User talk:Ornithoptera/Archive 1

Archives

Archive 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of geological features on Vesta

added links pointing to Calpurnia, Antonia, Severina, Aricia, Fabia, Albana, Postumia, Marcia, Eusebia and Lepida

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of geological features on Titan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concordia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of geological features on Charon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to tell the page you edited has wrong information and there is no history that there is so I would to reverse the editt

Libyan kid 543 (talk) 16:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ornithoptera. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cyclosia pieridoides (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bangka and Mentawai

Chalcosiinae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dysphania

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francesca Fiorentini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Francesca Fiorentini, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ornithoptera! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Acanthacorydalis fruhstorferi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

talk) 03:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Sabrina Sojourner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:36, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nemoptera sinuata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No Straight Roads, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry C. Elliott, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 04:55, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Francesca Fiorentini, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Ornithoptera. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 20:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You noted in your edit to TOH page that "the Bubbleblabber review is not from a reputable source or reviewer, and it does not contribute to the section." While I think Bubblebladder can be good, to be honest, they are often hostile to LGBTQ narratives, so I don't mind that the removal. Sadly, sometimes they are the only people to write about certain episodes... I think at this point, they (Bubblebladder) should have a Wikipedia page, but that's a whole other discussion. So, thanks for removing that. --Historyday01 (talk) 21:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. I appreciate your thanks for the edit. While I believe it is important to include a diversity of opinions, Bubbleblabber is a relatively small platform and its reviewers and community are relatively outside of relevancy during this time. Especially when the statements do nothing to contribute to the overall section. Thank you again though, I'm doing my best to help improve Wikipedia the best I can. Ornithoptera (talk) 21:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creemos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Raven and the First Men, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 04:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Apruebo Dignidad instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There is an article on this party. Please review and update the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Apruebo Dignidad
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Apruebo Dignidad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:10, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nemoptera coa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Borocera madagascariensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 10:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Borocera cajani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I just wanted to say you have been the best! Keep on going, and I hope you have a good day! PuzzledWaste (talk) 04:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tusk shell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gadila.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that (a) you must not start the article about a new MP without citing a reference to

Seriously, there's no need to rush into creating an unreferenced stub right away. It is not going to kill anybody if the articles don't get started until tomorrow morning. Bearcat (talk) 04:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And no, just saying "she was called the winner by so-and-so with X number of polls reporting" is not a reference, either. A reference is a footnote to a news article that states "Lori Idlout has been elected" in words and sentences. Bearcat (talk) 04:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I got a bit too eager. Its been my first time being informed of such, and thank you for letting me know, I'll keep it in mind next time. --Ornithoptera (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ornithoglossum undulatum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nemeobiinae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rhyothemis fuliginosa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 03:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patti LuPone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Doherty.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 November 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Japanese general election, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

