Ise-class battleship
Ise at speed, shortly after completion
| |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Name | Ise class |
Builders | |
Operators | Imperial Japanese Navy |
Preceded by | Fusō class |
Succeeded by | Nagato class |
Built | 1915–1918 |
In service | 1917–1945 |
Completed | 2 |
Lost | 2 |
Scrapped | 2 |
General characteristics (as built) | |
Type | Dreadnought battleship |
Displacement | 31,260 long tons (31,762 t) (normal) |
Length | 208.18 m (683 ft) |
Beam | 28.65 m (94 ft) |
Draught | 8.93 m (29 ft 4 in) |
Installed power |
|
Propulsion | 4 × shafts; 2 × steam turbine sets |
Speed | 23 knots (43 km/h; 26 mph) |
Range | 9,680 nmi (17,930 km; 11,140 mi) at 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph) |
Complement | 1,360 |
Armament |
|
Armour |
|
General characteristics (after first reconstruction) | |
Displacement | 42,001 long tons (42,675 t) (deep load) |
Length | 216 m (708 ft 8 in) |
Beam | 31.75 m (104 ft 2 in) |
Draught | 9.45 m (31 ft) |
Installed power |
|
Propulsion | 4 × steam turbines |
Speed | 25 knots (46 km/h; 29 mph) |
Range | 7,870 nmi (14,580 km; 9,060 mi) at 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph) |
Complement | 1,376 |
Armament |
|
Armour | Decks: 51–152 mm (2–6 in) |
Aircraft carried | 3 |
Aviation facilities | 1 catapult |
General characteristics (as hybrid carriers, 1945) | |
Displacement | 42,675 long tons (43,360 t) (deep load) |
Length | 219.62 m (720 ft 6 in) |
Beam | 31.71 m (104 ft) |
Draught | 9.03 m (29 ft 8 in) |
Range | 9,500 nmi (17,600 km; 10,900 mi) at 16 knots |
Complement | 1,463 |
Sensors and processing systems |
|
Armament |
|
Aircraft carried | 22 |
Aviation facilities | 2 catapults |
The Ise-class battleships (伊勢型戦艦, Ise-gata senkan) were a pair of
Despite the expensive reconstructions, both vessels were considered obsolete by the eve of the
Background
The design of the Ise-class battleships was shaped both by the ongoing international naval arms race and a desire among Japanese naval planners to maintain a fleet of capital ships powerful enough to defeat the United States Navy in an encounter in Japanese territorial waters.[1] The IJN's fleet of battleships had proven highly successful in 1905, the last year of the Russo-Japanese War, which culminated in the destruction of the Russian Second and Third Pacific Squadrons at the Battle of Tsushima.[2]
In the aftermath, the Japanese Empire immediately turned its focus to the two remaining rivals for imperial dominance in the Pacific Ocean: Britain and the United States.
The launch of HMS Dreadnought in 1906 by the Royal Navy raised the stakes,[6] and complicated Japan's plans. Displacing 17,900 long tons (18,187 t) and armed with ten 12-inch (30.5 cm) guns, Dreadnought rendered all existing battleships obsolete by comparison.[7] The launch of the battlecruiser HMS Invincible the following year was a further setback for Japan's quest for parity.[8] When the two new Satsuma-class battleships and two Tsukuba-class armoured cruisers, launched by 1911, were outclassed by their British counterparts, the Eight-Eight Fleet Program was restarted.[9]
The first battleships built for the renewed Eight-Eight Fleet Program were the two dreadnoughts of the Kawachi class, ordered in 1907 and laid down in 1908. In 1910, the Navy put forward a request to the Diet (parliament) to secure funding for the entirety of the program at once. Because of economic constraints, only four battlecruisers and a single battleship of the Fusō class were ultimately approved by the Diet. Three more Fusō-class ships (Yamashiro, Ise, and Hyūga) were approved[10] and all three were ordered in April 1913. While Yamashiro was laid down later that year, the IJN lacked the funding to proceed with the construction of Ise and Hyūga until the Diet authorized additional funding for the ships in July 1914.[11]
Design and description
The progress of Fusō's construction, while the IJN waited for the funding to be released and foreign developments, caused the IJN to reassess the Fusō-class design. The distribution of the midships gun turrets was the most obvious flaw as they complicated the protection of the midships
The ships had a length of 208.18 metres (683 ft)
During the ships' modernization during the 1930s, their forward superstructures were enlarged with multiple platforms added to their tripod
Propulsion
The Ise-class ships had two sets of direct-drive
During their 1930s modernization, the boilers on each ship were replaced by eight new Kampon oil-fired boilers, fitted into the former aft boiler room, and the forward funnel was removed.[18] The turbines were replaced by four geared Kampon turbines with a designed output of 80,000 shp (60,000 kW) intended to increase their speed to 24.5 knots (45.4 km/h; 28.2 mph). On her trials, Ise reached a top speed of 25.26 knots (46.78 km/h; 29.07 mph) from 81,050 shp (60,440 kW).[13] The fuel storage of the ships was increased to a total of 5,113 long tons (5,195 t) of fuel oil that gave them a range of 7,870 nautical miles (14,580 km; 9,060 mi) at a speed of 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph).[18]
Armament
The twelve 45-
By World War II, the guns used Type 91
The ships'
In 1931–1933 the AA guns were replaced with eight 40-calibre
During the mid-1930s reconstruction, the torpedo tubes were removed and the Vickers two-pounders were replaced by twenty license-built
Protection
The Ise-class ships'
The Ise class were the only Japanese battleships to place the powder magazine above the shell magazine as the IJN wished to put as much space as possible between the highly flammable
Fire control and sensors
While the details of the ships' fire-control instruments are not fully available, it is known that the ships were fitted with a
Aircraft
Ise was briefly fitted with an aircraft flying-off platform for a Mitsubishi 1MF3 fighter on Turret No. 2 in 1927. It was replaced by a platform on Turret No. 5 for a Yokosuka E1Y reconnaissance floatplane in 1928–1929.[43] A catapult and a collapsible 4-tonne (3.9-long-ton) crane were fitted on the stern during the mid-1930s modernization, and the ships were equipped to operate three floatplanes, although no hangar was provided. The initial Nakajima E4N2 biplanes were replaced by Nakajima E8N2 biplanes in 1938.[32]
Conversion to hybrid carriers
The sinking of the British capital ships Prince of Wales and Repulse by Japanese land-based aircraft on 10 December 1941 led the IJN to realize that battleships could not operate in the face of enemy aircraft and required friendly air support to protect them. The loss of four Japanese aircraft carriers during the Battle of Midway in June 1942 severely limited the ability of the IJN to provide any air cover and alternatives were sought. Earlier proposals to convert one or more battleships into carriers had been made and rejected at the beginning of the war, but they were revived after Midway. Plans for more elaborate conversions were rejected on the grounds of expense and - more critically - time, and the IJN settled on removing the rear pair of turrets and replacing them with a flight deck equipped with two catapults to launch floatplanes. The Ise-class ships were selected for the conversion because Hyūga had suffered an explosion in Turret No. 5 in early May that virtually destroyed the turret and Turret No. 6 could not elevate to the full +43 degrees deemed necessary for the long-range engagement anticipated by the IJN. The Fusōs were scheduled to follow once the first two were completed.[44]
Armament changes
The rear turrets, the barbettes and their supporting structures were removed beginning in early 1943 and the openings in the middle deck were covered by 152 mm plates salvaged from the turret armour. All of the 14 cm guns were removed and the casemate openings sealed off. Four additional twin 12.7 cm mounts were added, one pair abreast the funnel and the other abreast the conning tower. The original ten twin 25 mm gun mounts were replaced by triple mounts and nine new triple mounts were added, a total of 57 guns. Two each Type 94 and Type 95 AA directors were added to control the additional guns. The ammunition for these new guns was stored in the magazines originally used for the 14 cm guns and for Turret No. 5.
Flight deck arrangements
A 70-metre-long (229 ft 8 in) flight deck was built above the stern and stretched forward to the rebuilt aft superstructure. The flight deck was 29 metres (95 ft 2 in) wide at its forward end and 13 metres (42 ft 8 in) at the stern. It overhung the stern and increased the overall length of the ships to 219.62 metres (720 ft 6 in). A pair of rotating gunpowder-propelled catapults were fitted on the sides of the hull, forward of the aft superstructure where they partially restricted the arc of fire of the two amidships turrets. They could launch aircraft up to 4,600 kilograms (10,100 lb) in weight and required 30 seconds to launch each aircraft. The flight deck had eight permanent storage positions connected by rails to the catapults and the hydraulically operated aircraft lift that brought the aircraft up from the hangar below on the trolleys used to move the floatplanes about. Two aircraft were intended to be stowed on the catapults and three more in temporary positions on the flight deck for a total of thirteen.[46]
The 40-metre-long (131 ft 3 in) hangar was 20 metres (65 ft 7 in) wide forward and 11 metres (36 ft 1 in) at the rear. It was 6 metres (19 ft 8 in) high and designed to stow nine aircraft. It was fitted with
The ships had an air group of 11 each of Yokosuka D4Y dive bombers (Allied reporting name "Judy") and Aichi E16A reconnaissance aircraft (Allied reporting name "Paul"). Both aircraft had development problems and neither air group ever had all of its intended aircraft. Coupled with a shortage of trained pilots, neither ship ever used its aircraft during combat.[48]
Other changes
After the loss of the
The removal of the secondary armament, the rear turrets and their supporting structures was generally compensated by the addition of the flight deck, hangar, AA guns and more fuel, and the metacentric height increased 0.23 metres (9.1 in) to 2.81 metres (9 ft 3 in) at full load as a result of the reduction in the displacement by over 2,000 tonnes (2,000 long tons) to 40,444 tonnes (39,805 long tons). This also reduced the draught to 9.03 metres (29 ft 8 in). The overhang of the flight deck at the stern increased the overall length to 219.62 metres (720 ft 6 in) and the beam was slightly reduced to 31.71 metres (104 ft 0 in).[49]
Ships
Ship | Kanji | Builder [50] | Laid down[50]
|
Launched[50] | Completed [50] | Fate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ise | 伊勢 | Kawasaki, Kobe | 10 May 1915 | 2 November 1916 | 15 December 1917 | Scrapped in place, 9 October 1946 – 4 July 1947[43] |
Hyūga | 日向 | Mitsubishi, Nagasaki | 6 May 1915 | 27 January 1917 | 30 April 1918 | Scrapped, 2 July 1946 – 4 July 1947[51] |
Service
Upon commissioning, the
World War II
When Japan began the Pacific War on 8 December,
During gunnery training on 5 May, there was a premature detonation in the left gun of Hyūga's Turret No. 5 that disabled both guns and killed 51 crewmen. Both aft magazines were flooded to douse the resulting fire and save the ship. She received temporary repairs during which the turret was removed and replaced by a circular armour plate on which three triple 25 mm gun mounts were positioned. On 11 May a valve in Ise's No. 2 engine room stuck in the open position and flooded the engine room. While under repair at Kure, both ships received prototype Type 21 radars.
They returned home on 14 June and the IJN began preliminary planning to replace the lost carriers with hybrid carriers converted from battleships. The sisters were selected for conversion and detached from the division on 14 July in preparation. They remained on "standby alert" until the actual conversions began.[32] Ise was converted at Kure Naval Arsenal from 23 February to 5 September 1943 and Hyūga at Sasebo Naval Arsenal from 2 May to 30 November.[55]
After completing her sea trials, Ise was attached to the
Battle off Cape Engaño
In October 1944, the two ships were involved in the
Although they had lost contact during the night, the Americans did find the Japanese carriers at 07:35. They had already launched an airstrike of 180 aircraft that was orbiting 50 miles (80 km) ahead of the American carriers while waiting for the Japanese ships to be located.
Ise was attacked by 80-odd aircraft from the fourth wave, but they failed to inflict any serious damage. She dodged 11 torpedoes and was only hit by a bomb once, on the bulge outboard of the port catapult. Some 34 other bombs near missed her, spraying her with splinters and ruptured some hull plates that contaminated some fuel oil and caused leaks in her port boiler rooms. While an exact total of her casualties is not available, it has been estimated that 5 men were killed and some 111–121 crewmen were wounded during this attack.[43] Hyūga was unsuccessfully attacked by an American submarine at 18:43. Around 19:00 Ozawa learned about a force of destroyers and cruisers that drove off the Japanese destroyers rescuing survivors from some of the carriers lost earlier in the day and sank Chiyoda. He ordered the Fourth Carrier Division to reverse course and engage the Americans, but the battleships were unable to find them, and Ozawa ordered them to reverse course and head for Amami Ōshima. When they arrived on 27 October, Ozawa transferred to Hyūga and hoisted his flag aboard her. While en route for Kure, the division was unsuccessfully attacked by another submarine.[32]
Late war
In early November the catapults were removed from both ships, and they loaded troops and munitions later that month. While en route they were diverted to the Spratly Islands upon reports of heavy air raids at Manila. After off-loading their cargo, they sailed for Lingga Island, near Singapore, on 20 November. They transferred to Cam Ranh Bay, French Indochina, and Hyūga became flagship of the 5th Fleet there on 14 December. The division sailed for Singapore on 30 December and Vice Admiral Kiyohide Shima transferred his flag to the light cruiser Ōyodo on arrival there the following day. The division continued onwards to Lingga. Its planned return to Japan was delayed by attacks by the American Third Fleet on targets in Indochina and southern China that sank two oil tankers that were intended to refuel the division.[32]
The IJN then decided to use the sisters and their escorts to bring a load of petrol, rubber, tin and other strategic minerals back to Japan after the American carriers departed the
The ships were turned into
Notes
- QF 12-pounder guns. While the Japanese designated them as 8 cm, their actual calibre was 76.2 mm.[26]
- ^ Sources contradict each other regarding the armour scheme of these ships. Lengerer, the most recent researcher using Japanese sources, has been followed rather than older sources.
- Hawaiian Standard Time, so in Japan, the attack on Pearl Harborhappened on 8 December.
Footnotes
- ^ a b Stille, p. 4
- ^ Evans & Peattie, p. 124
- ^ a b Evans & Peattie, p. 143
- ^ Evans & Peattie, p. 150
- ^ Stille, p. 7
- ^ Evans & Peattie, p. 152
- ^ Sandler, p. 90
- ^ Evans & Peattie, p. 154
- ^ Evans & Peattie, p. 159
- ^ Evans & Peattie, pp. 159, 166
- ^ Lengerer 2011, pp. 13, 19
- ^ Lengerer 2011, pp. 16–17, 19–20, 33–34
- ^ a b Lengerer March 2007, p. 9
- ^ Jentschura, Jung & Mickel, pp. 25–26
- ^ Lengerer 2011, p. 40
- ^ Chesneau, p. 171
- ^ Lengerer 2009, p. 51
- ^ a b c d Jentschura, Jung & Mickel, p. 26
- ^ Lengerer 2011, pp. 21–22
- ^ Lengerer March 2007, p. 8
- ^ Lengerer 2011, pp. 24–26, 30
- ^ Lengerer March 2007, pp. 15–17
- ^ Campbell, pp. 175, 183
- ^ Lengerer 2011, pp. 33–34
- ^ Campbell, p. 190
- ^ a b Campbell, p. 198
- ^ Gardiner & Gray, p. 230
- ^ Lengerer 2011, p. 35
- ^ Campbell, p. 204
- ^ Lengerer March 2007, p. 12
- ^ Campbell, pp. 192–93
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Hackett, Kingsepp & Ahlberg, Ise and Hackett & Kingsepp, Hyūga
- ^ Campbell, p. 74
- ^ Stille, p. 11
- ^ Campbell, p. 200
- ^ Lengerer 2006, pp. 28–30; Lengerer 2011, p. 36
- ^ Lengerer March 2007, p. 16
- ^ Lengerer 2006, pp. 28–30
- ^ Lengerer 2011, pp. 36, 38
- ^ Whitley, pp. 194–95
- ^ Lengerer March 2007, p. 17
- ^ Lengerer 2011, pp. 28, 30–31, 41
- ^ a b c Hackett, Kingsepp & Ahlberg
- ^ Lengerer 2009, pp. 39–40
- ^ Lengerer 2009, p. 43
- ^ Lengerer 2009, pp. 43–44, 50
- ^ Lengerer 2009, pp. 45–49
- ^ Lengerer 2009, pp. 51–53
- ^ a b Lengerer 2009, pp. 43, 49–51
- ^ a b c d Whitley, p. 193
- ^ Hackett & Kingsepp
- ^ Whitley, pp. 197, 199
- ^ Rohwer, pp. 168–69
- ^ Parshall & Tully, pp. 46, 454
- ^ Lengerer 2009, p. 42
- ^ Lengerer 2009, pp. 51–52
- ^ Lengerer 2009, p. 52
- ^ Polmar & Genda, p. 415
- ^ Morison 1958, pp. 191, 193.
