but the uploader is currently the subject of a CCI and has admitted they are unsure about the copyright statuses of their uploads. Unless you have evidence proving these files are free, I think they should be deleted. -FASTILY 00:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can tell from the dates what the copyright status is. Pre-1946 photos from Australia are public domain in US and Australia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chlorimides has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:44, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I need you to review Draft:Fordeal, I have made great improvements. Please help me.36.103.228.81 (talk) 07:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have commented. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved Draft:Webull. Please help me review it. 150.223.17.4 (talk) 15:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is already plenty of reviewing and comments already there. You need to find substantial writings on the topic. Not single-liners. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett:Thank you for your valuable suggestion, I think I have founded some substantial writings on this topic and improved it. Please help me review Draft:Webull again. Thank you again! 150.223.17.4 (talk) 07:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome job creating the WP:DYK as I think it would make a great main page fact, it was a landmark discovery. If you would like to modify the nomination in any way, you can do so here Template:Did you know nominations/Carbonaceous sulfur hydride. Feel free to add alternatives or reword anything you want. Footlessmouse (talk) 04:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Good day Graeme Bartlett, those two templates deliver similar information. Would you think about merging them? -- Ktsquare (talk) 18:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fluorides has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have the copy of the deleted page about the fictional locations in Thomas and friends, can you restore it? Thanks!2604:6000:130F:4FB6:B0FC:C220:C626:2953 (talk) 04:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See here, it is no deleted: User:Djm-leighpark/List of fictional locations in Thomas & Friends. We are not associated with the TTTE wiki so cannot put up the page there. Perhaps you can register an account, or ask somebody there to assist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

]

Your draft article,

Draft:Otolin

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Otolin

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Nicole Couch § Infobox image. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Hi Graeme. I know you've already tried to sort this out per User talk:Philip H Taylor#Unspecified source/license for File:Nicole Couch.jpeg and I'm not trying to step on your toes or anything like that, but I think the best thing here would be OTRS verification. The actual source given for the file is Facebook, not the label's website, and even though the images are practically the same one is in color and one isn't. The provenance of the file isn't very clear at all and even being generous in assuming good faith still leaves a lot of unknowns that I think would lead to problems on Commmons (which is where a CC-0 licensed file should really be) per c:COM:PCP. If, however, you think my concerns are unwarranted, then I'll respect that and self-revert the npd tag per talk page discussion. However, I think in that case it would be better to change the source of the image and even perhaps replace the BW one with the color one. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Carbonaceous sulfur hydride, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the synthetic compound carbonaceous sulfur hydride is the world's first room-temperature superconductor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Carbonaceous sulfur hydride. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Carbonaceous sulfur hydride), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Wikipedia Motivation Barnstar
		Thanks on quick reviews. Akrasia25 (talk) 21:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graeme!

I'm a new contributor to Wikipedia, and still learning the ropes. I drafted an article (

The Draft page says if I want to recreate a page similar to the one that was originally deleted, I should first contact the user that deleted it - that's why I'm reaching out to you. :)

My apologies for the confusion, I'm still learning. Could I try writing this article again?

Precise315 (talk) 03:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:OTRS team to send them an email to prove that your Wikipedia logon is who you claim to be. Then content written by the claimed person can be believed to be from them. Given the progress made on the draft, it probably is best to just write it again without copying from any other previous publication. Part of the reason for this, is that this is an encyclopedia with a different purpose to a university biography. I note that https://cps-vo.org/node/33312 has a creative commons 2.5 license. However it is unclear what that is, as there are several different creative commons licenses. Compatible ones are CC-BY, CC-BY-SA-3.0, CC-0. Licenses with -ND or -NC do not permit use on Wikipedia. So if that is your web site, you may relicense under one of the compatible licenses. There is also a standard way to display the license, with a link to the text, a logo and standard abbreviations. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

