User talk:Sgnpkd

Sweet! Thanks. It's a very interesting satellite image. I'm sure the Ancient Aliens folks are already stirring up wild stories about it. They just can't help themselves but concoct their loony fringe stuff that sadly is broadcasted by none other than the once credible History Channel. Cheers.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 03:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hutong may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Many such ''hutong''-like areas have been demolished.]]During the period of the [[Republic of China]] from 1911 to 1948, society was unstable, fraught

Thanks,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sgnpkd. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to Lam Sơn uprising, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 12:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sgnpkd, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Eastern Zone massacres have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is
  Wikipedia:Copy-paste
  .
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Sgnpkd, thanks for creating Po Klong Garai!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Boleyn (talk) 20:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to the above? Please see

WP:BURDEN. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, I find no source, I simply transfer the information from the Po Klong Garai temple page, the page was misnomed, which also has no soucre. Sgnpkd (talk) 20:28, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering were your addition "In Vietnam, the script is known as Chữ Nôm Nùng, meaning the Chữ Nôm of Nung people." comes from? Johnkn63 (talk) 09:33, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, from common knowledge? Sgnpkd (talk) 10:31, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For wikipedia need verifiable content. "Knowledge" without a source would be original research. As to Sawndip characters in Vietnam, characters in Unicode are described as being

Tay characters in documents. Find a source for your addition and it can be added. However, you should also consider where to add material to a page- the introduction should reflect the content of the rest of the page.Johnkn63 (talk) 03:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, Tay and Nung or Zhuang are the same people, in Vietnam, Tay and Nung are just two names of the same people due to Nung being re-immigrate to Vietnam at a later time. About the reference, would a Vietnamese language source taken from Vietnamese wiki be ok? Sgnpkd (talk) 18:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The wikipedia article by itself not be enough, for several reasons. Here we are talking about writing systems, not people groups, so just showing two groups are related does not mean they use the same writing system. Translating from a related wikipedia is allowed, though must be done with care with regard to context, however there is no Vietnamese article on Sawndip. The closest thing I can find in the vietnamese wiki is "Người Nùng dùng chữ Hán hay chữ Nôm Nùng (được phát triển khoảng thế kỷ 17) để ghi chép thơ ca và truyện cổ dân gian." with the reference 'Viện Dân tộc học (1983). Sổ tay về các dân tộc ở Việt Nam. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Khoa học Xã hội. tr. 135.' on https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Người_Nùng but it has Chữ Nôm Tráng as separate topic. Wilipedia has a

No Original Research rule, which means that one needs to find a reliable source that says what you wish to add. There needs to be a source that says it clearly, it is not permitted to combine sources to reach a new conclusion. So really one has to look outside of wikipedia.Johnkn63 (talk) 02:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Found a sentance in David Holm's "Mapping the Old Zhuang Character Script" page one that includes Vietnamese usage. https://brill.com/abstract/book/9789004242166/B9789004242166_002.xml .Johnkn63 (talk) 07:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shophouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kampot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Sgnpkd, thanks for creating Mekong Housing Bank!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Meatsgains^(talk) 17:07, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sgnpkd. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Hon Khoai.

Please provide references for any articles you create, or any additions you make to existing articles.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please add citation for your edit [1] otherwise it can be challenged and removed. Regards, Nittawinoda (talk) 17:52, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sgnpkd,

