Acidophiles in acid mine drainage
The outflow of acidic liquids and other pollutants from mines is often
Such microorganisms are responsible for the phenomenon of acid mine drainage (AMD) and thus are important both economically and from a conservation perspective.[8] Control of these acidophiles and their harnessing for industrial biotechnology shows their effect need not be entirely negative.[1]
The use of acidophilic organisms in mining is a new technique for extracting trace metals through bioleaching, and offers solutions for acid mine drainage in mining spoils.
Introduction
Upon exposure to
Acid mine drainage may occur in the mine itself, the spoil heap (particularly
- + + ⇌ + +
Bacterial influences on acid mine drainage
The oxidation of metal sulfide (by oxygen) is slow without colonization by acidophiles, particularly
- Fe2+ + 1/4O2 + H+ → Fe3+ + 1/2H2O
Under the above acidic conditions, ferric iron (Fe3+) is a more potent oxidant than oxygen, resulting in faster pyrite oxidation rates.
A.ferrooxidans is a
The process proceeds through A.ferrooxidans exhibiting a quorum level for the trigger of acid mine drainage (AMD). At first colonisation of metal sulfides there is no AMD, and as the bacteria grow into microcolonies, AMD remains absent, then at a certain colony size, the population begins to produce a measurable change in water chemistry, and AMD escalates.[13] This means pH is not a clear measure of a mine's liability to AMD; culturing A.ferrooxidans (or others) gives a definite indication of a future AMD issue.[13]
Other bacteria also implicated in AMD include
Archaean acidophiles
Though
It is possible that the family Ferroplasmaceae may in fact be more important in AMD than the current paradigm, Acidithiobacillaceae.[14] From a practical viewpoint this changes little, as despite the myriad physiological differences between archaea and bacteria, treatments would remain the same; if pH is kept high, and water and oxygen are prohibited from the pyrite, the reaction will be negligible.[7]
The isolation from
Interactions in the mine community
Tentatively, there may be examples of syntrophy between acidophilic species, and even cross-domain cooperation between archaea and bacteria. One mutualistic example is the rotation of iron between species; ferrous-oxidising chemolithotrophs use iron as an
Another more
The community possesses diversity beyond the bacteria and archaea however; the approximately constant pH present during acid mine drainage make for a reasonably stable environment, with a community that spans a number of
Physiology and biochemistry
Acidophiles display a great range of adaptations to not just tolerating, but thriving in an extreme pH environment (the definition of an acidophile being an organism that has a pH optimum below pH 3). Principal in these is the necessity of maintaining a large pH gradient, to ensure a circumneutral cytoplasm (normally, however not in Picrophilus species). The archaeans have already been discussed above, and further information on their and bacterial adaptations are in basic form in the Figure. To elaborate upon the figure, the bacteria also use membrane proton blocking to maintain a high cytoplasmic pH, which is a passive system as even non-respiring A.ferrooxidans exhibit it.[2] Acidophiles are also able to extrude protons against the pH gradient with unique transport proteins, a process more difficult for moderate- and hyper-thermophiles; a higher temperature causes cell membranes to become more permeable to protons, necessarily leading to increased H+ influx, in the absence of other membrane alterations.[20]
Proton motive force
To grow at low pH, acidophiles must maintain a pH gradient of several pH units across the cellular membrane.
Expelling H+ containing vesicles
Alternatively bacteria can use H+ containing vesicles to avoid cytoplasmic acidity (see Figure), but most require that any H+ taken in must be extruded after use in the electron transport chain (ETC).[1] On the subject of the ETC, an adaptation to living in the mine environment is in the use of different ETC
Genomic adaptations
Genomic adaptations are also present, but not without complications in organisms like Thermoplasmatales archaea, which is both
Improved repair
Acidophiles also benefit from improved DNA and protein repair systems such as chaperones involved in protein refolding.[1] The P.torridus genome just mentioned contains a large numbers of genes concerned with repair proteins.
Biotechnology applications
As supplies of some metals dwindle, other methods of extraction are being explored, including the use of acidophiles, in a process known as bioleaching. Though slower than conventional methods, the microorganisms (which can also include fungi) enable the exploitation of extremely low grade ores with minimum expense.[24] Projects include nickel extraction with A.ferrooxidans and Aspergillus sp. fungi[24] and sulfur removal from coal with Acidithiobacillus sp..[25] The extraction can occur at the mine site, from waste water streams (or the main watercourse if the contamination has reached that far), in bioreactors, or at a power station (for instance to remove sulfur from coal before combustion to avoid sulfuric acid rain).
Future of the technique
AMD continues to be important in the
In 2007, the UK government endorsed a return to coal as an energy source
The fast and efficient protein and DNA repair systems show promise for human medical uses, particularly with regard to cancer and ageing. However further research is required to determine whether these systems really are qualitatively different, and how that can be applied from microorganisms to humans.
As discussed above, acidophiles can have the option to use electron acceptors other than oxygen. Johnson (1998)[8] points out that facultative anaerobism of acidophiles, previously dismissed, could have major implications for AMD control. Further research is needed to determine how far current methods to block oxygen will working, in light of the fact that the reaction may be able to continue anaerobically.
See also
- Microbial metabolism
- Extremophiles
- Acid mine drainage
References
- ^ PMID 17331729.
- ^ PMID 7372573.
- S2CID 11241922.
- S2CID 85892765.
- S2CID 23327298.
- PMID 16957253.
- ^ S2CID 59465457.
- ^ S2CID 86091190.
- ^ Mills, Chris. "The Role of Microorganisms in Acid Mine Drainage". TechnoMine. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
- JSTOR 2402377.
- .
- PMID 10758854.
- ^ S2CID 129323041.
- ^ PMID 16104851.
- PMID 10843038.
- PMID 10966867.
- S2CID 23846350.
- PMID 8522509.
- S2CID 42049238.
- ^ .
- PMID 33725781.
- .
- PMID 15184674.
- ^ .
- S2CID 95926939.
- ^ Environment Agency, 2002, in Pearce, N.J.G., Hartley, S., Perkins, W.T., Dinelli, E., Edyvean, R.G.J., Priestman, G., Bachmann, R. & Sandlands, L. (2007) Dealginated seaweed for the bioremediation of mine waters in mid-wales: Results of field trials from the "BIOMAN" EU life environment project. IMWA Symposium 2007: Water in Mining Environments, Cagliari, Italy, 27-31 May.
- S2CID 3609487.
- ^ Department of Trade and Industry (2007) Meeting the Energy Challenge: a white paper on energy. pp.111-112. Accessed 27/02/08 Archived March 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine