Spatial politics

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Spatial politics" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article may document a more reliable sources to establish its current use and the impact the term has had on its field. Otherwise consider renaming or deleting the article. (April 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message ) The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (May 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Spatial politics refers to the use of spatial terms to simplify and dramatize political differences and actions.

Thus left-wing politics oppose right-wing politics -- after the seating habits on the left and right sides of French assemblies in the late 18th century.

Also from France comes the political grouping known as The Mountain - originally the occupants of higher seats in a chamber.

The British

tradition of parliamentary debate involves rows of benches facing each other in a confrontational manner. Some see this as discouraging consensus and compromise.

While the opposing

of each faction.

Members falling out with their fellows on some issue cross the floor to vote with their erstwhile political enemies.

Note that some modern parliaments, such as the German Bundestag, attempt to de-polarise extremes by seating arrangements.

Church politics sometimes employ a different spatial paradigm:

.