Struggle session

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Struggle session
Lhasa IPA
tʰʌ́msiŋ

Struggle sessions (

Maoist China where people accused of being "class enemies" were publicly humiliated, accused, beaten and tortured, sometimes by people with whom they were close.[3][4][5][6] These public rallies were most popular in the mass campaigns immediately before and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China, and later during the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976), with an aim to instill a crusading spirit among the crowd to promote the Maoist thought reform.[3][4][7][8]

Struggle sessions were usually conducted at the workplace, classrooms and auditoriums, where "students were pitted against their teachers, friends and spouses were pressured to betray one another, [and] children were manipulated into exposing their parents".[6][9][10] Staging, scripts and agitators were prearranged by the Maoists to incite crowd support.[5][9][10] In particular, the denunciation of prominent "class enemies" was often conducted in public squares and marked by large crowds of people who surrounded the kneeling victim, raised their fists, and shouted accusations of misdeeds.[5][9][10][11]

Etymology

The expression comes from pīpàn (批判, 'to criticize and judge') and dòuzhēng (鬥爭, 'to fight and contest'), so the whole expression conveys the message of "inciting the spirit of judgment and fighting." Instead of saying the full phrase pīpàn dòuzhēng, it was shortened to pīdòu (批鬥).

class struggle; the session is held, ostensibly, to benefit the target, by eliminating all traces of counterrevolutionary, reactionary thinking.[9][10]

History

Origins and development

A struggle session of a landlord, during the Land Reform Movement (1946).

Struggle sessions developed from similar ideas of criticism and

self-criticism in the Soviet Union from the 1920s. Chinese communists resisted this at first, as struggle sessions conflicted with the Chinese concept of "saving face". However, these sessions became commonplace at Chinese Communist Party (CCP) meetings during the 1930s due to public popularity.[12]

Struggle sessions emerged in China as a tactic to secure the allegiance of the Chinese people during the Land Reform Movement (which ended in 1953).[13] That campaign sought to mobilize the masses through intensive propaganda followed by "speak bitterness" sessions (訴苦, sùkǔ, 'give utterance to grief') in which peasants were encouraged to accuse land owners.[14][15]

The strongest accusations in the speak bitterness sessions were incorporated into scripted and stage-managed public mass accusation meetings (控訴大會, kòngsù dàhuì). Cadres then cemented the peasants' loyalty by inducing them to actively participate in violent acts against landowners. Later struggle sessions were adapted to use outside the CCP as a means of consolidating control of areas under its jurisdiction.[16][17][18]

Cultural Revolution

A struggle session of Xi Zhongxun, the father of Xi Jinping, at Northwest A&F University during the Cultural Revolution (September 1967).[19] The banner reads "Anti-Party element Xi Zhongxun".

During the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976), struggle sessions were widely conducted by the Red Guards across mainland China.[3][4][9][10] In the early phase of the revolution (e.g., the "Red August"), mass violence spread over campuses, where teachers and other educators were abusively subjected to frequent struggle sessions, humiliated, and beaten by Red Guards who were their students.[3][4][20] Top officials in the country such as Liu Shaoqi, Peng Dehuai, Tao Zhu were "struggled against" (subjected to "struggle sessions") and persecuted to death during the revolution.[1][2][21][22] According to one source of the classified official statistics, nearly 2 million Chinese were killed and another 125 million were either persecuted or "struggled against" during the Cultural Revolution.[3]

After the Cultural Revolution, struggle sessions were disowned in China starting from the

class struggle" to "economic construction".[25][26]

Gallery

Academic studies

Purposes

A set of porcelain figurine of a struggle session

Frederick T. C. Yu identified three categories of mass campaigns employed by the CCP in the years before and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC):[28]

  • Economic campaigns sought to improve conditions, often by increasing production in particular sectors of the economy.
  • Ideological campaigns sought to change people's thinking and behaviour.
  • Struggle sessions were similar to ideological campaigns, but "their focus is on the elimination of the power base and/or class position of enemy classes or groups."[29]

The process of struggle sessions served multiple purposes. First, it demonstrated to the masses that the party was determined to subdue any opposition (generally labeled “class enemies”), by violence if necessary. Second, potential rivals were crushed. Third, those who attacked the targeted foes became complicit in the violence and hence invested in the state. All three served to consolidate the party's control, which was deemed necessary because party members constituted a small minority of China's population.[16][17][18]

Both accusation meetings and mass trials were largely propaganda tools to accomplish the party's aims.

