United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540
UN Security Council Resolution 1540 | ||
---|---|---|
Date | 28 April 2004 | |
Meeting no. | 4,956 | |
Code | S/RES/1540 (Document) | |
Subject | Non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction | |
Voting summary |
| |
Result | Adopted | |
Security Council composition | ||
Permanent members | ||
Non-permanent members | ||
|
United Nations Security Council resolution 1540 was adopted unanimously on 28 April 2004 regarding the non-proliferation of
It is notable in that it recognizes non-state proliferation as a threat to the peace under the terms of Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, and creates an obligation for states to modify their internal legislation.
Furthermore, the resolution requires every state to criminalize various forms of non-state actor involvement in weapons of mass destruction and its related activities in its domestic legislation and, once in place, to enforce such legislation. By virtue of its universal scope and mandatory nature, resolution 1540 marks a departure from previous nonproliferation arrangements and adds a novel layer to the nonproliferation regime. Before the resolution was adopted, the non-proliferation regime was based on many partly overlapping arrangements, none of which established universal mandatory obligations.[2]
Content
Resolution 1540 was adopted under
1540 is only the second resolution to invoke Chapter VII without relating the fact to a specific time and place, the first being United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373, which was voted in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks as an attempt to counter international terrorism. The possibility of terrorists accessing WMD was already considered in Resolution 1373 paragraph 3a and 4, and UNSCR 1540 emerged from those two paragraphs.[4]
The three main obligations created by the resolution are:
- To "refrain from providing any form of support to non-State actors that attempt to develop, acquire, manufacture, possess, transport, transfer or use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and their means of delivery." (Article 1)
- To "adopt and enforce appropriate effective laws which prohibit any non-State actor to manufacture, acquire, possess, develop, transport, transfer or use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and their means of delivery". (Article 2)
- To "take and enforce effective measures to establish domestic controls to prevent the proliferation of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons and their means of delivery". (Article 3)
The resolution also emphasises the continuing importance of
The 1540 Committee was deliberately created without the power to impose sanctions. While the resolution is, in theory, obligatory for all members of the UN, it was decided that the implementation process should be based on collaboration and participation rather than enforcement. To further these ends, one of the main functions of the committee has been as a "clearing house" of offers and requests for assistance in fulfilling obligations created by the resolution.[5]
1540 committee
An ad-hoc committee (known as 1540 committee) for an initial mandate of 2 years under the Security Council charging the examination on the implementation of this resolution was established under paragraph 4 of the resolution. The committee released its first report to the Security Council on implementation of the resolution in April 2006. With the adoptions of Resolution 1673 (2006) and later Resolution 1810 (2008), its mandate was extended for a further two years and then another period of three years. Its mandate was extended for a further ten years by Resolution 1977 (2011), adopted in April 2011. The committee presented a second report in July 2008. As requested in Resolution 1810 (2008), the committee held an open meeting in 2009 with broad participation in order to prepare a comprehensive review of the status of the implementation of Resolution 1540.
National implementation
The resolution calls upon all States to present to the 1540 Committee a first report, not later than six-month from the adoption of the resolution 1540 (28 October 2004), on steps they have taken or intend to take to implement the provisions of operative paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the resolution. All Member States are also called upon to include in their national reports,[6] as appropriate, information relating to the implementation of operative paragraphs 6,7,8, 9 and 10 of the resolution. They are also encouraged to prepare on a voluntary basis summary action plans mapping out their priorities and plans for implementing the key provisions of resolution 1540 (2004), and to submit those plans to the 1540 Committee.[7] The resolution 1810 (2008) calls upon all States that have not yet presented a first report to as required in the resolution 1540 to submit it to the 1540 Committee without delay.
Negotiations and vote
Resolution 1540 was adopted by the
Resolution 1540 is a notable development both in that it explicitly recognises non-state
The resolution was sponsored by the United States, with the
The resolution was voted unanimously by the permanent members of the Security Council, plus the 10 non-permanent members at the time: Algeria, Benin, Angola, the Philippines, Pakistan, Brazil, Chile, Germany, Spain and Romania. The entire process, from the beginning of negotiations among the co-sponsors to the final vote took around 8 months.[10]
Despite the unanimity of the vote several
Speaking for
Equally, the early drafts of the resolution contained explicit references to the
Relationship to other non-proliferation instruments
Resolution 1540 requires states to "promote the universal adoption and full implementation, and, where necessary, strengthening of multilateral treaties to which they are parties, whose aim is to prevent the
Although the resolution encourages and promotes universal
Resolution 1540 tries to fill gaps in the varying approaches of existing instruments.[16] First of all, the resolution is universal unlike the three main WMD treaties. Whereas the three main WMD treaties, the
Similarly, for the
Nuclear weapons
Resolution 1540 has a complementary relationship to the
Chemical weapons
The
Biological weapons
As said before, the
Means of delivery
UNSCR 1540 promotes a greater understanding of non-proliferation instruments related to means of delivery such as the
Application
South America
Latin America was the first region to be covered by a treaty banning the development of nuclear weapons (the
While
All of the states in the region have already presented their compliance reports to the 1540 Committee. Many of them have, however, fulfilled only a minor part of their obligations under the resolution; Chile, Panama, Peru and Venezuela being among those with the worst records.[24] Colombia has also requested detection equipment and assistance in training its law enforcement personnel in the detection and prosecution of proliferation offenses,[5] while Argentina and Brazil have provided offers of assistance.[25]
Asia and Oceania
While
and for being far too demanding in terms of resources for small countries to implement correctly.Among the states of the region, Taiwan (which is not a UN member), the Cook Islands and Niue (which are treated as permanent observers rather than members of the UN due to their links with New Zealand), North Korea, Burma, East Timor and the Solomon Islands have yet to present reports to the 1540 Committee. Many of the states in Oceania have had difficulties fulfilling their obligations under the resolution due to their small size and lack of resources. For example, Kiribati has asked for assistance in adapting its legislative framework[28] and Vanuatu has asked for additional police training.[29]
Armenia, Cambodia, Iraq, Lebanon, the Marshall Islands, Mongolia, the Philippines, Qatar, Syria, Thailand and Uzbekistan all currently have requests for assistance pending,[5] while Australia, China, India, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, South Korea, and Singapore have all presented offers of assistance to the committee.[25]
Many states in the region are also involved in other local
Asia has been the source of most recent proliferation activities, notably in
Africa
While most African states lack the technology to be serious
Africa also has the highest proportion of states not yet having presented their compliance reports to the 1540 committee.
This has largely been attributed to a lack of resources, and the existence of more pressing problems such as AIDS,
Europe
Since 2003 the
The only European countries yet to present their reports to the 1540 committee are
North America
The United States has been one of the strongest supporters of resolution 1540 and of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1887,[44] which strengthened its provisions.[45]
All North American states except
Controversy
Many states in the
Supporters of the resolution have underlined the function of the 1540 committee as a clearing house for offers of and requests for assistance in implementing the resolution,[44] and pointed out that improved border controls and legislative framework will be of a more general benefit to all countries that implement them.[47]
See also
- Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation
- Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
- List of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1501 to 1600 (2003–2005)
- Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty
- Terrorism
References
- ^ "1540 Committee". United Nations. Archived from the original on 20 February 2020. Retrieved 11 February 2021.
- ^ Heupel, Monika (2007). "Implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1540: A division of labour strategy" (PDF). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 87. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 December 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2010.
- ^ "Note by President of the Security Council". United Nations. 31 January 1992. Archived from the original on 22 September 2020. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
- ^ Van Ham, P and Bosch O: "Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism: The Role of Resolution 1540 and Its Implications", Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism, 8.
- ^ a b c d e f "Home | 1540 Committee | United Nations". Archived from the original on 5 December 2011. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
- ^ 1540 Committee (2013). "National Reports". un.org. Archived from the original on 19 June 2021. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ http://www.stimson.org/mab/pdf/Next100Report2009.pdf [dead link]
- ^ a b "La Résolution 1540 du Conseil de sécurité (28 avril 2004) entre la prolifération des armes de destruction massive, le terrorisme et les acteurs non étatiques - Centre Thucydid..." January 2005. Archived from the original on 3 August 2016. Retrieved 26 May 2010.
- ^ "Security Council Resolution 1540: WMD and Non-state Trafficking | Acronym Institute". Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- PMID 16000049. Archived from the original on 6 August 2021. Retrieved 25 May 2010.)
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help - ^ "Security Council Decides All States Shall Act To Prevent Proliferation Of Mass Destruction Weapons". Archived from the original on 17 June 2021. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
- ^ "STATEMENT BY MR. V.K. NAMBIAR, PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE, ON NON-PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AT THE SECURITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 22, 2004" (PDF). Archived from the original on 19 September 2012. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ "United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 Database". Archived from the original on 30 August 2011. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ Van Ham, P and Bosch O: "Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism: The Role of Resolution 1540 and Its Implications", Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism, 15.
- ^ Van Ham, P and Bosch O: "UNSCR 1540: Its Future and Contribution to Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism", Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism, 218–219.
- ^ Van Ham, P and Bosch O: "Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism: The Role of Resolution 1540 and Its Implications", Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism, 9–20.
- ^ Rauf, T and Lodding J.: "UNSCR 1540 and the Role of the IAEA", Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism, 86–95.
- ^ Manly, R: " Restricting Non-State Actors' Access to Chemical Weapons and Related Materials: Implications for UNSCR 1540", Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism, 73–85.
- ^ Woodward, A: "The Biological Weapons Convention and UNSCR 1540", Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism, 96–112.
- ^ Whiteside, T: "UNSCR 1540 and means of delivery", Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism, 113–121.
- ^ "China's Case Against the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty: rationality and morality - HUNT - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy - Wiley Online Library". Archived from the original on 20 October 2012. Retrieved 23 February 2019.
- ^ "Home | IIP Digital | U.S. Department of State". Archived from the original on 25 October 2011. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ "Declaration of San Carlos". Archived from the original on 25 March 2021. Retrieved 25 May 2019.
- S2CID 143084674.
- ^ a b c d e "Home | 1540 Committee | United Nations". Archived from the original on 28 October 2011. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
- ^ a b "Links to documents". Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 20 February 2022.
- ^ "Asian Security". Taylor & Francis. Archived from the original on 6 August 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2020.
- ^ "Report by the Republic of Kiribati as required by operative paragraph 4 of Security Council resolution 1540 (2004)". undocs.org. United Nations. Archived from the original on 19 August 2018. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
- ^ "Report of the Republic of Vanuatu on actions taken by the Government to implement Security Council resolution 1540 (2004)". undocs.org. United Nations. Archived from the original on 19 August 2018. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
- ^ "Bali Regional Ministerial Meeting on Counter-Terrorism". Archived from the original on 14 September 2012. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 March 2012. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ "India and Pakistan - On the Nuclear Threshold". Archived from the original on 20 March 2015. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ "Nuclear Weapons - Israel". Archived from the original on 21 August 2021. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ "Iran's Nuclear Program". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 9 June 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
- ^ "Center for Defense Information". Archived from the original on 9 January 2021. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ "A.Q. Khan Nuclear Chronology" (PDF). Archived from the original on 5 August 2012. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ "Libyan Nuclear Weapons". Archived from the original on 29 August 2011. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ "Nuclear Weapons Program - Egypt". Archived from the original on 8 February 2019. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ "Volume 5, Number 4—August 1999 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC". Archived from the original on 4 September 2011. Retrieved 17 September 2017.
- ^ a b https://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/sc8964.doc.htm Archived 17 June 2021 at the Wayback Machine Security Council Affirms Determination To Strengthen Cooperation Aimed At Countering Nuclear, Chemical, Biological Weapons Proliferation]
- ^ "The EU's approach to tackling the proliferation of materials and weapons of mass destruction and prospects for cooperation on the eve of a new US administration" (PDF). DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION DIRECTORATE B. 5 November 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 June 2019. Retrieved 20 February 2022 – via European Parliament.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 September 2019. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ "Securing the Bomb | NTI Projects | About NTI | NTI". Archived from the original on 2 January 2011. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- ^ a b "Text of Security Council Resolution 1887 (2009)". undocs.org. United Nations. Archived from the original on 9 July 2021. Retrieved 11 March 2017.
- ^ "Fact Sheet on the United Nations Security Council Summit on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Nuclear Disarmament UNSC Resolution 1887 | The White House". 24 September 2009. Archived from the original on 6 August 2021. Retrieved 2 March 2021.
- ^ "UN Security Council Resolution 1540 Part II: The Caribbean States: A Case Study". Archived from the original on 18 January 2011. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ "UNIDIR - Publications". Archived from the original on 1 August 2012. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
External links
- Text of the Resolution at undocs.org
- 1540 Committee website
- Final document on the 2009 comprehensive review of the status of implementation of Security Council resolution 1540 (2004): key findings and recommendations
- UN Security Council Resolution 1540 at www.state.gov
- United Nations Regional Centre for Peace, Disarmament and Development in Latin America and the Caribbean (UNLIREC)