London, Brighton and South Coast Railway

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

London, Brighton and South Coast Railway
1920 map of the railway
The LB&SCR armorial device[note 1]
Technical
Track gauge4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm)
Length457 miles 20 chains (735.9 km) (1919)[1]
Track length1,264 miles 32 chains (2,034.9 km) (1919)[1]

The London, Brighton and South Coast Railway (LB&SCR (known also as the Brighton line, the Brighton Railway or the Brighton)) was a railway company in the United Kingdom from 1846 to 1922. Its territory formed a rough triangle, with London at its apex, practically the whole coastline of

Tunbridge Wells, Dorking and Guildford. At the London end was a complicated suburban and outer-suburban network of lines emanating from London Bridge and Victoria
, and shared interests in two cross-London lines.

The LB&SCR was formed by a merger of five companies in 1846, and merged with the L&SWR, the SE&CR and several minor railway companies in southern England under the

Southern Railway
from 1 January 1923.

A map of the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway at London Victoria station

Origins of the company

The London, Brighton and South Coast Railway (LB&SCR) was formed by

Act of Parliament
on 27 July 1846, through the amalgamation of a number of railway companies:

Only the first two were independent operating railways: the Brighton and Chichester and the Brighton, Lewes and Hastings had been purchased by the L&BR in 1845,[2] and the Croydon and Epsom was largely owned by the L&CR.)

The amalgamation was brought about, against the wishes of the boards of directors of the companies, by shareholders in the L&CR and L&BR who were dissatisfied with the early returns from their investments.[3]

The LB&SCR existed for 76 years until 31 December 1922, when it was wound up as a result of the

Southern Railway
.

Original routes

(Dates of opening from F. Burtt The Locomotives of the London Brighton and South Coast Railway 1839–1903.[4])

At the time of its creation the LB&SCR had around 170 route miles (274 km) in existence or under construction, consisting of three main routes and a number of branches.

The

Arun Valley Line from Three Bridges to Horsham
(opened 14 February 1848).

The

West Sussex coast line originated with a branch line from Brighton to Shoreham, opened 12 May 1840. This had been extended to Chichester by the time of the amalgamation, and a further extension to Havant
was under construction (opened 15 March 1847), with the ultimate aim of extending the line to Portsmouth.

The

Newhaven (opened 8 December 1847), Eastbourne and Hailsham (opened 14 May 1849). A connecting spur from the Brighton main line at Keymer Junction near Haywards Heath
to the Brighton–Lewes line was under construction at the time of amalgamation, opening in October 1847.

A 1908 Railway Clearing House map of lines around Bricklayers Arms and London Bridge station, as well as surrounding lines. LB&SCR lines are shown in green.

A short line from New Cross to Deptford Wharf, proposed by the L&CR, was approved in July 1846, shortly before amalgamation, but was not opened until 2 July 1849. The use of this line for passengers would have contravened the recently negotiated agreement with the SER that the LB&SCR would not operate lines to the east of its main line, and it was restricted to goods.[5] A short branch from this line to the nearby Surrey Commercial Docks in Rotherhithe opened in July 1855.[6]

London stations

The main London terminus was the L&CR station at

London Bridge, built by the London and Greenwich Railway (L&GR) in 1836, and exchanged for the original L&CR station in 1842. For the first few years of its existence, LB&SCR trains used the L&GR lines from Corbett's Lane into London, but by 1849 the viaducts had been widened sufficiently for its own tracks.[7]

The LB&SCR inherited from the L&CR running powers to the smaller SER passenger terminus at Bricklayers Arms. Poorly sited for passengers, it closed in 1852 and was converted into a goods station.

The LB&SCR owned three stations at Croydon, later East Croydon (former L&BR) Central Croydon and West Croydon (former L&CR).

Atmospheric lines

The L&CR had been partially operated by the atmospheric principle between Croydon and Forest Hill, as the first phase of a scheme to use this mode of operation between London and Epsom. However, following a number of technical problems, the LB&SCR abandoned atmospheric operation in May 1847. This enabled it to build its own lines into London Bridge, and have its own independent station there, by 1849.

The history of the LB&SCR can be studied in five distinct periods.

Relations with neighbouring railways, and the beginnings of expansion 1846–1859

The LB&SCR was formed at the same time as the bursting of the

London Bridge). In October 1849 the SER acquired the new Reading, Guildford and Reigate Railway (RG&RR) line, which the LB&SCR regarded as a major incursion into its territory. However, the LB&SCR had one important playing card not available to the L&BR—control of the SER main line between New Cross and Croydon. In 1849 the LB&SCR appointed a new and capable chairman, Samuel Laing, who negotiated a formal agreement with the SER that would resolve their difficulties for the time being and would define the territories of the two railways. Under this agreement the LB&SCR would have free access to London Bridge, Bricklayers Arms station and goods yard, and Hastings. The SER would have free use of the New Cross to Croydon line, and receive revenues from passengers at intermediate stations, but would not make or work competing lines to Brighton, Horsham, Chichester or Portsmouth.[8]

In 1847 the naval dockyard of

Admiralty objections.[9]
The LB&SCR began its services between Chichester and Portsmouth, on 14 June 1847, and the L&SWR from Fareham in October 1848.

In 1853 the Direct Portsmouth Railway gained parliamentary authority to build a line from Godalming to Havant with the intention of the company selling itself either to the L&SWR or the LB&SCR. This scheme would provide a far more direct route to Portsmouth but involved sharing the LB&SCR tracks for the five miles (8 km) between Havant and the joint line to Portsea.[10] The LB&SCR objected to the scheme but the L&SWR negotiated with the new company and in December 1858 sought to operate a train over the new route. The LB&SCR attempted to prevent the use of its tracks and the so-called 'battle of Havant' ensued. The matter was eventually resolved in the courts in August 1859, and relations between the railways were formalized in agreements of 1860 and 1862.[11]

Samuel Laing had also approved a modest degree of expansion elsewhere, most notably the acquisition of a

branch line from the main line at Three Bridges to the market town of East Grinstead in July 1855.[9]

Crystal Palace Branch

Some of the directors of the LB&SCR were closely involved with the company that purchased

The Great Exhibition in October 1851 and arranged for its removal to a site on Sydenham Hill, close to the London to Brighton main line, which they purchased from Leo Schuster. The Crystal Palace became a major tourist attraction and the LB&SCR built a branch line from Sydenham to the new site, which was opened in June 1854, and enlarged London Bridge station to handle the additional traffic. The attraction proved to be an enormous success with 10,000 passengers conveyed daily to and from the new branch.[12] On one day in 1859, 112,000 people were conveyed to Crystal Place by train, 70,000 of which from London Bridge.[13]

Rapid expansion 1856–1866

Samuel Laing retired as chairman at the end of 1855 to pursue a political career, and was replaced by the

merchant banker Leo Schuster, who had previously sold his 300-acre (120 ha) estate on Sydenham Hill to the new Crystal Palace Company.[14] Schuster instituted a policy of rapidly expanding the route mileage of the railway with new routes throughout south London, Sussex, and east Surrey. Some of these were financed and built by the LB&SCR, others by independent local companies set up with the intention of connecting a town to the railway network with the intention of sale or lease to the LB&SCR. Schuster accelerated the rate of mileage increase after appointing Frederick Banister as Chief Engineer in 1860. As a result, a further 177 miles (285 km) were constructed or authorised between 1857 and 1865.[15]

West End of London

A 1908 Railway Clearing House map of lines around the Brighton Main Line between South Croydon and Selhurst

Schuster also encouraged an independent concern, the West End of London and Crystal Palace Railway (WEL&CPR), to construct a new line extending in a wide arc round south London from the LB&SCR Crystal Palace branch to Wandsworth in 1856 and to Battersea in 1858 with a temporary terminus at Battersea Pier. Shortly after this line was completed, the LB&SCR leased it from the WEL&CPR and incorporated it into its system.