@Graeme Bartlett: Thanks for all the advice, I appreciate it. I agree that it would be best to write it again without copying any content, that's definitely my plan for the rewrite. I'll give it another go! Precise315 (talk) 02:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey- I am thinking about adding this map [4] to the Geography section on the Russell Islands page you created [5]. Please let me know what you think. Geographyinitiative (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Geographyinitiative: The map does look a bit better, but because it is non-free, it is replaceable, and so we should not use it. If you find a commonwealth of Australia map from 1969 or before it will be public domain now. Also much material on ga.gov.au is under a CC-BY license, but with a quick look I couldn't find a map of Russell islands. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another compatible map is on openstreetmap: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/-9.0726/159.1322 You could add the names found on the map you uploaded, to openstreetmap, and then take a copy of that to use on Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:29, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Done – as a
  CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Squeeps10: it's back for you to improve. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Thank you kindly. --Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 06:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't "ignore" your edit,

WP:SYSOP, Occasional mistakes are entirely compatible with adminship; administrators are not expected to be perfect. Like all administrators, I am not perfect. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

P.S. I hope you know, Squeebs10, that you can always go to the admin who deleted a page to ask questions about it. I could have restored that page for you if you had asked. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, perhaps "ignored" was a poor choice of words. I have changed it to "did not see". As for your second point, I was aware of that fact, but

WP:REFUND/G13 wasn't working for some reason and I saw Graeme had been active in undeletion requests lately, so I asked him to do it since I knew it was something he was comfortable doing. Should something similar happen again, I'll be sure to ask the deleting administrator. --SqueePs10 ^Talk_{My edits} 02:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I am pretty sure if you asked on

WP:REFUND it would have come back too, as well as asking deleting admin. Any you may well get a more speedy response there, as individual admins are not working 24 hours a day. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi @Graeme Bartlett: I see this has been recreated, along with no references and lots external links in the body. Is that not supposed to go Draft after it has been created. scope_creep^Talk 09:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was soft-deleted, it was restored on request. This is not what I would call recreated, more like restored. You are welcome to improve the article. To me it sounds promotional in tone. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering, is there a blank edit of mine underneath this page? can it be restored? Starzoner (talk) 13:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Starzoner: this is one of the confusing cases. there were two revisions you wrote: The first was totally blank with an edit summary of "New Page for township in China", and the second revision says: "The Last of Us is an upcoming tv show." These orphaned revision might have come from User:Starzoner/2015. But since they are nothing to do with this topic, I will leave them deleted. What is there now is a merging of revision you wrote, and what Rusted AutoParts wrote an hour before. So pick the best of the writings. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok. I had repurposed them because of that, and didn't realize those happened. Thank you so much though. Starzoner (talk) 02:25, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just created a new page: Piperolactam_A, please reveiw it. Thanks in advance

•  Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, this edit that you made on a duplicative draft article for Yugoslavia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1968 reset the 6 month wait period for its automatic deletion on its last day. A while back I asked for it to be deleted administratively because the original author ended up making a real article as well, meaning the draft has no use. Any chance you could help me delete it? I'd rather not wait another 6 months. Grk1011 (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Grk1011: It won't be deleted on your request as user:Taurussweden asked for this to be restored after it was already deleted. But Taurussweden could ask for deletion, or it could be redirected to the article space. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was created on May 11, but the next day May 12 Taurussweden realized the redirect could just be removed in the article space and appears to have never returned to the Draft except because it was going to be deleted. Confused maybe? @Taurussweden: do you intend to work on the Draft article or the real one? Grk1011 (talk) 16:03, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: If @Grk1011: statement above is correct, then, please delete my article. comment by Taurussweden

• I will delete the draft in that case. I see you do not need it @Taurussweden: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you returning to this nomination to fix the issues? Yoninah (talk) 00:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Graeme Bartlett

I'm currently in the process of writing an ANI, but it is my first one and I'm unsure if people believe I have a case. Could you have a look at it?