Hi, I've finished adding comments to the GA review. None of them are major, the biggest being a suggested copy-edit (which I've offered to assist), but you'll need to address them if you want the article to pass the GA process. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chiswick Chap, thank you for your review! This is my first GA Nomination, and I would definitely appreciate some advice moving forward since I'm a bit unfamiliar with the process. Do I reply to you on the review subpage itself or do I go ahead with editing it? I would definitely be welcome for you to edit the offered sentence as I am a bit uncertain as to how I would reword it myself. Thank you so much and I hope to work with you shortly! --Ornithoptera (talk) 00:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replies are a) actions in the article, and then b) in the GA1 page under each of my comments when they're done. I'll take that as an invitation to do a bit of copy-editing as I'd suggested - normally reviewers only do "minor" edits like punctuation. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your help, and I hope you can understand this is a bit unfamiliar with me so I hope this goes well! I'm busy at the moment, but I'll get to editing as soon as I can! Thank you again Chiswick Chap! --Ornithoptera (talk) 08:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edited. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rhyothemis fuliginosa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rhyothemis fuliginosa (example pictured) is known as the "butterfly dragonfly"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rhyothemis fuliginosa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rhyothemis fuliginosa), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Borocera cajani you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Borocera cajani for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Falcon Lake Incident, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 03:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rhodinia fugax, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 08:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sonchus fruticosus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 06:58, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tetracanthagyna plagiata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 18:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		You know, a lot of the prep-set building I do at DYK is done rather late, so it can get rather dreary copy/pasting sometimes. Good god, does seeing what you write just bring a smile to my face sometimes. You are consistently chipper, heartwarming, sympathetic, competent, and upbeat in the face of every message you come across. Your words don't just affect the people you write them to, they brighten the atmosphere of Did you know as if you're creating the sky. thanks for making my roles and this place more enjoyable—do stick around :) cheers! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 08:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 08:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron: Oh my gosh! Thank you so much for the barnstar! As soon as I read your message I just got incredibly giddy and a bit emotional honestly, and a bit at a loss of words! Thank you so much for your kind words and I really do hope we can work together on DYK together, its been an amazing time working together with other Wikipedians on it! I really cannot thank you enough for your kind words and I'm genuinely thankful for every single word on your message, I genuinely feel touched by your message and I'm rambling here but thank you so very much!! Ornithoptera (talk) 08:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

aaaaaa—of course! :) it really is a great community to work in, I've had a great time here as well.

p.s. no worries about the rambling—i get so excited whenever i find a new article topic to write or when i get a barnstar, i can't even think straight enough to touch my keyboard. I definitely end up making lots of pasta ramblioli. Anyways, cheers again :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 09:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, thank you so very much! I'm really glad to be working with you and the other members of the DYK community and I hope to see you around more often soon! You're the best! Ornithoptera (talk) 09:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I realize I never said this: Thanks for that. I appreciate your enthusiasm around DYK and think this kind of recognition is well-earned. I say this so often that it almost feels cliche, but it's sincere: Hope to see you around soon and often. "Till next time?" A second barnstar here would be brash, so instead a small gift: . Urve (talk) 22:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was really an excellent pun. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 06:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Borocera cajani, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Borocera cajani produces a form of wild silk that has been harvested for hundreds of years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Borocera cajani. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Borocera cajani), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Falcon Lake Incident, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Falcon Lake Incident is considered "Canada's best-documented UFO case"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Falcon Lake Incident. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Falcon Lake Incident), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,504 views (729.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 06:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elcysma westwoodi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 04:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hebetica sylviae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 07:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Awet Tesfaiesus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Awet Tesfaiesus was the first black woman ever elected to the Bundestag? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Awet Tesfaiesus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Awet Tesfaiesus), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On