Between 1858 and 1860 the LB&SCR was a major shareholder in the

Victoria Station, thereby creating a through (albeit roundabout) route from its main line near Croydon to a terminus in the West End of London. Following the acquisition of the WEL&CPR, a new 'cut-off' line between Windmill Bridge Junction (Norwood) and Balham
was constructed during 1861 and 1862, which had the effect of reducing the distance from East Croydon to Victoria.

New lines in South London

The VS&PR line was also connected with another joint venture the

Addison Road
.

A 1912 Railway Clearing House map of lines around Clapham Junction and the approaches to Victoria

The

George Parker Bidder but in 1856 it was leased to the LB&SCR who purchased it in 1858.[16]

At the same time, the LB&SCR was cooperating with the LC&DR to create the

South London Line between its terminuses at London Bridge and Victoria. The LC&DR was used from Victoria to Brixton, followed by new construction by the LB&SCR through Denmark Hill, and Peckham to the main line to London Bridge at South Bermondsey.[17]

New lines in Sussex

During 1858, a

Tunbridge Wells. A large area in East Sussex between Tunbridge Wells and Eastbourne remained without railways, and the LB&SCR was anxious in case the SER should venture into this territory. As a result, in 1864 it sought powers to build a line between these two towns. It also obtained powers for the Ouse Valley Railway, from the south of Balcombe and north of Haywards Heath on the Brighton main line to Uckfield and Hailsham
; an extension to St Leonards was also approved in May 1865. However, some work had been carried out by the end of 1866, but not completed.

In West Sussex the

Hayling Railway, but it was leased to the LB&SCR in 1874.[19]

Following the 1862 agreement with the L&SWR, a line was built from near Pulborough to a junction with the

West Sussex coast line near Ford in 1863. This provided a shorter LB&SCR route from London to Portsmouth via Three Bridges and Horsham.[20]

New lines in Surrey

The

Epsom and Leatherhead Railway was an independent line from the L&SW main line at Wimbledon through Epsom and Leatherhead towards Guildford. The LB&SCR entered into an agreement to share its station at Epsom and to use the line as far as Leatherhead. The line opened in August 1859 and in 1860 this portion was transferred to the joint ownership of the LB&SCR and the L&SWR. The LB&SCR then bought the Banstead and Epsom Downs Railway, which was building a branch line from Sutton to Epsom Downs for Epsom Downs Racecourse
, opened in May 1865.

The LB&SCR wished to connect Horsham with significant towns in Surrey, and in 1865 it opened a line between West Horsham and the L&SWR near Guildford. It constructed a line from Leatherhead to Dorking in March 1867, continued to Horsham two months later. This enabled alternative LB&SCR routes from London to Brighton and the West Sussex coast and further reduced the distance of its route from London to Portsmouth.

The LB&SCR supported the independent Surrey and Sussex Junction Railway, which obtained powers in July 1865 to build a line from Croydon to Tunbridge Wells via Oxted, to be worked by the LB&SCR. The involvement of LB&SCR directors in this scheme was interpreted by the SER as a breach of the 1849 agreement, and in retaliation the SER and LC&DR obtained Parliamentary approval to build a rival 'London, Lewes and Brighton Railway', which would undermine the profitable LB&SCR monopoly to that town.[21] Neither scheme was proceeded with.

Newhaven Harbour

Following the opening of the branch from

Chemins de Fer de l'Ouest introduced the Newhaven–Dieppe passenger service.[23] In 1878 the railway formed and underwrote the Newhaven Harbour Company and thereafter delegated responsibility for its operation to it.[24]

Growth of the London suburbs

A 1908 Railway Clearing House map, showing the Sutton & Mole Valley Lines though South London

Largely as a result of the railway, the rural area between

commuters
who were beginning to live in the south London suburbs and working in central London.

As part of its suburban expansion, the LB&SCR built a

Mitcham to Sutton and Epsom Downs
, which opened in October 1868.

Deterioration of relations with the SER

Relations between the LB&SCR and the SER and the interpretation of the 1848 agreement continued to be difficult throughout the 1850s and 1860s. They reached a low point in 1863 when the SER produced a report for its shareholders outlining a long list of the difficulties between the two companies, and the reasons why they considered that the LB&SCR had broken the 1848 agreement.[25]

The main areas of disagreement listed were at

Victoria, a proposed LB&SCR branch to Bromley, the new LB&SCR line to Dorking, LB&SCR opposition to the SER attempts at building a line to the west end, the LB&SCR agreement to let the LC&DR use its goods facilities at Bricklayers Arms, and the perennial problem of the shared main line between Redhill and Croydon
.

The most flagrant example of the lack of cooperation between the two companies, however, was with respect to the independent

Caterham Railway, which ran in South Eastern territory, but joined the Brighton mainline at the LB&SCR Godstone Road station (later renamed Caterham Junction). Both companies objected to the other operating the branch line, which resulted in a delay of a year between the completion of the work and the opening of the line in 1856. Their failure to agree on such matters as through ticketing quickly drove the independent company into bankruptcy. Even after the SER took over running of the branch in 1859, the squabbling and bloody mindedness continued to the great detriment of the passengers. Eventually the matters reached the leader columns of The Times newspaper in 1862 before the companies would negotiate with one another.[26]

The chronic congestion over the shared line between

East Croydon railway station and Redhill eased after 1 May 1868 when the route ceased to be on the South Eastern Main Line to Dover following the opening of the 'Sevenoaks cut off' line between St Johns and Tonbridge railway station.[27] A ten-year agreement between the SER and the LB&SCR over the use of the station and lines to Coulsdon was signed 1 February 1869 and renewed ten years later.[28]

1867 financial crisis and its impact

A 1910 Railway Clearing House map, showing part of the lines around Portsmouth

The collapse of the bankers Overend, Gurney and Company in 1866 and the financial crisis the following year brought the LB&SCR to the brink of bankruptcy.[29] A special meeting of shareholders was adjourned, and the powers of the board of directors were suspended pending receipt of a report into the financial affairs of the company and its prospects.[30] The report made clear that the LB&SCR had overextended itself with large capital projects sustained by profits from passengers, which suddenly declined as a result of the crisis. Several country lines were losing money – most notably between Horsham and Guildford, East Grinstead and Tunbridge Wells, and Banstead and Epsom – and the LB&SCR was committed to building or acquiring others with equally poor prospects.[31] The report was extremely critical of the policies of Schuster and the company secretary, Frederick Slight, both of whom resigned. It did however point out that these lines had been built or acquired as a means for preventing competition from neighbouring railways. The committee recommended the abandonment of several projects, and that the LB&SCR should enter into a working agreement with the SER.