Freie Universität Berlin
, wrote:

Carefully arranged and organized, the mass trials and accusatory meetings followed clear and meticulously prearranged patterns. Dramatic devices such as staging, props, working scripts, agitators, and climactic moments were used to efficiently engage the emotions of the audience—to stir up resentment against the targeted groups and mobilize the audience to support the regime.[30][31]

dénouement of a show that had been many weeks in preparation".[32]

Accounts

Anne F. Thurston, in Enemies of the People, gave a description of a struggle session for the professor You Xiaoli: "I had many feelings at that struggle session. I thought there were some bad people in the audience. But I also thought there were many ignorant people, people who did not understand what was happening, so I pitied that kind of person. They brought workers and peasants into the meetings, and they could not understand what was happening. But I was also angry."[33]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Liu Shaoqi (1898-1969)". Chinese University of Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 2018-06-04.
  2. ^ a b Ramzy, Austin (2016-05-14). "China's Cultural Revolution, Explained". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2024-01-14.
  3. ^ a b c d e Song, Yongyi (August 25, 2011). "Chronology of Mass Killings during the Chinese Cultural Revolution (1966–1976)". Sciences Po. Archived from the original on 2024-01-14. Retrieved December 27, 2019.
  4. ^
    The University of Chicago. Archived
    (PDF) from the original on 2020-04-17.
  5. ^ a b c Sullivan, Lawrence R. (2011). "Struggle sessions". Historical Dictionary of the Chinese Communist Party. p. 390.
  6. ^ a b Lu, Xing (2004). "Denunciation rallies". Rhetoric of the Chinese Cultural Revolution: The Impact on Chinese Thought, Culture, and Communication. pp. 140–141.
  7. .
  8. ^ Fang, Jucheng; Jiang, Guinong. "第九章 颠倒乾坤的"文化大革命"" [Chapter 9 The "Cultural Revolution" that turned everything upside down]. People's Net (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2007-02-21. Retrieved 2021-04-18.
  9. ^
    The University of Chicago
    .
  10. ^
    The University of Chicago
    .
  11. OCLC 18950000
    .
  12. .
  13. .
  14. .
  15. .
  16. ^ .
  17. ^ .
  18. ^ .
  19. .
  20. (PDF) from the original on 2016-10-12.
  21. .
  22. ^ Shen, Xiaoyun (2016). "The Sudden Rise and Fall of Tao Zhu, The "Number 4 in Command" in the Cultural Revolution". Modern China Studies (2).
  23. .
  24. on 2008-05-11.
  25. ^ "50 flashbacks signal reform (I)". China Internet Information Center. 2014-10-15. Archived from the original on 2021-11-15. Retrieved 2020-04-29.
  26. ^ Yu, Guangren. "Dèng Xiǎopíng de qiúshí yù fǎnsī jīngshén" 邓小平的求实与反思精神. Yanhuang Chunqiu (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2020-05-07. Retrieved 2020-04-29.
  27. .
  28. .
  29. . (Summarization of Yu’s categories.)
  30. .
  31. ^ Also, Strauss, Julia (December 2006). "Morality, Coercion and State Building by Campaign in the Early PRC: Regime Consolidation and After, 1949-1956" (PDF). The China Quarterly. No. 188. pp. 906–908.
  32. OCLC 690379541
    .
  33. ^ "Enemies of the People". World and ischool. June 1987. Archived from the original on 2007-09-30. Retrieved 2011-03-07.