User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Previous discussions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This page lists previous discussions at

editors for deletion
.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The result was Ship to Australia in crate with
Love
 18:43, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Jmlk17

Too

WP:IDONTLIKEIT here; I'm a bit bitter that he was on WikiBreak when he was supposed to be nominating me for RfA. Delete or send to Australia immediately! GlassCobra
06:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete and send to Nashville for a BRC meetup. Then she can make more pr0n with EVula and teh undertoes. GlassCobra 18:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

LaraLove

She created this page. Thus she should be deleted, which would delete this page, which would mean she was never deleted. Which would mean she would then create this page. Which would mean she would be deleted. Which would mean that she would never create this page. Which would mean she would never be deleted. Damn. My

head hurts. I need to lie down... --Jayron32|talk|contribs
06:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The result was Delete per user request and self-outting.
Love
 04:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Marlith

Too much of a bad editor. His low quality contributions do not deserve to be included in the world's greatest encyclopedia. I propose that this editor be permanently removed from the project so he will not keep on forcing crap into Wikipedia.

T/C
16:18, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Speedy Delete for obvious gender issues and for defecting from the

greatest cabal ever. GlassCobra
00:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Dihydrogen Monoxide

Pick a name already! :P I was going to nominate this fine male specimen for being a stupid Australian; however, he has already admitted to being this. In lieu of this, I nominate Sir Giggy to be deleted for being too damn sexy for WP! GlassCobra 11:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Dihydrogen monoxide:

Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:

  • as an industrial solvent and coolant.
  • in nuclear power plants.
  • in the production of styrofoam.
  • as a fire retardant.
  • in many forms of cruel animal research.
  • in the distribution of pesticides. Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.
  • as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.
Not to mention that
Dihydrogen Monoxide
08:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Damn, I'll just fall on my arse again.
party
) 08:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete and Merge with
    T
    18:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Pink.
party
) 08:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete per

WP:ROUGE. If you don't like it, well...tough noogies. GlassCobra
00:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Jonathan

Moi? I can be deleted? *looks in preferences for a delete button* Nope. *looks in teh project namespace* Nope. Oh well, time for teh humor!

talk \ contribs
03:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

'Delete - Per U2. I know the boys. They said "Send this guy out to Where the Streets Have No Name. We cannot live With, but we can live Without, You." Keeper | 76 16:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • But I don't wanna change my birth certificate! :P
    Jonathan
     00:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Didn't give me a peanut //
    T
    18:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Me neither!! What's going on?   jj137 ♠ 03:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete in a rogue manner. —Animum (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete as a pre-emptive

sock strike; either Trusilver or Willy Wonka, we're not sure which. He also apparently looks like a sack of tomatoes. GlassCobra
01:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

F9T

Looks intriguing like my Aunt Helga, a sack of rotten tomatoes, but life goeth on. //

T
18:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Hahaaa, nice! GlassCobra 22:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Errr... typo fixed. :) Trusilver (talk) 23:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Aww...no fun. Well, Freudian slip at least? :P GlassCobra 02:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was :Delete and strip of all rights to the access of Cheetos on planet Earth, all socks will be removed from drawer and incinerated at Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory. And forever be branded a fool brander at reporting Vandalism //

T
20:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Trusilver

Believed to be using an army of several thousands of

T
17:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete for giving crappy ice cream. GlassCobra 09:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

DesertAngel

One of Trusilvers sock children, too many m's on edit history. Eater of

T
10:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete a billion times over. GlassCobra 09:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

John Carter

Locked up the whole Wiki for 10 mins just so he could be re-named, selfishness or what? //

T
17:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Keep because he finally joined the BRC. GlassCobra 09:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Pedro

User operates an army of obvious familial sockpuppets (

bitten more! GlassCobra
00:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Speedy Keep per blatant votecounting. kthxbai GlassCobra 22:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

WBOSITG

Appalling editor, posting twice on someones talk page just to get their edit count up [1] is a severe threat to The Game, as well as having a false name on their user page, with a misleading signature "weburiedousecretsinthegarden", does not seem logical, how can you bury secrets, and plus, why on earth would you put them in the friggin' garden, I could go on, but I really can't be bothered // Finns 10:46, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

Acting as an independent party and as an uninvolved admin, and using total discretion and objectivity, I'm closing this as Keeper. (I knew my username would come in handy). Actually, I'm closing this because E-man just gave away the result of yesterday's baseball game (that I haven't watched yet, and have been avoiding the radio/news so I can watch the recorded game later today). Grrr. E-man's a bastard. Keeper ǀ 76 17:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Do they have EFDRV here? =) –
talk
) 17:55, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Keeper76

Terrible speller, low-to-nil mainspace contribs, hosts lavish talk pages parties, demands barnstars, was sysopped in the most amazing display of sockpuppetry known to man (no consensus imo, clearly paid off the closing 'crat), barely any adminly actions. In short: the user displays zero merits except for an attractive sig. What more can I say? Delete please! Diffs provided on request. –

talk
) 16:59, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete, as nom. –
    talk
    )     17:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
    • I request diff's to back up your bold claims!--KojiDude (C) 03:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep per xeno. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 17:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - User says "Fuck" alot. A-Ok in my book. Qb | your 2 cents 17:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect - to AN/X... - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep per nom. All those are good things, what is wrong with you Xeno? Besides, Keeper gives out free beer... J.delanoygabsadds 17:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge with User:Pedro.--KojiDude (C) 17:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Procedural error. My talkpage, in large part to Xeno's incessant
    stalking, is undeletable, having more than 5000 edits. Oh, and I did have one mainspace edit yesterday, I'm clearly here for the right reasons. I mean reason. Keeper ǀ 76
    17:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Move to template-space - this user should be transcluded across a number of other editors. Many thanks, Gazimoff WriteRead 17:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. The project is running out of orange "new message" bars. The deletion of this editor would greatly help conserve the few we have left. Useight (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
    • We could just transwiki him to the Kinyarwanda wiki. I doubt they'll be running out of orange bars any time soon.--KojiDude (C) 17:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete agreeing with Useight. I've noticed a 56% drop in the orange bars on User talks Acalamari, Useight, Rudget, Pedro, and Jimbo Wales. Once Keeper76 is deleted, we can resume normal levels. KojiDude makes a good point too: anything worth saving can be merged with Pedro. Acalam | ari | what's in a name? 17:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
    • Would like a
      talk
      ) 17:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete awful taste in sports teams. TravellingCari 18:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
    • Are you sure about that? Keeping in mind that if Xeno is correct, and I have a 'crat in me-back pocket, and that if I go down, I'm taking my noms with me, do you perhaps need to reconsider your !!vote? And your sports team allegiances? Keeper ǀ 76 18:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
      • Weak Keep baseball fan, but I'll never change my allegiance. Also if we lose Keeper, there is no more Keeperpedia.  :) TravellingCari 18:55, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
        • There it is. The power of Greyskull at work...And keeperpedia will long outlive my time here. It is undeletable. Keeper ǀ 76 18:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
          • Bah, I urge you - do not bend to his idle rhetoric. He is a plague on the 'peedz. Off for a while =) –
            talk
            )             18:58, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
            • The Twins got hammered by the Yankees last night. cari should have to vote keep. Enigma message 17:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Makebot This editor should be given bot rights, as his discussion page is filling faster than the archive bot can cope with. --PaterMcFly (talk) 22:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
    • Ban for botabuse. Oh wait, that would be our fault, wouldn't it? Thank god baseball is back. TravellingCari 23:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Can I get a Number One meal with a large Coke, no ice? And can you break a 50?
    talk
    ) 02:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge With SlimVirgin and a comfy bed...Shapiros10 contact meMy work 12:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt with extreme prejudice User has admitted that he is the proxy for 500+ admins. He also did not deny the fact that he has a controlling interest in
    ArbCom. Finally, his userpage is demonstratively false, and his talk page gets about 15 times the edits mine does. I am also amenable to a merge with User:SockofPedro, but I'm afraid there isn't much in terms of salvageable material. Best wishes, Enigma message
    22:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Go easy on the salt, please. I am on a low sodium diet.
talk
) 01:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
What's with all this salt? Don't you know that sodium is bad for you... here, have a nice piece of celery... - Adolphus79 (talk) 02:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete — editor clearly exists; nothing else matters.  Frank  |  talk  17:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
  • With respect, your vote belongs in the Keep(er) section. Enigma message 17:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was delete and merge with User:Angela per my great rationale! My stash of socks The community has spoken, and this is the consensus. Why is it consensus? It is because I said so! Acalam | ari | what's in a name? 17:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Acalamari

This admin should be deleted: for starters, they only just archived their talk page yesterday, which means they let the size of their talk page grow to incredible lengths before archiving. Their userrights log shows that they've given waaaaay too many people rollback, and both them and their alternate account, User:Bellatrix Kerrigan, promote "Keeperpedia" and "WP:PEDRO". They also withdrew an RfB after four hours, and refuse to run again for now. Based on my evidence, I say delete the two accounts, and anything good can be merged with User:Angela. Acalam | ari | what's in a name? 15:55, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Say hello to my little friend! You've already done this, Marlith. No double-back-sies. GlassCobra 01:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Marlith 2

Violates DBAD and DDMP  

(Talk)
  15:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment, please note that I have made near 10000 contributors to Wikipedia.  
    (Talk)
          15:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Self-nomination=power hunger. bibliomaniac15 20:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep You seem nice. Maybe we can go jogging together. Shapiros10 contact meMy work 20:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep I think the nominator is feeling a bit of power hunger. A cool down block may cure him.
    talk
    )     00:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment But I made 10000 contributors!  
    (Talk)
          02:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment You have not made 10000 contributors unless you are a whore (get it?) Shapiros10 contact meMy work 20:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep I view self nominations as <insert Kurt-inspired word> evidence of nothing. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete — editor clearly exists; nothing else matters.  Frank  |  talk  23:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Who cares? GlassCobra 23:54, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Shapiros10

  • Criteria for which he meets deletion:
    • Uses
      Huggle
      thus meeting "Editor contributes at bot-like speeds."
    • He exists thus meeting "Existent user. User pages of users that do exist. (Check Special:Listusers.)"
    • He lives in
      notable
      ? No. Thus he meets "No indication of importance/significance. This is distinct from questions of notability, verifiability and reliability of sources."
    • He requested deletion:(Chat log collapsed)
Request for Deletion

Samuel Shapiros 

to me

show details 4:30 PM (9 minutes ago)


Reply


4:09 PM Samuel: hey 4:10 PM me: hey 

Samuel: how are you?
me: chatting with Ryan right now
Samuel: Cool
 me too
me: hangon
 im gonna set up group
 Can you open an EFD on me?
me: EFD?
 er
 what is that?

4:31 PM Samuel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GlassCobra/Editor_for_deletion 

me: ok...
 why?
Samuel: becuz it is lol
me: hehe
 lulz
 k then

4:32 PM Samuel: yeah 

me: stand by then
Samuel: gone
 i have to get off
me: bye

Thus meeting "Editor requests deletion, if requested in good faith, and provided the editor's only substantial contributions were unsubstantial."

