Androgen deprivation therapy

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Androgen deprivation therapy
Differences between a healthy prostate and a prostate with a tumour
Other namesAndrogen suppression therapy
Specialtyoncology

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), also called androgen ablation therapy or androgen suppression therapy, is an

drugs or surgery, to prevent the prostate cancer cells from growing.[1] The pharmaceutical approaches include antiandrogens and chemical castration
.

Several studies have concluded that ADT has demonstrated benefit in patients with metastatic disease, and as an adjunct to radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced disease, as well as those with unfavorable intermediate-risk or high-risk localized disease. However, in patients with low-risk prostate cancer, ADT has demonstrated no survival advantage, and significant harm, such as impotence, diabetes and bone loss.[2][3][4][5][6]

The therapy can also eliminate cancer cells by inducing androgen deprivation-induced senescence.[7] Lowering androgen levels or stopping them from getting into prostate cancer cells often makes prostate cancer shrink or grow more slowly for a time. However, this treatment needs to be combined with radiation therapy (RT)[8] because ADT itself does not eradicate the cancer; it just decreases its aggressiveness.[9]

Types

Method based on surgery

It consists of removing the
androgens
are synthesized, of the cancer patient. It is the most radical treatment for ending the production of androgens. Moreover it is the easiest and least expensive one. The main disadvantage is that surgical castration is a permanent method.

Methods based on drugs

Testosterone synthesizing process
The synthesis of
LHRH agonists and antagonists, which both lower the amount of testosterone made by the testicles. They work by inhibiting the formation of LH in the pituitary gland. The LHRH agonists produce a sudden increase on levels of testosterone followed by a huge falling, process called flare, whereas LHRH antagonists decrease directly the amount of testosterone. LHRH agonists and antagonists used in androgen deprivation therapy include leuprorelin (leuprolide), goserelin, triptorelin, histrelin, buserelin, and degarelix
.
These drugs are injected under the skin achieving the same result as
surgical castration. Chemical castration may be preferred to surgical castration[citation needed
] as it keeps the testes intact.
Adrenal glands
were discovered as another center of androgen production even after a castration process. Therefore a complementary treatment was developed that uses antiandrogens to block the body's ability to use any androgens. Prostate cells contain an Androgen Receptor (AR), that when stimulated by androgens like testosterone, promotes growth and maintains prostatic differentiation. These pro-growth signals, however, can be problematic when they occur in a cancer cell. Antiandrogens can enter cells and prevent the binding of testosterone to the receptor proteins, due to their higher affinity for the Androgen Receptor.
The main antiandrogens are cyproterone acetate, flutamide, nilutamide, bicalutamide, and enzalutamide which are all administered in oral pill form.
New antiandrogens that target testosterone synthesis (
CRPC
.

Effects on men's sexuality

Normal male sexuality seems to depend upon very specific and complicated hormonal patterns that are not completely understood.[12] One study suggests that ADT can alter the hormonal balance necessary for male sexual activity. As men age, testosterone levels decrease by about 1% a year after age 30; however, it is important to determine whether low testosterone is due to normal aging, or to a disease, such as hypogonadism.[13] Testosterone plays a significant role in sexual functioning; therefore, naturally declining levels of testosterone can lead to reduction in normal sexual functioning. Further decreases in serum testosterone can have a negative impact on normal sexual function, leading to a decline in quality of life.[14]

Erectile dysfunction is not uncommon after radical prostatectomy and men who undergo ADT in addition to this are likely to show further decline in their ability to engage in penetrative intercourse, as well as their desire to do so.[13] A study looking at the differences of using GnRH-A (and androgen suppressant) or an orchiectomy report differences in sexual interest, the experience of erections, and the prevalence of participating in sexual activity. Men reporting no sexual interest increased from 27.6% to 63.6% after orchiectomy, and from 31.7% to 58.0% after GnRH-A; men who experienced no erections increased from 35.0% to 78.6%; and men who did not report engaging in sexual activity increased from 47.9% to 82.8% after orchiectomy and 45.0% to 80.2%.[14] This study suggests that the GnRH-A and orchiectomy had similar effects on sexual functioning. A vicious cycle whereby lowering testosterone levels leads to decreased sexual activity, which in turn cause both free and total testosterone levels to decline even further.[12] This demonstrates the importance of androgens for maintaining sexual structures and functions.[12][15]

Adverse effects

Although targeting the androgen axis has clear therapeutic benefit, its effectiveness is temporary, as prostate tumor cells adapt to survive and grow. The removal of androgens has been shown to activate epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), neuroendocrine transdifferentiation (NEtD) and cancer stem cell-like gene programs.[16]

  • EMT has established roles in promoting biological phenotypes associated with tumor progression (migration/invasion, tumor cell survival, cancer stem cell-like properties, resistance to radiation and chemotherapy) in multiple human cancer types.
  • NEtD in prostate cancer is associated with resistance to therapy, visceral metastasis, and aggressive disease.
  • Cancer Stem Cell phenotypes are associated with disease recurrence,
    Circulating tumor cells
    .

Thus, activation of these programs via inhibition of the androgen axis provides a mechanism by which tumor cells can adapt to promote disease recurrence and progression.[11]

Orchiectomy, LHRH analogs and LHRH antagonists can all cause similar side effects, due to changes in the levels of sex hormones (testosterone).[17]

A program has been developed for patients and their partners to recognize and manage the more burdensome side effects of androgen deprivation therapy. One program is built around the 2014 book "Androgen Deprivation Therapy: An Essential Guide for Prostate Cancer Patients and Their Loved Ones", which is endorsed by the Canadian Urological Association.[18]

Recent studies have shown ADT may increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease or dementia.

physical exercise and a "Mediterranean diet", among others.[21]
There is an additional small risk of cardiac arrhythmias.

See also

References

  1. PMID 17387371
    .
  2. ^ "Prostate Cancer is Focus of 2 Studies, Commentary". JAMA Internal Medicine, Media Releases. July 14, 2014.
  3. PMID 25023796
    .
  4. .
  5. .
  6. ^ ANAHAD O'CONNOR (July 14, 2014). "Study Discounts Testosterone Therapy for Early Prostate Cancer". New York Times. There are so many side effects associated with this therapy, and really little evidence to support its use," said Dr. Grace L. Lu-Yao, a researcher at the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and the lead author of the report, published on Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine. "I would say that for the majority of patients with localized prostate cancer, this is not a good option.
  7. PMID 23840802
    .
  8. ^ Science Daily
  9. ^ Prostate Cancer Guide
  10. ^
    PMID 25566507
    .
  11. ^ .
  12. ^ a b (2012). Testosterone therapy: Key to male vitality? Retrieved from: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/testosterone-therapy/MC00030
  13. ^
    PMID 16014598
    .
  14. ^ "Testosterone Deficiency". Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  15. PMID 28145883
    .
  16. ^ Medline Abstract
  17. ^ LIFEonADT
  18. PMID 31268539
    .
  19. .
  20. ^ .
  21. .
  22. . For cognitive decline, although authors offer a biologically-sound rationale for the development of cognitive impairment on ADT, many of the studies are small, methodologically flawed, but hypothesis provoking. They do not form a body of work that can independently support a conclusion or change in practice.