Resonant trans-Neptunian object
|
In astronomy, a resonant trans-Neptunian object is a trans-Neptunian object (TNO) in mean-motion orbital resonance with Neptune. The orbital periods of the resonant objects are in a simple integer relations with the period of Neptune, e.g. 1:2, 2:3, etc. Resonant TNOs can be either part of the main Kuiper belt population, or the more distant scattered disc population.[1]
Distribution
The diagram illustrates the distribution of the known trans-Neptunian objects. Resonant objects are plotted in red. Orbital resonances with Neptune are marked with vertical bars: 1:1 marks the position of Neptune's orbit and its trojans; 2:3 marks the orbit of Pluto and plutinos; and 1:2, 2:5, etc. mark a number of smaller families. The designation 2:3 or 3:2 both refer to the same resonance for TNOs. There is no ambiguity, because TNOs have, by definition, periods longer than Neptune's. The usage depends on the author and the field of research.
Origin
Detailed analytical and numerical studies of Neptune's resonances have shown that the objects must have a relatively precise range of energies.
Known populations
1:1 resonance (Neptune trojans, period ~164.8 years)
A few objects have been discovered following orbits with semi-major axes similar to that of Neptune, near the
- Leading Trojans at L4
- 385571 Otrera
- 385695 Clete
- (527604) 2007 VL305
- (530930) 2011 WG157
- 2001 QR322
- 2005 TN53
- 2006 RJ103
- 2010 TS191
- 2010 TT191
- 2012 UV177
- 2013 RL124
- 2013 TZ187
- 2013 VX30
- 2014 QO441
- 2014 QP441
- 2014 RO74
- 2014 SC374
- 2014 UU240
- 2015 RW277
- 2015 VV165
- 2015 VW165
- 2015 VX165
- Following Trojans at L5
- (530664) 2011 SO277
- 2008 LC18
- 2011 HM102
- 2012 UD185
- 2013 KY18 ?
2:3 resonance ("plutinos", period ~247.94 years)
The 2:3 resonance at 39.4 AU is by far the dominant category among the resonant objects. As of February 2020, it includes 383 confirmed and 99 possible member bodies (such as (175113) 2004 PF115).[6] Of these 383 confirmed plutinos, 338 have their orbits secured in simulations run by the Deep Ecliptic Survey.[7] The objects following orbits in this resonance are named plutinos after Pluto, the first such body discovered. Large, numbered plutinos include:
- 134340 Pluto
- 90482 Orcus
- (208996) 2003 AZ84
- (455502) 2003 UZ413
- (84922) 2003 VS2
- 28978 Ixion
- (84719) 2002 VR128
- (469372) 2001 QF298
- 38628 Huya
- (33340) 1998 VG44
- (15789) 1993 SC
- (444745) 2007 JF43
- (469421) 2001 XD255
- (120216) 2004 EW95
- 47171 Lempo
- (504555) 2008 SO266
- (307463) 2002 VU130
- (55638) 2002 VE95
- (450265) 2003 WU172
- (469987) 2006 HJ123
- (508823) 2001 RX143
- (469704) 2005 EZ296
3:5 resonance (period ~275 years)
As of February 2020, 47 objects are confirmed to be in a 3:5 orbital resonance with Neptune at 42.5 AU. Among the numbered objects there are:[7][6]
- (15809) 1994 JS
- (149349) 2002 VA131
- (434709) 2006 CJ69
- (469420) 2001 XP254
- (469584) 2003 YW179
- (470523) 2008 CS190
- (503883) 2001 QF331
- (523677) 2013 UF15
- (523688) 2014 DK143
- (523731) 2014 OK394
- (523743) 2014 TA86
- (530839) 2011 UK411
- (531683) 2012 UC178
- (534074) 2014 QZ441
- (534314) 2014 SJ349
4:7 resonance (period ~290 years)
Another population of objects is orbiting the Sun at 43.7 AU (in the midst of the classical objects). The objects are rather small (with two exceptions, H>6) and most of them follow orbits close to the ecliptic.[7] As of February 2020[update], 55 4:7-resonant objects have had their orbits secured by the Deep Ecliptic Survey.[6][7] Objects with well established orbits include:[7]
- (119956) 2002 PA149
- (119066) 2001 KJ76
- (135024) 2001 KO76
- (119070) 2001 KP77
- (181871) 1999 CO153
- (118378) 1999 HT11
- (118698) 2000 OY51
- 385446 Manwë
- (385527) 2004 OK14
- (500828) 2013 GR136
- (523742) 2014 TZ85
1:2 resonance ("twotinos", period ~330 years)
This resonance at 47.8 AU is often considered to be the
There are far fewer objects in this resonance than plutinos. Johnston's Archive counts 99 while simulations by the Deep Ecliptic Survey have confirmed 73 as of February 2020.[6][7] Long-term orbital integration shows that the 1:2 resonance is less stable than the 2:3 resonance; only 15% of the objects in 1:2 resonance were found to survive 4
