Asama-class cruiser

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Asama in 1900
Asama in 1900
Class overview
NameAsama class
BuildersArmstrong Whitworth, United Kingdom
Operators Imperial Japanese Navy
Preceded byNone
Succeeded byIzumo class
Built1897–1899
In commission1899–1945
Completed2
Scrapped2
General characteristics
TypeArmored cruiser
Displacement9,514–9,557 long tons (9,667–9,710 t)
Length442 ft 0 in (134.72 m) (o/a)
Beam67 ft 2 in (20.48 m)
Draft24 ft 3 in – 24 ft 5 in (7.4–7.43 m)
Installed power
Propulsion
Speed21 knots (39 km/h; 24 mph)
Range10,000 nmi (19,000 km; 12,000 mi) at 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph)
Complement676
Armament
Armor

The Asama-class cruisers (浅間型装甲巡洋艦, Asama-gata sōkōjun'yōkan) were a pair of

Battle of Tsingtao
(1914) and also searched for commerce raiders. Both ships made training cruises during the war and continued to do so after 1918.

Asama continued to make training cruises until she ran aground again in 1935, after which she became a stationary

minefields during 1944–45 until she was twice damaged by mines in 1945. Shortly before the end of the war, American aircraft inflicted heavy damage on the ship and her crew had to beach her. Tokiwa was salvaged in 1947 and subsequently broken up
for scrap. Asama survived the war intact and was scrapped in 1946–47.

Background and design

The 1896 Naval Expansion Plan was made after the First Sino-Japanese War of 1894–95 and included four armored cruisers in addition to four more battleships, all of which had to be ordered from foreign shipyards as Japan lacked the capability to build them itself. Further consideration of the Russian building program caused the IJN to believe that the battleships ordered under the original plan would not be sufficient to counter the Imperial Russian Navy. Budgetary limitations prevented ordering more battleships and the IJN decided to expand the number of more affordable armored cruisers to be ordered from four to six ships. The revised plan is commonly known as the "Six-Six Fleet".[1] These ships were purchased using the £30,000,000 indemnity paid by China after losing the First Sino-Japanese War.[2] Unlike most of their contemporaries which were designed for commerce raiding or to defend colonies and trade routes, these cruisers was intended as fleet scouts and to be employed in the battleline.[3]

In June 1896, Sir Andrew Noble, then in Japan, telegraphed Armstrong Whitworth to lay down two stock cruisers. Work then began on a preliminary design based on an improved version of the earlier Chilean cruiser O'Higgins. Several iterations of the design were made before the IJN approved the final design on 21 August. This was over 1,000 long tons (1,016 t) larger, more heavily armed, and slightly faster the Chilean armored cruiser.[4] The first ship of the class was laid down in October although the Japanese did not order the ships until 6 July 1897.[5]

Description

Brassey's Naval Annual
1902

The ships were 442 feet 0 inches (134.72 m) long

deep load. The ships had metacentric heights of 2 feet 9 inches – 2 feet 11 inches (0.85–0.88 m).[6] Their crew consisted of 676 officers and enlisted men.[7]

The Asama-class ships had two 4-cylinder

kW). The ships had a designed speed of 22 knots (41 km/h; 25 mph) and exceeded that speed during their sea trials, reaching 22.07–23.1 knots (40.87–42.78 km/h; 25.40–26.58 mph) from 19,000–19,040 ihp (14,170–14,200 kW). They carried up to 1,390 long tons (1,410 t) of coal[9] and could steam for 10,000 nautical miles (19,000 km; 12,000 mi) at a speed of 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph).[7]

Armament

Cross-section of the eight-inch gun turret used by all the "Six-Six Fleet" armored cruisers

The

armor-piercing (AP) projectiles at a muzzle velocity of 2,500 feet per second (760 m/s) to a range of 13,200 yards (12,100 m).[11]

The

QF 12-pounder 12-cwt guns[Note 1] and eight QF 2.5-pounder Yamauchi guns as close-range defense against torpedo boats.[11] The former gun fired three-inch (76 mm), 12.5-pound (5.7 kg) projectiles at a muzzle velocity of 2,359 feet per second (719 m/s).[13]

