User talk:Piotrus/Archive 40

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi there, could you take a look at Grandiose's comments on copyright of photos you uploaded to commons here? I'm not an expert and I'm not sure what is it that he really want. //Halibutt 22:37, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I took a look at Staszic and did a quick ce, adding some {{who}} tags here and there. Sadly, I wouldn't feel comfortable assessing the article myself as I can't really tell much of the prose. Not a native speaker. //Halibutt 20:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

This horse never dies apparently. Would you mind?. I mean the question No. 2: "File:The_fighting_near_Radzymin.jpg: what steps have been taken to look for previous publication? Same for other images from that source". Any ideas? I must say I also liked the questions about the architect of the church depicted on one of the photos. //Halibutt 21:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

You appear to have left various split/merge tags on these pages. Do you intend to update these articles? Op47 (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm aware of the merge issues that have been raised. What keeps it from happening is that History of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (1764–1795), the third and last of the detailed History of Commonwealth series is not finished, as I'm being distracted by several other projects. May be I should prioritize this work to get the Commonwealth situation cleaned up. Orczar (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

I've made new suggestions under

Talk:History of Poland in the Early Modern era. Orczar (talk

) 15:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Hopefully inside the next 5 days we launch a new website with the first of 5 printed booklets on anti-Polish sentiment. I planned to inform Wiki Polish editors encase they can use it. Jniech (talk) 22:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm the anonymous editor that recently got involved in a coupe disputes regarding the editing style on a coupe of pages such as Haller's Blue Army and Poland Armed Forces. As a casual user of Wikipedia I was unsettled by editing which I consider as bias towards polish subject matter. When comparing pages on similar topics I noticed that the language used on pages related to a polish topics used much harder (judgmental) terms, and the phraseology used created a subtle, but clear bias towards Poles that presents them in a negative way.

One example was the recent Buckshot06 edits on Polish Armed Forces page, when I stumbled on this page there was only one picture in the "History" section, and it showed Polish soldiers in a diminutive way that only invited negative and stereoscopical perceptions. So, I added the current pictures which show the Polish military in a respectable, but neutral way. Now, user Buckshot06 is trying to remove them one at a time, by claiming that they have nothing to do with the text.

Another, editing issue that I'm involved in is that of American football coach Jerry Sandusky who was accused of child abuse. Sandusky himself is an American first... of mixed Polish and Irish descent. But, the page only mentioned his Polish roots omitting his Irish ancestry, and when his Irish ancestry was added, administrator Milowent was insistent on only highlighting Sandusky's Polish roots first, as if the man was 100% Polish. Please see the edits below to see how he keeps changing the page structure to highlight this, and in the most recent edit he locked the page despite the fact that no vandalism or edit warring took place.

1st edit: Sandusky was born in Washington, Pennsylvania, the only son of Evelyn Mae (née Lee) and Arthur Sandusky. His paternal grandparents were Polish immigrants and his mother came from a small coal-mining town.

2nd edit (neutral): Sandusky was born in Washington, Pennsylvania, the only son of Evelyn Mae (née Lee) an Irish Catholic homemaker who came from a small Pennsylvania coal-mining town, and Arthur Sandusky who's parents immigrated from Poland.

...and this is what the section was changed to (below). It seems strange how in this case someone wants too highlight the man's Polish root, even if it means that the structure of the text is moved in a incoherent way, since the earlier sections listed the mother first, than the father, and proceeded to list the father's accomplishments, Also, how many times is the editor going to try to use Poland or Polish in one sentence, it seems like he's trying to fill the page with this fact.

3rd edit: Sandusky was born in Washington, Pennsylvania, the only son of Arthur Sandusky, whose Polish parents had immigrated from Poland, and Evelyn Mae (née Lee) an Irish Catholic homemaker who came from a small Pennsylvania coal-mining town.

Now, since the page is locked, I'm not able to revert the changes, and I can't constantly argue with an administrator who clearly has more power to block IP's or lock pages. And, to prove my point of a bias, don't see any mention of Polish ancestry on pages related to other football players/coaches such as Mike Ditka, Don Majkowski, or Rob Gronkowski. Yet, in the case of child abuser Jerry Sandusky his polish background is highlighted and edited to maintain this bias. --76.118.227.161 (talk) 02:01, 4 December 2011

There's always the WP category for "Polish bank robbers". PЄTЄRS J V ►TALK 20:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Volunteer Marek's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

If you set up a questionnaire sandbox, I'll fill out. Best, PЄTЄRS J V ►TALK 19:13, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Never mind, added mine to the sandbox! PЄTЄRS J V ►TALK 20:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Ay, with this [1] you're making me feel bad. I'll try to do some of these soon. One thing though that has turned me of is that the particular time period that is being dealt with - 18th century - is both one that I'm not all that familiar with and one that, relatedly, not that interested in.VolunteerMarek 00:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

I've thought of organizing the various charts into genres such as rock, country, dance, pop, etc. It would at the same time split

Hi. When you recently edited Wisława Szymborska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Party line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I've thought of organizing the various charts into genres such as rock, country, dance, pop, etc. It would at the same time split

Hi. When you recently edited Wisława Szymborska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Party line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

It's time to schedule the February outreach:Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting. Please add your availability to this Doodle by February 15 so we can schedule the meeting at a time that the most people are available. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 22:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I was reading the University Times on-line and saw your quotes. Great job and thanks for taking a stand. CrazyPaco (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Poland for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 08:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I noticed the info on the noticeboard and thought that - since you are probably the only wikipedian actively involved with WP:PL, there would be no better person than yourself. Certainly I'm not the one as technically speaking I'm not even a member :) //Halibutt 20:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, Piotr. I hope that you take the time to participate in the interview. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 06:13, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

You should also direct Vecrumba to the interview (if you haven't already). I don't know if he has listed himself as a project member, but he certainly contributes a good bit.VolunteerMarek 18:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I "promoted" myself to more active status. :-) PЄTЄRS J V ►TALK 19:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Okay, you won, I added my 2 groszes :) //Halibutt 23:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello again! I uploaded the finished files and you can see them at

• 
  Armia krajowa
• 
  2nd Berlin map

I closed the Map Workshop request as "resolved" so there's no need to reply there. As for the Berlin defences map, I've already started working on it. I'm trying to overlay it on a map of the city to make it possible to add more useful details. The Z sector was very easy to figure out, while the second line traces several water bodies closely. I also found a decent map of Berlin in 1945 that shows the extent of the urban area, but if you have a good one and can find a detailed description of the lines it would greatly increase accuracy. Later, we'll be able to use this as a basis for other maps illustrating the battle inside Berlin. Cheers! -- Orionist ★ talk 05:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Czesc. When is the deadline for the interview? I would like to contribute, but until tomorrow evening I am kinda busy. - Darwinek (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I checked a few books, but found only descriptions, not numbers. Orczar (talk) 14:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi! What've I done? I've been a lazy sloth of late except Calais and a few jazz stubs.. Ja kitty looks quite spiteful..♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Please join us for the February edition of the Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting. Join us on WebEx on Wednesday, February 22 at 16:00 UTC. See outreachwiki:Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting for instructions on joining and a time zone converter. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk)

P.S. You'll notice we're delivering this notice through Global message delivery, which means you can choose to have this message delivered to your home wiki's talk page. If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, please update your subscription.

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Grunwald (painting) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Kingdom of Poland

Gunparade March (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aomori

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Is created :-) CrazyPaco (talk) 11:28, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the {{

Additionally, I have an open request for feedback (Wikipedia:Help_desk#Requesting_general_review_by_non-creator_for_new_article) if you have specific concerns about the article's content. I appreciate any feedback a senior editors such as yourself may have. Thanks. DotHectate (talk) 20:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. It's pretty much the same as what User:Captain_Screebo recommended on the help desk page so obviously moving some of the EL to references where appropriate is going to be higher on my to-do list. Thanks again. DotHectate (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

The new version of the German Camps, Polish Victims website is now live. http://germancampspolishvictims.info/ It has the first of the associated booklets called “German camps, Polish Victims: The BBC coverage of German occupied Poland” available for free download. This 64 page booklet outlines what studying over 500 pages on the BBC website found.

If time please check out the site and download the booklet. Any comments on either would be appreciated. The booklet goes to the printer end of next week, so any comments on its content and format would be useful. Note: the cover is still missing due to it needing to be converted to PDF but I don’t have the software at present.

Perhaps the link to the web site could be added to Polish "Polish death camp" controversy or the Anti-Polish sentiment articles on Wiki Jniech (talk) 15:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

You said: Interesting project, I'll take a look. Have you considered releasing your content under a Wikipedia-compatible license?

This project is why I am not active on Wikipedia. Can you direct me to “Wikipedia-compatible license” details? I am happy for the material to be used on Wikipedia. Jniech (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not publish original research – Is not my booklet original research? Still can’t others use it? It is fully referenced and I am seen as an expert inside the Polish community e.g. my recent award. Jniech (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

I can't see the justification for your argument for reversion. In archive 9, arguments from both yourself and Itsmejudith indicate the section shouldn't be present. As such I've started a discussion on the talk page, please comment. Fifelfoo (talk) 23:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Piotrus, the draft for the upcoming (Feb 27) issue is here and your contributions would be most welcome! The list of papers to cover is here.

And thanks again for your work last time. BTW, I notified Greenstein and Zhu of the review of their paper and got a very nice reply.

Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 09:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

I had indeed looked briefly at the "Sciencepaper" paper (haven't had another chance since then, though) and indeed the quality issues at least regarding the writing were obvious. But I thought that they might have something interesting to to say, at least in the sense that the paper contains information that would not otherwise be accessible to non-Chinese speakers. In any case, even bad papers should be covered in the research newsletter; this can save the reader a lot of time ;)

I have added several more papers (CSCW 2012 took place this month), two of which may interest you in particular: [2] (seems essentially a social sciences paper), and [3](slides - I see to recall you have also used Wikipedia in your teaching).

Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 02:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your note. I did not really see this as DYK material, since it is mostly a collection of lists of names. And I can't think of any tagline. I was more using it as a sort of "to do" checklist: see how many redlinks I could turn blue. But if you would care to submit it, I would be delighted. I think it is "clean" in the sense of being fully-sourced, having no copyright violations and having more than enough non-list text. :~) Aymatth2 (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

nominate ) 08:03, 24 February 2012 (UTC) A cupcake for you! Hello! I'm Bibid, and I appreciate all that you've done for us regarding the pursuit of knowledge. Your articles are so intriguing and informative! :) Bibid (talk) 03:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC) DYK for University Times On 25 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article University Times, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the University Times, a newspaper of the University of Pittsburgh, was threatened with closure when it covered a heated dispute among the faculty and administration in 1979? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/University Times. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. General sejm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver ) added links pointing to Inflanty and Liw Greg Bear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Blood Music Sociological theory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Peter Berger It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 26 February 2012 (UTC) DYK nomination of Feeder of lice Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk ) 00:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC) DYK for Foucauldian discourse analysis nominate ) 10:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC) WMF's "rate this page" I opened a discussion of the WMF's "rate this page" initiative to recruit editors from readers. Such recruitment "surveys" are prohibited by the ethical code of public-opinion researchers. Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 22:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC) Hi Piotrus, This may interest you and the others in the Wikipedia Research Project, which seemed to hide from me as my eyes bled from the strain of reading your user page. ;;) For relaxation, I'm going to read a paper by K. C. Kiwiel, preferably typeset in a SIAM Journal. ;;D Cheers,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 23:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 27 February 2012 News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction Featured content: By plane, by ship, and by stagecoach: Featured content goes trekking this week Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 01:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC) WikiCup 2012 February newsletter Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was Grapple X (submissions), again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was Tigerboy1966 (submissions), thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were Ruby2010 (submissions), Cwmhiraeth (submissions), Miyagawa (submissions) and Casliber (submissions). February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from Ruby2010 (submissions). At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher. The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design. The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email ) 00:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC) tb Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Volunteer Marek's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. I'm on Piotrus' talk page to discover if I should thank "Piotrus" (he/she whatever) for creating User Talk Page:Winston Trechane. That's I. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winston Trechane (talk • contribs) 14:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Go away, stay gone. Stay off my talk page.Shajure (talk) 13:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC) This is not optional and is not a request. Stay off. Not add it and then delete it. Stay. Off. No, I will not "tone down", and don't need to: This is toned down. If you don't understand, you may want to see the block history of those who don't accept this injunction. If you have some overwhelming urge to continue this discussion, feel free to do it here.Shajure (talk) 14:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC) Do not ever again post on my talk page. In the the more general case, do not incorrectly warn other users. Seek guidance which you desperately need. "If you don't understand, you may want to see the block history of those who don't accept this injunction." - If you think this is a threat, you need to consider some other way to spend your time. Now to be clear: STAY OFF MY TALK PAGE!!!!! Shajure (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC) ANI thread You have been mentioned in a thread at wp:ANI Shajure (talk ) 20:33, 1 March 2012 (UTC) Radzymin Good idea. //Halibutt 01:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC) Merging Commonwealth history articles I merged the texts of the two articles. The technical merge, which will eliminate the now duplicate History of Poland (1569–1795) needs to be done. However the last time I did merges I did something wrong and the history on one of the articles was missing or something like that. May be you could do the merge itself, to avoid this problem. Thank you. Orczar (talk ) 17:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 5 Hi. When you recently edited General sejm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piotrków (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject . It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC) A Barnstar for you! The Barnstar of European Merit awarded to Piotrus, who have contributed tirelessly with excellent edits in a broad variety of articles related to the European Union and Europe in general. Poeticbent talk 18:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC) this WikiAward was given to Piotrus by Poeticbent talk on 18:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC) β-testing Hi! You indicated you'd like to help us beta-test the new MediaWiki 1.19 extension for the Education Program. Click here to get started. Thanks, Rob SchnautZ (WMF) (talk • contribs) 18:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC) ---- Stec photo taken in 1946 Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_execution_in_D%C4%99bica_(1946)#A_legendary_photo I'd be happy to contribute a copy of the Stec photo taken in 1946 for this page since it is no longer available at the Debica link. I'm not a frequent contributor and have no idea where to send it. Contact me if you have an interest in the 1946 Stec photo. Dennis Benarz [email protected] Editor, http://spuscizna.org/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.39.235.114 (talk) 03:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Silesian Military District Some well-meaning wikipedians, plus myself as the originator, have managed to make a bit of a mess of the original Polish translation of this article. Would you mind taking a look at the original and the now translation? Many thanks -- can help as much as I'm able to with this. Buckshot06 (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 05 March 2012 News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles Featured content: Best of the week Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open Technology report: With the 1.19 deployment now (mostly) complete, developers consider possible "mini" deployment later in the month Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 16:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Kaytek the Wizard Further information: User talk:Nbarth § Kaytek the Wizard Further information: User talk:Nbarth/Archive 2012 § Kaytek the Wizard Hi Piotrus, No problem, and thanks for the support! I’m not very familiar with the book (I’ve only read the first few chapters, in a friend’s translation), so it would be hard for me to expand the article much. Once I’ve read the whole book, I could add a plot summary, but (presumably since the book is not yet available in English), there are essentially no English references, other than mentioning the title, so the article is hard to expand. I plan to read the book in the near future (friend’s translation), and see if I can find any other references, but likely can’t expand the article much. Any help you could provide (esp. Polish references) would be much appreciated! (Please have a crack at it if you’d like.) The Polish Wikipedia page also isn’t very detailed, but any information from there would be welcome. BTW, one weird point – it’s unclear whether the book was originally published in 1934 or 1935 (sources differ, one even gives 1934/35); would be nice if it could be cleared up, but I’m not holding my breath. Thanks again! —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 23:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the great expansion! I copied the text about “as popular as Harry Potter” from the Janusz Korczak page, where it was also uncited. I’ve remove/reworded this, just stating that it was “highly popular”, and made a few minor edits. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC) DYK proposal posted at DYK nominations: March 4 , and reproduced below. Feel free to propose alternative hooks, and thanks for the push! —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 08:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC) DYK for Feeder of lice feeders of lice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Feeder of lice. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC) MOTDs ( This space for rent ) You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –pjoef (talk • contribs ) 12:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Znaniecki florian.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Znaniecki florian.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 20:45, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Disamming I try to be but that's also a 2 year old edit :) --User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 05:13, 8 March 2012 (UTC) Alfred Jahn I've noticed that there seems to be a good bit of info on Alfred Jahn, on which I've been working, in various Wyborcza articles but I can't access them. If you can see the actual articles then the article could use some help - particularly I think the stuff about his role in the 1968 protests could expandin'. If not any other help with it would be appreciated.VolunteerMarek 02:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Pakistan FAC Hi, I was advised by one of the reviewers to ask active FAC editors to review the Pakistan article's FAC at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pakistan/archive1‎. It has been out for nine days, the problems mentioned in the start were fixed but there have been no further comments. There was a question about a dispute that occurred after the nomination, I've explained about it on the FAC page that there's been no consensus for it on the talk page and the current version is as of consensus. Please take a look at the article and drop your review comments and/or vote. Thanks. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Social problems The article Social problems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: This article is a list of categories and articles that have now been included in Category:Social Problems. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons . You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meclee (talk) 21:40, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Talkback Thanks for the note about Social problems. Twinkle automagically notified you. Category:Social_problems has been created to hold the articles or major categories of articles, as there are often university courses with this title. I accidentally nominated Social issues for deletion, but have made a note of that error for admins. Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Meclee's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Meclee (talk ) 22:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Zygmunt Kaczkowski Hey Piotrus, through chance rather than wisdom I managed to create an article on a Polish author. I browsed around but could not find any English-language sources through Google News and Books (I may well have the wrong spelling, of course). Maybe you can do something with it... Drmies (talk) 00:08, 10 March 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 12 Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. General sejm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver ) added links pointing to Kingdom of Poland and Kamień Kaytek the Wizard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Race Sejm of the Congress Poland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver ) added a link pointing to Simple majority Sejm of the Duchy of Warsaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Simple majority It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC) Scheduling March Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting It's time to schedule the March Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting. If you're interested in joining us, please add your availability to this Doodle by Wednesday, 14 March, at 17:00 UTC. If you're interested in volunteering to lead the meeting, please leave a message on my talk page! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) P.S. You'll notice we're delivering this notice through Global message delivery, which means you can choose to have this message delivered to your home wiki's talk page. If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, please update your subscription. Subscribe/unsubscribe · Distributed via Global message delivery, 18:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC) A pie for you! For twisting my arm 6 months back to learn to add Talk page templates, I now can't live without them. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC) DYK for Kaytek the Wizard nominate ) 22:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC) Women Love Diamonds I've replied at Template:Did you know nominations/Women Love Diamonds Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC) Labour Party (Poland) Hi, Peter! I have added the basic information from this disambig page to the Labour Party disambig page under the current and historic Poland subtitles. Is there anything left useful for the Labor Party (Poland) disambig page to exist? --DThomsen8 (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC) I'd merge it. Good, but what to do, exactly? It seems to me that I have already merged the information, and what may remain is to delete the Labor Party (Poland) disambig page completely. --DThomsen8 (talk) 17:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks Thanks for the kind words and encouragement. The article on Polish camps needs a lot of work, and I am currently busy like hell, and I simply have no time to work on it. I have plenty of ideas for new articles, and way too little time. Greetings. Tymek (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks ... ... for your help on my home page. I've now taken it the next step to what I wanted (as best I now understand it; not delving too deeply). Being more schooled, now, maybe, I can refer one here to the Manual of Style's description of what you provided me. A small observation re: your own page here: Is the reference to "Archive 36" as the auto-archive-destination correct or out-of-date? I quail to propose the latter in the face of your immense contributions/apparent-Wiki-sophistication but, Maybe. No need for an answer. (But if I link to this, I want to know where to link, right? :-)) Anyway, thanks again. Swliv 00:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Glad to reciprocate! Swliv (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 12 March 2012 Interview: Liaising with the Education Program Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators News and notes: Sue Gardner tackles the funds, and the terms of use update nears implementation In the news: Britannica runs out of print as Jimmy Wales anointed UK transparency tsar Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education Technology report: Git learning curve steep but not insurmountable, plus a diff style we can all agree on? Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 12:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Iron Law of Wikipedia? I just finished reading "Governance, Organization, and Democracy on the Internet" thanks to your userpage (Indiana University-Bloomington subscribes to Sociological Forum), and I was curious — have you made any further analyses based on WP:V since 2009? Nyttend (talk) 20:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC) I was thinking specifically about ANI while reading the section that noted that even the most active editors of WP:V commonly edit articles; seems like there are plenty of people who rarely go anywhere except ANI. It might be interesting to look at people who rarely go anywhere besides the reference desks, although I'd guess that the RD regulars are less affected by the law because of the very nature of the page. Thanks for the comments; my nearly-total lack of sociological experience means that I'd never heard of the Iron Law or of Michels before. Nyttend (talk) 22:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the pointer to the language-style research (yes, it's two weeks ago); how interesting. I'm amazed that they went through 4,000,000 comments! Talk about quantitative-based research...Nyttend (talk) 01:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC) March Wikipedia Education Program Meeting Please volunteer to lead the meeting! Leave a message if you can help. The March Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting will be on 21 March 2012 at 20:00 UTC. We will have updates from countries around the world and Ayush Khanna will present some results of data analysis he's done on students' contributions. Instructions for joining are on the page linked above. I hope you can join us on Wednesday! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription · Distributed via Global message delivery, 22:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Re: Occupy Pittsburgh restore, I see no AfD note on talk or in the article about a redirect-like deletion The small, 7,605 bytes stub was merged and redirected to its parent article per best practice.[4] What was deleted and why would you revert such a merge? Do you believe that a small stub on Occupy Pittsburgh is going to grow into a larger article? Viriditas (talk) 23:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Katyn Witaj Piotrze, dobrze zrozumiales, poprosze o przetlumaczenie , Serdecznosci Lonio17 (talk) 20:07, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Wielkie dzieki, nazwy juz zrobiłem,pozdrawiam Lonio17 (talk) 05:00, 17 March 2012 (UTC) Mam tylko dwie wąpliwe nazwy miast: Przemyśl i Juchnów w obwodzie smoleńskim. To nie jest ten w jest w obwodzie kaluskim i po polsku Juchnow. Proponuję zostawić z polską pisownią, serd. Lonio17 (talk) 11:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC) Witaj, poproszę o korektę [5]. Serdeczności z wiosennej W-wy, Lonio17 (talk) 11:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Komuś odbiło :)) Lonio17 (talk) 20:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Gdańsk article W artykule o Gdańsku, w rozdziałach o okresie międzywojennym, II wojnie światowej i okresie współczesnym, znalazłem rażące błędy i antypolskie tezy, które oznaczyłem szablonem {dubious}. Pierwszy dotyczy jakiegoś nalotu polskiego hydroplanu z Helu (!!!), drugi zaś tego, że po wojnie Gdańsk odbudowywano tak, by niemieckie zabytki, jako pozostałości "pruskiego barbarzyństwa" zniszczyć, co jest oczywistym fałszem. Nie mam czasu ani ochoty polemizować z naszymi "niemieckimi przyjaciółmi", ale wartoby to wyprostować. Pozdrawiam. belissarius (talk) 01:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 19 March 2012 News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas Featured content: Featured content on the upswing! Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting Technology report: Bugmeister to leave at end of May, but developers keen to "chart" a path ahead Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 14:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC) Failed assessment Please go read Talk:Medal "For the Liberation of Warsaw" Cheers! Fdutil (talk) 20:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC) Improvements or suggestions for Structuration theory Hello! My name is MJ. I have introduced myself on the Sociology WikiProject and I've seen your contributions and questions on the Anthony Giddens Talk page. I am eagerly seeking feedback on my large-scale changes to Structuration theory, which was pioneered by Giddens. I was hoping that you might take the time to look it over; I know you are a very busy Wikipedian (sp?), but you are so integral to the Sociology WikiProject, and your involvement leads me to believe that your advice would be very helpful. Structuration theory has been rated as "Highly Important" by the Sociology WikiProject, and I want to make sure that my explanation is coherent and comprehensive. Thank you for your time! Mjscheer (talk) 20:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC) Please help out at the Paid Editor Help page While not a huge backlog yet, we're getting to it on the a general backlog in the Request Edits category. If you could help in any of these sections (primarily the first four), I would be really grateful. This notification is going out to a number of Wikiproject Cooperation members in the hopes that we can clear out all of the noted sections. And feel free to respond to a section and help out even if someone else had already responded there. The more eyes we get on a specific request, the more sure we can be on the neutrality of implementing it. Thanks! SilverserenC 03:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC) DYK for Sejm of the Congress Poland DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC) Precious coverage of Polish themes Thank you for your profound coverage of Polish history, art, and especially people, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC) DYK for Sejm of the Duchy of Warsaw DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC) Talk:Constitution of May 3, 1791 (painting)/GA1 I've posted here and I'll await your responses. --Fang Aili talk 20:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC) Sorry about not being online the past few days. I'll take another look at this soon. --Fang Aili talk 23:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC) New article you may or may not be interested in Hello; I saw that you had worked on the Western Ukrainian nobility and invite you to contribute; perhaps you have Polish sources I don't have access to. Would the article be appropriate for Wikiproject Poland? Best,Faustian (talk ) 13:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012 Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM The Bugle is published by the [majestic titan] 02:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC) DYK nomination of Polish civilian camps in World War II Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ishtar456 (talk ) 04:43, 24 March 2012 (UTC) DYK for Piotr Skrzynecki DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:14, 25 March 2012 (UTC) Wikimedia Research Newsletter Hi Piotrus, I think Dario already notified you, and it seemed you may be taking a break, but just in case you could still find the opportunity to contribute within the next four hours, this paper seems in the social sciences category and could benefit from a reviewer with good knowledge of the community (it concerns the debates about flagged revisions). Any other help is appreciated as well - we are quite behind schedule this time. Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC) Ah, Njullien just added a review, this is kind of an awkward coincidence - feel free to expand it though, or to pick another item, there are still around 10 uncovered... Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 18:22, 26 March 2012 (UTC) Be careful on bio banners You just added a lot of WikiProject Biography banners to talk pages. You put living=yes in the banner when people were dead and sometimes put living=no when people were alive. Also, the living parameter comes before the class parameter. Bgwhite (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2012 (UTC) Problem was 90% of them were wrong, which goes beyond simple mistakes... I'm the king of mistakes, so I know how to make big and small ones. While you can put the living parameter in any order, it: a) Proper place is first b) helps us gnomes reading things better.... I look at the code and it helps my poor brain to figure things faster. Bgwhite (talk) 23:06, 26 March 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 26 March 2012 News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due. Technology report: A busy week: Git switchover, mobile site upgraded, and still time for three security releases Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 00:44, 27 March 2012 (UTC) could you strike part of your comment, please? Hi, on the Admins' noticeboard you said that a quote was by me when it was actually added by user 72.145.253.232. Would you mind striking it since it's not relevant? Malick78 (talk) 17:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC) Your opinion requested On this CfD discussion, similar to a previous discussion you participated in December: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_March_28#Category:Healthcare_by_country Thanks! --Karl.brown (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC) Help us develop better software! Thanks to all of you for commenting on the New Page Triage discussion; we're developing a new patrolling interface for new articles, and we want your input like never before :). So if you haven't already seen it, please go there, take a look at the screenshots and mockups and ideas, and add any comments or suggestions you might have to the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk ) 16:42, 30 March 2012 (UTC) Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677) Hello. I expanded an article about Justynian Szczytt (d. 1677). Could be now a B-Class article? Regards Kmicic (talk) 15:47, 31 March 2012 (UTC) WikiCup 2012 March newsletter We are over half way through the second round of this year's WikiCup and things are going well! Grapple X (submissions), of Pool B, is our highest overall scorer thanks to his prolific writings on television and film. In second place is Pool H's Cwmhiraeth (submissions), thanks primarily to work on biological articles, especially in marine biology and herpetology. Third place goes to Pool E's Casliber (submissions), who also writes primarily on biology (including ornithology and botany) and has already submitted two featured articles this round. Of the 63 contestants remaining, 15 (just under a quarter) have over 100 points this round. However, 25 are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly. 32 contestants, the top two from each pool and the 16 next-highest scorers, will advance to round 3. Congratulations to Matthewedwards (submissions), whose impressive File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg became the competition's first featured picture. Also, congratulations to 12george1 (submissions), who claimed good topic points, our first contestant this year to do so, for his work on Wikipedia:Featured topics/1982 Atlantic hurricane season. This leaves featured topics and featured portals as the only sources of points not yet utilised. However, as recent statistics from Miyagawa (submissions) show, no source has yet been utilised this competition to the same extent it has been previously! It has been observed that the backlogs at good article candidates are building up again. While the points for good article reviews will be remaining constant, any help that can be offered keeping the backlog down would be appreciated. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email ) 23:25, 31 March 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 02 April 2012 Interview: An introduction to movement roles Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case Technology report: Somewhere amongst the endless discussions about Gerrit lie details of hackathons, performance blips explained and more Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 07:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Łukasz Orbitowski The article reliable source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe deckertalk to me 02:52, 4 April 2012 (UTC) Thanks for adding a source! --joe deckertalk to me 04:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC) Doodle for April Wikipedia Education Program meeting Please leave your availability for the April Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting on this Doodle so we can find the best time for all of us. I also need a volunteer to lead the meeting! Will you help? Leave a message. It requires no advanced preparation, just the ability to welcome everyone and move us through the agenda. -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription · Distributed via Global message delivery, 20:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC) Dispute resolution survey Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Piotrus. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated DR goes to Wikimania! 12:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC) Rhodesiana Thanks for the review! Have expanded. Hope it's okay now. —Cliftonian (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC) Award Thank You for Award! Kmicic (talk) 23:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC) DYK nomination of Slavery in Poland Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Prioryman (talk ) 23:33, 5 April 2012 (UTC) Wikiproject proposal Hi Piotrus, I'm really excited about your Wikiproject fellowship proposal. I added another recent bit of research to the 'Previous Work' section... hope you don't mind. I would love to talk about this with you at length. I've been complaining to Siko about getting WMF serious about WikiProjects for a while, and am starting to see promising signs. Oh, and also your research question #4 is my dissertation topic :) Yeah, we definitely need to make this proposal happen. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. - J-Mo Talk to Me Email Me 03:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 6 Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Opole (administrative) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Kingdom of Poland Łukasz Orbitowski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Machina It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC) Constitution of May 3, 1791 (painting) No problem. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:13, 8 April 2012 (UTC) Hi Piotrus. I edited the prose, and I hope I didn't change the meaning of anything. Good luck with the GA review. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC) Stanisław Kania vs. the Nazis Howdy, Piotr! Since I saw [literally: I unfortunately don't understand Polish] you'd remarked on the Dyskusja:Główna Komisja Badania Zbrodni Niemieckich w Polsce page, it occurred to me - and not for the first time, though it's been a while - you're the go-to guy on some topics of mutual interest. So I'd appreciate your input on the matter I just raised at Talk:Stanisław Kania. I'm just now coming into contact with some source materials that may be relevant to expand Wikipedia articles, so I'm taking some initial steps to help make these more accessible. -- Deborahjay (talk) 16:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC) DYK for Opole (administrative) DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 09 April 2012 Wikidata: The next big thing? An interview with Wikidata Interview: Funds, fiduciaries, and the Foundation: the complex dynamics of scaling News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases Technology report: Next Wikimedia deployment already in the pipeline and details of recent performance improvements Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 00:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC) DYK for Slavery in Poland DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC) DYK for Byron Khun de Prorok Hi, you kindly suggested the aforementioned article be nominated for DYK. However the "process" is impossible for me to even begin. The page you sent me is absolutely incomprehensible to all but the most committed Wikipedian, I don't know where to even start, what to edit, where to write, who to ask, what to say, how to say it. Can you help Aetheling1125 16:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC) DYK for Łukasz Orbitowski nominate ) 08:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Haller's Blue Army There is an ongoing neutrality dispute regarding Haller's Blue Army. Users Faustian and Malik Shabazz are re-adding phrases that through discussion on the "Talk" page were deemed as inaccurate, and through consensus removed. When I deleted them, they are now accusing me of war editing, and threatening to block me. I also noted that the entire "Controversies" section is written in a bias language that unfairly sensationalizes the events in question, and characterizes the issue in black and white only. If