Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Snickers2686

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Instructions

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' copyright violations in CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at

Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations
to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

  • {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

  • Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
  • If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
  • Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place {{subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • After examining an article:

Background

Snickers2686 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

John Gibbs (US government official) was tagged at copypatrol as a violation of https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/08/politics/kfile-john-gibbs-hud/index.html ; concerningly, the user has 60,000 edits and two previous warnings from Diannaa, along with some unattributed Public Domain copying notices. Looking further into their contribs, I found Melanie L. Cradle and José A. Suarez, both of which copied from https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2020/07-2020/Governor-Lamont-Makes-Supreme-and-Appellate-Court-Appointments , which has no indication of being in the public domain; I blocked, and started filling out this investigation. Fortunately, all violations appear to come from easily accesable online sources, and this seems to be more of a case of not understanding what's in public domain and what isn't. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 22:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note that a good deal of stuff here is non copyrightable. The hard part of this CCI is the length. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 17:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution survey

Subpages:

Snickers2686

Pages 1 through 20

Pages 21 through 40

Pages 41 through 60

Pages 61 through 80

Pages 81 through 100

Pages 101 through 120

Pages 121 through 140

Pages 141 through 160

Pages 161 through 180

Pages 181 through 200

Pages 201 through 220

Pages 221 through 240

Pages 241 through 260

Pages 261 through 280

Pages 281 through 300

Pages 301 through 320

Pages 321 through 340

Pages 341 through 360

Pages 361 through 380

Pages 381 through 400

Pages 401 through 420

Pages 421 through 440

Pages 441 through 460

Pages 461 through 480

Pages 481 through 500

Pages 501 through 520

Pages 521 through 540

Pages 541 through 560

Pages 561 through 580

Pages 581 through 600

Pages 601 through 620

Pages 621 through 640

Pages 641 through 660

Pages 661 through 680

Pages 681 through 700

Pages 701 through 720

Pages 721 through 740

All clear. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pages 741 through 760

Pages 761 through 780

Pages 781 through 800

Pages 801 through 820

Pages 821 through 840

Pages 841 through 860

Pages 861 through 880

Pages 881 through 900

Pages 901 through 920

Pages 921 through 940

All done. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pages 941 through 960

Pages 961 through 980

Pages 981 through 1000

This report generated by ContributionSurveyor.java at 2020-07-22T10:03:40.359226Z.