Bacterial vaginosis

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Bacterial vaginosis
Other namesAnaerobic vaginositis, non-specific vaginitis, vaginal bacteriosis, Gardnerella vaginitis
Diagnostic methodTesting the vaginal discharge[6]
Differential diagnosisVaginal yeast infection, infection with Trichomonas[7]
PreventionProbiotics[6]
MedicationClindamycin or metronidazole[6]
Frequency~ 5% to 70% of women[8]

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is an

early delivery among pregnant women.[3][11]

BV is caused by an imbalance of the naturally occurring bacteria in the vagina.

gonorrhoea and chlamydia, sexual partners are not treated.[13] Diagnosis is suspected based on the symptoms, and may be verified by testing the vaginal discharge and finding a higher than normal vaginal pH, and large numbers of bacteria.[6] BV is often confused with a vaginal yeast infection or infection with Trichomonas.[7]

Usually treatment is with an antibiotic, such as clindamycin or metronidazole.[6] These medications may also be used in the second or third trimesters of pregnancy.[6] However, the condition often recurs following treatment.[6] Probiotics may help prevent re-occurrence.[6] It is unclear if the use of probiotics or antibiotics affects pregnancy outcomes.[6][14]

BV is the most common vaginal infection in women of reproductive age.

ethnic groups within a country.[8] While BV-like symptoms have been described for much of recorded history, the first clearly documented case occurred in 1894.[1]

Signs and symptoms

Although about 50% of women with BV are asymptomatic,[16] common symptoms include increased vaginal discharge that usually smells like fish. The discharge is often white or gray in color. There may be burning with urination. Occasionally, there may be no symptoms.[2]

The discharge coats the walls of the vagina, and is usually without significant irritation, pain, or

itching can sometimes occur. By contrast, the normal vaginal discharge will vary in consistency and amount throughout the menstrual cycle and is at its clearest at ovulation—about two weeks before the period starts. Some practitioners claim that BV can be asymptomatic in almost half of affected women,[17] though others argue that this is often a misdiagnosis.[18]

Complications

Although previously considered a mere nuisance infection, untreated bacterial vaginosis may cause increased susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, and

It has been shown that HIV-infected women with bacterial vaginosis (BV) are more likely to transmit HIV to their sexual partners than those without BV.[10] There is evidence of an association between BV and increased rates of sexually transmitted infections such as HIV/AIDS.

human papillomavirus (HPV).[19][21]

In addition, bacterial vaginosis as either

Pregnant women with BV have a higher risk of
in vitro fertilization have a lower implantation rate and higher rates of early pregnancy loss.[19][21]

Causes

Healthy vaginal microbiota consists of species that neither cause symptoms or infections, nor negatively affect pregnancy. It is dominated mainly by Lactobacillus species.

lactobacilli. While the infection involves a number of bacteria, it is believed that most infections start with Gardnerella vaginalis creating a biofilm, which allows other opportunistic bacteria, such as Prevotella and Bacteroides, to thrive.[26][9][27]

One of the main risks for developing BV is

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and various medical authorities, for this and other reasons.[28]

BV is a risk factor for pelvic inflammatory disease, HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), endometriosis, and reproductive and obstetric disorders or negative outcomes. Although BV can be associated with sexual activity, there is no clear evidence of sexual transmission.[26][29][30] It is possible for sexually inactive persons to develop bacterial vaginosis.[29][9]

Also, subclinical iron deficiency may correlate with bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy.[31] A longitudinal study published in February 2006, in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, showed a link between psychosocial stress and bacterial vaginosis persisted even when other risk factors were taken into account.[32] Exposure to the spermicide nonoxynol-9 does not affect the risk of developing bacterial vaginosis.[33]

Diagnosis

Phase contrast microscopy of clue cells in a vaginal swab
clue cells
Gram stain of cells from the vagina (the same magnification) with normal bacterial flora (top) and the bacteria that cause vaginosis (bottom).

To make a diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, a swab from inside the vagina should be obtained. These swabs can be tested for:

Differential diagnosis for bacterial vaginosis includes the following:[35]

The Center for Disease Control (CDC) defines STIs as "a variety of clinical syndromes and infections caused by pathogens that can be acquired and transmitted through sexual activity."[37] But the CDC does not specifically identify BV as sexually transmitted infection.[13]

Amsel criteria

In clinical practice BV can be diagnosed using the Amsel criteria:[38]

  1. Thin, white, yellow, homogeneous discharge
  2. Clue cells on microscopy
  3. pH of vaginal fluid >4.5
  4. Release of a fishy odor on adding alkali—10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution.

