Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 15

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< June 14 June 16 >

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closer statement: This was actually a time-consuming AFD to close as each article had to be handled individually. In future bundled nominations, please follow AFD guidelines on formatting additional articles so that closing the discussion takes care of not only the primary article but all other articles included in the nomination. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tyumen Oblast in the Turkvision Song Contest

Tyumen Oblast in the Turkvision Song Contest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am nominating the following pages, all because of
WP:ONESOURCE
)

Follow-up to:

Except for the websites turkvision.info, turkvizyon.tv etc. of the organisation Turkvision / Turkvizyon itself, or the various broadcasters of the event (

WP:RS
either. Some examples:

  • Gagauzia: govt website Gagauzia.md is invoked for the claim that an incentive of 10,000 Moldovan leu was given to get people to participate. Which is probably true, but the participant in question, Ludmila Tukan, failed to qualify... I'm not impressed.
  • Germany: aufrechtgehn.de/impressum/ is just a
    WP:PRIMARY
    source.
  • Khakassia: r-19.ru is the official website of the Government of the Republic of Khakassia. It is only invoked to confirm the name of the song of the 2020 Khakassian contestant, who ended in 11th place... I'm not impressed.
  • Northern Cyprus: kibrisgenctv.com is the local broadcaster of Turkvision, so a
    WP:PRIMARY
    source.
  • Poland: eurowizja.org is the website of the Association of Enthusiasts of the Eurovision Song Contest OGAE Polska. This may be a relevant source, it may even be a reliable source, and it is independent of Turkvision. (This is why I hesitated until today, 10 a.m. of 9 June, to include this Poland page in this AfD). But it is invoked only once to support 2 sentences about Polish participation in the 2020 (online) edition of Turkvision, and this is the only time the article Poland in the Turkvision Song Contest invokes any source other than Turkvision.info itself, or other than our great friend Anthony Granger from Eurovoix. What is the result of this whole page? A contestant from Poland tried to participate in the 2016 and 2017 editions (both of which were cancelled), and the only contestant who actually managed to participate in the 2020 edition came in at 18th place. I think this last bit, plus the eurowizja.org ref, can easily be mentioned in Turkvision Song Contest 2020. So the best option in this case may be more of a manual merge than an outright deletion, but there is a large number of stuff in this article that is probably not worth keeping, so I'm still including the page in this AfD.
  • Belarus: qanunpress.com deadlink. This newsoutlet was only established in 2015, the article dates from 12 December 2015, it's a deadlink, and there is no indication of any editorial review or policy other than that the General Director is Vidadi Gozalov. This is the only article in English Wikipedia that ever cites qanunpress.com, it is not mentioned by any other major news media. So I'm gonna count this as an unreliable source, and add Belarus to this AfD (noon 9 June).

From the Russia article, I would include one significant fact into the main article Turkvision Song Contest, namely that the Russian Ministry of Culture banned all Russian regions from competing in the 2015 contest because it was part of the TURKSOY organisation. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. As pointed out by the nominator, these articles fail on a number of points, including

WP:RS to support the continued hosting of these articles. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 07:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Observation (as nom) Several articles that appear to use more than just Anthony Granger of Eurovoix, Turkvision itself or its broadcasters, or questionable/perennial other sources, appear to be those on Azerbaijan. Indeed, sources with an .az domain name or otherwise written in Azerbaijani are sometimes found in other pages, such as the one on Belarus. This could mean that a single editor has been behind the creation of many if not all of these pages. xtools.wmcloud.org/pages shows, however, that one user created only 8 Turkvision-related pages (5 of which have been deleted so far, including one about Azerbaijan which I nomimated; the remaining 4 are all about Azerbaijan). But they also created lots of Eurovision pages, all except 1 have not been deleted so far. So there is no reason to hold bias against this person (who is actually one of the better editors in the field of song contests), and the pages must have been created by multiple people, even if they all rely pretty heavily on the same type of sources. I haven't included the last 4 pages on Azerbaijan for this reason yet, they might pass
    WP:GNG. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Comment on the future of Turkvision articles At the moment, I think the main articles
    WP:GNG. Any relevant information from the nominated articles may be manually merged into the articles which do pass general notability. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 12:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Comment on Turkvision's history and future in general It seems to me that the reason why Turkvision has not been able to become a successful recurring event had to do with external factors which neither the organisation nor the broadcasters can probably be held responsible for, as they were beyond their control. As our friend Anthony Granger from Eurovoix reported on 7 December 2015: It has been reported by the press in Tatarstan that all regions of Russia that were due to compete in the 3rd Turkvizyon and 1st Bala Turkvizyon Song Contest have withdrawn from the competition. The withdrawal of Russia’s regions from the contest came after the Ministry of Culture banned Altai Republic, Bashkortostan, Khakassia, Tatarstan, Tuva and the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) from remaining as members of
    2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt, or the December 2016 Istanbul bombings. Either way, this combination of political and military instability in Turkey, the wider region and its diplomatic conflicts with countries or regions of countries which would have sent contestants appears to have been behind Turkvision's eventual demise. The only reason why the 2020 edition appears to have been able to go ahead was because it was held online, like so many events during the early Covid-19 pandemic. All subsequent editions have been cancelled again. If this is true, then maybe it wasn't anything the organisers did wrong, but political and military tensions, conflicts and instability beyond their control. Otherwise this might have developed into a successful recurring contest like Eurovision. In that sense it is perhaps a tragedy that it never became as notable and successful, and we're kind of left to clean up the remains of something which never became quite as notable as it could have been. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 12:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete all. This is not the Eurovision Song Contest, where the per country articles are justified. The show is important enough to carry annual editions. That's already something! In the list above, especially the per country/region AND year articles are way over the top. As for the regular by country or region articles, these summarizing stats will be sufficent. The by country/region list could be extended with zero medals countries. Elsewhere in the Turkvision Song Contest article, the canceled editions can be added to a list, detailing what had been decided by the time of cancellation. Greater point – also for other nominations and editing – is that folks rush to create totally unnecessary SPINOFFs without making sure that all information readers will look for is in the main article. gidonb (talk) 13:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Would you also agree with my point that the Azerbaijan pages are an exception to this rule, and should be kept? Or have I missed something, and should we consider them for nomination as well? Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 14:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All Turkvison by country/region articles deserve to be deleted. gidonb (talk) 04:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree that all Turkvision country/region articles should be deleted. I do not see why
WP:ONESOURCE and should also be considered for deletion. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 14:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete all per nom.  // Timothy :: talk  01:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider possibility of redirecting and whether these articles should ALL be considered for deletion or selectively.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Why? The result is clear. I recycled the one reference at Russia in the Turkvision Song Contest I wanted to recycle, so I've got nothing else to salvage. Poland in the Turkvision Song Contest is the only other article I (or anyone else) specifically suggested would be worth manually merging to anything else, but nobody has mentioned Poland ever again. Piotrus and The person who loves reading suggested Redirect/Merge, but did not specify anything in particular to be merged. With 5 Delete All versus 2 Redirect/Merge, the latter two not specifying what should be "Merged" exactly (after I implicitly asked Piotrus to specify what should be 'very selective[ly]' merged, receiving no response), there's nothing to consider for a selective merger. If you like, we can keep the Poland article for now, but I will nominate it again in my next round where I will also include the Azerbaijan articles (as demanded by everyone whom I asked). Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 05:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. in part due to a deletion rationale that reads more like an opinion that a valid argument for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shoenice

