William Wilberforce

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
For his eldest son, a lawyer and Member of Parliament, see William Wilberforce (1798–1879).

William Wilberforce
Karl Anton Hickel, c. 1794
Member of Parliament
In office
31 October 1780 – February 1825
Preceded byDavid Hartley
Succeeded byArthur Gough-Calthorpe
Constituency
(1812–1825)
Personal details
Born(1759-08-24)24 August 1759
Kingston upon Hull, Yorkshire, England
Died29 July 1833(1833-07-29) (aged 73)
Belgravia, London, England
Resting placeWestminster Abbey
Political partyIndependent
Spouse
​
(m. 1797)​
Children6, including Robert, Samuel and Henry
Alma materSt John's College, Cambridge
Signature
Venerated inAnglicanism
Feast30 July

William Wilberforce (24 August 1759 – 29 July 1833) was a British politician, a

independent Member of Parliament (MP) for Yorkshire (1784–1812). In 1785, he underwent a conversion experience and became an Evangelical
Anglican, which resulted in major changes to his lifestyle and a lifelong concern for reform.

In 1787, Wilberforce came into contact with

Slave Trade Act of 1807
.

Wilberforce was convinced of the importance of religion, morality and education. He championed causes and campaigns such as the

Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. His underlying conservatism
led him to support politically and socially repressive legislation, and resulted in criticism that he was ignoring injustices at home while campaigning for the enslaved abroad.

In later years, Wilberforce supported the campaign for the complete abolition of slavery and continued his involvement after 1826, when he resigned from Parliament because of his failing health. That campaign led to the Slavery Abolition Act 1833, which abolished slavery in most of the British Empire. Wilberforce died just three days after hearing that the passage of the Act through Parliament was assured. He was buried in Westminster Abbey, close to his friend William Pitt the Younger.

Early life and education

Wilberforce was born in Hull, in Yorkshire, England, on 24 August 1759.[1] He was the only son of Robert Wilberforce (1728–1768), a wealthy merchant, and his wife, Elizabeth Bird (1730–1798). His grandfather, William (1690–1774),[2][3] had made the family fortune in the maritime trade with Baltic countries.[a][4] He was twice elected mayor of Hull.[5]

statue on a lawn of a two-storey Georgian house
A statue of William Wilberforce outside Wilberforce House, his birthplace in Hull

Wilberforce was a small, sickly and delicate child with poor eyesight.

Methodist preacher George Whitefield.[1]

Wilberforce's staunchly Church of England mother and grandfather, alarmed at these nonconformist influences and at his leanings towards evangelicalism, brought the 12-year-old boy back to Hull in 1771. Wilberforce was heartbroken at being separated from his aunt and uncle.[10] His family opposed a return to Hull Grammar School because the headmaster had become a Methodist, and Wilberforce therefore continued his education at nearby Pocklington School from 1771 to 1776.[11][12] Influenced by Methodist scruples, he initially resisted Hull's lively social life, but, as his religious fervour diminished, he embraced theatre-going, attended balls, and played cards.[13]

In October 1776, at the age of seventeen, Wilberforce went up to St John's College, Cambridge.[14] The deaths of his grandfather and uncle, in 1774 and 1777 respectively, had left him independently wealthy[15] and as a result he had little inclination or need to apply himself to serious study. Instead he immersed himself in the social round of student life[15][14] and pursued a hedonistic lifestyle, enjoying cards, gambling and late-night drinking sessions – although he found the excesses of some of his fellow students distasteful.[16][17] Witty, generous and an excellent conversationalist, Wilberforce was a popular figure. He made many friends, including the more studious future Prime Minister William Pitt.[17][18] Despite his lifestyle and lack of interest in studying, he managed to pass his examinations[19] and was awarded a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1781 and a Master of Arts degree in 1788.[1]

Early parliamentary career

Wilberforce began to consider a political career while still at university and during the winter of 1779–1780, he and Pitt frequently watched House of Commons debates from the gallery. Pitt, already set on a political career, encouraged Wilberforce to join him in obtaining a parliamentary seat.[19][20] In September 1780, at the age of 21 and while still a student, Wilberforce was elected Member of Parliament for Kingston upon Hull,[1] spending over £8,000, as was the custom of the time, to ensure he received the necessary votes.[21][22] Free from financial pressures, Wilberforce sat as an independent, resolving to be "no party man."[1][23] Criticised at times for inconsistency, he supported both Tory and Whig governments according to his conscience, working closely with the party in power, and voting on specific measures according to their merits.[24][25]

Wilberforce attended Parliament regularly, but he also maintained a lively social life, becoming an habitué of

Prince of Wales said that he would go anywhere to hear Wilberforce sing.[27][28] Wilberforce used his speaking voice to great effect in political speeches; the diarist and author James Boswell witnessed Wilberforce's eloquence in the House of Commons and noted, "I saw what seemed a mere shrimp mount upon the table; but as I listened, he grew, and grew, until the shrimp became a whale."[29]

During the frequent government changes of 1781–1784, Wilberforce supported his friend Pitt in parliamentary debates.

General Lafayette, Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI, and joined the French court at Fontainebleau.[31]

Pitt became Prime Minister in December 1783, with Wilberforce a key supporter of his

minority government.[32] Despite their close friendship, there is no record that Pitt offered Wilberforce a ministerial position in this or future governments. This may have been due to Wilberforce's wish to remain an independent MP. Alternatively, Wilberforce's frequent tardiness and disorganisation, as well as his chronic eye problems that at times made reading impossible, may have convinced Pitt that his trusted friend was not ministerial material.[33] When Parliament was dissolved in the spring of 1784, Wilberforce decided to stand as a candidate for the county of Yorkshire in the 1784 general election.[1] On 6 April, he was returned as MP for Yorkshire at the age of twenty-four.[34]

Conversion

In October 1784, Wilberforce embarked upon a tour of Europe which would ultimately change his life and determine his future career. He travelled with his mother and sister in the company of Isaac Milner, the brilliant younger brother of his former headmaster, who had been Fellow of Queens' College, Cambridge, in the year when Wilberforce first went up. They visited the French Riviera and enjoyed the usual pastimes of dinners, cards, and gambling.[35] In February 1785, Wilberforce returned to London temporarily, to support Pitt's proposals for parliamentary reforms. He rejoined the party in Genoa, Italy, from where they continued their tour to Switzerland. Milner accompanied Wilberforce to England, and on the journey they read "The Rise and Progress of Religion in the Soul" by Philip Doddridge, a leading early 18th-century English nonconformist.[36]

William Wilberforce by John Rising, 1790, pictured at the age of 30

Wilberforce's spiritual journey is thought to have changed course at this time. He started to rise early to read the Bible and pray and kept a private journal.[37] He underwent an evangelical conversion, regretting his past life and resolving to commit his future life and work to the service of God.[1] His conversion changed some of his habits, but not his nature: he remained outwardly cheerful, interested and respectful, tactfully urging others towards his new faith.[38] Inwardly, he underwent an agonising struggle and became relentlessly self-critical, harshly judging his spirituality, use of time, vanity, self-control and relationships with others.[39]

At the time, religious

evangelical Anglican clergyman of the day and Rector of St Mary Woolnoth in the City of London.[41][42] Both Newton and Pitt counselled him to remain in politics, and he resolved to do so "with increased diligence and conscientiousness".[1] Thereafter, his political views were informed by his faith and by his desire to promote Christianity and Christian ethics in private and public life.[43][44] His views were often deeply conservative, opposed to radical changes in a God-given political and social order, and focused on issues such as the observance of the Sabbath and the eradication of immorality through education and reform.[45] As a result, he was often distrusted by progressive voices because of his conservatism, and regarded with suspicion by many Tories who saw evangelicals as radicals, bent on the overthrow of church and state.[25]

In 1786, Wilberforce leased a house in Old Palace Yard, Westminster, in order to be near Parliament. He began using his parliamentary position to advocate reform by introducing a Registration Bill, proposing limited changes to parliamentary election procedures.[1][46] In response to the need for bodies for dissection by surgeons, he brought forward a bill to extend the measure permitting the dissection after execution of criminals such as rapists, arsonists, burglars and violent robbers. The bill also advocated the reduction of sentences for women convicted of treason, a crime that at the time included a husband's murder. The House of Commons passed both bills, but they were defeated in the House of Lords.[47][48][49]

Abolition of the transatlantic slave trade

Initial decision

The British initially became involved in the slave trade during the 16th century. By 1783, the

middle passage.[52] Of the estimated 11 million Africans transported into slavery, about 1.4 million died during the voyage.[53]

The British campaign to abolish the slave trade is generally considered to have begun in the 1780s with the establishment of the

Teston, Kent in 1781, and there met Sir Charles Middleton, Lady Middleton, Thomas Clarkson, Hannah More and others, a group that later became known as the Testonites.[57] Interested in promoting Christianity and moral improvement in Britain and overseas, they were appalled by Ramsay's reports of the depraved lifestyles of slave owners, the cruel treatment meted out to the enslaved, and the lack of Christian instruction provided to the enslaved people.[58] With their encouragement and help, Ramsay spent three years writing An essay on the treatment and conversion of African slaves in the British sugar colonies, which was highly critical of slavery in the West Indies. The book, published in 1784, was to have an important impact in raising public awareness and interest, and it excited the ire of West Indian planters who in the coming years attacked both Ramsay and his ideas in a series of pro-slavery tracts.[59]

Brookes
, illustrating the inhumane conditions aboard such vessels

Wilberforce apparently did not follow up on his meeting with Ramsay.[56] However, three years later, and inspired by his new faith, Wilberforce was growing interested in humanitarian reform. In November 1786, he received a letter from Sir Charles Middleton that re-opened his interest in the slave trade.[60][61] At the urging of Lady Middleton, Sir Charles suggested that Wilberforce bring forward the abolition of the slave trade in Parliament. Wilberforce responded that he "felt the great importance of the subject, and thought himself unequal to the task allotted to him, but yet would not positively decline it".[62] He began to read widely on the subject, and met with the Testonites at Middleton's home at Barham Court in Teston in the early winter of 1786–1787.[63]

In early 1787, Thomas Clarkson, a fellow graduate of St John's, Cambridge, who had become convinced of the need to end the slave trade after writing a prize-winning essay on the subject while at Cambridge,[64] called upon Wilberforce at Old Palace Yard with a published copy of the work.[65] This was the first time the two men had met; their collaboration would last nearly fifty years.[66][67] Clarkson began to visit Wilberforce on a weekly basis, bringing first-hand evidence he had obtained about the slave trade.[66][68] The Quakers, already working for abolition, also recognised the need for influence within Parliament, and urged Clarkson to secure a commitment from Wilberforce to bring forward the case for abolition in the House of Commons.[69][70]

It was arranged that Bennet Langton, a

Isaac Hawkins Browne MP. By the end of the evening, Wilberforce had agreed in general terms that he would bring forward the abolition of the slave trade in Parliament, "provided that no person more proper could be found".[72]

The same spring, on 12 May 1787, the still hesitant Wilberforce held a conversation with William Pitt and the future Prime Minister

William Grenville as they sat under a large oak tree on Pitt's estate in Kent.[1] Under what came to be known as the "Wilberforce Oak" at Holwood House, Pitt challenged his friend: "Wilberforce, why don't you give notice of a motion on the subject of the Slave Trade? You have already taken great pains to collect evidence, and are therefore fully entitled to the credit which doing so will ensure you. Do not lose time, or the ground will be occupied by another."[73] Wilberforce's response is not recorded, but he later declared in old age that he could "distinctly remember the very knoll on which I was sitting near Pitt and Grenville" where he made his decision.[74]

Wilberforce's involvement in the abolition movement was motivated by a desire to put his Christian principles into action and to serve God in public life.[75][76] He and other evangelicals were horrified by what they perceived was a depraved and un-Christian trade, and the greed and avarice of the owners and traders.[76][54] Wilberforce sensed a call from God, writing in a journal entry in 1787 that "God Almighty has set before me two great objects, the suppression of the Slave Trade and the Reformation of Manners".[77][78] The conspicuous involvement of evangelicals in the highly popular anti-slavery movement served to improve the status of a group otherwise associated with the less popular campaigns against vice and immorality.[79]

Early parliamentary action

On 22 May 1787, the first meeting of the Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade took place, bringing like-minded British Quakers and Anglicans together in the same organisation for the first time.[80] The committee chose to campaign against the slave trade rather than slavery itself, with many members believing that slavery would eventually disappear as a natural consequence of the abolition of the trade.[81] Wilberforce, though involved informally, did not join the committee officially until 1791.[82][83]

"Am I Not A Man And A Brother?" Medallion created as part of anti-slavery campaign by Josiah Wedgwood, 1787

The society was highly successful in raising public awareness and support, and local chapters sprang up throughout Great Britain.[54][84] Clarkson travelled the country researching and collecting first-hand testimony and statistics, while the committee promoted the campaign, pioneering techniques such as lobbying, writing pamphlets, holding public meetings, gaining press attention, organising boycotts and even using a campaign logo: an image of a kneeling slave above the motto "Am I not a Man and a Brother?", designed by the renowned pottery-maker Josiah Wedgwood.[54][85][86] The committee also sought to influence slave-trading nations such as France, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Holland and the United States, corresponding with anti-slavery activists in other countries and organising the translation of English-language books and pamphlets.[87] These included books by former enslaved men, Ottobah Cugoano and Olaudah Equiano, who had published influential works on slavery and the slave trade in 1787 and 1789 respectively. They and other free blacks, collectively known as "Sons of Africa", spoke at debating societies and wrote spirited letters to newspapers, periodicals and prominent figures, as well as public letters of support to campaign allies.[88][89][90] Hundreds of parliamentary petitions opposing the slave trade were received in 1788 and following years, with hundreds of thousands of signatories in total.[54][86] The campaign proved to be the world's first grassroots human rights campaign, in which men and women volunteers from different social classes and backgrounds worked to end the injustices suffered by others.[91]

Wilberforce had planned to introduce a motion giving notice that he would bring forward a bill for the

Abolition of the Slave Trade during the 1789 parliamentary session. However, in January 1788, he was taken ill with a probable stress-related condition, now thought to be ulcerative colitis.[92][93] It was several months before he was able to resume work, and he spent time convalescing at Bath and Cambridge. His regular bouts of gastrointestinal illnesses precipitated the use of moderate quantities of opium, which proved effective in alleviating his condition,[94] and which he continued to use for the rest of his life.[95]

In Wilberforce's absence, Pitt, who had long been supportive of abolition, introduced the preparatory motion himself, and ordered a

Privy Council investigation into the slave trade, followed by a House of Commons review.[96][97]

With the publication of the Privy Council report in April 1789 and following months of planning, Wilberforce commenced his parliamentary campaign.

select committee to consider the vast quantity of evidence which had been accumulated.[105] Wilberforce's house in Old Palace Yard became a centre for the abolitionists' campaign and a focus for many strategy meetings.[1] Petitioners for other causes also besieged him there, and his ante-room was thronged from an early hour, like "Noah's Ark, full of beasts clean and unclean", according to Hannah More.[106][107][108]

Let us not despair; it is a blessed cause, and success, ere long, will crown our exertions. Already we have gained one victory; we have obtained, for these poor creatures, the recognition of their human nature, which, for a while was most shamefully denied. This is the first fruits of our efforts; let us persevere and our triumph will be complete. Never, never will we desist till we have wiped away this scandal from the Christian name, released ourselves from the load of guilt, under which we at present labour, and extinguished every trace of this bloody traffic, of which our posterity, looking back to the history of these enlightened times, will scarce believe that it has been suffered to exist so long a disgrace and dishonour to this country.

William Wilberforce — speech before the House of Commons, 18 April 1791[109]

Interrupted by a general election in June 1790, the committee finally finished hearing witnesses, and in April 1791 with a closely reasoned four-hour speech, Wilberforce introduced the first

parliamentary bill to abolish the slave trade.[110][111] However, after two evenings of debate, the bill was easily defeated by 163 votes to 88, the political climate having swung in a conservative direction in the wake of the French Revolution and in reaction to an increase in radicalism and to slave revolts in the French West Indies.[112][113] Such was the public hysteria of the time that even Wilberforce himself was suspected by some of being a Jacobin agitator.[114]

This was the beginning of a protracted parliamentary campaign, during which Wilberforce's commitment never wavered, despite frustration and hostility. He was supported in his work by fellow members of the so-called

Henry Thornton.[115][116] Holding evangelical Christian convictions, and consequently dubbed "the Saints", the group lived in large houses surrounding the common in Clapham, then a village to the south-west of London. Wilberforce accepted an invitation to share a house with Henry Thornton in 1792, moving into his own home after Thornton's marriage in 1796.[117] The "Saints" were an informal community, characterised by considerable intimacy as well as a commitment to practical Christianity and an opposition to slavery. They developed a relaxed family atmosphere, wandering freely in and out of each other's homes and gardens, and discussing the many religious, social and political topics that engaged them.[118]

Pro-slavery advocates claimed that enslaved Africans were lesser human beings who benefited from their bondage.

naval blockade to stem the region's slave trade.[122][123]

On 2 April 1792, Wilberforce again brought a bill calling for abolition of the slave trade. The memorable debate that followed drew contributions from the greatest orators in the house, William Pitt and Charles James Fox, as well as from Wilberforce himself.[124] Henry Dundas, as Home Secretary, proposed a compromise solution of gradual abolition of the trade over a number of years. This was passed by 230 to 85 votes, but Wilberforce believed that it was little more than a clever ploy with the intention of ensuring that total abolition would be delayed indefinitely.[125][126]

War with France

On 26 February 1793, another vote to abolish the slave trade was narrowly defeated by eight votes. The outbreak of

war with France the same month effectively prevented any further serious consideration of the issue, as politicians concentrated on the national crisis and the threat of invasion.[127] The same year, and again in 1794, Wilberforce unsuccessfully brought before Parliament a bill to outlaw British ships from supplying enslaved people to foreign colonies.[119][128] He voiced his concern about the war and urged Pitt and his government to make greater efforts to end hostilities.[129] Growing more alarmed, on 31 December 1794, Wilberforce moved that the government seek a peaceful resolution with France, a stance that created a temporary breach in his long friendship with Pitt.[130]