The new board of directors accepted many of these recommendations, and they managed to persuade Samuel Laing to return as chairman. It was through his business acumen and that of the new secretary and general manager J. P. Knight that the LB&SCR gradually recovered its financial health during the early 1870s.[32]

As a result, all construction of lines was suspended. Three important projects then under construction were abandoned: the

Surrey and Sussex Junction Railway. The line between Tunbridge Wells and Eastbourne was shelved until the financial situation improved.[33] For the next decade, projects were limited to additional spurs or junctions in London and Brighton to enhance the operation of the network, or small-scale ventures in conjunction with other railway companies. The latter included a short line from Streatham through Tooting to Wimbledon in 1868, and a connection from Portsmouth Town to Portsmouth Harbour
in 1876, both jointly with the L&SWR.

The proposed 'working cooperation' with the SER never took effect but remained under active consideration by both parties, and later involved the LC&DR.[34] It was not until 1875 that the idea was dropped, after the SER pulled out of negotiations due to the conditions imposed by Parliament on the proposed merger. The LB&SCR continued as an independent railway but the SER and LCDR eventually formed a working relationship in 1899 with the formation of the South Eastern and Chatham Railway.

One new line to which the LB&SCR was committed was the

Liverpool Street Station
and Croydon.

Later 19th century

By the mid-1870s the LB&SCR had recovered its financial stability through a policy of encouraging the more intensive use of lines and reducing operating costs. Between 1870 and 1889 annual revenue rose from £1.3 million to £2.4 million, whilst its operating costs rose from £650,000 to just over £1 million.[35] The LB&SCR was able to embark upon new railway building and improvements to infrastructure. Some new lines passed through sparsely populated areas and merely provided shorter connections to towns that were already on the railway network, and so were unlikely to be profitable, but the LB&SCR found itself under pressure from local communities wanting a rail connection, and was frightened that they would otherwise be developed by rivals.

The main reason for the financial recovery lay in the exploitation of London suburban traffic. By the late 1880s the LB&SCR had developed the largest suburban network of any British railway, with 68 route miles (109 km) in the suburbs in addition to its main lines, in three routes between London Bridge and Victoria:

South London Line, the outer South London Line and the Crystal Palace lines, and the LB&SCR was earning more from season tickets than any other British railway. Thus an official return showed that the railway had operated more than 100,000 passenger trains from April to June 1889, more than any other company operating only in southern England.[37]

New routes and station improvements

The scheme to link Eastbourne with Tunbridge Wells was revived in April 1879 with the opening of a line connecting the Hailsham branch to

Heathfield, completed the following September from Heathfield to Eridge, and later known as the Cuckoo Line
.

In 1877 authority was granted to the Lewes and East Grinstead Railway (L&EGR), roughly parallel to the 'Cuckoo Line',[38] sponsored by local landowners, including the Earl of Sheffield, and including a branch from Horsted Keynes to Haywards Heath on the Brighton main line. A year later an act of 1878 enabled the LB&SCR to acquire and operate lines, opened in August 1882 and September 1883. The East Grinstead–Lewes line subsequently became known as the 'Bluebell line' and, following its closure in 1958, the section between Horsted Keynes and Sheffield Park was taken over by the Bluebell Railway Preservation Society.

The LB&SCR in West Sussex was largely complete by 1870 except for a link between Midhurst and Chichester, delayed by the financial crisis of 1867; this was revived and opened in 1881. Minor improvements around Littlehampton were made, and a branch to Devil's Dyke opened in 1887, built by and owned by an independent company but operated by the LB&SCR. In Hampshire the LB&SCR leased the Hayling Island branch line from 1874,[39] opened in 1865 as an independent concern.[40] The LB&SCR and the L&SWR jointly built a 1+14-mile (2 km) branch from a new station on their existing joint line at Fratton to East Southsea in 1887, but early in the 20th century had to compete with a tramway, and it was closed at the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914.[41]

Although the proposed Surrey and Sussex Junction Railway had been abandoned in 1867, there remained a demand from Croydon to towns such as East Grinstead, Tunbridge Wells and the East Sussex coast. The SER was looking for a relief route in the same general direction for its Tonbridge and Hastings services, and the two railways collaborated in a joint line between South Croydon, on the main Brighton line, and Oxted. Beyond Oxted, the LB&SCR would build its own lines to link with the Bluebell line at East Grinstead and its line to Tunbridge Wells. SER trains would join the line between Redhill and Tonbridge. Authority was granted in 1878 and they opened in 1884.

Brighton railway station was rebuilt and extended in 1882–83 with a new single roof, and Eastbourne was rebuilt in 1886 to cope with additional traffic.

1905 Map showing the LB&SCR "Quarry line" and the original SER line

Congestion and slow trains

With the steady growth of traffic in the South London suburbs during the 1880s and early 1890s, the LB&SCR was the subject of press criticism for poor timekeeping and slow trains,[42] although it was never subjected to the levels of press and public obloquy accorded to the SER. Two of the reasons for poor timekeeping were the volume of traffic generated and the complexity of the LB&SCR network north of Redhill with large numbers of junctions and signals.[43] A further complication was that both the LB&SCR and the SER shared the 11 miles (18 km) of track between Redhill and East Croydon. This part of the line was owned by the SER, which (according to Acworth) gave its trains precedence through the junctions at Redhill,[44] but the LB&SCR paid an annual fee of £14,000 for its use. Relations with the SER began to deteriorate once more and eventually both companies appointed Henry Oakley general manager of the Great Northern Railway as an independent assessor in 1889. Oakley supported the LB&SCR right to use the line but increased the annual payment to £20,000.[28] However this did not solve the problem and an 1896 study of LB&SCR passenger services, by J. Pearson Pattinson described the 8+14 miles (13.3 km) of shared track between Redhill and Stoats Nest (Coulsdon) as being 'in a state of the utmost congestion, and detentions of the Brighton expresses, blocked by South Eastern stopping trains, are as constant as irritating.'[45]

Quarry line

Ultimately the only solution was for the LB&SCR to build its own line between

Redhill, cuttings, embankments and a covered way at Cane Hill Hospital
. The line opened on 8 November 1899 (1 April 1900 for passengers).

20th century

During its last 20 years the LB&SCR opened no new lines, but invested in improving its main line and London terminals, together with the electrification of its London suburban services.

Sketch map of LB&SCR routes in 1922

Following the completion of the Quarry line, the bottleneck on the heavily used main line moved further south. Plans were drawn up for the quadrupling throughout, but only the 16 miles (26 km) from Earlswood to Three Bridges were completed, between 1906 and 1909. A fifth track was laid between Norwood Junction and South Croydon in 1907–08. Extension beyond Three Bridges would have involved heavy engineering at Balcombe tunnel, over the Ouse Valley Viaduct and through the South Downs. The required capital expenditure was diverted to extending the electrification programme.

Unlike other mainline railway companies, the LB&SCR had to share both its London termini with its rivals,

Victoria with the LC&DR. The rapid increase in commuting towards the end of the 19th century created an urgent need to expand the cramped and limited facilities at Victoria. During the first decade of the new century the line between Grosvenor Bridge and Victoria was widened and the station rebuilt on a much larger scale. A new turntable and locomotive servicing facilities enabled the use of more powerful locomotives. During the same period LB&SCR facilities at London Bridge were enlarged, but since the station had been rebuilt so many times it remained a 'sprawling confusion'.[48]

Motive power shortage

Between 1905 and 1912 the LB&SCR suffered an increasingly serious motive power shortage due to the inability of

L.B. Billinton
.

The First World War

The LB&SCR War Memorial, London Victoria Station

With other British railways the LB&SCR was brought under government control during the

Newhaven This included nearly 7 million tons of goods, including 2.7 million tons of explosives. It necessitated an additional 53,376 goods trains over the four years of the war.[51]

Newhaven harbour also received casualties landing in hospital ships, with the railway providing ambulance trains.[52] There were several army camps within the territory of the LB&SCR which therefore provided 27,366 troop trains.[51] Army horses awaiting shipping to France were stabled at Farlington Racecourse.[53]

At the outbreak of hostilities the area surrounding Newhaven Port was requisitioned and the Harbour station closed. From 22 September 1916 Newhaven became a special military area for handling Government traffic under the Defence of the Realm Regulations.[54]

This additional traffic required substantial improvements to infrastructure, notably at Newhaven harbour, where additional warehousing, new sidings and signalling constructed and electric lighting was installed. When Newhaven became overwhelmed the tidal port of Littlehampton was rebuilt and pressed into service.[55] Inland, a much enlarged goods marshalling yard was established at Three Bridges, which was chosen as a nodal point for handling War traffic. At Gatwick and Haywards Heath, passing loops were constructed so that the frequent passenger trains would not be impeded by slower goods trains and to hold munitions trains during air raids. Some munitions trains were routed to Newhaven via the Steyning Line to Brighton to avoid congesting the part of the Brighton main line which had only two tracks. Between 1914 and 1918, 5,635 members of LB&SCR staff joined the forces, creating staff shortages at all levels (including the Chief Mechanical Engineer who was called up for service in Russia and Roumania).[56] This necessitated the employment of female labour in clerical grades and for carriage cleaning.[57] The railway erected a War Memorial at London Bridge in 1920 honouring the 532 staff who had lost their lives. Likewise, in April 1922, the last locomotive to be constructed by the company, 4-6-4T 'L' Class No. 333, was named 'Remembrance' and carried a memorial plaque.[58]

LB&SCR at Grouping

By 31 December 1922, when the LB&SCR ceased to have an independent existence, it had 457 miles (735 km) of route. Of these, 100 mi (161 km) was single track, 357 mi (575 km) double track, 47 mi (76 km) triple track, and 49 mi (79 km) four or more tracks. Sidings had a total length of 355 miles (571 km).[59] According to Bonavia, 'the Brighton was a highly individual line in its strengths and weaknesses, it was to experience drastic changes under Southern [Railway] management which older members of the staff would not always accept gracefully.'[60]

Train services

The LB&SCR was essentially a passenger-carrying concern, with goods and mineral traffic playing a limited role in its receipts. As originally envisaged the railway was a trunk route, conveying passengers (and to a lesser extent goods) between London, Croydon and the south coast, with relatively little traffic to and from stations in between. However, the railway's existence began to generate new goods and passenger traffic at towns and villages on or near the main line, such as

Newhaven harbour
was also a stimulus to the development of both categories of traffic.

The speed and punctuality of many LB&SCR passenger services was the subject of widespread criticism in the technical and popular press during the 1890s.[61] This was in part due in part to the complexity of the system between London and Croydon, with a large number of signals and junctions, the sharing of stretches of line with the SER, and the relatively short routes, which gave little opportunity to make up for lost time. The LB&SCR gradually began to rebuild its reputation during the 20th century through improvements to mainline infrastructure and electrification of suburban services.

Express passenger services

The company had no long-distance express trains, with a maximum journey length of 75 miles (121 km). Nevertheless, frequent express passenger services ran to the most important coastal destinations from both London Bridge and Victoria. Season ticket revenue, particularly from Brighton to London, was the backbone of the LB&SCR's finances for most of the 19th century.[62] The morning rush hour business services were among "the heaviest express services in the world" in the 1880s, with loads of 360 tons.[44]

Individual Pullman cars were introduced to Britain on the Midland Railway in 1874, followed by the Great Northern Railway soon after and the LB&SCR in 1875.[63] The LB&SCR pioneered all-Pullman trains in England, the Pullman Limited Express on 5 December 1881. It consisted of four cars built at the Pullman Car Company workshops in Derby, Beatrice, Louise, Maud and Victoria, the first electrically lit coaches on a British railway. The train made two down and two up trips per day, one each way on Sundays. It was renamed the Brighton Pullman Limited in 1887, and first-class carriages were attached. A new train was built in 1888: three Pullmans were shipped over in parts from the Pullman Palace Car Company in America, and assembled by the LB&SCR at Brighton.

The Brighton Limited was introduced on 2 October 1898. It ran only on Sundays, and not in July–September. It was timed to make the journey from Victoria in 60 minutes: "London to Brighton in one hour" was the advertisement used for the first time. On 21 December 1902 it made a record run of 54 minutes. It hit the headlines again when, faced with the threat of a competing electric railway being built from London to Brighton, it ran to Brighton in 48 minutes 41 seconds and the return to London in 50 minutes 21 seconds, matching the schedule put forward by the promoters of the electric line.

The Southern Belle, introduced 8 November 1908, was described as "the most luxurious train in the World." By 1910 two trips each way were running every day; later three were run on Sundays. Third-class Pullman cars began running on Sunday 12 September 1915 from Victoria to Brighton and Eastbourne
.

Stopping trains

Slower passenger services between London and the south coast often divided at East Croydon to serve both the London termini, and combined there for down trains, so East Croydon had an important nodal function in the system.[64] After 1867, following the opening of the direct line to Horsham, Sutton acted as a similar node for passenger trains between London and Portsmouth.

Slip coaches

The LB&SCR appears to have invented the practice of slipping coaches from the rear of express trains at intermediate stations for onward transmission to branch lines or smaller stations on the main line. The earliest recorded example was at Haywards Heath in February 1858, where coaches for Hastings were slipped from a London–Brighton express.[65] The slipping was coordinated by a series of communication bell signals between the guards on the two portions of the train and the locomotive crew.[66]

Before 1914, twenty-one coaches were slipped each day on the Brighton main line.[67] Coaches were slipped at Horley and Three Bridges for stations to East Grinstead, Forest Row and Horsham, or at Haywards Heath for stations to Brighton and Eastbourne. The practice continued until the electrification of the main line in 1932.[68]

London suburban traffic

After 1870, the LB&SCR greatly encouraged commuters into London by reducing the prices of season tickets and introducing special

tank engine classes such as the Terrier and D1 classes under William Stroudley. R. J. Billinton replaced these with the D3, E3, E4, and E5
classes designed for London suburban services, during the 1890s. When steam locomotives became unable to cope with the increased suburban traffic and competition from electric trams in the early 20th century, it resulted in the electrification of the London suburban network.

Excursion and holiday traffic

A LB&SCR poster advertising the Isle of Wight

Excursion trains from London to the South Coast and the Sussex countryside had been introduced in 1844,[71] and were a feature of the LB&SCR throughout its existence. Special fares to Brighton and other south coast resorts on summer Sundays and at bank holidays were regularly advertised in the press. Likewise, special trains serving the regular fetes and exhibitions at Crystal Palace during the summer months.

After 1870 the LB&SCR sought to develop the holiday and excursion trade and market other south coast resorts such as Hayling Island and the Isle of Wight as holiday destinations, by publishing a range of attractive posters. On the Isle of Wight the LB&SCR and the L&SWR jointly took over the ferry service from Portsmouth and built new pier at Ryde with a short line to the station at St John's Road in 1880. During the 1900s the company ran special Sunday trains to enable London cyclists to explore the Sussex and Surrey countryside.[72] By 1905 the railway was offering day trips to Dieppe and circular tickets, valid for a month, to enable Londoners to explore towns along the South Coast.[73]

In 1904 the Great Western Railway inaugurated holiday trains during the summer months from Birkenhead to Brighton and Eastbourne, in conjunction with the LB&SCR. The following year LB&SCR and L&NWR jointly operated the Sunny South Special from Liverpool and Manchester to these destinations. These trains operated via the West London lines, with the LB&SCR responsible for their operation from Kensington or Willesden.[74]

The LB&SCR served important Horse racing tracks at Brighton, Epsom, Gatwick, Goodwood, Lewes, Lingfield and Plumpton, and Portsmouth Park (Farlington). Race day special trains were an important source of revenue during the summer months.[75]

1906 poster advertising rail motor services

Rail motor services

During the first few years of the 20th century the LB&SCR, in common with other railways, became concerned about losses on branch and short-distance passenger services, particularly in winter. The L&SWR and the LB&SCR boards decided to investigate the use of steam powered railcars on the 1+14-mile (2 km) joint branch line between Fratton and East Southsea, in June 1903. The locomotive and carriage units were both built by the L&SWR, but one of the carriages was painted in the LB&SCR livery. The two vehicles had to be quickly withdrawn as they were found to be chronically underpowered, but were rebuilt with larger boilers and thereafter gave adequate service. However, their use did not stem the loss of traffic to the roads and in 1914 the branch was closed.[76]

Nevertheless, the LB&SCR directors asked the Chief Mechanical Engineer,

overhead electrification of the London suburban lines.[78]

During the experiments relating to railcars and motor trains, the LB&SCR constructed unmanned halts, such as

Arun Valley Line
, in an attempt to increase passenger revenue.

Freight services

Freight represented a relatively small part of the LB&SCR's finances during its first half century. Agricultural goods and general merchandise were carried, together with wine, foodstuffs and manufactured goods imported from France. During the 1870s the pattern of goods services slowly began to change, leading to rapid growth in the 1890s, 'caused by the transport of raw materials and finished products of entirely new industries such as petroleum, cement, brick and tile manufacture, forestry and biscuit making.'[79] This resulted in the construction of 55 goods locomotives of the C2 class

There were no coal mines within LB&SCR territory, and so it had to pay substantially more for its fuel than most other companies.[80] The bulk of its coal was brought in 800 long tons (810 t) trains from Acton yard on the Great Western Railway to Three Bridges for redistribution, and the LB&SCR kept two goods locomotives at the GWR Westbourne Park Depot for this purpose.[81] In 1898 there was a scheme to develop Deptford Wharf for the landing of coal by sea.[82] The additional fuel costs were partially offset by the sale of shingle for rail ballast from Pevensey.[83]

The main London goods depot was at 'Willow Walk', part of the

marshalling yard to the south of Norwood Junction during the 1870s, extended in the early 1880s.[87] Other freight handling facilities outside London were at: Brighton
(where there was a separate goods station at, adjacent to the passenger station), Eastbourne, Hastings, Littlehampton, Portsmouth, Newhaven, Seaford, and Three Bridges.

Electrification

Construction of overhead electrical lines, c. 1908
South London Line
at Wandsworth Road station, about 1909

Proposals for a London and Brighton Electric Railway made to Parliament in 1900 failed to proceed, but caused the LB&SCR to consider

electrification.[88][89] Also, competition from the introduction of trams in London meant that annual traffic over the circuitous 8+12-mile (14 km) route between Victoria and London Bridge stations had dropped from 8 million to 3 million journeys by 1908.[90] Because of the nature of its traffic with a very large number of commuter journeys over relatively short distances, the railway was an obvious candidate for electrification, and had sought powers for suburban lines in 1903. Third and fourth rail direct current electrification had been chosen for the underground tube railways and the Metropolitan Railway and District Railway in London, the Mersey Railway in Liverpool and the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Liverpool to Southport line. However the LB&SCR foresaw electrification of its main line, and ultimately to Portsmouth and Hastings, and therefore decided on a high-tension overhead supply system at 6,600 volts AC
.

Although the

Lancaster to Morecambe and Heysham had been the first to use overhead lines, the LB&SCR lines covered a far greater length of track. This system was of German origin and the contractor for the electrical equipment was Allgemeine Elektricitäts Gesellschaft of Berlin, while the main contractor was Robert W Blackwell & Co Ltd. Power supply was from the London Electric Supply Corporation (LESCo) at Deptford.[89][91]

The first section was the

Peckham Rye to West Norwood. Repair shops were established at Peckham Rye, and carriage sheds at Norwood Junction
.

Continued success and profitability of its earliest projects caused the LB&SCR to decide to electrify all remaining London suburban lines in 1913. However, the outbreak of war the following year delayed what was planned to have been considerable further mileage of electrified line. By 1921 most of the inner London suburban lines were electrified, and during 1922 lines to Coulsdon and Sutton, opened on 1 April 1925. During 1920 plans were drawn up to extend the 'Elevated Electric' to Brighton, Worthing, Eastbourne, Newhaven and Seaford, and to Epsom and Oxted, but these were overtaken by the Grouping.[94]

The 'Elevated Electric' proved to be a technical and financial success,[95] but was short-lived since the L&SWR had adopted the third-rail system: its mileage far exceeded that of the LB&SCR. In 1926 the Southern Railway announced that, as part of a huge electrification project, all overhead lines were to be converted to third rail, thus bringing all lines into a common system. The last overhead electric train ran on 22 September 1929.[89][96]

Accidents and signalling control

Semaphore signalling and signal boxes were first introduced on the L&CR and had been adopted by the L&BR as early as the 1840s. There were a number of serious accidents in the early years of the LB&SCR, some due to failures in communication.[97] The LB&SCR began to improve its safety record in the 1860s with the introduction of interlocking,[98] and the early introduction of Westinghouse air brakes. Given the large number of junctions and the intensive use of its system, the LB&SCR maintained a good safety record during the last half century of its existence.

The following accidents occurred on the LB&SCR:

Signalling and signal boxes

The signal box at Crawley built by Saxby and Farmer in 1877

The LB&SCR originally used semaphore for home signals and 'double disc' for distant signals, but after 1872 semaphore signals were used for both purposes.

The LB&SCR was using primitive interlocking between signals at some junctions by 1844.

Saxby & Farmer signalling contractors. Thereafter the LB&SC patronised Saxby & Farmer for most of its signalling until circa 1880.[116] Thereafter it adopted the Sykes 'Lock and block' system used on the LC&DR.[118]

The LB&SCR inherited the world's first signal boxes, at Bricklayers Arms Junction and Brighton Junction (Norwood). After 1880 it gradually developed its own architecture for signal boxes, using home-produced and contractor-built frames. J. E. Annett, the inventor of Annett's key in 1875, a portable form of interlocking, was a former LB&SCR employee.

During the remodelling of

Victoria Station between 1898 and 1908 it was resignalled using the Sykes electromechanical method for controlling points and signals, allowing for more compact signal boxes.[119]

Rolling stock

For the greater part of its existence the LB&SCR relied upon

electric multiple units for passenger traffic and by steam for freight. It experimented with two petrol railcars in 1906 and 1907, but these proved to be underpowered and highly unreliable and were soon taken out of traffic.[120]

The LB&SCR under Stroudley was one of the first railways in Britain to adopt the Westinghouse air brake after 1877[121] in preference to the far less effective vacuum brakes employed by its neighbours.

Steam locomotives

The LB&SCR inherited 51 steam locomotives from the

Brighton, Croydon and Dover Joint Committee, and it built or purchased 1,055 locomotives.[122]
Of these, 620 were handed over to the Southern Railway on 1 January 1923.

The LB&SCR achieved early fame as the first railway to use the

Locomotive Superintendent from 1847 to 1869, was to design locomotives for each task or type of traffic. Many of his designs were capable locomotives, but with 72 different classes in use at the time of William Stroudley
's appointment in 1870, the policy was hopelessly uneconomic.

Stroudley reduced this to 12 main classes, many with interchangeable parts, by 1888.

turntables, notably at Victoria. The high price of coal encouraged him to experiment with condensing apparatus.[123][124]

Stroudley's successor

C2 class
.

tank engines, and a very poor C3 class of 0-6-0, freight locomotives, which proved to perform worse than the locomotives they were due to replace. However, he found that by rebuilding Billinton's unsuccessful C2 class with his newly designed C3 boiler he was at last able to produce a successful freight design for the railway in the form of the C2X class
.

The last

Southern Railway at grouping in 1923.[126]

LB&SCR locomotive designs had little impact on the locomotive policy of the Southern Railway after 1923 because they were built to a more generous

British Railways in 1948, compared with 57.9% for the L&SWR and 56.8% for the SE&CR.[127]

Electric traction

The electrified lines were operated by

SR multiple unit numbering and classification

Coaching stock

LB&SCR coach no. 661 at Horsted Keynes, Bluebell Railway

The jobs of

communication cords.[129]
The LB&SCR introduced breakfast cars to its main business trains.

The appointment of Albert Panter as Carriage and Wagon Works Manager under Robert Billinton in 1898 (Carriage and Wagon Superintendent from 1912) led to the introduction of bogie carriages for mainline trains in 1905,[132] but suburban services were operated by six-wheeled "block trains" with solid wooden buffers, permanently tight coupled in sets of ten or 12.[133] Many of these were still in use at grouping in 1923. Better vehicles appeared early in the 20th century with the 'Balloon stock' and electric stock.[134]

Sixteen carriages of LB&SCR origin have been preserved, including one luxurious "Directors' saloon" of 1914: these are principally on the Bluebell Railway and the Isle of Wight Steam Railway.[135] A number of grounded carriage bodies used as holiday homes survive.

Wagons

Sixteen wagons formerly in LB&SCR ownership now survive, largely because the Southern Railway transferred them to the Isle of Wight, where they remained in use until the 1960s.[136]

Liveries

After 1870 the LB&SCR was renowned for the attractiveness of its locomotives and coaching stock and condition of its country stations. "No company, even the North-Western itself turns out smarter looking trains than the Brighton main line expresses and even some of the suburban trains."[137]

Between 1846 and 1870 passenger locomotives were painted

sea green
or varnished wood, the latter mainly first class stock.

B2 Class 213 Bessemer 1897, in Stroudley's "Improved Engine Green"

From 1870 to 1905 the livery was Stroudley's famous Improved Engine Green, a golden

tank locomotives, to a wheel splasher on tender locomotives. The letters were edged with a thin red line and given depth with black shading. This livery was one of the most ornate and distinctive used on British locomotives, and is remembered with nostalgia. Carriages were all mahogany in colour, with white roofs and black chassis gear. Initially the wood of the body was varnished, but as it became harder to maintain a high-quality varnish finish and it was painted in a similar-coloured paint. Panel lining and other details were picked out with gold leaf
.

From 1905 to 1923 front-line express locomotives were a dark shade of umber. Lining was black with a gilt line either side. Cab roofs remained white. Frames were black, wheels umber, and buffer beams returned to signal red. The company's initials were painted on the tender- or tank-sides (initially 'L.B.& S.C.R.', but after 1911 the ampersand and the R were removed) in gilt. Secondary passenger locomotives had the same livery, but instead of gilt lining chrome yellow paint was used. Goods engines were gloss black with double vermilion lining. Names and numbers were in white letters with red shading. Carriages were initially all olive green with white lining and detailing. From 1911 this changed to plain umber with black lettering picked out with gold shading.

Ferry services and ships

A map showing the main LB&SCR ferry routes in 1888

The LB&SCR invested in cross-channel ferry services, initially from Shoreham to Dieppe. Following the opening of the line to

Newhaven in 1847, it improved Newhaven harbour, building a wharf and dredging the channel. A Newhaven–Dieppe service was established in 1847, but discontinued soon afterwards.[138] In 1850 it established a Newhaven–Jersey ferry service, and in 1853 it reinstated the Dieppe service.[138]

The

First World War
.)

In 1863, the LB&SCR transferred the Jersey service to Littlehampton and soon afterwards established another between Littlehampton and Honfleur.

By 1880 lines connected the Ryde Pier and the Portsmouth Harbour ferry terminals. It was therefore a natural progression for the companies to acquire the ferry routes. To do this the LB&SCR and the L&SWR formed the South Western and Brighton Railway Companies Steam Packet Service (SW&BRCSPS), which bought the operators.[23]

In 1884 the Isle of Wight Marine Transit Company started a goods rail ferry between the

Hayling Island Branch Line at Langstone and the Bembridge branch line at St Helens quay. The rail ferry PS Carrier, designed to carry railway trucks, was moved from Scotland. The project was unsuccessful and, despite being acquired by the LB&SCR in 1886, ended in 1888.[141]

The LB&SCR operated a significant number of ships in its own right, jointly with

Chemins de Fer de l'Ouest, and as a part of the SW&BRCSPS. See List of LB&SCR ships

Structures, buildings and civil engineering

The LB&SCR inherited significant structures, buildings and other civil engineering features, including:

The entrance to Horsted Keynes railway station typical of several late Victorian LB&SCR country stations in Sussex

Stations

The LB&SCR inherited or built 20 termini, the most significant at

East Croydon, Three Bridges, Horsham, and Lewes
.