Shoenice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable random youtuber FMSky (talk) 23:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 21:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PRJCT18

PRJCT18 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I

notability threshold. Pichpich (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allison Kugel

Allison Kugel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I became aware of this article from a post that an IP made at BLPN [3] (that they later deleted). This article has a chequered history, having been created by a sockpuppeteer and has seemingly received a lot of promotional editing, which has since been repeatedly cut down. I'm just not seeing any coverage that passes

WP:GNG, including coverage in previous versions of the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Journalism, and United States of America. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure if it's the same person, quite a few mentions of this person that does interviews [4]... For what's in the article, being laid off isn't notable, 9/11 is neither here nor there, employment- and notability-wise. Oaktree b (talk) 01:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think the interviewer is the same person. She seems to be associated with PR.com. I was not able to find any sigcov of her work as an interviewer, but only mentions in passing. The closest I was able to find was this, but this is in the unreliable NYPOST, so therefore is not usable. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete prolific interviewer of celebrities, but I find no independent sources about her. She is listed as an author in tons of minor publications, including at least one, Cannabis Today, for which no articles appear. She has self-published a memoir. Lamona (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the Entrepreneur source in the article appears to be a contributor piece, which per WP:RS/P should be treated as self-published, and I have also not found independent and reliable coverage to support notability. The Amazon listing for the self-published book also does not appear to list substantial, independent, reliable, and secondary coverage in its "Praise for Journaling Fame" section. The best coverage seems to be a 2016 news.com.au interview that also announces the upcoming book, without substantial independent or secondary content. Beccaynr (talk) 01:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on

"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Prince Samolah

Prince Samolah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing

WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 20:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brahim Souleymane

Brahim Souleymane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing

WP:GNG. The most I was able to find was this 2017 piece on his contract renewal with his club. JTtheOG (talk) 20:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

Epeli Saukuru

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ JTtheOG (talk) 16:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Epeli Saukuru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing

WP:GNG. I was able to find this and this, which doesn't seem to be enough. JTtheOG (talk) 20:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Keep - refs added. There are plenty of refs on the Fiji Sun; I've added a few, and its just a matter of picking out the good ones from the usual coverage.--IdiotSavant (talk) 03:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Akuressa Maha Vidyalaya

Akuressa Maha Vidyalaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Schools need to pass

WP:NORG. My searches in English and Sinhala didn't yield anything that was clear significant coverage. The best that I could find was Dinamina (translated) but this isn't enough on its own. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nels Jensen

Nels Jensen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I noticed this due to vandalism but failed to see the notability. After doing a google et. al. I still fail to find any reason for notability or how they could pass

WP:GNG KylieTastic (talk) 18:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: I did a quick Google search and found a bunch of things about other Nels Jensens, and an IMDb page which may have to do with him, but
for many reasons that's not a great source. Besides that I couldn't find anything on this specific Nels Jensen that could be used as a source. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 19:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brooke C. Wells

Brooke C. Wells (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per

WP:USCJN Snickers2686 (talk) 18:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. as additional sources to establish notability have been located and added to the article. Liz Read! Talk! 20:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Islands of Insight

Islands of Insight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. No meaningful content, no notability, fails

WP:TOOSOON. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. The participants here are not altogether clear on their opinions of the articles included in this bundled nomination but I'm interpreting the consensus here as a Keep all. I closed the AFD on Daryush Shokof but you have to be careful if you want to nominate articles for people merely "related" with a person whose article was deleted and evaluate each subject on their own. Liz Read! Talk! 20:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seven Servants

Seven Servants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per my reasons on my deletion nomination of Daryush Shokof as well as my deletion nomination of a film made by him, this person and his films aren't notable. I am also nominating the following related pages because they are non-notable subjects related to Shokof:

Venussian Tabutasco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Narges Rashidi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sonja Kirchberger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
WP:PROD'd) RteeeeKed💬📖 18:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on

