User:Onel5969/XfD log
Appearance
This is a log of all
Twinkle
's XfD module.
If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the
CSD U1
.
December 2020
- ) 16:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Notability is not inherited, most of the article is not about the subject, but about his ancestors. WP:GNG.
- Reason: Notability is not inherited, most of the article is not about the subject, but about his ancestors.
- ) 17:00, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth sourcing to meet WP:GNG. Most of the sourcing is about the article's ancestors, and notability is not inherited.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth sourcing to meet
- ) 17:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither WP:NALBUM- "charting" at #205 on a list of 200 doesn't count.
- Reason: Meets neither
- ) 12:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Lots of mentions, as you might expect of someone in the sphere of a star of Monroe's caliber. But not enough in-depth coverage of them specifically to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Lots of mentions, as you might expect of someone in the sphere of a star of Monroe's caliber. But not enough in-depth coverage of them specifically to pass
- ) 14:49, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted back in 2009, while there is new sourcing since then, still not enough sourcing however to pass WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Was deleted back in 2009, while there is new sourcing since then, still not enough sourcing however to pass
- ) 20:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither WP:NBASKETBALL.
- Reason: Meets neither
- ) 12:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently this is a redirect to brown coalcurrently points to Lignite, although it can also refer to sub-bituminous or sometimes even bituminous (e.g. in Germany). I would suggest that soft coal and brown coal both be turned into Dabs, both pointing to all 3 of the softer coal classifications.
- Reason: Currently this is a redirect to
- ) 14:03, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:SIGCOV, current sourcing includes two short blurbs, and then a rather nice review from a dubious source, Electronic Fun with Computer & Games. If there were several other reviews of that caliber, GNG would be met. One of the current sources (Telematch) doesn't even mention the game.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 14:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Simply does not meet WP:NMMA.
- Reason: Simply does not meet
- ) 16:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Might be a case of WP:NCREATIVE.
- Reason: Might be a case of
- ) 13:51, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Lot of c-list festival participation, but meets neither WP:NFILM. Would have redirected to the director, but his article was deleted last month (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazem Mollaie).
- Reason: Lot of c-list festival participation, but meets neither
- ) 18:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Deputy administrators don't pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deputy administrators don't pass
- ) 04:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Company which meets neither WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.
- ) 13:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth sourcing to pass WP:NAUTHOR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth sourcing to pass
- ) 19:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Notability is not inherited, no notability outside of her relationship with her mother. No in-depth coverage on her.
- ) 13:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither WP:NACADEMIC(the nice citation counts are not for this person).
- Reason: Meets neither
January 2021
- ) 16:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes either WP:NTOURS.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes either
- ) 13:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable stadium which does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Non-notable stadium which does not meet
- ) 14:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage included currently, or found through searches to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage included currently, or found through searches to pass
- ) 22:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Until they actually play for Gol Gohar Sirjan, they don't pass WP:NFOOTY.
- Reason: Until they actually play for Gol Gohar Sirjan, they don't pass
- ) 15:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Promotional article, written by an editor with a history of writing promotional articles. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Promotional article, written by an editor with a history of writing promotional articles. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 16:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass
- ) 21:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Organization which meets neither WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Organization which meets neither
- ) 16:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Notability is not inherited, most of the article is not about the subject, but about his ancestors. WP:GNG.
- Reason: Notability is not inherited, most of the article is not about the subject, but about his ancestors.
- ) 15:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero significant roles in notable films. Fails WP:GNGeither.
- Reason: Zero significant roles in notable films. Fails
- talk · contribs) 18:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not sure about this, but I would think that we can't cover every possible typo, would we have redirects for hhigh, higgh, highh?
- talk · contribs) 18:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not sure about this, but I would think that we can't cover every possible typo, would we have redirects for hhigh, higgh, highh?
- talk · contribs) 18:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target page. Perhaps it's a local joke name for the school?
- talk · contribs) 19:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Apparently, this is the post code for the school. If it is the only location which uses this post code, then this redirect is appropriate. However, I don't think that's the case.
- talk · contribs) 19:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Yet another implausible typo.
- ) 13:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: No indication of notability for this street. Deprodded without rationale or improvement.
- ) 16:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither WP:MUSICBIO. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage.
- Reason: Meets neither
- ) 00:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable high school conference. Fails WP:GNG. Searches turned up literally zero in-depth references from independent sources. Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago International Model United Nations and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GEMS World Academy Model United Nations.
- ) 21:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Just the usual political coverage one would expect. Fails WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Just the usual political coverage one would expect. Fails
- ) 20:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Perhaps a case of WP:MUSICBIO.
- Reason: Perhaps a case of
- ) 02:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither WP:ORGDEPTH. Not nearly enough in-depth coverage to pass either of those threshholds.
- Reason: Meets neither
- ) 13:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Local politician in a small community. Had an abortive run for NJ governor, and failed state senate candidacy. Fails WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Local politician in a small community. Had an abortive run for NJ governor, and failed state senate candidacy. Fails
- ) 12:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:MUSICBIO. The criteria is to "Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition." Coming in 15th in the semi-final doesn't quite hit that mark.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 13:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Nothing in the sourcing to indicate it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Nothing in the sourcing to indicate it passes
- ) 15:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not a plausible misspelling.
- ) 21:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While mentioned quite a few places, not a single in-depth reference from an independent source as required to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: While mentioned quite a few places, not a single in-depth reference from an independent source as required to meet
- ) 13:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Stadium which does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Stadium which does not meet
- talk · contribs) 19:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Typical school body organization, almost wholly sourced through primary sourcing. The non-primary sourcing is mere mentions, with no in-depth coverage. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Typical school body organization, almost wholly sourced through primary sourcing. The non-primary sourcing is mere mentions, with no in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 12:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While the co-operative of which it is a part is notable, this small dorm-like building (less than 60 students) is not notable by itself. Searches are difficult due to the Tolkien-themed name (don't know if that is why it was named such, but it is what makes searching difficult), but not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. Current sources include two primary sources, one blog, and one nice article. But the article is about the co-operative, not the house, although it is mentioned briefly in the article.
- Reason: While the co-operative of which it is a part is notable, this small dorm-like building (less than 60 students) is not notable by itself. Searches are difficult due to the Tolkien-themed name (don't know if that is why it was named such, but it is what makes searching difficult), but not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent, secondary sources to pass
- ) 13:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Successful businessman, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Successful businessman, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Been deleted twice before, and nothing has changed regarding his notability since the last deletion. While he has fought in Glory competitions, the standard is fighting for one of their world titles, which he has not. Fails WP:NKICK.
- Reason: Been deleted twice before, and nothing has changed regarding his notability since the last deletion. While he has fought in Glory competitions, the standard is fighting for one of their world titles, which he has not. Fails
- ) 15:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches turned up zero. The current single source in the article is not about this building. Has been knocked around, sent back to draft, returned to mainspace, all without significant improvement. Without sourcing, does not meet any notability criteria.
- ) 19:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NPOL
- ) 17:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLARthey meet.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 15:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 03:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable primary school.
- ) 12:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While claiming to be a secondary school, it is a K-9, which in the US would be classified as an elementary/middle school. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: While claiming to be a secondary school, it is a K-9, which in the US would be classified as an elementary/middle school. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth to pass
- ) 15:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean. Surplasma is not listed in target, and this does not seem a plausible search term for this person.
- ) 16:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass
- talk · contribs) 19:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Self-described as a pre-secondary school, this is a very small school in a village. Does not pass WP:GNG. Non-notable primary school.
- Reason: Self-described as a pre-secondary school, this is a very small school in a village. Does not pass
- ) 19:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: College stadium which does not pass either WP:GEOFEAT.
- Reason: College stadium which does not pass either
February 2021
- ) 13:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without explanation or improvement. Currently, it is wholly uncited, with no indication of notability. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without explanation or improvement. Currently, it is wholly uncited, with no indication of notability. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 18:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: With one borderline significant role (Twin Peaks), does not meet WP:GNG. Simply a working actress for a few years.
- Reason: With one borderline significant role (Twin Peaks), does not meet
- ) 20:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: A working actress, but truly zero significant roles. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: A working actress, but truly zero significant roles. Fails
- ) 22:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Should be a redirect, but an ip is insistent on recreating this article about a fictional character, which doesn't come close to having enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Zero real-world notability.
- Reason: Should be a redirect, but an ip is insistent on recreating this article about a fictional character, which doesn't come close to having enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 13:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was originally deleted through Prod. Then re-created as a redirect to the footballer WP:NBASKET.
- Reason: Was originally deleted through Prod. Then re-created as a redirect to the footballer
- ) 14:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable fictional character. Zero real world notability as per WP:GNG.
- Reason: Non-notable fictional character. Zero real world notability as per
- talk · contribs) 18:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I find it difficult to fathom that this is the only notable (or semi-notable) event which happened on this particular date.
- ) 18:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target. Seems to be an attempt at humor.
- ) 14:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches turned up a dearth of in-depth coverage. Meets neither WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Searches turned up a dearth of in-depth coverage. Meets neither
- ) 15:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:TOOSOON.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 17:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Routine coverage, and assistant coaches aren't automatically notable. Fails WP:NBASEBALL. Deprodded because he's on the Mets staff, but again, that doesn't meet NBASEBALL.
- Reason: Routine coverage, and assistant coaches aren't automatically notable. Fails
- ) 17:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but doesn't meet WP:NSCHOLAR. The response on the article talk page when the prod was removed is interesting.
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but doesn't meet
- ) 01:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Is not mentioned in the target article.
- ) 01:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in the target
- ) 01:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in the target.
- ) 01:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target article.
- ) 13:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While the series is clearly notable, this particular short does not pass WP:NFILM.
- Reason: While the series is clearly notable, this particular short does not pass
- ) 16:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage regarding real world notability to pass gng.
- ) 18:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
- ) 13:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently only sourced with primary sourcing, no in-depth coverage. Searches did not turn up anything either.
- ) 17:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Appears to only have a single significant role (WP:GNG.
- Reason: Appears to only have a single significant role (
- ) 16:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was soft deleted, then recreated. Still not enough in-depth coverage in searches to meet either WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Was soft deleted, then recreated. Still not enough in-depth coverage in searches to meet either
- ) 13:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Uganda Premier league isn't a WP:NFOOTY.
- Reason: Uganda Premier league isn't a
- ) 21:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable, only coverage, and even that is very limited, has to do with the sexual abuse charges, so WP:GNG. Might be an attempt at promotion, as the inclusion of the agencies he is currently with.
- Reason: Non-notable, only coverage, and even that is very limited, has to do with the sexual abuse charges, so
- talk · contribs) 13:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Government official, who's 15 minutes of fame surrounding a decision of his, garnered some brief mentions, but clearly not enough in-depth coverage to meet either WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Government official, who's 15 minutes of fame surrounding a decision of his, garnered some brief mentions, but clearly not enough in-depth coverage to meet either
- ) 16:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This festival certainly occurred, no question about it. And the Between the Covers source is good coverage. The issue is, that's the only in-depth source provided, and the only one I could find in searches. Several mentions on Books, but like the other sources currently provided, they only show the existence of the booklet, and don't speak to the notability of the event itself. Might be due to when it occurred, but searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: This festival certainly occurred, no question about it. And the Between the Covers source is good coverage. The issue is, that's the only in-depth source provided, and the only one I could find in searches. Several mentions on Books, but like the other sources currently provided, they only show the existence of the booklet, and don't speak to the notability of the event itself. Might be due to when it occurred, but searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes
- ) 16:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Searching is difficult due to the commonality of the band's name, but can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:MUSICBIO.
- Reason: Searching is difficult due to the commonality of the band's name, but can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 17:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target, unlikely alternate name
- ) 17:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Like the one I just nominated, not mentioned in article, unlikely alternate name.
- ) 18:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not meet either WP:GNG.
- Reason: Does not meet either
- ) 04:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Doesn't qualify as per WP:NPOL, news coverage is all local and routine.
- Reason: Doesn't qualify as per
- ) 15:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Unfortunately notability is not inherited, having famous friends does not make one notable. Not enough in-depth coverage about them to meet WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Unfortunately notability is not inherited, having famous friends does not make one notable. Not enough in-depth coverage about them to meet
- ) 15:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 15:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Working stunt man, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Working stunt man, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 15:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable primary school.
- ) 04:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG. Notability is not inherited.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show they pass
- ) 04:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Working model with lots of promotional coverage, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Working model with lots of promotional coverage, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 15:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While it apparently is different from the prior version deleted through AfD, the same issues still apply.
- ) 12:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: A working stuntman, but meets neither WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: A working stuntman, but meets neither
- ) 12:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Came across this during NPP this morning, where another editor had put a CSD tag on it. Since it doesn't really qualify for CSD, I brought it here. This editor has no credits for Magellan in his article. The other editor, Sprachraum, wrote the following in their CSD: "For three years, this has been a nonsensical relink to the page of a film editor who had nothing to do with any film named "Magellan". As can be seen in the history, the root cause is that Brinlong created an article draft for the film Magellan (2017) in the main article space instead on his user subpage – then copied the Infobox film from Interstellar, left part of those details in the box, including Interstellar editor Lee Smith, and abandoned the "article" in a state not even close to a legitimate stub. Along came Bovineboy2008, placed a relink to Lee (not-the-editor-of Magellan). Which also caused a 2007 film of the same name to link to Lee Smith in the article L'est Films Group! Since there are even more films named Magellan, this page should be deleted completely, because any future article creations should be titled Magellan (2007 film), Magellan (2017 film), etc. I have written to both users here, and while Brinlong is inactive since February 3, Bovineboy2008 has agreed to the deletion."
- ) 12:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes WP:MUSICBIO.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes
- ) 14:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable elementary school.
- ) 20:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without comment or improvement. There does not appear to be anything significant about this particular election.
- ) 14:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 16:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 13:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While it does appear that the film did begin production, that is not an actual requirement of WP:NFILM.
- Reason: While it does appear that the film did begin production, that is not an actual requirement of
- ) 04:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 06:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to meet
March 2021
- ) 22:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NSCHOLAR, with a high citation count of 61 and an h index of 8.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 12:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Promotional article, which searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Promotional article, which searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show it passes
- talk · contribs) 12:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: No indication of anything notable about this particular election about this particular position. Perhaps the overall election cycle.
- ) 14:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Simply does not meet either WP:NBUILDING. Mere existence and some notable folks playing there does not constitute notability. Searches turned up virtually zero in-depth coverage.
- Reason: Simply does not meet either
- ) 12:31, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero real world notability. Simple brief mentions, fails WP:GNG.
- ) 00:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Even though it was just deleted through AfD, an editor insists it go through again, removing the appropriate speedy G4 tag.
- ) 14:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage (simply routine) to pass WP:NBASKET.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage (simply routine) to pass
- ) 16:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: None of the criteria of WP:NSCHOLARseem to be met, h-index of 8, high citation count of 53, and assistant professorship just doesn't make it.
- Reason: None of the criteria of
- ) 16:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-existent album, which was the genesis for another album, Recovery, where all pertinent info is covered. Most of this article was copied from that article, (see page history). Should be a redirect, but another editor insists on recreating, so bringing it here for consensus.
- ) 19:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Can't find any in-depth coverage of this individual. Does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Can't find any in-depth coverage of this individual. Does not meet
- ) 15:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. While this street existed, not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. While this street existed, not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 16:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 17:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth sourcing from independent reliable sources. Currently only promotional or primary sourcing is contained in the article. Does not meet WP:NFILM.
- Reason: Zero in-depth sourcing from independent reliable sources. Currently only promotional or primary sourcing is contained in the article. Does not meet
- ) 12:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 20:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "He played Caribbean Series." However, being a regional tournament, not sure that is of the level to pass WP:NBASEBALL.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "He played Caribbean Series." However, being a regional tournament, not sure that is of the level to pass
- ) 18:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This appears to be a pretty useless redirect. The target is the vague overview of the entire country, and this term could be used in many different instances, including several which could be official positions of the government.
- ) 12:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Seems to be a textbook case of WP:BIO1E. Zero in-depth coverage about this person outside of the friendship with the swan.
- Reason: Seems to be a textbook case of
- ) 13:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSONG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 01:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: A working casting director. Apparently her bio says that she received a lifetime achievement award from BFI. However, I can't find anything on the BFI site to corroborate that. In fact, I can't find anything on the BFI site that says that such an award exists, unlike AFI, where there is such an award. That being said, even if such an award exists, that is not enough to establish notability.
- ) 03:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable elementary school. Sourcing is all of a local nature which one might expect of any school in the US.
- talk · contribs) 17:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Really? Seems an implausible search term.
- talk · contribs) 17:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not seem to be mentioned in target page.
- ) 15:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show notability outside of the show.
- talk · contribs) 17:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Fan page of a beauty contestant. Not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Current sourcing is mostly non-RS, with a primary source thrown in.
- Reason: Fan page of a beauty contestant. Not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass
- ) 14:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was AfD'd back in 2013, and nothing really has changed since then. While it is part of a historic district, it itself is not on the NRHP. Currently the vast majority of the article is primary sourced, and there is not enough in-depth coverage to pass GNG. Part of several articles which have all be recreated after AfD. I'll be sending them all to AfD, but did not feel bundling was appropriate, since all should be evaluated individually.
- ) 14:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was AfD'd back in 2013, and nothing really has changed since then. While it is part of a historic district, it itself is not on the NRHP. Currently the vast majority of the article is primary sourced, and there is not enough in-depth coverage to pass GNG. Part of several articles which have all be recreated after AfD. I'll be sending them all to AfD, but did not feel bundling was appropriate, since all should be evaluated individually.
- ) 14:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was AfD'd back in 2013, and nothing really has changed since then. While it is part of a historic district, it itself is not on the NRHP. Currently the vast majority of the article is primary sourced, and there is not enough in-depth coverage to pass GNG. Part of several articles all dealing with residence halls at Notre Dame. I'll be sending them to AfD, but did not feel bundling was appropriate, since all should be evaluated individually.
- ) 14:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was AfD'd back in 2013, and nothing really has changed since then. While it is part of a historic district, it itself is not on the NRHP. Currently the vast majority of the article is primary sourced, and there is not enough in-depth coverage to pass GNG. Part of several articles about Notre Dame residence halls. I'll be sending them to AfD, but did not feel bundling was appropriate, since all should be evaluated individually. Should be a redirect to the list page, University of Notre Dame residence halls.
- ) 17:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
- ) 04:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: This place gets lots of mentions, due to its use on Curb Your Enthusiasm, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NCORPDEPTH.
- Reason: This place gets lots of mentions, due to its use on Curb Your Enthusiasm, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass either
- ) 13:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "not a candidate for prodding". COI article, not nearly enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "not a candidate for prodding". COI article, not nearly enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: COI article, written by the software's creator (who did acknowledge the COI on the article's talk page). However, not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG. It gets some mentions, but most of the article is based on primary sourcing.
- Reason: COI article, written by the software's creator (who did acknowledge the COI on the article's talk page). However, not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes
- ) 12:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "Adding more information and references, Ann Road is a major thoroughfare in the Las Vegas Valley with multiple places in its namesake along it." However, I can't find enough in-depth coverage of the street itself to pass WP:GEOROAD.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "Adding more information and references, Ann Road is a major thoroughfare in the Las Vegas Valley with multiple places in its namesake along it." However, I can't find enough in-depth coverage of the street itself to pass
- ) 13:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Local politician. Can't see enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:MUSICBIO.
- Reason: Local politician. Can't see enough in-depth coverage to pass
- talk · contribs) 13:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: An earlier version, which was much more well-sourced, was deleted a few years ago. The same issues that there were then are still present. There is not enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable references to pass WP:MUSICBIO.
- Reason: An earlier version, which was much more well-sourced, was deleted a few years ago. The same issues that there were then are still present. There is not enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable references to pass
- ) 15:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While there is some coverage, there is not enough to meet WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: While there is some coverage, there is not enough to meet
- ) 15:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "deprod; 17C buildings are generally notable, even in countries which do not have good heritage listing; take to AfD". Now, sometimes I have to laugh at myself, as it took me days to realize that 17C referred to 17th century. I was thinking more along the lines of the Indian version of NHRP. And while I agree with the deprodder's rationale, my issue with the article is that the single source does not appear to mention the article's subject at all. So I wasn't sure that this building, as described in the article, even exists. It's been tagged for a month with improvement tags, without any attempt at improvement. Right now, it fails WP:VERIFY. Searches turned up zero coverage.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "deprod; 17C buildings are generally notable, even in countries which do not have good heritage listing; take to AfD". Now, sometimes I have to laugh at myself, as it took me days to realize that 17C referred to 17th century. I was thinking more along the lines of the Indian version of NHRP. And while I agree with the deprodder's rationale, my issue with the article is that the single source does not appear to mention the article's subject at all. So I wasn't sure that this building, as described in the article, even exists. It's been tagged for a month with improvement tags, without any attempt at improvement. Right now, it fails
- ) 18:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without improvement or rationale. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NACADEMIC, and she doesn't appear to meet any of the other criteria.