It has been 2 years since the last

Thanks in advance for the help. Skjoldbro (talk) 10:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:boomerang. Perhaps the place to talk about it in general is Wikipedia talk:Image use policy. As that policy should cover this situation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for the response. I'm going to try at ANI anyways as I believe the user to break civility and core content policies. Skjoldbro (talk) 11:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you weighed in on the copyright issue with my article Streetsound - that was several weeks back. I was wondering how long might a copyright review by the admins take, and if you had any other suggestions that i might pursue? thanks in advance.. Chris Torella Ctorella 15:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really I do not know every one is a volunteer, and I suppose many do not do anything on the weekend. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC).. thanks I'll keep watch! Chris Torella Ctorella 13:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Darling, thank you so much for bringing as draft. Can you help me to set this draft as an article up ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felipe Fanzeres (talk • contribs) 23:27, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a way to address me (unless you know me outside Wikipedia). Anyway you should talk to user:Samudra Malla about this, as he moved it backwards and forwards, and wrote most content, but also blanked it. One way to get a review is to add the {{subst:submit}} template to it. But perhaps you should investigate third party references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	PERFECTLY SPLENDID, Thank you so much. Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 23:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Hello. I've seen you have improved several articles I've created, so I wanted to thank you for your work. Regards. ExoEditor 17:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi, it's been nearly 2 weeks since this was reviewed. The page creator has not edited for nearly a month. Are you going to pursue it, or should it be closed as unsuccessful? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme Bartlett, final notice for this nomination. It is so severely undercited that I don't see much point in holding it open given how long the article has sat without editing since its original review. If nothing has been done in the next couple of days, I expect to mark it for closure this weekend. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey bro, could you add the picture of chemical synthesis in synthesis part of the article from this URL: ^[1] in Tropine and/or Tropacocaine. I am not sure if chemical synthesis falls under copyright? Leave message at my talk page if it causes any copyright issues.

Machinexa (talk) 11:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since the URL is being rendered in bad way at your talk page, use the URL from the following page Tropine Tropacocaine reference.

Machinexa (talk) 11:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The image would be at https://www.seanmichaelragan.com/img/cocaine_analog_in_two_steps_from_native_plant_material.png But I think that would be a copyright problem. Something that is just a molecular structure is not subject to copyright. But the synthesis has too many creative choices in it. @Machinexa: I lost chemdraw a few years ago when my machine upgraded, so my chemical diagram capability is very pathetic now. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Got it Machinexa (talk) 12:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed the artist niche of Wikipedia is very rich though I had the wish to contribute in that segment. Olivier Mourão seemed a good candidate to me for inclusion initially so I decided to write an article on him. I have been relying primarily on his website for the information. I gradually came to know about importance of secondary sources and

I assume that this means that User:Felipe Fanzeres wants this to become an article and has contested your delete request. If he can come up with more sources, that is fine, but if he does nothing then the page will become deleted in 6 months anyway. It is not a harmful page, so I would suggest you give other editors that are interested a chance. Of course writing in the article has to be in English, but sources do not. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Graeme, I see what you mean. Well, he's an international artist, so i love his art and trying to set his wikipedia article on, so i found a lot of materials in various places, such a beautiful art.I would like your mentoring to add more materials, because I have at least 15 new sources/links to add on his wiki article. Can you mentor me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felipe Fanzeres (talk • contribs) 11:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First step is to sign your talk with ~~~~ since I cannot easily tell who you are. Using the square brackets [[Draft:Olivier Mourão]] to get Draft:Olivier Mourão, you can get a link to the page (I hope that is right) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Felipe Fanzeres: I have restored the Draft:Olivier Mourão again. So please get in quick and add your sources - perhaps at the end if you have no text to add yet.

Graeme, i'm sorry for bothering you again, my edition wasn't clear enough to bring the article Online again. Can you help me to edit correctly ? I really want to do the right thing, but i need some help. Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 19:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Felipe Fanzeres[reply]

I suggest that you start writing from scratch. Before you only removed text and added tags. But to be a significant author you would have to write some text. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graeme, thank you so much for everything. Well, i see now the point, i'm working with a friend to improve the article again, give me a chance to fix all the issues i've got with this draft. I really want to collaborate with WP and help a lot of people. But before, help me with this Olivier Mourao. Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 00:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Felipe Fanzeres[reply]

@Felipe Fanzeres: you still have not recreated Draft:Olivier Mourão. Your first step should be to create the page and add some content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the best option would be to use this Draft that was deleted rather than create a new article. So the best thing to do is to create a new article? Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Felipe Fanzeres[reply]