"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Ariunbold Batsaikhan

Ariunbold Batsaikhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing

WP:GNG. Also tried using his native name. JTtheOG (talk) 18:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Comment Have found [12], [13], which is little bit, and there are number of sources like this, his name mentioned in match reports. Also is this footballer also a chef? There are a couple of interesting results, not sure how much can contribute to GNG. Remains to be seen. Govvy (talk) 08:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Govvy: Well these two sources are simply passing mentions, and do not contribute significantly to GNG. I did see the Utah-based chef in stories like this and this. While it seems interesting, I doubt it's the same person, and even if it was him, I still think it would not satisfy GNG. However, that is why we're at AfD. Cheers. JTtheOG (talk) 16:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      @JTtheOG That says goalkeeper... Ariunbold Batsaikhan, so it should be him. Ivan Milenin (talk) 13:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      @JTtheOG Comment I think you might be confused with these sources for that matter from the chef and the goalkeeper. That's how it happened. Ivan Milenin (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 16:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Aruba international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 20:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jelano Cruden

Jelano Cruden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to

WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Register

Dead Register (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing anything that allows the band to pass

WP:GNG - RichT|C|E-Mail 17:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on

"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 16:31, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Yamaha TTR225

Yamaha TTR225 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN motorcycle - fails

WP:PRODUCT UtherSRG (talk) 16:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leandros Lillis

Leandros Lillis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A thorough

WP:BEFORE
was carried out in Greek, revealing the following sources:

  • A transfer announcement by Omonia, coverage not going beyond the routine announcement
  • A similar announcement for Ermis Aradippou
  • An article in Sigmalive about him being considered for transfer to Bayern, purely speculative article with no depth
  • A two sentence article in Phileleftheros about him being involved in the national youth team.
  • A further article on his college football performance merely mentions him by name [14]

I also note the link to an interview in the article, which is now sadly dead. I do not think that this would change the outcome of my assessment though.

As such the article fails

WP:SPORTSCRIT due to the lack of significant coverage about the subject. GGT (talk) 14:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lenos Georgiou

Lenos Georgiou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thorough searches in Greek and English have yielded no sources that provide

WP:SPORTCRIT. GGT (talk) 14:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gina Mainwal

Gina Mainwal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN musician - fails

WP:MUSICBIO. UtherSRG (talk) 12:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete, and for me, too, regrettably. Searched using English and German phrases, but between really minor references to her as drummer and director (for music videos, too, e. g. Tacocat), I don't think together it would all pass the threshold. Then again, maybe someone who is more experienced than me would make the call that it does. --Ouro (blah blah) 14:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Musa Muhammed (entrepreneur)

Musa Muhammed (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam sources, we really need to blacklist some of these. 17 year old Nigerian "internet entrepreneur" who is famous enough to be featured in Bangladesh[15] with his company "Sam Marketer", which according to their own website "Sam Marketer provides top-notch digital marketing services, including Wikipedia article creation"[16] where they also claim to have worked for Real Madrid! No evidence of this can be found, of course. Typical use of "articles" in "newspapers" where you just pay to get a profile online, making it look as if you are really successful. Nothing reliable could be found to establish that they have received any independent attention.

Fram (talk) 13:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

I don't this are fake according to interview by Vanguard [17] Their company were new company maybe before he start "Sam Marketer" he have been working for Real Madrid and according to their online presence they have independent sourcessorting/Technology|Technology]], and Nigeria. Sammarkk (talk) 13:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you, Sammarkk, pretend not to be associated with Sam Marketer? Or should I say
Fram (talk) 13:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Am new here so I just choose topic and I see it already deleted page that's I change the name and you can that I have contribute to many articles Sammarkk (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not notable. These paid articles to serve as refs for 'entrepreneurs' are a problem across Nigerian Wikipedia, I've nominated half a dozen of them in the last couple days. Nswix (talk) 14:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and salt. Not notable, largely PROMO and iffy sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or speedy and salt. I agree with Fram, we need to start blacklisting some of these seemingly legit sources that are happy to run any promo story for clicks; otherwise this will sooner or later make a complete mockery of our notability standards. (And I note with some despair that Indian media are now exporting their churnalism services abroad. Oh great.) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Maybe we should have a new CSD criteria for founders, CEOs and entrepreneurs who are in high school or even junior high school. I saw an article about a 13 year old "industrialist" recently. Liz Read! Talk! 21:40, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Should have a CSD for articles made up of nothing but these paid promotional articles. They're easy enough to spot and so many BLPs that get deleted are full of them. Nswix (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep/rewrite There's significant coverage about the article, while the article might not pass
    WP:NPOV and might be non disclosure of payment, this article should be cleaned up and rewrite, it may be move to the draft space, but shouldn't be deleted Lolafam (talk) 11:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete Per nominator. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 22:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep - see Vanguard (Nigeria) and The Guardian (Nigeria). These are major national newspapers in Nigeria. The subject clearly meets the notability requirements. I don't find the content of the newspaper articles very compelling but that's true of 100,000's of Wikipedia articles on North American topics and their North American references. The writing style of the newspaper articles is a bit florid but if you read the Nigerian press, that's typical. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 18:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This is clearly a scam page. An entrepreneur who dropped out of university and started a company which is now doing so well hes had multiple articles published about him, by 17 years old?
    Those publications might not be as trustworthy as you think if they're writing about fluff pieces about teenage 'entrepreneurs'. Nswix (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, there's no shortage in North America of people who're famous for being famous. As I said, I'm personally not very interested in this person; should this person be notable -- I don't think so. I'd delete about 20% of our articles if it were up to me to decide based on what should be notable. But that's not the basis of our notability requirements. Like it or not, this kid's in the national news.
    I go by what is notable and that will be the closing admin's approach, too.
    Those newspapers are the national newspapers I read while in Nigeria. Their tone is distinctly Nigerian.--A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 19:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    These articles are paid for crapvertising, and these newspapers should be blacklisted, as we clearly can´t trust them to post articles based on objective newsworthiness or truthfulness. We shouldn´t tolerate such practices to govern Wikipedia content even if these are the main newspapers of a large country. The claims in the article can not be matched to anything in reality, just like the claims on the company website (Real Madrid???) are completely imaginary. The "article" in the Bengali newspaper just gives more evidence of the intent behind and the reason for these articles, paid for promotion.
    Fram (talk) 21:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Delete based on this comment by User:JoelleJay at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omogboye Saheed Ayodeji. It cites a journalism expert discussing rampant Nigerian journalism corruption. (That said, the Nigerian reporting style during my short time there was florid even when reporting stuff like the weather.) --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 19:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The subject clearly lacks independent coverage in reliable sources. Both the Vanguard and The Guardian sources are promotional pieces meant to give the subject an internet presence.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 02:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support for Deletion: I think, this article is not notable. I do not know if it is right to say this! A person with this name forced me to create this article on Social Media! I declined the offer to make this article because I didn't find it noteworthy! Maybe he paid someone else or he could create this article himself! ≈ Farhan  «Talk» 08:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Fails
    WP:GNG. Maliner (talk) 08:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

D. Wayne Mitchell

D. Wayne Mitchell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:ENT. UtherSRG (talk) 12:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete PROMO for what appears to be a local theater person, nothing of note. Long way from Broadway. Oaktree b (talk) 13:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on

"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Vermont Business Magazine

Vermont Business Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

talk to me! 13:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fatuntele Tunde

Fatuntele Tunde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another "entrepreneur" article whose sources are mostly paid promotional pieces. Does not meet

WP:IS. Nswix (talk) 13:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bobo Ajudua

Bobo Ajudua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another "entrepreneur" article whose sources are mostly paid promotional pieces. Does not meet

WP:IS. Nswix (talk) 12:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

George Omoraro

AfDs for this article:
George Omoraro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another "entrepreneur" article whose sources are mostly paid promotional pieces. Does not meet

WP:IS. Nswix (talk) 12:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey Bone (disambiguation)

Monkey Bone (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unneeded disambiguation page; can be handled just using hatnotes. {{one other topic}} was added 4 months ago, and no entries have been added to the page since – the only thing that seems like a potential new entry would be the literal bone of a monkey, but Monkey doesn't go into the skeletal structures of monkeys, and I don't know where else on Wikipedia that information would be, so there's no article to link to. A previous entry of "a monkey's bone" was refactored into the lede in 2009, before being removed when the {{one other topic}} template was added. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 11:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Though unlike previous poster, I'd leave
Monkey Bone redirecting to the record company, while Monkeybone is the film; hatnotes are already in place at both targets. PamD 07:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. This is a different article that the version that was nominated for deletion so I'm going to weigh the opinions of editors who evaluated the expanded article more heavily and close this discussion as a Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 19:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Pratidin

Bangladesh Pratidin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage

WP:BEFORE M.parvage (talk) 11:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Comment: I considered
    WP:BEFORE
    ; But I encourage contributors to do a search on it before giving an opinion. I also did a source analysis.

Source assessment table: prepared by User:m.parvage
Source
Independent?
 Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward
GNG
?
Source 1 No Own website; see
WP:IIS
 ? No doesn't matter ✘ No
Source 2 No Own website ? No self promotion ✘ No
Source 3 No Not at all Yes No content is just about a refernece ✘ No
Source 4 No promotional content Yes No No significant coverage,
WP:SIGCOV
; Just a PR content 		✘ No
Source 5 No No No not pointing the subject in detail, doesn't satisfy
WP:SIGCOV
 ✘ No
Source 6 No About an employee not the organization ? No ✘ No
Source 7 No No mention ? No No mention ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

M.parvage (talk) 11:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Table above shows that
    WP:GNG has not been met. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 11:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete I agree with the source table, there is nothing showing notability, or even using RS. Oaktree b (talk) 13:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep- The largest circulated newspaper by print sales is the type of article we should have in an encyclopedia. It has been the best-selling newspaper in Bangladesh, a country of over 160 million people, for the last ten years; if that does not suggest notability, then I do not what does. The article is in bad shape, but it can be improved. The Daily Star is a rival publication and the article on Bangladesh Pratidin mentions it is the most circulated newspaper based on the government database while the Daily Star's sister concern, Prothom Alo, comes second; this cannot be considered promotional.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Best selling is not a notable thing.please read
    WP:IIS and see the examples also. Thanks M.parvage (talk) 14:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
See Wikipedia:Notability (periodicals), Bangladesh Pratidin is a newspaper of record in Bangladesh.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to
WP:NPERIODICAL
,
1. The periodical has made significant impact in its field or other area: But it is not.
2. The periodical has received a notable award or honor at a national or international level: but it is not
3. The periodical is or was the proceedings of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association: Unfortunately it is not
4. The periodical has had regular and significant usage as a citation in academic or scholarly works: But it is not
None of it's source represent those. M.parvage (talk) 14:34, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 07:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mitra Rafee

Mitra Rafee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N, the references are not reliable. And some I checked, they actually don't mention her at all. Ladsgroupoverleg 09:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 11:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The references did not mention this actor's name for the award and the references that announced the list of awards are unofficial and non-independent advertising sites. Appears to be written in a PROMO style, not notable anyways please check the references . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.193.77.75 (talk) 14:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. This looks like a promo created by an
    WP:SPA, but I couldn't verify Farsi sources. Suitskvarts (talk) 18:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I'm closing this as Keep because those advocating Keep are talking about sources establishing notability while those arguing for Delete are basically stating that he is too young to deserve an article which is a form of

I don't like it. If I had voted in this discussion instead of closed it, I would have voiced support for a Redirect but as I see it, the consensus today is to Keep this article. Any rename can be discussed on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 07:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Bryce Maximus James

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marked for speedy deletion under category A10 as previous article, simply titled Bryce James is a redirect to his father LeBron James.