Abolition continued to be associated in the public consciousness with the French Revolution and with British radical groups, resulting in a decline in public support.[131] In 1795, the Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade ceased to meet, and Clarkson retired in ill-health to the Lake District.[132][133] However, despite the decreased interest in abolition, Wilberforce continued to introduce abolition bills throughout the 1790s.[134][135]

The early years of the 19th century once again saw an increased public interest in abolition. In 1804, Clarkson resumed his work and the Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade began meeting again, strengthened with prominent new members such as Zachary Macaulay, Henry Brougham and James Stephen.[132][136] In June 1804, Wilberforce's bill to abolish the slave trade successfully passed all its stages through the House of Commons. However, it was too late in the parliamentary session for it to complete its passage through the House of Lords. On its reintroduction during the 1805 session, it was defeated, with even the usually sympathetic Pitt failing to support it.[137] On this occasion and throughout the campaign, abolition was held back by Wilberforce's trusting, even credulous nature, and his deferential attitude towards those in power. He found it difficult to believe that men of rank would not do what he perceived to be the right thing, and was reluctant to confront them when they did not.[135]

Final phase of the campaign

The House of Commons in Wilberforce's day by Augustus Pugin and Thomas Rowlandson (1808–1811)

Following Pitt's death in January 1806, Wilberforce began to collaborate more with the Whigs, especially the abolitionists. He gave general support to the

French colonies, was suggested by the maritime lawyer James Stephen.[139] It was a shrewd move, since the majority of British ships were now flying American flags and supplying enslaved people to foreign colonies with whom Britain was at war.[140]

A bill was introduced and approved by the cabinet, and Wilberforce and other abolitionists maintained a self-imposed silence, so as not to draw any attention to the effect of the bill.[141][142] The approach proved successful, and the new Foreign Slave Trade Bill was quickly passed, and received royal assent on 23 May 1806.[143] Wilberforce and Clarkson had collected a large volume of evidence against the slave trade over the previous two decades, and Wilberforce spent the latter part of 1806 writing A Letter on the Abolition of the Slave Trade, which was a comprehensive restatement of the abolitionists' case. The death of Fox in September 1806 was a blow, but was followed quickly by a general election in the autumn of 1806.[144] Slavery became an election issue, bringing more abolitionist MPs into the House of Commons, including former military men who had personally experienced the horrors of slavery and slave revolts.[145]

Wilberforce was re-elected as an MP for Yorkshire,[146] after which he returned to finishing and publishing his Letter, in reality a 400-page book which formed the basis for the final phase of the campaign.[147] Lord Grenville, the Prime Minister, was determined to introduce an Abolition Bill in the House of Lords, rather than in the House of Commons, taking it through its greatest challenge first.[146] When a final vote was taken, the bill was passed in the House of Lords by a large margin.[148] Sensing a breakthrough that had been long anticipated, Charles Grey moved for a second reading in the Commons on 23 February 1807. As tributes were made to Wilberforce, whose face streamed with tears, the bill was carried by 283 votes to 16.[143][149] Excited supporters suggested taking advantage of the large majority to seek the abolition of slavery itself, but Wilberforce made it clear that total emancipation was not the immediate goal: "They had for the present no object immediately before them, but that of putting stop directly to the carrying of men in British ships to be sold as slaves."[150] The Slave Trade Act received royal assent on 25 March 1807.[151]

Personal life

In his youth, William Wilberforce showed little interest in women, but when he was in his late thirties his friend

Henry (born 1807).[1] Wilberforce was an indulgent and adoring father who revelled in his time at home and at play with his children.[155]

Other concerns

Political and social reform

Wilberforce was highly conservative on many political and social issues. He advocated change in society through Christianity and improvement in morals, education and religion, fearing and opposing radical causes and revolution.

Combination Act, which suppressed trade union activity throughout Britain, and calling unions "a general disease in our society".[158][160] He also opposed an enquiry into the 1819 Peterloo Massacre in which eleven protesters were killed at a political rally demanding reform.[161] Concerned about "bad men who wished to produce anarchy and confusion", he approved of the government's Six Acts, which further limited public meetings and seditious writings.[162][163] Wilberforce's actions led the essayist William Hazlitt to condemn him as one "who preaches vital Christianity to untutored savages, and tolerates its worst abuses in civilised states."[164]

Sir Thomas Lawrence
, 1828

Wilberforce's views of women and religion were also conservative. He disapproved of women anti-slavery activists such as Elizabeth Heyrick, who organised women's abolitionist groups in the 1820s, protesting: "[F]or ladies to meet, to publish, to go from house to house stirring up petitions—these appear to me proceedings unsuited to the female character as delineated in Scripture."[165][166] Wilberforce initially strongly opposed bills for Catholic emancipation, which would have allowed Catholics to become MPs, hold public office and serve in the army,[167] although by 1813, he had changed his views and spoke in favour of a similar bill.[168]

Wilberforce advocated legislation to improve the working conditions for chimney-sweeps and textile workers, engaged in

duelling, which he described as the "disgrace of a Christian society" and was appalled when his friend Pitt engaged in a duel with George Tierney in 1798, particularly as it occurred on a Sunday, the Christian day of rest.[174][175]

Wilberforce was generous with his time and money, believing that those with wealth had a duty to give a significant portion of their income to the needy. Yearly, he gave away thousands of pounds, much of it to clergymen to distribute in their parishes. He paid off the debts of others, supported education and

missions, and in a year of food shortages, gave to charity more than his own yearly income. He was exceptionally hospitable, and could not bear to sack any of his servants. As a result, his home was full of old and incompetent servants kept on in charity. Although he was often months behind in his correspondence, Wilberforce responded to numerous requests for advice or for help in obtaining professorships, military promotions and livings for clergymen, or for the reprieve of death sentences.[176][177]

Evangelical Christianity

A supporter of the evangelical wing of the Church of England, Wilberforce believed that the revitalisation of the church and individual Christian observance would lead to a harmonious, moral society.[158] He sought to elevate the status of religion in public and private life, making piety fashionable in both the upper- and middle-classes of society.[178] To this end, in April 1797, Wilberforce published A Practical View of the Prevailing Religious System of Professed Christians in the Higher and Middle Classes of This Country Contrasted With Real Christianity, on which he had been working since 1793. This was an exposition of New Testament doctrine and teachings and a call for a revival of Christianity, as a response to the moral decline of the nation, illustrating his own personal testimony and the views which inspired him. The book proved to be influential and a best-seller by the standards of the day; 7,500 copies were sold within six months, and it was translated into several languages.[179][180]