At least three of the four criteria should be present for a confirmed diagnosis.[39] A modification of the Amsel criteria accepts the presence of two instead of three factors and is considered equally diagnostic.[40]

Gram stain

An alternative is to use a Gram-stained vaginal smear, with the Hay/Ison[41] criteria or the Nugent[24] criteria. The Hay/Ison criteria are defined as follows:[39]

  • Grade 1 (Normal): Lactobacillus morphotypes predominate.
  • Grade 2 (Intermediate): Some lactobacilli present, but Gardnerella or Mobiluncus morphotypes also present.
  • Grade 3 (Bacterial Vaginosis): Predominantly Gardnerella and/or Mobiluncus morphotypes. Few or absent lactobacilli. (Hay et al., 1994)

Gardnerella vaginalis is the main culprit in BV. Gardnerella vaginalis is a short, Gram-variable rod (coccobacillus). Hence, the presence of clue cells and gram variable coccobacilli are indicative or diagnostic of bacterial vaginosis.[42]

Nugent score

The Nugent score is now rarely used by physicians due to the time it takes to read the slides and requires the use of a trained microscopist.[4] A score of 0–10 is generated from combining three other scores. The scores are as follows:[24]

  • 0–3 is considered negative for BV
  • 4–6 is considered intermediate
  • 7+ is considered indicative of BV.

At least 10–20 high power (1000× oil immersion) fields are counted and an average determined.[43]

Lactobacillus morphotypes – average per high powered (1000× oil immersion) field. View multiple fields.

Gardnerella / Bacteroides morphotypes – average per high powered (1000× oil immersion) field. View multiple fields.

Curved Gram variable rods – average per high powered (1000× oil immersion) field. View multiple fields (note that this factor is less important – scores of only 0–2 are possible)

  • Score 0 for >30
  • Score 1 for 15–30
  • Score 2 for 14
  • Score 3 for <1 (this is an average, so results can be >0, yet <1)
  • Score 4 for 0
  • Score 0 for 0
  • Score 1 for <1 (this is an average, so results can be >0, yet <1)
  • Score 2 for 1–4
  • Score 3 for 5–30
  • Score 4 for >30

DNA hybridization testing with Affirm VPIII was compared to the Gram stain using the Nugent criteria.[44] The Affirm VPIII test may be used for the rapid diagnosis of BV in symptomatic women but uses expensive proprietary equipment to read results, and does not detect other pathogens that cause BV, including Prevotella spp, Bacteroides spp, and Mobiluncus spp.[45] The cervicovaginal microbiome measured using 16S rRNA sequencing has the capacity to increase throughput of the Nugent Score and has demonstrate to be directly comparable to clinical Nugent Score measurement.[46]

Screening

Screening during pregnancy is not recommended in the United States as of 2020 because " the US Preventive Services Task Force concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for bacterial vaginosis in pregnant persons at increased risk for preterm delivery".[47]

Prevention

Some steps suggested to lower the risk include: not

douching, avoiding sex, or limiting the number of sex partners.[48]

One review concluded that probiotics may help prevent re-occurrence.[6] Another review found that, while there is tentative evidence, it is not strong enough to recommend their use for this purpose.[49]

Early evidence suggested that antibiotic treatment of male partners could re-establish the normal microbiota of the male urogenital tract and prevent the recurrence of infection.[19] However, a 2016 Cochrane review found high-quality evidence that treating the sexual partners of women with bacterial vaginosis had no effect on symptoms, clinical outcomes, or recurrence in the affected women. It also found that such treatment may lead treated sexual partners to report increased adverse events.[19]

Treatment

Antibiotics

Treatment is typically with the antibiotics metronidazole or clindamycin.[50] They can be either given by mouth or applied inside the vagina with similar efficacy.[16][50] About 10% to 15% of people, however, do not improve with the first course of antibiotics and recurrence rates of up to 80% have been documented.[21] Recurrence rates are increased with sexual activity with the same pre-/posttreatment partner and inconsistent condom use although estrogen-containing contraceptives decrease recurrence.[51] When clindamycin is given to pregnant women symptomatic with BV before 22 weeks of gestation the risk of pre-term birth before 37 weeks of gestation is lower.[52]

Other antibiotics that may work include

lincosamides, nitroimidazoles, and penicillins.[19]

Bacterial vaginosis is not considered a sexually transmitted infection, and treatment of a male sexual partner of a woman with bacterial vaginosis is not recommended.[53][54]

