First Macedonian War
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
First Macedonian War | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Macedonian Wars and Second Punic War | |||||||
![]() The Mediterranean in 218 BC | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Roman Republic Aetolian League Illyrians Dardania Pergamon Sparta Elis Messenia |
Macedonia Achaean League | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Marcus Valerius Laevinus Scerdilaidas Attalus I Machanidas † Longarus |
Philip V of Macedon Philopoemen Demetrius of Pharos † |
The First Macedonian War (214–205 BC) was fought by Rome, allied (after 211 BC) with the Aetolian League and Attalus I of Pergamon, against Philip V of Macedon, contemporaneously with the Second Punic War (218–201 BC) against Carthage. There were no decisive engagements, and the war ended in a stalemate.
During the war,
Demetrius urges war against Rome
Rome's preoccupation with its war against Carthage provided an opportunity for Philip V of Macedon to attempt to extend his power westward. According to the ancient Greek historian Polybius, an important factor in Philip's decision to take advantage of this opportunity was the influence of Demetrius of Pharos.
After the First Illyrian War (229–228 BC) the Romans had made Demetrius ruler of most of coastal Illyria.[1] In the decade after the war he turned against the Romans attacking their allies in Illyria and raiding their trade vessels. In 219 BC, during the Second Illyrian War he was defeated by the Romans and fled to the court of king Philip.[2]
Involved in a war with the
For Greece is already entirely obedient to you, and will remain so: the Achaeans from genuine affection; the Aetolians from the terror which their disasters in the present war have inspired them. Italy, and your crossing into it, is the first step in the acquirement of universal empire, to which no one has a better claim than yourself. And now is the moment to act when the Romans have suffered a reverse.[3]
According to Polybius, Philip was easily persuaded.[4]
Philip makes peace with Aetolia
Philip at once began negotiations with the


The best thing of all is that the Greeks should not go to war with each other at all, but give the gods hearty thanks if by all speaking with one voice, and joining hands like people crossing a stream, they may be able to repel the attacks of barbarians and save themselves and their cities. But if this is altogether impossible, in the present juncture at least we ought to be unanimous and on our guard, when we see the bloated armaments and the vast proportions assumed by the war in the west. For even now it is evident to any one who pays even a moderate attention to public affairs, that whether the Carthaginians conquer the Romans, or the Romans the Carthaginians, it is in every way improbable that the victors will remain contented with the empire of Sicily and Italy. They will move forward: and will extend their forces and their designs farther than we could wish. Wherefore, I beseech you all to be on your guard against the danger of the crisis, and above all you, O King. You will do this, if you abandon the policy of weakening the Greeks, and thus rendering them an easy prey to the invader; and consult on the contrary for their good as you would for your own person, and have a care for all parts of Greece alike, as part and parcel of your own domains. If you act in this spirit, the Greeks will be your warm friends and faithful coadjutors in all your undertakings; while foreigners will be less ready to form designs against you, seeing with dismay the firm loyalty of the Greeks. If you are eager for action, turn your eyes to the west, and let your thoughts dwell upon the wars in Italy. Wait with coolness the turn of events there, and seize the opportunity to strike for universal dominion. Nor is the present crisis unfavourable for such a hope. But I intreat of you to postpone your controversies and wars with the Greeks to a time of greater tranquillity; and make it your supreme aim to retain the power of making peace or war with them at your own will. For if once you allow the clouds now gathering in the west to settle upon Greece, I fear exceedingly that the power of making peace or war, and in a word all these games which we are now playing against each other, will be so completely knocked out of the hands of us all, that we shall be praying heaven to grant us only this power of making war or peace with each other at our own will and pleasure, and of settling our own disputes.[7]
Philip builds a fleet
Philip spent the winter of 217–216 BC building a fleet of 100 warships and training men to row them and, according to Polybius, it was a practice that "hardly any Macedonian king had ever done before".[8] Macedon probably lacked the resources to build and maintain the kind of fleet necessary to match the Romans.[9] Polybius says that Philip had no "hope of fighting the Romans at sea",[8] perhaps referring to a lack of experience and training.
At any rate, Philip chose to build
Philip had in the meantime expanded his territories west along the
At the beginning of summer, Philip and his fleet left Macedon, sailed through the
However, as the Macedonian fleet neared the island of
Philip allies with Carthage
After hearing of Rome's disastrous defeat at the hands of Hannibal at
The treaty as set down by Polybius makes no mention of an invasion of Italy by Philip, the debacle at Sazan perhaps having soured Philip on such a venture,[15] something which in any case Hannibal may not have desired.[16]
On their way back to Macedon, Philip's emissaries, along with emissaries from Hannibal, were captured by Publius Valerius Flaccus, commander of the Roman fleet patrolling the southern Apulian coast. A letter from Hannibal to Philip and the terms of their agreement, were discovered.[17]
Philip's alliance with Carthage caused immediate dismay in Rome, hard-pressed as they already were. An additional twenty-five warships were at once outfitted and sent to join Flaccus' fleet of twenty-five warships already at
War breaks out in Illyria
In the late summer of 214 BC, Philip again attempted an Illyrian invasion by sea, with a fleet of 120 lembi. He captured
Meanwhile, the Romans had moved the fleet from Tarentum to
In the account given by Livy,[21] Laevinus, hearing that Apollonia was under siege, sent 2000 men under the command of Quintus Naevius Crista, to the mouth of the river. Avoiding Philip's army, Crista was able to enter the city by night unobserved. The following night, catching Philip's forces by surprise, he attacked and routed their camp. Escaping to his ships in the river, Philip made his way over the mountains and back to Macedonia, having burned his fleet and leaving behind many thousands of his men that had died or been taken prisoner, along with all of his armies' possessions. Meanwhile, Laevinus and his fleet wintered at Oricum.
Twice thwarted in his attempts at invasion of Illyria by sea, and now constrained by Laevinus' fleet in the
He was finally able to gain access to the Adriatic by capturing
Rome seeks allies in Greece
Desiring to prevent Philip from aiding Carthage in Italy and elsewhere, Rome sought out allies in Greece.
Laevinus had begun exploring the possibility of an alliance with the Aetolian League as early as 212 BC.[25] The war weary Aetolians had made peace with Philip at Naupactus in 217 BC. However, five years later the war faction was on the ascend and the Aetolians were once again considering taking up arms against their traditional enemy, Macedonia.
In 211 BC, an Aetolian assembly was convened for discussions with Rome. Laevinus pointed out the recent capture of Syracuse and Capua in the war against Carthage as evidence of Rome's rising fortunes and offered to ally with them against the Macedonians. A treaty was signed whereby the Aetolians would conduct operations on land, the Romans at sea and Rome would keep any slaves and other booty taken and Aetolia would receive control of any territory acquired. Another provision of the treaty allowed for the inclusion of certain allies of the League: Elis, Sparta, Messenia and Attalus I of Pergamon, as well as two Roman clients, the Illyrians Pleuratus and Scerdilaidas.[26]
Campaign in Greece
Later that summer, Laevinus seized the main town of
Upon hearing of the Roman alliance with Aetolia, Philip's first action was to secure his northern borders. He conducted raids in Illyria at Oricum and Apollonia and seized the frontier town of Sintia in
No sooner had Philip arrived there when he received an urgent plea for help from his ally the Acarnanians. Scopas the Aetolian strategos (general) had mobilized the Aetolian army and was preparing to invade Acarnania. Desperate and overmatched, but determined to resist, the Acarnanians sent their women, children and old men to seek refuge in Epirus and the rest marched to the frontier, having sworn an oath to fight to the death, "invoking a terrible curse" upon any who were forsworn. Hearing of the Acarnanians' grim determination, the Aetolians hesitated then, learning of Philip's approach, finally abandoned their invasion, after which Philip retired to Pella for the winter.[28]
In the spring of 210 BC, Laevinus again sailed from Corcyra with his fleet and, together with the Aetolians, captured
Although there was some fear of Rome and concern with her methods,[30] the coalition arrayed against Philip continued to grow. As allowed for by the treaty, Pergamon, Elis and Messenia, followed by Sparta, all agreed to join the alliance against Macedon.[31] The Roman fleet, together with the Pergamene fleet, controlled the sea, and Macedon and her allies were threatened on land by the rest of the coalition. The Roman strategy of encumbering Philip with a war among Greeks in Greece was succeeding, so much so that when Laevinus went to Rome to take up his consulship, he was able to report that the legion deployed against Philip could be safely withdrawn.[32]
However, the Eleans, Messenians and Spartans remained passive throughout 210 BC and Philip continued to make advances. He invested and took Echinus, using extensive siegeworks, having beaten back an attempt to relieve the town by the Aetolian
In the spring of 209 BC, Philip received requests for help from his ally the
Attempt at peace fails
From Lamia, Philip went to Phalara where he met representatives from the neutral states of
Philip marched to Chalcis in Euboea, which he garrisoned to block Attalus' landing there, then continued on to Aegium for the conference. The conference was interrupted by a report that Attalus had arrived at Aegina and the Roman fleet was at Naupactus. The Aetolian representatives, emboldened by these events, at once demanded that Philip return Pylos to the Messenians, Atintania to Rome and the Ardiaei to Scerdilaidas and Pleuratus. "Indignant", Philip quit the negotiations telling the assembly that they "might bear him witness that whilst he was seeking a basis for peace, the other side were determined to find a pretext for war".[36]
Hostilities resume
From Naupactus, Sulpicius sailed east to Corinth and Sicyon, conducting raids there. Philip, with his cavalry, caught the Romans ashore and was able to drive them back to their ships, with the Romans returning to Naupactus.
Philip then joined
Meanwhile, Sulpicius sailed round into the Aegean and joined Attalus on Aegina for the winter.[39] In 208 BC, the combined fleet of thirty-five Pergamene and twenty-five Roman ships failed to take Lemnos, but occupied and plundered the countryside of the island of Peparethos (Skopelos), both Macedonian possessions.[40]
Attalus and Sulpicius then attended a meeting in Heraclea Trachinia of the Council of the Aetolians, which included representatives from Egypt and Rhodes, who were continuing to try to arrange a peace. Learning of the conference and the presence of Attalus, Philip marched rapidly south in an attempt to break up the conference and catch the enemy leaders, but arrived too late.[41]
Surrounded by foes, Philip was forced to adopt a defensive policy.[42] He distributed his commanders and forces and set up a system of beacon fires at various high places to communicate instantly any enemy movements.
After leaving Heraclea, Attalus and Sulpicius sacked both Oreus on the northern coast of Euboea, and Opus, the chief city of eastern Locris.[43] The spoils from Oreus had been reserved for Sulpicius, who returned there, while Attalus stayed to collect the spoils from Opus. However, with their forces divided, Philip, alerted by signal fire, attacked and took Opus. Attalus, caught by surprise, was barely able to escape to his ships.
The war ends
Although Philip considered Attalus' escape a bitter defeat,
The neutral trading powers were still trying to arrange a peace and, at Elateia, Philip met with the same would-be peacemakers from Egypt and Rhodes who had been at the previous meeting in Heraclea, and again in the spring of 207 BC, but to no avail.[47] Representatives of Egypt, Rhodes, Byzantium, Chios, Mytilene and perhaps Athens also met again with the Aetolians that spring.[48] The war was going Philip's way, but the Aetolians, although now abandoned by both Pergamon and Rome, were not yet ready to make peace on Philip's terms. However, after another season of fighting, they finally relented. In 206 BC, and without Rome's consent, the Aetolians sued for a separate peace on conditions imposed by Philip.
The following spring
See also
Notes
- ^ Polybius, 2.11.
- ^ Polybius, 3.16, 3.18–19, 4.66.
- ^ Polybius, 5.101.
- ^ Polybius, 5.102.
- ^ Polybius, 5.103–-105.
- ^ Polybius, 5.103.
- ^ Polybius, 5.104. According to Walbank, p. 66, note 5, this speech, "nonwithstanding rhetorical elements … bears the mark of a true version based on contemporary record."
- ^ a b c Polybius, 5.109.
- ^ Walbank, p. 69; Polybius, 5.1, 5.95, 5.108.
- ^ Wilkes, p. 157; Polybius, 2.3.
- ^ Polybius, 5.108.
- ^ Walbank, p. 69.
- ^ Polybius, 5.110.
- ^ Polybius, 7.9.
- ^ According to Walbank, p. 71, note 1, the version of the treaty described in Livy, 23.33.9–12 which mention an Italian invasion by Philip, "are worthless annalistic fabrications".
- ^ Walbank, p. 69, note 3.
- ^ Livy, 23.34.
- ^ Livy, 23.38. Livy says that 20 ships were outfitted and, along with the five ships that transported the agents to Rome, were sent to join Flaccus' fleet of 25 ships. In the same passage he says that 30 ships left Ostia for Tarentum and talks about a combined fleet of 55. Walbank, p. 75, note 2, says that the 55 number given by Livy is a mistake, citing "Holleaux, 187, n. 1."
- ^ Walbank, p. 75; Livy, 24.40.
- ^ Livy, 24.10–11, 20.
- ^ Livy, 24.40. Livy's account is suspect, see Walbank, p. 76, note 1.
- ISBN 978-1-4051-6072-8.
- ^ Polybius, 8.15–16.
- ^ Livy, 24.13, 25.23.
- ^ Walbank, p. 82; Livy, 25.30, 26.24.
- ^ Livy, 26.24. According to Walbank, p. 84, note 2, "Livy accidentally omits Messenia and erroneously describes Pleuratus as king of Thrace."
- ^ Livy, 26.24.
- ^ Livy, 26.25; Polybius, 9.40.
- ^ Livy, 26.26; Polybius, 9.39. Livy says that Anticyra was Locrian, but modern scholars disagree, see Walbank, p. 87, note 2.
- ^ Polybius, 9.37–39, 10.15.
- ^ Polybius, 9,30.
- ^ Livy, 26.28.
- ^ Polybius, 9.41–42.
- ^ Livy, 27.29.
- ^ Walbank, p. 89–90.
- ^ Livy, 27.30.
- ^ Livy, 27.31.
- ^ Livy, 27.32.
- ^ Livy, 27.33.
- ^ Livy, 28.5.
- ^ Polybius, 10.42; Livy, 28.5.
- ^ Polybius, 10.41; Livy, 28.5.
- ^ Livy, 28.6.
- ^ Polybius, 11.7; Livy, 28.7.
- ^ Livy, 28.7; Walbank, p. 96.
- ^ Livy, 28.8.
- ^ Livy, 28.7.
- ^ Polybius, 11.4.
- ^ According to Walbank, p. 102, note 2, Livy, 29.12 "is spoilt by annalistic contamination, which, in the interests of Roman policy, tries to run the Aetolian peace and the return of the Romans as closely together as possible".
- ^ Livy, 29.12.
References
- Hansen, Esther V., The Attalids of Pergamon, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press; London: Cornell University Press Ltd (1971). ISBN 0-8014-0615-3.
- Kleu, Michael. Die Seepolitik Philipps V. von Makedonien. Bochum, Verlag Dr. Dieter Winkler, 2015.
- Livy, From the Founding of the City, Rev. Canon Roberts (translator), Ernest Rhys (Ed.); (1905) London: J. M. Dent & Sons, Ltd.
- Evelyn S. Shuckburgh(translator); London, New York. Macmillan (1889); Reprint Bloomington (1962).
- Walbank, F. W. (1940), Philip V of Macedon.
- Wilkes, John, The Illyrians, Blackwell Publishers (December 1, 1995). ISBN 0-631-19807-5.