Assisted migration of forests in North America

Add links
This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Biomes of North America - CURRENT (Rehfeldt et al. 2012)[1]
Biomes of North America - PROJECTED 2060 (Rehfeldt et al. 2012)[1]

Assisted migration is the movement of populations or species by humans from one territory to another in response to

climate adaptation "could be a proactive, pragmatic tool for building climate resilience in our landscapes."[2]

Programs for assisted migration of forests in North America have been created by public and indigenous governmental bodies, private forest owners, and land trusts. They have been researching, testing, evaluating, and sometimes implementing forest assisted migration projects as a form of adaptation to climate change.[3][4] Assisted migration in the forestry context differs from assisted migration as originally proposed in the context of conservation biology, where it is regarded as a management tool for helping endangered species cope with the need for climate adaptation.[5] The focus in forestry is mitigating climate change's negative effects on the health and productivity of working forests.

Forestry assisted migration is already underway in North America because of the rapidly changing climate and the forestry industry's reseeding practices. It is now standard practice for governmental and industrial harvests of trees to be followed by the planting of seeds or seedlings in the harvested areas. Hence, an opportunity automatically arises post-harvest to select seeds (and sometimes different species of trees) from areas with climates that are expected to arrive in the harvested sites decades into the future. The government of British Columbia in Canada was the first federated state on the continent to make the decision to change their seed transfer guidelines accordingly in 2009.[6][7][8]

Longer distance forms of assisted migration were not, however, considered prior to

climate modelling and within-forest evidence of the increasing pace of climate change. Serious discussion and debate ensued in the forestry profession beginning around 2008.[9] The debate focuses around the ethical implications of artificially migrating ecosystems, the risks and benefits of such endeavors, and the values at the heart of assisted forest migration projects.[10]

There are also recorded instances of inadvertent assisted migration of North American trees. Beginning in the early 20th century, two trees famously

coast redwood, have been planted for urban forestry purposes northward in cities along the Pacific coast of Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. Today these specimens are not only thriving; they are prominent along urban skylines and often outrank the native trees in sizes achieved. As well, several kinds of Magnolia native to the southeastern United States
have dispersed into the forest understory, thanks to ornamental plantings producing seeds beyond their native ranges.

Climate change as impetus

See also: Climate change in Canada, Climate change in the United States, and Climate change in Mexico

Climate change is increasing the average temperatures of North American forests.[11][12] By the 2020s the forestry profession in North America no longer debated whether human assistance in helping native trees might be necessary. A 2023 scientific article began, "Global change is reshaping climatic conditions at a tempo that exceeds natural migration rates for most tree species." The implications are that "this mismatch may cause catastrophic losses of key forest ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, habitat provisioning, and forest products."[13]

Range shifts upslope to higher topographic altitudes require less distance than shifts tracking climate over relatively flat terrain poleward.

pinyon-juniper woodland, following drought-induced die-off of trees.[17] Foresters in Minnesota are predicting that prairie ecosystems will expand, replacing forests as their region becomes warmer and drier.[18] Regional climate change in the Sierra mountains of California made it possible for native bark beetles to kill drought-stressed conifer trees, which in turn led to expansive and catastrophic fires.[19] Although the giant sequoia is more resistant to bark beetles than are the pines and firs intermixed in and surrounding its groves, the regional fires consuming the standing dead conifers in 2020 and 2021 proved fatal to giant sequoias whose living canopies were also engulfed.[20][21]

The northern populations of temperate tree species ranges in coastal Washington and Oregon began to evidence abrupt decline and mortality over such large regions that news articles written for the public,

Abies)[23] were featured in reports of sudden decline. While proximate causes included evidence of native insects and fungal pathogens, the reports attributed ultimate cause to the unprecedented summer droughts and heat waves in the region. In 2023, the tree species dominating the lower western slopes of California's Sierra Nevada mountains were reported to be so lagging in tracking warming climate upslope that one-fifth of the total area was labelled as "zombie forests" — that is, forests that can no longer establish new seedlings and thus will not revive after a canopy-destroying fire.[27][28]

A synthesis paper published in 2022 by a team of governmental and university forestry scientists in the United States warned that "climate change may represent the greatest challenge ever faced by forest managers, conservation biologists, and ecologists." Catastrophic tree mortality was among the challenges listed by the team as not only projected but already underway.[29]

Definitions

Main article: Assisted migration

A 2011 discussion paper in the British Columbia Journal of Ecosystems and Management offered this definition of assisted migration: "the purposeful movement of species to facilitate or mimic natural population or range expansion to help ensure forest plantations remain resilient in future climates."[30] A 2016 review article defines forestry assisted migration as "the physical realignment of natural populations to the climate for which they are adapted, by reforestation in sites where their suitable climate is predicted to occur in the future, as an active management option with the aim of maintaining healthy tree ecosystems in the future."[31] The article says that human assistance in helping trees migrate is necessary because "geographic shifts of tree populations will have to be 10 to 100 times faster than they have been in the past or are at present."[31]

Three types

Three types of forestry assisted migration[32]

There are three types of forestry assisted migration, which Natural Resources Canada describes in this way:[3]

  1. Assisted population migration: the human-assisted movement of populations within a species' established range.
  2. Assisted range expansion: the human-assisted movement of species to areas just outside their established range, facilitating or mimicking natural range expansion.
  3. Assisted long-distance migration: the human-assisted movement of species to areas far outside their established range (beyond areas accessible through natural dispersal).

The United States Forest Service uses the same three types, but sometimes refers to the third type as assisted species migration.[32] In 2018 the U.S. Forest Service published a longer policy document, which listed and defined the three types this way:[33]

  1. Assisted population migration (also assisted genetic migration or assisted gene flow[34]) – moving seed sources or populations to new locations within the historical species range.
  2. Assisted range expansion – moving seed sources or populations from their current range to suitable areas just beyond the historical species range, facilitating or mimicking natural dispersal.
  3. Assisted species migration (also species rescue, managed relocation, or assisted long-distance migration) – moving seed sources or populations to a location far outside the historical species range, beyond locations accessible by natural dispersal.

Terminology to distinguish forestry applications of assisted migration from the more controversial practices being debated within conservation biology were suggested in a lengthy 2012 report on climate adaptation within the U.S. Forest Service. The authors proposed "forestry assisted migration" for their agency's endeavors and "rescue assisted migration" for the species-specific extinction concerns of conservation biologists.[35] That same year nine forestry scientists (all but one of whom is Canadian) coauthored a paper that likewise recommended "forest assisted migration" as preferred terminology for helping their profession stay clear of the controversy that they referred to as "species rescue assisted migration".[36] As of 2021, the original classification names of the three types is in public as well as professional use, with foresters focusing on the two most moderate forms.[21]

Early scholarship and debate

Beginning in 2004 and accelerating in 2007, researchers in

managed relocation.[41][42]

Native bark beetles are now able to kill even the highest elevation trees (Engelmann spruce) in the national forests of Colorado. Photo June 2014, Wolf Creek Pass.

The focus among forestry professionals and researchers was different. Paleoecologists had already concluded that there were significant lags in northward movement of even the dominant canopy trees in North America during the thousands of years since the final glacial retreat.[43][44][45][46] In the 1990s, forestry researchers had begun applying climate change projections to their own tree species distribution models, and some results on the probable distances of future range shifts prompted attention.[9] As well, translocation terminology was not controversial among forestry researchers because "migration" was the standard term used in paleoecology for natural movements of tree species recorded in the geological record. Discussion in forestry journals therefore pertained more to questions of how and when and for which species climate-adaptive plantings and range expansions should begin.

Debate as to the need for and ethics of assisted migration was present among forestry researchers. But compared to the debate among conservation biologists,[47] it was muted and short-lived.[36][32] One of the strongest statements urging caution that appeared in a forestry journal was published in 2011. Isabelle Aubin and colleagues stated that "assisted migration is being proposed to reduce the impacts of human-induced climate change, an unprecedented situation in human history that brings with it entirely new environmental, societal and ethical challenges."[10]

But also in 2011, researchers within the Canadian Forest Service expressly distinguished forestry assisted migration from the concept debated in conservation biology.

ecosystem services as well as the extractive resource values of timber and pulp production.[36] The Canadian Forest Service also produced research showing forest health and productivity could benefit from relocating forest understory plant species along with the dominant canopy tree species and that this would help with the successful establishment of a forest at a new location.[48]

Strategies

"Transition" results from assisted migration of more southerly tree species[50]
A list of 15 tree species native to more southerly regions of the US, but which were already (or would soon become during climate change) adapted for living in the Chicago area[51]

In focusing on common canopy trees, forestry forms of assisted migration generated less intense debate than did the largely animal focus of conservation biologists.[52] Animals have the ability to move at will and thus pose risks of quickly shifting beyond or entirely out of the locales into which they are translocated. Animal mobility also complicates monitoring results, and may require the added costs of radio collars and skilled trackers. Costs of translocating mammals, in particular, may escalate owing to standards of minimizing psychological and physical suffering during capture, transport, and release.[53]

In contrast, assisted migration of forests can be done at little cost, especially when it is paired with an existing reforestation program. Risks are also reduced in forestry because the only motility that trees have occurs when their seeds are released.[54] Tall woody plants tend to have long generation times, so several decades may pass before translocated seeds or seedlings can produce a next generation of seeds. Even then, seed dispersal distances may be limited, except for tufted seeds carried by wind and small fruits, such as berries, swallowed whole by birds and wide-ranging mammals.[55]

Communication strategies have also defused the controversy. Forest researchers and managers have talked and written about climate adaptation projects without using terminology coined by conservation biologists, whose focus is generally the wellbeing of single species of animals and plants that might be harmed or lost as climate change continues.[56][57]

By 2014 forestry managers in Canada had also honed their public communications in a number of ways, such as avoiding to be associated with the scientific debate on assisted migration and instead presenting their assisted migration as forest management best practices.[58][59]

Communication in both word and images has also been honed in the United States, thanks in part to the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science (NIACS), a collaborative group launched in 2010 by the U.S. Forest Service.[60] The NIACS proposed various ways though which foresters can adapt to climate change by changing their forest management techniques.[61]

A 2022 review paper that charted key words and lead authors in forestry publications concluded that "much of the research on assisted migration has been carried out in North America, where Canada and the USA have established strong collaborative networks." At the individual level, a Mexican forestry scientist was found to be "the most productive author in the field of assisted migration."[62]

Indigenous people's perspectives and actions

Starting in 1492, the arrival of colonizers pushed

climate adaptation may be a necessary consideration today, assisted migration is not a readily palatable option for Indigenous peoples, given the grounding in mutual relations with the ecosystems in which their cultures are enmeshed.[64]

The term "assisted colonization", used in the guidelines of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to describe moving a species outside its native range to prevent it from going extinct, has been criticized as potentially offensive to Indigenous peoples because the word "colonization" is linked to their experience of genocide.[65] According to Connie Barlow, the term 'managed relocation' may also be offensive in the United States, owing to the harm caused by the Indian Relocation Act of 1956.[66] Some scholars have pointed out that this terminology could prevent these nations from consenting to and participating in forestry assisted migration projects.[67]

Indigenous botanist

SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, which lists "Helping Forests Walk" as a five-year collaborative project launched in 2011[70] and completed in 2016.[71][72] This project is also listed on the "tribal nations" page of the U.S. government "Climate Resilience Toolkit" website.[73]

In 2024 a collaborative report presented Indigenous knowledge and forest management experience as meriting equal standing alongside the prevailing paradigm and assumptions inherent in forestry grounded in western science.[74] Authors and contributors included university academics, research scientists in both the USA and Canadian forestry services, and tribal forestry professionals. Indigenous values described as a "culture of reciprocity" with other living beings and entailing responsibility for future generations grounded the recommendations in this report. Assisted migration is mentioned only once in this lengthy report: "Active planting of tree species in areas that will be more climate-suitable for them in the future (i.e., assisted migration) may help to reforest landscapes where longer term stability is a goal."

The Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science facilitated collaboration on a tribal climate adaptation menu for the Great Lakes region. The document that resulted was published in 2019 as Dibaginjigaadeg Anishinaabe Ezhitwaad: A Tribal Climate Adaptation Menu. The only standard term used was "assisted migration" (and this was used only once). The term "invasive species" was replaced either by a new term, "non-local beings", or by an Ojibwe phrase, "Bakaan ingoji ga-ondaadag", which is defined as "that which comes from somewhere else and now resides here."[75] The document summarized the importance of word choice in this way:

As the original and current stewards of the Great Lakes region, Ojibwe and Menominee tribal members who worked on this project felt it important to bring a language of parity between human and non-human beings. English and scientific terminology used in currently accepted land management practices tends to assume human dominance over non-human beings. This approach deviates from an equitable co-existence with our environment, which is typically a foundational understanding in many indigenous cultures. The terms used throughout this document are an attempt to recognize agency and sovereignty of our non-human relations.[75]

Native Americans may have helped pawpaw (Asimina triloba) disperse by carrying its fruit northward as glaciers retreated in eastern North America.

As of 2021, the

swamp white oak, sassafras, and pawpaw. Noah Jansen, conservationist staff, explains, "I don't know which of these species are going to thrive in 50 or 100 years. So we cast the net broad and try to have something there that creates habitat for wildlife, sources of cultural significance for tribal members and areas to hunt and gather."[76]

Because California is already experiencing adverse climate change effects on native vegetation, the need for adaptive responses is severe. Traditional use of fire in managing local ecosystems for safety and for ensuring abundance of culturally significant plant and animal foods has drawn media attention to the climate-adaptive actions by the Karuk Tribe along the Klamath River of northern California.[77]

Implementation

Changes in seed transfer guidelines

Tunnels created by the larvae of native bark beetles are evident beneath the bark of this dead Douglas-fir trunk in Colorado.

Forestry research has long been conducted by governmental agencies responsible for management of federal and provincial forests in Canada (

climate adaptation measure should be implemented.[33][7]

In 2009, British Columbia altered its standards for selecting seeds for replanting forests after a timber harvest.[79] Previously, foresters were required to use seeds from within 300 meters downhill and 200 meters uphill, but the new policy allowed foresters to obtain seeds from up to 500 meters downhill for most species, taking advantage of the fact that populations in warmer habitats downhill may be better adapted to the future climate of the restoration site.[80] As of 2022, research, including study of provenance trials already in place, is ongoing in British Columbia[81] and the Canadian provinces of Alberta[82] and Ontario.[83] These changes were implemented partly because Canadian policymakers feared that, if they did not set the guidelines, the private sector would be tempted to pursue an unregulated assisted migration strategy on its own.[84] In 2022, the climate-adapted seed transfer guidelines for British Columbia transitioned from being optional for provincial reforestation projects to mandatory.[85]

Within the United States Forest Service, regional geneticists have recommended a "no regrets" approach to considering assisted migration and seed transfer as a climate adaptation strategy.[86][87] Population transfers to match seed sources to projected future conditions are recommended only for species where experience or research has demonstrated appropriate climate transfer limits.[33] Forest Service researchers have also used computer modeling to offer projections of native tree species range shifts under a variety of climate change projections. A total of 76 species of trees native to the western US have range-shift projection maps available online.[88][89][90] A total of 134 species of trees native to the eastern US have range shift projection maps available online.[91] Forest Service researchers have also been publishing regional range shift projections for North American tree species since the 1990s.[92][93]

Eastern Seed Zone Map, by U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Several decision support tools are available for assisted migration in North American forests. The Seedlot Selection Tool currently has the broadest geographic scope of these tools, covering most of North America, and requires the user to set the acceptable climate transfer distances from a suite of climate variables.

common garden experiments to determine acceptable seed sources, based on anticipated growth and climate-transfer distance.[95] The Climate-Adapted Seed Tool provides coverage in California, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, and Idaho (with some features currently only available in California) and uses data from common garden experiments and forest inventories to produce estimates of how well different seed sources will perform (growth, survival, carbon sequestration, timber production) at user-specified planting locations.[96]

In the eastern United States, forestry professionals in federal, state, and academic institutions have collaborated in establishing a mutually agreed upon map of 247 "seed-collection zones" spanning the 37 states east of the Rocky Mountains.[97][98] (See image at right.) This project also entails standardized norms for labelling seeds by collectors and nurseries in anticipation that future reforestation and restoration plantings may begin to include various forms of forestry assisted migration.

In 2024, a forestry paper was published in which a "climate analog approach" was offered for seed transfer and assisted migration decision-making.[99] Instead of needing to first choose among a range of projection maps (usually at 30-year intervals) based on a variety of IPCC-approved computer models, forest managers would be offered a single map that aggregates three such models, utilizes 19 climate variables, and restricts its focus to mid-century projections. As well, instead of outputs showing range projections for one species at a time, the tool would pinpoint "sites with contemporary climate similar to the future climate at a target location."

Western larch

Western larch in autumn

In 2010, the Government of British Columbia implemented an assisted range expansion project for one particular canopy species: the western larch. Larch could now be selected for provincial reforestation projects nearly 1,000 kilometers northward of its current range.[59] Research had shown that the western larch, the most productive of the three species of larch native to North America,[100] has no trouble growing in northern British Columbia, where climatic conditions are predicted to match the western larch's historical range by 2030.[84] This was the first government-approved assisted long-distance migration program for a North American canopy tree. The western larch was selected for assisted species migration because of its significant commercial importance and the fear that climate change and parasites such as the mountain pine beetle would considerably diminish its supply.[101]

Foresters in the United States have also initiated "experimental treatments" of larch-dominated national forests in Montana.[102] However, if some "aggressively warming climate scenarios" unfold, foresters will need to let go of any expectations of helping this species maintain a presence south of the Canadian border.[100]

Whitebark pine

An old whitebark pine in Oregon

University of British Columbia forestry researchers Sierra McLane and Sally Aitken were among the first scientists to engage in long-distance experimental plantings to test how far northward seeds of a tree native to North America could germinate and continue to grow, in advance of expected warming in North America.

whitebark pine for their case study, as it is a keystone species that is already a threatened species in western North America. The authors used species distribution modelling
to learn that this species will likely be extirpated from most of its current range as temperatures rise over the next half century. The same models indicate that a large area within northwestern British Columbia is already climatically suitable for the species under current conditions and will remain so throughout the 21st century.

