Tachyon
Classification | Elementary particle |
---|---|
Status | Hypothetical |
Theorized | 1967 |
A tachyon (
In the 1967 paper that coined the term,
The term comes from the
History
The term tachyon was coined by Gerald Feinberg in a 1967 paper titled "Possibility of faster-than-light particles".[3] He had been inspired by the science-fiction story "Beep" by James Blish.[6] Feinberg studied the kinematics of such particles according to special relativity. In his paper, he also introduced fields with imaginary mass (now also referred to as tachyons) in an attempt to understand the microphysical origin such particles might have.
The first hypothesis regarding faster-than-light particles is sometimes attributed to physicist Arnold Sommerfeld, who, in 1904, named them "meta-particles".[7][8] Bilanuik, Deshpande and Sudarshan discussed this more recently in their 1962 paper on the topic[9] and in 1969.[10]
The possibility of existence of faster-than-light particles was also proposed by Lev Yakovlevich Shtrum in 1923.[11]
In September 2011, it was reported, in a major release by CERN, that a tau neutrino had traveled faster than the speed of light; however, later updates from CERN on the OPERA experiment indicate that the faster-than-light readings were due to a faulty element of the experiment's fibre optic timing system.[12]
Special relativity
In
Mass
In a
(where p is the relativistic
This equation shows that the total energy of a particle (bradyon or tachyon) contains a contribution from its rest mass (the "rest mass–energy") and a contribution from its motion, the kinetic energy. When (the particle's velocity) is larger than (the speed of light), the denominator in the equation for the energy is imaginary, as the value under the square root is negative. Because the total energy of the particle must be real (and not a complex or imaginary number) in order to have any practical meaning as a measurement, the numerator must also be imaginary (i.e. the rest mass m must be imaginary, as a pure imaginary number divided by another pure imaginary number is a real number).
In some modern formulations of the theory, the mass of tachyons is regarded as real.[13][14][15]
Speed
One curious effect is that, unlike ordinary particles, the speed of a tachyon increases as its energy decreases. In particular, approaches zero when approaches infinity. (For ordinary baryonic matter, increases with increasing speed, becoming arbitrarily large as approaches , the speed of light.) Therefore, just as bradyons are forbidden to break the light-speed barrier, so too are tachyons forbidden from slowing down to below c, because infinite energy is required to reach the barrier from either above or below.
As noted by Albert Einstein, Tolman, and others, special relativity implies that faster-than-light particles, if they existed, could be used to communicate backwards in time.[16]
Neutrinos
In 1985, Chodos proposed that
Cherenkov radiation
A tachyon with an electric charge would lose energy as
Even an electrically neutral tachyon would be expected to lose energy via gravitational Cherenkov radiation (unless
Superluminal information
If tachyons can transmit information faster than light, then, according to relativity, they violate causality, leading to logical paradoxes of the
The problem can be understood in terms of the relativity of simultaneity in special relativity, which says that different inertial reference frames will disagree on whether two events at different locations happened "at the same time" or not, and they can also disagree on the order of the two events (technically, these disagreements occur when the spacetime interval between the events is 'space-like', meaning that neither event lies in the future light cone of the other).[24]
If one of the two events represents the sending of a signal from one location and the second event represents the reception of the same signal at another location, then, as long as the signal is moving at the speed of light or slower, the mathematics of simultaneity ensures that all reference frames agree that the transmission-event happened before the reception-event.[24] However, in the case of a hypothetical signal moving faster than light, there would always be some frames in which the signal was received before it was sent, so that the signal could be said to have moved backward in time. Because one of the two fundamental postulates of special relativity says that the laws of physics should work the same way in every inertial frame, if it is possible for signals to move backward in time in any one frame, it must be possible in all frames. This means that if observer A sends a signal to observer B which moves faster than light in A's frame but backwards in time in B's frame, and then B sends a reply which moves faster than light in B's frame but backwards in time in A's frame, it could work out that A receives the reply before sending the original signal, challenging causality in every frame and opening the door to severe logical paradoxes.[25] This is known as the tachyonic antitelephone.
Reinterpretation principle
The reinterpretation principle[3][9][25] asserts that a tachyon sent back in time can always be reinterpreted as a tachyon traveling forward in time, because observers cannot distinguish between the emission and absorption of tachyons. The attempt to detect a tachyon from the future (and violate causality) would actually create the same tachyon and send it forward in time (which is causal).
However, this principle is not widely accepted as resolving the paradoxes.[16][25][26] Instead, what would be required to avoid paradoxes is that, unlike any known particle, tachyons do not interact in any way and can never be detected or observed, because otherwise a tachyon beam could be modulated and used to create an anti-telephone[16] or a "logically pernicious self-inhibitor".[23] All forms of energy are believed to interact at least gravitationally, and many authors state that superluminal propagation in Lorentz invariant theories always leads to causal paradoxes.[27][28]
Fundamental models
In modern physics, all fundamental particles are regarded as excitations of quantum fields. There are several distinct ways in which tachyonic particles could be embedded into a field theory.
Fields with imaginary mass
In the paper that coined the term "tachyon", Gerald Feinberg studied Lorentz invariant quantum fields with imaginary mass.[3] Because the group velocity for such a field is superluminal, naively it appears that its excitations propagate faster than light. However, it was quickly understood that the superluminal group velocity does not correspond to the speed of propagation of any localized excitation (like a particle). Instead, the negative mass represents an instability to tachyon condensation, and all excitations of the field propagate subluminally and are consistent with causality.[29] Despite having no faster-than-light propagation, such fields are referred to simply as "tachyons" in many sources.[5][30][31][32][2]
Tachyonic fields play an important role in modern physics. Perhaps the most famous is the
Tachyons are predicted by bosonic string theory and also the Neveu-Schwarz (NS) and NS-NS sectors, which are respectively the open bosonic sector and closed bosonic sector, of RNS superstring theory prior to the GSO projection. However such tachyons are not possible due to the Sen conjecture, also known as tachyon condensation. This resulted in the necessity for the GSO projection.
Lorentz-violating theories
In theories that do not respect
Fields with non-canonical kinetic term
By modifying the kinetic energy of the field, it is possible to produce Lorentz invariant field theories with excitations that propagate superluminally.[29][28] However, such theories, in general, do not have a well-defined Cauchy problem (for reasons related to the issues of causality discussed above), and are probably inconsistent quantum mechanically.
In fiction
Tachyons have appeared in many works of fiction. They have been used as a standby mechanism upon which many science fiction authors rely to establish faster-than-light communication, with or without reference to causality issues. The word tachyon has become widely recognized to such an extent that it can impart a science-fictional connotation even if the subject in question has no particular relation to superluminal travel (a form of technobabble, akin to positronic brain).[36]
See also
- Lorentz-violating neutrino oscillations
- Massive particle – bradyon, aka tardyon
- Massless particle – luxon
- Retrocausality
- Tachyonic antitelephone
- Virtual particle
- Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory
References
- ^ a b
Tipler, Paul A.; Llewellyn, Ralph A. (2008). Modern Physics (5th ed.). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman & Co. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-7167-7550-8.
... so existence of particles v > c ... Called tachyons ... would present relativity with serious ... problems of infinite creation energies and causality paradoxes.
- ^ ISBN 9780060531089.
People initially thought of tachyons as particles traveling faster than the speed of light ... But we now know that a tachyon indicates an instability in a theory that contains it. Regrettably, for science fiction fans, tachyons are not real physical particles that appear in nature.
- ^ a b c d e f
Feinberg, G. (1967). "Possibility of faster-than-light particles". .
Feinberg, G. (1978). "[no title cited]". . - ^ Aharonov, Y.; Komar, A.; Susskind, L. (25 June 1969). "Superluminal behavior, causality, and instability". Physical Review. 182 (5): 1400–1403. .
- ^ a b
Sen, Ashoke (2002). "Rolling tachyon". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2002 (4): 048. S2CID 12023565.
- ^
Benford, Gregory (6 July 2013). Old Legends. p. 276.
He told me years later that he had begun thinking about tachyons because he was inspired by James Blish's [1954] short story, "Beep". In it, a faster-than-light communicator plays a crucial role in a future society but has an annoying final beep at the end of every message. The communicator necessarily allows sending of signals backward in time, even when that's not your intention. Eventually, the characters discover that all future messages are compressed into that beep, so the future is known, more or less by accident. Feinberg had set out to see if such a gadget was theoretically possible.
- ^ Sommerfeld, A. (1904). "Simplified Deduction of the Field and the Forces of an Electron Moving in Any Given Way". KNKL. Acad. Wetensch. 7: 345–367.
- arXiv:quant-ph/0103143.
- ^ a b Bilaniuk, O.-M.P.; Deshpande, V.K.; Sudarshan, E.C.G. (1962). "'Meta' Relativity". .
- ^ Bilaniuk, O.-M.P.; Sudarshan, E.C.G. (1969). "Particles beyond the Light Barrier". .
- ISSN 2624-8174.
- ^ "Neutrinos Sent from CERN to Gran Sasso Respect the Cosmic Speed Limit" (Press release). CERN. 8 June 2012. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 8 June 2012.
- ^ a b
Recami, E. (16 October 2007). "Classical tachyons and possible applications". Rivista del Nuovo Cimento. 9 (6): 1–178. S2CID 120041976.
- ^ a b
Vieira, R. S. (2011). "An introduction to the theory of tachyons". Rev. Bras. Ens. Fis. 34 (3). Bibcode:2011arXiv1112.4187V.
- ^ a b
Hill, James M.; Cox, Barry J. (8 December 2012). "Einstein's special relativity beyond the speed of light". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 468 (2148): 4174–4192. ISSN 1364-5021.
- ^ a b c d .
- ^
Chodos, A. (1985). "The neutrino as a tachyon". hdl:2022/20737.
- ^
Colladay, D.; Kostelecky, V.A. (1997). "CPT Violation and the Standard Model". S2CID 7651433.
- ^
Colladay, D.; Kostelecky, V. A. (1998). "Lorentz-Violating Extension of the Standard Model". S2CID 4013391.
- ^
Kostelecky, V. A. (2004). "Gravity, Lorentz Violation, and the Standard Model". S2CID 55185765.
- ^ Hughes, Richard J.; Stephenson, G. J. (1990). "Against Tachyonic Neutrinos". Physics Letters B. 244 (1): 95–100. .
- ^
Cohen, Andrew G. & Glashow, Sheldon L. (2011). "Pair creation constrains superluminal neutrino propagation". Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (18): 181803. S2CID 56198539.
- ^ a b
Fitzgerald, P. (1970). "Tachyons, backwards causation, and freedom". Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association vol. 1970. The Philosophy of Science Association, 1970 Biennial Meeting. PSA. Vol. 1970. pp. 425–426.
A more powerful argument to show that retrocausal tachyons involve an intolerable conceptual difficulty is illustrated by the 'Case of the Logically Pernicious Self-Inhibitor' ...
- ^ a b Jarrell, Mark. "The Special Theory of Relativity" (PDF). Electrodynamics course, chapter 11. University of Cincinnati. pp. 7–11. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 September 2006. Retrieved 27 October 2006.
- ^ a b c
Grøn, Ø.; Hervik, S. (2007). Einstein's General Theory of Relativity: With Modern Applications in Cosmology. ISBN 978-0-387-69199-2.
The tachyon telephone paradox cannot be resolved by means of the reinterpretation principle.
- ^
Recami, Erasmo; Fontana, Flavio; Garavaglia, Roberto (2000). "Special Relativity and Superluminal Motions: A Discussion of Some Recent Experiments". International Journal of Modern Physics A. 15 (18): 2793–2812. .
it is possible ... to solve also the known causal paradoxes, devised for [refuting] 'faster than light' motion, although this is not widely recognized yet.
- ^ a b
Barceló, Carlos; Finazzi, Stefano; Liberati, Stefano (2010). "On the impossibility of superluminal travel: The warp drive lesson". ].
As a matter of fact, any mechanism for superluminal travel can be easily turned into a time machine and hence lead to the typical causality paradoxes ...
- ^ a b
S2CID 2956810.
- ^ a b Aharonov, Y.; Komar, A.; Susskind, L. (1969). "Superluminal Behavior, Causality, and Instability". Phys. Rev. 182 (5): 1400–1403. .
- ^ a b Greene, Brian (2000). The Elegant Universe. Vintage Books.
- ^
Kutasov, David; Mariño, Marcos; Moore, Gregory (2000). "Some exact results on tachyon condensation in string field theory". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2000 (10): 045. S2CID 15664546.
- ^
Gibbons, G.W. (13 June 2002). "Cosmological evolution of the rolling tachyon". Physics Letters B. 537 (1–2): 1–4. S2CID 119487619.
- ^
Polchinski, J. (1998). "String Theory". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 95 (19). Cambridge, UK: PMID 9736684.
- arXiv:hep-ph/0407087.
- ^
Coleman, Sidney R. & Glashow, Sheldon L. (1999). "High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance". S2CID 1273409.
- ^ Wagstaff, Keith (15 July 2018). "The Science Behind Star Trek Technobabble". Mashable. Retrieved 12 February 2021.
External links
- "The faster than light (FTL) FAQ". Iowa State University. Archived from the original on 21 November 2000.
- ScienceWorld.
- "Tachyons". Mathematics. Physics FAQ / Particle and Nuclear. Riverside, California: University of California.