Styx's name derives from its seeming to have "come from the underworld"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Styx (butterfly). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Styx (butterfly)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hebetica sylviae, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hebetica sylviae (pictured) was discovered after a two-year-old named Sylvie overwatered her backyard? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hebetica sylviae. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hebetica sylviae), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,549 views (879.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 05:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tetracanthagyna plagiata, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the giant hawker, the largest living dragonfly, with a wingspan of 163 millimetres (6.4 in), has larvae that exhibit "ballistic defecation"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tetracanthagyna plagiata. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tetracanthagyna plagiata), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,391 views (532.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ornithoptera, no, I was completely aware that you are indeed the creator of Insects in Japanese culture. However, just because you did all the work, unfortunately you don't own the text! In fact, anyone is entitled to pick up on any draft and continue to work on it, and indeed submit it for review or move it to main-space, without the permission of the draft's creator. In my view, the article you wrote was already referenced to a better standard than many, and was far more than a mere skeleton. It was a good article. I think, therefore, that it was entirely appropriate for another editor to move it. They should have informed you; it was not courteous for them to do it without telling you. But having done it, the AfD should not have been closed. In my view, the subject is an important one, and likely to attract attention from multiple good editors. I feel strongly that it will be a better article if open to collaborative editing (that's a basic principle of WP anyway), and it's not going to attract collaborative editing while it languishes in draft space. I'm not accusing you of this, but there is a real risk that perfectionist editors will sit on good articles indefinitely, never feeling they're quite adequate for submission; we must therefore try to accept the opinions and work of others, building on what we do. I very, very much hope you will submit this article for main-space without delay. Indeed I've asked the closing editor to reopen the AfD as I felt there was no consensus to draftify (the person who moved it to main space, and I, both presumably believe it's main-space ready). I wish everyone who submitted articles wrote them half as well as you, who didn't! I'd also emphasise that articles don't need to be "perfect" or "finished" before hitting main space. They will be perfected and improved over decades, anyway. Sorry to be having a rant! Elemimele (talk) 15:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As the AfC reviewer, I would not have accepted if I'd realized it was going over the head of the only contributor who was actively improving the article, but I do agree that it seems ready for mainspace. It's a great article! Better than most that I accept at AfC and very interesting. I don't think anyone should force you to publish it to mainspace if you're still working on it, but I'd like to gently encourage it anyway. And you should feel free to publish it directly to mainspace whenever you are ready, it'll only get better and I see no reason to have it go through review again. Rusalkii (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is quite late of a second question, this whole protracted process coupled with it being a troubling time in my life due to my course load was not a healthy combination I'll let you know. @Rusalkii: when I am able to, how would I move the article draft to mainspace when I'm ready? This is my first time and I just want to know beforehand for the time when I am able to. Ornithoptera (talk) 07:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You want to move the page from draft to article space by opening the "Move" dialog (under "More" in the top right). There should be an option there to change the page from "Draft" to "(Article)".

I hope school has been easier for you lately! I'm on break right now and it's such a relief. Rusalkii (talk) 18:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it guys, I really do! I do understand that its a meaningful subject but I was genuinely a bit cheesed that the work was considered done when it was only just midway done. Heck, the introductory paragraph was just adapted from some section where I would have reviewed the cultural context so that sat wrongly with me. Thank you so much for all your help everyone and I appreciate the feedback. Though in all honesty, I wasn't being a perfectionist, I just was aware that I was only half done and was confused that someone just randomly submitted it with any warning or anything at all whatsoever. I just needed time to focus on school is all. The one thing that did bother me was that it was only alone for a week, given I just finished my final exams, it seemed a bit hurried when there were large chunks of the page simply unfinished. Though I understand its a place for collaboration, I just wanted a bit more time (and a warning!) for the future. Thank you so much for the kind words though and I'll be sure to keep on doing my best. Todays been a long day so I apologize if my wording's a bit stilted or I misread something, please be patient with me! Ornithoptera (talk) 17:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, @Ornithoptera:, I'm sorry if I came across as a bit ferocious. But I'd agree with Rusalkii, stick it in mainspace as soon as you're ready, it's a nice article on an interesting subject, and I also see no reason for it to need reviewing again. All I'd say is that if you find yourself in a few weeks simply too busy to do any more on it, don't hesitate to put it in mainspace anyway. You're doing a great job. Elemimele (talk) 21:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elcysma westwoodi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Elcysma westwoodi is considered "the most damaging lepidopteran pest of Prunus × yedoensis"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elcysma westwoodi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elcysma westwoodi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

The article Rhodinia fugax you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rhodinia fugax for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

The article Tetracanthagyna plagiata you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tetracanthagyna plagiata for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nannophyopsis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Great work on creating new articles Pretty sure you have no need to use the AFC process any more. Theroadislong (talk) 09:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

Melibe colemani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thank you for your contributions. I reviewed and enjoyed the article. Bruxton (talk) 22:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mimaporia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 20:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erasmia pulchella, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:34, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Louth (crater), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Papilio natewa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Corynaea crassa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peruvian Viagra grows on the roots of plants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Corynaea crassa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Corynaea crassa), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,669 views (472.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2022 – nice work!

Bruxton (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Space Family Carlvinson manga cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cristina Calderón, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you’ve been working on another draft of Arceus. Just FYI, the article was deleted again last year - the version just before the deletion can be seen here. Maybe you can salvage some sources from there. Hope you have better luck with the AFC/AFD. Juxlos (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Louth (crater), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ice mound (pictured) at the center of the crater Louth is the warmest permanent body of water on the Martian surface? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Louth (crater). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Louth (crater)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 16,152 views (1346 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2022 – nice work!

Bruxton (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 11:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Melibe colemani, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Coleman's Melibe is said to look like a "string of snot in the water"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Melibe colemani. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Melibe colemani), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Well, this is an odd one. My first suspicion, since I remember building that set, was that I forgot to copy/paste your credit—it's happened before. Surprisingly enough, it turned out not to be my fault. That's a new one :) Looks like DYKUpdateBot crashed right in the middle of updating credits, and since yours was the quirky, no one ever got around to awarding you on that one (or, for that matter, Unknown Temptation, No Swan So Fine, or the editor whose credit I actually did forget to add to that set, I think it was Thriley). Sorry about that, that's pretty weird – cheers! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 19:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kakiniit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 04:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Congratulations on getting your article Kakiniit accepted! Thank you so much for your contributions here on Wikipedia! Heart (talk) 04:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Space Family Carlvinson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Japanese manga Space Family Carlvinson is likely named after an aircraft carrier that is itself named after U.S. congressman Carl Vinson? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Space Family Carlvinson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Space Family Carlvinson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hope Tala, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British singer Hope Tala turned down an opportunity to pursue a master's degree at the University of Cambridge in favour of pursuing a career in music? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hope Tala. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hope Tala), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Single-bamboo drifting, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Miao art of balancing on a bamboo log has been described as "water ballet"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Single bamboo drifting. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Single-bamboo drifting), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 12:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,752 views (646.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work!

the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zebedee Nungak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 04:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks worth nominating for

WP:GA, honestly. -- asilvering (talk) 04:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

You're the second person who told me that actually! Thank you so much for your kind words Asilvering! I'll be sure to look into it when my time frees up! Ornithoptera (talk) 04:34, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ornithoptera, I was wondering whether you were planning to return to your review here now that progress has been made, or if you'd prefer that a new reviewer be found. Please continue your review if you wish, or let me know here if the latter is true. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anaea (butterfly), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ptychandra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 10:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

plants and people

Thank you for quality articles about people such as Hope Tala and Cristina Calderón, butterflies such as Tetracanthagyna plagiata, and plants such as Melibe colemani and Corynaea crassa, and all this being "heartwarming, sympathetic, competent, and upbeat", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no.

]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	For an excellent April Fools Day DYK which I'm sure brightened the day of countless people Fritzmann (message me) 17:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny

On 7 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the satirical study of "Qallunology", the study of white people, in the film Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny, is meant as a critique of the treatment of Inuit culture by anthropologists? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,008 views (584.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 10:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Film Barnstar
	For your work on Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny, an excellent and overlooked film topic, and bringing it to attention through DYK. Great work! – Reidgreg (talk) 06:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kakiniit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Inuit traditional belief holds that women without facial tattoos would be sent to the land of the crestfallen to spend eternity with smoke coming from their throats and their heads hanging down? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kakiniit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kakiniit), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,493 views (624.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Love the page on kakiniit! Lajmmoore (talk) 12:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for creating the excellent North Calotte People articles! JackWilfred (talk) 10:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

On 15 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zebedee Nungak, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Zebedee Nungak, taken as a child for an experiment by the Canadian government, went on to "cross antlers with prime ministers, premiers and Québec separatists"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zebedee Nungak. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Zebedee Nungak), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,450 views (647.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For your efforts on North Calotte People. May this tea help you keep up the good work! CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

On 16 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anaea (butterfly), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that butterflies of the genus Anaea (example pictured) are said to have "commanded the admiration of even the most gold-mad conquistadores"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anaea (butterfly). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Anaea (butterfly)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]