Experimental plantings in eight sites began in 2007. Ten years later results were tallied. Protective snow cover throughout the winter, followed by spring melt ending in April or May, proved to be a far better indicator of seedling survival and growth than latitude. Indeed, the tallest seedlings measured in 2017 were those at the northern-most experimental site—600 kilometers beyond the species' current distribution. The authors explained that "post-glacial migration has been too slow" for this large-seeded pine to track warming, even during the thousands of years that preceded the pace and scale of

human-caused climate change.[103] These experimental plantings for learning the poleward limits of tolerance, reproduction, and thrival of whitebark pine are first steps toward implementation.[104]

In 2012 the Canadian federal government declared Whitebark pine endangered in accordance with the Species at Risk Act. Accordingly, it became the first federally listed endangered tree in western Canada.[105]

In 2022 the

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.[108]

Mexico's oyamel fir

Danaus plexippus

The

oyamel fir is a major species of evergreen on which the overwintering butterflies spend a significant time during their winter diapause, or suspended development.[110] The tree's survival is threatened at its lower elevations on mountain slopes, in part, by climate change. Climate stress is also indicated by weak seedling recruitment, meaning that most of the oyamel fir seedlings do not survive past that point. This is true even in the higher forest elevations where trees do not otherwise show strong indicators of stress.[111] Upslope assisted migration experiments are underway, with findings suggesting that "400 meters upward in elevation (i.e., assisted migration) to compensate for future warmer climates does not appear to have any negative impacts on the seedlings, while potentially conferring closer alignment to future climates."[112]

Assisted migration of oyamel fir is complicated by the necessity of planting this shade-tolerant species under nurse plants—especially because of the extreme solar radiation and the large differences between day and night temperatures at high elevations.[103][113] Thus, where upslope locales are devoid of forest shade, nurse plants (e.g. Baccharis conferta) must be established first.[111]

Recent developments (2019-present)

Collaborative organizations of USA and Canadian agencies and forestry interest groups have begun experimenting with one or more of the three types of assisted migration. Among them is the Adaptive Silviculture for Climate Change (ASCC) project [114] and the Experimental Network for Assisted Migration and Establishment Silviculture (ENAMES).[115]

Acer saccharum range map

By 2021 the projects for climate adaptation in forestry had expanded to include planting "novel species" from southward latitudes of the same continent.

Virginia pine, and American chestnut. A 2023 article reports early success of an ongoing experiment of "assisted range expansion" in another eastern province of Canada. In Quebec forestry scientists have experimentally planted sugar maple, Acer saccharum, northward of its current range. Losses of this species are expected in Canada due to competitive challenges from more southerly tree species moving north.[119]

In 2019 a small land trust in northern Michigan, the Leelanau Conservancy, began advising land owners to plant "trees whose native ranges end just south of here, yet are projected to do well in our region."[120] By 2023 two other land conservancies in Michigan were reported as also planting more southerly tree species including sycamore, pawpaw, blackgum, tuliptree, Kentucky coffeetree, honey locust, and red mulberry.[121]

A grove of Pinus resinosa (red pine) at Itasca State Park, Minnesota

In

Red pine (Pinus resinosa).[29] Brian Palik, a forestry researcher involved in the project, reports favorable early results. Ponderosa pine, he says, "grows better than anything else that we planted."[123] In 2023 researchers reported that even more southerly tree species "are doing well" in test plantings. These include northern pecan and American sycamore.[127]

This incense cedar, whose native range is in Oregon and northern California, was one of the more southerly conifer seedlings planted after a logging operation on private land on Whidbey Island in Washington state 2019.

In early spring 2020 a multi-group effort

incense cedar. This species is more drought-tolerant than western red-cedar, but all wild populations occur southward of Washington state. Including incense cedar in the planting list thus brings an element of assisted species migration into this forest restoration project.[130] First-year survival was strong for southerly sourced seedlings of both Douglas-fir and incense cedar.[131]

While extreme summer drought and heat in the mountain states and provinces of western North America have induced massive outbreaks of native bark beetles and fire-caused losses of forest canopies, tree deaths in the eastern half of North America derive from a different mix of causes.

climate adaptation for species including eastern cottonwood, American hackberry, and river birch.[133]

The boldest assisted migration effort of a forest canopy tree had been initiated by citizens in the Seattle area in 2016. By 2023, their actions had become so substantial that a lengthy journalistic essay was published in a national venue. It was titled, "Can We Save the Redwoods by Helping Them Move?"[134][135] Two months later, a lengthy news article presented the views of a half-dozen professional forestry practitioners in Oregon and Washington state.[136] Their statements made clear that citizens using "assisted species migration" in their choices of tree plantings (such as the redwoods) were more extreme than the professionals focusing on "assisted population migration" were willing to implement themselves.

In 2024 a Mexican leader who has long advocated for assisted migration to become a standard

El Niño had already pushed global temperatures to the 1.5 °C threshold of increase that generates self-reinforcing tipping points. His conclusion: "Thus, the time has arrived to discuss painful forest management decisions, such as anticipated thinning to reduce water competition and the gradual replacement of native local forest populations with more drought-resistant provenances and species."[137]

Inadvertent migration

Coast redwood planted in 1948 in Seabeck, Washington, along the eastern seacoast of the Olympic Peninsula

Mature

horticultural plantings of trees northward of their native ranges are a form of assisted migration experiment already underway.[138] Because the original plantings likely did not include the goal of helping the trees migrate northward in a warming climate, this form of assisted migration can be called inadvertent, or unintended. Jesse Bellemare and colleagues may have coined the term in a paper published in 2015: "It appears that a subset of native plants, particularly those with ornamental value, might already have had opportunities to shift their ranges northward via inadvertent human assistance."[139] Bellemare suggests, "Native plant horticulture is giving us some fascinating insights into what is likely to happen with climate change."[140]

Horticultural plantings of Coast Redwood and Giant Sequoia

This is the largest giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) among more than a dozen that were planted early in the 20th century in Laurelhurst Park of Portland, Oregon.