Objects with well established orbits include (in order of the absolute magnitude):[6]
- (119979) 2002 WC19
- (308379) 2005 RS43
- (312645) 2010 EP65
- (26308) 1998 SM165
- (469505) 2003 FE128
- (495189) 2012 VR113
- (137295) 1999 RB216
- (500880) 2013 JJ64
- (20161) 1996 TR66
- (470083) 2006 SG369
- (130391) 2000 JG81
- (500877) 2013 JE64
2:5 resonance (period ~410 years)
There are 57 confirmed 2:5-resonant objects as of February 2020.[6][7]
Objects with well established orbits at 55.4 AU include:
- (495603) 2015 AM281
- (26375) 1999 DE9
- (143707) 2003 UY117
- (471172) 2010 JC80
- (471151) 2010 FD49
- 472235 Zhulong
- (119068) 2001 KC77
- (60621) 2000 FE8
- (38084) 1999 HB12
- (135571) 2002 GG32
- (69988) 1998 WA31
- (84522) 2002 TC302, dwarf candidate
1:3 resonance (period ~500 years)
Johnston's Archive counts 14 1:3-resonant objects as of February 2020 at 62.8 AU.[6] A dozen of these are secure according to the Deep Ecliptic Survey:[7]
- (136120) 2003 LG7
- (385607) 2005 EO297
- 2004 VU130
- 2006 QJ181
- 2006 SF369
- 2011 US411
- 2014 FX71
- 2015 BZ517?
- 2015 GA55
- 2015 KY173
- 2015 RA278
- 2015 RZ277?
- 2015 VM166
- 2015 VN166
Other resonances
As of February 2020, the following higher-order resonances are confirmed for a limited number of objects:[7]
Ratio | Semimajor AU |
Period years |
Count | Examples |
---|---|---|---|---|
4:5 | 35 | ~205 | 11 confirmed | (427581) 2003 QB92, (131697) 2001 XH255
|
3:4 | 36.5 | ~220 | 30 confirmed | (15836) 1995 DA2
|
5:8 | 41.1 | ~264 | 1 confirmed | (533398) 2014 GA54
|
7:12 | 43.1 | ~283 | 1 confirmed | 2015 RP278 |
5:9 | 44.5 | ~295 | 6 confirmed | (437915) 2002 GD32
|
6:11 | 45 | ~303 | 4 confirmed | (505477) 2013 UM15. (182294) 2001 KU76 is also likely.
|
5:11 | 51 | ~363 | 1 confirmed | 2013 RM109 |
4:9 | 52 | ~370 | 3 confirmed | (182397) 2001 QW297
|
3:7 | 53 | ~385 | 10 confirmed | (500882) 2013 JN64
|
5:12 | 54 | ~395 | 6 confirmed | (119878) 2002 CY224
|
3:8 | 57 | ~440 | 3 confirmed | (542258) 2013 AP183, 2014 UE228
|
4:11 | 59 | ~453 | 1 confirmed | (500879) 2013 JH64
|
4:13 | 66 | ~537 | 1 confirmed | 2009 DJ143 |
3:10 | 67 | ~549 | 2 confirmed | 225088 Gonggong |
2:7 | 70 | ~580 | 10 confirmed | (160148) 2001 KV76
|
3:11 | 72 | ~606 | 2 confirmed | 2014 UV224, 2013 AR183 |
1:4 | 76 | ~660 | 7 confirmed | 2003 LA7, 2011 UP411 |
5:21 | 78 | ~706 | 1 confirmed | (574372) 2010 JO179[12] |
2:9 | 80 | ~730 | 3 confirmed | (523794) 2015 RR245, 2003 UA414, 2018 VG18 |
1:5 | 88 | ~825 | 2 confirmed | 2007 FN51, 2011 BP170 |
2:11 | 94 | ~909 | 3 confirmed | 2005 RP43, 2011 HO60 |
1:6 | 99 | ~1000 | 2 confirmed | (528381) 2008 ST291, 2011 WJ157 |
1:9 | 129 | ~1500 | 2 confirmed | 2007 TC434, 2015 KE172 |
Haumea
Coincidental versus true resonances
One of the concerns is that weak resonances may exist and would be difficult to prove due to the current lack of accuracy in the orbits of these distant objects. Many objects have
Simulations by Emel'yanenko and Kiseleva in 2007 show that (131696) 2001 XT254 is librating in a 3:7 resonance with Neptune.[16] This libration can be stable for less than 100 million to billions of years.[16]
Emel'yanenko and Kiseleva also show that (48639) 1995 TL8 appears to have less than a 1% probability of being in a 3:7 resonance with Neptune, but it does execute circulations near this resonance.[16]
Toward a formal definition
The classes of TNO have no universally agreed precise definitions, the boundaries are often unclear and the notion of resonance is not defined precisely. The
In general, the mean-motion resonance may involve not only orbital periods of the form
where p and q are small integers, λ and λN are respectively the
An object is resonant if for some small integers (p,q,n,m,r,s), the argument (angle) defined below is librating (i.e. is bounded):[17]
where the are the longitudes of perihelia and the are the longitudes of the
The term libration denotes here periodic oscillation of the angle around some value and is opposed to circulation where the angle can take all values from 0 to 360°. For example, in the case of Pluto, the resonant angle librates around 180° with an amplitude of around 86.6° degrees, i.e. the angle changes periodically from 93.4° to 266.6°.[18]
All new plutinos discovered during the Deep Ecliptic Survey proved to be of the type
similar to Pluto's mean-motion resonance.
More generally, this 2:3 resonance is an example of the resonances p:(p+1) (for example 1:2, 2:3, 3:4) that have proved to lead to stable orbits.[4] Their resonant angle is
In this case, the importance of the resonant angle can be understood by noting that when the object is at perihelion, i.e. , then
i.e. gives a measure of the distance of the object's perihelion from Neptune.[4] The object is protected from the perturbation by keeping its perihelion far from Neptune provided librates around an angle far from 0°.
Classification methods
As the orbital elements are known with a limited precision, the uncertainties may lead to
References
- S2CID 14153557.
- S2CID 41919451. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 July 2018 – via the NASA Technical Report Server.
- S2CID 13928812.
- ^ S2CID 10622344 – via the Internet Archive.
- LCCN 99050922. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 August 2017 – via the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Johnston's Archive (27 December 2019). "List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects (and other outer solar system objects)".
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Buie, M. W. "The Deep Ecliptic Survey Object Classifications". Retrieved 9 November 2019.
- ^ "List Of Neptune Trojans". Minor Planet Center. 10 July 2017. Retrieved 4 August 2017.
- S2CID 118622987. (rotating frame)
- ^ S2CID 1764121.
- .
- .
- S2CID 8387493.
- Marc W. Buie (2008-06-25). "Orbit Fit and Astrometric record for 136108". Southwest Research Institute (Space Science Department). Archivedfrom the original on 2011-05-18. Retrieved 2008-10-02.
- ^ "Orbit and Astrometry for 136108". www.boulder.swri.edu. Retrieved 2020-07-14.
- ^ S2CID 122634598.
- ^ J. L. Elliot, S. D. Kern, K. B. Clancy, A. A. S. Gulbis, R. L. Millis, M. W. Buie, L. H. Wasserman, E. I. Chiang, A. B. Jordan, D. E. Trilling, and K. J. Meech The Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. II. Dynamical Classification, the Kuiper Belt Plane, and the Core Population. The Astronomical Journal, 129 (2006), pp. preprint Archived 2006-08-23 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Mark Buie (12 November 2019), Orbit Fit and Astrometric record for 134340, archived from the original on 11 November 2019
- ^ a b c d B. Gladman; B. Marsden; C. VanLaerhoven (2008). Nomenclature in the Outer Solar System. )
Further reading
- John K. Davies; Luis H. Barrera, eds. (2004-08-03). The First Decadal Review of the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt. Springer. ISBN 1-4020-1781-2.
- E. I. Chiang; J. R. Lovering; R. L. Millis; M. W. Buie; L. H. Wasserman & K. J. Meech (June 2003). "Resonant and Secular Families of the Kuiper Belt". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 92 (1–4). Springer Netherlands: 49–62. S2CID 189905712.
- E. I. Chiang; A. B. Jordan; R. L. Millis; M. W. Buie; L. H. Wasserman; J. L. Elliot; S. D. Kern; D. E. Trilling; K. J. Meech & R. M. Wagner (2003-01-21). "Resonance occupation in the Kuiper Belt: case examples of the 5:2 and trojan resonances". S2CID 54079935.
- Renu Malhotra. "The Kuiper Belt as a Debris Disk" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-10-22.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) (as HTML)