Svetlana-class cruiser

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Krasny Krym at anchor in 1943
Class overview
NameSvetlana class
Builders
Operators Soviet Navy
Preceded byMuraviev Amurski class
Succeeded byAdmiral Nakhimov class
Cost8,300,000 rubles
Built1913–28
In commission1928–58
Planned4
Completed3 (1 completed as a cruiser)
Cancelled1
Lost1
Scrapped2
General characteristics (as designed)
TypeLight cruiser
Displacement6,860 t (6,750 long tons) (standard)
Length158.4 m (519 ft 8 in)
Beam15.3 m (50 ft 2 in)
Draught5.56 m (18 ft 3 in)
Installed power
Propulsion4 × shafts; 4 × direct-drive steam turbines
Speed29.5 knots (54.6 km/h; 33.9 mph)
Complement630
Armament
Armor

The Svetlana-class cruiser was the first

class of light cruisers built for the Imperial Russian Navy (IRN) during the 1910s. Construction was interrupted by World War I, the Russian Revolution and the Russian Civil War. Only Svetlana of the quartet was completed by the Soviet Union as a cruiser, two were converted to oil tankers, and the remaining ship was scrapped
without being completed.

Svetlana, now renamed Profintern, became fully operational in 1928 and was transferred to the

decommissioned
in 1958 and broken up two years later.

Background and design

The

dreadnought battleships, but the IRN lacked modern cruisers and destroyers. Several years after the first Gangut-class battleships were ordered, the navy finally gained approval for four light cruisers as part of the 1912–1916 shipbuilding program to scout for the capital ships and to lead destroyer flotillas. Design work for the ships had begun as back as 1907, but it took the IRN several iterations between alternating specifications and designs to decide what was feasible. In early 1912 it conducted a design contest for a 4,100–5,100-metric-ton (4,000–5,000-long-ton) ship armed with a dozen 55-caliber 130-millimeter (5.1 in) Pattern 1913 guns, capable of a speed of 30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph), and protected by some side armor. Other important requirements were a strong resemblance to the dreadnoughts under construction and the ability to lay mines. None of the submissions were entirely satisfactory, and the shipyards were asked for new, larger, designs. The navy combined the submissions from the Russo-Baltic and Putilov Shipyards for a 6,700-metric-ton (6,600-long-ton) design in November. In February 1913, the IRN needed to divert some money from the cruisers to pay for the Borodino-class battlecruisers and the shipyards agreed to reduce the price from 9,660,000 rubles, excluding guns and armor, to 8,300,000 rubles in exchange for reducing the speed to 29.5 knots (54.6 km/h; 33.9 mph); the navy then ordered two ships from each yard on 13 February. Late changes to the design, including the addition of Frahm anti-roll tanks and provision for a seaplane, added several hundred extra tons to the displacement.[1]

The Svetlana-class ships had an

kW), which would propel the ship at 29.5 knots; those for Svetlana and Admiral Greig were ordered from AG Vulcan Stettin in Germany (Admiral Greig subcontracted to Blohm+Voss). These were not delivered owing to the outbreak of World War I, and those intended for Svetlana were used to engine the German Brummer-class cruisers. As a result, new engines had to be ordered from the UK; this delayed Svetlana, and probably prevented Greig's completion as a cruiser.[4] The ships carried 1,167 long tons (1,186 t) of fuel oil. Their crew consisted of approximately 630 officers and crewmen.[2]

The increase in size of the Svetlanas during the design process allowed their main armament to be increased from 12 to 15 Pattern 1913 guns in single mounts. Six of the 10 guns on the main

anti-aircraft (AA) guns, although their maximum elevation was limited to +75°,[8] two submerged 450 mm (17.7 in) torpedo tubes and could carry 100 mines. During construction, Svetlana's AA guns were replaced by 30-caliber 76.2-millimetre (3.00 in) Lender AA guns and the rest of the ships were intended to receive 102-millimetre (4.0 in) AA guns.[2]

The waterline belt of the Svetlana-class ships was 76 millimeters thick. It extended the whole length of the hull and covered from the lower deck to 0.91 meters (3 ft) below the waterline. Above it was a 25-millimeter (0.98 in) strake of armor that covered the area between the lower and main decks. Those decks were each 20 millimeters (0.79 in) thick and the funnel uptakes were protected by 25 millimeters of armor. The walls of the conning tower were 76 millimeters thick while the gun shields protecting the 130-millimeter guns were 25 millimeters thick.[2]

Ships

Construction data
Name Russian Builder[9]
Laid down[9]
Launched[9] Commissioned[9] Fate
Krasny Krym
(ex-Svetlana, ex-Profintern)
Красный Крым, Светлана, Профинтерн Russo-Baltic Shipyard, Reval (now Tallinn), Estonia 7 December 1913 27 November 1915 1 July 1928 Scrapped, July 1959
SS Azneft
(ex-Admiral Greig)
Адмирал Грейг 7 November 1913 9 December 1916 24 December 1926
Admiral Butakov Адмирал Бутаков Putilov Shipyard, Saint Petersburg 29 November 1913 5 August 1916 Scrapped incomplete
SS Grozneft
(ex-Admiral Spiridov)
Адмирал Спиридов 9 September 1916 24 December 1926

Service

Svetlana and her sister ships were evacuated to

Siege of Odessa, the Siege of Sevastopol, and the Kerch-Feodosiya Operation in the winter of 1941–1942. The ship was reclassified as a training ship in 1945 and was decommissioned in 1958 before being scrapped in 1960.[13]

Admiral Spiridov and Admiral Greig were converted into diesel-powered oil tankers during the 1920s and were renamed Grozneft and Azneft respectively. They were subsequently transferred to the

Neva River at Saint Petersburg before being broken up in 1952.[14]

Notes

  1. ^ Westwood, pp. 89–91
  2. ^ a b c d Gardiner & Grey, p. 305
  3. ^ Dodson and Nottelmann, p. 190
  4. ^ Dodson & Nottelmann, p. 190–91
  5. ^ Meister, pp. 34–35
  6. ^ Friedman, p. 262
  7. ^ Campbell, p. 361
  8. ^ Friedman, pp. 264
  9. ^ a b c d Watts, p. 103
  10. ^ a b Budzbon 1985, p. 306
  11. ^ Breyer, pp. 117, 165
  12. ^ Breyer, p. 165
  13. ^ Budzbon 1980, p. 326
  14. ^ a b Meister, p. 31

References