The tallest tree in the world is the

paleobiogeography and current range conditions, as grounds for proposing that Canada's Vancouver Island already offered "narrow strips of optimal habitat" for extending the range of coast redwood.[144]

Video-documentation and analysis of a sampling of horticultural plantings of both species of California trees reveals strong growth from Portland to Seattle—substantially north of their native ranges. While horticulturally planted coast redwood and giant sequoia regularly produce cones in this northward region, only coast redwood is documented as having fully naturalized. This is evidenced by seedlings and saplings growing nearby the original plantings.[145]

Northward planting of Coast Redwood in tree farms

In 2023 a site near Seattle hosted the annual meeting of the Washington Farm Forest Association. The group visited "a thriving stand of 33-year-old redwoods" that had been deliberately planted at the family-owned tree farm in 1990. PropagationNation, a citizen-group promoting the planting of both coast redwood and giant sequoia into the Pacific Northwest,[146] posted a report on the history of the redwood grove and the group's experience at the site.[147] The grove was reported to be growing faster than that of a native tree species that had been planted in an adjacent section of the property. In 2008, the 18-year-old redwoods were the same height as the stand of 38-year-old Douglas fir growing nearby. Current measurements report height growth of about 4 feet per year. The now 33-year-old redwoods are 135 feet tall.[147]

When asked about the farm's current goals in managing the grove of redwoods, the owner replied, “My only goal is to grow the tallest trees in the world.”[147]

The actions of the citizen group Propagation Nation became controversial in late 2023. In October, a lengthy New York Times Magazine article reported favorably on the group's distribution of redwood seedlings to tree farms, public parks, and private individuals in a broad region surrounding the city of Seattle.[134] In December, the Associated Press exclusively reported criticism from professionals in the region and nationally: While beginning to favor experiments in "assisted population migration" of the main native timber tree, Douglas-fir, professionals were united against large-scale plantings of California redwoods into the Pacific Northwest.[148] The next month, January 2024, carried a regional news article that, once again, showed strong support as well as bold statements by the group's founder.[149]

Northward plantings assist climate adaptation decisions

Private landowners, whether planting trees outside of native ranges for horticultural or commercial timber interests, are not by law required to seek governmental approval for doing so. Hence, the practice of visiting mature private or botanical garden plantings in order to assess the viability of intentional assisted migration of a tree species is not yet documented as standard practice. Thus far, the best-known example of documenting northward plantings pertains to a citizen group, Torreya Guardians,[150][151] justifying their actions in planting seeds of an officially listed endangered species of tree, Florida torreya, hundreds of miles northward.[152]

Diminishing fog along California's northern coast is already substantial,[153] and its consequences would make coast redwood increasingly "drought stressed under a summer climate of reduced fog frequency and greater evaporative demand."[154] Researchers have begun studying how diminishment of fog, owing to climate change, would make habitat unsuitable for Coast redwood in southern portions of their range.[155] Even in northern sections of current range, climate change could constrict habitability such that low slopes along rivers would become the final refugia.[156] Authors of the guest editorial in a 2021 issue of Journal of Ecology featured coast redwood in a concluding statement: "We expect that dominant tree species threatened within their range (e.g. coast redwood) would have to be translocated at a landscape level to protect overall habitat, ecosystem productivity and associated species."[157]

The sudden deaths of some previously healthy giant sequoias, which are native to the western slope of the

Castle Fire, swept through the region in 2020. The innate fire resistance of even the tallest and sturdiest sequoias[159] could not protect the groves. A tenth of the entire native population of giant sequoia is estimated to have been killed.[160] An interagency Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition formed in 2021, reporting that "giant sequoias are known for their resistance to insects and disease and their fire-adapted life cycle, however the 2012–2016 drought appears to have been a tipping point for giant sequoias and other Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests."[161]

Forest understory plants

Seeds of Florida torreya ripen to a purple color at this horticultural planting in eastern North Carolina.

Natural and healthy forests include a diversity of native

climate adaptation.[48]

Two genera,

critically endangered, however, and a citizen group called Torreya Guardians has been planting this species hundreds of kilometers north of its native range.[163][164][165]

Inadvertent assisted migration of ornamental understory plants

The evergreen southern magnolia is native to the southeastern US and bears the typical magnolia structure of fruit with fleshy seeds.

Native species of Magnolia in eastern North America have been widely planted for their ornamental beauty in horticultural contexts far north of their native ranges. Although nearly half of all Magnolia species are threatened globally, human-assisted movement and cultivation of some species have led to their survival and expansion far beyond native range. The ongoing naturalization of beyond-range Magnolia taxa has been associated with climate change.[166] Botanists have documented examples where such plantings have fully naturalized—that is, where nearby seedlings and saplings suggest that not only were viable seeds produced, but the habitat and climate were favorable for seedlings to establish and grow. These are examples of inadvertent assisted migration. Botanist Todd Rounsaville suggests, "There is an important need to study and report the ecological processes of tree naturalization in novel environments to guide policy making and forest management relating to climate change, species range-shifts, and assisted migration."[166]

One example is the

southern magnolia, Magnolia grandiflora. This small, evergreen tree is widely planted as an ornamental as far north as New England and Michigan. The tree tolerates those regions, which are far north of its native range along the coast of southeastern US. But no instances of full naturalization have been documented at such high latitudes. In 2011 botanists documented naturalization near Chapel Hill, North Carolina, which is more than a hundred kilometers beyond and inland of its northernmost native range in North Carolina.[167]

Magnolia tripetala in flower in northeast Alabama

Bigleaf magnolia, Magnolia macrophylla, another widely planted ornamental, has been documented as fully naturalized in the state of Connecticut. This is 130 kilometers northeast of its historically native range. Because climate models project severe contraction in the southerly portion of its native range, William Moorhead recommends that "additional sites for this conspicuous species should be sought in the area of similar climate conditions between Long Island and central Connecticut, such as along the northern coast of Long Island Sound and in the lower Hudson Valley."[168]

Umbrella magnolia, Magnolia tripetala, has been documented as naturalized in more than a dozen locations well north of its historic native range. Dispersal problems apparently limited its post-glacial range expansion to regions south of the farthest extent of continental ice. While horticultural plantings northward into Massachusetts as early as the 18th century demonstrated species tolerance for the then-climate, only recently have these old horticultural plantings begun to extend offspring into adjacent suitable habitat—becoming quite populous in even full-canopy forests, according to botanists Jesse Bellemare and Claudia Deeg. They write, "The pattern of relatively synchronous escape and establishment of this southern tree species in the last 20 to 30 years seems most consistent with a link to recent climatic warming in the northeastern US."[169]

Evidence and causes of lagging tree migration

Lonicera maackii, native in Asia, can shade out native canopy seedlings in the eastern USA, as in this regrowth forest in southern Michigan.

