User talk:97198/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Your GA nomination of Bad Words (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bad Words (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Begin Again (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sock -- Sock (talk) 19:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter

Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs
)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from
the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Miyagawa (talk) 20:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bad Words (film)

The article Bad Words (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bad Words (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IdeaLab proposal

There is a proposal at the IdeaLab that may interest you. Lightbreather (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Big Girls Don't Cry (book)

The article Big Girls Don't Cry (book) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Big Girls Don't Cry (book) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 23:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Test Kaffeeklatsch area for women-only

Since WikiProject Women as proposed at the IdeaLab may take some time to realize, and based on a discussion on the proposal's talk page, I have started a test Kaffeeklatsch area for women only (cisgender or trans-woman, regardless of sexual orientation).

It is a place where women can go and be sure they'll be able to participate in discussions without being dominated by men's advice, criticism, and explanations. If interested, your participation would be most welcome. Lightbreather (talk) 23:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hans Rosenfeldt

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK nomination of John Gilroy (film editor)

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

DYK image question

Hi,

I saw you moved Template:Did you know nominations/Interference Archive to prep6. I don't feel like I have a great grasp of what determines which among the hooks is the one displayed with an image. Is there a discussion thread somewhere? Thanks --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rhododendrites, as you'll see on the main page, every set of eight DYK hooks has only one picture, which means only 1 in 8 promoted hooks runs with a picture. Since the proportion of nominations with pictures is much higher than that, some of them have to run without pictures. It's basically a judgment call when it comes to choosing which hooks should take the top "pictured" spot. There isn't a hard-and-fast rule for choosing them but personally, I try to choose hooks where the picture looks especially good at a small size and the picture is of the bolded topic itself. The hook/article you mentioned has a great picture but I didn't promote it because it isn't very clear at the size of a thumbnail. Hope that helps! 97198 (talk) 02:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for explaining. If I were comparing the one selected and the one I added, I would've probably picked the other one, too :) I just didn't know how that decision was made. It's unusual to have a relatively high-visibility selection process occur sans collaboration on Wikipedia, so I figured I must be missing something. So it's basically on the person who promotes it and assembles some hooks in a given prep area? --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you that it's an unusual process given how things generally work on Wikipedia. It's basically the decision of the person who assembles the prep area, but it's by no means definitive or final – other users are free to (and frequently do) switch hooks around in the prep areas and there are often discussions raised at
WT:DYK when someone disagrees with the way a prep has been assembled. 97198 (talk) 03:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 12:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

A Dobos torte for you!

Dobos Torte
to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen () 09:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lucy Alibar

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy (talk) 19:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

DYK for Masanobu Takayanagi

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Instinct (Orphan Black)

The article Instinct (Orphan Black) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Instinct (Orphan Black) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Anne Rosellini

Allen3 talk 01:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK question

Hey, I notice that you promoted the German Concentration Camps Factual Survey article to the prep area, and I was wondering: is it too late (or desirable) to add a photo of Alfred Hitchcock? There is one in the article that can be used. tx, Coretheapple (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@
WT:DYK and ask them to change it. Hope that helps. 97198 (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Oh no problem. We'll just let it proceed. Thanks very much! Coretheapple (talk) 02:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bruna Papandrea

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Instinct (Orphan Black)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Adam Arkapaw

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Presentation proposal for Wikimania 2015

How to pick up more women...
Hello to the members of WikiProject Women writers!
Wikimania 2015. It's titled, How to pick up more women -- as in more women editors and more women's biographies. The proposal review process has begun and there's no guarantee that this proposal will be accepted. That's where you come in. Please review our proposal and give us feedback. Ultimately, we hope you add your name to the signup at the bottom of the proposal which signifies you're interested in the talk (it does not signify you'll be attending the event). Thank you! Rosiestep (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

DYK for Eric Gautier

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Sierra Leone at the 2004 Summer Olympics DYK

Thanks for promoting the Sierra Leone at the 2004 Summer Olympics DYK. However, I think that the hook that Relentlessly suggested is better than my one. Can you replace it? Thanks. good888 (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Good888: I must not have seen the alt hook when I was promoting it. I agree with you, and I've changed it now. :) 97198 (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Melanie Oliver

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply