Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 22

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awel Mara

Awel Mara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - this doesn't pass
  WP:NALBUM. Maybe it can be added as a section in the article of the singer. KagunduTalk To Me 09:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not notable album.122.171.237.5 (talk) 05:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Besides confirming the its existence, there is no significant discussion of the album in RS. Doesn't meet
  WP:NALBUM: there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore there isn't "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." —Ojorojo (talk) 15:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nancy Ajram. The redirection may be re-evaluated if reliable sources in Arabic are forthcoming. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Ajram: Greatest Hits

Nancy Ajram: Greatest Hits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Nancy Ajram is one of the most well known singers in the Arab world. She has an international audience, similar to many kpop groups today. I would like to search for more sources. If this is an official greatest hits album, I am pretty sure there will be sources in Arabic.--DreamLinker (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Any help is appreciated. I used to listen to many of these songs and I am pretty sure it is a notable album. Unfortunately I cannot read Arabic.--DreamLinker (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Although she is very popular, her albums haven't received much written commentary – besides confirming the its existence, there is no significant discussion of the album in RS. Doesn't meet
  WP:NALBUM: there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore there isn't "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." —Ojorojo (talk) 16:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to her per other discussions. z'L3X1 (distænt write) 23:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Let's try to sort this out using regular editing, which may include merging, and if not, we can revisit the possibility of deletion at a later time. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  08:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bardon Park (Western Australia)

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable park. Sure there's information on it but no actual proof of notability. Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability etc. — IVORK _Discuss 13:08, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I searched but could find no references suggesting that this is a recognized tourist attraction or otherwise more than an attractive but
  WP:NGEO or otherwise. (Note: there's a more notable Bardon Park in Leicestershire.) --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Community group https://www.facebook.com/bardonpark/

Indigenous art installation https://facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=692968497568450&id=677400495791917

Tourist attraction park playground https://www.weekendnotes.com/bardon-park/ — Preceding

• Delete Very reluctantly. There just does not seem to be anywhere near enough to establish notability at this time. It is mentioned in WA Parliamentary debate though. As much as I do not like to see the first article by a
  WP:NEWBIE get deleted, especially given that there seems to be so much good faith here, and having had such trouble myself when I first started, there just does not seem to be enough here for anything remotely core or in-depth or specific to the park. If the indigenous aspect can be built up, I might be convinced to change my mind. Aoziwe (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I'm inclined not to encroach into foreign language Wikipedias. From what I can tell with the assistance of a translator extension, that article was created by an automated bot. Being that was the case, and no such thing for article creation exists on the English Wikipedia, what I know of their guidelines clearly isn't enough for me to propose deletion. Most foreign language Wikipedias act independently of one another, as even the guidelines after all are all just one big agreed-upon consensus between editors. I am not familiar with the history of that article or the bot that seemingly created it. — IVORK _Discuss 14:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Note. The Swedish Wikipedia article mentioned above is at sv:Bardon Park (park i Australien, Western Australia). The same bot that created that article also created one for sv:Bardon Park (park i Australien, New South Wales). That's a real neighborhood park in Coogee, New South Wales [2], but I don't see anything in either of these Swedish articles that suggests that either of these parks is notable under English Wikipedia standards. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Maylands, Western Australia. There's really no need to delete all of this newbie's work.--Pontificalibus (talk) 09:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for now, to revisit in six months or one year. Or at worst merge, possibly into
  List of national parks in Australia. --doncram 17:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note there are sources about community involvement in the park, from relatively local news sources and blogs, but I think these add up and suffice. For example:

• blog review/description of the park
• I added that "Nearby residents concerned about the park incorporated the Bardon Park Riverside Restoration Group to address weeds in 2016. The park has been managed by the City of Bayswater since 2006." based on |title=Residents to tackle Bardon Park weeds themselves, of 11 October 2016
• I added that: "A nature playground was developed for $175,000 and opened in March 2016. The playground features a rock garden which illustrates 'the six Noongar seasons of Birak - the first summer, Bunuru - the second summer, Djeran - autumn, Makuru - the first rains, Djilba - the second rains and Kambarang - flowering.'", based on the City of Bayswater's facebook posting about it: [3].

I think this stuff adds up. What is needed is some helpful development, not eradication of good faith new contributor's work. --doncram 17:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. we have normally kept all substantial city parks as geographic features, and the references are good enough for that. DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, meets
  WP:GNG, re sources discussed throughout this afd, a "Parks" section in the Maylands, Western Australia article would also be useful. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Weak Delete, I'm not sure that this is a "substantial city park", to quote DDG. If this were Central Park or Hyde Park then definitely, but I'm not convinced this is anything more than an ordinary suburban park, and none of the sources shown or arguments presented have convinced me otherwise. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 22:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]
• Weak keep - This seems to have been covered in multiple
  reliable sources. Although there aren't too many, I think that there are enough to verify the contents of the article. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 20:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete just a small city park with no indication of notability. I was easily convinced by reading this from one of the sources in the article: "would have to be one of the prettiest, albeit least-known of our riverside parklands. Relatively small in size, ..." It has some grass, a playground, some picnic tables (as do thousands of others). Just a
  WP:MILL park. MB 02:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep not sure this strictly meets GNG, but normally with geographical features we just need their existence to be proven, which in this article it has. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diablogato

Diablogato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable band, but the article does assert the importance or significance of the subject, so no (A7). I find 30 ghits, most not even related to the band, offering no significant coverage whatsoever; a few mentions here and there is all I can find. The two sources are unconvincing, as mere announcements.