Wilberforce fostered and supported missionary activity in Britain and abroad, and was involved with other members of the Clapham Sect in various evangelical and charitable organisations. He was a founding member of the

suttee. "Our religion is sublime, pure beneficent", he said, "theirs is mean, licentious and cruel".[188][189]

Moral reform

Greatly concerned by what he perceived to be the degeneracy of British society, Wilberforce was also active in matters of moral reform, lobbying against "the torrent of profaneness that every day makes more rapid advances", and considered this issue and the abolition of the slave trade as equally important goals.

profanation of the Lord's Day, and other dissolute, immoral, or disorderly practices".[193][49] Greeted largely with public indifference, Wilberforce sought to increase its impact by mobilising public figures to the cause,[194][49] and by founding the Society for the Suppression of Vice.[194][195] This and other societies in which Wilberforce was a prime mover, such as the Proclamation Society, mustered support for the prosecution of those who had been charged with violating relevant laws, including brothel keepers, distributors of pornographic material, and those who did not respect the Sabbath.[158]

The writer and clergyman Sydney Smith criticised Wilberforce for being more interested in the sins of the poor than those of the rich, and suggested that a better name would be the "Society for suppressing the vices of persons whose income does not exceed £500 per annum".[61][196] The societies were not highly successful in terms of membership and support, although their activities did lead to the imprisonment of Thomas Williams, the London printer of Thomas Paine's The Age of Reason.[79][134] Wilberforce's attempts to legislate against adultery and Sunday newspapers were also in vain; his involvement and leadership in other, less punitive, approaches were more successful in the long-term, however. By the end of his life, British morals, manners, and sense of social responsibility had increased, paving the way for future changes in societal conventions and attitudes during the Victorian era.[1][158][197]

Emancipation of enslaved Africans

The hopes of the abolitionists notwithstanding, slavery did not wither with the end of the slave trade in the British Empire, nor did the living conditions of the enslaved improve. The trade continued, with few countries following suit by abolishing the trade, and with some British ships disregarding the legislation. The Royal Navy patrolled the Atlantic intercepting slave ships from other countries. Wilberforce worked with the members of the African Institution to ensure the enforcement of abolition and to promote abolitionist negotiations with other countries.[158][198][199] In particular, the United States had abolished the slave trade after 1808 and Wilberforce lobbied the American government to enforce its own mandated prohibition more strongly.[200]

The same year, Wilberforce moved his family from Clapham to a sizeable mansion with a large garden in

rotten borough of Bramber in Sussex, a seat with little or no constituency obligations, thus allowing him more time for his family and the causes that interested him.[201] From 1816, Wilberforce introduced a series of bills which would require the compulsory registration of enslaved people, together with details of their country of origin, permitting the illegal importation of foreign slaves to be detected. Later in the same year he began publicly to denounce slavery itself, though he did not demand immediate emancipation, as "They had always thought the slaves incapable of liberty at present, but hoped that by degrees a change might take place as the natural result of the abolition."[202]

In 1820, after a period of poor health, and with his eyesight failing, Wilberforce took the decision to further limit his public activities,

Thomas Fowell Buxton to take over leadership of the campaign in the Commons.[203] As the 1820s wore on, Wilberforce increasingly became more of a figurehead for the abolitionist movement, although he continued to appear at anti-slavery meetings, welcoming visitors, and maintaining a busy correspondence on the subject.[205][206][207]

The year 1823 saw the founding of the Society for the Mitigation and Gradual Abolition of Slavery (later known as the Anti-Slavery Society),[208] and the publication of Wilberforce's 56-page "Appeal to the Religion, Justice and Humanity of the Inhabitants of the British Empire in Behalf of the Negro Slaves in the West Indies".[209] In his treatise, Wilberforce urged that total emancipation was morally and ethically required, and that slavery was a national crime that must be ended by parliamentary legislation to gradually abolish slavery.[210] Members of Parliament did not quickly agree, and government opposition in March 1823 stymied Wilberforce's call for abolition.[211] On 15 May 1823, Buxton moved another resolution in Parliament for gradual emancipation.[212] Subsequent debates followed on 16 March and 11 June 1824 in which Wilberforce made his last speeches in the House of Commons, and which again saw the emancipationists outmanoeuvred by the government.[213][214]

Last years

Wilberforce's health was continuing to fail, and he suffered further illnesses in 1824 and 1825. With his family concerned that his life was endangered, he declined a peerage[b] and resigned his seat in Parliament, leaving the campaign in the hands of others.[173][216] Thomas Clarkson continued to travel, visiting anti-slavery groups throughout Britain, motivating activists and acting as an ambassador for the anti-slavery cause to other countries,[65] while Buxton pursued the cause of reform in Parliament.[217] Public meetings and petitions demanding emancipation continued, with an increasing number supporting immediate abolition rather than the gradual approach favoured by Wilberforce, Clarkson and their colleagues.[218][219]

Wilberforce was buried in Westminster Abbey next to Pitt. This memorial statue, by Samuel Joseph (1791–1850), was erected in 1840 in the north choir aisle.