Thanks for creating

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Shambhala into Gleb Bokii. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the Great Wall of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaoyang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xianbei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donghu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hey- in August, you deleted the English-language term 'Ch’ung-ch’ing' on the Chongqing page and replaced it with 'Congqin' (here: [2]). I don't know what your source is for Congqin (although it does pass my 'smell test' as a likely form of the name of the city in local dialect). If you have some source for that spelling of the name being used in an English-language context in reference to Chongqing, I'd love to see it. However, I would like to also say that we know with 100% certainty that Chongqing has been called Ch’ung-ch’ing in the English language. (References: World Book Encyclopedia 2003 vol 3 page 521", also spelled Chungking or Ch’ung-ch’ing,"; Reader's Digest Great World Atlas Pleasantville, New York 1963 p131 C h "CHUNGKING" & index page 198 "Chungking, China"; [3] "CH’UNG-CH’ING (CHUNGKING) 重慶") Thanks for your work! Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:50, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, both Chung-ching and Chongqing are same Putonghua pronunciation. Only differs in romanization systems, they are pronounced identically, that's why I think it's a duplicate. Chungking is the old name, which used Nanjing Mandarin pronunciation. Congqin is the name in local Sichuanese Mandarin, written in pinyin. It is pronounced like tzong-chin. Sorry for late reply. Sgnpkd (talk) 17:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited No man's land, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varosha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gyalrong people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jinchuan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:21, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wa State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lahu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Mekong Delta drought, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cambodian genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kampong Cham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of Wikipedia people—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Dan Koehl (talk) 03:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bo people (China) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gong County

Sango language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Creole

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yunnan under Ming rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baoshan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tibetan people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balti.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The recent situations in Da Nang is not a third wave according to this source: Vietnam had one of the world’s best COVID responses. Now that success is in peril

Second wave in Vietnam [4] Sgnpkd (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bạn gửi mình nguồn tiếng Việt thì bạn là người Việt à? Nếu là người Việt với nhau thì nói chuyện bằng tiếng mẹ đẻ luôn cho tiện:))))

talk) 16:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Bạn có thể đọc lại nguồn, báo nói là giai đoạn 2, không hề nói đến làn sóng thứ 2. Hai thứ này hoàn toàn không liên quan đến nhau.

talk) 16:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

History of Xinjiang

added links pointing to Ili and Aksu

Xinjiang under Qing rule

added links pointing to Ili and Aksu

List of soft drinks by country

added a link pointing to Sarsaparilla

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sgnpkd, I saw you moved the article

Thank you for the valuable explanations. Sgnpkd (talk) 05:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gelao people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Đồng Văn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Doklam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Congolese Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katanga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Garden city movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hoa people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teochew.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mạc dynasty

added a link pointing to Trần Cảo

Mạc Đăng Dung

added a link pointing to Trần Cảo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mekong Delta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brittanya Karma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brittanya Karma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:10, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sgnpkd! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 07:10, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shangri-La City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan language.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Wuhan Institute of Virology shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation goes before the citation, not after (contrary to styles commonly found in academic papers). All the best,

Thanks Sgnpkd (talk) 17:00, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bronze drum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Insurgency in Northeast India

added a link pointing to Taga

National Socialist Council of Nagaland

added a link pointing to Taga

Six Heretical Teachers

added a link pointing to Dualism

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hara Huna Kingdom

added a link pointing to Huna

Mantsi language

added a link pointing to Đồng Văn

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you add sources for your recent edits to Unrecognized ethnic groups in China? If a (Chinese) wikipedia page for them exists then you can just take over a source from there, and if a group doesn't have an article then it would definitely need a source or a {{cn}} tag. Thank you. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They all have a cn source from the chinese wiki. Sgnpkd (talk) 21:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mekong expedition of 1866–1868, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in edits about, and articles related to,

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Lô Lô people
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Lô Lô people, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

talk) 16:53, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

There is a move request now on

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spillover of the Tigray War, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Afar and Amhara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red River (Asia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nanjian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hindu cosmology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sgnpkd. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russification of Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hetmanate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:China-Japan International Ferry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:China-Japan International Ferry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 17:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Islamist insurgency in the Sahel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate of

