Abstract object theory

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Abstract object theory (AOT) is a branch of

Edward Zalta in 1981,[2] the theory was an expansion of mathematical Platonism
.

Overview

Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics (1983) is the title of a publication by Edward Zalta that outlines abstract object theory.

AOT is a

round square and the mountain made entirely of gold) merely encode them.[7] While the objects that exemplify properties are discovered through traditional empirical means, a simple set of axioms allows us to know about objects that encode properties.[8] For every set of properties, there is exactly one object that encodes exactly that set of properties and no others.[9] This allows for a formalized ontology
.

A notable feature of AOT is that several notable paradoxes in naive predication theory (namely

restricted abstraction schemata to avoid such paradoxes.[16]

In 2007, Zalta and Branden Fitelson introduced the term computational metaphysics to describe the implementation and investigation of formal, axiomatic metaphysics in an automated reasoning environment.[17][18]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Zalta, Edward N. (2004). "The Theory of Abstract Objects". The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  2. .
  3. ^ Dale Jacquette, Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence, Walter de Gruyter, 1996, p. 17.
  4. ^ Alexius Meinong, "Über Gegenstandstheorie" ("The Theory of Objects"), in Alexius Meinong, ed. (1904). Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie (Investigations in Theory of Objects and Psychology), Leipzig: Barth, pp. 1–51.
  5. ^ a b Zalta 1983, p. xi.
  6. ^ Mally, Ernst (1912). Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Logik und Logistik [Object-theoretic Foundations for Logics and Logistics] (PDF) (in German). Leipzig: Barth. §§33 and 39.
  7. ^ Zalta 1983, p. 33.
  8. ^ Zalta 1983, p. 36.
  9. ^ Zalta 1983, p. 35.
  10. JSTOR 2214691
    .
  11. ^ Rapaport, William J. (1978). "Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox". Noûs. 12 (2): 153–180.
  12. .
  13. .
  14. ^ Daniel Kirchner, "Representation and Partial Automation of the Principia Logico-Metaphysica in Isabelle/HOL", Archive of Formal Proofs, 2017.
  15. ^ Zalta 2024, p. 253: "Some non-core λ-expressions, such as those leading to the Clark/Boolos, McMichael/Boolos, and Kirchner paradoxes, will be provably empty."
  16. ^ Zalta 1983, p. 158.
  17. ISSN 0022-3611
    .
  18. ^ Jesse Alama, Paul E. Oppenheimer, Edward N. Zalta, "Automating Leibniz's Theory of Concepts", in A. Felty and A. Middeldorp (eds.), Automated Deduction – CADE 25: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Automated Deduction (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: Volume 9195), Berlin: Springer, 2015, pp. 73–97.

References

Further reading