• Delete - The band doesn't pass our
  notability criteria for music, as there are not enough reliable sources that discuss this band for at least a paragraph ([4] is an exception). RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 22:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 00:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 00:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete Just mentions. Fails GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 23:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Zachary

Erik Zachary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A bit too soon. Fails

• Delete a non-notable broadcast personality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:50, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails
  WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 01:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - nothing notable. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Krishna Subramanian (COO Komprise)

Krishna Subramanian (COO Komprise) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet

• Delete. I nominated the article on the firm for AfD, but missed this one. Neither he nor the firm have any indication of notability, and the simultaneous creation of the articles is good evidence that the contributor was an undeclared paid editor DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Effectively a CV page by a probably connected contributor. A sequence of jobs is described, and some in-role mentions relative to her current and a former company can be found, but nothing to indicate that the subject is of
  encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete glorified CV, doesn't meet
  WP:GNG. jcc (tea and biscuits) 13:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Video Clips 2

Video Clips 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no references and barely any content. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  08:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Although she is very popular, her albums haven't received much written commentary – besides confirming the its existence, there is no significant discussion of the album in RS. Doesn't meet
  WP:NALBUM: there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore there isn't "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." —Ojorojo (talk) 16:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Who (film)

Who (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See

The release date as stated is December 6. So, it's informational rather than promotional. Dynamic80 (talk) 04:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alts:

WP:INDAFD: Ajay Devaloka Shine Tom Chacko Shruthy Menon

• Keep per a project which has begun filming and is receiving coverage to meet
  WP:NFF. IE: Times of India is in-depth SIGCOV. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory Magie

Gregory Magie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - 33 G-hits for NAME + "composer" for this music professor and director. Let's call this one WP:TOOSOON. Carrite (talk) 01:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete conducting non-notable organizations, so he is not notable for conducting. Composing is also not at a notable level.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shamsun Nahar Khan

Shamsun Nahar Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An associate professor of pharmaceutical science, whose name is on 35+ journal articles, although never as lead author. The most cited of those articles, according to Google Scholar, has been cited 72 times. Four have been cited at least 35 times each. In some fields that would be excellent, but is modest, I believe, for pharmaceutical chemistry. It's an order of magnitude below the citation figures for the lead authors on some of those articles, such as Atta-ur-Rahman (chemist)[5] and Muhammad Iqbal Choudhary[6]. Her list of scholarships, fellowships, and awards is better than none, but not highly prestigious.

The cited sources are the university where she teaches and a blog self-published by a third party (so not a reliable source for facts about her), plus two sources that appear irrelevant - they don't mention her. A relatively junior academic, who at this time does not meet

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 21:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 21:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Fails
  WP:GNG.  FITINDIA  03:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not pass
  WP:GNG. Altaf (talk) 09:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gettingtough – The Race

Gettingtough – The Race (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources and probably fails on

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 00:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 00:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 00:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete can't find GNG-meeting coverage, reads like a business listing. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Team Uttejit

Team Uttejit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable racing team. I haven't managed to find any reliable third-party sources using Google. –barakokula31 (talk) 17:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, a university club or society that certainly doesn't meet the
  WP:GNG requirements. Ajf773 (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: The single listing from a contest does not demonstrate encyclopaedic notability for this society, nor are searches, including Indian media searches, finding anything better. Fails
  WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Despite L3X1's mistaken impression that canoes are rowed (they're paddled), there's clear consensus to delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Shaw (canoeist)

Jonathan Shaw (canoeist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - this is a brief article about a canoeist who retired in 2012. The article appears to have been created by the canoeist himself. Vorbee (talk) 14:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non notable boat rower. z'L3X1 (distænt write) 23:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teodore Acosta

Teodore Acosta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Fails the general and subject-specific notability criteria. — Zawl 16:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. None of his works appear notable.
  π, ν) 23:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete GNG, I found sources instead on a Spanish mayor and an Arizona DUI convict. L3X1 (distænt write) 23:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Locrian

EPIDSM Locrian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per
  π, ν) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Phrygian

EPIDSM Phrygian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per
  π, ν) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Dorian

EPIDSM Dorian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per
  π, ν) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Aeolian

EPIDSM Aeolian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per
  π, ν) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Lydian

EPIDSM Lydian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see -Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per
  π, ν) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Mixolydian

EPIDSM Mixolydian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per
  π, ν) 22:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nausch Hogan & Murray

Nausch Hogan & Murray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - it appears that this article does not include any significant sources or coverage from third-parties (in addition, most of the external links provided in the article appear to be broken). In my opinion, this article does not meet Wikipedia's
  general notability requirements. Name goes here (talk | contribs) 03:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. I am unable to find coverage to show that this meets
  WP:COMPANY.  gongshow  talk  08:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Eve Dallas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article covers a non-notable fictional character. There does not appear to be enough coverage on this character from reliable, third-party sources to justify the character having her own article. While doing a search for resources, all I could find were blogs discussing the characters and promotional information on the novels. All of the information about this character could be covered in the article on the parent series (