Insurgency in the Maghreb

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 13:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siddi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abyssinian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BYD.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent edit on the 2022 Russina invasion article. The section you edited was originally written with keeping the active fronts at the top of the section and the inactive fronts below them. Could the article maintain the original sequence of fronts for phase two of the invasion. ErnestKrause (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to introduce the term 'causus belli', and the removal of section headings appears to have altered the chronological sequence of the presentation of events in that section. I'm reverting at this time to return the chronological dating as it was. The use of your Latin phrase does not appear consistent with the coverage in the international press which follows Russia's declaration of 'special military operations' and not the declaration of war. I'm reverting the section title as well for these reasons. ErnestKrause (talk) 11:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Sgnpkd. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please indicate how this company is notable. As a corporation, the required notability requirements can be found at

WP:ORGCRIT

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:China-Japan International Ferry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 19:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Măng Đen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Buddhism in Russia

added a link pointing to Chita

Tibetan Buddhism

added a link pointing to Lahaul and Spiti

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buddhism in Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chita.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luostari/Pechenga (air base), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zapolyarny.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:China-Japan International Ferry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 07:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King Wuling of Zhao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guangzong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emperor of China, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Later Han, Later Liang and Later Jin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huicheng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page She County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China–Myanmar border, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Namhkam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lê dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lam Sơn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Hoa people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bình Thuận.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fuxi

added a link pointing to Ketu

Nüwa

added a link pointing to Ketu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Milktaco per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Milktaco. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 15:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sgnpkd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not Milktaco and I'm not using any other account Sgnpkd (talk) 17:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I've been reviewing the data (both what's publicly visible and what's restricted to checkusers) and I've come to the conclusion that I'm no longer convinced Sgnpkd is Milktaco. There's extensive editing overlap, but this could plausibly be explained by shared interest in certain topic areas. There's also extensive technical similarities (the details of which I can't divulge) but these too could be plausibly explained by use of the same VPN service. In short, I can't be sure, so I'm going to

WP:AGF and unblock this account. My apologies for the inconvenience. RoySmith (talk) 16:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

(Non-administrator comment) Simple denial is not enough for us to believe what you are thinking. You still must address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Milktaco. SG5536B (my talk page | my contribs) 01:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it was confirmed by technical (Checkuser) evidence that Milktaco = Sgnpkd. How can you even claim that you are not sockpuppeting? SG5536B (my talk page | my contribs) 07:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how it got there but I've been a user since the 2000s, I'm not affiliated with that user by any means. I've been using VPN recently and maybe it has been affecting the result? Other than what should I do to prove I'm not sock-puppeting? Sgnpkd (talk) 09:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to acknowledge that I'm aware of this appeal and the case is being discussed off-wiki with other CUs. RoySmith (talk) 18:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOCKBLOCK and the section below it (Checkuser blocks) for more information. You may also want to describe how you editing pattern and behavior may be similar to that of the sockmaster, if so. SG5536B (my talk page | my contribs) 01:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi. I took a look at Miltakco contribs but it seems he was unactive since 2017 so I suppose the investigation was working on his socks, so someone with a certain characteristic of excessive use of quotations and interest on the topic of the relations, oftenly sexually-oriented? between nationalities in ancient China. I think I have came accross this user before and have even edited out some of his excessive quotations in many occassions (Here: [5] and here: [6]) but again, I'm not him. I have only been editing sporadically mainly in East Asian history and ethnography topics. (See my contributions in wiki commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Sgnpkd)

I'm not entirely sure how Checkuser works so I'd appreciate if the admins and technicals would take a look of it. Thank you. Sgnpkd (talk) 15:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the swift unblock! Sgnpkd (talk) 16:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muong people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thổ language.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I appreciate that you're trying to be helpful by adding different readings of the character 僚 to the intro of Rau peoples. However, the reading liáo is not used for the people group. The people are called Lǎo in Mandarin (see Pronunciation 3 in the Wiktionary entry). This name was originally written with the derogatory character 䝤, but the character was replaced with the more neutral 僚. Even though 僚 is normally read as liáo, when used to refer to the people group, the name is still lǎo. Zhen Zhen (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 19:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]