  • Write out loud.
    talk
    )     00:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Say what?--Xp54321 (Hello! • Contribs) 02:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Oh you say Sharpiros not
talk
) 09:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
You're not allowed to bring those to my school. Hehe.--Xp54321 (Hello! • Contribs) 23:23, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Why, someone got hiiiiiiiiiiiigh off of me? Shapiros10 contact meMy work 23:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete — editor clearly exists; nothing else matters.  Frank  |  talk  23:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Rick James, bitch. Erik the

Red 2 ~~~~
01:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Frank

Editor clearly exists, nothing else matters. Erik the

Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR
) 22:19, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

And now that I'm back...I can say from personal experience that Vegas is an interesting place!  Frank  |  talk  00:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 00:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. —La Flutista (T•C•S)00:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per Flutista. —La Violinista (T•C•S)00:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per Violinista. —La Trombonista (T•C•S)00:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per excellent comments by all above. --Jimbo Walesista (talk) 00:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per obviously unrelated comments made above by every instrument other than the quite-playable kitchen sink. Bob the
    Green
    3
  • Delete per Bob the Green. Frank the
    Blue
    4
  • Delete per Frank the Blue. Fred the
    Orange
    5
  • Delete per Fred the Orange. Phil the
    Purple
    6
  • Delete per Phil the Purple, it takes a real man to name himself Phil the Purple. Joe the
    Brown
    7
  • Delete per Joe the Brown. Bill the
    Black
    8
  • Delete per above.
    God
  • Keep God is dead.
    Nietzche
  • Speedy Delete Nietzche is dead. God
  • Speedy Condemn the previous impostors. They can burn with Nietzche. God
  • Rick James, bitch
    Rick James
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was consume as a Double Ristretto Venti Half-Soy Nonfat Decaf Organic Chocolate Brownie Iced Vanilla Double-Shot Gingerbread Frappuccino Extra Hot With Foam Whipped Cream Upside Down Double Blended, One Sweet'N Low and One Nutrasweet, and Ice. bibliomaniac15 21:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Coffee

User is too weak. Has watered down IRC discussions on numerous occasions. User clearly isn't here to brew a nice encyclopedia. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Coffee is nasty, gross, and makes me want to throw-up. And don't even get me started on the drink, "coffee."
    talk
    )     20:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep and Trout Nom for Eternity Coffee>Jimbo. Shapiros10 contact meMy work 20:23, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep - this person belongs to the
    ark
    // 20:44, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Super Duper Uber Speedy Keep - I've known this user for over 16 years now... --
    omai
    // 20:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep - per me. --
    G
    // 23:30, 15 September 2050 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep - per below. --
    sock
    // 22:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep, obviously, there are several users, above, that want Coffee to stick around. Those accounts are so obviously unrelated, that I have no other recourse other than to agree with all of those separate and independent thinking individuals. Speedy keep! Keeper ǀ 76 20:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Nobody drinks coffee anymore.
    talk
    )     20:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Per IMatthew.
    talk
    )     20:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Per above.
    talk
    )     20:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete obviously, there are several users, above, that want Coffee to go away. Those accounts are so obviously unrelated, that I have no other recourse other than to agree with all of those separate and independent thinking individuals. Speedy delete! Keeper ǀ 76 21:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, give it some time Coffee is an acquired taste. Erik the
    Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR
    ) 21:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Earl Grey Gazimoff 21:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
    I move to strike Gazimoff's poorly reasoned rationale here. He's an obvious Brit, prejudiced against coffee in favor of "tea". Tea sucks.
    few or no other edits
    outside this topic.
  • Milk and two sugars. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Coffee is disgusting and the smell of it makes me sick... User:Coffee on the other hand should be speedy kept, because a) He uses IRC and b) He has a cool sig. Majorly talk 21:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Blong him. Don't ask me what Blonging means. bibliomaniac15 22:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Rename to Chetblong Has the name ever been used? I like the ring of it. Enigma message 00:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Fellow member of the "double gray slashes in their signature" Cabal. EVula // talk // ☯ // 00:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete — editor clearly exists; nothing else matters.  Frank  |  talk  01:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Drink Coat thoroughly with cream and add ginseng. Enigma message 22:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep Per Shapiros10, God[citation needed] of Wikipedia Shapiros ǀ 10 23:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Bad Keeper76! Bad! Shapiros10 // not a sock // ☯ // 23:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Freeze Anyone for iced coffee?
    talk
    ) 01:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Date: This user desperately needs to date. Then he can swap passwords and
    (Talk)
    15:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep You guys want to delete coffee? WHAT ARE YOU THINKING!!!!!! One thing the Book of Revelation forgot to mention is that Armageddon begins five hours, fourteen minutes, and thirty-seven point two five seconds after the last drop of coffee in the world is consumed. Do you really want that to happen? J.delanoygabsadds 02:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete – I haven't been nominated for deletion yet! D-: —Animum (talk) 00:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy DeleteChug or Merge with
    Willy on Wheels He has violated the three-your mama rule many times. See WP:3YR
    for more information.

Reporting him to WP:AN/3YR does not appear to have done much. SpecialK(KoЯn flakes) 09:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Excuse me??? I have not said your mama moar than 3 times yet... it was your mother who has said your mama more than 3 times... believe me I met your mom. --Coffee08 05:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Changed to Chug per Some Weird Guy. SpecialK(KoЯn flakes) 16:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
  • You know what I have to say to that? ... your mother. --
    ark
    // 06:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
  • You will never break the chain per Fleetwood Mac.
    erikthered2
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Strong Merge with Hannah Montana and a comfy bed. ;D GlassCobra 17:51, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

God no. bibliomaniac15 21:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

bibliomaniac15

Wikipedia's newest 'crat. Best off deleting him before he even gets started. We don't need a manic serving Wikipedia as a 'crat.

talk
) 01:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Oppose User demonstrates no need for being deleted. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:25, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment: User is obsessed with Miley Cyrus/Hannah Montana. (See edit count).
      talk
      )       01:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
      • Simply hung around those articles because they were prime camping spots for some vandal sniping. bibliomaniac15 01:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
        • Bibliomaniac15 is a 14 year-old girl? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
          • No she is a 15 year old girl. --
            ark
            // 06:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete there are too many 'crats. — Preceding
    Erik the Red 2 (talk • contribs
    )
  • Give a medal. Hero of the Wikipedian Union seems fitting. :)
  • Shibby --KojiDude (C) 01:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep and
    ark
    // 01:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete — editor clearly exists; nothing else matters.  Frank  |  talk  02:33, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Nominated a genius for adminship last year. Useight (talk) 04:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Smerge with Grawp. POV fork. - Icewedge (talk) 06:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Can't drive. Shapiros10 contact meMy work 11:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete -
    Scribe
     23:38, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - at least until he's done coaching me... then batter, deep fry, and serve with onion rings & slaw... mmm... - Adolphus79 (talk) 23:23, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
    • Funny that you should mention that. Last time I was EFD'd back before it was recreated people wanted to eat me...what's up with that? bibliomaniac15 23:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete
    I don't like what I don't understand, in fact it scares me, and this user is mysterious at least. JuJube (talk
    ) 09:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete The fewer other bureaucrats we have, the easier it will be for me to overthrow Wikipedia.
    Note that I'm willing to change my !!vote if bibliomaniac agrees to be one of my     minions. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:32, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
    • If you mean the "Bar-Code Thong Club," no. bibliomaniac15 22:34, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
      • The boxers would be acceptable, as would going commando if you're wearing a shirt. EVula // talk // ☯ // 00:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Shakedown for money -- Hey, he's a bureaucrat, and I hear they get paid extra!
    talk
    ) 01:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
    • Shakedown? How do you expect me to carry my billions of dollars in gold in my pocket? bibliomaniac15 04:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
      • Oh no, we don't expect you to use your pockets... it's somewhere in your signature isn't it? --
        ark
        // 12:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
        • I have no idea what you're talking about! Bibliomaniac15 20:06, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
            • He loves only gold...oooooooooonly gold...he loves oooooooonly goooooooold...oooooooonly gooooooooooooold...oh, sorry, I got a blood transfusion from
              talk
              ) 02:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
              • No, no actually we don't... and I had a blood transfusion with your mom, so... --
                ark
                // 06:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
                  • Oh, we're going to get into "Your mama" jokes? ==:O
                    talk
                    ) 12:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Arrest immediately for the murder of the Ians that came before him. Send to

