User talk:Ealdgyth/Archive 87

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

• The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
• Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
• Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
• Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
• Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
• Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
• Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
• Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

Administrator changes

Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

Interface administrator changes

Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
• Consensus was found in a previous RfC
  for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.

Technical news

• The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

Arbitration

• The
  discretionary sanctions procedure
  was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
7		Saint Aldate (talk)	Add sources
3,136		Fall of Constantinople (talk)	Add sources
105		Christianisation of Anglo-Saxon England (talk)	Add sources
289		The Getaway (video game) (talk)	Add sources
2,165		Lahore (talk)	Add sources
55		Old Minster, Winchester (talk)	Add sources
38		Richard Scrope (bishop) (talk)	Cleanup
324		Ahmednagar (talk)	Cleanup
541		Baghdad Battery (talk)	Cleanup
9		Vietnamese Americans in Boston (talk)	Expand
334		Top Chess Engine Championship (talk)	Expand
26		Russians in Moldova (talk)	Expand
14		Sibyl de Neufmarché (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
7,735		Portugal (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
720		Rawalpindi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6		The Greatest Hits (1993 Boney M. album) (talk )	Merge
272		Tiger Force (talk)	Merge
225		COVID-19 pandemic in Chhattisgarh (talk)	Merge
4		Draco Normannicus (talk)	Wikify
8		History of independent Moldova (talk)	Wikify
15		Capitoul (talk)	Wikify
3		3-hydroxydecanoyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) dehydratase (talk)	Orphan
2		Andrei Yevdokhin (talk)	Orphan
3		Anthony Emeka (talk)	Orphan
19		Godgifu (daughter of Æthelred the Unready) (talk)	Stub
12		Nativity Cathedral, Chișinău (talk)	Stub
290		Udayanraje Bhosale (talk)	Stub
9		Paul Ferguson (bishop) (talk)	Stub
6		Hakon Sweynson (talk)	Stub
4		Brendan Rhim (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ealdgyth, just a quick note that Wulfstan (died 1023) has an open GAR at Talk:Wulfstan (died 1023)/GA1. Best, CMD (talk) 17:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

I dropped a note there, but am not watching the GAR page. I just don't have access to the sources I'd need nor any desire to acquire them or interest in that aspect of history. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

No problem, just thought I'd let you know as you were the original GA nominee, back in deep time. Best, CMD (talk) 17:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Good evening Ealdgyth,

I hope you are enjoying everything the month of May has to offer you. I took a look at the revision history for Lithuanian Crusade and I noticed you removed all the coats of arms from the infobox with the edit summary, "remove coats of arms, other unrecognizable icons that are utterly unlikely to be known to most readers." I was curious about this, and I took a look at your contribs and noticed you have done this to at least a few other articles.

You seem to be an established editor on Wikipedia, so I am certain that you have not done this for light and transient reasons. I just wanted to ask if you could expound on the reasoning that certain things like icons should not belong on Wikipedia on the basis of being unknown to most readers. By the same reasoning, I might be able to argue that we should just remove the names of the belligerents altogether because they're unlikely to be known by most readers. (And also, who are "most readers," anyway?) I think you might make many editors upset with you, especially those in WikiProject Military History. I know they consider details like that when they assess articles for their project.

From purely a style standpoint, the Manual of Style gives us an explicit exception to the general recommendation against flag icons in the context of a military conflict. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons#Avoid flag icons in infoboxes says, "Examples of acceptable exceptions include infobox templates for military conflicts and infoboxes including international competitions, such as FIFA World Cup or the Olympic Games."

I would also say that if someone reading Wikipedia were specifically focused on studying the crusades and other military conflicts from around that time, they might recognize the icons from article to article and appreciate that they were there. Or someone who just happened upon the article might be entertained by them, or be inspired to look up heraldry and the history of national iconography. There is value to them. I believe that if we were to ask for community consensus about whether to keep them, the community would agree with me. But I would like to know what you think.

Have a lovely day,

Well, the community was asked about them and pretty decisively decided that coats of arms are not helpful. See the closure of the RfC (courtesy link to the full discussion: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons#Close the coats-of-arms loophole). Ealdgyth (talk) 23:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Ealdgyth, I want to thank you for replying so quickly and kindly. I was unaware of that conversation. When I read the new style, I at first was caught up on the "of a person" part, failing to remember that all coats of arms are literally personal, not national. The tone of that discussion was mildly upsetting (haha) and I'm sorry I reopened that wound on your talk page. Thank you for your help, and have a good night!