it's not too much trouble I ask that a senior contributor like yourself look at the issue. --91.150.222.225 (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Look at the anon canvassing. This false claim of his about "re-adding text that was deemed inaccurate" is debunked, with links, here: [6]. VM and I worked out neutral wording we could all live with, and this guy has decided to try to change that through edit warring.Faustian (talk) 21:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Kleparów Hi there, it is difficult to find English sources for this article. I created the page because I saw Polish wiki does have an article. Since I don't read that language, could you please expand it more from translating the Polish wiki and add some sources. --SupernovaExplosion Talk 03:33, 12 April 2012 (UTC) TDYK Hi, Thank you for talk ) 19:31, 12 April 2012 (UTC) Staszek Lem's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. DYK for Serfdom in Poland DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC) DYK nomination of Revolutionary movement Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk ) 08:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 13 Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Baptism of Poland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver ) added a link pointing to Church Revolutionary movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to The West Sejmik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Inflanty Szlachta's privileges (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver ) added a link pointing to Warrant It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Can you help with a quick translation? Hi, Piotrus. :) I'm sorry to drop in on you with such short notice, but I'm hoping you can give me a quick hand. The Wikimedia Foundation wants to announce the new Terms of Use and would like to make the announcement to the Polish language projects in Polish. We've got a translation of the Terms themselves (meta:Terms_of_use/pl), but I need to get two sentences translated from English into Polish as quickly as possible. Since we've engaged so much in volunteer work, of course I thought of you. I was hoping maybe you could assist. The sentences are: Our updated Terms of Use will become effective on May 20th, 2012. Find out more. I think that this may be about right: Nasze zaktualizowane Warunki użytkowania wejdzie w życie 20 maja 2012 roku. Dowiedz się więcej. Is that okay, or is there a better way to say that? If you don't have time, or would prefer not to, please just let me know, and I'll track down somebody else. If we can get these done in time, we plan to make the announcements this weekend and will be able to actually change that date to the 15th. :) Hope all is well with you! --Moonriddengirl/Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 12:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Thank you very much, Piotrus! Next time I'll know where to go to get something translated in a hurry. I don't do much IRC but follow the basics. :D The Terms of Use you link at my talk page are the old Terms of Use, so I guess it's a good thing we're replacing them. If the issue is in the new ones, at meta:Terms_of_use/pl, you should be able to edit those, too. They may use an unfamiliar mechanism, though; they don't edit like regular wiki pages. At the top of the page, it says, This page is a translated version of a page Terms of use and the translation is 100% complete. If you see any issues, clicking on "translated version" will take you to an editable page. A weird editable page, if you're not used to it, but an editable page. :) --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 17:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Copyediting and removing of information I am sure it was incidental, but in your c/e of this section, where did the mention of 14th-15th centuries go? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 15:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC) The section title states the period over which the described changes took place, to which I refer in the replacement text. The elimination of prisoner-of-war slavery did not take place in the 14th and 15th centuries; it occurred gradually over the entire period. By the 14th century the conversion from captive slavery into hereditary serfdom was essentially complete, not only in Poland but over most of Christian Europe. Note that the article is similarly unclear with regard to peasant or villein (chłop pańszczyźniany) vs. yeoman or free tenant (wolny kmieć) terminology. A peasant, by definition, is a farmer who does not own his land, but is settled on his lord's land in exchange for corvée labor (pańszczyzna). A farmer who owns his land and is free to migrate is not a peasant. I suggest you start from this resource. Hope this helps. :-) Freederick (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Nomination of Association of Telehealth Service Providers for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Association of Telehealth Service Providers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Telehealth Service Providers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KarlB (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2012 (UTC) note i withdrew this nomination after further google searches. --KarlB (talk) 21:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Help with article for deletion discussion Peter, , The article Dimensional models of personality disordersis one written by a student in the APS Wikipedia Initiative (not from one of my classes). It is being considered for deletion on the grounds of lack of general notability. Although I am not an expert in Wikipedia policy, the topic seems notable to me, with lots of relevant scholarly and professional newsletter style references. Could you look this over and add your comments? As an ambassador, do you have any advice how the instructor or student should handle this? Thanks. Bob Kraut. Robertekraut (talk) 22:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 16 April 2012 Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren News and notes: French language outreach, WikiTravel debate, and HighBeam reloaded Discussion report: The future of pending changes WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals Arbitration report: Evidence submissions begin in Rich Farmbrough case, proposed decision in R&I Review Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20wmf01 hits first WMF wiki, understanding 20% time, and why this report cannot yet be a draft Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Your Content Review Medal The Content Review Medal of Merit   By order of the Featured Article Candidate reviews for the first quarter of 2012, I am delighted to award you this Content Review Medal. - Dank (push to talk ) 03:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Piotrus/Archive_40&oldid=1190141157"