Gitmo ASAP. GlassCobra
07:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Ian13

Deleted number of pages is almost above the editor's number of mainspace edits. Every recent mainspace edit has been a deletion tag or automated link remover for deletion. Created WikiProject Userboxes[3]. Once used a signature with a non-default font[4]. — Byeitical (talk · contribs) 09:37, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Done. Coffee swore; time to go home, everyone. GlassCobra 07:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

JuJube

Has changed names in the near past. Claims to go on Wikibreak and continues to edit. Is gay. Need I go on? JuJube (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was grind up into bits and feed to a landshark per

the relevant policy. —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed
01:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Gladys j cortez

Alright people, brand new admin! Let's make her sorry that she ever chose to elevate herself to a level above the sorry plebes! Wiki-chest jokes and contrived personality jabs will abound. :D GlassCobra 19:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Hurry, before she gets started deleting the main page and blocking Jimbo!!
    talk
    )     20:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Where do I start??? First, she is a new admin, which clearly means she is power hungry. Second, she makes Wiki-chest jokes. Third, she can apparently out-burp ANY guy. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Misery loves company :-P SoWhy 20:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Treadmill I want a new one. Gimme gimme gimme a treadmill at 5:30. Sam Blab 21:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • knock knock "Who is it?" "Uh...plumber." "I didn't call a plumber!" (pause) knock knock "Who is it?" "Candygram." "Candygram??!!?? No, I don't think so." (long pause) knock knock "Who IS it????" Landshark. "Oh, landshark? Well in that case, come on in..." (opens door) (loud scream) (piscine chomping noises) (silence). (Long, long pause) (sound of flippers schlupping along the hallway) knock knock.... (Please note: this editor has been speedy-deleted, per
    The remaining fragments of Gladys J Cortez
    22:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Hmm, well in that case...Delete per sheer gullibility. :P GlassCobra 23:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was recommend a psychologist to heal sex addiction. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

SRX

Propose merge to

T /C
19:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

I prefer SEX. :p--
X
 17:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, not a useful addition to the project. D.M.N. (talk) 15:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
    • I know I'm not =)--
      X
       17:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
      • Good. At least we agree. D.M.N. (talk) 18:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete — editor clearly exists; nothing else matters.  Frank  |  talk  19:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Soylent Green is peop--nom nom nom nom GlassCobra 07:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Animum

Hasn't been deleted yet, so really should be, therefore. Majorly talk 00:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Speedy gorge on waffles and maple syrup and listen to Bryan Adams for 17 hours on end per WP:SUMMEROF69, eh. (Non-manic-dictator closure) SpecialEH(KoЯn flakes with maple syrup) 12:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Xenocidic

Is Canadian, which means he is from Canadia. Enough said. Shapiros10 contact meMy work 01:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Strong keep We editors will no longer stand for Shapiros' constant need to eliminate editors that are 10x better than him! *Cue the riot!*
    talk
    )     01:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
RIOT!!!!! Shapiros10 contact meMy work 01:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
and here all this time I thought he was jealous only because AN/K is more active than AN/X... - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Needs moar lolcats. GlassCobra 17:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete for the sake of humanity before it's too late Discussion on this user is already underway at WP:Suspected Sockpuppets of Aspiring Bot Overlords, as his daily edit count proves he is a crazed, megalomaniacal WikiBot in disguise, bent on world domination... No human could edit that much in a day; he's a ruthless machine working to enslave Wikipedians everywhere, man! See also his post, two posts above mine, for evidence that he's in on it, right up there with SineBot, ClueBot, and SuggestBot. It's a conspiracy! They're all out to get us, man! The Truth will be revealed! SunDragon34 (talk) 04:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Okay, we're done here per Cat Stevens's law: once someone mentions Cat Stevens at any point at an EfD discussion, that discussion is over and can never ever be re-opened. Ever. GlassCobra 19:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Ecoleetage