talk

) 00:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ealdgyth, hope you're doing well. A few days ago I opened a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources about the use of Dot Esports and InvenGlobal, two websites you deemed not reliable enough for an FA during your review of League of Legends. Would you be so kind as to expand on your reasoning at the discussion? It would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Anarchyte (talk) 08:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey Ealdgyth, whenever you have the chance I'd love an outside eye at Power Mac G4 Cube's sources. I'm not taking it to FAC very soon (too much other stuff going on) but it'd be great to get a set of eyes on it before then as I have a a few sources I'd want a second opinion on. Hope things are well in your part of the world. Cheers, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 18:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey David (and this is directed at @Anarchyte: too).. I'm insanely busy with outside-wiki stuff and I'm not sure when I'm going to be free ... it may not be til next winter depending on a lot of stuff. So I can't promise anything, sorry! Ealdgyth (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

No problem. Best of luck with the outside-wiki stuff :) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 22:57, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the

Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T)

23:35, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
194		Peachtree City, Georgia (talk)	Add sources
268		Eighth Crusade (talk)	Add sources
246		Louis II of Italy (talk)	Add sources
1,088		People's Crusade (talk)	Add sources
776		Kola nut (talk)	Add sources
13		Cultural depictions of William the Conqueror (talk)	Add sources
58		Second Swedish Crusade (talk)	Cleanup
1,722		Normans (talk)	Cleanup
414		Battle of Nicopolis (talk)	Cleanup
302		Invasions of the British Isles (talk)	Expand
1,441		Turkish Armed Forces (talk)	Expand
398		Southern Christian Leadership Conference (talk)	Expand
150		Housing in the United Kingdom (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
672		Crown of Aragon (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
37		McWane (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
9		Warmians (talk)	Merge
1,336		Nāga (talk)	Merge
6		Bishopric of Turku (talk )	Merge
9		Remigius de Fécamp (talk)	Wikify
1,066		Selma to Montgomery marches (talk)	Wikify
34		Spanish chivalry (talk)	Wikify
132		Nando Moura (talk)	Orphan
3		Humanist Counseling in the Dutch Armed Forces (talk)	Orphan
3		McCree Harris (talk)	Orphan
11		Welche (talk)	Stub
11		Michael Clanchy (talk)	Stub
8		Compacts of Basel (talk)	Stub
37		Third Swedish Crusade (talk)	Stub
6		David C. Douglas (talk)	Stub
7		Council of Lillebonne (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, just wondering why your recent contributions history is purging flagicons from city articles while citing them with

It's pretty clear that the MOS discourages flagicons in infoboxes. The "may" does not mean they should be there - the overriding "they could be unnecessarily distracting and might give undue prominence to one field among many" is clear that it should be followed. I can't say that I see any reason that infoboxes on cities/states/regions should have flags - the linked article title is much better. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

The "may" also states that they don't necesarily need to be purged, the flags are too small to be any distrcations and provide more familiarity and recognizability so it pops out to a common reader and even some templates have both flag and linking. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. It was the first article I worked on for a GA nomination. I do see now, after working on a few other GAs, that there are many things which can be improved there. I will keep at it. I hear you; even my real life has been strangely hectic of late. I hope it gets easier for both of us. Until then, I hope this beer helps a bit. — The Most Comfortable Chair 03:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello Ealdgyth! I would love to have a discussion with you about Medieval England, specifically the Anglo-Norman period. You are very knowledgeable on this topic and I have selected you to be my oracle. I need your help in determining if I am a descendant of one of these royal retards. I am not a smart man and don't know how to use this computer machine website so please send me an email at [email protected] or text me 208 827 6810 Malortuni33 (talk) 06:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

Administrator changes

Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless

Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)

Guideline and policy news

• Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
• Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.

Technical news

• Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

Arbitration

• After a
  Reliable Sources Noticeboard
  to discuss disputed sources.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
913		Mythic humanoids (talk)	Add sources
2,372		Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse (talk)	Add sources
9		Library Network of Western Switzerland (talk)	Add sources
75		Peter II of Aragon (talk)	Add sources
215		Battle on the Ice (talk)	Add sources
9,653		Friday Night Funkin' (talk)	Add sources
27		Holocaust studies (talk)	Cleanup
6		Ælfric Puttoc (talk)	Cleanup
64		Health in the United States (talk)	Cleanup
1,381		Chimera (mythology) (talk)	Expand
6,765		Joey King (talk)	Expand
689		Religion in the Philippines (talk)	Expand
49		Mud wrestling (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
86		Religion in Colombia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
387		Horse breeding (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
141		United States Holocaust Memorial Museum shooting (talk)	Merge
19		Dutch Loango-Angola (talk)	Merge
83		Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers (talk )	Merge
143		Columbanus (talk)	Wikify
102		Christianity in the ante-Nicene period (talk)	Wikify
49		Vampires in popular culture (talk)	Wikify
3		Canterbury election of 1205 (talk)	Orphan
236		Anthony Youn (talk)	Orphan
3		Akiko Fukai (talk)	Orphan
417		House of Normandy (talk)	Stub
5		Charlie Beech (talk)	Stub
18		Kolfe Keranio (talk)	Stub
47		Cecilia of Normandy (talk)	Stub
15		Muhammad IX of Granada (talk)	Stub
13		Yawar Waqaq (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ealdgyth. I agree with keep the section trim, but replacing Nedic’s regime and Zbor with just “local” would leave readers with no context of who participated with the Germans. It’s pretty significant collab. I was surprised by that. For example the Ustase are mention specifically in their role in the Holocaust (obviously with greater autonomy). OyMosby (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

This belongs on the article talk page - where others can weigh in. Obviously, I think it's too much detail, lets see what others think. Please take this to the talk page of the article. User talk pages are best used for discussions of user behavior, not content being actively discussed. Ealdgyth (talk) 12:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thought I would consult with you since it was in relation to an edit of yours. Overall all your other edits seem fine to me. OyMosby (talk) 12:49, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

I guess I'm glad it was created, but needs massive cleanup and a copyvio check: Janus (horse). I moved it to a decent title, tagged it for the project and took a very brief whack at a copyedit, but it's beyond what I've got the time, knowledge and energy to tackle. Pinging a couple people who can help. Montanabw^(talk) 17:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
580		Wars of Scottish Independence (talk)	Add sources
470		Akhal-Teke (talk)	Add sources
9		Battle of Moiry Pass (talk)	Add sources
55		talk )	Add sources
16		Battle of Connor (talk)	Add sources
576		Asunción (talk)	Add sources
2		Isabella S. Davis Spurlock (talk)	Cleanup
321		Robert de Brus, 6th Lord of Annandale (talk)	Cleanup
572		Bill Robinson (talk)	Cleanup
4,774		Braveheart (talk)	Expand
238		Anglo-Scottish Wars (talk)	Expand
14		Liechtenstein Homeland Service (talk)	Expand
131		Lord of the Isles (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
50		William the Hardy, Lord of Douglas (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
90		Early timeline of Nazism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
35,351		Google (talk)	Merge
65		Origins of Rabbinic Judaism (talk )	Merge
172		Medici Chapel (talk)	Merge
100		Becket controversy (talk)	Wikify
1,079		Richard B. Spencer (talk)	Wikify
19		Christianity in Gaul (talk)	Wikify
3		Allen Bukoff (talk)	Orphan
2		Alyaksandr Buloychyk (talk)	Orphan
2		Andre Lodemann (talk)	Orphan
12		Battle of Skaithmuir (talk)	Stub
22		Worcester News (talk)	Stub
29		Ingram de Umfraville (talk)	Stub
15		New Zealand grayling (talk)	Stub
169		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
4		1306 in Scotland (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:43, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

• The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
• Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
• Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
• Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
• Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
• BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

Administrator changes Trialpears AGK • Eliz81 • Mulad • ThaddeusB • Vianello • Who Lacrimosus → Ikuzaf Interface administrator changes Ragesoss

CheckUser changes AGK • DGG Oversighter changes AGK

Guideline and policy news

• WP:REFUND
  even after the namespace is removed.
• An
  TFAs
  .

Technical news

• IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

Arbitration

• The community authorised
  COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion
  at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
204		John Comyn III of Badenoch (talk)	Add sources
6,570		Democratic Republic of the Congo (talk)	Add sources
9		Stanley Clinton-Davis, Baron Clinton-Davis (talk)	Add sources
146		James FitzJames, 1st Duke of Berwick (talk)	Add sources
81		Treaty of Edinburgh–Northampton (talk)	Add sources
21		John Comyn, Earl of Buchan (talk)	Add sources
304		talk )	Cleanup
14		Patrick V, Earl of March (talk)	Cleanup
73		William Douglas, 1st Earl of Douglas (talk)	Cleanup
10		Cape May City School District (talk)	Expand
122		Creative Cities Network (talk)	Expand
313		Auburn Tigers football (talk)	Expand
87		Heathen holidays (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
33		Lorne, Scotland (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
66		Berkeley family (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
116		University of Colombo (talk)	Merge
74		Ignition SCADA (talk)	Merge
39		Hopland, California (talk)	Merge
53		Peter Chanel (talk)	Wikify
364		Race and sexuality (talk)	Wikify
9		Stobo Kirk (talk)	Wikify
2		Adrienne d'Aulnis de Bourouill (talk)	Orphan
3		Ann Pratt (talk)	Orphan
2		Ademar Agostinho Sauthier (talk)	Orphan
19		Thomas de Brus (talk)	Stub
24		Alexander de Brus (talk)	Stub
3		Madhosinghana (talk)	Stub
77		Chrysops relictus (talk)	Stub
16		Milites (talk)	Stub
4		Malcolm MacQuillan (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:37, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I notice that you have ended up in a discussion with the Swedish user Dan Koehl. FYI, he has recently been blocked for a three year period from Swedish WP, because of his beaviour. Discussing with him has proved fruitless. A blocking at the English Wikipedia would do you and everybody else good. Regards, Jobbaren (talk) 14:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)