Forest habitat fragmentation caused by agriculture and residential development have long been recognized as impediments to the ability of plants to geographically track climate change.[170] Several additional human stressors are now also recognized as lessening the ability of trees to adapt to climate change by "migrating poleward."[171] One such stress is where native deer densities are abnormally high, owing to the absence of predators and landscape or management conditions that preclude human hunting at adequate scale. Under those conditions, tree species whose leaves and twigs are palatable to deer are unable to launch next generations, even when still well represented in the forest canopy.[172] Another stress derives from non-native invasive plants that can rapidly occupy a canopy opening, thereby shading out native tree seedlings that might otherwise have been able to establish.[171]

References

  1. ^
    PMID 22471079
    .
  2. ^ a b Halleaux, Savannah (April 6, 2023). "Traveling trees: Assisted migration for climate resilience". U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved April 12, 2023.
  3. ^ a b "Assisted Migration". Natural Resources Canada. Government of Canada. June 27, 2013. Retrieved July 20, 2021.
  4. doi:10.5558/tfc2011-091
    .
  5. PMID 25055023
    .
  6. ^ O'Neill, Gregory A; et al. "Assisted Migration to Address Climate Change in British Columbia: Recommendations for Interim Seed Transfer Standards (2008)" (PDF). Ministry of Forests and Range. Government of British Columbia. Retrieved July 22, 2021.
  7. ^ a b "Climate-Based Seed Transfer". Ministry of Forests and Range. Government of British Columbia. Retrieved July 20, 2021.
  8. ^ Leech, Susan March; Almuedo, Pedro Lara; O'Neill, Greg (2011). "Assisted Migration: Adapting Forest Management to a Changing Climate". BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management. 12 (3): 18–34.
  9. ^
    PMID 25567494
    .
  10. ^
    doi:10.5558/tfc2011-092
    .
  11. S2CID 225749363
    .
  12. doi:10.3390/f12050560
    .
  13. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121298
    .
  14. PMID 34517682
    .
  15. ^
    PMID 22471080
    .
  16. ^ St George, Zach (June 17, 2021). "As Climate Warms, a Rearrangement of World's Plant Life Looms". Yale Environment 360. Retrieved July 25, 2021.
  17. doi:10.1890/ES15-00203.1
    .
  18. hdl:11299/175075
    .
  19. ^ Seidman, Lila (October 7, 2021). "Hundreds of giant sequoias may have burned to death in KNP Complex, Windy fires". Los Angeles Times.
  20. ^ Canon, Gabrielle (October 3, 2021). "Giant sequoias and fire have coexisted for centuries. Climate crisis is upping the stakes". The Guardian.
  21. ^ a b Markham, Lauren (November 2021). "Can We Move Our Forests in Time to Save Them?". Mother Jones.
  22. ^ Valdes, Manuel (November 16, 2022). "As climate change progresses, trees in cities struggle". Phys.org.
  23. ^ a b c Gilles, Nathan (November 23, 2022). "Massive die-off hits fir trees across Pacific Northwest". Columbia Insight.
  24. ^ University of Washington (September 30, 2021). "Bigleaf maple decline tied to hotter, drier summers in Washington state". Phys.org.
  25. S2CID 240578025
    .
  26. ^ Gilles, Nathan (August 18, 2022). "Pac NW's 'trees of life' are dying. Now we know why". Columbia Insight.
  27. ^ Nowakowski, Teresa (March 10, 2023). "California's 'Zombie Forests' Are Cheating Death—but Maybe Not for Long". Smithsonian.
  28. PMID 36874277
    .
  29. ^
    S2CID 252883172
    .
  30. ^ a b Leech, Susan March; Almuedo, Pedro Lara; O'Neill, Greg (2011). "Assisted Migration: Adapting forest management to a changing climate" (PDF). BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management. 12 (3): 18–34. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
  31. ^
    S2CID 89200060
    .
  32. ^
    doi:10.5849/jof.13-016
    .
  33. ^ a b c Handler, Stephen; Pike, Carrie; St Clair, Brad; Abbotts, Hannah; Janowiak, Maria. "Assisted Migration: Synthesis prepared for the USDA Forest Service Climate Change Resource Center". Climate Change Resource Center. U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  34. PMID 27087852
    .
  35. ^ Vose, James M; Peterson, David L; Patel-Weynand, Toral. "Effects of Climatic Variability and Change on Forest Ecosystems: A Comprehensive Science Synthesis for the U.S. Forest Sector (Technical Report, December 2012)" (PDF). U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved August 21, 2021.
  36. ^
    doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.10
    .
  37. ^ "Forum: Assisted Migration of an Endangered Tree" (PDF). Wild Earth. 14. Winter 2004. Retrieved July 20, 2021.
  38. PMID 17391179
    .
  39. S2CID 43612242
    .
  40. S2CID 206512777
    .
  41. S2CID 84866686
    .
  42. ^ Barlow, Connie. "Assisted Migration or Assisted Colonization: What's In a Name? Chronological History of the Debate on Terminology". Torreya Guardians. Retrieved July 20, 2021.
  43. S2CID 154368627
    .
  44. PMID 11326089
    .
  45. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.009
    .
  46. S2CID 228929332
    .
  47. S2CID 233448828
    .
  48. ^
    doi:10.5558/tfc2011-090
    .
  49. doi:10.5558/tfc2011-089
    .
  50. ISSN 0022-1201
    .
  51. ^ Brandt, Leslie. "Chicago Wilderness Urban Forest Vulnerability Assessment and Synthesis" (2017). Climate Change Response Framework. U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved 26 July 2021. (Table on page 32.)
  52. PMID 21049870
    .
  53. S2CID 131656767
    .
  54. ^ Breining, Greg (September 2014). "Time for Trees to Pack Their Trunks?". Ensia (University of Minnesota). Retrieved March 28, 2022.
  55. PMID 21830704
    .
  56. ^ Swanston, Chris; Janowiak, Maria. "Forest Adaptation Resources: Climate Change Tools and Approaches for Land Managers (2012)" (PDF). Northern Research Station. U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved August 5, 2021.
  57. doi:10.3390/cli9050076
    .
  58. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.002
    .
