Revolt Against the Modern World

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Revolt Against the Modern World
OCLC
5930915
This article is part of a series on
Conservatism in Italy
Ideologies
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Politicians
Parties
Active

Defunct

Think tanks
Media
Related topics

Revolt Against the Modern World (

modern world
, contrasting its characteristics with those of traditional societies: from politics and institutions to views on life and death. Evola denounces the regressive aspects of modern civilisation, and instead argues for a traditionalist society.

Rivolta contro il mondo moderno was published in

Inner Traditions. It has also been translated into German, Spanish, French, Serbian and Hungarian.[2] It is known as a cult book in the extreme right circles.[3] The book influenced Mircea Eliade and other thinkers in the Traditionalist school, as well as the European Nouvelle Droite.[4]

Contents

Revolt Against the Modern World is divided into two parts: The World of Tradition, and Genesis and the Face of the Modern World.[5]

The first part, the world of tradition, is a comparative study of the doctrines of traditional civilizations where Evola indicates that the fundamental principles of the life of traditional man are manifested in the doctrine of two natures, the existence of a physical order and a

involution
.

Evola begins the second chapter of Revolt against the Modern World stating that the traditional world is never perfectly realized in history. According to Evola, the key to tradition and what he supposes was the defining feature of the traditional world, was the experiential knowledge of the two natures: high and low, being and becoming, supernatural and natural. Then, Evola leads to promote the beneficial qualities of historical societies that embodied tradition: "The traditional world knew divine kingship. It knew the bridge between the two worlds, namely, initiation; it knew the two great ways of approaching the transcendent, namely, heroic action and contemplation. It knew the moral foundation, namely, the traditional law and the caste system; and it knew the political earthly symbol, namely, the empire."[7]

From this, Evola concludes that the traditional world had no defining ethics so therefore, it had no theory of any kind. Without theory, there was no learning of such theory and without learning, no progress. Evola explains how any progress or change from these traditional societies is involution rather than evolution, the study of history is only the study of decay. Evola appreciates how due to this, in traditional societies there was only adherence to the primordialism, a single ethnic identity, which he believes has been lost due to modernity.[8][page needed]

Once Evola characterizes traditional societies, he proceeds to dive into his metaphysical views of gender roles. As Evola divides the universe between above and below, he relates this to the supernatural and the natural. According to Evola, women are natural and men are supernatural. The male is self-subsistent while the female is dependent. In Evola's worldview, the role of the female is to be a mother and a lover, while the male's sole role is in war.[7] Evola justifies his idiosyncratic views on gender roles by relating it to Hinduism and Taoism.[9][10][11]

References

  1. ^ Horowitz 2017.
  2. ^ "Rivolta contro il mondo moderno". Julius Evola Bibliography. Arrakis. Archived from the original on 15 May 2011. Retrieved 9 September 2015.
  3. ^ Drake 1986, p. 64.
  4. ^ Wolff 2016, pp. 478–494.
  5. ^ Julius Evola, Il cammino del cinabro, Milano, Scheiwiller, 1963, p. 71.
  6. ^ Sheehan 1981, pp. 45–73.
  7. ^ a b Evola 1995.
  8. ^ Furlong 2011.
  9. ISBN 9780816626519
    .
  10. ^ R. Ben-Ghiat, M. Fuller. Italian Colonialism. Springer, 2016. p. 149
  11. ISBN 9781570270390
    . Retrieved 11 January 2020.

Bibliography

Further reading
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Revolt_Against_the_Modern_World&oldid=1192964760"