User talk:JRRobinson

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

Hi. Please note that you added at least once (see Terry Bush) Category:Place of birth missing in a non-talk page. This category must be placed only in talk pages. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 17:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I want to underline that you did that again. Check this edit. Category:Place of birth missing must be placed only in talk pages. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk)

Hi there. You wrote this article about Tompkin some time ago - but had no deathdate attached to him. According to Cricket Archive, Maurice Tompkin died in 1956. See here.

Hi there. Just to let you know, when updating football players' league appearances, you can use five tilde characters (~) in the pcupdate and ntupdate fields to give the correct date updates. Peanut4 (talk) 22:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC) That's OK, my friend, shame you're a

Hi, a friend of mine is writing a biography of his father, Alfred Brookes Sharman. Sharman played for Town in the 20s, but possibly only in the reserves. I wonder if you would check your record books to see if you can find any trace, please? If it turns out that he got a first team game then I can do a WP page, of course. Smile a While (talk) 23:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that my sources have no record of an "Alfred Brookes Sharman" playing in the first team, because I was so busy over Christmas 2007 and the New Year 2008 putting up the record of every player who played in Town's first team, but I just double-checked to make sure I didn't overlook him. Does that mean you don't own a copy of 99 Years & Counting, the Town book? Do you not live in this country? JRRobinson (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking. Smile a While (talk) 01:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Adam Wilson (footballer), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Wilson (footballer). Thank you. - RD ^(Talk) 21:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, noticed your change to his year of birth. My Birmingham sources say 1902, but Joyce's Football League Player Records has 1901, so I'm happy to go with the majority, at least until someone comes up with his birth certificate to prove it one way or the other :-) cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note to let you know that dates are no longer linked. Peanut4 (talk) 20:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just another quick reminder. See

MOS:UNLINKDATES. Thanks. Peanut4 (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

That seems slightly silly, it's as harmless as harmlessness. JRRobinson (talk) 21:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't make the rules. I'm just pointing out that it's no longer seen as necessary to link dates. Peanut4 (talk) 21:15, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remember you can use five tilde (~) characters in the date fields when you update the statistics. Peanut4 (talk) 00:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, noticed you'd added Kettering apps to the infobox and was wondering if you were sure that figure was just league apps? I know this gives 47 apps, but if he was only there for that one season, that must be all competitions, they only played 42 in the Southern League. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. In line with other clubs' templates, I have split the list of seasons out of {{

On second thought, why don't I just request that bot do it? In fact, if I got a bot to do it, I could also get the hyphens in the article titles changed to endashes, thereby killing two birds with the metaphorical solitary stone. That OK with you? –

Jay 22:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

That's a very good idea man! You get the thumbs up from me. JRRobinson (talk) 22:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On January 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jack Wheeler, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 11:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can I once again please remind you not to link dates. See

You clearly still haven't read the guidelines. Please stop linking dates quite unnecessarily. Peanut4 (talk) 21:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just pointing out this notice again as I saw you did on a few articles, would be helpful if you stopped linking dates. Cheers, --Jimbo^[online] 10:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JRR, more than happy to make you a graph. I think I have all of the data I need for clubs in the English League. I'll try and make one this weekend for you - if you email me at [email protected] I'll send you a first draft.--Payo (talk) 14:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huddersfield Town F.C. page but you better check that it is in a good place. Let me know if you want anything changed - slightly worried that the blue isn't light enough. Anyway Sorry about the delay! :-) --Payo (talk) 17:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi there. I was looking through a list of articles, checking stuff, and I noticed this. The birth date you put there is 1960, but the article says 1889. Did you mean to put the date of death? If not, it'll just need correcting, but if it is the year of death then the article needs a bit of tidying (add and removing the related categories). Carcharoth (talk) 17:36, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Andy Jeffery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No record here or here of him ever having played. No info on google. Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

I can only assume you keep changing the date format and bolding the inverted commas in his name on purpose, and for that you must have a reason. Therefore, my only question is: what is the reason for you to make these changes? The inverted commas are not part of his name, so I see no reason for them to be bolded, and the guy is English, so it makes perfect sense for the date format used in the article to be the international format (DD MMM YYYY) and not the nonsensical American format (MMM DD, YYYY). –

Please don't ignore my messages. Thanks. –

Jay 20:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

You may prefer a certain method, but since Drinkwater is British, we should stick to the British date format in his article. Furthermore, I was originally told by another editor (possibly