The reason is that the creator of that draft does not want it there, so it keeps being deleted. But if you create your own writing then that option will not be available to another. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This was the main article which has been continually updated by User ‎Celco85 who you banned for 24 hours a couple of days ago for disruptive editing, over the past month or so. In conjunction with User:MarnetteD we had only just cleaned up this article including the covering of a large number of bare URLs within the last hour, after I had reverted another one of Celco85's edits where he had included two unacceptable comments as well as having a new reference which did not work - coded incorrectly. I think the information which is being included is frivolous and unnecessary and are more reason for the two hat notes which another editor has placed on this article in November. Where do we go from here?Fleet Lists (talk) 05:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to ask about a page though. I recently created Draft:Reservation Dogs, and had noticed in the logs that it was deleted. Is there anything worth retrieving in the deleted edits? Starzoner (talk) 14:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Starzoner: there is nothing useful there, only 4 words in total, no infobox, no refs, no punctuation. Your draft is a much better starting point. Merry Christmas to you! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi Graeme, I'm bacak. Can I ask about

Draft:Halloween Ends? Its deleted twice but are there anything worth retrieving/keeping? Starzoner (talk) 15:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Graeme Bartlett, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Starzoner (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! Starzoner (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. You rejected my request for undeletion because the previous revision has more textures way beyond PD-simple. How about another release using the same artwork? I see smooth gloss and less texture. Is it free in the US? --George Ho (talk) 22:47, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well this picture has less texture, so perhaps the texture in the earlier uploaded image is artifact. (photographic sensor noise perhaps) However the discogs image has photographed wear and tear on the cover, and copyright would apply to that image. The red text is clearer than the one that was uploaded, but still there are .jpg artifacts. @George Ho: Merry Christmas to you! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:53, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

site got deleted becouse of this link if iunderstand correctly: source URL: forum.btcz.rocks/t/an-updated-bitcoinz-description/1325) That is list of links which are usable if you wanna connect with BitcoinZ community over social media, or if you wanna see description on youtube. and since i don't see my page anymore i cannot delete link to forum... i eavn dont remmeber puting one on site. can you please help with a little bit more details? and can i have a look in that deleted paragraph... i took me whole day to edit it and it was deleted in 5s without any conversation. regards rok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rokmik (talk • contribs) 13:08, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Well the text as written by someone with a different username, Nick Hill said: "BitcoinZ is an Bitcoin-like cryptocurrency incorporating ZK-Snark based private transactions. The code is based on a fork of Zcash. The blockchain is not a fork, and began with a new genesis block on 9th September 2017.". Here was a see also section, that is not required in an article like this. Basically we consider anything here to do with digital currencies an advertisement. But to argue about the deletion you must first consult with user talk:Jimfbleak rather than me. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Graeme Bartlett:, Belated Merry Christmas, and Happy New Year in advance, hope you get all the happiness you deserve. Can you please help me by marking the article Hero – Gayab Mode On as patrol/reviewed. Thanks for your consideration. --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 12:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you restored this on request from its editor. I've blocked that editor as a UPE. Since this draft is pretty rubbish, I've re-deleted as it obviously won't be going anywhere. Hope that's OK, if not, feel free to restore Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:07, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Graeme Bartlett: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. Starzoner (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

I wish you a prosperous 2021! Starzoner (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme, wish you a very happy year. All the blessings for you. Well, I'm here asking you for a last try. I'm studying a lot everything you told me and now i found out what you've been teaching. Help me to restore the Draft so i can do the edition on edition's page and not in the wrong place. Thank you so much and happy new year. Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Felipe Fanzeres[reply]

Happy new year

Felipe Fanzeres (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fault zone hydrogeology, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the permeability of rocks affected by faults can increase or decrease as a result of seismic activity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fault zone hydrogeology. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Geological structure measurement by LiDAR, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that LiDAR can be used to make a digital terrain model? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Earth system interactions across mountain belts.
Message added 02:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Graeme Bartlett, this is a courtesy notification that the three remaining geology nominations from November 15 have been marked for closure as abandoned since you have failed to respond to the issues raised despite multiple pings. If you should respond prior to their closure, consistent attention will be expected going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frank Kortan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Kortan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Kortan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theredproject (talk) 12:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the

Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

"Next Liberal Party of Canada leadership election" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Next Liberal Party of Canada leadership election. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Next Liberal Party of Canada leadership election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RevDel

Hi, I saw your name on the list of admins willing to handle RevDel. There's a draft