The use of Mocatta's modular station designs was not perpetuated. During the 1850s and 1860s most stations were constructed according to one or two stock designs prepared by the Chief Engineers, R. Jacomb-Hood and Frederick Banister (1860–1895). Banister had a love of Italianate architecture, meaning that during the 1880s the LB&SCR produced elaborate decorated architecture for many country stations, notably on the Bluebell and Cuckoo Lines.[142] The architect was Banister's son-in-law, Thomas Myres.[143]

Workshops and motive power depots

The L&BR established a repair workshop at Brighton in 1840. Between 1852 and 1957 more than 1,200 steam locomotives and prototype diesel electric and electric locomotives were constructed there, before closure in 1962. It had small locomotive repair facilities at New Cross and Battersea Park Depots in London.

By the first decade of the 20th century, Brighton works could no longer cope with the repair and building of both locomotives and rolling stock. In 1911 the LB&SCR built a carriage and wagon works at

Newhaven.[144]

There were

The headquarters and main offices were at

London Bridge

Hotels

The LB&SCR opened the Terminus Hotel at London Bridge and the Grosvenor Hotel at Victoria in 1861. The first of these was not successful due to its site on the south bank and was turned into offices for the railway in 1892. It was destroyed by bombing in 1941. The Grosvenor Hotel was rebuilt and enlarged in 1901.[146] The LB&SCR acquired the Terminus Hotel next to Brighton station in 1877,[147] and operated the London and Paris Hotel at Newhaven.[148]

The LB&SCR as an investment

The 1867 report by the railway found that there had been 'a reckless disregard for shareholders' interests for many years.'.[149] As a result, the company policies were several times subjected to criticism in pamphlets published during the 1870s and 1880s.[150] The matter was settled in 1890 when the economist and editor of the Financial Times, William Ramage Lawson, conducted a detailed analysis of the financial performance and prospects of the LB&SCR, comparing it with other British railways. He concluded that the Brighton Deferred stock 'combined the highest return on investment, with the best prospect of future appreciation and the smallest risk of retrogression.'[151] Among the reasons given for this opinion were:

  • Well established route and freedom from competition
  • Varied and well distributed sources of traffic
  • Moderate working expenses due to high quality construction of the original route and good maintenance.
  • Energetic and prudent management

From 1870 the LB&SCR appears to have been a well-run, enterprising and profitable railway for its shareholders.

Notable people

Chairmen of the board of directors

Members of the board of directors

Managers

  • Peter Clarke(1846–1848) – Manager
  • George Hawkins (1849–1850) – Goods Manager
  • ? Pountain (1849–1850) – Non Goods Manager
  • George Hawkins (1849–1850) – Traffic Manager
  • John Peake Knight
    (1869–1870) – Traffic Manager
  • John Peake Knight
    (1870–1886) general manager
  • Sir Allen Sarle (1886–1897) general manager
  • John Francis Sykes Gooday (1897–1899) general manager
  • William de Guise Forbes
    (1899–1922) general manager

Secretaries

  • T.J. Buckton (1846–1849)
  • Frederick Slight (1849–1867)
  • Sir Allen Sarle (1867–1898) from 1886 to 1898 also general manager
  • J.J. Brewer (1898–1922)

Chief engineers

Locomotive superintendents

Carriage and wagon superintendent

  • Albert Panter (1912–1922)

Fireman

  • Curly Lawrence known as LBSC, one of Britain's most prolific and well known model or scale-steam-locomotive designers, was employed as a fireman on the LB&SCR as a young man, and took the shortened version of its initials as his pseudonym.

Industrial relations

For its time, the LB&SCR was regarded as a good employer. In 1851 it created a benevolent fund for staff who had become incapacitated, and from 1854 operated a savings bank. In 1867 there was a two-day strike involving the

superannuation fund was established for higher grades of staff, extended to become a pension fund for all staff in 1899.[154]

Labour relations between the railway management, locomotive crews and Brighton works staff declined markedly in the period 1905 and 1910 leading to several strikes and sackings.[155] This was partly due to increased union militancy and to the intransigency of the Locomotive Superintendent Douglas Earle Marsh. This situation improved under Marsh's successor.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ The cross and sword (top) represents London, the two dolphins (bottom) Brighton, the three half-lions half-ships (right) the Cinque Ports, and the star and crescent (left) Portsmouth.

