User:Hike395/altitudinal zonation

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Article titled either Altitudinal zonation or Ecology of mountains

Factors

Heating of solids, sunlight and shade in different altitudinal zones (Northern hemisphere).[1]

A variety of environmental factors determine the boundaries of altitudinal zones found on mountains, ranging from direct effects of temperature and

precipitation to indirect characteristics of the mountain itself, as well as biological interactions of the species. The cause of zonation is complex, due to many possible interactions and overlapping species ranges. Careful measurements and statistical tests are required prove the existence of discrete communities along an elevation gradient, as opposed to uncorrelated species ranges.[2]

Temperature

Decreasing air temperature usually coincides with increasing elevation, which directly influences the length of the growing season at different altitudes on the mountain.[3][4] For mountains located in deserts, extreme high temperatures also limit the ability of large trees to grow near the base of mountains.[5] In addition, plants can be especially sensitive to soil temperatures and can have specific elevation ranges that support healthy growth.[6]

Humidity

The humidity of certain zones, including precipitation levels, atmospheric humidity, and potential for

deciduous forest development. Above a certain elevation the rising air becomes too dry and cold, and thus discourages tree growth.[6] Although rainfall may not be a significant factors for some mountains, atmospheric humidity or aridity can be more important climatic stresses that affect altitudinal zones.[9] Both overall levels of precipitation and humidity influence soil moisture as well. One of the most important factors that controls the lower boundary of the encinal[clarification needed] or forest level is the ratio of evaporation to soil moisture.[10]

Soil composition

The nutrient content of soils at different altitudes further complicates the demarcation of altitudinal zones. Soils with higher nutrient content, due to higher decomposition rates or greater weathering of rocks, better support larger trees and vegetation. The altitude of better soils varies with the particular mountain being studied. For example, for mountains found in the

Rocky Mountain of the western United States, resulting in thin coarse soils.[11]

Biological forces

In addition to physical forces, biological forces may also produce zonation. For example, a strong competitor can force weaker competitors to higher or lower positions on the elevation gradient.[12] The importance of competition is difficult to assess without experiments, which are expensive and often take many years to complete. However, there is an accumulating body of evidence that competitively dominant plants may seize the preferred locations (that is warmer sites or deeper soils).[13][14] Two other biological factors can influence zonation: grazing and mutualism. The relative importance of these factors is also difficult to assess, but the abundance of grazing animals, and the abundance of mycorrhizal associations, suggests that these elements may influence plant distributions in significant ways.[15]

Solar radiation

Light is another significant factor in the growth of trees and other

arid conditions at higher elevations, shrubs and grasses tend to thrive because of their small leaves and extensive root systems.[17]
However, high elevations also tend to have more frequent cloud cover, which compensates for some of the high intensity radiation.

Massenerhebung effect

The physical characteristics and relative location of the mountain itself must also be considered in predicting altitudinal zonation patterns.[7] The Massenerhebung effect describes variation in the tree line based on mountain size and location. This effect predicts that zonation of rain forests on lower mountains may mirror the zonation expected on high mountains, but the belts occur at lower altitudes.[7] A similar effect is exhibited in the Santa Catalina Mountains of Arizona, where the basal elevation and the total elevation influence the altitude of vertical zones of vegetation.[10]

Other factors

In addition to the factors described above, there are a host of other properties that can confound predictions of altitudinal zonations. These include: frequency of disturbance (such as fire or monsoons), wind velocity, type of rock, topography, nearness to streams or rivers, history of tectonic activity, and latitude.[3][7]

History

Merriam

Altitudinal zonation was first described by C. Hart Merriam in 1889, who used the term life zone to define areas with similar plant and animal communities. Merriam observed that the changes in these communities with an increase in latitude at a constant elevation are similar to the changes seen with an increase in elevation at a constant latitude.[18]

The life zones Merriam identified are most applicable to western North America, being developed on the San Francisco Peaks, Arizona and Cascade Range of the northwestern USA. He tried to develop a system that is applicable across the North American continent, but that system is rarely referred to.

The life zones that Merriam identified, along with characteristic plants, are as follows:

The Canadian and Hudsonian life zones are commonly combined into a Boreal life zone.

This system has been criticized as being too imprecise. For example, the scrub oak chaparral in

western United States. Much more detailed and empirically based classifications of vegetation and life zones now exist for most areas of the world, such as the list of world ecoregions defined by the World Wide Fund for Nature,[19] or the list of North American ecoregions defined by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation.[20]

Holdridge

Main article: Holdridge life zones
Holdridge life zone classification scheme. Although conceived as three-dimensional by its originator, is usually shown as a two-dimensional array of hexagons in a triangular frame.

