Pherecydes of Syros
Pherecydes of Syros | |
---|---|
Φερεκύδης | |
Notable ideas | Metempsychosis, Time as Demiurge |
Pherecydes of Syros (
Pherecydes wrote a book on
Pherecydes' cosmogony forms a bridge between the mythological thought of
Life
Although it is relatively certain the Pherecydes was a native of the island of
According to a forged letter attributed to Thales, Pherecydes never traveled
There are many conflicting legends that purport to be an account of the death of Pherecydes. According to one story, Pherecydes was killed and skinned as a sacrifice by the Spartans, and their king kept the skin out of respect for Pherecydes' wisdom.
Influences
Pherecydes was designated as 'wise' (sophos), but only
Although this latter claim is almost certainly fictitious, it may be based on the similarity between Pherecydes' ideas and Eastern religious motifs. For example, in his book he describes an important battle in the earliest times between Kronos and
Writings
Pherecydes wrote a cosmogony (explanatory model for the origin of the universe) that contained a theogony, an explanatory model for the gods and their properties. This work broke with the mythological and theological tradition and shows Eastern influences. Pherecydes, along with Anaximander and Anaximenes, has long been regarded as one of the first Greek writers to compose his work in prose rather than hexameter verse.[13] Martin Litchfield West notes that the subject matter that all of three of these authors wrote on, the nature of the universe and how it came to be, had been written in verse prior to these authors.[13] West speculates based on the word choice that early logographers used ("words I have heard" instead of "I have read") that the original intent of a book written in prose was essentially a "write-up" of a lecture that a person interest in topics such as cosmology gave as a speech or public discourse.[13] The book was known variously under the titles such as Seven niches ( Heptamychos, Ἑπτάμυχος), "Five niches" (Pentemychos, Πεντέμυχος), and Mixing of the Gods (Theokrasia, Θεοκρασία).[r][14]
In this work, Pherecydes taught his philosophy through the medium of mythic representations. Although it is lost, it was extant in the Hellenistic period, and the fragments and testimony that survive from works that describe it are enough to reconstruct a basic outline. The opening sentence is given by Diogenes Laertius,[s] and two fragments in the middle of the text have also been preserved in fragments from a 3rd century Egyptian papyrus discovered by Bernard Pyne Grenfell and Arthur Surridge Hunt, which was identified thanks to a comment by Clement of Alexandria about the contents of Pherecydes' book: 'Pherecydes of Syros says: "Zas made a great and beautiful robe, and made the earth and Ogenus on it, and the palace of Ogenus".'[15]
Theogony
Pherecydes developed a unique,
The sequence of Pherecydes' creation myth is as follows. First, there are the eternal gods Zas (Zeus), Chthoniê (Gaia) and Chronos (Kronos). Then Chronos creates elements in niches in the earth with his seed, from which other gods arise. This is followed by the three-day wedding of Zas and Chthonie. On the third day Zas makes the robe of the world, which he hangs from a winged oak and then presents as a wedding gift to Chthonie, and wraps around her. The "winged oak" in this cosmology has no precedent in Greek tradition.