In 1826, Wilberforce moved from his large house in Kensington Gore to Hendon Park, a more modest property in the countryside of Mill Hill, north of London,[220][173] where he was soon joined by his son William and family. William had attempted a series of educational and career paths, and a venture into farming in 1830 led to huge losses, which his father repaid in full, despite offers from others to assist. This left Wilberforce with little income, and he was obliged to let his home and spend the rest of his life visiting family members and friends.[221] He continued his support for the anti-slavery cause, including attending and chairing meetings of the Anti-Slavery Society.[222]

Wilberforce approved of the 1830 election victory of the more progressive Whigs, though he was concerned about the implications of their Reform Bill which proposed the redistribution of parliamentary seats towards newer towns and cities and an extension of the franchise. In the event, the Reform Act 1832 was to bring more abolitionist MPs into Parliament as a result of intense and increasing public agitation against slavery. In addition, the 1832 slave revolt in Jamaica convinced government ministers that abolition was essential to avoid further rebellion.[223] In 1833, Wilberforce's health declined further and he suffered a severe attack of influenza from which he never fully recovered.[1] He made a final anti-slavery speech in April 1833 at a public meeting in Maidstone, Kent.[224] The following month, the Whig government introduced the Bill for the Abolition of Slavery, formally saluting Wilberforce in the process.[225] On 26 July 1833, Wilberforce heard of government concessions that guaranteed the passing of the Bill for the Abolition of Slavery.[226] The following day he grew much weaker, and he died early on the morning of 29 July at his cousin's house in Cadogan Place, London.[227][228]

One month later, the House of Lords passed the Slavery Abolition Act, which abolished slavery in most of the British Empire from August 1834. They voted plantation owners £20 million in compensation, giving full emancipation to children younger than six, and instituting a system of

apprenticeship requiring other enslaved peoples to work for their former masters for four to six years in the British West Indies, South Africa, Mauritius, British Honduras and Canada. Nearly 800,000 African enslaved people were freed, the vast majority in the Caribbean.[229][230]

Funeral

Wilberforce had left instructions that he be buried with his sister and daughter at St Mary's Church, Stoke Newington, just north of London. However, the leading members of both Houses of Parliament urged that he be honoured with a burial in Westminster Abbey. The family agreed and, on 3 August 1833, Wilberforce was buried in the north transept, close to his friend William Pitt.[231][232] The funeral was attended by many Members of Parliament, as well as by members of the public. The pallbearers included the Duke of Gloucester, the Lord Chancellor Henry Brougham, and the Speaker of the House of Commons Charles Manners-Sutton.[233][234][235]

While tributes were paid and Wilberforce was laid to rest, both Houses of Parliament suspended their business as a mark of respect.[236]

Legacy

Five years after his death, sons Robert and Samuel Wilberforce published a five-volume biography about their father, and subsequently a collection of his letters in 1840. The biography was controversial in that the authors emphasised Wilberforce's role in the abolition movement and played down the important work of Thomas Clarkson. Incensed, Clarkson came out of retirement to write a book refuting their version of events, and the sons eventually made a half-hearted private apology to him and removed the offending passages in a revision of their biography.[237][238][239] However, for more than a century, Wilberforce's role in the campaign dominated the history books. Later historians have noted the warm and highly productive relationship between Clarkson and Wilberforce, and have termed it one of history's great partnerships: without both the parliamentary leadership supplied by Wilberforce and the research and public mobilisation organised by Clarkson, abolition could not have been achieved.[65][240][241]

As his sons had desired and planned, Wilberforce has long been viewed as a Christian hero, a statesman-saint held up as a role model for putting his faith into action.[1][242][243] Contemporary evangelical and conservative movements in North America appropriate his name and example in their activism.[244][245][246] In particular, the strategies of Wilberforce and other abolitionists are invoked by anti-abortion activists, who controversially equate the abolition of slavery with ending abortion.[247][248][249][246]

More broadly, Wilberforce has also been described as a humanitarian reformer who contributed significantly to reshaping the political and social attitudes of the time by promoting concepts of social responsibility and action.[158] In the 1940s, the role of Wilberforce and the Clapham Sect in abolition was downplayed by historian Eric Williams, who argued that abolition was motivated not by humanitarianism but by economics, as the West Indian sugar industry was in decline.[54][250] Williams' approach strongly influenced historians for much of the latter part of the 20th century. However, more recent historians have noted that the sugar industry was still making large profits at the time of the abolition of the slave trade, and this has led to a renewed interest in Wilberforce and the evangelicals, as well as a recognition of the anti-slavery movement as a prototype for subsequent humanitarian campaigns.[54][251]

Memorials

The Wilberforce Monument in the grounds of Hull College, Hull, erected in 1834

Wilberforce's life and work have been widely commemorated in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. In Westminster Abbey, a seated statue of Wilberforce by Samuel Joseph was erected in 1840, bearing an epitaph praising his Christian character and his long labour to abolish the slave trade and slavery itself.[252]

In Wilberforce's home town of Hull, a public subscription in 1834 funded the

Queen's Gardens.[253] Wilberforce Memorial School for the Blind in York was established in 1833 in his honour.[254]
Wilberforce's birthplace was acquired by the city corporation in 1903 and, following renovation, Wilberforce House in Hull was opened as Britain's first slavery museum[255] In 2006, the University of Hull established the Wilberforce Institute for the study of Slavery and Emancipation in a building beside Wilberforce House.[256][257]

Various churches within the

Ontario, Canada, the Wilberforce Colony was founded by black reformers, and inhabited by freed slaves from the United States.[261]

Amazing Grace, a film about Wilberforce and the struggle against the slave trade, directed by Michael Apted and starring Ioan Gruffudd as William Wilberforce was released in 2007 to coincide with the 200th anniversary of Parliament's anti-slave trade legislation.[262][263]

Works

  • Wilberforce, William (1797). A Practical View of the Prevailing Religious System of Professed Christians, in the Middle and Higher Classes in this Country, Contrasted with Real Christianity. London: T. Caddell.
  • Wilberforce, William (1807). A Letter on the Abolition of the Slave Trade, Addressed to the Freeholders of Yorkshire. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, J. Hatchard.
  • Wilberforce, William (1823). An Appeal to the Religion, Justice, and Humanity of the Inhabitants of the British Empire in behalf of the Negro slaves in the West Indies. London: J. Hatchard and Son.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Lead, cotton, tools and cutlery were among the more frequent exports from Hull to the Baltic countries, with timber, iron ore, yarns, hemp, wine and manufactured goods being imported to Britain on the return journey.(Hague 2007, p. 3)
  2. ^ According to George W. E. Russell, on the grounds that it would exclude his sons from intimacy with private gentlemen, clergymen and mercantile families.[215]