References

  1. ^ a b The Railway Year Book for 1920. London: The Railway Publishing Company Limited. 1920. p. 189.
  2. ^ White (1961), pp. 84, 99.
  3. ^ Turner (1977), pp. 253–71.
  4. ^ Burtt (1975), 19.
  5. ^ Turner (1978), p. 34.
  6. ^ Turner (1978), p. 65.
  7. ^ Turner (1978), p. 23.
  8. ^ Sekon (1895), pp. 12–14.
  9. ^ a b Turner (1976), p. 29.
  10. ^ Turner (1976), pp. 79–82.
  11. ^ Turner (1976), 82–84.
  12. ^ Turner (1978), p. 51.
  13. ^ Jackson (1978), p. 101.
  14. ^ Turner (1978), p. 37.
  15. ^ Turner (1978), pp. 253–71.
  16. ^ Turner (1978), pp. 61–65.
  17. ^ Turner (1978), p. 126.
  18. ^ Turner (1978), pp. 85–88.
  19. ^ Awdry 1990, p. 187.
  20. ^ Turner (1978), pp. 98–100.
  21. ^ Turner (1978), pp. 170–71.
  22. ^ Pratt (1921), pp. 1032–33.
  23. ^ a b Jordan (1998).
  24. ^ Marx (2007), p. 49.
  25. ^ Eborall and Smiles (1867).
  26. ^ Spence (1952), pp. 27–59.
  27. ^ White (1961), p. 44.
  28. ^ a b Turner (1977), pp. 112–13.
  29. ^ Turner (1978), p. 262
  30. ^ London Brighton & South Coast Railway (1867).
  31. ^ London Brighton & South Coast Railway (1867), Appendix C.
  32. ^ Heap and van Riemsdijk (1980), p. 89.
  33. ^ Turner (1979), pp. 3–14.
  34. ^ 'Railway amalgamation', (1875), pp. 430–31.
  35. ^ Lawson (1891), p. 91.
  36. ^ Lawson (1891) pp. 6, 91.
  37. ^ 'Return of Running of Passenger Trains on Main and Branch Lines of London, Brighton and S. Coast, London, Chatham and Dover, London and S.W. and S.E. Railways, April–June 1889,' House of Commons Papers, 1889.
  38. ^ Awdry (1990), pp. 189–90.
  39. ^ Turner (1979), p. 66.
  40. ^ Turner (1978), pp. 137–40, 244–45.
  41. ^ Robertson (1985).
  42. ^ Ahrons, E.L. (1953). Locomotive and train working in the latter part of the nineteenth century. Vol. 5. Cambridge: Heffer and Sons. pp. 87–8.
  43. ^ Turner (1979), pp. 64-67.
  44. ^ a b Acworth (1888), p. 97
  45. ^ Ellis (1971), p. 172. quoting J. Pearson Pattinson, The London, Brighton & South Coast Railway, its Passenger Services, Rolling Stock, Locomotives, Gradients and Express Speeds, (Cassell, 1896).
  46. ^ Dendy Marshall (1968), p. 237.
  47. ^ Turner (1979), p. 118.
  48. ^ Heap and van Riemsdijk (1980), p. 78.
  49. ^ Marx (2007), p. 9.
  50. ^ Pratt (1921), pp. 1032–41.
  51. ^ a b Pratt (1921), pp. 1038–39.
  52. ^ Marx (2007), 55.
  53. ^ Marx (2007), 46.
  54. ^ Marx (2007), 49–51.
  55. ^ Marx (2007), 55–6.
  56. ^ Marx (2007), Chapter 5.
  57. ^ Marx (2007), 75–77.
  58. ^ Ellis, (1960), 209.
  59. ^ Marshall (1963), p. 248.
  60. ^ Bonavia (1987), p.19.
  61. ^ Ahrons (1953), vol. 5, pp. 62–65.
  62. ^ Acworth (1888), p. 91.
  63. ^ Burtt and Beckerlegge (1948).
  64. ^ Ahrons (1953), vol. 5, p. 47.
  65. ^ Ellis (1979), pp. 98–99.
  66. ^ Rich (1996), 118.
  67. ^ Gray (1977), pp. 86–87.
  68. ^ Fryer (1997).
  69. ^ Kidner (1984), p. 3.
  70. ^ 'Return from Great Northern, Great Eastern, London and N.W., Great Western, Midland, S.E., London, Chatham and Dover, London, Brighton and S. Coast, and London and S.W. Railway Companies of Arrival at London Stations of Passenger Trains, as shown in Time-Tables, 1890', House of Commons. Papers Number: 151, 1890.
  71. ^ Turner (1977), p. 187.
  72. ^ 'The London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Company Ran Its First Special Sunday Cycle Train to Horley, Three Bridges, and East Grinstead This Week'. Illustrated London News (London, England), Saturday, 11 May 1901; 698.
  73. ^ 'In the Tourist and Excursion Programme of the London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Company Will Be Found Announced Cheap Week-end Tickets to Be Issued on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday to Tall Places on the South Coast from Hastings to Portsmouth Inclusive, and to All Places in the Isle of Wight, Also to Dieppe, the Parisian's Favourite Seaside Resort.' Illustrated London News (Saturday, 15 July 1905) 106.
  74. ^ Dendy Marshall (1968), p. 240.
  75. ^ Riley (1967), p. 8.
  76. ^ Bradley (1974), pp. 60–61.
  77. ^ Bradley (1974), pp. 62–68.
  78. ^ Ellis (1971), p. 199.
  79. ^ Marx (2008), p. 19.
  80. ^ a b Acworth (1888), p. 98
  81. ^ Marx (2008), pp. 21–22.
  82. ^ Marx (2008), pp. 98–99.
  83. ^ Turner, J.T. Howard (1978), p. 175.
  84. ^ Turner (1978), p. 22.
  85. ^ Turner (1978), pp. 121, 232.
  86. ^ Turner, J.T. Howard (1978) p. 241 and Turner (1979), p. 154.
  87. ^ Turner (1979), p. 76.
  88. ^ Moody (1968).
  89. ^
  90. ^ Sherrington (1928), vol. 2 p. 235.
  91. ^ Marshall, (1963), p. 1.
  92. ^ Moody, (1968) pp. 6–7.
  93. ^ Sherrington (1928), vol. 2, p. 236.
  94. ^ Dawson (1921).
  95. ^ Richards (1923), p. 32.
  96. ^ Moody, (1968), p. 25.
  97. ^ Turner (1978), pp. 16–18, 292–95.
  98. ^ Turner (1978), pp. 285–88.
  99. ^ "Accident Archive:Accident at Falmer on 6th June 1851". Railway Archive. Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  100. ^ "Accident Archive:Accident at Ford on 27th November 1851". Railway Archive. Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  101. .
  102. ^ "Death on the tracks: A 19th century train crash". OpenLearn. The Open University. Retrieved 7 September 2016.
  103. ^ "Accident Archive: Accident at Croydon on 21st August 1854". Railway Archive. Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  104. ^ "Accident Archive: Accident at Falmer Incline on 3rd October 1859". Railway Archive. Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  105. ^ "Accident Archive: Accident at Clayton Tunnel on 25th August 1861". Railway Archive. Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  106. ^ "Accident Archive: Accident at Streatham on 29th May 1863". Railway Archive. Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  107. ^ "Accident Archive: Accident at New Cross on 23rd June 1869". Railway Archive. Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  108. .
  109. ^ "Accident Archive: Accident at Norwood Junction on 1st May 1891". Railway Archive. Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  110. ^ "Accident at Farlington, 1894". The Why and Wherefore. Railway Magazine. Vol. 123, no. 919. November 1977. p. 571.
  111. ^ .
  112. ^ "Accident Archive: Accident at Keymer Junction on 23rd December 1899". Railway Archive. Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  113. .
  114. ^ Esbester, Mike (15 October 2018). "Burns Awareness – past & present". Railway Work, Life & Death. Retrieved 12 March 2024.
  115. ^ .
  116. ^ a b Signal Boxes of the London, Brighton & South Coast Railway
  117. ^ Marshall (1978), p. 189.
  118. ^ Turner (1978), p. 99.
  119. ^ Gordon (1910), pp. 159–60.
  120. ^ Bradley (1974), pp. 64–65.
  121. ^ Bradley (1969), p. 173.
  122. ^ Baxter (1977), pp. 69–72.
  123. ^ Ellis (1979), p. 104.
  124. ^ Acworth (1888), p. 99.
  125. ^ Marx (2005), 46.
  126. ^ Bradley (1974), p. 126.
  127. ^ Riley (1967), p. 10.
  128. ^ Cooper (1990), p. 46.
  129. ^ a b Ellis (1979), p. 69.
  130. ^ Gray (1977), p. 123.
  131. ^ Acworth (1888), pp. 92–93.
  132. ^ Ellis (1979), p. 200.
  133. ^ Acworth (1888), p. 94).
  134. ^ Bonavia (1987), pp. 16–17.
  135. ^ Cooper (1990,) pp. 46–54.
  136. ^ Cooper (1990), pp. 55–64.
  137. ^ Acworth (1888), pp. 91–92.
  138. ^ a b Measom (1852), p. vi.
  139. ^ 25 & 26 Vict. c. lxviii 30 June 1862,
  140. ^ Acworth (1888), p. 101.
  141. ^ Acworth (1888), p. 105.
  142. ^ Hoard (1974), p. 22.
  143. ^ Green, Alan H. J. (July 2013). "The railway buildings of T. H. Myres". Newsletter of the Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society (159): 12.
  144. ^ Cooper (1981), p. 58.
  145. ^ Hawkins (1979).
  146. ^ 'Reconstruction of the Grosvenor Hotel' (1901).
  147. ^ Mitchell and Smith (1983), picture no. 5.
  148. ^ London Brighton and South Coast Railway Official Guide (1912), p. 262.
  149. ^ Ottley (1965) item 6741.
  150. ^ Ottley (1965) items 6742, 6745–6748.
  151. ^ Lawson (1891), p. 3.
  152. ^ a b c d e f g Bradshaw's Railway Manual, Shareholders' Guide and Official Directory for 1905. London: Henry Blacklock & Co. Ltd. p. 187.
  153. ^ 'Termination of the strike on the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway' (1867).
  154. ^ The London Brighton and South Coast Railway Co. 1846–1922 (1923), p. 14.
  155. ^ Marx (2005), 109–138.

Bibliography

External links