Etymology
Pherecydes was interested in etymology and word associations. Like Thales, he associated chaos with the primordial elemental water, presumably because he associates the word 'chaos' with the verb 'cheesthai', 'to flow out', and because chaos is an undefined, disorderly state.[t] By that approach he adapted god names, although Pherecydes probably saw his gods as traditional deities.[23] He mentioned Rhea for example Rhê,[u] presumably by association with rhein '(out)streams'.[24] The common names were in the 6th century BC. already traditional. In addition, the names are not a Greek dialect. The reason for deviant forms is to make them resemble other words and to construct an original form.[25]
- Zas resembles Zeus. One explanation is association with the prefix za- 'very', as in zatheos 'very divine'. An alternative is that the Luwian god Šanta was known as Sandes and Sandon. The Hittites identified it as the sky god, and the Greeks as Zeus or Heracles. Based on Zeus and Sandon with their associations, Pherecydes constructed a basic form with Zas-Zantos.[26] Zas (Zeus) is comparable with the Orphic Eros in function, as a personification of masculine sexual creativity. According to Proclus, "Pherecydes used to say that Zeus changed into Eros when about to create, for the reason that, having created the world from opposites, he led it into agreement and peace and sowed sameness in all things, and unity that interpenetrates the universe".[27]
- Chronos as time, the creator god, was unusual and is probably Eastern in origin. Phoenician myths and Zoroastrianism have a deified Time (Zurvan) that also creates without a partner with its seed, but leaves the concrete design of the physical world to another god.[28] The semen (seeds) of Chronos which can probably be considered as a watery chaos was placed in the recesses and composed numerous other offspring of gods.[29] This is described in a fragment preserved in Damascius' On First Principles. In later Greek poetry, Chronos (also called Aiōn) appears as personification.[30] Some Pherecydes fragments say Kronos, not Chronos. The association between the two figures is not traditional but may be correct. According to Hermias and Probus, Pherecydes did connect Chronos with Kronos, perhaps on etymological grounds.[v] After him Pindar[w] and Hellenistic orphism did this too.[23]
- Chthoniê comes from chthôn 'earth' and chthonios 'in/under the earth'. It concerns the invisible part of the dark, primitive earth mass. Gê, on the other hand, refers to the visible, differentiated A close relationship is thought to exist between these recesses and Chthonie.
- Ogenos, Okeanos/Oceanus. This non-Greek name is explained by the Akkadian uginna(circle) because Oceanus encircles the earth,
Cosmogony
The sequence of Pherecydes' cosmogony begins with the eternal gods Zas (Zeus), Chthoniê (Gê) and Chronos (Kronos), who "always existed." The first creation is an act of ordering in the cosmos through niches and division of the world. That creation coincides with the dichotomy of eternity-temporality and being-becoming. Chronos must step out of eternity to create, and creation means becoming.
The titles Penta-/Heptamychos and Theokrasia of the work indicate that niches (mychoi) and mixing are an important part of the creation story.
Fire, air and water are placed in the niches by Chronos and mixed (krasis). Mixing elements in five niches only makes sense if those mixtures are in different proportions. Contrary to later philosophy of Anaxagoras, the world is not created from the mixtures, but a second generation of gods (theokrasia), including Ophion. The formed gods derive their characteristics from the dominant element in each mixture and possibly associate them with the five regions.[41][44] The elements may also be a later, stoic reinterpretation of the text, as the elements, especially air/pneuma, appear anachronistic and fit within Aristotelian and Stoic physiology. That means Chronos' seed will go straight into the niches. This representation is possible, because in a scholium at the Iliad, for example, it says that Chronos smeared two eggs with his seed and gave it to Hera. She had to keep the eggs underground (kata gês) so that Typhon was born, the enemy of Zeus. Typhon is a parallel of Pherecydes' serpent god Ophion.[45]
Marriage between Zas and Chthoniê
It is quite possible that in the course of the theogony the primeval trio changed into the traditional Zeus, Kronos and Hera. Such changes have Orphic parallels: Rhea is Demeter after she becomes Zeus' mother,
The marriage of the gods is a union (
The robe hangs on a winged oak.
The mythical images of the tree as an earthly structure and a robe as a gift at marriage have Greek cultic counterparts. In
Theomachy
Pherecydes described a battle between Kronos and Ophion similar to that of Zeus and Typhon in Hesiod's older "Theogony". The stake of the battle is cosmic supremacy and is reminiscent of the Titanomachy and Gigantomachy of traditional theogony, in which the successive conflicts between gods are described with the current world order as a result. In Pherecydes' cosmogony, however, no initial chaos or tyranny is overcome, followed by the establishment of a new order. The creative gods are eternal and co-equal. Their order is temporarily threatened by Ophion, but that threat becomes a (re)affirmation of the divine order, with Kronos as the first king.[ae][57] The battle is also etiological, for it explained the myths about ancient sea monsters in both Greece and Asia Minor and the Middle East.[58] The battle is described by Celsus[af]:
'Pherecydes told the myth that an army was lined up against army, and he mentioned Kronos as leader of one, Ophion of the other, and he related their challenges and struggles, and that they agreed that the one who fell into Ogenos was the loser, while those who cast them out and conquered should possess the sky'.