If the editor that redirected that article, there is no reason IMHO that is worthy or recreating the article under another name. It is simply a way to get around an edit they don’t like. BostonMensa (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bryce James BostonMensa (talk) 14:39, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it was redirected to LeBron James from 2022 until Today when the redirect was changed. There are people that are very determined. BostonMensa (talk) 14:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He is more notable than other local high school athletes because he's being reported on by multiple reliable sources. Sure, not necessarily because of his accomplishments but
WP:GNG doesn't care about that. ~Kvng (talk) 14:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Seems flimsy argument at best. What I see here is he getting this attention because who is father is and I lost track of how many times people have said notability is not inherited. As far as I am concerned, it is about what he has accomplished, in this case on the basketball court and not the luck of the cosmic drawer on who his father is. I don’t see basketball accomplishments that make him as or more notable than his peers. 23:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC) BostonMensa (talk) 23:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You don't seem to disagree that he's received media attention. Sorry you don't like
WP:INHERIT is about subjects that have not received their own coverage but are associated (e.g. by marriage, birth, etc.) with a notable subject. It certainly does not say that someone associated with a notable subject can't be notable. ~Kvng (talk) 00:36, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The media being interested is meaningless re:being notable. On slow news days or if the News program has 45 seconds to fill, they will cover a double rainbow cross town. Doesn’t mean it is wikiworthy. BostonMensa (talk) 01:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The difference is
WP:SUSTAINED coverage. The double rainbow only gets coverage for a brief period of time. If the same double rainbow persisted for years and got coverage over that period, that would make it notable. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 16:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I was hoping we'd turn up other sources at this point. Still a !delete, with a smaller !vote for ~redirect if it goes that way. Oaktree b (talk) 18:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure why the !vote for redirect is smaller than for delete. There is information about him in the LeBron James article and this is a plausible search term. So even if there is reason not to have a standalone article, I see no reason not to have a redirect. Rlendog (talk) 15:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- He looks good to pass WP:GNG, I found this sources [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26]Epcc12345 (talk) 12:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 08:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, as he has received sustained significant coverage in many outlets. The reason why he's receiving coverage is not relevant to notability. However, I wouldn't object if the content was merged to LeBron James. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources presented by Epcc12345. More than enough to satisfy GNG. I would suggest a move to Bryce James also but this is not the correct venue. Carson Wentz (talk) 01:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Too Soon to establish independent notability. He is 16. He has not done anything notable yet outside of being born to famous people. Trillfendi (talk) 03:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Gwalior gharana. Viable ATD in lieu of sufficient sourcing. Star Mississippi 14:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Izat Fateh Ali Khan

Izat Fateh Ali Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails MUSICBIO and BLP. No in-depth coverage, multiple sources failed verification. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete Coverage from the Daily Times is in-depth but that’s about it; the other sources are lacking. 116.92.232.6 (talk) 02:52, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No one has discussed the failed verification part of the nomination
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The first source [27] does not contain information about Izat Ali Fateh Khan’s place and date of birth. The third source [28] does not verify that Izat Fateh Ali Khan is the son of Ustad Fateh Ali Khan. The subject is not mentioned in the fourth [29], fifth [30], and eleventh [31] sources. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 01:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If some cited sources fail to verify any stated fact in the article or do not mention the subject, we simply remove the sources. This is no reason to delete the whole article. Insight 3 (talk) 07:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
With all these badrefs, the article is left with few reliable sources (the Dawn articles being mostly trivial and the two nearly-identical Daily Times articles) with no other significant coverage. The article claims that Izat Ali Fateh Khan has performed on television, radio, and “has appeared in several programs numerous times”, which is not supported by the source listed. Claims of notability (particularly the claim that the subject has been featured on television, presumably national television) lack verifiability, hence failing notability guidelines. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 09:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Gwalior gharana where mentioned. The subject is clearly part of a dynastic musical tradition that collectively receives significant coverage, but the available sources provide little to no significant coverage of young Izat. signed, Rosguill talk 01:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 08:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No Award, not any notable contribution, can't satisfy
    WP:GNG, Fast deletion recommended.PARVAGE talk! 05:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 07:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CDA Public School and College

CDA Public School and College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG. All sources seem to be either too short, passing mentions or related to the subject. I couldn't find any suitable sources for the article. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on

"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 07:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Andrew Mesourouni

Andrew Mesourouni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find

WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 07:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jacky Ruben

Jacky Ruben (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Tiny bit of coverage here [32], that's about all I can find. For lack of sources. Oaktree b (talk) 13:34, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Hockey Victoria. Liz Read! Talk! 07:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Melton Hockey Club

Melton Hockey Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the coverage I could find is local and thus does not meet

WP:ORG. The club does not play in the top tier competition in Australia which is Hockey One. LibStar (talk) 06:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎.

talk) 11:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

List of chairmen of the State Council of the Republic of Adygea

List of chairmen of the State Council of the Republic of Adygea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list containing zero extant Wikipedia pages meets

talk) 05:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Amazing Facts. Liz Read! Talk! 05:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Granite Bay Hilltop Seventh-day Adventist Church

Granite Bay Hilltop Seventh-day Adventist Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Granite Bay Hilltop Seventh-day Adventist Church does not satisfy the requirements of

WP:LOCAL. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

--A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 20:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per

WP:BLUDGEON‎. SouthernNights (talk) 11:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Allan R. Bomhard

AfDs for this article:
Allan R. Bomhard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page has been nominated twice before for

WP:FRINGEBLP considering he is mainly self-publishing to an already bought in audience. Warrenmck (talk) 00:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Weak keep -- I've seen an article by him in what appeared to be a reputable scholarly journal (published before the rise of the Internet). Benjamin Whorf was basically an independent scholar without much in the way of formal academic credentials. Also, I don't see why believing in Nostratic means that your article should be deleted -- the article of Aharon Dolgopolsky, a rather widely-known scholar, should certainly not be deleted. AnonMoos (talk) 19:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Worf was publishing in an era where linguistics was much more defined by informal research, and pointedly he didn't spend decades publishing theories that ran counter to the academic consensus in the lack of evidence (indeed, his theories were influential in part because of the testability of his hypotheses). Keep in mind that there are plenty of high-quality articles about Nostraticists on Wikipedia (see: Sergei Starostin), they're just predominantly academics who continued working on the idea rather than people who were branching off saying all the other Nostratcisists were wrong and putting forward their own alternative to zero fanfare decades after scholarly consensus had moved on. I think this is more akin to someone continuing to work on homeopathy post the water memory paper being discredited. A fair and proper treatment of the Bomhard article would result in it being an orphaned stub, which it's increasingly converging on in the time since this AfD was posted as others work on cleaning the article. Warrenmck (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to

(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:32, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Kendriya Vidyalaya, Mati

AfDs for this article:
Kendriya Vidyalaya, Mati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since the last AfD we're now a lot stricter on schools with no inherent notability. Only primary sources provided and this one fails

WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 02:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to WFFT-TV. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy's Place

Happy's Place (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable only on local level. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indiana. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to or merge into parent station, WFFT-TV. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 02:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I actually am slightly less gung-ho on a merge than on most articles of this kind because I've found some surprising SIGCOV in the Fort Wayne media, including after the show's run ended around 1998. The papers are in NewsBank, but several long articles were written on Happy's Place. There is also some SIGCOV on the first host, Mike L. Fry, mostly because his business career selling cookies led to a fair number of features. There are three long articles with significant info on the show and there is also a specific mention in Broadcasting & Cable magazine in 1998; the article notes that the format inspired a show on WAMI-TV in Miami! Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • "HAPPYness \ - Happy the Hobo's the name. Nothing else - simply Happy, OK? That's how the grease-whiskered clown wants it. He know his "Place."", The News-Sentinel July 30, 1987
    • "CLOWN ABOUT TOWN HAPPY THE HOBO MAY NOT BE A BOZO, BUT THE HOST OF WFFT 'S `HAPPY'S PLACE' HAS NO PROBLEM MAKING CHILDREN LAUGH", The Journal Gazette January 23, 1997 p. 10D
    • "No clowning around - 'Happy's Place,' a children's show that aired on WFFT, really was a happy place", The News-Sentinel October 23, 2002 p. 1F
      • For 15 years Happy's Place was an after-school standard in Fort Wayne and the surrounding areas. The locally produced children's show, which aired weekdays on WFFT, Channel 55, boasted an audience of thousands, a two-year wait for tickets and a host - Happy the Hobo - who gave a generation of kids its first glimpse at bulging biceps. But after nearly two decades on the air, Happy the Hobo and his sidekick Froggy... disappeared.
    • "All local, most of the time", Broadcasting & Cable January 19, 1998
      • It's not a new idea, [Adam] Ware acknowledges, but one that must be tailored to appeal to local viewers. He cites the example of a kids block created by WFFT-TV Fort Wayne, Ind., several years ago. Called Happy's Place, it combined Disney Afternoon cartoons with local segments hosted by a local Bozo-type character. "But in the Nielsen book it was Happy's Place. You never saw Duck Tales, and it was gigantic. They owned kids" and the transition show that followed.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Seems to have some coverage as above, a selective merge with a paragraph in the article for the station should suffice. Oaktree b (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 01:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Ingvaldson

Christopher Ingvaldson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ten year test for enduring significance, or the standards at PERP for when an article about a criminal is actually warranted.
Instead, the article started out as a poorly sourced sports BLP on the basis of his previously having played field hockey at a level that might possibly have passed the sports notability standards of 2006 but certainly doesn't pass the sports notability standards of 2023, and then by 2009 it featured such sparkling prose as "Ingvaldson is also locally known as the only teacher at St.Georges who can rip a phonebook in half(if he was spazzing) and survive an argument with Mr.Jamieson" (unsourced, natch) — the crime issue came along only in 2010, four years after the article was created, and the article most likely would never have even existed at all (or would have been shitcanned by AFD if it had been newly created) on the basis of the crime alone. There's an additional BLP sensitivity here, because he once tangentially happened to briefly share the same employer as a prominent Canadian politician a full decade before the crime, and IP editors have attempted to inflate that minor fact into the explosive implication that the politician shares direct personal culpability in the subject's crime.
This person simply is not significant enough to warrant the amount of monitoring this requires. Bearcat (talk) 01:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Horrible crime, but simply a routine crime of this type with no long-term legal effects or changing of anything really. Found guilty, did his time. Almost a revenge page at this point. Oaktree b (talk) 13:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not notable for either the crime or their hockey career. Being a room mate and friend of Trudeau isn't useful either as notability is not inherited. Canterbury Tail talk 18:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This almost appears to be some attempt to smear Justin Trudeau, as it really has no importance in relation to the person; pure conjecture, but there are a certain set of individuals on social medial that think Trudeau is some sort of WW2-era German person. Which I can't type because of the firewall at work... "I lived with a guy once, and he's famous now but wasn't then" doesn't really add to notability, maybe an interesting tidbit. Oaktree b (talk) 19:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree it’s delete for all the reasons stated above. This looks like a very easy call. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Obviously, it's all out of proportion. And the attachment to Trudeau certainly raises a lot of questions. Suitskvarts (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Although there is disagreement on the value of recently found sources, I see a consensus to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 04:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