Jay 21:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I have tidied up the Seasons page for you and HTFC fans. Mr Hall of England (talk) 20:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am still waiting for you to reply. Mr Hall of England (talk) 20:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The matches on wiki

• 1920 FA Cup Final
• 1922 FA Cup Final
• 1922 FA Charity Shield
• 1928 FA Cup Final
• 1930 FA Cup Final
• 1938 FA Cup Final
• 1994 Football League Trophy Final
• 2004 Football League Third Division play-off Final

Also I need to know the positions, captians and runs to final. Mr Hall of England (talk) 14:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mitchell Bailey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails

WP:ATHLETE

by never having played at fully-pro level

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

Could you help me wiht the numbering of the line-ups of both teams please so I can do it. Mr Hall of England (talk) 20:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me with the numbering of the 1994 Autoglass Trophy Final please because I have put the line-ups on and I want you to sort them out and could you sort out any of the other HTFC matches please because I am not sure if they are right. Mr Hall of England (talk) 18:23, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Huddersfield Town F.C. - The Fans' Favourites has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book - fails

WP:BK

, as well as being a potential copyvio.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

It may not have been your intention, but you recently reverted an apparently constructive edit on Are You an Egghead?. Please be careful not to undo the efforts of others to improve the article without a good reason, which should be stated in the edit summary. Thank you. -- Smjg (talk) 10:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again. Please, either give your reason for reinstating the unfilled sections, or don't do it. -- Smjg (talk) 12:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is that they don't need to be hidden. There is no reason for them to be hidden. It's just pointless. JRRobinson (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Jon Worthington - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Martyn Booty - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Kenny Irons (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Paul Dalton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Gianfranco Labarthe Tome - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Luke Malcher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Les Massie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Jimmy McGill - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. David Cowling - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Brian Stanton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, have you seen references to this player being known as 'Bob', as I hadn't, and thus added him as a redlink at

Hello, interestingly, I haven't so moving it to

Robert Jones (footballer born 1902) doesn't seem a bad idea. JRRobinson (talk) 20:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi there. I've got some more information on this guy, and am about to add what is not contradictory. But there are a couple of inconsistencies.

According to my source he was born on 29 January 1890. He was born in King's Lynn, so surely it's got to be the same guy. As it's 29/1 vs 21/9, I was just wondering if you could double check the Huddersfield source? It also gives a quite long list of other clubs he played for (which I will add), but makes no mention of the Northern Nomads. I'm reasonably confident that he didn't play for them before he left Watford, because it states that he played for Watford and District schools. Should I move them to the bottom of the infobox, as he's more likely to have played for them after retirement? Regards, WFCforLife (talk) 18:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, forgot to mention, it also claims that left Watford for Huddersfield in May 1910, which contradicts the infobox. WFCforLife (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my source says he joined Huddersfield from the Northern Nomads, where he played as an amateur in April 1910, and it also gives his DOB as 21/09/1890. So, I'm not sure what to make of it. Sorry. JRRobinson (talk) 19:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luke Malcher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who hasn't played in professional football. Doesn't meet

WP:ATHLETE

guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why ?????? Liamtaylor007 (talk) 08:27, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced

The article

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

• DGG ( talk ) 16:11, 22 August 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hi, I am trying to clear all the unreferenced BLPs from the category: People from Burnley and this is the last one. Unfortunately I can find absolutely nothing about Mr Harrison outside of Wikipedia. Any chance you could shed some light of where this info came from? --Trappedinburnley (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notify author/project: ==Proposed deletion of Sandy Mutch==

The article Sandy Mutch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find published (gBook) support for this subject winning the

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:20, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for this edit but there are a few things I've noticed - firstly, please provde a

The article Rennie Harrison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is unreferenced (so claim to notability is unverified) and has been for over 4 years

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 12:05, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Room 101 episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Square (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Room 101 episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cinema and Talking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a recent contributor to List of Friends episodes you are invited to a discussion at Talk:List of Friends episodes#Disputed changes, which is discussing recent changes that involve replacement of transclusion with custom tables. Thank you. --AussieLegend (talk) 01:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Have I Got News for You episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Richard Bacon

Simon Grayson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Manager of the Month

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please let me know which source you've used to

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Atkinson (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red card (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dancing with the Stars (New Zealand TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Sticks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Clemmit, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David James, Npower and Carlsberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just a thought, might save yourself a bit of work. We're actually advised against "fixing" redirects that aren't broken, as set out

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Caribbean International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartagena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you created Horace Husler, way back - in 2007! I've been collecting pre ww1 Donny players for a list, and found this. I'm almost certain I found his birth year and death year on searches, and with that the correct spelling of his surname (there's only one Horace H Husler - as the song would go).

In the article it says he's a midfielder in the body but a keeper elsewhere - guessing you were using a template that had midfielder in it?! Anyway, would be great if you have confirmation of his position, and anything else about him. Cjwilky (talk) 15:44, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bradford City stadium fire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rachel Riley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cambrian Airways (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to

Birmingham International Airport

Ireland West Airport Knock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to

Birmingham International Airport

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duane Holmes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (state) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Damien Brennan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NFOOTY

. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 10:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC) JMHamo (talk) 10:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when updating infobox stats you need to update the |pcupdate= or |club-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Cheers, 17:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you make sure you update the career statistics table when updating the infobox? Thanks, GiantSnowman 09:58, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

C'mon, that was clearly a typo (putting "20" instead of "10") - and please remember to update the date in the career statistics table when updating as well. Thanks, GiantSnowman 10:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joe Lolley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Please make sure you source all of your edits, and please do not lift direct passages of text out of the sources you do use. For example, the entire part about his pre-Kidderminster days was lifted straight out of the Huddersfield press release on his signing. Thank you. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:44, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:COPYVIO is taken very seriously on Wikipedia, please take more care in future. GiantSnowman 13:28, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Room 101 episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electorate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Room 101 episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cinema and Catalogues (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Room 101 episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newsreader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Nicholls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Alderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have noticed that on two occasions now I have had to undo your edit and re-do it due to you not adding official match reports to results. The report is a reference that you did NOT make up the result, scorers, goal time, attendance etc. In future please wait until match report is available before making your edit. Cheers Skyblueshaun (talk) 22:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, years ago you created Willie Rogers (footballer), but there are no dates or references to verify anything. Any chance you could return to where you got the info and provide at least a date of when he played, or preferably a reference. Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 12:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the same player? If so, perhaps it you could use it, combined with whatever source you used to create the page, to flesh out the article. Thanks. Eagleash (talk) 16:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 2015 BDO World Darts Championship without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ... discospinster _talk 00:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Ishmael Miller, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 20:19, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you're aware of this but someone is trying to get the QI article deleted, and I can see that you provided a significant input into it. If this one goes then I'm guessing that so will all the rest.ChicXulub (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Huddersfield Town A.F.C., as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". You have been warned about this before!! JMHamo (talk) 14:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JMHamo (talk)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

As people have told you up above, you absolutely must use edit summaries, and most of your edits should not be marked as minor. Please follow the links to the edit-summary and minor-edit help pages that others have given you in previous messages, and please begin using summaries and not marking all your edits as minor. When you've read these help pages, please request unblock, using a rationale somewhat like "I've read the pages I was told to read", since this block is simply meant as an attention-getter: it's not normally a good reason for unblock, but I doubt any admin would reject it when you're just following instructions. Nyttend (talk) 13:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

JRRobinson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Having now read this particular bit of the guide, "Consequently, if you are in doubt about whether an edit is minor or not, it is always safer not to mark it as minor.", I do understand the reason for blocking me, but it's not a thing people read straight away, and I'd have thought being safer would be making it minor. The little bits I do are literally what I'd call "minor", even if it involves changing little bits of information, so the reason I've been doing it, is because in my mind, doing something like that is "minor", and not necessary of an edit summary, especially when you can just look at what I have edited on the history page.

Accept reason:

JRRobinson, I've unblocked your account, but please do be more careful with these things. It's not enough to say "go look at the change", because that's what the summary and edit type (minor/major) are for. We certainly don't like using blocks to force editors to communicate and respond to concerns, but that's a discussion for another venue. And thank you for all your contributions. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:20, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JRRobinson, I sincerely hope that the incident that has happened here will not affect your editing here in any negative respect. As a project, you should have been treated with more care and respect and instead were kicked to the curb. I am deeply sorry this happened. Editors should never be treated in the way you were. Vandals are very frequently treated with far more deference than the manner in which you were treated. To go from requests to a week long block which would only be waived if you agreed to the terms you were faced with was nothing short of going from peace and tranquility to being held at wiki-gunpoint with a hand on your throat. The issue of edit summaries was real, and needed to be addressed in a manner to convey something other than requests to use them. What happened was wrong on many levels. I sincerely hope you will not take what happened as being reflective of how we operate, reflective of how you can expect to be treated in the future, nor reflective of your excellent contributions to the project. I believe it is an aberration, and one which I hope will not be repeated. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that Hammersoft, I did never intend to do anything wrong, it was just the way interpreted it.JRRobinson (talk) 16:21, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, May I ask what you mean by the full lot. I did the match details. Skyblueshaun (talk) 18:41, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No yellow cards, no appearance details, no next game. Plenty missing..... JRRobinson (talk) 18:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JRRobinson. I wonder could you explain to me why you think Manchester were definitely eliminated in their match against York on 3 August, while all of the other four losing teams have not been? You reverted my edit, but you did not leave any edit summary in answer to my own edit summary question. I have watched the episode again on iPlayer, but I don't see any clues. Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, as they had the lowest score of the five losers so far, they can't play for the remainiung two "highest loser" places. So the rules mean they must be eliminated. But this was not announced by Paxman. Does he have any discretion here, or are eliminated teams always routinely announced? Might it be fairer to wait until all first round matches are completed before showing eliminations? Not that Wikipedia has any remit to be "fair", of course. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paxman never announces when past teams have been eliminated on the show, only if the team that has lost on the current show with a score that has already got a score lower than the threshold. So, since Manchester have the lowest score so far of the 5 losers, they're gone. JRRobinson (talk) 12:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I can see what you're saying, thanks. If the Manchester match, with that result, had happened last night, Paxman would have announced their departure. My only qualm is that there is no official source for Manchester's elimination i.e. I can't find any BBC results page. So we are applying the rules in a

WP:OR manner? Maybe nobody cares. lol. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

So any team that gets less than 120110 will be eliminated. If another team gets more than 120, Swansea will be eliminated. The cut-off score will very probably change as the contest progesses. Not sure what happens if another team gets 120110? Is this covered somewhere in the rules? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, less than 110, since that's Swansea's score. If the losing score is also 110, then leave it as it until it's confirmed beyond doubt. I'm not sure what the criteria is regarding a tie, cos last year, the 4th spot was actually a tie between LSE and Exeter, and we never found out why LSE got the nod over Exeter..... JRRobinson (talk) 18:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I meant 110, sorry. Indeed, why did LSE go through? Was it on the total of questions they got wrong? If another team gets 110, it will seem unfair to leave Swansea as eliminated and the new team as not? I suppose "confirmed beyond doubt" would be an announcement by Paxman.Martinevans123 (talk) 19:08, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I don't know. That rule was used in the early Paxman era, so I wouldn't be surprised if that was the same..... JRRobinson (talk) 19:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We'll just have to see what happens. Thanks, anyway. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Crystal Maze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King's Cross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simon Stevenson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Premier League Darts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alastair Biggar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Five Nations. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nine-dart finish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Mason. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Copa_Am%C3%A9rica_Centenario&diff=725091976&oldid=725084608 This was not a minor edit, and it does go against

Hi Jr how are ?. I am just writing to ask would you be able to create a homepage for all the world series of Darts Events ?. There are none available at the moment. Regards Ronnie79 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.200.148.202 (talk) 16:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yeah, I've been meaning to do one, it's long overdue. JRRobinson (talk) 07:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers JR will you be doing a page for each event ?. Ronnie79 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.200.176.162 (talk) 20:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not liable to edit the whole page, A user is aloud to edit a single section if their do it correctly and have the proper sourced material to do so. --Skyblueshaun (talk) 07:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, When you add match results would you be able to add a link to a report please? Thanks --SuperJew (talk) 19:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of A League of Their Own episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bishop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought I would send out a message to prominent editors who work upon the articles that cover each Series of the The Apprentice (UK). I have begun to start wondering if we, as editors, are doing the right thing by writing out these articles in a manner that seems to be not encyclopedic as they should be in regards to the general principle of Wikipedia. I state this because, over all of the Series that have been done, all information on each episode that has been broadcast, editors write out the Episodes in term of detailing a general review of a task, the setup of teams, who won and who lost, the reward provided, who was fired and why, and noting down notable events and such like associated to the episode.

Now, when QI's main article was made, editors decided to cover each Series by writing out everything that was discussed as an answer to a question, as if it was a fact of importance; even I was one such editor who did this. Eventually, a Wikipedian finally decided to end this by deleting the pages and just ensuring that the episodes were listed in terms of their number, title, the guests on it and who won that episode, and the Air Date it was first broadcast on (including QI XL).

The fact is, I believe that this is happening again in regards to this show, in that any Wikipedian who comes to the articles in each Series, are generally writing out information that appears to make the site appear more like a Blog, than an online encyclopedia. I fear that unless action is taken now to discuss what should be going into these articles, someone may come along and decide it may be necessary to delete these pages. I have started a discussion on this matter, over on the

I hope that by discussing the matter, we can generally determine what action should be taken on this issue. Please take time to consider this, when you can, and do pass this on to any Wikipedian that you know, has been editing these articles alongside yourself. Thank you for reading this. GUtt01 (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Gladiators 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Halliday. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Reg Swinfen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable w/o RS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JR how are you ?. I do editing on Snooker, Tennis and Darts. I want to add Runners-up finishes to each players wiki pages like we have in Snooker and Tennis. A complete list of finals. For example let's say Gary Anderson has played 90 Career Finals. He has 60 tiles and 30 Runners-up finishes I want to state this on the page to match other sports that I have mentioned. We have a complete record of all players past results on Darts Database so getting all the results is no problem as we have a great source. Let me know your thoughts please ?. Regards 31.200.177.241 (talk) 21:34, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It certainly sounds like a great idea. Definitely got no problems with that.JRRobinson (talk) 11:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK JR talk to me my man how will me go about doing it ?. I reckon if we start with the current big-names MVG, Taylor, Anderson , Lewis, Wade and Barney. They have won the most and been in the most Finals. After that it should be quite a lot easier What you reckon. It's long overdue anyway ?. Let me know, regards 92.251.170.253 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think ? 92.251.186.7 (talk) 19:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You never got back to me on the Darts project JR ?31.200.181.157 (talk) 17:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry about that. Have been away and out of contact with here.

Yeah, it seems like a brilliant idea, although I thought some of them already had this sort of information on their pages, unless you mean doing something very different. Show me one for a starter, and I'll see if it looks good. JRRobinson (talk) 10:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They only have majors I'm on about all career finals including PDC Pro Tour and European Tour Events. I'll have a go in the next week or so keep an eye on this page I'll message you prior to doing it 178.167.189.126 (talk) 01:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can you explain to one editor that the above is not a Major TV event. It is a regular event just like the regular World Series events. It has not carried major status since its inception but he seems to think it carries major status this year. The PDC or darts Database do not include it as a Major. Can you have a word please ?. 178.167.164.191 (talk) 00:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Regards[reply]

Jr can you reply when you get this. I'm having a problem with the above event on here ok 31.200.183.195 (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't classify the WSoD Finals as a major, they're sort of a specialist event, in a way like what the Grand Slam used to be, before that became a ranking major a couple of years ago. JRRobinson (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't and neither do statisticians they count it like regular WSOD events, but one editor on here keeps changing it to a major I have to keep changing it back, will you send him a message about it please ? 178.167.205.14 (talk) 18:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, will do. JRRobinson (talk) 18:42, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JR some editors are adding this as a major will you tell them not to please ?. 31.200.142.239 (talk) 23:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Steve McNally (darts player), JRRobinson!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work on these new Darts articles. It would be good to have better references than just a player listing at a darts database. Have a search and see if there are any news articles (even local ones), etc that can support each article. These players probably classify for subject specific notability criteria, but is better for their long term survival if they can unambiguously meet