The Asama-class ships were equipped with five submerged 18-inch (457 mm)

bow. The Type 30 torpedo had a 100-kilogram (220 lb) warhead and three range/speed settings: 870 yards (800 m) at 27 knots (50 km/h; 31 mph), 1,100 yards (1,000 m) at 23.6 knots (43.7 km/h; 27.2 mph) or 3,300 yards (3,000 m) at 14.2 knots (26.3 km/h; 16.3 mph).[14]

Protection

All of the "Six-Six Fleet" armored cruisers used the same armor scheme with some minor differences, with the Asama class using Harvey armor. The waterline belt ran the full length of the ships and its thickness varied from 7.0 inches (178 mm) amidships to 3.5 inches (89 mm) at the bow and stern. The thickest part of the belt covered the middle of the ship for a length of 284 feet 2 inches (86.62 m). It had a height of 7 feet 0 inches (2.13 m), of which 4 feet 11 inches to 5 feet 0 inches (1.51 to 1.52 m) was normally underwater. The upper strake of belt armor was 5.0 inches (127 mm) thick and extended from the upper edge of the waterline belt to the main deck. It extended 214 feet 8 inches (65.42 m) from the forward to the rear barbette. The Asama-class ships had a single transverse 5-inch armored bulkhead that closed off the forward end of the central armored citadel.[15]

The barbettes, gun turrets and the front of the casemates were all 6 inches thick while the sides and rear of the casemates were protected by 51 millimeters (2.0 in) of armor.

double bottom and an additional 131 between the bottom and the upper deck.[14]

Ships

Construction data
Ship Builder[9]
Laid down[9]
Launched[16] Completed[5]
Asama
Elswick
20 October 1896 22 March 1898 8 February 1899
Tokiwa 6 January 1897 6 July 1898 18 April 1899

Service

A colorized photo of Asama at anchor, Plymouth, 1902

Before the start of the Russo-Japanese War in 1904, Tokiwa supported Japanese forces during the

King Edward VII in 1902.[9]

Russo-Japanese War

At the beginning of the Russo-Japanese War the sisters were assigned to the 2nd Division of the

Port Arthur. Tōgō had expected the earlier surprise night attack by his destroyers to be much more successful than it was, anticipating that the Russians would be badly disorganized and weakened, but they had recovered from their surprise and were ready for his attack.[21]

In early March Tokiwa was reassigned to the 3rd Division and Asama joined her shortly afterwards.[22] They participated in the action of 13 April when Tōgō successfully lured out two battleships of the Russian Pacific Squadron. During this action, the sisters engaged the Russian cruisers that preceded the battleships before falling back on Tōgō's battleships.[23] When the Russians spotted the five battleships of the 1st Division, they turned back for Port Arthur and the battleship Petropavlovsk struck a minefield laid by the Japanese the previous night. The ship sank in less than two minutes after one of her magazines exploded.[24]

A postcard of Tokiwa at sea, c. 1904

Tokiwa rejoined the 2nd Division a few days later and the division was tasked to contain the Russian armored cruisers based at Vladivostok. It failed to do so until 13 August[25] when the latter tried to rendezvous with the ships that attempted to breakout from Port Arthur. Unbeknownst to the Russians, Tōgō had defeated the ships from Port Arthur during the Battle of the Yellow Sea on 10 August and the Russian squadron from Vladivostok was intercepted off Ulsan, Korea by the 2nd Division. The steering of the Russian cruiser Rurik was damaged early in the battle and the Russians made several attempts to prevent the Japanese from concentrating fire on her, but were ultimately forced to abandon her to her fate. Kamimura left Rurik to the tender ministrations of his reinforcements and pursued the two remaining Russian ships for a time before breaking off pursuit prematurely based on an incorrect report that his flagship had expended most of her ammunition. Tokiwa only suffered three men wounded during the battle.[26]