  59. ^ a b Buranyi, Stephen (January 20, 2016). "How British Columbia Is Moving its Trees". Motherboard Tech by Vice, 2016. Vice. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  60. ^ "Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science". U.S. Department of Agriculture. U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved July 26, 2021.
  61. doi:10.5849/jof.13-094
    .
  62. S2CID 247766894
    .
  63. OCLC 61265580
    .
  64. ^ Harrington, Samantha (June 8, 2020). "By paying attention, tribes in the Northwoods are leading the way on climate change". Yale Climate Connections.
  65. S2CID 24171783
    .
  66. ^ Barlow, Connie. "Part 4. Decolonizing Scientific Language". Torreya Guardians. Retrieved July 20, 2021.
  67. S2CID 1623634
    .
  68. ^ Cooke, Rachel (June 19, 2021). "Interview: Robin Wall Kimmerer". The Guardian. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  69. ^ Thompson, Joanna (October 12, 2023). "Assisted Migration Helps Animals Adapt to Climate Change". Sierra Magazine.
  70. ^ "Collaborative Projects with Indigenous and Tribal Partners". Center for Native Peoples and the Environment. State University of New York, Syracuse. Retrieved March 9, 2023.
  71. ^ Center for Native Peoples and the Environment. "2016 Annual Report" (PDF). SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. State University of New York, Syracuse. Retrieved October 4, 2022.
  72. ^ Kimball, Jill (November 5, 2022). "'Braiding Sweetgrass' author: 'We haven't loved the land enough'". News from Brown University. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
  73. ^ "Tribal Nations Capacity Building". U.S. Climate Resilience Toolkit. U.S. Government. Retrieved September 13, 2021.
  74. ^ Eisenberg, Cristina; Prichard, Susan; Nelson, Michael Paul; Hessburg, Paul. "Braiding Indigenous and Western Knowledge for Climate-Adapted Forests: An Ecocultural State of Science Report (2024)" (PDF). FLAME Lab. University of Washington. Retrieved April 14, 2024.
  75. ^ a b Tribal Adaptation Menu Team. "Dibaginjigaadeg Anishinaabe Ezhitwaad: A Tribal Climate Adaptation Menu, 2019". Climate Change Response Framework. Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  76. ^ House, Kelly (May 3, 2021). "As northern Michigan warms, scientists bring tree seedlings from the south". Michigan Bridge. Archived from the original on May 4, 2021. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  77. ^ Mucioki, Megan (October 8, 2021). "Keeping a Detailed Record of the Changing Climate Could Save this Tribe's Foodways". Civil Eats.
  78. PMID 33500421
    .
  79. doi:10.5558/tfc85258-2
    .
  80. S2CID 26915838
    .
  81. ^ "What will climate change do to Alberta Forests?". FRI Research. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  82. ^ "Tree Improvement and Adaptation Programs" (PDF). Province of Alberta. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  83. ^ "Managed forests and climate change". Province of Ontario. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  84. ^
    ISSN 0264-8377
    .
  85. ^ Hett, Hanna (August 30, 2022). "Forests can't adapt to climate change fast enough. So humans are trying to help". Canada's National Observer.
  86. S2CID 15069899
    .
  87. ^ "Adaptation". U.S. Department of Agriculture. U.S. Forest Service. July 31, 2017. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  88. ^ "Plant Species and Climate Profile Predictions". Virginia Tech. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  89. ^ Climate Change Resource Center. "Plant Species and Climate Profile Predictions". USDA. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
  90. S2CID 9030856
    .
  91. ^ Climate Change Resource Center. "Climate Change Tree Atlas". USDA. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
  92. doi:10.2737/RMRS-GTR-165
    .
  93. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.023
    .
  94. ^ "Seedlot Selection Tool". seedlotselectiontool.org. Retrieved March 15, 2022.
  95. ^ "CBST Seedlot Selection Tool Version 6.0". maps.forsite.ca. Retrieved March 15, 2022.
  96. ^ "Climate-Adapted Seed Tool". reforestationtools.org. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
  97. doi:10.1093/jofore/fvaa013
    .
  98. ^ "Eastern Seed Zone Forum". Eastern Seed Zones. U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved April 2, 2022.
  99. doi:10.3389/ffgc.2024.1325264
    .
  100. ^
    S2CID 154285038
    .
  101. PMID 22471079
    .
  102. doi:10.1093/forsci/fxz024
    .
  103. ^
    doi:10.3390/f12010009
    .
  104. S2CID 146863103
    .
  105. ^ Zimmer, Carl (January 13, 2023). "For Trees Under Threat, Flight May Be Best Response". The New York Times. New York Times.
  106. ^ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (December 15, 2022). "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule for Whitebark Pine (Pinus albicaulis)" (PDF). Federal Register. 87 (240): 76882–76917.
  107. ^ Center for Biological Diversity. "Whitebark Pine Protected as Threatened Under Endangered Species Act". Retrieved January 13, 2023.
  108. ^ a b Robbins, Jim (January 11, 2024). "The Beleaguered Whitebark Pine Is in Trouble. Can It Be Saved?". Yale Environment 360.
  109. ^ "Partners and Projects". Whitebark Pine Ecosystem Foundation. Retrieved January 29, 2024.
  110. ^ Paz, Fátima (June 18, 2014). "En espera de aprobación de la Profepa por tala ilegal en la Reserva de la Mariposa Monarca" Archived 2014-09-03 at the Wayback Machine. cambiodemichoacan.com.mx
  111. ^
    S2CID 219081722
    .
  112. doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00421
    .
  113. ^ Duran, Thelma Gomez (January 17, 2022). "Here's how science is trying to conserve the monarch butterfly's forests". Mongabay. Retrieved January 25, 2022.
  114. ^ "Adaptive Silviculture for Climate Change". AdaptiveSilviculture. Retrieved March 31, 2024.
  115. ^ "Experimental Network for Assisted Migration and Establishment Silviculture (ENAMES)". Pacific Northwest Research Station. U.S. Department of Agriculture. February 27, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2024.
  116. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1981
    .
  117. S2CID 202041429
    .
  118. ^ "Petawawa Research Forest: Management Goals and Treatments". Adaptive Silviculture for Climate Change. Retrieved July 23, 2021.
  119. ^ Mura, Claudio; Raymond, Patricia; Rossi, Sergio (May 3, 2023). "How to move without legs or wings: Helping trees migrate to new regions". The Conversation.
  120. ^ Williams, Jeannie (January 15, 2020). "Conservation Easement Landowner Newsletter, 2019". Leelanau Conservancy. Retrieved July 26, 2021.
  121. ^ McWhirter, Sheri (April 30, 2023). "'If trees had feet': Tree migration brings climate resiliency to Michigan forests". Michigan Live.
  122. ^ Dennis, Brady (April 29, 2020). "In Fast-Warming Minnesota, Scientists Are Trying to Plant the Forests of the Future". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
  123. ^ a b Breining, Greg (March–April 2022). "New Forest for a New Climate". Minnesota Conservation Volunteer Magazine. Retrieved March 24, 2022.
  124. ^ Cusick, Daniel (May 5, 2023). "Forest Service Explores Moving Trees to Save Them from Hotter Weather". Scientific American. E&E News.
  125. ^ U.S. Forest Service. "Superior National Forest Assisted Migration Plan (2023)" (PDF). U.S. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
  126. doi:10.1002/ecs2.4260
    .
  127. ^ Bain, Lisa (August 18, 2023). "At St. Paul's Crosby Farm Park, see the future of Minnesota forests". Minneapolis Star Tribune.
  128. ^ "Adaptive Restoration at Stossel Creek". Northwest Natural Resource Group. January 30, 2020. Retrieved August 17, 2021.
  129. ^ "Stossel Creek Case Study: Adaptive Restoration for Pacific Northwest Forests" (PDF). Northwest Natural Resource Group. Retrieved August 17, 2021.
  130. ^ Gilles, Nathan (September 15, 2022). "The Forest Service is experimenting with relocating tree species to save them from climate change". Columbia Insight.
  131. ^ Braybrook, Rowan (August 3, 2021). "Moving Trees: Definitions and Ethics of Assisted Migration". Northwest Natural Resource Group. Retrieved August 18, 2021.
  132. PMID 24112110
    .
  133. ^ Myers, John (June 24, 2023). "As emerald ash borers decimate trees, new forest planted to replace them". Duluth News Tribune.
  134. ^ a b Velasquez-Manoff, Moises (October 25, 2023). "Can We Save the Redwoods by Helping Them Move?". The New York Times. New York Times Magazine.
  135. ^ Opong, Diana; Anderson, Hans (November 9, 2023). "One man's mission to save the California redwoods by bringing them to the Pacific Northwest". KUOW.
  136. ^ Gilles, Nathan (December 28, 2023). "What is 'assisted migration' and what are the risks?". Columbia Insight.
  137. doi:10.5558/tfc2024-003
    .
  138. doi:10.1890/070063
    .
  139. doi:10.3119/16-10
    .
  140. ^ Marinelli, Janet (April 19, 2016). "As World Warms, How Do We Decide When a Plant is Native?". Yale Environment 360.
  141. ^ Lindley, J.Buchholz (1939). "Sequoiadendron giganteum (giant sequoia) description". www.conifers.org. The Gymnosperm Database. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011. Retrieved January 15, 2022.
  142. OCLC 41531630.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link
    )
  143. ^ "Blue Giant Sequoia". Urban Forest Nursery Inc. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved January 15, 2022.
  144. ^
    ISBN 9780660458618
    . Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  145. ^ Barlow, Connie. "Climate, Trees, and Legacy: Videos toward assisted migration". The Great Story. Retrieved July 23, 2021.
  146. ^ Hammock, Dan (March 31, 2021). "1,700 giant sequoia, redwood seedlings distributed at Elma event". Sound Publishing (Everett, Washington). The Daily World.
  147. ^ a b c PropagationNation staff (September 27, 2023). "Coast Redwoods Thriving at Washington Tree Farm". PropagationNation. Retrieved September 28, 2023.
  148. ^ Gilles, Nathan (December 28, 2023). "As tree species face decline, 'assisted migration' gains popularity in Pacific Northwest". Associated Press News.
  149. ^ Zhou, Amanda (January 21, 2024). "Do redwood trees have a place in the future of WA's forests? They're already here". Seattle Times.
  150. PMID 29219970
    .
  151. ^ Ste-Marie, Catherine. "Adapting Sustainable Forest Management to Climate Change: A review of assisted tree migration and its potential role in adapting sustainable forest management to climate change" (PDF). Canadian Council of Forest Ministers.
  152. ^ "Evaluation of a Petition To Downlist Florida Torreya" (PDF). Federal Register. 86 (186): 53939. September 29, 2021.
  153. ^ Romero, Ezra David (September 1, 2020). "Coastal Fog — Or The Lack Of It — Could Be A Wildfire Risk". CapRadio. Retrieved July 30, 2021.
  154. PMID 20160112
    .
  155. S2CID 33170732
    .
  156. S2CID 225716384
    .
  157. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13715
    .
  158. ^ Greenfield, Patrick (January 18, 2020). "'This is not how sequoias die: It's supposed to stand for another 500 years'". The Guardian.
  159. ^ Quammen, David (December 1, 2012). "Forest Giant". nationalgeographic.com. Archived from the original on October 3, 2021. Retrieved January 14, 2022.
  160. ^ Herrera, Jack (June 3, 2021). "'Mind-blowing': tenth of world's giant sequoias may have been destroyed by a single fire". The Guardian. Retrieved July 23, 2021.
  161. ^ "Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition". Sequoia and Kings Canyon. U.S. National Park Service. Retrieved August 4, 2021.
  162. S2CID 230577774
    .
  163. PMID 29219970
    .
  164. S2CID 222320826
    .
  165. ^ Schipani, Sam (October 4, 2018). "Scrappy Group of Citizen Scientists Rallies Around One of World's Rarest Trees". Earth Island Journal.
  166. ^
    S2CID 219078456
    .
  167. S2CID 84283082
    .
  168. S2CID 90467493
    .
  169. S2CID 86153619
    .
  170. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00346.x
    .
  171. ^
    doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13375
    .
  172. S2CID 240290783
    .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assisted_migration_of_forests_in_North_America&oldid=1220157481"