Draft:Victor Spinski I was asked to review and I think it might be ready for the mainspace. However, I've tagged it for RevDel because of a copyvio issue in its history and I'd like this to be fixed before moving. Would you mind having a look at that page? Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@Modussiccandi: I have done a revdel, if it is the appropriate revisions, please proceed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Yes, those were the appropriate ones. Have a great day and best, Modussiccandi (talk) 10:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PP template cleanup

Hi! Your cleanup edit in the Budapest article put {{

pp-move-indef}} and {{pp-pc}}. I think the two protection templates should remain together, any other template should be either before or after them. Could you please reconsider your cleanup regexp (or whatever you do the cleanup with)? Thanks in advance, —Tacsipacsi (talk) 14:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I have moved the short description. My main purpose in the edit was to correct "slightly". Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Syrp

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on

section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify

their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Jenyire2 (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

User:Starzoner

Hi Graeme Bartlett, I have noticed draft that deleted revisions of

Draft:The Greatest Beer Run Ever (film) have been restored, which is not bad of you, what if it is bad is to create a draft, abandon it and then when a user recreates it again, request its restoration, that's exactly what the user Starzoner do. It seems to me totally unnecessary to request restoration of editions that do not even add something new to the existing content. I want to take advantage and let you know about this that happened a couple of days ago and as the user in question is only interested in appearing as the creator of the articles in question. A few days ago I also requested the restoration of deleted editions of Draft:Spencer (film) which was rejected for just reasons. Regards. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 00:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I attach this link that confirms my opinion that Starzoner is only interested in "being the first" to create the articles. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 01:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you may want to see the deletion log. It was done so to remove the hoax edits, something that normally reverted and removed on Wikipedia. Starzoner (talk) 12:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I did that deletion of hoax. Anyway when restoring stuff I do have to consider whether to bring back other speedy deleted versions that may exist. Also useless history merges should not be performed as selective merges are very labor intensive. So if the current version did not use a draft of the same topic, there is no point in merging. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Katrina Spade, are you serious?

Would this be an encyclopedic character? Wikipedia is not a collection of creatives who propose non-profit projects. The recompose facebook page has 3000 likes, the articles have a ridiculous diffusion, more from gossip than from a project to be seriously considered. Beyond the opinion that one can have about the thing, it is not of an encyclopedic character in itself, as is not the creator. Let's be serious please. Harukanaru (talk) 22:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You should therefore start an AFD for

Katrina Spade. I accept AFC if it has more than 50% chance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Help

Hi! I have no idea how to ask for the DRV of Superkombat Fighting Championship (and also 2018 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2017 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2016 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2015 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2014 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2013 in SUPERKOMBAT, 2012 in SUPERKOMBAT and 2011 in SUPERKOMBAT)

Here are my reasons:

I request the undeletion of Superkombat Fighting Championship (plus all its pages - the years), because a mistake was made back in time. First of all this article had been deleted several times in the past because in the beginning the kickboxing promotion was unknown. And also there was a war on Wikipedia from the MMA "users" against kickboxing, until new regulations.

My reasons are:

1. These are precious info for the history of the sport, SUPERKOMBAT of top promoter Eduard Irimia is considered the 2nd best promotion of Europe all-time after the Netherlands-based It's Showtime. Before it was called Local Kombat (2003-2013). SUPERKOMBAT had headquarters in Bucharest, Romania, but also in London, Las Vegas and New York City.

2. SUPERKOMBAT was named Promotion of the Year in 2011 in front of GLORY (Ultimate Glory), that now is according to the Kickboxing task force "the kickboxing's UFC - World No 1. promotion in the world". Additionally, SUPERKOMBAT was nominated in the top 4 kickboxing promotions of the world.

3.

Alex Pereira and Pavel Zhuravlev competed in SUPERKOMBAT. GLORY title challengers Benjamin Adegbuyi, Daniel Ghiță, Errol Zimmerman, Mladen Brestovac, Anderson Silva, Yousri Belgaroui and Yoann Kongolo competed in SUPERKOMBAT. GLORY tournament winners Ismael Londt and D'Angelo Marshall competed in SUPERKOMBAT. Other top 10 kickboxers in their divisions competed in SUPERKOMBAT: Roman Kryklia (currently #2 heavyweight), Zabit Samedov (current #6 heavyweight), Murat Aygün (current #8 heavyweight), Tarik Khbabez (current #9 heavyweight), Felipe Micheletti (current #8 light heavyweight), Zinedine Hameur-Lain (current #10 light heavyweight), Igor Bugaenko (current #6 middleweight), Jamie Bates (current #5 welterweight) and many more from the past rankings. Several of these are SUPERKOMBAT products, it is proved that no other promotion has been feeding GLORY

like SUPERKOMBAT.

4. SUPERKOMBAT is not on Wikipedia, but even regional kickboxing promotions are allowed, such as King in the Ring, W5, Global Fighting Championship and more. Just saying, make justice for SUPERKOMBAT.

5. SUPERKOMBAT had received coverage from the largest European newspapers such as MARCA, Gazeta Sporturilor etc. It had a contract with the most known sports European channel Eurosport and also with CBS Sports in the United States of America. SUPERKOMBAT's official YouTube channel has fights with over 1 million views.

6. SUPERKOMBAT was still deleted, although 5 people said to Keep it and 3 to Delete it (4 with the nominator). The nominator Jayjg STRANGELY retired later from Wikipedia.

—.karellian-24 (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because there was a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superkombat Fighting Championship, there should be a discussion to reverse that decision. It is not that strange to retire. People have lives outside Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you do is add this wikitext to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2021_February_7&action=edit&preload=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/New_day

{{subst:drv2 |page=Superkombat Fighting Championship |xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superkombat Fighting Championship |reason=SUPERKOMBAT had received coverage from the largest European newspapers such as MARCA, Gazeta Sporturilor etc. It had a contract with the most known sports European channel [[Eurosport]] and also with [[CBS Sports]] in the United States of America. }} ~~~~

I have picked your strongest argument as the reason, It would be best to find the links to prove the coverage, as it would prove

WP:GNG if true. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks a lot! I really appreciate, buddy! —.karellian-24 (talk) 22:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Superkombat

Hi again! The articles must be renamed into:

Superkombat Fighting Championship to Superkombat (I will mention in the article the full name),

and

• 2018 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2018 in Superkombat
• 2017 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2017 in Superkombat
• 2016 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2016 in Superkombat
• 2015 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2015 in Superkombat
• 2014 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2014 in Superkombat
• 2013 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2013 in Superkombat
• 2012 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2012 in Superkombat
• 2011 in SUPERKOMBAT to 2011 in Superkombat

The other admin said so, per WP:MOSCAPS and WP:MOSTM.

Regards,

—.karellian-24 (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If they do get restored or recreated they can be renamed. A deleted page cannot be renamed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank lot, I will try to rename it after if it wil be recovered! I already know that, I just thought you can move the material but I will do it myself if gets recovered. —.karellian-24 (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Can you copy paste original text to

Characters in the Mario franchise#Poochy. thanks 2005-Fan (talk) 19:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

redacted text mucking page format

@2005-Fan: here is the maximum version. most of its life was a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 2005-Fan (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I added something here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Characters_in_the_Mario_franchise&type=revision&diff=1006635777&oldid=1006261970. 2005-Fan (talk) 23:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster.jpg

Hi Graeme. Since you've edited this file's page before

WP:NFCC#10c if a rationale isn't provided for that particular use. I don't know anything about the show and have no idea if the new logo is correct since the non-free use rationale wasn't updated when the file was updated. Any suggestions on what to do here? -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for taking a look at this Graeme. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK I have split the images to two files File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster.jpg, and File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster 3.jpg. Marchjuly can you use them appropriately and fix FURS as needed? We also need a source! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the uploader; so, I don't know where the file came from. I'll post a note on the uploader's page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a message about this on the uploader's user talk page; so, perhaps they will clarify the source of the file. Now, I'm wondering if you'd mind taking a look at

WP:F9; so, perhaps there's no point to spliting the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes, best to await discussion about whether any will be kept. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phenoxyacetic acid

Hi Graeme

There is a draft article

Draft:Phenoxyacetic Acid that has been awaiting review since it was created by a new editor last December. I have commented on their talk page User talk:Danidq1 that it has a large number of errors and would be better if its useful portions (e.g. the Chembox) were merged to Phenoxy herbicide. However, after a week the user has not responded to my comments. It would be helpful if you could formally decline the draft and suggest next steps. Thanks. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]