WP:GNG

as well. CHeers and keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about

— InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{(or here)} 21:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On here people are beginning to piss me off. They keep changing the status to major when it's not. Will you sort ghis out please 92.251.169.183 (talk) 16:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. JRRobinson (talk) 16:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They keep changing it how will you have a word ? 92.251.169.183 (talk) 16:57, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's very hard. Clearly, they seem to thing that ANY televised tournament constitutes as a major, which I can understand I suppose.... Maybe we're fighting a losing battle here... JRRobinson (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No we are not the Darts commentators on ITV do not count the WSODF as a major just a regular tv event. Can we sort this out ?. 31.200.191.129 (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the PDC Order of Merit Rules. Rule 2.1 unambiguously states that the World Series of Darts Finals is a Premier Invitational Event, distinct from the World Series, which comes under "Other Events". Unless you have a reliable source that says that the PDC is incorrect in listing its own rules, can I ask why you are constantly removing it from the template. OZOO (t) (c) 09:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because it has not been regarding by the PDC as a Tv Major in any other year so why now , it has not been called a major by broadcasters and Darts statisticians who have regarding it as a WSOD TV event. Maybe they have just included in there as it is on TV I don't know. MVG'S previous WSODF wins have been counted on no sites as majors. Check the stats for yourself I compile data. 178.167.199.106 (talk) 01:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please use AT LEAST two sources for EVERY article you create, especially those on living people. And do not just list a darts website as an external link- use it as a citation and include a footnote. If you have any questions let me know. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 23:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave the full name in like in all other sports ?. Regards 178.167.134.49 (talk) 15:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because if you look at the past editions of the event, after round 1, just the surnames are left because it squeezes up on smaller computers. It's a tradition that has stayed on for ages. JRRobinson (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not right and should be changed. In Snooker and Tennis full names are used it should be the same in darts do you not agree ?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.167.134.49 (talk) 15:52, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In all the other tournaments, it's fine, the problem with the Worlds is that it has 64 players, so there are 6 "columns", so if they were all full names, it would be a big squish to look at for some people. It works perfectly on the European Tour events, which also has 6 rounds, like the Worlds. I personally think it's fine as it is for the Worlds with the shortening after R1, but for others tournaments, as there's more space, it's more viable to do it with the full name. JRRobinson (talk) 15:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The European Tour are Mickey mouse events. It does not look right at all having just the surnames for the World championships lets leave the full names in it looks fine to me ?. Nowrap would keep the names on one line if need be ok ?. I'm the guy who was in touch with you about keeping the WSODF as a minor event not a major. I edit lots of events on here also 178.167.134.49 (talk) 23:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to show you a screen grab showing the problem with keeping the Christian names right now for a computer my size, which is nothing to do with the idea of being against the idea, but it looks awful now, so I'm getting rid, and keeping it in line with the others. JRRobinson (talk) 13:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, all articles need sources clearly given, and for biographies of living people, these need to be clearly

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 22:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Communication is required. Can you please respond to my messages? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 21:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring messages from other editors is not an option on Wikipedia - it is a collaborative project. Please respond. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for ignoring them, that page wasn't high on my priority list, sorted now. JRRobinson (talk) 23:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Boleyn (talk) 08:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Now that it's been deleted again, if you want to re-create this article, I would do so at
  WP:G4 will continue to apply. Iffy★Chat -- 22:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. JRRobinson, thanks for creating Ümit Uygunsözlü!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 1 issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 12:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Richard North (darts player) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard North (darts player) .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks,

Jbh ^Talk 05:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fabian Herz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable darts player. There is no SNG for darts, but a person who is currently ranked #1548 would probably not meet one if it existed. No non-database coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

The article Marc Dewsbury has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable darts player. There is no SNG for darts, but a person with a peak ranking in the 300s would probably not meet one if it existed. No non-database coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Hi, I'm Dan Koehl. JRRobinson, thanks for creating Harith Lim!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Dan Koehl (talk) 11:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 PDC Calendar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Ward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JRRobinson, I have reinserting the reference which you have deleted. Please keep the source intact when you minor tweak the wording so the content could be verified. Thank you.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 PDC Calendar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Borland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am currently watching the new pages feed and I keep seeing you make mostly blank articles about sports events that will not happen for months, it is my understanding that unfinished articles should be titled as drafts.

Draft:2018 Brisbane Darts Masters

.

You can move drafts to become articles when they are ready. Please consider doing this with all your articles about future sports events, please note that you will still get credit for being the article creator at the point the article is published.

Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:44, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Christopher Hänsch should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Hänsch .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks,

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Erik Tautfest should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Tautfest .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks,

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please add your references to 2018 PDC Calendar? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They're just from the other pages on here.... :P JRRobinson (talk) 20:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, JRRobinson, thanks for responding (and sorry for my delay in seeing it). WIkipedia itself isn't a reliable source; please don't create articles unless you have reliable sources (if the articles have reliable sources in them, you can check them and copy them over.) Is it the same issue for

2018 PDC Players Championship 13? Thnaks, Boleyn (talk) 10:33, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 21:54, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jim Long (darts player).