References

  1. ^
    doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/29386 (Subscription or UK public library membership
    required.)
  2. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 6
  3. ^ "William Wilberforce". Leeds Intelligencer. 29 November 1774.
  4. ^ Hague 2007, p. 3
  5. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 3
  6. ^ Tomkins 2007, p. 9
  7. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 4
  8. ^ Hague 2007, p. 5
  9. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 6–8
  10. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 14–15
  11. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 5–6
  12. ^ Hague 2007, p. 15
  13. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 18–19
  14. ^ a b Pollock 1977, p. 7
  15. ^ a b Hague 2007, p. 20
  16. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 8–9
  17. ^ a b Hague 2007, p. 23
  18. ISBN 978-0-00-714720-5
    .
  19. ^ a b Pollock 1977, p. 9
  20. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 24–25
  21. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 11
  22. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 125
  23. ^ Hague 2007, p. 36
  24. ^ Hague 2007, p. 359
  25. ^ a b Oldfield 2007, p. 44
  26. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 125–26
  27. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 15
  28. ^ Wilberforce & Wilberforce 1838, p. 23
  29. ^ "Sickly shrimp of a man who sank the slave ships". The Sunday Times. London: The Times. 25 March 2005. Archived from the original on 14 October 2008. Retrieved 27 November 2007.
  30. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 44–52
  31. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 23
  32. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 23–24
  33. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 52–53, 59
  34. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 31
  35. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 70–72
  36. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 72–74
  37. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 37
  38. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 99–102
  39. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 207–10
  40. ^ Brown 2006, pp. 380–82
  41. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 38
  42. ^ Brown 2006, p. 383
  43. ^ Brown 2006, p. 386
  44. ISBN 978-0-7146-3260-5
  45. ^ a b Hague 2007, p. 446
  46. ^ Hague 2007, p. 97
  47. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 97–99
  48. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 40–42
  49. ^
    S2CID 151411243. Archived from the original on 3 May 2019. Retrieved 7 July 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link
    )
  50. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 116, 119
  51. ^ D'Anjou 1996, p. 97
  52. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 14–15
  53. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 32
  54. ^
    ISBN 978-1-85124-316-7
    .
  55. ^ Ackerson 2005, p. 9
  56. ^ a b Pollock 1977, p. 17
  57. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 138–39
  58. ^ Brown 2006, pp. 351–52, 362–63
  59. ^ Brown 2006, pp. 364–66
  60. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 48
  61. ^ a b Tomkins 2007, p. 55
  62. ^ Hague 2007, p. 140
  63. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 53
  64. OCLC 1023912
    .
  65. ^
    doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/5545 (Subscription or UK public library membership
    required.)
  66. ^ a b Pollock 1977, p. 55
  67. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 123–24
  68. ^ Clarkson, Thomas (1839). The History of the Rise, Progress and Accomplishment of the Abolition of the African Slave-Trade. London: John w. Parker. p. 157.
  69. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 122
  70. ^ D'Anjou 1996, pp. 157–158
  71. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 56
  72. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 122–124
  73. ^ Tomkins 2007, p. 57
  74. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 58
  75. ^ Brown 2006, pp. 26, 341, 458–459
  76. ^ a b Hague 2007, pp. 143, 119
  77. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 69
  78. ^ Tomkins 2007, p. 59
  79. ^ a b Brown 2006, pp. 386–387
  80. ^ Ackerson 2005, pp. 10–11
  81. ^ Ackerson 2005, p. 15
  82. ISBN 978-0-393-31219-5
    .
  83. ^ Oldfield 2007, pp. 40–41
  84. ^ Ackerson 2005, p. 11
  85. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 149–151
  86. ^
    ISBN 0-521-00279-6
    .
  87. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 127
  88. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 136, 168
  89. ^ Brown 2006, p. 296
  90. ISBN 978-0-521-85019-3
    .
  91. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 5–6
  92. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 78–79
  93. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 149–157
  94. ^ a b Hochschild 2005, p. 139
  95. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 79–81
  96. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 82
  97. ^ Hague 2007, p. 159
  98. ^ D'Anjou 1996, p. 166
  99. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 178–183
  100. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 160
  101. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 185–186
  102. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 161–162
  103. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 187–189
  104. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 256–267, 292–293
  105. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 189–190
  106. ^ Wilberforce & Wilberforce 1838, p. 88
  107. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 201–202
  108. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 188
  109. ^ The Parliamentary history of England from the earliest period to the year 1803. Vol. XXIX. London: Printed by T.C. Hansard. 1817. p. 278.
  110. ^ Hague 2007, p. 193
  111. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 105–108
  112. ^ D'Anjou 1996, p. 167
  113. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 196–198
  114. OCLC 75713230
    .
  115. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 218
  116. ^ D'Anjou 1996, p. 140
  117. ISBN 978-0-19-861411-1. (Subscription or UK public library membership
    required.)
  118. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 218–219
  119. ^
    JSTOR 578180
    .
  120. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 150
  121. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 223–224
  122. ISBN 0-8214-1516-6
    .
  123. ^ Ackerson 2005, p. 220
  124. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 114
  125. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 115
  126. ^ Tomkins 2007, p. 99
  127. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 122–123
  128. ^ Hague 2007, p. 242
  129. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 121–122
  130. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 247–249
  131. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 237–239
  132. ^ a b Ackerson 2005, p. 12
  133. ^ Hague 2007, p. 243
  134. ^ a b Hochschild 2005, p. 252
  135. ^ a b Hague 2007, p. 511
  136. ^ Hague 2007, p. 316
  137. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 313–320