Probiotics

A 2009 Cochrane review found tentative but insufficient evidence for probiotics as a treatment for BV.

in the vagina.[57] Intravaginal administration is preferred to taking them by mouth.[57] Prolonged repetitive courses of treatment appear to be more promising than short courses.[57]

The lack of effectiveness of commercially available Lactobacillus probiotics may be because most do not actually contain vaginal lactobacilli strains.

live biopharmaceutical medication containing the vaginally important Lactobacillus crispatus which is under development for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis and recurrent urinary tract infections.[58][59][60] It has shown initial effectiveness in considerably reducing recurrence of bacterial vaginosis following antibiotic treatment.[58][60] LACTIN-V is not yet Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved or commercially available.[60][59]

Antiseptics

Topical

immunocompetent people without histories of upper genital tract infections).[61] One study found that vaginal irrigations with hydrogen peroxide (3%) resulted in a slight improvement but this was much less than with the use of oral metronidazole.[62] Intravaginal boric acid in conjunction with other medications may be helpful in the treatment of recurrent BV.[60][63] TOL-463, a formulation of boric acid enhanced with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), is under development as an intravaginal medication for the treatment of BV and has shown preliminary effectiveness.[64][63][65][66]

Epidemiology

BV is the most common infection of the vagina in women of reproductive age.[5] The percentage of women affected at any given time varies between 5% and 70%.[8] BV is most common in parts of Africa, and least common in Asia and Europe.[8] In the United States, about 30% of those between the ages of 14 and 49 are affected.[15] Rates vary considerably between ethnic groups within a country.[8]

References

  1. ^ from the original on 10 September 2017.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g "What are the symptoms of bacterial vaginosis?". 21 May 2013. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
  3. ^ .
  4. ^ .
  5. ^ a b c d e f "Bacterial Vaginosis (BV): Condition Information". National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. 21 May 2013. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
  6. ^
    S2CID 19241611
    .
  7. ^ .
  8. ^ .
  9. ^ .
  10. ^ .
  11. ^ "What are the treatments for bacterial vaginosis (BV)?". National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. 15 July 2013. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 4 March 2015.
  12. ^
    PMID 24048183
    .
  13. ^ a b "Bacterial Vaginosis – CDC Fact Sheet". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 11 March 2014. Archived from the original on 28 February 2015. Retrieved 2 March 2015.
  14. PMID 17253567
    .
  15. ^ a b "Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Statistics Prevalence". cdc.gov. 14 September 2010. Archived from the original on 22 February 2015. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
  16. ^
    S2CID 222149236
    .
  17. .
  18. .
  19. ^ .
  20. ^ "STD Facts — Bacterial Vaginosis (BV)". CDC. Archived from the original on 3 December 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
  21. ^
    PMID 19821358
    .
  22. ^ "Bacterial vaginosis". National Health Service, UK. Archived from the original on 9 February 2014. Retrieved 3 October 2013.
  23. PMID 7491137
    .
  24. ^ .
  25. .
  26. ^ .
  27. .
  28. ^ .
  29. ^ .
  30. .
  31. .
  32. .
  33. .
  34. .
  35. ^ "Diseases Characterized by Vaginal Discharge". cdc.gov. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Archived from the original on 11 July 2017.
  36. S2CID 8304009
    .
  37. .
  38. .
  39. ^ a b "National guideline for the management of bacterial vaginosis (2006)". Clinical Effectiveness Group, British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH). Archived from the original on 3 November 2008. Retrieved 16 August 2008.
  40. PMID 22610702
    .
  41. .
  42. .
  43. .
  44. .
  45. .
  46. .
  47. .
  48. ^ "Bacterial Vaginosis – CDC Fact Sheet". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 11 March 2014. Archived from the original on 7 May 2015. Retrieved 6 May 2015.
  49. (PDF) from the original on 18 May 2015.
  50. ^ .
  51. .
  52. .
  53. .
  54. .
  55. .
  56. .
  57. ^ .
  58. ^ .
  59. ^ a b "CTV 05". AdisInsight. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
  60. ^ a b c d "Bacterial Vaginosis - STI Treatment Guidelines". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 19 July 2021.
  61. PMC 7271219
    .
  62. .
  63. ^ a b Sobel JD (28 November 2022). Marrazzo J, Barbieri RL, Eckler K (eds.). "Bacterial vaginosis: Initial treatment". UpToDate.
  64. ^ "TOL 463". AdisInsight. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
  65. S2CID 232325625
    .
  66. .

External links