Chronos has become Kronos here. Presumably, as a prominent second creator, Zas also participates in the battle, after which he becomes Zeus.[59] Ophion did not exist from the beginning but was born and had progeny of his own ( Ophionidai).[ag] He is serpentine, because his name is derived from ophis 'snake'. Traditionally, Gaia (Gê) was regarded as the mother of Typhon, and Chthoniê/Gê may be the mother of Ophion here. Ophion may also have been produced on her own in Tartarus, the cave under the earth.[60] Typhon also originated in a cave. Otherwise the father may be Chronos, because his seed is the niches of the earth.[61]
Ophion and its brood are often depicted as ruling the birthing cosmos for some time before falling from power. The chaotic forces are eternal and cannot be destroyed; instead they are thrown out from the ordered world and locked away in Tartaros in a kind of "appointment of the spheres", in which the victor (Zeus-Cronus) takes possession of the sky and of space and time.
Legacy
Pherycydes is seen as a transitional figure between the mythological cosmogonies of
Pythagoreanism
Out of all of the philosophers who were historical predecessors of Pythagoras, Pherycydes was the philosopher most often linked with him as one of his teachers.[64] Not many prose treatises existed in the 6th century, Pythagoras may have learned of Pherecydes' work and adopted the idea of reincarnation.[65] In Pythagoras' youth, when he still lived on Samos, he is said to have visited Pherecydes on Delos and later buried him.[aj] An early variant of this story places this event later in Pythagoras' life when he lived in Croton. His visit to the sick Pherecydes was used to explain his absence during Cylon's rebellion in that city.[66] These stories may have evolved from the story that Pythagoras was a student of Pherecydes.[67] According to Apollonius, Pythagoras imitated Pherecydes in his 'miracles'.[ak][68] The historicity of the connection between the two has been debated, however, because their philosophies are otherwise unrelated, and because Pythagoras has been attributed all kinds of teachers over time.[64] The confusion among later authors about the attribution of the miracles can perhaps be traced back to the poem of Ion of Chios.[69][al] Aristotle nevertheless stated in the 4th century BC that both were friends, and the story already about their friendship certainly dates back to the 5th century BC. It is believed that both philosophers once met.[64]
Pherecydes' book was thought to have contained a mystical esoteric teaching, treated allegorically. A comparatively large number of sources say Pherecydes was the first to teach the
Similarities with other cosmogonies
The theogony of Pherecydes also shows similarities with Orphic theogonies such as the
Notes
Primary
- ^ wikt:Πεντέμυχος, "of the five recesses"
- ^ "seven recesses"
- ^ DK 7A2
- ^ DK 7A1 §122
- ^ For a brief enumeration, see for example Munn 2006, p. 48, note 125
- ^ Hermippus, quoted in DK 7A2a
- ^ DK 7A1 §119
- ^ DK 7A1 § 116-117.
- ^ Plutarch, Pelopidas 21 , 2; Agis and Cleomenes 10, 3.
- ^ DK 7A1, § 117-118
- ^ Varia Historia, 4, 28.
- ^ Servius, In Vergilii Aeneidem commentarii, III, 76.
- ^ DK 7A5
- ^ DK 7A1 § 116, Iamblichus, Life of Pythagoras, §9, § 11.
- ^ DK 7A2
- ^ Clement of Alexandria, VI, 53, § 5.
- ^ DK 7B13
- ^ DK 7A8
- ^ DK 7A1 § 119
- ^ DK 7B1a
- ^ DK 7B9
- ^ DK 7A9 Also, Hermias, Irrisio gentilium philosophorum, 12.
- ^ Tenth Olympic ode, 49-55.
- Timaeus
- ^ Excerpt 145 by Proclus: 'She used to be Rhea, but as soon as she was called the mother of Zeus she became Demeter'.
- , IV, 166.
- ^ DK 7B3: 'Pherecydes once said that Zeus had turned into Eros when he wanted to create'. Also Maximus of Tyre, IV, 4.
- ^ Isidore the Gnostic, quoted by Clement of Alexandria (DK 7B2) Maximus of Tyre, IV, 4.