In 1947, Leslie Holdridge published a life zone classification using indicators of:

  • mean annual
    biotemperature
    (logarithmic)
  • annual precipitation (logarithmic)
  • ratio of annual potential evapotranspiration to mean total annual
    precipitation
    .

Biotemperature refers to all temperatures above freezing, with all temperatures below freezing adjusted to 0 °C, as plants are dormant at these temperatures. Holdridge's system uses biotemperature first, rather than the temperate latitude bias of Merriam's life zones, and does not primarily use elevation. The system is considered more appropriate to the complexities of tropical vegetation than Merriam's system.[21]

At moderate elevations in mountains, the rainfall and temperate climate encourages dense montane forests to grow. Holdridge defines the climate of montane forest as having a biotemperature of between 6 and 12 °C (43 and 54 °F), where biotemperature is the mean temperature considering temperatures below 0 °C (32 °F) to be 0 °C (32 °F).[22] Above the elevation of the montane forest, the trees thin out in the subalpine zone, become twisted krummholz, and eventually fail to grow. The elevation where trees fail to grow is called the tree line. The biotemperature of the subalpine zone is between 3 and 6 °C (37 and 43 °F).[22]

Above the tree line the ecosystem is called the alpine zone or

montane grassland and shrubland
" biome.

Climates with biotemperatures below 1.5 °C (35 °F) tend to consist purely of rock and ice.[22]

Biotic zones in mountains

The details of the altitudinal zonation in mountains depends on the latitude and other local factors.

Montane forests

Waimea Canyon
, Hawaii is known for its montane vegetation.

Montane forests occur around the world. The elevation of these forests varies across the globe, particularly by

whitebark pine.[25]

The lower bound of the montane zone may be a "lower timberline" that separates the montane forest from drier steppe or desert region.[24]

Montane forests differ from lowland forests in the same area.[26] The climate of montane forests is colder than lowland climate at the same latitude, so the montane forests often have species typical of higher-latitude lowland forests.[27] Humans can disturb montane forests through forestry and agriculture.[26] On isolated mountains, montane forests surrounded by treeless dry regions are typical "sky island" ecosystems.[28]

Temperate climate

Pine forest in Abkhazia

Montane forests in temperate climate are typically one of

temperate broadleaf and mixed forest
, forest types that are well known from northern Europe, northern United States, and southern Canada. The trees are, however, often not identical to those found further north: geology and climate causes different related species to occur in montane forests.

Montane forests around the world tend to be more species-rich than those in Europe, because major mountain chains in Europe are oriented east-west, which blocked species migration in the last ice age.

Montane forests in temperate climate occur in Europe (the

Himalaya
.

Mediterranean climate

Montane forests in mediterranean climate are warm and dry except in winter, when they are relatively wet and mild. These forests are typically mixed conifer and broadleaf forests, with only a few conifer species. Pine and Juniper are typical trees found in Mediterranean montane forests. The broadleaf trees show more variety and often evergreen, e.g., evergreen Oak.

This type of forest is found in the

southwestern US, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan
.

Subtropical and tropical climate

Tropical montane forest at around 2,000 m in Malaysia

In the tropics, montane forests can consist of

coniferous forest. One example of a tropical montane forest is a cloud forest, which gains its moisture from clouds and fog.[29] Cloud forests often exhibit an abundance of mosses covering the ground and vegetation, in which case they are also referred to as mossy forests. Mossy forests usually develop on the saddles of mountains, where moisture introduced by settling clouds is more effectively retained.[30] Depending on latitude, the lower limit of montane rainforests on large mountains is generally between 1,500 and 2,500 metres (4,900 and 8,200 ft) while the upper limit is usually from 2,400 to 3,300 metres (7,900 to 10,800 ft).[31]

Subalpine zone

Subalpine Fir in Mount Rainier National Park, Washington
, United States

The subalpine zone is the

subalpine fir
in western North America.

Trees in the subalpine zone often become krummholz, that is, crooked wood, stunted and twisted in form. At tree line, tree seedlings may germinate on the lee side of rocks and grow only as high as the rock provides wind protection. Further growth is more horizontal than vertical, and additional rooting may occur where branches contact the soil. Snow cover may protect krummholz trees during the winter, but branches higher than wind-shelters or snow cover are usually destroyed. Well-established krummholz trees may be several hundred to a thousand years old.[34]

Sierra Nevada of California
, is an example of a subalpine meadow.

Example subalpine zones around the world include the French Prealps in Europe, the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mountain subalpine zones in North America, and subalpine forests in the eastern Himalaya, western Himalaya, and Hengduan mountains of Asia.

Alpine grasslands and tundra

Main articles:
Montane grassland and shrubland, and Alpine plant
Alpine flora near Cascade Pass
An alpine mire in the Swiss Alps

Alpine grasslands and tundra lie above the tree line, in a world of intense radiation, wind, cold, snow, and ice. As a consequence, alpine vegetation is close to the ground and consists mainly of

lichens.[23]

Plants have adapted to the harsh alpine environment.

photosynthesize
at any temperature above 0 °C (32 °F), and the outer fungal layers can absorb more than their own weight in water.

The adaptations for survival of drying winds and cold may make tundra vegetation seem very hardy, but in some respects the tundra is very fragile. Repeated footsteps often destroy tundra plants, leaving exposed soil to blow away, and recovery may take hundreds of years.[36]

Alpine meadows form where sediments from the weathering of rocks has produced soils well-developed enough to support grasses and sedges. Alpine grasslands are common enough around the world to be categorized as a

endemic plants which evolved in response to the cool, wet climate
and abundant sunlight.

The most extensive montane grasslands and shrublands occur in the

Neotropic), Cyathea (New Guinea), and Argyroxiphium (Hawaii
).

Where conditions are drier, one finds montane grasslands, savannas, and woodlands, like the Ethiopian Highlands, and montane steppes, like the steppes of the Tibetan Plateau.

Examples of zonation

See also

References

  1. ^ Fukarek, F; Hempel, I; Hûbel, G; Sukkov, R; Schuster, M (1982). Flora of the Earth (in Russian). Vol. 2. Moscow: Mir. p. 261.
  2. doi:10.1007/BF00038686
    .
  3. ^ a b Daubenmire 1943
  4. ^ Nagy & Grabherr 2009 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFNagyGrabherr2009 (help)
  5. ^ Daubenmire 1943, pp. 345–349
  6. ^ a b Nagy & Grabherr 2009, pp. 30–35 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFNagyGrabherr2009 (help)
  7. ^ a b c d e f Frahm & Gradstein 1991
  8. ^ Daubenmire 1943, pp. 349–352
  9. ^ Stadel 1990
  10. ^ a b Shreve 1922
  11. ^ Daubenmire 1943, p. 355
  12. ^ Keddy, P.A. (2001). Competition (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. p. 552.
  13. JSTOR 1937234
    .
  14. JSTOR 2261523
    .
  15. ^ Keddy, P.A. (2007). Plants and Vegetation: Origins, Processes, Consequences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 666.
  16. ^ Daubenmire 1943, p. 345
  17. ^ Nagy & Grabherr 2009, p. 31 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFNagyGrabherr2009 (help)
  18. ISBN 9780816072293
    .
  19. ^ Ricketts, Taylor H.; Dinerstein, Eric; Olson, David M.; Loucks, Colby J.; et al. (1999). Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: a Conservation Assessment. Washington DC: Island Press.
  20. ^ "Ecological Regions of North America: Toward a Common Perspective" (PDF). Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 1997.
  21. ^ "Holdridge's Life Zones". Geology class notes. Radford University.
  22. ^
    doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00329.x
    .
  23. ^ a b Körner, Christian (2003). Alpine Plant Life: Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems. Berlin: Springer.
  24. ^
    ISBN 9780520058866
    . Retrieved 2012-03-09.
  25. ^ Rundel, P.W.; D. J. Parsons; D. T. Gordon (1977). "Montane and subalpine vegetation of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Ranges". In Barbour, M.G.; Major, J. (eds.). Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York, USA: Wiley. pp. 559–599.
  26. ^ a b Nagy, László; Grabherr, Georg (2009). The biology of alpine habitats. Oxford University Press.
  27. ISBN 0-8018-4987-X
    . Retrieved 2012-03-09.
  28. ISBN 978-0-520-26868-5
    . Retrieved 2012-03-09.
  29. ISBN 978-0-521-76035-5. Retrieved 2012-03-09.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link
    )
  30. ^ Clarke, C.M. (1997). Nepenthes of Borneo. Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications (Borneo). p. 29.
  31. JSTOR 176859
    .
  32. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00032-X. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2012-09-04. Retrieved 2012-03-11. p. 178.
  33. PMID 12324278
    . fig. 1.
  34. ^ "Subalpine ecosystem". Rocky Mountain National Park. U.S. National Park Service.
  35. ^ Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from "Grassland Habitat Group" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-07-24.
  36. ^ a b Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from Rocky Mountain National Park: Alpine Tundra Ecosystem. National Park Service.


Sources

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Montane ecoregions.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Hike395/altitudinal_zonation&oldid=1023708911"