James Koehnline

James Koehnline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are not many reliable sources that discuss James Koehnline in detail. Even the cited sources barely discuss him at all. I found some passing references and citations to his work, but that is not enough to write a full article on the man. Furthermore, quite a bit of the found content was published by obscure publishers or was self-published. Since Koehnline is still alive, we have to be particularly careful about this type of thing. ―Susmuffin Talk 14:33, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Considering the page and updates here in AfD, his work is definitely notable, though the article leaves a lot to be desired in its current revision. Suitskvarts (talk) 18:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Accessing all three sources aforementioned, I do not see how they meet the
    significant coverage
    criterion nevertheless constitute enough material to write a biography worthy of the subject.
    1. Legend-Tripping Online is a three-sentence mention that does not say more than that he was a collage artist who illustrated for Hakim Bey.
    2. Semiotexte is previously discussed above as being a standard artist bio, potentially self-authored, shown alongside his work in the journal. (Mind, too, that he is part of the Autonomedia collective that publishes Semiotexte.)
    3. The IEEE article is the only article that approaches Koehnline's work in any depth but sparsely and with little biographical detail.
Altogether it would seem impossible to write a detailed article based on this material, especially if these are the best sources available. A redirect to other articles, e.g., to cover as a sentence in Bey's or Autonomedia's articles, also seems untenable as
undue weight. czar 02:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tobi Mohammed

Tobi Mohammed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NBIO or WP:GNG Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 13:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This one isn’t even a “philanthropist” as well as having a job. Mccapra (talk) 04:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Per nominator. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 22:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vehicle registration plates of the United States for 2022

Vehicle registration plates of the United States for 2022 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vehicle registration plates of the United States for 2021, same reasoning.

Also nominated:

I've not included the even older ones to keep this somewhat manageable. But further such lists exist for every year from 1901 to 1999 as well...

Fram (talk) 10:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per WIA Dronebogus (talk) 17:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (albeit with some regret). The United States doesn't issue license plates (save for its own vehicles and foreign diplomats) so I don't see the value to Wikipedia of cataloging each year of the various state and territory plates which may or may not have changed from the previous year. Minnesota's plates, for example, have changed only slightly since the late 1970s. While I can see how the information is interesting, I don't see how it's encylopedic for Wikipedia. --Sable232 (talk) 01:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to
    Vehicle registration plates of the United States. The person who loves reading (talk) 17:35, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Redirect (all the articles back to 1901) as per above.  Mr.choppers | ✎  13:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 07:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arto Nyberg

Arto Nyberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I doubt the notability of the subject and through

WP:BEFORE didn't find good RS to establish it. The main concern here is that this BLP is completely unreferenced, and the Finnish version of the page doesn't contribute much, too. However, I may miss something. MartinPict (talk) 14:32, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Comment - It's also a bit difficult to separate him from his TV show, which also frustrates searching as there's a lot of false positives along the lines of "So-and-so said something to Arty Nyberg" in Finnish. But still, there's plenty of coverage about him in all kinds of Finnish papers, even if a lot of it is interviews or profiles you'd expect about a "generic famous person". I'll look for more when I have the time from other stuff, but here's something to start with:
  • Large profile in Anna (subscription required; only shows a snippet by default): [33]
  • Profile/interview in Seiska: [34]
  • Profile/interview in ET: [35]
  • A thing in Seura: [36]
  • Profiles/interviews in the [Iltalehti]] tabloid: [37], [38], [39]
  • Some more in the Ilta-Sanomat tabloid: [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48] (there's more, but that's a representative sample)
Pretty much none of these are great in isolation, but the pure mass and sustained length of coverage gives me pause and I think I'm leaning towards a weak keep at the moment. -Ljleppan (talk) 07:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Yleradio, I think is the best option. Oaktree b (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 20:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nayef Al-Rodhan

Nayef Al-Rodhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no substantive RS coverage of the subject. The subject does not appear to meet the criteria for

WP:REFSPAMming to promote the subject across Wikipedia. Thenightaway (talk) 23:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Did you check Scholar before nominating? he's well cited in both philosophy and neuroscience so he meets
WP:NAUTHOR for his book "Meta-Geopolitics of Outer Space" which appears to have several reviews. - car chasm (talk) 15:41, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
These are not significant citation counts given that Al-Rodhan has spammed his publications into the lead of a vast number of Wikipedia articles where they remained for more than a decade. For example, his most-cited work, "Definitions of globalization: A comprehensive overview and a proposed definition" is a self-published manuscript that he
WP:CITOGENESIS where the academic places his non-notable research prominently into Wikipedia articles, academics find it on Wikipedia and lazily cite it for basic terms, and the citations themselves become an indication that the subject is actually notable. As for the reviews of his book, I could only find one in Space Policy, which says "this is a somewhat curious book: it claims to look at space power in a new way, but doesn't clearly produce any new insights".[50] Thenightaway (talk) 16:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Kırklareli. Viable AtD when no sourcing has been found Star Mississippi 20:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kırklareli Jewish quarter

Kırklareli Jewish quarter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source is a forum. According to the tag, inadequate referencing has been a problem for almost 9 years. I wouldn't also have a separate article for a quarter of a small town, unless it had a significant amount of content and coverage. Aintabli (talk) 21:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article links to a book about the community. There's an article that includes recent coverage here[51], there will be other historical articles. There's historical population numbers in the 2008 Encyclopaedia Judaica[52]. Jahaza (talk) 23:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's an academic book chapter in Turkish[53]. Jahaza (talk) 23:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@
WP:NPLACE, which leaves the notability of unrecognized neighborhoods open for discussion. Aintabli (talk) 21:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
That's just a question of changing the name of the article, which is clearly about the Jewish community in the city. Jahaza (talk) 11:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A move would definitely be appropriate if this article is not deleted. Though, problems remain as the article largely went unnoticed for 14 years. It also doesn't appear to be the convention to have separate articles for non-distinct communities within a small settlement. Instead, expanding on the Jewish population on Kırklareli, a more-visible article, could be more beneficial until we reach the point a separate entry would allow for more expansion. Aintabli (talk) 21:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless more reliable sources are added, cannot find anything that proves
WP:GNG Karnataka (talk) 19:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Consensus is problems can be solved by editing Star Mississippi 20:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Globalization in India

Globalization in India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is just one large

WP:SYNTH essay. The content in this essay might be belong in various forms on articles such as History of India, Economic history of India, or Economy of India, but has no encyclopedic value as a standalone article. Thenightaway (talk) 23:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Politics, Economics, and India. Skynxnex (talk) 02:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Trim I agree that the article reads as an essay, with analysis rather than just reporting. For example One event that helped India immensely was when Netscape went public on 9 August 1995. And There is a food security crisis in India because a significant portion of the land has been designated to grow crops for biofuel. Crops like rice and wheat are often harvested in large quantities. However, the amount of crops that are used for biofuel is largely unregulated, with an inadequate amount going to the poor and needy. However, there is also much useful and interesting referenced material. I recommend that, if the article is kept, it be brutally edited to remove every paragraph or sentence that does not have an adequate citation (noting that sometimes the citation for a sentence comes with the sentence before, and that sometimes the justifying citation is to another Wikipedia page, of course.) This will give a much smaller and focussed article. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The topic is notable but the content is a mess. Could be a
    WP:TNT job? Aszx5000 (talk) 23:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 01:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Omogboye Saheed Ayodeji

Omogboye Saheed Ayodeji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another "entrepreneur" article whose sources are mostly paid promotional pieces. Does not meet

WP:IS. Nswix (talk) 00:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. Nswix (talk) 00:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete Beyond sharing advice on how to succeed [54], it's all promotional fluff. Oaktree b (talk) 01:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete being a guy with a job doesn’t make you notable. Mccapra (talk) 04:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nominator. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 23:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. No evidence articles are paid promotional pieces as asserted by nominator. The florid tone is typical Nigerian journalism style. These are national Nigerian newspapers cited The Guardian (Nigeria), Vanguard (Nigeria), The Sun (Nigeria), This Day, The Nation (Nigeria). --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 02:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No one's arguing that it's not Nigerian. Just that large newspapers in Nigeria have begun selling fluff pieces.
    Nswix (talk) 02:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    What evidence do you have that these articles are paid journalism? Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 05:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    With their promotional tone and lack of substance, I just dont buy that it can't be promotional, simply because it's widely-published. There of tons of larger publications that are blacklisted. Nswix (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Current refs are non-independent (interviews and other reports of what he said, versus coverage of him), cover Ayhomes, or are all of the above and PROMO. Nigerian newspapers in particular are well known to flout broadcasting rules on paid advertising. Professor Omenugha describes a similar trend in the print media: “In the newspapers, the so called specialised pages of the property, IT and computer businesses and finance pages are prime examples of commercialised spaces. The point is that no attempt is made to let the audience or readers know that these spaces are paid for and they end up holding them as sacred as they would news”. Some journalists also work as paid consultants to politicians and businesses thus threatening professionalism. AIT’s Amarere says it is demeaning to journalism as “some of the concerned journalists now work for companies through which they obtain jobs. They cover their track by saying they are staff of this or that company and run offices outside the newsroom. In this situation it is difficult to balance profession with commercial interest”. "Awards" issued by media are also considered corrupt. “The awards are not free, they are for money and anything that comes with a prize has implications”, says Olumide Adeyinka-Fusika, a lawyer. “If a newspaper names a bank as the best bank of the year and the bank is later indicted for corruption, that newspaper will not be willing to publish the story because that will be like passing a vote of no confidence on their own judgement”. JoelleJay (talk) 17:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    JoelleJay thanks for this! I'm disappointed to say the least since I have cited these newspapers in other AfDs. It remains true that the Nigerian newspaper style tends to the colorful and florid even when reporting the weather. Nevertheless, I think you are probably right about this article and some others now being discussed for deletion: Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Nigeria. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 18:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I think it's probably worth someone starting an RfC somewhere regarding reliable and non-reliable Nigerian news sources. This comes up in multiple AfDs and it would save everybody time to know what's what. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 18:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 01:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Folasade Omotoyinbo

Folasade Omotoyinbo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A "social media entrepreneur" article whose sources are mostly paid. The sources about the subject are promotional pieces. Does not meet

WP:IS. Nswix (talk) 00:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Neutral leaning to delete based on this comment by User:JoelleJay at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omogboye Saheed Ayodeji. It cites a journalism expert discussing rampant Nigerian journalism corruption. (That said, the Nigerian reporting style during my brief time there was florid even when reporting stuff like the weather.) --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 18:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I sampled 10 of the sources and all of them were non-independent Q&A interviews, non-independent coverage of announcements from her ("Omotoyinbo said...", "according to Omotoyinbo", etc.), clearly promotional non-independent pieces (especially from orgs she is affiliated with, like City People), or NCORP-failing coverage of her business. Does not meet GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Nigerian papers use a different writing style to the Western style you are probably familiar with. The tone may seem promotional, but it would be way more blatant if it actually was. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 05:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, note that several participants were actively canvassed to this and similar deletion discussions. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 05:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see what that has to do with me? I wasn't canvassed. JoelleJay (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Regardless of the reasons for a promotional style, the current refs still lack independent SIGCOV of her as they are almost all just repeating things she said. JoelleJay (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I got canvassed to some Nigerian politicians page, and didnt vote, cause I dont know enough about politics. Nswix (talk) 19:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Withdrawn by nominator.

(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Straight A's

Straight A's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 00:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Weak keep I think it just barely makes it to notability. Oaktree b (talk) 13:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep You have also this and this for example. The film was internationally distributed (with 2 different titles in Brazilian and European Portuguese, fwiw). Production has attracted some attention; notable cast and director.— MY, OH, MY!  (mushy yank) — 15:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Meets our notability guideline. Lightburst (talk) 22:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I speedy withdraw per consensus. The Film Creator (talk) 02:57, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2023_June_15&oldid=1162583109"