- Reason: Deprodded without improvement or rationale. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 12:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. I can't see any claim to notability in the article, a parish minister and administrator. Does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. I can't see any claim to notability in the article, a parish minister and administrator. Does not meet
- ) 13:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Semi-professional club which does not meet WP:FOOTYN.
- Reason: Semi-professional club which does not meet
- ) 14:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, they exist, surely, but not notable. Was draftified with the hope that the article would be improved, but only a single, primary source was added.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: With the Fortune nod, thought there would be more about this very accomplished economist. Doesn't really fit into WP:GNG.
- Reason: With the Fortune nod, thought there would be more about this very accomplished economist. Doesn't really fit into
- ) 13:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Typical routine coverage of talented high schooler. Fails WP:NSPORTS.
- Reason: Typical routine coverage of talented high schooler. Fails
- ) 14:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: H.S. prospect. Routine coverage. Fails WP:NSPORTS.
- Reason: H.S. prospect. Routine coverage. Fails
- ) 15:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it." If so, I wish they had been added to the article. Which right now only has 2 press releases, an interview, and a couple of brief mentions. Does not meet WP:NALBUM.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it." If so, I wish they had been added to the article. Which right now only has 2 press releases, an interview, and a couple of brief mentions. Does not meet
- ) 13:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "New sourcing establishes notability", however, not a single source has any in-depth coverage of this report. There is one in-depth article, but it's a reprint from the organization which creates the report. At least one of the sources added doesn't even mention this report, and the others are simple mentions. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth sourcing to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "New sourcing establishes notability", however, not a single source has any in-depth coverage of this report. There is one in-depth article, but it's a reprint from the organization which creates the report. At least one of the sources added doesn't even mention this report, and the others are simple mentions. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth sourcing to show it passes
- ) 13:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Accomplished, but simply not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Accomplished, but simply not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 16:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage in independent sources to pass WP:NACADEMIC.
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage in independent sources to pass
- ) 12:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NALBUM.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 20:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: $150 prize - zero in-depth coverage in searches, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: $150 prize - zero in-depth coverage in searches, fails
- ) 20:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 15:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While this exercise does exist, not enough in-depth coverage for a standalone article. Might be worthwhile to start an article on Kotepally Dam, and then have this included in a section on Activities, or Tourism.
- ) 15:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While this group had several hit songs, none of their albums, including this one, appear to meet either WP:NALBUM.
- Reason: While this group had several hit songs, none of their albums, including this one, appear to meet either
- ) 03:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable college venue. Does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Non-notable college venue. Does not meet
- ) 12:51, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither WP:NCOLLATH.
- Reason: Meets neither
- ) 16:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While this group had several hit songs, none of their albums, including this one, appear to meet either WP:NALBUM.
- Reason: While this group had several hit songs, none of their albums, including this one, appear to meet either
- ) 13:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Another non-notable album by this group, which continues to get recreated from a redirect. Fails WP:NALBUM.
- Reason: Another non-notable album by this group, which continues to get recreated from a redirect. Fails
- ) 16:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
- talk · contribs) 20:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Notability is not inherited.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently only a single primary source. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Currently only a single primary source. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes
- ) 12:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that this doctor, while successful, passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that this doctor, while successful, passes
- ) 13:13, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: There's some blog coverage, but not enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable references to pass WP:NALBUM, was redirected, but the redirection was objected to, without rationale or improvement.
- Reason: There's some blog coverage, but not enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable references to pass
- ) 16:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: High school prospect. Non-notable per WP:NSPORTS.
- Reason: High school prospect. Non-notable per
- ) 16:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: H-index of 10, high citation count under 90. None of his positions appear to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: H-index of 10, high citation count under 90. None of his positions appear to meet
April 2021
- ) 02:45, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Simply does not meet WP:NBASKETBALL.
- Reason: Simply does not meet
- ) 13:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Local church, not enough in-depth sourcing to pass WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Local church, not enough in-depth sourcing to pass
- ) 12:55, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Until and unless he plays for Al-Dhafra, does not meet WP:NFOOTY.
- Reason: Until and unless he plays for Al-Dhafra, does not meet
- ) 14:09, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While he played on the Indonesian national team, that doesn't satisfy WP:GNG.
- Reason: While he played on the Indonesian national team, that doesn't satisfy
- ) 16:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "added more information", which consisted of adding the logo and the date the place began operations. Zero independent sources, and searches did not turn up enough to show that it passes WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "added more information", which consisted of adding the logo and the date the place began operations. Zero independent sources, and searches did not turn up enough to show that it passes
- ) 14:09, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero real world notability. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Zero real world notability. Fails
- ) 16:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Amateur club which does not pass WP:FOOTYN.
- Reason: Amateur club which does not pass
- ) 16:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Amateur team which does not meet WP:FOOTYN.
- Reason: Amateur team which does not meet
- ) 18:00, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: A single reference, and sources turn up virtually nothing else. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: A single reference, and sources turn up virtually nothing else. Fails
- ) 23:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable amateur football club, fails WP:FOOTYN.
- Reason: Non-notable amateur football club, fails
- ) 23:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable amateur club, fails WP:FOOTYN.
- Reason: Non-notable amateur club, fails
- ) 13:20, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show that it passes WP:GNG. There are listings, but no in-depth coverage.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show that it passes
- ) 13:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Mentions, listings, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Mentions, listings, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Amateur club which meets neither WP:FOOTYN.
- Reason: Amateur club which meets neither
- ) 14:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Amateur football club which does not meet either WP:FOOTYN.
- Reason: Amateur football club which does not meet either
- ) 12:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NBAND. Currently sourced by a couple of blurbs from Maximum Rocknroll, the usual Allmusic listing, a primary source and a non-reliable source.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 13:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable politician who fails WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Non-notable politician who fails
- ) 15:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Small town mayor. Meets neither WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Small town mayor. Meets neither
- ) 19:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
- ) 14:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: No references found to indicate this station passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: No references found to indicate this station passes
- ) 14:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Tragic, but clearly a case of WP:BIO1E.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Tragic, but clearly a case of
- ) 14:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 18:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 18:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: While accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 14:10, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Promising high school player, with the type of routine coverage such prospects. Being a McDonald's All-American is not an auto notability category. Does not meet WP:NSPORTS.
- Reason: Promising high school player, with the type of routine coverage such prospects. Being a McDonald's All-American is not an auto notability category. Does not meet
- ) 15:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: If he had played in the Olympics, he'd qualify. However, searches turned up very little on this bobsledder, not enough in-depth to show that they pass WP:GNG. Right now the only two sources are brief mentions.
- Reason: If he had played in the Olympics, he'd qualify. However, searches turned up very little on this bobsledder, not enough in-depth to show that they pass
- ) 14:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show it passes notability criteria. Current sourcing is either from primary sources (either Harvard itself, or the Harvard Gazette), or are simple mentions. In fact, at least 6 of the current sources do not appear to mention the lab at all (#s 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, and 18). Searches turned up much of the same trivial mentions. There is another organization called MetaLab, Ltd., which is indeed notable, and another entity called Metalab, also notable.
- ) 14:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Definitely accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage to show she passes WP:GNG. Searches turned up dozens of mentions of her, like those which are currently in the article, not of which are in-depth.
- Reason: Definitely accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage to show she passes
- ) 14:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to show it passes GNG.
- ) 19:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 13:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The single review consists of a short paragraph at the end of a review of another poetry collection, from a source of dubious reliability. Searches did not turn up enough coverage to show it passes WP:NBOOK.
- Reason: The single review consists of a short paragraph at the end of a review of another poetry collection, from a source of dubious reliability. Searches did not turn up enough coverage to show it passes
- ) 13:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS, another group of protests, no lasting effects.
- Reason: Delete as per
- ) 14:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage about this particular chapter to show notability.
- ) 16:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Small town mayor who does not meet WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Small town mayor who does not meet
- ) 19:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable primary school. Gets the type of local coverage one would expect, but fails WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Non-notable primary school. Gets the type of local coverage one would expect, but fails
- ) 12:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The mentions in the Nəzirli book appear to not be in-depth enough, and the rest are simple mentions. Fails WP:NSOLDIERhas been deprecated, so was not considered.
- Reason: The mentions in the Nəzirli book appear to not be in-depth enough, and the rest are simple mentions. Fails
- ) 13:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass
- ) 15:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Article draftified since in it's current state it doesn't meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Article draftified since in it's current state it doesn't meet
- ) 17:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted through prod last fall. Nothing but listings, with no indepth coverage, does not meet WP:BCAST.
- Reason: Was deleted through prod last fall. Nothing but listings, with no indepth coverage, does not meet
- ) 16:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet
- ) 04:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without a rational rationale, and with zero improvement. An associate professor with a high citation count of 5. Meets neither WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Deprodded without a rational rationale, and with zero improvement. An associate professor with a high citation count of 5. Meets neither
- ) 15:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Has one book out, which got some minor awards, but not enough to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Has one book out, which got some minor awards, but not enough to pass
- ) 20:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not every fatal automotive accident is notable. This is tragic, but as per WP:NOTNEWS, delete.
- Reason: Not every fatal automotive accident is notable. This is tragic, but as per
- ) 17:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The sisters, as a group are notable, but individually there is not enough in-depth coverage on this particular sister for her to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: The sisters, as a group are notable, but individually there is not enough in-depth coverage on this particular sister for her to pass
- ) 20:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not sure that being the first woman of color to cast an electoral ballot in a particular should be a standard for notability. Without that, which probably falls under the WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not sure that being the first woman of color to cast an electoral ballot in a particular should be a standard for notability. Without that, which probably falls under the
- ) 14:44, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Promotional piece about a diplomat who certainly doesn't meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Promotional piece about a diplomat who certainly doesn't meet
May 2021
- ) 17:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Working musician, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:MUSICBIO. Only independent music is self-published. Was redirected as part of an AfD discussion, and that might be the best course of action, but has recently been recreated a couple of times, and the AfD was back in 2013, so I thought a new discussion appropriate.
- Reason: Working musician, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 00:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Unlike his more notable compatriot, WP:NACADEMIC.
- Reason: Unlike his more notable compatriot,
- ) 03:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Competing at the European Championships does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Competing at the European Championships does not meet
- ) 00:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't see how he passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't see how he passes
- ) 15:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The first AfD was closed as no consensus, with the notation, "as many of the "keep" votes lack supporting evidence or a foundation in policy. However, some do speak to the possibility of improvement with sources not presently found in the article. The absence of consensus does not spare this article from being renominated for deletion at a future point if additional reliable sources containing sufficiently in-depth coverage of the subject are not provided." 4 months after the first AfD was opened, and 3 months after it was closed, that sourcing has not been provided.Mccapra's original rationale of "BLP of a social activist who does not seem to have in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. I see passing mentions and quotes from him as a spokesperson but nothing to suggest that he as an individual has attracted the kind of interest that would demonstrate notability. May be too soon." Still holds.
- ) 14:48, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Prod removed without explanation or improvement. Does not meet WP:NBASKET.
- Reason: Prod removed without explanation or improvement. Does not meet
- talk · contribs) 13:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The real world (not in-universe) sourcing is not broad or in-depth enough to show the real world notability of the character. The sourcing is mostly about the actress and her performance, not about the character.
- ) 13:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage of this team award to show that it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage of this team award to show that it passes
- ) 15:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR. Was deprodded with the claim that she has won major awards, however that does not appear to be the case.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 19:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: With only a single significant role, does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: With only a single significant role, does not meet
- ) 14:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was accepted through the AfC process, but can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NPROF.
- Reason: Was accepted through the AfC process, but can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 03:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass either WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass either
- ) 18:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Only a single significant role in a notable production. The second role is of dubious notability.
- ) 12:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The "reviews" are in most instances, one-liners, while others are incredibly short blurbs. There is only a single in-depth review. For over a decade was part of Britney Spears products, until it was split without attribution.
- ) 15:06, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth sourcing from independent sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth sourcing from independent sources to meet
- ) 13:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Gets some mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Was moved to draft, where it was declined before being moved back to mainspace by the article's SPA creator.
- Reason: Gets some mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 15:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither WP:NTENNIS. Had been deleted through prod once before.
- Reason: Meets neither
- ) 16:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: There is at least one Sarah Fine who passes WP:GNGeither.
- Reason: There is at least one Sarah Fine who passes
- ) 02:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: De-prodded without rationale or improvement. Does not meet WP:BCAST.
- Reason: De-prodded without rationale or improvement. Does not meet
- ) 02:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Got some minor coverage regarding her receipt design, but that would come under WP:GNG.
- Reason: Got some minor coverage regarding her receipt design, but that would come under
- ) 02:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Neither source passes WP:VERIFY, was moved to draft in hopes of improvement, moved back without improvement.
- Reason: Neither source passes
- ) 15:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: None of the current sourcing meets WP:GEOLAND, was moved to draft in hopes of improvement, to no avail.
- Reason: None of the current sourcing meets
- ) 13:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Delete as per WP:PERPETRATOR.
- Reason: Delete as per
- ) 16:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 20:31, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The youth versions of the Olympic Games and Amateur Championships do not meet WP:NBOX
- Reason: The youth versions of the Olympic Games and Amateur Championships do not meet
- talk · contribs) 13:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target article.
- ) 13:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 03:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale that he may pass NSCHOLAR, #5, but I'm not seeing it. Very low citation count and h-index, none of his positions appear to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale that he may pass NSCHOLAR, #5, but I'm not seeing it. Very low citation count and h-index, none of his positions appear to pass
- ) 03:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Article created solely to promote the study. Fails WP:GNG, with not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources.
- Reason: Article created solely to promote the study. Fails
- ) 03:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted through prod earlier this month. A working sound engineer, and there are quite a few hits for him. However, I can't find any in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG, and does not appear to meet WP:CREATIVE.
- ) 14:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Just simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show that it passes either WP:ORGDEPTH. Would have redirected, but there doesn't seem to be a good target.
- Reason: Just simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show that it passes either
- ) 19:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: A lot of primary sources, but not enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: A lot of primary sources, but not enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable sources to pass
- ) 19:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage about him from independent, reliable sourcing to show that he meets WP:TOOSOON.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage about him from independent, reliable sourcing to show that he meets
- ) 15:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Some press releases, primary sourcing and brief mentions. Currently, the article does not have a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable source. And google searches found none either. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Some press releases, primary sourcing and brief mentions. Currently, the article does not have a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable source. And google searches found none either. Fails
- ) 02:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes
- ) 12:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Could be a redirect, but an editor insists on recreating.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 13:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 13:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth sourcing to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth sourcing to meet
- ) 16:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 13:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 14:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was moved from AfC after being twice declined. Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to show they meet WP:NOTMEMORIAL.
- Reason: Was moved from AfC after being twice declined. Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to show they meet
- ) 15:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 16:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 21:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Prod removed without rationale or improvement. Working professional. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Prod removed without rationale or improvement. Working professional. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass
June 2021
- ) 00:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not meet WP:NBASKET.
- Reason: Does not meet
- ) 13:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Amateur team which does not meet either WP:GNG.
- Reason: Amateur team which does not meet either
- ) 22:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources. Some primary coverage, but doesn't pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources. Some primary coverage, but doesn't pass
- ) 17:48, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale. A few mentions, some listings, but no significant coverage. Some of the current sourcing does not even mention him. Does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale. A few mentions, some listings, but no significant coverage. Some of the current sourcing does not even mention him. Does not meet
- talk · contribs) 03:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Doesn't meet WP:GNG, and no SNG apply.
- Reason: Doesn't meet
- ) 04:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 12:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified with the hope that the article creator would improve on the sources, but was moved back without improvement. Searches, done in the English version of her name, as well as using Минзиә Биктимер, turned up zero in-depth sourcing. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was draftified with the hope that the article creator would improve on the sources, but was moved back without improvement. Searches, done in the English version of her name, as well as using Минзиә Биктимер, turned up zero in-depth sourcing. Fails
- ) 00:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Local politician who does not meet WP:NPOL. The coverage is what one would expect of a local politician.
- Reason: Local politician who does not meet
- ) 20:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Current sourcing is a dead link (to their own site), and simple mention in an article. Searches turned up zero in-depth sourcing. Fails WP:GNG and ORDDEPTH.
- Reason: Current sourcing is a dead link (to their own site), and simple mention in an article. Searches turned up zero in-depth sourcing. Fails
- ) 13:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 22:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable primary school. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Non-notable primary school. Fails
- ) 11:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Could be a redirect, but does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Could be a redirect, but does not meet
- ) 01:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "...since subject meets WP:NACADEMIC 2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. (Rice Design Alliance Award)". However, that is not one of the awards which would meet that criteria. Absent that, does not meet either WP:NACADEMIC.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "...since subject meets WP:NACADEMIC 2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. (Rice Design Alliance Award)". However, that is not one of the awards which would meet that criteria. Absent that, does not meet either
- ) 13:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Would have redirected, but continues to be recreated. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Would have redirected, but continues to be recreated. Fails
- ) 16:00, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass either WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass either
- ) 17:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Gets some brief mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Gets some brief mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass
- ) 21:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: AfD'd several months ago, rather than reaching consensus for recreating, an editor insists on undoing the consensus of the recent AfD. Same rationale's as original AfD still exist.
- ) 03:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not seeing enough in-depth coverage from secondary sources to meet WP:NACADEMIC.
- Reason: Not seeing enough in-depth coverage from secondary sources to meet
- ) 00:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 19:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Virtually totally primary sourced. Was draftified in the hopes of improvement, and then moved back without improvement. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Virtually totally primary sourced. Was draftified in the hopes of improvement, and then moved back without improvement. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Fails
- ) 00:08, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: If these has legs, which it does not appear to, it might be notable, but as of right now, as per WP:NOTNEWS, delete.
- Reason: If these has legs, which it does not appear to, it might be notable, but as of right now, as per
- ) 02:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable civil servant. Meets neither WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Non-notable civil servant. Meets neither
- ) 00:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Another station which does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another station which does not meet
- ) 16:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Along with their twin, WP:GNG.
- Reason: Along with their twin,
- ) 16:07, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Along with their twin, WP:GNG.
- Reason: Along with their twin,
- ) 18:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was a redirect - local coverage one might expect of a local school. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Was a redirect - local coverage one might expect of a local school. Does not meet
- ) 03:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Type of coverage you'd expect from a failed political candidate, fails WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Type of coverage you'd expect from a failed political candidate, fails
- ) 16:18, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded with the rationale, "WP:BEFORE reveals multiple sources", which indeed the BEFORE did reveal several sources. However, none of them were in-depth enough to show notability. There is not doubt this exists, but this simple DICDEF does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded with the rationale, "WP:BEFORE reveals multiple sources", which indeed the BEFORE did reveal several sources. However, none of them were in-depth enough to show notability. There is not doubt this exists, but this simple DICDEF does not meet
- ) 02:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was moved to draft in hopes of improvement. Moved back without such. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage.
July 2021
- ) 12:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes it would be improved. It was not. Searches did not turn up enough to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes it would be improved. It was not. Searches did not turn up enough to meet
- ) 23:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 23:58, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not meet WP:NALBUM, Punknews.org does not appear to be a reliable source, since it accepts community based input, very similar to Wikipedia. Absent that, and the simply ubiquitous Allmusic blurb, does not meet any of the requirements.
- Reason: Does not meet
- ) 00:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The Allmusic blurb is even more perfunctory than most of their blurbs. It's literally a single sentence by a user, not staff. The Pitchfork review is also by a contributor, not staff, and no way to tell if there is editorial oversight of that. The third review is a dead link, but from a site which does not appear to have editorial oversight. Searches turned up zilch. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: The Allmusic blurb is even more perfunctory than most of their blurbs. It's literally a single sentence by a user, not staff. The Pitchfork review is also by a contributor, not staff, and no way to tell if there is editorial oversight of that. The third review is a dead link, but from a site which does not appear to have editorial oversight. Searches turned up zilch. Fails
- ) 00:36, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable amateur team. Nothing but the local coverage one would expect. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Non-notable amateur team. Nothing but the local coverage one would expect. Fails
- ) 15:43, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While tragic, not enough in-depth coverage about him, outside his death, to show that he meets WP:GNG.
- Reason: While tragic, not enough in-depth coverage about him, outside his death, to show that he meets
- ) 16:03, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Appears to be a case of WP:BIO1E, no in-depth coverage other than that a cheerleader enlisted.
- Reason: Appears to be a case of
- ) 23:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Unfortunately, there is an editor who believes that an AllMusic listing is sufficient to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Unfortunately, there is an editor who believes that an AllMusic listing is sufficient to meet
- ) 23:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Unfortunately, there is an editor who believes that an AllMusic listing is sufficient to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Unfortunately, there is an editor who believes that an AllMusic listing is sufficient to meet
- ) 23:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The single link is dead, but an editor insists on recreating without attempting to improve the article at all, Searches did not turn up enough to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: The single link is dead, but an editor insists on recreating without attempting to improve the article at all, Searches did not turn up enough to meet
- ) 15:14, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was soft deleted as a result of the last AfD, then recreated, and then moved to draft. Was declined at AfC, then moved in anyway. Bottom line is that this is a promotional piece regarding a film which does not meet WP:NFILM.
- Reason: Was soft deleted as a result of the last AfD, then recreated, and then moved to draft. Was declined at AfC, then moved in anyway. Bottom line is that this is a promotional piece regarding a film which does not meet
- ) 12:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Could be a redirect, but an editor insists on recreating without providing referencing.
- Reason: Not enough coverage to pass
- ) 16:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Several mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Several mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass
- ) 19:48, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently sourced with a non-RS review and a short blurb. Hardly the type of coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Currently sourced with a non-RS review and a short blurb. Hardly the type of coverage to pass
- ) 02:31, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet
- ) 17:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Promotional article, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Promotional article, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 00:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 13:28, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Unsourced for years, was turned into a redirect in December for notability concerns. The redirect was taken to RfD (see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 30#Amasa Wright), which resulted in the article being restored without making a decision on notability. 3 of the 4 participants wanted it taken to AfD to decide where it should be added. I can't find any sourcing which actually verifies the claims made in this stub. There was a person by this name with his nephew who purchased some property and then later sold it. But the sourcing I found is unclear where it was located, and if he did subdivide it to "create" the city of Chicago. Definitely could not find enough about him to warrant a standalone article, and without better clarity on what his actual role was, not sure of an appropriate redirect.
- ) 02:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: The Pop Matters "review" is not a very in-depth review, not the type which would satisfy significant coverage. And I'm not sure the Pop Matters qualifies as a reliable source since their reviews are submitted by non-staff members. The Exclaim review is a short paragraph, again, not the type of in-depth coverage needed. Absent those two, there's virtually nothing else found in searches. Fails WP:NALBUM.
- Reason: The Pop Matters "review" is not a very in-depth review, not the type which would satisfy significant coverage. And I'm not sure the Pop Matters qualifies as a reliable source since their reviews are submitted by non-staff members. The Exclaim review is a short paragraph, again, not the type of in-depth coverage needed. Absent those two, there's virtually nothing else found in searches. Fails
- ) 13:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage about her to show she passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage about her to show she passes
- ) 17:17, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 18:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Redirected to the author, which was reverted without rationale or improvement. The current sourcing is about the author, and mentions the book. Not enough in-depth coverage to show notability. Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Redirected to the author, which was reverted without rationale or improvement. The current sourcing is about the author, and mentions the book. Not enough in-depth coverage to show notability. Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes
- ) 03:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources. Current sourcing is comprised of listicles, short blurbs, advertisements, press releases, and primary sourcing. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources. Current sourcing is comprised of listicles, short blurbs, advertisements, press releases, and primary sourcing. Fails
- ) 23:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Could be a redirect, but an editor insists on recreating. The current sourcing is either regurgitated press releases, primary, or non-reliable. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sourcing to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Could be a redirect, but an editor insists on recreating. The current sourcing is either regurgitated press releases, primary, or non-reliable. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sourcing to meet
- ) 19:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Other than simply participating in the 2019 Google Science Fair, not nearly enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Was deprodded with the simple addition of a youtube link.
- Reason: Other than simply participating in the 2019 Google Science Fair, not nearly enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 21:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While certainly accomplished, there is not enough in-depth coverage for him to pass WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: While certainly accomplished, there is not enough in-depth coverage for him to pass
- ) 12:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: There is a company by this name which is notable, WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: There is a company by this name which is notable,
- ) 23:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "already some okay sourcing, perhaps could be improved?" That "okay sourcing" consists of 3, listings, a primary source, and 3 non-reliable sources. Fails WP:NOTMEMORIAL.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "already some okay sourcing, perhaps could be improved?" That "okay sourcing" consists of 3, listings, a primary source, and 3 non-reliable sources. Fails
- ) 13:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Current sourcing consists of primary promotional pieces, articles not about the article's subject, and brief mentions. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage of this model. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Current sourcing consists of primary promotional pieces, articles not about the article's subject, and brief mentions. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage of this model. Fails
- ) 23:06, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Local politician who does not pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Local politician who does not pass
- ) 14:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Well-written article, but almost all primary sourcing. The one independent source appears to be about the same incident, but lists a different flight #KJ-7611, not sure if that is a typo, or an alternate flight #. Regardless, there is not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Well-written article, but almost all primary sourcing. The one independent source appears to be about the same incident, but lists a different flight #KJ-7611, not sure if that is a typo, or an alternate flight #. Regardless, there is not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes
- ) 15:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Autobiography about a working, but not notable, actor. Fails WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Autobiography about a working, but not notable, actor. Fails
- talk · contribs) 16:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but doesn't meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but doesn't meet
- ) 13:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Notable only for being on the reality show. Redirect is being recreated as an article. As this is their only claim to notability, the article should be a redirect.
- ) 19:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: With only a single significant role, WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: With only a single significant role,
- ) 12:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was merged to WP:GNG. Currently, it is sourced by trivial mentions and primary sources.
- Reason: Was merged to
- ) 12:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NMUSIC.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 00:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: It exists, but meets neither WP:NROAD.
- Reason: It exists, but meets neither
- ) 22:14, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not meet WP:GNG, being a member of the Advisory Board of State Administration Council is not automatic grounds for inclusion.
August 2021
- ) 13:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Local store - not enough coverage to pass WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Local store - not enough coverage to pass
- ) 14:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While the revue is itself notable, this troupe is not. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage about this troupe, by itself, to pass WP:GNG. Would redirect, but another editor insists on recreating.
- Reason: While the revue is itself notable, this troupe is not. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage about this troupe, by itself, to pass
- ) 02:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Current sourcing does not come close to meeting WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Current sourcing does not come close to meeting
- ) 02:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted with the rationale, "Decline PROD, several sources already cited", and no improvement. However, the sources are simple blurbs, listings, or mere mentions. Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes WP:NFILM.
- Reason: Was deleted with the rationale, "Decline PROD, several sources already cited", and no improvement. However, the sources are simple blurbs, listings, or mere mentions. Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes
- ) 00:38, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement. Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement. Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 13:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero real-world notability. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Zero real-world notability. Fails
- ) 20:45, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Nothing but local coverage of the local election. Fails WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Nothing but local coverage of the local election. Fails
- ) 20:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted through prod last year, same issues still apply, Routine sports coverage, not enough in-depth to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NCOLLATH.
- ) 16:49, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Could be a redirect, but an editor insists on recreating, with zero real-world notability. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Could be a redirect, but an editor insists on recreating, with zero real-world notability. Fails
- ) 01:15, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Local politician of small town who's death made the papers. Fails WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Local politician of small town who's death made the papers. Fails
- ) 15:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS- no long-lasting effects.
- Reason: Delete as per
- ) 23:53, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "already some okay sourcing, perhaps could be improved?" That "okay sourcing" consists of 3, listings, a primary source, and 3 non-reliable sources. Fails WP:NOTMEMORIAL. The recent AfD was closed as no consensus, but I welcome !voters to read the closing admin's comments. None of the sourcing provided from independent sources is in-depth. The Times obit is a short blurb, along with dozens, if not hundreds of other similar blurbs regarding war dead. And that is the best of the sourcing.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "already some okay sourcing, perhaps could be improved?" That "okay sourcing" consists of 3, listings, a primary source, and 3 non-reliable sources. Fails
- ) 01:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement - Currently sourced by a primary reference, an unreliable source, and two trivial mentions. Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement - Currently sourced by a primary reference, an unreliable source, and two trivial mentions. Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass
- ) 14:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet
- ) 15:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Fails WP:NGRIDIRON.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Fails
- ) 02:56, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without improvement by a wikihound who has been asked to stop, but can't seem to help themselves. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without improvement by a wikihound who has been asked to stop, but can't seem to help themselves. Fails
- ) 22:45, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Academic who meets neither WP:NACADEMIC. Appears a bit promotional as well.
- Reason: Academic who meets neither
- ) 01:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted through prod, and then recreated. Working actor, but with no real significant roles, fails WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Was deleted through prod, and then recreated. Working actor, but with no real significant roles, fails
- ) 16:22, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Local planning authority. Gets the types of mentions you might expect of an organization like this, but not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Local planning authority. Gets the types of mentions you might expect of an organization like this, but not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to meet
- ) 00:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet either WP:NALBUM, aside from the ubiquitous AllMusic listing (similar to a film being listed on imdb.com), there is the listing in discogs, and a review from a non-reliable source (those reviews are provided by members).
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet either
- ) 13:54, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While it exists, it's a local planning authority. Gets the types of mentions you might expect of an organization like this, but not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to meet WP:GNG.
- ) 16:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Not nearly enough coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Not nearly enough coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes
- ) 20:20, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Video director, without enough in-depth sourcing to meet WP:NDIRECTOR.
- Reason: Video director, without enough in-depth sourcing to meet
- ) 15:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Doesn't appear to have any notability outside their connection with the WP:BIO1E.
- Reason: Doesn't appear to have any notability outside their connection with the
- ) 01:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Was tagged for 3 months regarding notability without improvement. Was sent to draft and immediately returned without improvement. Not enough in-depth sourcing from independent sources to meet notability, WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Was tagged for 3 months regarding notability without improvement. Was sent to draft and immediately returned without improvement. Not enough in-depth sourcing from independent sources to meet notability,
- ) 01:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Note, prior AfD's were not about this individual. This particular college athlete meets neither WP:NBASKET.
- Reason: Note, prior AfD's were not about this individual. This particular college athlete meets neither
- ) 02:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 02:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Some mentions in local histories. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Some mentions in local histories. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 02:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not meet WP:GNG, and winning the fourth highest award of the country does not meet any of the SNG's.
- Reason: Does not meet
- ) 01:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth sourcing from independent reliable sources to meet either WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth sourcing from independent reliable sources to meet either
- ) 02:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: There is no automatic notability for supercentenarians. Barring that, does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: There is no automatic notability for supercentenarians. Barring that, does not meet
- ) 02:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:NACADEMICwhich they might meet is the 3rd bullet: "The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor..." However, I am not sure that the American College of Sports Medicine meets the criteria of a major scholarly society.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show they meet
- ) 11:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Cannot find enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Cannot find enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to show it passes
December 2021
- ) 11:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sourcing to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sourcing to show it passes
- ) 15:36, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show it passes
- ) 15:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been tagged without improvement for months. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show they pass GNG or NAUTHOR.
- ) 18:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Current sourcing includes only very brief mentions of this residence. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Was deprodded with the rationale, "Most students, academics, researchers as well as interested parties of the History of native aristocracy and archaeology find this content much useful." Which isn't a valid reason to have an article. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Current sourcing includes only very brief mentions of this residence. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Was deprodded with the rationale, "Most students, academics, researchers as well as interested parties of the History of native aristocracy and archaeology find this content much useful." Which isn't a valid reason to have an article. Fails
- ) 20:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Journeyman actor. Has been deleted twice before. Nothing done of note since last AfD. Fails NACTOR and GNG.
- ) 15:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Only a single significant role, in RejctX. Meets neither GNG or NACTOR.
- ) 02:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not seeing the in-depth coverage about him needed to pass GNG.
- ) 13:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to pass GNG.
- ) 20:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-dept coverage to meet either WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Not enough in-dept coverage to meet either
- ) 11:10, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 02:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: G11 speedy was removed with the rationale, "This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... I'm reading this as not unambiguously promotional, certainly at every version. No objection to AfD testing." This is one of the most obvious advertisements I've seen on Wikipedia. After the lead, the entire piece is simply a product brochure for the products of the company.
- ) 16:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: While there was some coverage of his death, same issues as last AfD still appear.
- ) 18:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Reality show performer. Not enough in-depth coverage outside of the show to show they have any notability outside the production. Should probably be a redirect, but was reverted.
- ) 21:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: There didn't seem to be any changes in his accomplishments in the last two years which would affect notability, but not eligible for speedy, so here we are.
January 2022
- ) 12:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was tagged for improvement for almost half a year, without improvement. Was draftified in an attempt to allow it to be improved. The draftification was objected to. Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was tagged for improvement for almost half a year, without improvement. Was draftified in an attempt to allow it to be improved. The draftification was objected to. Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to pass
- ) 01:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Would have prodded, but already been deleted once through AfD. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Would have prodded, but already been deleted once through AfD. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 13:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable primary school. Fails GNG.
- talk · contribs) 15:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was redirected, then reverted without explanation or improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Was redirected, then reverted without explanation or improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 23:08, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to pass
- ) 10:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently, none of the sourcing shows any in-depth coverage of real world notability. Searches did not turn up any either.
- ) 11:07, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither WP:NBASKETBALL. Bounced from mainspace to draft, where it was declined at AfC, then moved back to mainspace.
- Reason: Meets neither
- ) 14:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Right now, there is only a single in-depth piece on this restaurant from an independent, reliable source. All the rest are either non-reliable (blogs, allears.nets) or from non-independent sources. Searches did not turn up enough other independent in-depth sourcing to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Right now, there is only a single in-depth piece on this restaurant from an independent, reliable source. All the rest are either non-reliable (blogs, allears.nets) or from non-independent sources. Searches did not turn up enough other independent in-depth sourcing to meet
- ) 15:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NBASKETBALL.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 18:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not meet WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Does not meet
- ) 12:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While accomplished, there's not enough in-depth coverage of the doctor to show that they pass WP:SIGCOV. Searches did not turn up any additional sourcing which would put him over the notability bar.
- Reason: While accomplished, there's not enough in-depth coverage of the doctor to show that they pass
- ) 13:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Currently virtually uncited (the single source mentions nothing about the group, or its members). Was draftified to encourage better sourcing, but moved back into mainspace without improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 19:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they meet WP:GNG. And they do not appear to meet any of the SNG's either.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they meet
- ) 19:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not nearly enough in-depth coverage to show it passes either WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Not nearly enough in-depth coverage to show it passes either
- ) 12:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable reality show participant. Keeps getting re-created from redirect. Fails GNG, absolutely no in-depth coverage about this person outside show.
- ) 13:20, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently only sourced by promotional releases, there's a reason for that, could find zero in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources regarding this person.
- ) 18:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Coverage about this player is of the routine variety. Does not meet WP:GRIDIRON, as the Football Reference says he took a snap, but both it and nfl.com say he played zero seconds.
- Reason: Coverage about this player is of the routine variety. Does not meet
- talk · contribs) 21:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: The hits I'm getting on him in searches (and not on the general of the same name), are all by him, not about him. Can't find any in-depth coverage on him to suggest he passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: The hits I'm getting on him in searches (and not on the general of the same name), are all by him, not about him. Can't find any in-depth coverage on him to suggest he passes
- ) 12:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASKET.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 15:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources to meet WP:NPOL, which clearly say they must be elected. Not a cabinet level position (see Cabinet of Nana Akufo-Addo).
- Reason: While accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources to meet
- ) 11:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Deleted through AfD a few years ago, so not eligible for prod. Recently recreated without a single ref from an independent reliable source. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deleted through AfD a few years ago, so not eligible for prod. Recently recreated without a single ref from an independent reliable source. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 13:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While there is some coverage of this individual, this is almost all from a single source. This could be considered a case of WP:BIO1E, but does not meet GNG.
- Reason: While there is some coverage of this individual, this is almost all from a single source. This could be considered a case of
- ) 16:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Delete as per WP:PERP. No notability outside crime.
- Reason: Delete as per
February 2022
- ) 23:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass GNG, and doesn't meet NSPORTS.
- ) 00:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage about this person. Certainly accomplished, but the current sourcing is comprised of mentions, and PR pieces . Meets neither WP:NACADEMIC.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage about this person. Certainly accomplished, but the current sourcing is comprised of mentions, and PR pieces . Meets neither
- ) 15:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: All the current sourcing is either primary or brief mentions. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage, just more mentions. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: All the current sourcing is either primary or brief mentions. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage, just more mentions. Fails
- ) 19:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While there is some coverage, it all appears to be about a Serbian pilot. Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: While there is some coverage, it all appears to be about a Serbian pilot. Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they meet
- ) 12:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While the Hindu article is a nice review of the book, could not find any others. Redirected to author, but ip insists on recreating the page. Not adverse to rescinding nom if someone finds more reviews.
- ) 03:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass
- ) 03:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass
- ) 20:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 23:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass GNG, and doesn't meet NSPORTS.
- ) 23:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero real world notability. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Zero real world notability. Fails
- ) 22:36, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently sourced by a reference which does not reference the work, and a YouTube video. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG. Was deprodded without rationale or improvement.
- Reason: Currently sourced by a reference which does not reference the work, and a YouTube video. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes
- ) 11:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While tragic, not enough in-depth coverage of him to show that he meets WP:BIO1E.
- Reason: While tragic, not enough in-depth coverage of him to show that he meets
- ) 02:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable primary school. Fails WP:GNG. Not every "world record" makes something notable.
- Reason: Non-notable primary school. Fails
- ) 21:17, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently sourced almost entirely by primary sources, or brief mentions. Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Currently sourced almost entirely by primary sources, or brief mentions. Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show it passes
- ) 11:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Unsourced for years. Can't find any in-depth coverage, fails WP:GNG
- Reason: Unsourced for years. Can't find any in-depth coverage, fails
- ) 14:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This appears to be a bit player and stunt double. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: This appears to be a bit player and stunt double. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 19:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Meets neither WP:COLLATH.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Meets neither
- ) 19:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither WP:NPOL. Was deprodded without improvement, with the rationale, "all references are reliable and it is about a high official of the state." However just because it sourced and he is a government official does not meet either GNG or NPOL.
- Reason: Meets neither
- ) 11:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: As a result of 2 recent AfD's, WP:GNG.
- Reason: As a result of 2 recent AfD's,
- ) 11:06, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Coverage is simply routine, not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Coverage is simply routine, not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to pass
- ) 21:25, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Redirect reverted without improvement or rationale. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, just routine. And contrary to some editors, 3 or 4 lines in an article is not in-depth coverage.
- Reason: Redirect reverted without improvement or rationale. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 21:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Promotional article, written by one of the developers. Indeed, it's one of the few articles they've ever touched in 5 years being on WP. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Promotional article, written by one of the developers. Indeed, it's one of the few articles they've ever touched in 5 years being on WP. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage to show that it passes
- ) 11:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been tagged for months regarding notability by WP:GNG.
- Reason: Has been tagged for months regarding notability by
- ) 11:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While tragic, simply not enough in-depth coverage outside of the action in which he was killed, to show he meets WP:GNG.
- Reason: While tragic, simply not enough in-depth coverage outside of the action in which he was killed, to show he meets
- ) 16:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without improvement and a WP:COLLATH.
- Reason: Deprodded without improvement and a
- ) 17:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Small local town council, meets neither WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Small local town council, meets neither
- ) 11:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: An accomplished Indian civil servant, however he meets neither WP:NPOL.
- Reason: An accomplished Indian civil servant, however he meets neither
- ) 16:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Nothing's changed since last AfD. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Nothing's changed since last AfD. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 16:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or substantial improvement. Does not meet WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or substantial improvement. Does not meet
March 2022
- ) 10:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 12:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show they meet
- ) 12:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Might be a case of WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Might be a case of
- ) 13:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Another junior wrestler who does not meet WP:NSPORTS.
- Reason: Another junior wrestler who does not meet
- ) 13:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources to show they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources to show they pass
- ) 17:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes either WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes either
- ) 11:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Cannot find enough in-depth coverage to show that this meets WP:NFILM.
- Reason: Cannot find enough in-depth coverage to show that this meets
- ) 11:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG. Was draftified for improvement, but moved back into mainspace without improvement.
- Reason: Simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass
- ) 12:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Meets neither
- ) 12:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they pass GNG, and they do not meet NACTOR. Indeed, the article had mistated that their prior roles were supporting, when in actuality, they appear to be bit parts. This has since been corrected. Only significant role is in a self-produced project.
- ) 12:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that it meets WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that it meets
- ) 10:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: The coverage is the type of routine coverage which does not pass WP:NSPORTS.
- Reason: The coverage is the type of routine coverage which does not pass
- ) 11:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 12:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show it meets WP:GNG. Was redirected to artist, but editor insists on recreating.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show it meets
- ) 12:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently just sourced by brief mentions and unreliable sources, searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Currently just sourced by brief mentions and unreliable sources, searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 18:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: No in-depth coverage of the character in real-world contest. Has been tagged for improvement for over a decade, and still has the same issues. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: No in-depth coverage of the character in real-world contest. Has been tagged for improvement for over a decade, and still has the same issues. Fails
- ) 11:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Another civil servant who does not meet WP:NPOL. Currently sourced solely with primary sources. Searches did not turn up anything in-depth about them.
- Reason: Another civil servant who does not meet
- ) 15:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Small town mayor, meets neither WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Small town mayor, meets neither
- ) 20:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without valid rationale or improvement. It gets coverage in the local papers, which one would expect, but not enough in-depth coverage to show that it meets WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without valid rationale or improvement. It gets coverage in the local papers, which one would expect, but not enough in-depth coverage to show that it meets
- ) 10:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been tagged for months without improvement. Lots of mentions, but can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes GNG.
- ) 11:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Cannot find enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG. Should be a redirect, but it keeps getting recreated.
- Reason: Cannot find enough in-depth coverage to show they pass
- ) 15:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Totally uncited article (the single citation does not appear to mention the article's subject -- although admittedly that could be a translation issue). In addition, not sure the source is reliable. Regardless, searches did not turn up the necessary in-depth sourcing to show they pass WP:GNG. Was draftified in an attempt to assist the editor's creator, but was simply moved back to mainspace without improvement.
- Reason: Totally uncited article (the single citation does not appear to mention the article's subject -- although admittedly that could be a translation issue). In addition, not sure the source is reliable. Regardless, searches did not turn up the necessary in-depth sourcing to show they pass
- ) 15:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently sourced with a single, unreliable source. Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they pass notability. Would have draftified, but this editor has an issue with draftification, so here we are. Without better sourcing, which I can't find, does not appear to meet GNG.
- ) 18:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Never played MLB, and has been released by Detroit's AA affiliate, so no longer on list.
- ) 18:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I was actually shocked that a search did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes GNG, most occur in a Googles book search, but they are almost all passing mention of the type, "x is a graduate of the IDF Command and Staff College" or "x, former commander of..." or others of the type. I had sent this back to draft a few weeks ago, when it was sourced with a single primary source. It had been tagged for poor sourcing for a month with no improvement. I had hoped that perhaps it was simply a matter of sources being available in Hebrew, but not showing up in English, and that the article's creator would put the time into properly referencing the article. However, they simply moved it back without improvement the same day, and have not improved it since. The current source does not even meet WP:VERIFY.
- Reason: I was actually shocked that a search did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes GNG, most occur in a Googles book search, but they are almost all passing mention of the type, "x is a graduate of the IDF Command and Staff College" or "x, former commander of..." or others of the type. I had sent this back to draft a few weeks ago, when it was sourced with a single primary source. It had been tagged for poor sourcing for a month with no improvement. I had hoped that perhaps it was simply a matter of sources being available in Hebrew, but not showing up in English, and that the article's creator would put the time into properly referencing the article. However, they simply moved it back without improvement the same day, and have not improved it since. The current source does not even meet
- ) 15:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Prod contested without improvement. Small, non-notable primary school which fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Prod contested without improvement. Small, non-notable primary school which fails
- ) 21:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted through prod, then restored through refund. However, can't find enough coverage to show it passes either WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Was deleted through prod, then restored through refund. However, can't find enough coverage to show it passes either
- AfD00:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Redirect reverted without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Redirect reverted without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
August 2022
- ) 11:41, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Awarded two mid-level awards. If WP:NSOLDIERhad not been deprecated has being too vague, would not even meet that. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources. And since the verbiage from the two citations are not referenced, there might be COI issue as well.
- Reason: Awarded two mid-level awards. If
September 2022
- ) 13:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG. Was redirected to the city, and the redirect was reverted without improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes
- ) 17:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent sources about the committee to show it passes GNG. Lots of mentions, but it's a search committee and gets the type of limited coverage you would expect of such an organization, with very little lasting coverage.
- ) 10:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted once through Prod, so ineligible again for that route. Gets some mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass GNG, and the roles they have had do not support NACTOR.
- ) 13:23, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While a working music producer, can't find the in-depth coverage to show they meet GNG.
- ) 15:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage of this individual. Fails GNG.
- ) 12:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted through prod back in 2019 since it met neither NFOOTY or GNG, and nothing has changed since then, other than NFOOTY being deprecated, but even if it was still in existence, they would not meet it. Was sent to Draft in the hopes of improvement, but was immediately moved back without improvement.
- ) 14:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement, comment was that others in the series are notable, but if you look at those articles, they are in just as bad shape as this one. Searches did not turn up anything to show this passes GNG. I think perhaps an overall list article for all the discs in this series might be the way to go.
- ) 21:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted through prod back in 2019 since it met neither NFOOTY or GNG, and nothing has changed since then, other than NFOOTY being deprecated, but even if it was still in existence, they would not meet it. Was sent to Draft in the hopes of improvement, but was immediately moved back without improvement.
- ) 21:31, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither NFOOTY or GNG, and even if NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, they would not meet it. Was sent to Draft in the hopes of improvement, but was immediately moved back without improvement.
- ) 21:33, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither NFOOTY or GNG, and even if NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, they would not meet it. Was sent to Draft in the hopes of improvement, but was immediately moved back without improvement.
- ) 21:33, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither NFOOTY or GNG, and even if NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, they would not meet it. Was sent to Draft in the hopes of improvement, but was immediately moved back without improvement.
- ) 21:33, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither NFOOTY or GNG, and even if NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, they would not meet it. Was sent to Draft in the hopes of improvement, but was immediately moved back without improvement.
- ) 21:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither NFOOTY or GNG, and even if NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, they would not meet it. Was sent to Draft in the hopes of improvement, but was immediately moved back without improvement.
- talk · contribs) 11:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable primary school. Prod removed with addition of single ref which is only a passing mention.
- ) 16:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This was deleted as the result of an AfD, but treated as an expired prod. Less than 2 weeks later it was recreated. Nothing has changed since the AfD. Pinging users who were involved in the first discussion: Jovanmilic97, and GhostOfDanGurney.
- Reason: This was deleted as the result of an AfD, but treated as an expired prod. Less than 2 weeks later it was recreated. Nothing has changed since the AfD. Pinging users who were involved in the first discussion:
- ) 20:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Meets neither NFOOTY or GNG, and even if NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, they would not meet it. Was sent to Draft in the hopes of improvement, but was immediately moved back without improvement.
- ) 18:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without improvement, this appears to be a personal essay, based largely upon a single work. Delete as per WP:SYNTH.
- Reason: Deprodded without improvement, this appears to be a personal essay, based largely upon a single work. Delete as per
October 2022
- ) 10:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Fails WP:GNG. This editor, despite being counseled that footballers need to pass GNG, continues to create these stubs about footballers who, even if WP:NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, wouldn't meet even that low bar.
- Reason: Fails
- ) 10:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Fails WP:GNG. This editor, despite being counseled that footballers need to pass GNG, continues to create these stubs about footballers who, even if WP:NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, wouldn't meet even that low bar.
- Reason: Fails
- ) 10:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Fails WP:GNG. This editor, despite being counseled that footballers need to pass GNG, continues to create these stubs about footballers who, even if WP:NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, wouldn't meet even that low bar.
- Reason: Fails
- ) 10:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Fails WP:GNG. This editor, despite being counseled that footballers need to pass GNG, continues to create these stubs about footballers who, even if WP:NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, wouldn't meet even that low bar.
- Reason: Fails
- ) 12:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was AfD'd back in 2013. Like that prior version, this is full of citations which merely mention the attorney. Many are primary sources. But can't find enough in-depth coverage of them in independent, reliable sources to show that they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was AfD'd back in 2013. Like that prior version, this is full of citations which merely mention the attorney. Many are primary sources. But can't find enough in-depth coverage of them in independent, reliable sources to show that they pass
- ) 14:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement with the comment, "Doesn't need deleting. He is very well known in militaria collecting circles". However searches did not turn up enough coverage to show that this officer meets WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement with the comment, "Doesn't need deleting. He is very well known in militaria collecting circles". However searches did not turn up enough coverage to show that this officer meets
- ) 01:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Unsourced for 5 years. A BEFORE did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet GNG.
- ) 01:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded. A case of WP:BIO1E, outside the tragedy, no notability. Are we going to have an article for every person who dies in every protest?
- Reason: Deprodded. A case of
- ) 13:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Gets a few mentions, but can't find any in-depth coverage to show this passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Gets a few mentions, but can't find any in-depth coverage to show this passes
- ) 12:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Appears to be a non-notable housing development. Fails GNG.
- ) 12:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG - doesn't appear to meet NACTOR.
- ) 20:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While the company gets some local coverage, it does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: While the company gets some local coverage, it does not meet
- ) 21:28, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage of this individual. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage of this individual. Fails
- ) 21:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that he passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that he passes
- ) 21:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Coverage is just routine sports coverage. Does not meet WP:NSPORTS. Was deprodded without comment or improvement. Even if NFOOTY had not been deprecated, they would not meet it.
- Reason: Coverage is just routine sports coverage. Does not meet
- ) 21:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Current sourcing includes some primary sources, some brief mentions, and a semi-in-depth article, although it's mostly an interview. Searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:NACADEMIC.
- Reason: Current sourcing includes some primary sources, some brief mentions, and a semi-in-depth article, although it's mostly an interview. Searches did not turn up enough to pass
- ) 18:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "see WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "see
- ) 14:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: This is a case of WP:BIO1E, outside of the siege of Mariupol, there is no in-depth coverage of this individual. Was redirected to the siege article, but recreated.
- Reason: This is a case of
- ) 23:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find enough in-depth sourcing to pass WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: I can't find enough in-depth sourcing to pass
- ) 12:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted through AfD back in 2019, and nothing has changed since then. Still does not meet GNG or NPOL.
- ) 13:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Same issues from the 2021 AfD still apply. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Same issues from the 2021 AfD still apply. Fails
- ) 15:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- ) 14:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Nothing's changed from the AfD 2 months ago made by Praxidicae. Lots of fluff pieces. Fails GNG.
- ) 11:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was redirected as a result of an AfD a couple of years ago, and nothing has changed since then. Case of WP:BIO1E. No notability outside of the scandal. Should be a redirect to that page, but redirect was challenged.
- ) 17:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
November 2022
- ) 12:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage on this person, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage on this person, fails
- ) 13:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.
- ) 16:09, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet GNG, and with an H index of 11, and no positions which qualify, does not meet NACADEMIC.
- talk · contribs) 12:51, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Okay, this is a very well-sourced, well written article. Unfortunately, it is WP:OR.
- Reason: Okay, this is a very well-sourced, well written article. Unfortunately, it is
- ) 22:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Failed propositions are rarely notable, and nothing about this one indicates anything different.
- ) 12:46, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Simply does not meet either WP:NOTINHERITED. Should be redirected to Rzewuski family, but that is being reverted.
- Reason: Simply does not meet either
- ) 12:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Simply does not meet either WP:NOTINHERITED. Should be redirected to either Rzewuski familyor husband, [[Karol Stanisław Radziwiłł (1734–1790)]], but that is being reverted.
- Reason: Simply does not meet either
- ) 01:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While he barely would qualify under the now deprecated WP:GNG.
- Reason: While he barely would qualify under the now deprecated
- ) 13:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While this is mentioned in the target, this is a pretty generic term, and most likely could be used to point to numerous targets.
- ) 13:49, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in the target.
- ) 13:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target, and I can't imagine someone using this as a search term.
- ) 13:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: There's one decent article, regarding him being a policeman and actor, but the rest are simple mentions. Searches did not turn up enough to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: There's one decent article, regarding him being a policeman and actor, but the rest are simple mentions. Searches did not turn up enough to meet
- ) 13:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Fails WP:NPOL. Contested as an independent candidate but failed to be elected. No clear evidence of notability.
- Reason: Fails
- ) 13:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Gets mentions in articles, but currently, there is not a single in-depth piece of coverage about him from an independent source in the article. Searches did not turn up any either, so he fails WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Gets mentions in articles, but currently, there is not a single in-depth piece of coverage about him from an independent source in the article. Searches did not turn up any either, so he fails
- ) 12:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While certainly accomplished, simply does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: While certainly accomplished, simply does not meet
- ) 14:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Another public servant who, while accomplished, does not have enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another public servant who, while accomplished, does not have enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass
- ) 01:28, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage about this term. Seems to be a bit of WP:SYNTH. Especially since a significant portion of the piece is unsourced. Currently, over half of the references do not even mention the term. Of the remaining, none talk about it in-depth. Moved to draft in the hopes of improvement, but was contested without improvement.
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage about this term. Seems to be a bit of
- ) 13:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without significant improvement. Searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Deprodded without significant improvement. Searches did not turn up enough to pass
- ) 15:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Could be a redirect, but is being contested without improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 15:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Could be a redirect, but is being contested without improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 15:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Could be a redirect, but is being contested without improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 15:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Could be a redirect, but is being contested without improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 15:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Could be a redirect, but is being contested without improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 15:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Could be a redirect, but is being contested without improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 19:57, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Could be a redirect, but is being contested without improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- talk · contribs) 20:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. I can't find any in-depth coverage of this person. The current two sources are a non-reliable website, and a family memoir by one of his descendants.
- ) 14:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was screened at a minor film festival. Zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Many of the current sources do not even mention the film. The only decent coverage is from the East Mojo, however, that site uses a "network of citizen-reporters", so probably doesn't qualify as a reliable source. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage.
- ) 14:51, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: There's not enough in-depth coverage to show that this person passes WP:REALITYSINGER, this could be redirected if a suitable target appears.
- Reason: There's not enough in-depth coverage to show that this person passes
- ) 13:05, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Been tagged for a few weeks without improvement. There's a single in-depth source currently (#2 at the time of nomination), but searches did not turn up any other in-depth coverage. Could be redirected to the city, but that was contested.
- ) 13:26, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: A redirect to the city was reverted without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: A redirect to the city was reverted without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes
- ) 14:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was sent to draft for improvement, then moved back without any improvement. Not a single in-depth reference from a reliable, independent, secondary source. Searches did not turn up any either. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was sent to draft for improvement, then moved back without any improvement. Not a single in-depth reference from a reliable, independent, secondary source. Searches did not turn up any either. Fails
- ) 11:59, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage on this person to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage on this person to pass
- talk · contribs) 17:34, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth sourcing, but might be due to language barrier. Have requested several times through tagging and redirection for it to be improved, but editor refuses to provide enough sourcing to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth sourcing, but might be due to language barrier. Have requested several times through tagging and redirection for it to be improved, but editor refuses to provide enough sourcing to meet
- ) 17:37, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement. Currently it has zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources. And searches turned up a few mentions, but can't find anything in-depth. Was sent to draft for improvement, but returned to mainspace without review.
December 2022
- ) 14:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While there is sourcing to show that there is a place by this name, there is no in-depth coverage. Was sent to draft for improvement, since it has zero current references. I say zero, because the single "reference" is to a map on which this place does not exist. Neither of the two external links mention the town either. Was actually approved at AfC without a single valid reference.
- ) 14:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Like Barenis, which I just sent to AfD, This was sent to draft for improvement, since it has zero current references. I say zero, because the single "reference" is to a map on which this place does not exist. Neither of the two external links mention the town either. Was actually approved at AfC without a single valid reference.
- Reason: Like
- ) 15:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Have attempted tagging and redirecting this article, hoping that it would be improved. Currently, there is not a single in-depth source. Fails GNG.
- ) 15:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Have attempted tagging and redirecting this article, hoping that it would be improved. Currently, there is not a single in-depth source. Fails GNG.
- ) 15:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Have attempted tagging and redirecting this article, hoping that it would be improved. Currently, there is not a single in-depth source. Fails GNG.
- ) 00:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Have attempted tagging and redirecting this article, hoping that it would be improved. Currently, there is not a single in-depth source. Fails GNG.
- ) 02:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "Baram does meet notability guidelines according to WP:NSKATE. She is an ISU Junior Grand Prix Final medalist." However, NSKATE says, in reference to Junior skaters, "Have won a medal at an international senior-level event or the World Junior Figure Skating Championships". In looking at WP:NSKATE. If those two article regarding the World Juniors and Junior Grand Prix are actually duplicate articles, please ping me and I'll speedily close this.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "Baram does meet notability guidelines according to WP:NSKATE. She is an ISU Junior Grand Prix Final medalist." However, NSKATE says, in reference to Junior skaters, "Have won a medal at an international senior-level event or the World Junior Figure Skating Championships". In looking at
- ) 02:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "Baram does meet notability guidelines according to WP:NSKATE. However, like his skating partner, he is an ISU Junior Grand Prix Final medalist." However, NSKATE says, in reference to Junior skaters, "Have won a medal at an international senior-level event or the World Junior Figure Skating Championships". In looking at WP:NSKATE. If those two article regarding the World Juniors and Junior Grand Prix are actually duplicate articles, please ping me and I'll speedily close this.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "Baram does meet notability guidelines according to WP:NSKATE. However, like his skating partner, he is an ISU Junior Grand Prix Final medalist." However, NSKATE says, in reference to Junior skaters, "Have won a medal at an international senior-level event or the World Junior Figure Skating Championships". In looking at
- ) 02:16, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Have attempted tagging and redirecting this article, hoping that it would be improved. Currently, there is not a single in-depth source. Fails GNG.
- ) 14:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: It exists, but couldn't find any in-depth coverage of this organization. The most in-depth source is a press release about the death of the founder. And even that doesn't truly go into depth about the organization. Other than that, there are simply mentions. Fails WP:NORG.
- Reason: It exists, but couldn't find any in-depth coverage of this organization. The most in-depth source is a press release about the death of the founder. And even that doesn't truly go into depth about the organization. Other than that, there are simply mentions. Fails
- ) 11:26, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been draftified hoping for improvement. Was returned to mainspace with same issues, was prodded, then deprodded without improvement. Gets mentions, but is difficult to tell what this is even about: is it a single school? Is it a school district?
- ) 14:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While accomplished, there is not enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass GNG, and his positions, h-Index, and anemic quotation count do not show that he passes WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: While accomplished, there is not enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass GNG, and his positions, h-Index, and anemic quotation count do not show that he passes
- ) 14:28, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While in his specialty he is very accomplished, that does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: While in his specialty he is very accomplished, that does not meet
- ) 12:24, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While very well written and sourced, none of the sources actually discuss the topic of the article. Rather, this WP editor has created an article which is full of WP:GNG, also the SYNTH and OR issues.
- Reason: While very well written and sourced, none of the sources actually discuss the topic of the article. Rather, this WP editor has created an article which is full of
- ) 15:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Have attempted to prompt improvement in the article through tagging and redirection. Would have draftified it, but that seems pointless since the article's creator seems unwilling to put effort into the article. Current sourcing and searches did not turn up anywhere near enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Have attempted to prompt improvement in the article through tagging and redirection. Would have draftified it, but that seems pointless since the article's creator seems unwilling to put effort into the article. Current sourcing and searches did not turn up anywhere near enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 11:50, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass GNG, and with an h-Index of 7, and low citation count, can't see anything else that meets WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass GNG, and with an h-Index of 7, and low citation count, can't see anything else that meets
- ) 20:23, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently has zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches turned up a few brief mentions, but zero in-depth coverage. Had redirected, but was reverted without improvement.
- ) 11:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: As the original AfD said, "Tiktokker BLP with lots of references, but they seem to be mostly churnalism or puff-pieces." Fails GNG.
- ) 11:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted through prod last year, so cannot prod. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass GNG, and does not meet NARTIST.
- ) 12:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Wholly sourced by primary sources. Has been tagged for some time without improvement, was redirected, but that was reverted. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage.
- RfD; Target: Kamal Ahmed (writer, director, producer, musician, comedian) (notified); notified Brantzmyers (talk · contribs) 13:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: created as a result of unwieldy page move - unlikely search term
- ) 15:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Wholly sourced by primary sources and imdb. Has been tagged for some time without improvement, was redirected, but that was reverted. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage.
- ) 18:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Simply not enough coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR. Was deprodded with a note on the talk page that the Jonas Basanavičius Prize is enough to meet NSCHOLAR. Not sure that's accurate.
- Reason: Simply not enough coverage to meet
- ) 11:51, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently sourced only by primary sources and/or brief mentions. Searches did not turn up a single in-depth source about this pilot, was tagged for notability, which was removed with an WP:GNG.
- Reason: Currently sourced only by primary sources and/or brief mentions. Searches did not turn up a single in-depth source about this pilot, was tagged for notability, which was removed with an
- ) 12:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: While accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:NSPORTS.
- Reason: While accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass
- ) 13:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was AfD'd back in 2007, nothing has changed since then, (since he was dead). Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was AfD'd back in 2007, nothing has changed since then, (since he was dead). Fails
- ) 02:33, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: The director's page, which was a suitable redirect target was just deleted. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: The director's page, which was a suitable redirect target was just deleted. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 13:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not meet WP:GNG, currently zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources.
- Reason: Does not meet
- ) 13:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently, zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was draftified with the hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Currently, zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was draftified with the hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 13:37, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to show that it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to show that it passes
- ) 15:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Just a lot of fancruft. Zero in-depth coverage to show any real-world notability. Everything is in-universe.
- ) 12:34, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement. Other than the spurt of coverage when he foiled the bank robbery in 1981, and even that is mostly simple mentions, there is not any in-depth coverage of him in independent, reliable, sources. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement. Other than the spurt of coverage when he foiled the bank robbery in 1981, and even that is mostly simple mentions, there is not any in-depth coverage of him in independent, reliable, sources. Fails
January 2023
- ) 14:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero reliable sources to support the information in the article. Was draftified in an attempt to get the article approved, but an admin continues to re-add uncited information in violation of WP:BURDEN. While this does have a map, that is its sole reference. However, the map does not support any of the information in the stub. The article is about a state highway. The map's legend shows that dark green and light green are the colors for state highways (state highway and new declared state highway, respectively). The first issue arises that there are at least 3 roads on the map in light or dark green which are numbered 10. There is an additional road numbered 10, in a different color green which is not explained in the legend. And here is the crux of the issue, none of the roads begin or end in either Gunna or Bhopal. In addition, the map does not include districts, and neither does it have the information needed to either confirm the length or have a distance measurement. This has been repeated in at least 5 other of these stubs. It would be easier, and more in-line with WP policy to simply redirect these articles to a list article, but that has been objected to.
- Reason: Zero reliable sources to support the information in the article. Was draftified in an attempt to get the article approved, but an admin continues to re-add uncited information in violation of
- ) 14:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero reliable sources to support the information in the article. Was draftified in an attempt to get the article approved, but an admin continues to re-add uncited information in violation of WP:BURDEN. While this does have a map, that is its sole reference. However, the map does not support any of the information in the stub. The article is about a state highway. The map's legend shows that dark green and light green are the colors for state highways (state highway and new declared state highway, respectively). The first issue arises that there are at no roads on the map in light or dark green which are numbered 12. There is a road numbered 12, in a different color green (sort of yellow-green) which is not explained in the legend. But that road, is not identified as a state road. And it does not run along the route described. In addition, the map does not include districts, and neither does it have the information needed to either confirm the length or have a distance measurement. This has been repeated in at least 5 other of these stubs. It would be easier, and more in-line with WP policy to simply redirect these articles to a list article, but that has been objected to.
- ) 14:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero reliable sources to support the information in the article. Was draftified in an attempt to get the article approved, but an admin continues to re-add uncited information in violation of WP:BURDEN. While this does have a map, that is its sole reference. However, the map does not support any of the information in the stub. The article is about a state highway. The map's legend shows that dark green and light green are the colors for state highways (state highway and new declared state highway, respectively). Their does appear to be a 13 on a green road, but it does not run along the route described. In addition, the map does not include districts, and neither does it have the information needed to either confirm the length or have a distance measurement. This has been repeated in at least 5 other of these stubs. It would be easier, and more in-line with WP policy to simply redirect these articles to a list article, but that has been objected to.
- ) 11:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another civil servant who does not pass WP:NPOL.
- Reason: Another civil servant who does not pass
- ) 11:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: There are a ton of folks with this name, and this man appears to potentially be notable, but I can't find any in-depth sourcing about this particular person. Was sent to draft for improvement, but returned without any work being done on the article. Currently fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: There are a ton of folks with this name, and this man appears to potentially be notable, but I can't find any in-depth sourcing about this particular person. Was sent to draft for improvement, but returned without any work being done on the article. Currently fails
- ) 11:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement. An impressive h-Index of 1 and a total of 3 citations and no in-depth coverage certainly certainly meets neither WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement. An impressive h-Index of 1 and a total of 3 citations and no in-depth coverage certainly certainly meets neither
- ) 14:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified by DGG with the hopes that it would be improved. Was not. Currently, zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources. And searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes GNG.
- ) 20:56, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: As in several recent AfD's, like WP:NOTPLOT. Was redirected several times, which is probably the best outcome, but an editor insists on reverting the redirect.
- Reason: As in several recent AfD's, like
- ) 14:11, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to show that he meets WP:GNG. Lots of mentions.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to show that he meets
- ) 14:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth sourcing currently. Was redirected, hoping to have it improved, but was not. Due to the commonality of the name, searches were difficult, but not enough in-depth sourcing to show that it passes notability criteria.
- talk · contribs) 14:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently sourced by mostly primary and unreliable sources. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Currently sourced by mostly primary and unreliable sources. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: As per WP:LASTING".
- Reason: As per
- ) 15:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been redirected, has been draftified, in hopes of improving the sourcing. With no effect. Currently it is sourced by two primary and one unreliable source. Searches only turned up coverage in that same unreliable source.
- ) 15:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While certainly accomplished, I can't find any in-depth sourcing on this business executive. He definitely gets mentioned, but no in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: While certainly accomplished, I can't find any in-depth sourcing on this business executive. He definitely gets mentioned, but no in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 15:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes of improvement, without any. Other than promotional fluff pieces, not enough in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes of improvement, without any. Other than promotional fluff pieces, not enough in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources to pass
- ) 16:59, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Local politician who does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Local politician who does not meet
- ) 17:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Other than the one source from the militantwire.com, which is an unreliable source, zero in-depth coverage to show notability. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Other than the one source from the militantwire.com, which is an unreliable source, zero in-depth coverage to show notability. Fails
- ) 17:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified with the hopes of improvement, but no such luck, simply moved back referencing WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was draftified with the hopes of improvement, but no such luck, simply moved back referencing
- talk · contribs) 12:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: She gets a few mentions, but couldn't find a single source which goes in-depth about this individual.
- ) 13:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Aside from being virtually uncited, Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to show that other than existing, it was notable.
- ) 20:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Just routine coverage, nothing in-depth enough to pass WP:NSPORTS. Was deprodded with the addition of single source of short, routine sports coverage.
- Reason: Just routine coverage, nothing in-depth enough to pass
- ) 13:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage currently in article, or found during searches. Fails WP:GNG. Was redirected, but that was reverted, so now we are here.
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage currently in article, or found during searches. Fails
- ) 15:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified in the hopes of improving sourcing, but was returned to mainspace without improvement. It gets some mentions, but there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show that it meets GNG.
- ) 11:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any. Fails
- ) 11:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any. Fails WP:GNG.
- ) 11:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any. Fails WP:GNG.
- ) 11:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any. Fails WP:GNG.
- ) 11:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any. Fails WP:GNG.
- ) 11:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any. Fails WP:GNG.
- ) 12:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:NACTOR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 12:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace immediately without any. Fails WP:GNG.
- ) 11:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Same issues still exist as first AfD. Currently zero in-depth sources from independent, reliable, secondary sources, and searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Same issues still exist as first AfD. Currently zero in-depth sources from independent, reliable, secondary sources, and searches did not turn up enough to pass
- ) 13:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified in the hopes of improvement, but moved back without any significant changes. Currently, no in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources, and searches did not turn up any.
- ) 11:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without rationale or improvement. While these two teams play each other, there is simply not enough in-depth coverage about any rivalry between the two.
- ) 12:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but I cannot find enough in-depth sourcing to show that they pass WP:GNG. Was draftified in the hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any improvements.
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but I cannot find enough in-depth sourcing to show that they pass
- ) 22:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I had tagged this article for notability concerns earlier today, since all 3 of its refs were primary sources (its own website). The article's creator took umbrage with that tagging and removed the tag. They did add 3 more sources, none of which added to the notability of the subject (1 was yet again to a primary source, and the other two are mere mentions). I tagged it for primary sources, since 4 of the 6 current sources are primary, so that other reviewers would be clued in as to what the issues with the article are. The article's creator has seen fit to remove that tag as well, without any rationale based on policy, or without improving the article. The current sourcing includes those 4 primary sources, and two brief mentions. A BEFORE revealed zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources. It appears to be a non-notable trade magazine. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: I had tagged this article for notability concerns earlier today, since all 3 of its refs were primary sources (its own website). The article's creator took umbrage with that tagging and removed the tag. They did add 3 more sources, none of which added to the notability of the subject (1 was yet again to a primary source, and the other two are mere mentions). I tagged it for primary sources, since 4 of the 6 current sources are primary, so that other reviewers would be clued in as to what the issues with the article are. The article's creator has seen fit to remove that tag as well, without any rationale based on policy, or without improving the article. The current sourcing includes those 4 primary sources, and two brief mentions. A BEFORE revealed zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources. It appears to be a non-notable trade magazine. Fails
- ) 02:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This has been redirected several times. There is zero in-depth coverage of this individual, and zero of the information in the article is verified in the sources, other than the threat to cut communications. According to the current sources. there was an individual named Venkoji who was a clan chief of the Koli, but that, in and of itself, is not notable. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: This has been redirected several times. There is zero in-depth coverage of this individual, and zero of the information in the article is verified in the sources, other than the threat to cut communications. According to the current sources. there was an individual named Venkoji who was a clan chief of the Koli, but that, in and of itself, is not notable. Fails
- ) 02:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that this person passes WP:GNG. Other than the Propublica piece, there is no in-depth coverage.
- Reason: I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that this person passes
- ) 14:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find anything notable about this person outside their arrest and execution. Seems to be a case of WP:PERPalso applies.
- Reason: I can't find anything notable about this person outside their arrest and execution. Seems to be a case of
- ) 12:26, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified with the hopes of improvement, then returned to mainspace without improvements. Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes GNG. Currently sourced with primary and non-reliable sources, and three database entries.
- ) 12:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet
- ) 19:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently has no in-depth coverage, and searches did not turn up any. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Currently has no in-depth coverage, and searches did not turn up any. Fails
- ) 18:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find anything notable about this person outside their arrest and execution. Seems to be a case of WP:PERPalso applies.
- Reason: I can't find anything notable about this person outside their arrest and execution. Seems to be a case of
- ) 13:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find anything notable about this person outside their arrest and execution. Seems to be a case of WP:PERPalso applies.
- Reason: I can't find anything notable about this person outside their arrest and execution. Seems to be a case of
- ) 11:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While accomplished, does not meet either WP:NSCHOLAR. While he did originate a procedure, apparently, all the sourcing for procedure, which will also be at AfD as I did not feel bundling was appropriate, is primary sourcing. Both articles were tagged for a week without improvement, after which I prodded this one, and sent the article about the procedure to draft. This was de-prodded, and the procedure article was returned to mainspace, both without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that either passes GNG.
- Reason: While accomplished, does not meet either
- ) 12:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG. I am sending both this article and the article about the Chinese academic who developed it to AfD as I did not feel bundling was appropriate. All the current sourcing in this article is primary sourcing, although the article about the academic did include a single independent source which goes in-depth about both the procedure and the academic. Both articles were tagged for a week without improvement, after which I sent this article to draft, and prodded the other one. This was returned to mainspace and the other was de-prodded, both without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that either passes GNG.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes
- ) 14:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any changes. Current sourcing does not support claims made in article, and searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any changes. Current sourcing does not support claims made in article, and searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 11:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was sent to draft for improvement, and returned shortly after. It has been expanded slightly, but only to include another database entry sort. Currently does not meet WP:NTENNIS.
- Reason: Was sent to draft for improvement, and returned shortly after. It has been expanded slightly, but only to include another database entry sort. Currently does not meet
- ) 12:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Might be a case of WP:NSPORTS.
- Reason: Might be a case of
- ) 11:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While accomplished, does not meet either WP:NSPORTS. Was redirected as per recent AfDs for Daniel Tioumentsev and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Baram.
- Reason: While accomplished, does not meet either
- ) 12:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Outside of a single incident involving her being stuck in an elevator, which did receive at least a single in-depth coverage, there is no other in-depth coverage about her. Fails WP:GNG, and her government work does not meet any of the SNGs.
- Reason: Outside of a single incident involving her being stuck in an elevator, which did receive at least a single in-depth coverage, there is no other in-depth coverage about her. Fails
- ) 13:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale that they are a fellow of the NY Academy of Medicine, which does not qualify for NSCHOLAR. Not enough in-depth coverage to show she meets WP:GNG, and does not meet any of the SNGs.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale that they are a fellow of the NY Academy of Medicine, which does not qualify for NSCHOLAR. Not enough in-depth coverage to show she meets
- talk · contribs) 17:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was declined at AfC, after which the article's creator moved it directly into mainspace. Was moved back to draft, since it isn't close to meeting GNG currently, but moved back immediately without improvement. Current sourcing has zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches did not turn up anything. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was declined at AfC, after which the article's creator moved it directly into mainspace. Was moved back to draft, since it isn't close to meeting GNG currently, but moved back immediately without improvement. Current sourcing has zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches did not turn up anything. Fails
- ) 17:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet
- ) 11:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough to meet
- ) 22:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero real world notability. Fails as per WP:NOTPLOT.
- Reason: Zero real world notability. Fails as per
February 2023
- ) 01:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was tagged for two weeks for notability, without improvement, after which it was sent to draft for improvement. Then it was objected to being sent to draft, using an WP:VERIFY.
- Reason: Was tagged for two weeks for notability, without improvement, after which it was sent to draft for improvement. Then it was objected to being sent to draft, using an
- ) 10:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Cannot find any in-depth coverage for these scholarships. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Cannot find any in-depth coverage for these scholarships. Fails
- ) 11:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement (although a rationale was provided on the talk page). I agree with the prodder, "Non-notable institute, no significant coverage in independent sources. Cited sources are either promotional or non-reliable." Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement (although a rationale was provided on the talk page). I agree with the prodder, "Non-notable institute, no significant coverage in independent sources. Cited sources are either promotional or non-reliable." Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 18:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement, simply saying that they pass NACADEMIC. However, I'm not seeing how that is. Has been unsourced for years without improvement. While they do get some mentions, can't find the type of in-depth coverage needed to show they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement, simply saying that they pass NACADEMIC. However, I'm not seeing how that is. Has been unsourced for years without improvement. While they do get some mentions, can't find the type of in-depth coverage needed to show they pass
- ) 11:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded that as a member of Zila Panchayat, that confers notability. However, not sure that being a member of that body meets WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded that as a member of Zila Panchayat, that confers notability. However, not sure that being a member of that body meets
- ) 12:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Notability was removed with the rationale, "First school of social work in Israel. One of the premier schools in the country. Center of research. It is notable." But no improvement. Currently has zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable secondary sources. Searches turned up mentions, but no significant in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Notability was removed with the rationale, "First school of social work in Israel. One of the premier schools in the country. Center of research. It is notable." But no improvement. Currently has zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable secondary sources. Searches turned up mentions, but no significant in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 12:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently has zero in-depth sources from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches turned up zero as well. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Currently has zero in-depth sources from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches turned up zero as well. Fails
- ) 13:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Cannot find enough in-depth sources to show that this passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Cannot find enough in-depth sources to show that this passes
- ) 14:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Prod removed without rationale or improvement, outside of some brief mentions of his elevation to a non-notable organization, zero in-depth coverage of this individual. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Prod removed without rationale or improvement, outside of some brief mentions of his elevation to a non-notable organization, zero in-depth coverage of this individual. Fails
- ) 13:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage about him to meet WP:POL, being a small-town mayor and a deputy AG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage about him to meet
- ) 13:32, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Virtually all the coverage of her is about her being his wife, or the relationship between the two, which would not have been covered if it weren't for his stardom. Notability is WP:GNGon her own.
- Reason: Virtually all the coverage of her is about her being his wife, or the relationship between the two, which would not have been covered if it weren't for his stardom. Notability is
- ) 22:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was tagged for notability for a couple of weeks without improvement. Moved to draftspace, but was objected to and moved back to mainspace, again without improvement. They have no awards, charting, touring, and no other notable songs besides the one that she seems to have just been hired to sing. I don't see them meeting WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was tagged for notability for a couple of weeks without improvement. Moved to draftspace, but was objected to and moved back to mainspace, again without improvement. They have no awards, charting, touring, and no other notable songs besides the one that she seems to have just been hired to sing. I don't see them meeting
- ) 11:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage on this person. Current sourcing does not have a single in-depth reference from an independent, secondary, reliable source. In fact, half the sources do not even mention him. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find any in-depth coverage on this person. Current sourcing does not have a single in-depth reference from an independent, secondary, reliable source. In fact, half the sources do not even mention him. Fails
- ) 10:27, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was prodded by WP:BEFOREdid not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar."
- Reason: Was prodded by
- ) 11:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: UPE/COI editing of article which was deleted in 2021. Same issues still exist. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: UPE/COI editing of article which was deleted in 2021. Same issues still exist. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet
- ) 13:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources to pass
- ) 14:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While tragic, no lasting effects, delete as per WP:NOTNEWS.
- Reason: While tragic, no lasting effects, delete as per
- ) 11:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was originally created back in 2016 as a redirect to Ivy League (clothes), which no longer contains a mention of this term. In 2022, it was retargeted to a new section of Neo-Nazism. However, that section's voracity was challenged at Talk:Neo-Nazism/Archive 5#Trads, and was removed with this edit, so no longer is mentioned there either.
- ) 12:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without rationale or improvement. Working film professional, but not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded without rationale or improvement. Working film professional, but not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass
- ) 12:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While certainly accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: While certainly accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 12:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable to show it passes WP:GNG. I redirected to 2016 PDC Pro Tour, but was reverted. I do not believe a merge with that article is appropriate due to DUE concerns, as well as the target also having its own concerns with independent sourcing. This is one of several articles which I'll be sending to AfD, since the article's creator does not see any need for providing independent sourcing, and will be adding them to this nomination momentarily.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable to show it passes
- ) 15:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any. Was sent to AfD where it went through a soft delete. This is pretty much the same article recreated. Fails WP:GNG.
- ) 21:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Virtually the entire article is plot, so WP:NOTPLOTwould apply. There are a couple of short articles in the development section, but only one is really about the character, the other is about the actors cast to play the character. Fails GNG.
- Reason: Virtually the entire article is plot, so
- ) 11:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another one of these darts tournaments which is wholly sourced to primary sources. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage coverage to meet GNG.
- ) 13:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG. Was redirected to the organization, but that was contested.
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass
- ) 22:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was redirected, and then reverted without improvement. Still only brief mentions and unreliable sources. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was redirected, and then reverted without improvement. Still only brief mentions and unreliable sources. Fails
- ) 13:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another case of WP:GNG. Redirect was challenged.
- Reason: Another case of
- ) 13:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show notability, some mentions, but nothing truly in-depth. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show notability, some mentions, but nothing truly in-depth. Fails
- ) 13:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:NACTOR, could be redirected to Uzalo, his only significant role, but that has been contested.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass
- ) 14:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was declined twice at AfC, once by WP:DRAFTOBJECT, not eligible for draftifying again, so we are here.
- Reason: Was declined twice at AfC, once by
- ) 11:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources to show they meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources to show they meet
- ) 12:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While their claim is interesting, can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: While their claim is interesting, can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass
- ) 12:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Had marked this for notability last week, and hoped it would be improved. A single ref was added, which has a very brief mention of the person. There is not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Had marked this for notability last week, and hoped it would be improved. A single ref was added, which has a very brief mention of the person. There is not enough in-depth coverage to meet
March 2023
- ) 15:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: WP:GNG. Was moved to draft in hopes of improvement, but immediately returned to mainspace.
- Reason:
- ) 15:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: WP:GNG. Was moved to draft in hopes of improvement, but immediately returned to mainspace. Coverage is simply routine sports coverage.
- Reason:
- ) 12:59, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Only notability comes out of the corruption charges. Case of WP:BIO1E.
- Reason: Only notability comes out of the corruption charges. Case of
- ) 12:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Article does not have enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show notability. And when I say enough, I mean zero. One is a short blurb from FBC, one is a single line mention, and the other two do not even mention the player. Was tagged, without improvement, then moved to draft. After which it was immediately returned to mainspace without improvement, with the comment, "Article is decent".
- ) 22:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Tragic, but not notable. Fails WP:GNG. Was deprodded without valid rationale or improvement.
- Reason: Tragic, but not notable. Fails
- ) 17:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not appear to meet WP:SIGCOV. Of the six references included, four of them are sports database entries, and the other two are passing mentions. Was draftified in hopes of improvement, but was returned immediately without improvement.
- Reason: Does not appear to meet
- ) 17:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not appear to meet WP:SIGCOV. Of the three references included, all of them are sports database entries. Was draftified in hopes of improvment, but was returned to mainspace without improvement.
- Reason: Does not appear to meet
- ) 17:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not appear to meet WP:SIGCOV. Of the six references included, three of them are sports database entries, one is a passing mention. The other two are books, one of which is available on Google Books, but a search of this player's last name resulted in 0 results. However, the book seems to be simple listings of teams, with no in-depth coverage of players. Was draftified in hopes of improvement, but was returned to mainspace without improvement.
- Reason: Does not appear to meet
- ) 17:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in the target.
- ) 17:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target
- ) 17:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
- ) 18:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target, and does not seem to be a plausible typo.
- ) 12:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Current sourcing includes zero in-depth coverage. Was redirected to WP:GNG.
- Reason: Current sourcing includes zero in-depth coverage. Was redirected to
- ) 12:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Current sourcing includes zero in-depth coverage. Was redirected to WP:GNG.
- Reason: Current sourcing includes zero in-depth coverage. Was redirected to
- ) 13:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Current sourcing includes zero in-depth coverage. while more sources were added, they were simply more of the same db entries and brief mentions. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Current sourcing includes zero in-depth coverage. while more sources were added, they were simply more of the same db entries and brief mentions. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 11:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Clear case of WP:NOTNEWS, absolutely no in-depth coverage at all, just some short promotional blurbs, all relating to the single event. Very similar case to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas and Mary Beth Meyer.
- Reason: Clear case of
- ) 13:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: He gets lots of mentions, but simply not enough in-depth coverage to show he meets WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: He gets lots of mentions, but simply not enough in-depth coverage to show he meets
- ) 13:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR. Was also tagged for COI by Lectonar.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 22:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
- ) 22:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: not mentioned in target
- ) 22:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
- ) 11:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was tagged for notability, then prodded by WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Was tagged for notability, then prodded by
- ) 14:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
- ) 12:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG, was draftified but returned without significant improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass
- ) 15:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources. Fails
- ) 16:32, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not a single in-depth source, fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY.
- Reason: Not a single in-depth source, fails
- ) 14:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement, then after a week with no improvement, was sent to draft in hopes of improving the article, but was immediately returned to mainspace, again, without improvement. Currently it does not have enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet notability. And searches did not turn up enough. See the source assessment table below (not sure why, but in the preview, source #11 does not show up, it is the best of the sourcing, and meets the criteria towards notability. It is for both footnote #11 and #12):{{ source assess table| user=Example | startopen=Yes | src1 = http://odishapostepaper.com/m/93024/5edbc8311fde0| i1 = y | ij1 = | r1 = ? | rj1 = The source has been noted to have reliability issues| s1 = y | sj1 = The source discusses the subject directly and in detail| src2 = https://archive.org/details/dli.ministry.15883| i2 = y| r2 = y | rj2 = | s2 = n | sj2=Only a brief mention in a single line.| src3 = https://gopabandhuacademy.gov.in/sites/default/files/old/CHAPTER-WISE/Cuttack/Cuttack_Chapter_12.pdf| i3 = y | r3 = y | rj3 = | s3 = n | sj3 = Only a brief mention in a single line.| src4 = https://www.india-seminar.com/2022/753/753_SUPRIYA_NAYAK.htm| i4 = y | ij4 = | r4 = n | rj4 = no editorial oversight| s4 = n | sj4 = Just a brief mention | src5 = https://books.google.com/books?id=8UcoEAAAQBAJ&dq=odissi+dance+teacher+%22dayanidhi+das%22&pg=PA212#v=onepage&q=odissi%20dance%20teacher%20%22dayanidhi%20das%22&f=false| i5 = y | ij5 = | r5 = y| rj5 = | s5 = n | sj5 = Just a brief mention on page 212| src6 = hthttps://books.google.com/books?id=mu8lDAAAQBAJ&dq=odissi+dance+teacher+%22dayanidhi+das%22&pg=PA56#v=onepage&q=odissi%20dance%20teacher%20%22dayanidhi%20das%22&f=false| i6 = y | ij6 = | r6 = y| rj6 = | s6 = n | sj6 = Just a brief mention on page 56| src7 = https://narthaki.com/info/articles/art443.html| i7 = y | ij7 = | r7 = n| rj7 = no editorial oversight| s7 = y | sj7 = | src8 = http://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2022/Nov/engpdf/45-47.pdf| i8 = y | ij8 = | r8 = y | rj8 = | s8 = n | sj8 = Just a brief mention on page 47| src9 = https://www.sahapedia.org/brief-history-odissi-dance| i9 = y | ij9 = | r9 = n | rj9 = Another open source like WP| s9 = n | sj9 = Just a brief mention | src10 = https://books.google.com/books?id=b2J6EAAAQBAJ&dq=odissi+dance+teacher+%22dayanidhi+das%22&pg=PT153#v=onepage&q=odissi%20dance%20teacher%20%22dayanidhi%20das%22&f=false| i10 = y | ij10 = | r10 = y | rj10 = | s10 = n | sj10 = Just a brief mention | src11 = https://dokumen.tips/documents/nartanam-founded-by-kuchipudi-kala-kendra-mumbai-now-owned-and-published-by-sahrdaya.html?page=2| i11 = y | ij11 = | r11 = y | rj11 = | s11 = y | sj11 = This is the best source, it is also the 12th footnote }}
- ) 16:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned on target page, does not seem to be a plausible typo.
- ) 10:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Certainly accomplished during his time, but nothing in the article suggests notability, and none of the sources are in-depth about them.
- ) 14:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Clear case of WP:NOTNEWS, no enduring coverage, all of the sourcing was in late 2016 - early 2017, after the Guinness announcement and all relating to the single event. Very similar case to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas and Mary Beth Meyer.
- Reason: Clear case of
- ) 16:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target, appears to have some connection to an editor who moved it the article to this name, then moved it to a different name, creating this redirect.
- ) 16:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable primary school. Does not meet WP:GNG. Could be redirected to the school district, where both schools are mentioned, but that was contested.
- Reason: Non-notable primary school. Does not meet
- ) 12:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Similar to WP:GNG. Will be including 2 others created at the same time. Was redirected, but the redirection was contested.
- Reason: Similar to
- ) 17:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
- ) 12:36, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find any in-depth coverage of this individual. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: I can't find any in-depth coverage of this individual. Fails
- ) 10:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted in 2021, and nothing has changed since then. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Was moved to draft in hopes of improvement, but moved back without improvement.
- Reason: Was deleted in 2021, and nothing has changed since then. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass
- ) 10:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Some mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Some mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass
- ) 10:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: WP:GNG. It currently has zero. Was moved to draft in hopes of improvement, but was moved back without any improvement, simply the adding of non-reliable blog source which was titled by the editor, "In-Depth article about Louardi Badjika".
- Reason:
- ) 11:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and searches did not reveal any.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 11:56, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet
- ) 13:19, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another accomplished civil servant who does not pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another accomplished civil servant who does not pass
- ) 14:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Does not meet
- ) 19:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently, there is not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable secondary source. Even the Rotten Tomatoes" site has zero reviews (and I've actually never seen that before). At least one of the sources, this one, doesn't even mention the film. Was draftified, but returned to mainspace immediately, without any additional in-depth sourcing. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Currently, there is not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable secondary source. Even the Rotten Tomatoes" site has zero reviews (and I've actually never seen that before). At least one of the sources, this one, doesn't even mention the film. Was draftified, but returned to mainspace immediately, without any additional in-depth sourcing. Fails
- ) 10:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage of this road. Was redirected, but reverted without improvement.
- ) 10:11, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage, was redirected, but the redirect was reverted without improvement. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage, was redirected, but the redirect was reverted without improvement. Fails
- ) 10:39, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet notability. Lots of mentions, but no in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet notability. Lots of mentions, but no in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 10:44, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG. Was deprodded, and additional sourcing was added, however, none of that was in-depth either.
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet
- ) 13:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
- ) 10:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not appear to meet WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Of the five references included, 3 of them are sports database entries. Another is an interview, which as a primary source does not go towards notability. And the fifth, while in-depth, is from a source, erft-kurier, which I am not sure qualifies as a reliable source as it seems to be an advertising platform. Was draftified in hopes of improvment, but was returned to mainspace without improvement.
- ) 10:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Sourced mostly by primary sources, there is not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Sourced mostly by primary sources, there is not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 14:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was redirected, since it has an utter lack of independent sourcing, but that was reverted. Would have draftified, but that would have been tantamount to a backdoor deletion since the creator of the article has been banned from editing Darts articles, in part for creating articles like this. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. A redirect was appropriate until perhaps the tournament began to be played, but as with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 PDC Players Championship series, that might not happen.
- Reason: Was redirected, since it has an utter lack of independent sourcing, but that was reverted. Would have draftified, but that would have been tantamount to a backdoor deletion since the creator of the article has been banned from editing Darts articles, in part for creating articles like this. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was redirected, since it has an utter lack of independent sourcing, but that was reverted. Would have draftified, but that would have been tantamount to a backdoor deletion since the creator of the article has been banned from editing Darts articles, in part for creating articles like this. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. A redirect was appropriate until perhaps the tournament began to be played, but as with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 PDC Players Championship series, that might not happen.
- Reason: Was redirected, since it has an utter lack of independent sourcing, but that was reverted. Would have draftified, but that would have been tantamount to a backdoor deletion since the creator of the article has been banned from editing Darts articles, in part for creating articles like this. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 14:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not sure what the connection is of this term with the target article, it's not mentioned there.
- ) 11:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been deleted twice through AfD, the last time in 2017, when they disbanded, and there is nothing new in this version of the article. While the individual wrestlers are notable, the stable is not.
- ) 11:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Case of WP:BIO1E, no notability outside crime.
- Reason: Case of
- ) 11:50, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Prominent businessman, but the sourcing does not show that they meet WP:GNG. Was sent to draft for improvement, but returned immediately without improvement. Similar to Peter Baxendell, who will also be nominated for deletion.
- Reason: Prominent businessman, but the sourcing does not show that they meet
- ) 11:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Prominent businessman, but the sourcing does not show that they meet WP:GNG. Was sent to draft for improvement, but returned immediately without improvement. Similar to Frederick Stephens (businessman), who will also be nominated for deletion.
- Reason: Prominent businessman, but the sourcing does not show that they meet
- ) 12:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While the misdeed (not sure it's a crime, since there were no criminal penalties) and civil penalty were noteworthy, this individual does not have enough in-depth coverage about the person themselves, outside the event, to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: While the misdeed (not sure it's a crime, since there were no criminal penalties) and civil penalty were noteworthy, this individual does not have enough in-depth coverage about the person themselves, outside the event, to meet
- ) 15:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Outside of the crime, zero notability. Was redirected to WP:BIO1Ewould also apply.
- Reason: Outside of the crime, zero notability. Was redirected to
- ) 10:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted through prod, and restored through prod objection. However, still a non-notable primary school.
- ) 10:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been tagged for months for improvement without any. Currently there is a single decent source from an independent, reliable, secondary reference (the Adenblatt article). Was draftified, and returned to mainspace, again without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Has been tagged for months for improvement without any. Currently there is a single decent source from an independent, reliable, secondary reference (the Adenblatt article). Was draftified, and returned to mainspace, again without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 10:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been tagged for months for improvement without any. Currently there is not a single decent source from an independent, reliable, secondary reference. Was draftified, and returned to mainspace, again without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Has been tagged for months for improvement without any. Currently there is not a single decent source from an independent, reliable, secondary reference. Was draftified, and returned to mainspace, again without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 11:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: She had her 15 minutes. A clear case of WP:BIO1E, no in-depth coverage other than fluff pieces.
- Reason: She had her 15 minutes. A clear case of
- ) 11:31, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Deputy UN Secretary's don't have automatic notability. With an h-Index of 9, and no qualifying academic positions, he doesn't meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deputy UN Secretary's don't have automatic notability. With an h-Index of 9, and no qualifying academic positions, he doesn't meet
- ) 11:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Folks sometimes confuse existence with notability. Was draftified, and returned to mainspace without any additional in-depth sourcing. Current sources do nothing but mention the organization. Or are primary. Or are unreliable. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Folks sometimes confuse existence with notability. Was draftified, and returned to mainspace without any additional in-depth sourcing. Current sources do nothing but mention the organization. Or are primary. Or are unreliable. Fails
- talk · contribs) 12:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: With an h-Index of 10, a high citation count of 38, and no qualifying positions, does not meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: With an h-Index of 10, a high citation count of 38, and no qualifying positions, does not meet
- ) 15:03, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target, not sure of what the connection is.
- ) 10:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another of these WP:BIO1Earticles about folks only notable for a single event. Absent their arrest, zero in-depth coverage.
- Reason: Another of these
- ) 10:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes of improvement, but no improvements were made and it was moved back into mainspace. Current sourcing includes a single in-depth article on the company, (this one, although I'm not sure how reliable a source it is), with the rest being ads, non-reliable pay sites and brief mentions. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes of improvement, but no improvements were made and it was moved back into mainspace. Current sourcing includes a single in-depth article on the company, (this one, although I'm not sure how reliable a source it is), with the rest being ads, non-reliable pay sites and brief mentions. Fails
- ) 14:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was sent to draft, but returned without improvement. They get lots of mentions, but nothing in-depth enough from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was sent to draft, but returned without improvement. They get lots of mentions, but nothing in-depth enough from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet
- ) 11:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass
- ) 14:39, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Current sourcing does not pass WP:GNG, has been redirected but reverted without improvement several times, was moved to draft, and returned without improvement, and so we are here.
- Reason: Current sourcing does not pass
- ) 18:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not sure how this relates to the song. Perhaps it's a lyric? But if so, it's not mentioned in the article.
- ) 10:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero real-world notability has been established. Delete as per List of supporting Harry Potter characters#Gellert Grindelwald. The current sourcing has zero in-depth coverage of the character. The character development section has 3 refs, 1 of which does not mention the character, the other 2 are very brief mentions. The critical response is all about the actor's portrayal, not the character. Would have restored redirect, but recent discussions at ANI leave no choice but to send this to AfD, since the redirect was challenged.
- Reason: Zero real-world notability has been established. Delete as per
- ) 10:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Zero in-depth coverage of the character. Would have restored the redirect, but recent discussions at ANI have left AfD as the only option since the redirect was contested.
- Reason: Delete as per
- ) 11:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was a redirect to a minor league list, but was split off when he was released. Fails WP:GNG, nothing more than routine sports coverage.
- Reason: Was a redirect to a minor league list, but was split off when he was released. Fails
- ) 11:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect - zero real world notability. Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Would have restored redirect, but recent ANI discussions have taken that option away, so now we are here.
- Reason: Another contested redirect - zero real world notability. Delete as per
- ) 11:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was redirect to Zhu Shizhen#Family tree, where this could be included, there is not enough in-depth coverage of this family tree to support a standalone article. Would have restored the redirect, but since it was contested, recent discussions at ANI have that no longer being an option.
- ) 11:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was AfD'd last year, and still no indication this film meets WP:GNG. Additionally, there is an existing draft, which should have been worked on and submitted. Would have restored the redirect, but recent discussions at ANI no longer leave that option, since the redirect was contested.
- Reason: Was AfD'd last year, and still no indication this film meets
- ) 11:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another reality tv bio where the only notability is due to the program. Similar to a spate of Survivor contestant articles recently. Outside her reality star coverage, does not meet WP:GNG. Would have restored redirect, but that is no longer an option due to recent discussions at ANI, since it was contested.
- Reason: Another reality tv bio where the only notability is due to the program. Similar to a spate of Survivor contestant articles recently. Outside her reality star coverage, does not meet
- ) 11:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: WP:GNG.
- Reason:
- ) 12:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was a redirect to a minor league list, but was split off when he was released. Fails WP:GNG, nothing more than routine sports coverage.
- Reason: Was a redirect to a minor league list, but was split off when he was released. Fails
- ) 12:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Nothing but routine sports coverage. Meets neither WP:NCOLLATH.
- Reason: Nothing but routine sports coverage. Meets neither
- ) 12:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - nothing in article to show it meets WP:GEOLAND. Would have restored the redirect, but that is no longer an option.
- Reason: Contested redirect - nothing in article to show it meets
- ) 12:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Wholly unsourced, would have restored redirect, however, due to recent discussions at ANI, that is no longer an option. Fails WP:GNGcurrently.
- Reason: Wholly unsourced, would have restored redirect, however, due to recent discussions at ANI, that is no longer an option. Fails
- ) 12:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NPOL. Would have restored the redirect, but that was contested, and due to discussions at ANI, that is no longer an option.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 12:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested drafitification. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested drafitification. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet
- ) 13:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While well-sourced, those sources do not establish notability. Would have redirected to the director, but the redirect was reverted, so as per recent discussions at ANI, AfD is the only option. Fails WP:GNG. See the table below:{{ source assess table| user=Example | startopen=Yes | src1 = https://cphdox.dk/film/feminism-wtf/| i1 = N | ij1 = | r1 = y | rj1 = The source is from a festival which ran the film| s1 = n | sj1 = The source is a short blurb about the film| src2 = https://www.filmfonds-wien.at/films/feminism-wtf/theater| i2 = y| r2 = y | rj2 = | s2 = n | sj2 = simple db entry| src3 = hhttps://www.crew-united.com/en/Feminism-WTF__257660.html| i3 = y | r3 = y | rj3 = | s3 = n | sj3 = another db entry| src4 = https://www.meinbezirk.at/baden/c-freizeit/katharina-mueckstein-zeigt-neuesten-film-in-wien_a5914552| i4 = y| ij4 = | r4 = ? | rj4 = Can't find editorial policy| s4 = n | sj4 = Brief mention| src5 = hhttps://www.ots.at/presseaussendung/OTS_20181129_OTS0072/23-millionen-fuer-zehn-neue-kinostoffe| i5 = y | ij5 = | r5 = y| rj5 = | s5 = n | sj5 = Brief mention| src6 = https://cineuropa.org/en/newsdetail/364334/| i6 = y| ij6 = | r6 = y| rj6 = | s6 = n| sj6 = Brief mention| src7 = https://cineuropa.org/fr/interview/364880/| i7 = y| ij7 = | r7 = y| rj7 = | s7 = n | sj7 = Brief mention| src8 = https://stadtkinowien.at/verleih/feminism-wtf/| i8 = n | ij8 = The institution was publicizing the screening of the film| r8 = n| rj8 = No editorial oversight| s8 = y | sj8 = The article discusses the subject directly and in detail| src9 = hhttps://web.archive.org/web/20221223132224/https://filmstandort-austria.at/en/movie/feminism-wtf| i9 = n | ij9 = The institute funded the film| r9 = y| rj9 = | s9 = n | sj9 = Short blurb on film| src10 = https://fm4.orf.at/stories/3029820/| i10 = y| ij10 = | r10 = y| rj10 = | s10 = n| sj10 = Brief mention}}There are two more refs (the table only goes to 10). One from FISA, which is not independent, and then a YouTube video, which is non-reliable.
- Reason: While well-sourced, those sources do not establish notability. Would have redirected to the director, but the redirect was reverted, so as per recent discussions at ANI, AfD is the only option. Fails
- ) 13:51, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Due to recent discussions at ANI, AfD is the only option left. Current sourcing has a total of zero in-depth coverage. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Due to recent discussions at ANI, AfD is the only option left. Current sourcing has a total of zero in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 13:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. Would have redirected, but it was contested, so only option now is AfD.
- Reason: Simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet
- ) 14:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This appears to be a case of WP:NOTNEWS, there little likelihood of any sustained coverage.
- Reason: This appears to be a case of
- ) 14:17, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. As per WP:NOTESSAY, noted by both myself and Fiachra10003. Was originally redirected by Galobtter, but reverted. As per recent discussions at ANI, only alternative now is AfD.
- Reason: Another contested redirect. As per
- ) 14:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Zero independent sourcing. Should probably be drafted or redirected until appropriate sourcing is added, but that's no longer an option. Currently fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Zero independent sourcing. Should probably be drafted or redirected until appropriate sourcing is added, but that's no longer an option. Currently fails
- ) 14:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested prod. Zero independent coverage, a single source from the tournament itself. Redirecting or draftifying is no longer an option.
- ) 15:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified once, and recreated in mainspace. The only option left is AfD. WP:NFOOTYis no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. And this article does not.
- Reason: Was draftified once, and recreated in mainspace. The only option left is AfD.
- ) 17:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Yes, it does exist as a term. But do we really need this on WP?
- ) 00:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero independent coverage. Was redirected, as it might have some notability in the future, but the redirect was challenged, so as per recent discussions at ANI, the only alternative is AfD. Currently fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Zero independent coverage. Was redirected, as it might have some notability in the future, but the redirect was challenged, so as per recent discussions at ANI, the only alternative is AfD. Currently fails
- ) 00:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: The first reference is nice and in-depth, but the other two are simple mentions. Was redirected in order to attempt to get better sourcing, but was reverted without improvement. Since it currently does not meet either WP:GNG, and per recent ANI discussions, the only alternative is AfD.
- Reason: The first reference is nice and in-depth, but the other two are simple mentions. Was redirected in order to attempt to get better sourcing, but was reverted without improvement. Since it currently does not meet either
- ) 00:59, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth sourcing to show notability. No indication it meets WP:GNG, so as per recent discussions at ANI, the only alternative is AfD.
- Reason: Zero in-depth sourcing to show notability. No indication it meets
- ) 10:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero real-world notability. Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Would have redirected, but that is no longer an option since the redirect was challenged.
- Reason: Zero real-world notability. Delete as per
- ) 10:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Right now there are zero independent, reliable, secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG. Would have restored the redirect, but that's no longer an option.
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Right now there are zero independent, reliable, secondary sources. Fails
- ) 10:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect - zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show notability. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect - zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show notability. Fails
- ) 11:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: WP:GNG.
- Reason:
- ) 11:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: It exists. But the article is currently sourced with brief mentions and unreliable sources. Sources did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: It exists. But the article is currently sourced with brief mentions and unreliable sources. Sources did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 11:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect. Zero independent sources, but redirecting is no longer an option. Currently fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect. Zero independent sources, but redirecting is no longer an option. Currently fails
- ) 14:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect - not enough in-depth sourcing to show it meets WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect - not enough in-depth sourcing to show it meets
- ) 14:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not sure how this relates to the target, but it is not mentioned there.
- ) 10:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Restored prod. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Restored prod. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 10:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested prod. Fails WP:GNG- not enough in-depth coverage about this non-secondary school to show notability.
- Reason: Contested prod. Fails
- ) 10:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Since WP:NFOOTYis no longer a valid SNG, GNG must be met. This doesn't come close. Was draftified for improvement, but returned without any improvement.
- Reason: Since
- ) 11:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Since WP:NFOOTYis no longer a valid SNG, GNG must be met. This doesn't come close. Was draftified for improvement, but returned without any improvement.
- Reason: Since
- ) 11:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Since WP:NFOOTYis no longer a valid SNG, GNG must be met. This doesn't come close. Was draftified for improvement, but returned without any improvement.
- Reason: Since
- ) 11:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Since WP:NFOOTYis no longer a valid SNG, GNG must be met. This doesn't come close. Was draftified for improvement, but returned without any improvement.
- Reason: Since
- ) 11:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Since WP:NFOOTYis no longer a valid SNG, GNG must be met. This doesn't come close. Was draftified for improvement, but returned without any improvement.
- Reason: Since
- ) 11:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Since WP:NFOOTYis no longer a valid SNG, GNG must be met. This doesn't come close. Was draftified for improvement, but returned without any improvement.
- Reason: Since
- ) 11:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Since WP:NFOOTYis no longer a valid SNG, GNG must be met. This doesn't come close. Was draftified for improvement, but returned without any improvement.
- Reason: Since
- ) 11:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Since WP:NFOOTYis no longer a valid SNG, GNG must be met. This doesn't come close. Was draftified for improvement, but returned without any improvement.
- Reason: Since
- ) 11:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect. Zero real-world notability, delete as per WP:NOTPLOT.
- Reason: Contested redirect. Zero real-world notability, delete as per
- ) 12:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - zero in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect - zero in-depth coverage to show it passes
- ) 12:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - zero sourcing.
- ) 12:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - currently only source is the schedule announcement. Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it is notable. Probably should be a redirect or draftified, but that is no longer an option, since the redirect was contested.
- ) 12:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Absent the coverage on his crime, there is no in-depth coverage about this person. Case of WP:BIO1E.
- Reason: Absent the coverage on his crime, there is no in-depth coverage about this person. Case of
- ) 17:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another ridiculous reversal of a redirect, with zero in-depth coverage from independent sources. Should have remained a redirect until it could be properly sourced, but since it's been challenged, we are here. Currently fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another ridiculous reversal of a redirect, with zero in-depth coverage from independent sources. Should have remained a redirect until it could be properly sourced, but since it's been challenged, we are here. Currently fails
- ) 19:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Tagged it for notability, hoping that it might be improved, but the tag was removed without improvement. The refs in the development section are either primary, or short blurbs, with no in-depth coverage of the character development. In the reception section there 8 new refs. The first is a brief mention of the character, and is about why the actor left the show. The second is an awards show announcement - now I can't access it, but awards shows are about the actor, not the character. The third is a one-line mention. Likewise, the fourth is also a single line mention. The fifth, actually mentions him several times, but it is a plot synopsis. The same for numbers six and seven. Number eight, again talks about the character, but again is plot synopsis. There are 4 other refs in the section, which were used earlier in the article, but none of them are in-depth about the character. On the whole, there is not a single in-depth source about the real-world notability of the character, all of it is in-universe. As per WP:NOTPLOT, this does not meet notability criteria.
- Reason: Tagged it for notability, hoping that it might be improved, but the tag was removed without improvement. The refs in the development section are either primary, or short blurbs, with no in-depth coverage of the character development. In the reception section there 8 new refs. The first is a brief mention of the character, and is about why the actor left the show. The second is an awards show announcement - now I can't access it, but awards shows are about the actor, not the character. The third is a one-line mention. Likewise, the fourth is also a single line mention. The fifth, actually mentions him several times, but it is a plot synopsis. The same for numbers six and seven. Number eight, again talks about the character, but again is plot synopsis. There are 4 other refs in the section, which were used earlier in the article, but none of them are in-depth about the character. On the whole, there is not a single in-depth source about the real-world notability of the character, all of it is in-universe. As per
- ) 08:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested prod. Zero in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources. Current sourcing is only a government publication and a database. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested prod. Zero in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources. Current sourcing is only a government publication and a database. Fails
- ) 09:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - neither of the sources mentions the subject (the second mentions a dialect by this name (as s synonym for the Duhlian dialect), but neither talk about an ethnic group by this name. Normally I would restore the redirect, but that is no longer an option, so to AfD we come.
- ) 09:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draftification. Zero in-depth coverage about this individual so doesn't meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Contested draftification. Zero in-depth coverage about this individual so doesn't meet
- ) 09:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draftification. Current sourcing is 3 routine sports coverage and a primary source. Should be in draft for development, but that was contested, so we are here.
- ) 09:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Redirect was challenged as a "controversial redirect", when the article is solely sourced by 2 database entries. Fails WP:GNGas written, should have remained a redirect or drafted so it might be developed, but that's not longer an option.
- Reason: Redirect was challenged as a "controversial redirect", when the article is solely sourced by 2 database entries. Fails
- ) 09:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Redirect was challenged as a "controversial redirect", when the article is solely sourced by 2 database entries. Fails WP:NSEASONS.
- Reason: Redirect was challenged as a "controversial redirect", when the article is solely sourced by 2 database entries. Fails
- ) 09:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR. Pretty promotional article, so much so that I might suspect some UPE/COI.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 10:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - no improvement since redirected, zero in-depth coverage currently in article.
- ) 10:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet either WP:VERIFY.
- Reason: Contested redirect. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet either
- ) 11:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested as a "controversial redirect", when only has a single independent source. Currently fails WP:GNGand should either be redirected or draftified in its current state, but since it was contested, we are here.
- Reason: Another contested as a "controversial redirect", when only has a single independent source. Currently fails
- ) 11:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS. Absent the coverage of the 2020 Grammies, there is no lasting coverage of this outfit.
- Reason: Delete as per
- ) 23:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect - with zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Currently fails WP:NTOUR.
- Reason: Another contested redirect - with zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Currently fails
- ) 10:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect of a completely unsourced article.
- ) 12:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Wholly unsourced.
- ) 12:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draftification. Was draftified explaining that NFOOTY has been deprecated and they need to meet GNG. Was returned to mainspace without improvement, with the comment, "Absolutely reasonable stub", ignoring the notability criteria. Refs consist of two database entry and a primary source. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested draftification. Was draftified explaining that NFOOTY has been deprecated and they need to meet GNG. Was returned to mainspace without improvement, with the comment, "Absolutely reasonable stub", ignoring the notability criteria. Refs consist of two database entry and a primary source. Fails
- ) 13:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deleted last year through AfD, but is not eligible for G4 (see WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deleted last year through AfD, but is not eligible for G4 (see
- AfD17:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect - does not pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect - does not pass
- ) 09:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: With the current sources, which do not have enough information to pass WP:VERIFY, difficult to ascertain the amount of coverage. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show notability.
- Reason: With the current sources, which do not have enough information to pass
- ) 13:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - single source is primary. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect - single source is primary. Fails
- ) 16:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not sure what the connection is between this phrase and the target, since it is not mentioned there.
- ) 20:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another draft objection. Thought he might be notable, as the one obit is of nice length and from a secondary source. The other 3 sources consist of a primary source and 2 database entries, so doesn't come close to meeting WP:GNG. As I said, was sent to draft, but returned to mainspace without improvement.
- Reason: Another draft objection. Thought he might be notable, as the one obit is of nice length and from a secondary source. The other 3 sources consist of a primary source and 2 database entries, so doesn't come close to meeting
April 2023
- ) 11:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Redirected by WP:VERIFY. And currently fails notability criteria.
- Reason: Redirected by
- ) 11:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draftification by an event coordinator. There is a single reliable source. Fails WP:GNGas written.
- Reason: Contested draftification by an event coordinator. There is a single reliable source. Fails
- ) 11:39, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect. Single in-depth source from an independent reference. And I'm not sure if that is reliable, as I can't find any information about the publisher, Jeremy Mills Publishing, other than they seem to specialize in subjects around fire and fire-fighting related issues. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect. Single in-depth source from an independent reference. And I'm not sure if that is reliable, as I can't find any information about the publisher, Jeremy Mills Publishing, other than they seem to specialize in subjects around fire and fire-fighting related issues. Fails
- ) 12:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect. Zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Fails WP:NTOURS.
- Reason: Contested redirect. Zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Fails
- ) 12:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect. Simply listing books, without giving enough information to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect. Simply listing books, without giving enough information to meet
- ) 12:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: A working actor, his most significant role was on General Hospital, but I'm not sure how significant that role was. Other than that, no other roles which are significant, so fails WP:GNG. The mentions he gets all have to do with his more famous daughter, Peyton, and notability is not inherited.
- Reason: A working actor, his most significant role was on General Hospital, but I'm not sure how significant that role was. Other than that, no other roles which are significant, so fails
- ) 12:39, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Not enough in-depth coverage about a vanity company to meet WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Not enough in-depth coverage about a vanity company to meet
- ) 12:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect without improvement. Currently, not enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:BURDEN.
- Reason: Another contested redirect without improvement. Currently, not enough in-depth coverage to show they meet
- ) 12:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified due to UPE/COI concerns. Moved to mainspace by inexperienced editor. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was draftified due to UPE/COI concerns. Moved to mainspace by inexperienced editor. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 12:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect - zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources.
- talk · contribs) 12:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: No indication of any real-world notability. Everything is in-universe. Fails as per WP:GNG. Contested draft.
- Reason: No indication of any real-world notability. Everything is in-universe. Fails as per
- ) 13:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - zero in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect - zero in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 13:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: With an h-Index of 9, and no positions that qualify, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: With an h-Index of 9, and no positions that qualify, fails
- ) 13:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect woefully undersourced. Should be redirected or draftified until enough sourcing is provided, but that's no longer an option, so we are here. Currently fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect woefully undersourced. Should be redirected or draftified until enough sourcing is provided, but that's no longer an option, so we are here. Currently fails
- ) 13:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - not nearly enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect - not nearly enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 13:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect. Zero in-depth sources from independent, reliable refs. Currently fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect. Zero in-depth sources from independent, reliable refs. Currently fails
- talk · contribs) 13:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified, and was improved before returning to mainspace. Unfortunately, there's not a single in-depth piece about this footballer from an independent, reliable, secondary source. Still fails WP:GNG. There are several local articles which mention him, but all but one are not in-depth, and all are routine sports coverage.
- Reason: Was draftified, and was improved before returning to mainspace. Unfortunately, there's not a single in-depth piece about this footballer from an independent, reliable, secondary source. Still fails
- ) 13:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not eligible for G4, so we're back here. I'm just going to quote WP:ROUTINE. Much coverage is made of her passing a civil service exam, although I have no way of knowing why that would be notable; even those who pass the world's most difficult exam don't all merit articles here."
- Reason: Not eligible for G4, so we're back here. I'm just going to quote
- ) 13:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect. Simply listing books, without giving enough information to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect. Simply listing books, without giving enough information to meet
- ) 16:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another ridiculous contested redirect, with zero in-depth coverage from independent sources. So now we're here.
- ) 19:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - tons of uncited material which should not have been re-added as per WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect - tons of uncited material which should not have been re-added as per
- ) 19:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Likely a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Likely a case of
- ) 09:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect - zero in-depth coverage, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect - zero in-depth coverage, fails
- ) 09:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect, using an WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect, using an
- ) 10:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draftification. Returned without improvement. The JAMS article is a good source, but the other two are primary. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested draftification. Returned without improvement. The JAMS article is a good source, but the other two are primary. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 21:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "easily verifiable that he's deputy minister". Which is true. However, deputy ministers do not qualify under WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded with the rationale, "easily verifiable that he's deputy minister". Which is true. However, deputy ministers do not qualify under
- ) 09:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero independent sources. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero independent sources. Fails
- ) 15:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Nothing's really changed since the last AfD, except a small role in a film. Same issues as last time. Contested redirect, so back to AfD we go.
- ) 15:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Absent the corruption charges, no notability to this individual. Delete as per WP:PERP.
- Reason: Absent the corruption charges, no notability to this individual. Delete as per
- ) 09:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: A contested prod, and a lot of work was put into the article afterwards, unfortunately, there is still not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source. And searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: A contested prod, and a lot of work was put into the article afterwards, unfortunately, there is still not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source. And searches did not turn up enough to pass
- ) 10:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Despite the plethora of sources, they are all mostly primary sources. And yes the student newspaper of the university is a primary source. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Despite the plethora of sources, they are all mostly primary sources. And yes the student newspaper of the university is a primary source. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet
- ) 10:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Does not meet WP:SIGCOV.
- Reason: Does not meet
- ) 13:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not sure how this relates to the target article, not mentioned there (or on their list of programs).
- ) 16:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet
- ) 19:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources. Current sourcing is only a government publication and a database. Fails WP:GNG. Similar to the recently closed, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry James Houghton.
- ) 19:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources. Current sourcing is only a government publication and a database. Fails WP:GNG. Similar to the recently closed, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry James Houghton.
- ) 10:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. Interesting footnote in Alamo history, perhaps.
- Reason: Simply not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet
- ) 09:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect - wholly unsourced, so reverting the redirect was a violation of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect - wholly unsourced, so reverting the redirect was a violation of
- ) 11:10, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While accomplished there is not enough in-depth coverage for them to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: While accomplished there is not enough in-depth coverage for them to meet
- ) 10:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Does this caste exist? Perhaps. There is sourcing to show that they are a "backward class". Currently, only one of the sources mentions them (although I cannot read the #5 ref), #1 and #2 are the same ref, and both simply mention the backward class in a list, with zero additional information. Refs #3 and #4 do not even mention the class. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage, so fails WP:GNG could be redirected to Gounder, but the redirect was challenged.
- Reason: Does this caste exist? Perhaps. There is sourcing to show that they are a "backward class". Currently, only one of the sources mentions them (although I cannot read the #5 ref), #1 and #2 are the same ref, and both simply mention the backward class in a list, with zero additional information. Refs #3 and #4 do not even mention the class. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage, so fails
- ) 10:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been around for years without any in-depth coverage. Searches did not turn up enough coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Has been around for years without any in-depth coverage. Searches did not turn up enough coverage to show it passes
- ) 10:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Tagged for notability for well over a decade. Zero in-depth coverage either currently, or found in searches. Was boldly, and correctly, imho, redirected to WP:GNG.
- Reason: Tagged for notability for well over a decade. Zero in-depth coverage either currently, or found in searches. Was boldly, and correctly, imho, redirected to
- ) 11:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Tagged for years for improvement. Still zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it meets WP:GNG. Was BLAR'd by an IP, but then the redirect was contested, without improvement. So we are here. Searches did not turn up anything.
- Reason: Tagged for years for improvement. Still zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it meets
- ) 11:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- ) 11:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NOLYMPICSwas changed.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 11:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 12:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - not enough in-depth coverage to show he meets notability. Which was a bit surprising. Draftify might be an option, if someone wants to work on this, but can't find enough in-depth coverage.
- ) 12:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. A case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect. A case of
- ) 12:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable primary school, keeps being recreated by COI/UPE editor. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Non-notable primary school, keeps being recreated by COI/UPE editor. Fails
- ) 12:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested prod with zero in-depth coverage. Searches did not turn up any either. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested prod with zero in-depth coverage. Searches did not turn up any either. Fails
- ) 12:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Zero sourcing to show this place exists (only ref does not mention this place).
- ) 13:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show this meets WP:VERIFY, was draftified in hopes of improvement, but was returned to mainspace without improvement.
- Reason: I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show this meets
- ) 13:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: WP:GNG.
- Reason:
- ) 13:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable individual, COI/UPE creation, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Non-notable individual, COI/UPE creation, fails
- ) 13:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect, without improvements, with zero in-depth coverage from reliable independent, reliable secondary sources. Searches turned up mentions, but no in-depth coverage.
- ) 14:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: G4 was declined. But same issues still apply, will simply repost the original editor's (Oliver Virk) nominating comment: "Not passing WP:ANYBIO; deputies of the banks are not notable. looks like advertisement. WP:PROMO, cross-wiki spam. Russian Wikipedia is marked as Undisclosed paid editing and is being AfDed https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD,_%D0%98%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8C_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87
- talk · contribs) 01:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Please see the article's talk page where the editor who contested the redirect admits there is not enough in-depth sourcing to warrant an article. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Please see the article's talk page where the editor who contested the redirect admits there is not enough in-depth sourcing to warrant an article. Fails
- ) 10:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Single source does not support current information in article, just simply mentions that someplace of this name exists. Was draftified in hopes of improvement, but was returned to mainspace without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough to show that it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Single source does not support current information in article, just simply mentions that someplace of this name exists. Was draftified in hopes of improvement, but was returned to mainspace without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough to show that it passes
- ) 09:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect without a single in-depth reference from an independent reliable secondary source. Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT. Zero real world notability, everything is in-universe.
- Reason: Another contested redirect without a single in-depth reference from an independent reliable secondary source. Delete as per
- ) 09:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Not a single in-depth source from a reliable, independent, secondary source. Fails WP:NPLOT. Searches turned up mentions, but no in-depth discussions of the island. Everything is in-universe.
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Not a single in-depth source from a reliable, independent, secondary source. Fails
- ) 10:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect without a single in-depth source. While there are mentions of the team, obviously, there is no in-depth coverage of the season. Would have draftified, but that's no longer an option. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect without a single in-depth source. While there are mentions of the team, obviously, there is no in-depth coverage of the season. Would have draftified, but that's no longer an option. Fails
- ) 10:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested prod. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:NSKATE.
- Reason: Contested prod. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet
- ) 17:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Again, not sure how this relates to the target, can't see it as one of her films or songs. Not mentioned at target.
- ) 10:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect/draft with zero improvement. Zero independent, reliable secondary sources.
- ) 10:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft moved back without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet either WP:GNG or WP:VERIFY.
- ) 10:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was moved to draft, then declined twice at AfC. Then was simply moved back to mainspace. Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was moved to draft, then declined twice at AfC. Then was simply moved back to mainspace. Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source. Fails
- ) 12:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: It gets a few mentions, but I can't find any in-depth coverage from a reliable, independent, secondary source to show that it meets either WP:CORPDEPTH.
- Reason: It gets a few mentions, but I can't find any in-depth coverage from a reliable, independent, secondary source to show that it meets either
- ) 12:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I'm not finding enough in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources to show they meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: I'm not finding enough in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources to show they meet
- ) 12:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified by WP:GNG. If the Grammy nomination was true, that would qualify. But it's uncited in the article, and a search of the Grammy database doesn't bring up any matches for Veslocki.
- Reason: Was draftified by
- ) 09:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect without a single in-depth source from a reliable, secondary, independent source. No notability outside band. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect without a single in-depth source from a reliable, secondary, independent source. No notability outside band. Fails
- ) 10:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This is a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: This is a case of
- ) 16:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not sure how this relates to the target. Not mentioned there anyplace.
- ) 09:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth sources. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth sources. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 22:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This was just closed as no consensus, without any improvement to the article. She had her 15 minutes. A clear case of WP:BIO1E, no in-depth coverage other than fluff pieces. Outside of her look-alike status, she has no claim to fame. Might be worth a mention somewhere on the Arianna Grande page, if there was a section on "look-alikes".
- ) 12:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification without any improvement. Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, secondary, reliable source.
- ) 12:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect/draft without any in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Case of WP:TOOSOON, but draftify is no longer an option.
- Reason: Another contested redirect/draft without any in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Case of
- ) 13:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Article was AfD'd by WP:ENTERTAINERcriteria, and the general notability guideline which requires significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject."
- Reason: Article was AfD'd by
- ) 13:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass
- ) 20:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect/draft, with zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Most likely a case of WP:TOOSOON, but draftifying is no longer an option.
- Reason: Another contested redirect/draft, with zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Most likely a case of
- ) 10:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft without a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, and so should be draftified, but that is no longer an option.
- Reason: Another contested draft without a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source. Might be a case of
- ) 10:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draftification, but can't find any in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested draftification, but can't find any in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes
- AfD15:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Zero in-depth references from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Tagged for months without improvement. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Zero in-depth references from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Tagged for months without improvement. Fails
- ) 10:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Small local party, gets some mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Small local party, gets some mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 14:35, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect. Nothing's changed since last AfD. To quote that nom, "Non-notable former minor performer; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG."
- ) 18:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect. Zero real-world notability. Delete as per WP:NOTPLOT.
- Reason: Contested redirect. Zero real-world notability. Delete as per
- ) 09:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect by WP:SIGCOVfrom independent, reliable, secondary sources.
- Reason: Contested redirect by
- ) 11:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft returned to mainspace without improvement. Zero in-depth sources from independent reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft returned to mainspace without improvement. Zero in-depth sources from independent reliable secondary sources. Fails
- ) 12:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Some mentions, some unreliable sources (like House of Pop). Can't find any in-depth coverage about them in reliable, secondary, independent sources. Fails WP:GNG. Already been deleted twice in the last 3 years through AfD.
- Reason: Some mentions, some unreliable sources (like House of Pop). Can't find any in-depth coverage about them in reliable, secondary, independent sources. Fails
- ) 12:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draft, with zero improvement and zero in-depth sources. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested draft, with zero improvement and zero in-depth sources. Fails
- ) 12:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: What amounts to a contested draft, since editor simply recreated the same article in mainspace, without any improvements over the draft. Zero in-depth sourcing. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: What amounts to a contested draft, since editor simply recreated the same article in mainspace, without any improvements over the draft. Zero in-depth sourcing. Fails
- ) 12:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Single source, without enough information to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Single source, without enough information to pass
- ) 17:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested prod without improvement. Does not meet either WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Another contested prod without improvement. Does not meet either
- ) 12:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero improvement. Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero improvement. Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source. Fails
- ) 21:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage about him as an individual to show he meets WP:GNG, was redirected to band, but redirect was contested.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage about him as an individual to show he meets
- ) 08:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This appears to be a definite case of WP:TOOSOON. And not sure why it would point to the prior year target.
- Reason: This appears to be a definite case of
- ) 09:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet notability. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Certainly accomplished, but I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet notability. Fails
- ) 09:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes of improvement. 2 primary sources were added and it was moved back to mainspace. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes of improvement. 2 primary sources were added and it was moved back to mainspace. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 09:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up any in-depth references from independent, reliable, secondary sources. There are two pieces in the current article, from 13th Man Sports and Northern Tribune, but neither source looks to be reliable, containing simple postings with no editorial oversight. Fails WP:GNG
- Reason: Searches did not turn up any in-depth references from independent, reliable, secondary sources. There are two pieces in the current article, from 13th Man Sports and Northern Tribune, but neither source looks to be reliable, containing simple postings with no editorial oversight. Fails
- ) 10:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: I can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they meet
- ) 10:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources to meet
- ) 10:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect without improvement. Gets mentions, but can't find enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect without improvement. Gets mentions, but can't find enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 10:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect without improvement. Zero in-depth coverage from independent sources. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect without improvement. Zero in-depth coverage from independent sources. Fails
- ) 12:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draft without a single in-depth reference from an independent source. Searches turned up mentions, but no in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested draft without a single in-depth reference from an independent source. Searches turned up mentions, but no in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 13:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Notability tag was removed without improvement. WP:GNG.
- Reason: Notability tag was removed without improvement.
- ) 00:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth sources, and zero improvement. Might be a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth sources, and zero improvement. Might be a case of
- ) 00:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth sources, and zero improvement. Might be a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth sources, and zero improvement. Might be a case of
- ) 00:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth sources, and zero improvement. Might be a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth sources, and zero improvement. Might be a case of
- ) 09:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth coverage. Searches did not turn up any, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth coverage. Searches did not turn up any, fails
- ) 09:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth, independent sources. Probably a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth, independent sources. Probably a case of
- ) 09:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth coverage. Might be a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth coverage. Might be a case of
- ) 10:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage about this player to satisfy WP:GNG. There are mentions and routine sports coverage, but no in-depth coverage.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage about this player to satisfy
- ) 10:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft with no improvement, and zero in-depth sourcing (3 of the current sources are dead links). Might be a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft with no improvement, and zero in-depth sourcing (3 of the current sources are dead links). Might be a case of
- ) 10:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft with zero in-depth coverage and no improvement. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft with zero in-depth coverage and no improvement. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 10:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft with zero improvements and zero in-depth coverage. 2 of the current 3 sources are empty. Might be a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft with zero improvements and zero in-depth coverage. 2 of the current 3 sources are empty. Might be a case of
- ) 10:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth coverage. 2 of the current 3 sources do not even discuss the topic. Most likely a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth coverage. 2 of the current 3 sources do not even discuss the topic. Most likely a case of
- ) 10:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth coverage. Probably a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero in-depth coverage. Probably a case of
- ) 11:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero improvement and zero in-depth sources. Most likely a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested redirect with zero improvement and zero in-depth sources. Most likely a case of
- talk · contribs) 12:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While national elections are notable, this one is a case of WP:TOOSOON, as there is currently no in-depth coverage on the subject.
- Reason: While national elections are notable, this one is a case of
- ) 14:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement and with zero in-depth independent sources. Most likely a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement and with zero in-depth independent sources. Most likely a case of
- ) 14:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement and with zero in-depth independent sources. Most likely a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement and with zero in-depth independent sources. Most likely a case of
- ) 14:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement and with zero in-depth independent sources. Most likely a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement and with zero in-depth independent sources. Most likely a case of
- ) 14:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement and with zero in-depth independent sources. Most likely a case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement and with zero in-depth independent sources. Most likely a case of
- ) 10:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - was in better shape before redirection, but still fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect - was in better shape before redirection, but still fails
- ) 09:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect without improvement - While I love Knight (I have 8 of his novels in my library), there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. All the coverage is simply about its publication history. Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes WP:GNG. The Michael Ashley source is nice brief piece on it, but even that is not that in-depth.
- Reason: Contested redirect without improvement - While I love Knight (I have 8 of his novels in my library), there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. All the coverage is simply about its publication history. Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes
- ) 09:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement. First, the sole source is not about this subject, which appears to be WP:OSEargument.
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement. First, the sole source is not about this subject, which appears to be
- ) 00:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Very promotional, and while it does get some local coverage, does not pass WP:ORGDEPTH.
- Reason: Very promotional, and while it does get some local coverage, does not pass
- ) 12:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Working musician, but cannot find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG. Was draftified, where another source was added (the Vive Le Rock), a review of his self-published album, and then returned to mainspace.
- Reason: Working musician, but cannot find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet
- ) 12:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While tragic, this is simply another murder. It happened so recently, that it is difficult to ascertain whether or not this will have any lasting coverage, but as for now, WP:NOTNEWS.
- Reason: While tragic, this is simply another murder. It happened so recently, that it is difficult to ascertain whether or not this will have any lasting coverage, but as for now,
- ) 09:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification which was returned to mainspace without improvement. Likely case of WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draftification which was returned to mainspace without improvement. Likely case of
- ) 10:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not exactly a contested draftification, but was simply recreated in mainspace after having been draftification, with no improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not exactly a contested draftification, but was simply recreated in mainspace after having been draftification, with no improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 12:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft/redirect with zero improvement. Might be a case of WP:SIGCOVcould be added to show it passes notability requirements.
- Reason: Another contested draft/redirect with zero improvement. Might be a case of
- ) 10:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been deleted twice - once just 2 weeks ago. The sourcing in the reception section is brief mentions, no in-depth coverage. Editor insists on recreating article just weeks after last close. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Has been deleted twice - once just 2 weeks ago. The sourcing in the reception section is brief mentions, no in-depth coverage. Editor insists on recreating article just weeks after last close. Fails
- ) 10:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Recently deleted I am going to paraphrase WP:RS or not and he is only mentioned twice in passing, Football NSW, which mentions him in passing as a goalscorer, and The Football Sack, which mentions him once, saying that he made his debut. None of the above sources contain any detailed coverage of Windust. An Australian searchonly yielded the usual database sites which are not acceptable for SPORTBASIC." There was also a brief discussion on the talk page. But still zero in-depth independent sources.
- Reason: Recently deleted I am going to paraphrase
- ) 11:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was declined three times at AfC, by WP:GNG, should be a redirect, since it is mentioned at the The Masked Singer article.
- Reason: Was declined three times at AfC, by
- ) 12:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification. WP:GNG. Currently there is not enough in-depth coverage.
- Reason: Another contested draftification.
- ) 12:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draftification with a single in-depth source (News18). Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested draftification with a single in-depth source (News18). Fails
- ) 12:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet
- ) 12:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draftification without improvement. Not a single in-depth source so fails WP:GEOLAND.
- Reason: Contested draftification without improvement. Not a single in-depth source so fails
- ) 13:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft/redirect with zero improvement. Might be a case of WP:SIGCOVcould be added to show it passes notability requirements.
- Reason: Another contested draft/redirect with zero improvement. Might be a case of
- ) 13:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft/redirect with zero improvement. Might be a case of WP:SIGCOVcould be added to show it passes notability requirements.
- Reason: Another contested draft/redirect with zero improvement. Might be a case of
- ) 13:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft/redirect with zero improvement. Might be a case of WP:SIGCOVcould be added to show it passes notability requirements.
- Reason: Another contested draft/redirect with zero improvement. Might be a case of
May 2023
- talk · contribs) 10:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Sent to draft for improvement, but returned to mainspace without any. Currently, there is one semi-decent source (Primera Hora), but the others are either not significant coverage or unreliable sources. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Sent to draft for improvement, but returned to mainspace without any. Currently, there is one semi-decent source (Primera Hora), but the others are either not significant coverage or unreliable sources. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 10:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement. If there was some proof that this was a legally recognized populated place, it would pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft without improvement. If there was some proof that this was a legally recognized populated place, it would pass
- ) 11:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable Malaysian civil who meets neither WP:GNG. Was draftified, declined at AfC by Robertsky, and then recreated in mainspace.
- Reason: Non-notable Malaysian civil who meets neither
- ) 14:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was sent to draft for improvement, but simply recreated in mainspace. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was sent to draft for improvement, but simply recreated in mainspace. Fails
- ) 17:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: No indication how this is related to the target, not mentioned there.
- ) 17:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target, not sure how this is related to the topic.
- ) 17:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another redirect where it is not mentioned in the target, not sure how it relates.
- ) 17:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target, do not see how this is a valid redirect.
- ) 17:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target, not sure how it relates.
- ) 17:16, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned at the target. Unsure how it relates.
- ) 17:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another redirect with no apparent linking to the target.
- ) 17:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned at target, no indication of relationship to subject.
- ) 17:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Again, not mentioned in target.
- ) 17:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target.
- ) 15:13, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not mentioned in target, doesn't seem to be a translation of the term, so not seeing how it relates.
- ) 19:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draftification without improvement. Case of WP:NOTNEWS.
- Reason: Contested draftification without improvement. Case of
- ) 08:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: This is a WP:FORK of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, and already covered in target article. Simply his title. Should be a redirect, but that continues to be contested.
- Reason: This is a
- ) 09:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified in order to be improved. Was declined twice at AfC, by WP:GNG, despite having been tagged for issues for over a month.
- Reason: Was draftified in order to be improved. Was declined twice at AfC, by
- ) 10:04, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Undiscussed SPLIT, of information which is covered in target by COI/UPE editor (see that editor's talk page). Should be restored redirect - but simply doing so is no longer an option.
- ) 10:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Article tagged for years. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage of this branch/chapter of the organization. Could be redirected to Society for Information Management, but that's been contested.
- ) 10:19, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes notability.
- ) 10:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another undiscussed SPLIT, of information which is covered in target by COI/UPE editor (see that editor's talk page). Should be restored redirect - but simply doing so is no longer an option.
- ) 16:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement or rationale, was a contested draft without improvement. No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was deprodded without improvement or rationale, was a contested draft without improvement. No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails
- ) 11:16, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches did not turn up enough other than routine sports coverage.
- ) 11:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While it received coverage at the time, there is no enduring coverage of the event. Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS.
- Reason: While it received coverage at the time, there is no enduring coverage of the event. Delete as per
- ) 11:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While it gets mentions, there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show that it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: While it gets mentions, there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show that it passes
- ) 11:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was a contested draft without improvement. No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was a contested draft without improvement. No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails
- ) 11:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was a contested draft without improvement. No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was a contested draft without improvement. No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails
- ) 11:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Okay, this is a well-written start article, with multiple sources. However, almost all of the sources do not even mention the film. Only two, both primary, talk about the documentary. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Okay, this is a well-written start article, with multiple sources. However, almost all of the sources do not even mention the film. Only two, both primary, talk about the documentary. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage. Fails
- ) 09:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Declined twice at AfC, simply moved to mainspace. Tagged for improvement, eventually moved back to draft, and then returned to mainspace by probably COI editor without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Declined twice at AfC, simply moved to mainspace. Tagged for improvement, eventually moved back to draft, and then returned to mainspace by probably COI editor without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 09:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification without improvement, and not a single in-depth reliable source. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it meets WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draftification without improvement, and not a single in-depth reliable source. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it meets
- ) 10:31, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it meets WP:GNG.
- Reason: Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it meets
- ) 11:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While it received coverage at the time, does not pass WP:NEVENT.
- Reason: While it received coverage at the time, does not pass
- ) 22:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: To quote another editor who I asked to take a look at this, "Coastal Poso simply is a dialect of the Pamona language predominantly spoken by Muslims in the Coastal Poso area, and it differs from the interior Pamona variety spoken around Tentena (= the prestige dialect) as much as the Black Country dialect differs from Brummie English. There is no WP:SIGCOV about the Coastal Poso dialect that would justify a standalone. And there is not a single source among the references cited in that new content fork that treats this dialect as a distinct language." Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: To quote another editor who I asked to take a look at this, "Coastal Poso simply is a dialect of the Pamona language predominantly spoken by Muslims in the Coastal Poso area, and it differs from the interior Pamona variety spoken around Tentena (= the prestige dialect) as much as the Black Country dialect differs from Brummie English. There is no WP:SIGCOV about the Coastal Poso dialect that would justify a standalone. And there is not a single source among the references cited in that new content fork that treats this dialect as a distinct language." Fails
- ) 09:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: As was said when it was prodded back in 2018, "NN shopping center. According to the article, it has only 10 stores making it very routine (WP:GNG.
- Reason: As was said when it was prodded back in 2018, "NN shopping center. According to the article, it has only 10 stores making it very routine (
- ) 09:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Prodded, then restored, currently not enough sources to pass WP:VERIFY, and searches did not turn up enough to show it meets notability criteria.
- Reason: Prodded, then restored, currently not enough sources to pass
- ) 10:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: I can't find enough sourcing to show that this passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: I can't find enough sourcing to show that this passes
- ) 14:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification without improvement. Found several mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draftification without improvement. Found several mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes
- ) 15:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Non-notable individual of a non-notable chapter of an organization which does not appear notable. Not enough in-depth coverage for them to passWP:GNG.
- Reason: Non-notable individual of a non-notable chapter of an organization which does not appear notable. Not enough in-depth coverage for them to pass
- ) 16:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draftification without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 16:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: G4 was declined with the rationale that the decision of the prior AfD was based on a deprecated notability criteria. However, it was deleted due to failure to meet WP:NFOOTBALL, there is a long-standing consensus that a minimal amount of play in a fully-pro league (though the claim that the 4th division was a fully-pro league in 1980 is a bit dubious) doesn't warrant the presumption if the article comprehensively fails the GNG; as this article does."
- Reason: G4 was declined with the rationale that the decision of the prior AfD was based on a deprecated notability criteria. However, it was deleted due to failure to meet
- ) 16:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Another contested draftification without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass
- ) 16:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails
- ) 16:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails
- ) 16:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: No indication this is a legally recognized place, fails
- ) 10:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Other than the crime, no in-depth coverage of this government bureaucrat. Delete as per WP:BIO1E.
- Reason: Other than the crime, no in-depth coverage of this government bureaucrat. Delete as per
- ) 11:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and can't see how they meet any of the SNGs.
- Reason: Can't find enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 11:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Would have prodded this, since it is such an obvious case of WP:NOTNEWS, but the editor constantly re-creates the article, first it was rejected at AfC by Johannes Maximilian, the following day it was created in mainspace, but then moved to draft by Deb, after which it was submitted without improvement and declined by AngusWOOF, after which it was simply recreated in mainspace, again without improvement.
- Reason: Would have prodded this, since it is such an obvious case of
- ) 15:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While tragic, no enduring coverage, so delete as per WP:NOTNEWS.
- Reason: While tragic, no enduring coverage, so delete as per
- ) 09:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While there are some mentions of them, not enough in-depth coverage of them to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: While there are some mentions of them, not enough in-depth coverage of them to pass
- ) 10:12, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: After looking at the current sourcing, the academic has a weak h-Index of 14, there is no in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources, so meets neither WP:GNG.
- Reason: After looking at the current sourcing, the academic has a weak h-Index of 14, there is no in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable, secondary sources, so meets neither
- ) 11:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified, then returned to mainspace after the addition of a single, non-reliable source (it's a PR piece by the Delaware nation, not an actual article). Gets the usual routine sports coverage, but no in-depth sourcing so as to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was draftified, then returned to mainspace after the addition of a single, non-reliable source (it's a PR piece by the Delaware nation, not an actual article). Gets the usual routine sports coverage, but no in-depth sourcing so as to meet
- ) 11:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes of improvement, moved back after the addition of a single, 4-line announcement. Zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Fails WP:SIGCOV.
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes of improvement, moved back after the addition of a single, 4-line announcement. Zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Fails
- ) 11:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Moved out of draft solely sourced to primary non-reliable sources. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Moved out of draft solely sourced to primary non-reliable sources. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to pass
- ) 09:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was redirected using the same rationale as at WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was redirected using the same rationale as at
- ) 09:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was redirected using the same rationale as at WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was redirected using the same rationale as at
- ) 22:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified, then returned to mainspace without improvement, and without a single in-depth source from an independent, reliable source. Fails GNG.
- ) 19:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Moved to draft with hopes of improvment, but returned without any improvement, and with zero in-depth independent sourcing. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Moved to draft with hopes of improvment, but returned without any improvement, and with zero in-depth independent sourcing. Fails
- ) 10:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: disputed redirect - not enough in-depth independent coverage to show they meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: disputed redirect - not enough in-depth independent coverage to show they meet
- ) 11:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Redirected as per WP:NPLOT, contested, but not enough in-depth coverage to show notability.
- Reason: Redirected as per
- ) 12:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Previous AfD resulted in soft delete, and it was reconstituted. Fails WP:NPROF.
- Reason: Previous AfD resulted in soft delete, and it was reconstituted. Fails
- ) 13:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Moved to Draft for improvement. Moved back without a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable sources.
- ) 13:03, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NPROF.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 13:54, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches did not turn up enough other than routine sports coverage. Fails WP:NCORP.
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches did not turn up enough other than routine sports coverage. Fails
- ) 13:54, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches did not turn up enough other than routine sports coverage. Fails WP:NCORP.
- Reason: Another contested draftification with zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches did not turn up enough other than routine sports coverage. Fails
- ) 13:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Moved to draft by Mccapra, then moved back without improvement. Another contested draftification with zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Searches did not turn up enough other than routine sports coverage.
- ) 13:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable sources to meet
- ) 14:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft with zero in-depth independent sourcing. Nothing but routine sports coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft with zero in-depth independent sourcing. Nothing but routine sports coverage. Fails
- ) 17:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: G4 was declined, yet article still suffers from same issues as very recent AfD.
- ) 10:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Another contested draft with zero improvement, and zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources which are not routine sports coverage. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Another contested draft with zero improvement, and zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources which are not routine sports coverage. Fails
- ) 00:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Nothing's changed from last month's AfD, which was a pretty decisive decision.
- ) 12:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes of improvement. Was returned to mainspace without a single in-depth source. Waited several weeks to see if there was going to be any effort to improve the article, and then after the election was weeks in the past, redirected to the council page, which was immediately reverted without improvement. Another week has gone by, and still not a single in-depth source. Currently fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Was draftified in hopes of improvement. Was returned to mainspace without a single in-depth source. Waited several weeks to see if there was going to be any effort to improve the article, and then after the election was weeks in the past, redirected to the council page, which was immediately reverted without improvement. Another week has gone by, and still not a single in-depth source. Currently fails
- ) 12:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Promotional article full of primary sources, press releases, and brief mentions. I can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes WP:GNG.
- Reason: Promotional article full of primary sources, press releases, and brief mentions. I can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes
- ) 20:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Was draftified in hopes of improvement, then moved back by an editor without improvement.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 11:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested redirect - not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 11:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Has been redirected by several editors, no in-depth coverage outside show. Fails WP:GNG.
- Reason: Has been redirected by several editors, no in-depth coverage outside show. Fails
- ) 11:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Okay, this has been out on the queue for quite a while. Does not appear to have enough in-depth sourcing from a non-in-universe perspective to pass notability criteria.
- ) 11:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested redirect - all the in-depth sourcing is about the hospital. Should be a redirect.
- ) 12:17, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Other than the brief LA Times obit, I cannot find any other in-depth coverage of this dancer/choreographer.
- ) 13:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.
- Reason: Not enough in-depth coverage to meet
- ) 13:50, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: While accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: While accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage to pass
- ) 13:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Popular does not equal notable. Not enough in-depth coverage to overcome WP:GNG.
- Reason: Popular does not equal notable. Not enough in-depth coverage to overcome
- ) 14:09, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Contested draftification. Was returned to mainspace without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG.
- Reason: Contested draftification. Was returned to mainspace without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass
- ) 20:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Delete as per WP:PERP. Zero notability outside murder.
- Reason: Delete as per
- ) 19:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Disputed prod about a non-notable primary school. Currently zero references, but searches did not turn up enough to pass 19:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
June 2023
- ) 00:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Was closed as no consensus, but zero folks participated, even after 2 relists. Other than the crime, no in-depth coverage of this government bureaucrat. Delete as per WP:BIO1E.
- Reason: Was closed as no consensus, but zero folks participated, even after 2 relists. Other than the crime, no in-depth coverage of this government bureaucrat. Delete as per
September 2023
- ) 08:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Currently zero in-depth coverage on this station, and searches did not turn up enough to meet WP:GNG. Was draftified in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without improvement.
- Reason: Currently zero in-depth coverage on this station, and searches did not turn up enough to meet
October 2023
- ) 01:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Reason: Not eligible for draftification due to its age. Has existed for over a decade without single independent reference. Searches do not show any in-depth coverage from independent sources. Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 CDC Tour series, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 PDC Players Championship series, and several more.