  138. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 328–330
  139. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 201
  140. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 332–334
  141. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 335–336
  142. JSTOR 203999
    .
  143. ^ a b Pollock 1977, p. 211
  144. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 342–344
  145. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 304–306
  146. ^ a b Hague 2007, p. 348
  147. ^ Hague 2007, p. 351
  148. ^ Tomkins 2007, pp. 166–168
  149. ^ Hague 2007, p. 354
  150. ^ Hague 2007, p. 355
  151. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 214
  152. ISBN 978-0-19-969939-1
    .
  153. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 251
  154. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 157
  155. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 294–295
  156. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 440–441
  157. ^ Cobbett, William (1823). Cobbett's Political Register. Cox and Baylis. p. 516.
  158. ^
    doi:10.1111/j.1468-2281.1987.tb00500.x
    .
  159. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 250, 254–256
  160. ^ Hague 2007, p. 286
  161. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 441–442
  162. ^ Hague 2007, p. 442
  163. ^ Tomkins 2007, pp. 195–196
  164. ^ Hazlitt, William (1825). The spirit of the age. London: C. Templeton. p. 185.
  165. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 324–327
  166. ^ Hague 2007, p. 487
  167. ^ Tomkins 2007, pp. 172–173
  168. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 406–407
  169. ^ Hague 2007, p. 447
  170. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 92–93
  171. OCLC 186342431
    .
  172. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 74, 498
  173. ^ a b c Tomkins 2007, p. 207
  174. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 287–288
  175. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 299
  176. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 315
  177. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 211–212, 295, 300
  178. ^ Brown 2006, pp. 385–386
  179. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 271–272, 276
  180. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 146–153
  181. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 176
  182. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 220–221
  183. ISSN 2397-1290
    .
  184. JSTOR 4466746
    .
  185. JSTOR 4467142
    .
  186. ^ Tomkins 2007, pp. 115–116
  187. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 221, 408
  188. ^ a b Tomkins 2007, pp. 187–188
  189. ISBN 0-8021-3797-0
    .
  190. ^ Tomkins 2007, pp. 54–55
  191. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 61
  192. ^ Brown 2006, p. 346
  193. ^ Hochschild 2005, p. 126
  194. ^ a b Hague 2007, p. 108
  195. ^ Brown 2006, p. 385
  196. ^ Hague 2007, p. 109
  197. ^ Hague 2007, p. 514
  198. ^ Tomkins 2007, pp. 182–183
  199. ^ Ackerson 2005, pp. 142, 168, 209
  200. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 393–394, 343
  201. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 377–379, 401–406
  202. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 415, 343
  203. ^ a b Pollock 1977, p. 279
  204. ^ Hague 2007, p. 474
  205. ^ Ackerson 2005, p. 181
  206. ^ Oldfield 2007, p. 48
  207. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 492–493, 498
  208. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 286
  209. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 285
  210. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 477–479
  211. ^ Hague 2007, p. 481
  212. ^ Tomkins 2007, p. 203
  213. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 289
  214. ^ Hague 2007, p. 480
  215. ^ Russell, George William Erskine (1898). Collections and Recollections. Harper and Brothers. p. 67.
  216. ^ Oldfield 2007, p. 45
  217. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/4247 (Subscription or UK public library membership
    required.)
  218. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 486–487
  219. ^ Tomkins 2007, pp. 206–207
  220. ^ "A History of the County of Middlesex: Volume 5, Hendon, Kingsbury, Great Stanmore, Little Stanmore, Edmonton Enfield, Monken Hadley, South Mimms, Tottenham". British History Online. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
  221. ^ Hague 2007, p. 494
  222. ^ Tomkins 2007, p. 213
  223. ^ Hague 2007, p. 498
  224. ^ Tomkins 2007, p. 217
  225. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 498–499
  226. ^ Hague 2007, p. 502
  227. ^ Pollock 1977, p. 308
  228. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 502–503
  229. ISBN 978-0-8071-3232-6
  230. ^ Evans, William David; Hammond, Anthony; Granger, Thomas C. (1836), A Collection of Statutes Connected with the General Administration of the Law: Arranged According to the Order of Subjects (3rd ed.), W. H. Bond, p. 837
  231. ^ Stanley, A. P. (1882), Historical Memorials of Westminster Abbey, London: John Murray, p. 248
  232. ^ Hague 2007, p. 304
  233. ^ Hague 2007, p. 504
  234. ^ Pollock 1977, pp. 308–309
  235. ^ "Funeral of the Late Mr. Wilberforce". The Times. 5 August 1833. pp. 3, col. C.
  236. ^ Tomkins 2007, p. 223
  237. ^ Clarkson, Thomas (1838). Strictures on a Life of William Wilberforce by the Rev. W. Wilberforce, and the Rev. S. Wilberforce. Longman & Company.
  238. ^ Ackerson 2005, pp. 36–37, 41
  239. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 350–351
  240. ^ Hague 2007, pp. 154–155, 509
  241. ^ Hochschild 2005, pp. 351–352
  242. ^ "William Wilberforce". The New York Times. 13 December 1880. Retrieved 24 March 2008.
  243. ^ Oldfield 2007, pp. 48–49
  244. ISBN 978-1-60258-253-8
  245. ISBN 978-1442615694
  246. ^ a b Kingston, Anne (12 September 2018), "How Canada's growing anti-abortion movement plans to swing the next federal election", Macleans.ca, retrieved 30 May 2023
  247. ^ Crockett, Emily (24 April 2016), "Why Republicans love comparing abortion to slavery", Vox, retrieved 30 May 2023
  248. ^ Vinograd, Cassandra (27 April 2016), "Meet the American Peddling Abortion Pictures Abroad", NBC News, retrieved 30 May 2023
  249. ISBN 978-1442615694
  250. ISBN 978-0-8078-4488-5
    .
  251. ^ D'Anjou 1996, p. 71
  252. ^ "William Wilberforce". Westminster Abbey. Retrieved 21 March 2008.
  253. ^ "The Wilberforce Monument". BBC. Retrieved 21 March 2008.
  254. ^ Oldfield 2007, pp. 66–67
  255. ^ Oldfield 2007, pp. 70–71
  256. ISSN 0261-3077
    . Retrieved 19 June 2023.
  257. BBC
    . 6 July 2006. Retrieved 30 October 2011.
  258. ISBN 0-334-02883-3
    .
  259. ^ Ackerson 2005, p. 145
  260. ISBN 978-0-87338-763-7
    .
  261. ISBN 978-0-8147-5826-7
  262. Daily Telegraph
    . Retrieved 16 April 2008.
  263. ^ Riding, Alan (14 February 2007). "Abolition of slavery is still an unfinished story". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 16 April 2008.

Works cited

External links
Parliament of Great Britain
Preceded by Member of Parliament for Kingston upon Hull
1780–1784 		Succeeded by
Preceded by
1801
 (Parliament abolished)
Parliament of the United Kingdom
Preceded by
(Parliament created)
1801–1812
 Succeeded by
Preceded by Member of Parliament for Bramber
1812–1825 		Succeeded by
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Wilberforce&oldid=1220728721"