- ^ Hesiod, Theogony, 726ff.
- ^ According to Celsus, by Origen, Against Celsus, VI, 42 (DK 7B5).
- ^ Tertullian, The corona, 7 (DK 7B4).
- ^ DK 7B4. Also Maximus of Tyre, IV, 4.
- ^ In a scholium with Aristophanes' Clouds, 247, a first race of gods under Ophion and Eurynome is also mentioned.
- ^ DK 7A5
- ^ Plutarch, Sulla 36
- Dicaearchus.
- ^ Apollonius Paradoxographus, Historiae Mirabiles, 6.
- ^ The poem is given in DK 7A1 § 120.
- ^ Apponius, In Canticum Canticorum, 3, 5.
- ^ Numenius, quoted by Porphyry, DK 7B7
- ^ DK 7B6
- ^ Themistius, Orationes, 2, 38a-b.
Secondary
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 49.
- ^ Munn 2006, p. 51.
- ^ a b Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 52.
- ^ Schibli 1990, p. 11.
- ^ Munn 2006, p. 48.
- ^ Schibli 1990, p. 10.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 52–53.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 52, 68.
- ^ West 1971.
- ^ West 2007.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 52, 65–66.
- ^ West 1971, pp. 62–63.
- ^ a b c West 1971, p. 5.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 50, 58.
- ^ Purves 2010, p. 100.
- ^ Betegh 2004, pp. 219–220.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 55.
- ^ Schibli 1990, p. 15.
- ^ West 2007, p. 347.
- ^ a b Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 66.
- ^ a b Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 65–68.
- ^ Schibli 1990, pp. 89–90.
- ^ a b c Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 56.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 56–59.
- ^ a b West 1971, p. 50.
- ^ West 1971, pp. 51–52.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 62.
- ^ West 1971, pp. 28–34.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 56–60.
- ^ Schibli 1990, p. 30-31.
- ^ Munn 2006, p. 57.
- ^ Munn 2006, pp. 56–57.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 34.
- ^ a b Schibli 1990, p. 22.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 62, note 2.
- ^ West 1971, pp. 19, 49–50.
- ^ West 1997, p. 146.
- ^ Purves 2010, p. 107.
- ^ Schibli 1990, pp. 29–32.
- ^ Schibli 1990.
- ^ a b Schibli 1990, pp. 21–25.
- ^ Schibli 1990, pp. 32–33.
- ^ Schibli 1990, pp. 38–49.
- ^ a b Chase 2013, p. 31.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 57–59.
- ^ West 1971, p. 17.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 57.
- ^ Schibli 1990, pp. 51–53.
- ^ a b Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 61–62.
- ^ Purves 2010, pp. 103, 107-108..
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 62–65.
- ^ West 1971, pp. 20, 59.
- ^ West 1984, pp. 10–11.
- ^ West 1971, p. 73..
- ^ West 1971, p. 59.
- ^ West 1971, pp. 52–54.
- ^ Schibli 1990, pp. 87, 91, 99..
- ^ Schibli 1990, pp. 99–100.
- ^ Schibli 1990, pp. 97–98, 102.
- ^ Schibli 1990, p. 94.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 70.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 66–67.
- ^ Schibli 1990, pp. 20–21.
- ^ a b c Zhmud 2012, pp. 79–80.
- ^ Schibli 1990, p. 12.
- ^ Zhmud 2012, p. 79-80.
- ^ Schibli 1990, p. 13.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 50-51.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, pp. 51–52.
- ^ Schibli 1990, p. 104.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 59.
- ^ Schlibi 1990.
- ^ Schibli 1990, pp. 104–127.
- ^ West 1984, p. 108.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975, p. 60.
- ^ Schibli 1990, p. 108.
- ^ Chase 2013, p. 36.
- ^ Kirk & Raven 1975.
- ^ a b West 1984.
- ^ Chase 2013, p. 35.
- ^ Schibli 1990, p. 27..
- ^ West 1984, pp. 104–107.
References
Ancient Testimony
In the
- Diels, Hermann; Kranz, Walther (1957). Plamböck, Gert (ed.). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (in Ancient Greek, Latin, and German). Rowohlt. ISBN 5875607416..