In the meantime, Asama remained on blockade duty off Port Arthur and participated in a minor way in the Battle of the Yellow Sea. She was coaling when the Pacific Squadron sortied and took some time to intercept the Russian ships. The battle was almost over by then and the ship only engaged them for the last hour or so of the battle.[27] After the battle, the sisters were refitted and assigned to different units, escorting troop convoys to northern Korea and blockading the Tsugaru Strait until the Russian ships from the Baltic Fleet approached Japan in mid-1905.[28]

Battle of Tsushima

A Japanese postcard of Asama at anchor, after 1904

The Russian 2nd and 3rd Pacific Squadrons were spotted on the morning on 27 May 1905 and Tōgō ordered his ships to put to sea. Asama and Tokiwa were assigned to the 2nd Division in anticipation of this battle and Kamimura's ships confirmed the initial spotting later that morning before joining Tōgō's battleships. Together with most of the Japanese battleships, the division opened fire at 14:10 on the Russian battleship Oslyabya. Shortly afterwards, Asama was damaged by a shell that knocked out her steering that forced her to fall out of formation. Around 15:35, the Russian battleship Knyaz Suvorov suddenly appeared out of the mist at short range. Kamimura's ships engaged her for five minutes before she disappeared back into the mists. Asama rejoined the division at 15:50, but further hits caused serious flooding that again caused her to fall out of formation about 20 minutes later. She finally caught up to the division at 17:05. Shortly afterwards, Kamimura led his division in a fruitless pursuit of some of the Russian cruisers around 17:30. He abandoned his chase around 18:03 and encountered the Russian battleline about a half-hour later. He stayed at long range and his ships fired when practicable before ceasing fire at 19:30.[29]

The surviving Russian ships were spotted the next morning and the Japanese ships opened fire and stayed beyond the range at which the Russian ships could effectively reply. Rear Admiral

amphibious landings in northeastern Korea in July and August before the war ended.[34]

Subsequent service

In 1910–11 and 1914, Asama served as a training ship, making cruises with naval cadets to North and Central American and Hawaii, among other destinations. After the start of World War I in August 1914, she was assigned to search for Vice Admiral

South Sea Islands. In late October, the ship was ordered to blockade a German gunboat in Honolulu, Hawaii before she was assigned to the American Expeditionary Squadron, the Japanese component of a joint Anglo-Japanese command to protect shipping of the western coast of the Americas, off the Mexican coast after the gunboat was interned in early November. The squadron then spent the next several months for German commerce raiders.[35]

While entering Puerto San Bartolomé in Baja California in early 1915, Asama struck an uncharted rock and was badly damaged. It took months to refloat her and to make her partially seaworthy. The ship was given temporary repairs at the British naval base at Esquimalt, British Columbia, before arriving back in Japan in December[35] where permanent repairs were not completed until March 1917.[32] Asama was assigned to the Training Squadron later that year and made another cadet training cruise in 1918.[36]

Tokiwa supported Japanese forces during the

anti-aircraft (AA) guns were added.[7] The gun had a maximum elevation of +75 degrees, and could fire a 3-inch, 12.5 lb (5.67 kg) projectile with a muzzle velocity of 2,200 ft/s (680 m/s) to a maximum height of 23,600 feet (7,200 m).[39]

Asama being towed to sea off Australia, between 1923 and 1935

Asama made a training cruise in 1921[36] before her armament was modified in 1922. All of her main deck guns, six 6-inch and four 12-pounder guns, were removed and their casemates plated over. In addition all of her QF 2.5-pounder guns were removed and a single 8 cm/40 3rd Year Type AA gun was added.[40] After the refit, she resumed her training cruises, generally at two-year intervals, until she ran aground in 1935. The damage to her bottom was severe enough that the IJN decided make her a stationary training ship in 1938.[41]

Tokiwa's

25-millimeter Type 96 light AA guns in twin-gun mounts.[43] The 25 mm (0.98 in) weapon was the standard Japanese light anti-aircraft gun during World War II, but it suffered from severe design shortcomings that rendered it a largely ineffective weapon. The twin and triple mounts lacked sufficient speed in train or elevation; the gun sights were unable to handle fast targets; the gun exhibited excessive vibration; the magazine was too small and, finally, the gun produced excessive muzzle blast. The weapon had a maximum range of 24,600 feet (7,500 m), but effective range was only about 4,900–9,800 feet (1,500–3,000 m).[44]

