Template talk:Member states of the European Union
European Union Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 30 August 2013. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
Comments
The introducing of the flag at the right just looks ugly. I remove it. Aaker 22:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Edit request
{{
- adds a <includeonly> so the template is expanded on its own page;
- converts the above line into below (suggest template's balance then improved);
- uses linewrapping that works more reliably with Firefox as well as other browsers (and reduces the relatively wide gap between the list of links' wrapped lines).
Please also update
[[Category:European Union navigational boxes|{{PAGENAME}}]]
to [[Category:European Union templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
.
Thank you. Sardanaphalus (talk) 00:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Please remove
Merger
See discussion:
Remove lists
{{
Remove the Member "states by accession" and "by population" from this template. Neither links to a list. The population list I redirected to the Member state list, which has all the same information plus more, with better updates. The accession redirects to Enlargement of the European Union, which is a more detailed article but, as far as lists go, it's not as good as the main one. Remember that lists are sortable now, so a lot of "List of A sorted by X/Y/Z" lists can be merged into a single "List of A" with sortable columns. jnestorius(talk) 18:17, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- ADMIN, Please remove the Member states by accession link and by population link. Thanks.- J.Logan`t: 13:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Visual update
Hi, I've been standardizing the EU templates with the European colours, flags, and a clearer layout, as can be seen in Template:European Union topics and all other EU templates, bar Parliamentary templates. Could someone do this same with this template? Thanks, YeshuaDavid • Talk • 20:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- I have reverted your edits. The standard colours should be used and flags violate ]
Move request + protection needed?
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. See
]- Support. The parenthetical acronym seems particularly unnecessary in the name of this template, and I agree that "member states" is more precise. ╠╣uw [talk] 15:18, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support; the " (EU)" on the end seems bizarre and pointless. bobrayner (talk) 17:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2016
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
remove or write uk as a former member of the european union