Biography
- A1. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Vol. 1:1. Translated by Hicks, Robert Drew(Two volume ed.). Loeb Classical Library.
- A1a. Eusebius. Chronicon. 59.
- A2. "Pherecydes of Syros". Suda.
- A2a. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Vol. 1:1. Translated by Hicks, Robert Drew(Two volume ed.). Loeb Classical Library. § 42.
- A3. Geographia. p. 487.
- A4. Diodorus Siculus. Bibliotheca historica. X 3,4.
- A5. Tusculan Disputations. Book I, 16,38.
- A6. Eusebius. "That the Greeks were plagiarists. From Porphyry, The Lecture on Literature, Book I". Praeparatio evangelica.
- A7. Aristotle. Metaphysics. 1091b.
- A7a. Plotinus. "On the Three Primary Hypostases". Enneads. §9.
- A8. Damascius. Difficulties and Solutions of First Principles. 124b.
- A9. Probus. Commentary on Virgil's Bucolics. 6,31.
- A10. Sextus Empiricus. Pyrrhonic Hypotheses. Book III,§30.
- A11. Maximus of Tyre (1804). "Whether Poets Have Entertained Better Conceptions About the Gods than Philosophers". Dissertations.
- A12. Proclus. Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. 23c.
Fragments
- B1. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Vol. 1:1. Translated by Hicks, Robert Drew(Two volume ed.). Loeb Classical Library. § 119.
- B1a. Achilles Tatius. Introduction to the Phaenomena of Aratus. 31,28.
- B2. Grenfell-Hunt papyrus MS Gr. class. f.48[P]
- B3. Proclus. Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. 32c.
- B4. Origen. Contra Celsum. II, 111,13.
- B5. Origen. Contra Celsum. II, 112,20.
- B6. Porphyry. On the Cave of the Nymphs in the Odyssey.
- B7. ISBN 9781472501677.
- B8. Scholia to Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. I, 645.
- B9. Aelius Herodianus. On Peculiar Style. 7,4.
- B10. Apollonius Dyscolus. On Pronouns. 65,15.
- B11. Apollonius Dyscolus. On Pronouns. 93,1.
- B12. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Vol. 1:1. Translated by Hicks, Robert Drew(Two volume ed.). Loeb Classical Library. § 119.
- B13. Philodemus. On Piety. 47a.
- B13a. Plutarch. On the Face in the Moon. 938B.
Secondary sources
- Betegh, Gábor (5 August 2004). The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-80108-9.
- Chase, M. 'Discussions on the Eternity of the World in Antiquity and Contemporary Cosmology.' In: ΣΧΟΛΗ volume 7, 1, pp. 21-68.
- Fowler, R.L. 'The Authors Named Pherecydes'. In: Mnemosyne, volume 52, 1, pp. 1-15.
- Kirk, Geoffrey Stephen; Raven, John Earle (1975) [1957]. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. University Press. ISBN 978-1-5175-5798-0.
- Munn, Mark Henderson (2006). The Mother of the Gods, Athens, and the tyranny of Asia: a study of sovereignty in ancient religion. University of California Press. pp. 48–50. ISBN 978-0-520-24349-1.
- Purves, Alex C. (22 March 2010). Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-48798-6.
- Schibli, Hermann S. (1990). Pherekydes of Syros. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-814383-3.
- West, Martin Litchfield (1971). Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient. At the Clarendon Press.
- West, Martin Litchfield (1984). The Orphic Poems. Clarendon Press.
- West, Martin Litchfield (1997). The East Face of Helicon: West Asiatic Elements in Greek Poetry and Myth. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-815042-8.
- ISBN 978-0-19-928075-9
- Zhmud, Leonid (31 May 2012). Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0-19-928931-8.
Further reading
- Guthrie, W.K.C. Orpheus and Greek Religion. A Study of the Orphic Movement.” Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993 (1952).
- Santamaria, Marco (2019). "Pherecydes of Syros in the Papyrological Tradition". In Christian Vassallo (ed.). Presocratics and Papyrological Tradition: A Philosophical Reappraisal of the Sources. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. pp. 91–110. ISBN 9783110666106. Retrieved 13 February 2023.