The Pacific War

Asama on 25 August 1946

The ship returned home in 1943 and began to lay defensive minefields in 1944. She was moderately damaged by a mine in April 1945 and struck an American mine two months later. By this time, her armament had been augmented with approximately ten 25 mm Type 96 AA guns in single mounts and 80

Type 3, Mark 1, Model 3 and Type 2, Mark 2, Model 1 air search radars.[46] While in northern Japan a few days before the end of the war, Tokiwa was severely damaged by American carrier aircraft and had to be beached by her crew lest she sink.[42]

Asama was reclassified as a training ship in 1942 and became a gunnery training ship later that year. She was disarmed at some point during the war, only retaining several 8 cm/40 3rd Year Type anti-aircraft guns.[47] The ship survived the war intact and she and Tokiwa were stricken from the navy list in November 1945. Asama was scrapped in 1946–47 while Tokiwa was refloated in 1947 and scrapped that same year.[42][48]

Notes

  1. ^ "Cwt" is the abbreviation for hundredweight, 12 cwt referring to the weight of the gun.

Footnotes

  1. ^ Evans & Peattie, pp. 57–62
  2. ^ Brook 1999, p. 125
  3. ^ Milanovich, p. 72
  4. ^ Brook 1999, pp. 107–09
  5. ^ a b Milanovich, p. 73
  6. ^ Milanovich, pp. 74, 80
  7. ^ a b c d Jentschura, Jung & Mickel, p. 72
  8. ^ Milanovich, p. 81
  9. ^ a b c d e f Brook 1999, p. 109
  10. ^ Milanovich, pp. 76–77
  11. ^ a b Milanovich, p. 78
  12. ^ Friedman, p. 276; Milanovich, p. 78
  13. ^ Friedman, p. 114
  14. ^ a b Milanovich, p. 80
  15. ^ Milanovich, pp. 80–81
  16. ^ a b c Chesneau & Kolesnik, p. 225
  17. ^ Brook 1999, p. 107
  18. ^ Dix, p. 307
  19. ^ Kowner, p. 465
  20. ^ Warner & Warner, pp. 188–95
  21. ^ Forczyk, pp. 42–43
  22. ^ Corbett, I, pp. 127, 142
  23. ^ Warner & Warner, pp. 236–38
  24. ^ Forczyk, pp. 45–46
  25. ^ Corbett, I, pp. 188–89, 191–96, 283–89, 319–25, 337–51
  26. ^ Brook 2000, pp. 43, 45
  27. ^ Corbett, I, pp. 389, 397–98, 417
  28. ^ Corbett 1994, II, pp. 47, 52, 97, 104, 153, 159–60, 176–77, 217
  29. ^ Campbell 1978, Part 2, pp. 128–32; Part 3, pp. 186–87
  30. ^ Corbett 1994, II, pp. 319–20
  31. ^ a b Campbell 1978, Part 4, p. 263
  32. ^ a b Brook, p. 110
  33. ^ Watts & Gordon, p. 109
  34. ^ Corbett, II, pp. 356, 363–65, 377–80
  35. ^ a b Estes
  36. ^ a b Lacroix & Wells, p. 657
  37. ^ Burdick, pp. 235, 241
  38. ^ Saxon
  39. ^ Campbell 1985, pp. 197–98
  40. ^ Jentschura, Jung & Mickel, p. 73
  41. ^ Lacroix & Wells, pp. 657–59
  42. ^ a b c d Hacket & Kingsepp
  43. ^ Chesneau, p. 207
  44. ^ Campbell 1985, p. 200
  45. ^ Rohwer, p. 123
  46. ^ Fukui, p. 13
  47. ^ Fukui, p. 53
  48. ^ Lacroix & Wells, p. 659

References

External links