- ^ Polmar & Genda, pp. 427–428
- ^ Polmar & Genda, pp. 428–429
- ^ Jentschura, Jung & Mickel, p. 57
- ^ Blair, pp. 846–49
References
- ISBN 978-1-55750-217-9.
- Campbell, John (1985). Naval Weapons of World War II. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-459-4.
- Chesneau, Roger, ed. (1980). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1922–1946. Greenwich, UK: Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 0-85177-146-7.
- Evans, David & ISBN 0-87021-192-7.
- Gardiner, Robert & Gray, Randal, eds. (1985). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-907-3.
- Hackett, Bob & Kingsepp, Sander (2011). "IJN Hyuga: Tabular Record of Movement". Combinedfleet.com. Retrieved 15 June 2013.
- Hackett, Bob; Kingsepp, Sander & Ahlberg, Lars (2012). "IJN Ise: Tabular Record of Movement". Combinedfleet.com. Retrieved 15 May 2013.
- Jentschura, Hansgeorg; Jung, Dieter & Mickel, Peter (1977). Warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1869-1945. Annapolis, Maryland: ISBN 0-87021-893-X.
- Layman, R. D. & McLaughlin, Stephen (1991). The Hybrid Warship: The Amalgamation of Big Guns and Aircraft. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-374-5.
- Lengerer, Hans (September 2006). Ahlberg, Lars (ed.). "Battleships Ise and Hyûga – Part I". Contributions to the History of Imperial Japanese Warships (Paper I): 4–30.(subscription required)(contact the editor at [email protected] for subscription information)
- Lengerer, Hans (March 2007). Ahlberg, Lars (ed.). "Battleships Ise and Hyûga – Part II". Contributions to the History of Imperial Japanese Warships (Paper II): 4–17.(subscription required)
- Lengerer, Hans (2009). "Ise and Hyûga: The IJN's Hybrid Battleship-Carriers". In Jordan, John (ed.). Warship 2009. London: Conway. pp. 39–54. ISBN 978-1-84486-089-0.
- Lengerer, Hans (March 2011). Ahlberg, Lars (ed.). "The Japanese 14"-Gunned Battleships: An Abstract of the Fusō and Ise Classes – Part I". Contributions to the History of Imperial Japanese Warships (Paper X): 5–42.(subscription required)
- Morison, Samuel Eliot (1958). Leyte: June 1944 – January 1945. OL 24388559M.
- Polmar, Norman & ISBN 1-57488-663-0.
- Rohwer, Jurgen (2005). Chronology of the War at Sea, 1939–1945: The Naval History of World War Two. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-119-2.
- Sandler, Stanley (2004). Battleships: An Illustrated History of their Impact. Weapons and Warfare. Santa Barbara, California: ABC Clio. ISBN 1-85109-410-5.
- Stille, Mark (2008). Imperial Japanese Navy Battleships 1941–45. New Vanguard. Vol. 146. Botley, Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84603-280-6.
- Whitley, M. J. (1998). Battleships of World War II. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-184-X.