A New Page Patroller Onel5969 just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please look at

WP:CITE

on how to correctly use footnotes, and how to format citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:09, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article

Hello, JRRobinson. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a polite reminder that Wikipedia relies on

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

Thanks for creating 2019 Players Championship Finals! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Help copy edit and improvements for article. Thanks you. 58.187.77.36 (talk) 09:43, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SportingFlyer and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Pero Ljubic should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pero Ljubic .

You might like to note that such

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SportingFlyer}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SportingFlyer T·C 08:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lukas Wenig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Played 1 PDC tournament and lost his first match. The only references in this article are darts databases, no coverage from reliable media sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 12:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nsk92 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nsk92}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nsk92 (talk) 00:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barry Gardner (darts player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Gardner (darts player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 09:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aaron Rowe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening, Can I remind you off

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brett Mellor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Mellor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jogurney (talk) 18:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo JRRobinson, I’ve just written the acticle 1925–26 FC Basel season. Quote therein: Probably one of the biggest highlights during the friendly games, was the fixture at in the Landhof as Huddersfield Town visited. I noticed that you wrote 1925–26 Huddersfield Town A.F.C. season. I presume that you therefore have access to a good database. Do you know who the goalscorers were in this game on 25 May 1926? I would be very grateful for any information. Kindest regards from Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 13:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Dance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Greville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I dont know how to talk to you. But why on earth are you changing the very correct page of

Regards, Wouter Willems (talk) 13:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not hard at all, Wouter. The play-offs are a separate tournament with a separate sponsor, so they're a different event, and I've already put the necessary follow-on pages on the Home Tour page, so it's not that difficult to find.... 13:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Craven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Craven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 12:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started,

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 22:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He has won a Challenge Tour event, that's a big deal in darts. That alone should be enough to keep him in. JRRobinson (talk) 22:16, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started,

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 22:24, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Darts players should be allowed in if they have played in a European Tour event or won a PDC Tour Card. They've done very well to achieve that feat. The rules need to be improved for darts players. JRRobinson (talk) 22:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Johnson (darts player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Johnson (darts player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gareth Pass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gareth Pass until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Pearce (darts player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Pearce (darts player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hello, JRRobinson

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 08:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JRRobinson,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started,

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 12:59, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florian Hempel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florian Hempel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 14:57, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franz Rötzsch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franz Rötzsch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 15:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please review

I don't see anything under "darts"...., so something needs to be done to update it. These players I have put up have appeared on events that have been broadcast around the world. JRRobinson (talk) 15:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not every individual sport has its own entry. Being a participant in a notable event does not automatically mean the participant is notable. Tens of thousands of people run the Boston Marathon but they don't all get an entry unless they have won. ... discospinster _talk 15:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Huckvale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Huckvale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 15:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Russell (darts player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Russell (darts player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 15:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mindaugas Barauskas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindaugas Barauskas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 15:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kai Gotthardt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Darts player does not meet criteria of

WP:NSPORTS

and I cannot find significant discussion of him in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 15:37, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sam Hill (darts player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Darts player does not meet criteria of

WP:NSPORTS

and I cannot find significant discussion of him in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 15:39, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gaz Cousins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Darts player does not meet criteria of

WP:NSPORTS

and I cannot find significant discussion of him in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 15:39, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Karsten Kornath has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Darts player does not meet criteria of

WP:NSPORTS

and I cannot find significant discussion of him in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 15:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tony Littleton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Darts player does not meet criteria of

WP:NSPORTS

and I cannot find significant discussion of him in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 15:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Scott Marsh (darts player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet criteria of

WP:NSPORTS

and I cannot find singificant coverage of him in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 20:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sebastian Pohl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet criteria of

WP:NSPORT

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 22:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Philipp Hagemann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet criteria of

WP:NSPORT

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 22:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 UK Open Qualifier 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating articles about non-notable darts players. They are going to be deleted and you are just making more work for other editors. ... discospinster _talk 18:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but why are these darts players being deleted. All of them have participated in events that have been broadcast, i.e. major events, and they all should have their own pages. I've put up as much basic info as I could. The fact that one of them has been in a World Championship isn't worthy enough for you is embarrassing!!! This website is supposed to be out expanding the knowledge of all matters of life, and these darts players have earned their rights to have pages. JRRobinson (talk) 08:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jan Hlaváček has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable darts player per

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 19:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]