User is not American, therefore doesn't like baseball, therefore violates a rule of WP:AN/K. (keeper76, I'm egging you on...) User has met Paris Hilton. Shapiros10 contact meMy work 20:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Uber strong delete per nominator's second point. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Deleting editors. That's hot. Keeper ǀ 76 20:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I met Paris when I was in L.A. the other week. I spoke with her for about 3-5 minutes. She was very pleasant and respectful. And she said I had a "sexy accent" (score one for Portugal).
talk
) 20:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Portugal and sexy accents ftl –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Meh. Paris thinks "Midwestern" is a sexy accent. Don't take it too personally, Eco. She was probably high as a kite. Keeper ǀ 76 20:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
America FTW! U-S-A! U-S-A! Oh crap Olympics are over. :'( Shapiros10 contact meMy work 20:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Shapiros10 is hot. Hotter than Paris hilton...Shapiros ǀ 10 20:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC) {{o rly}}
For the record, I didn't write that -- Keeper76 contact meMy work 20:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
If you guys want me, I'll be over in WikiProject Agriculture watching the pumpkins grow.
talk
) 21:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Huh? I'll be over in WikiProject Pornography getting pleasure from scantily clad females :P Shapiros10 contact meMy work 00:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Similarly, I'll be over at
WP:TROP watching the hurricanes churn up the ocean. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone
00:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Oh, I've not been deleted yet? Oh, while I am still here, allow me to whip out guitar and serenade you with some choice selections from the
talk
) 12:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Speedy bad-faith close. Two annoying pseudo-sock sprees (hint, people: not funny the first time, definitely not funny the eighteenth) and more Mac jokes than you can shake a stick at. That's all she wrote. GlassCobra 19:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

IMatthew

User contributes here User likes wrestling User's name is Matthew. Now be deleted n00b! Shapiros10 contact meMy work 23:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was I'm bored. Rename to Jumpin' Joe the Argonaut or something. GlassCobra 10:23, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Awww... but I didn't want this EfD to close yet... :( (Ha! JulianColton, you don't have a smiley for that do ya?! :D)- Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 05:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Jamesontai

Meh, after none of you guys took the hint... self-nomming for deletion.

Shoryuken generally gets someone's attention... :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 07:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Who wants to co-nom? :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs
07:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep: Hah! Take that, trying to delete yourself ;) Chamal talk 11:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Roll into a snowball and throw at approaching cars....THAT'll teach you not to try to delete yourself. —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 13:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Alternatively...Kill the animator which will make James disappear...easier than deleting. :D :D :D :D Either way, I don't care. :) —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 13:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Put in a space capsule and transwiki to Wookieepedia. Bon voyage, and may the force be with you. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 18:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Spongebob Squarepants Is there any porn in this store? Sam Blab 20:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Give him a gun to shoot himself It's faster than self-nominating for deletion. And the result is not subject to consensus ;-) SoWhy 21:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Rename to Jamesoncrack. Too good. Something must be fueling him... bibliomaniac15 02:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Dismember and feed to rabid chipmunks unless he reveals whether it's parsed as James On Tai; Jameson Tai; Ja, Me's On Tai; or whatever the hell.
    talk
    ) 03:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Meh... It's Jameson as in "Son of James", last name's Tai... :D I thought my signature made that clear already... :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 14:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Rename
    talk
    ) 00:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • LMAO! This is just hilarious... I wonder how many Democrats I'd piss off if I renamed myself to Joe-the-Plumber... although a better thing to do on their end would be to just cancel my membership to their party... :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 14:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Yeah I do... -_-; I edited Tropical Storm Fay article in August on WikiNews, don't know where that article went though... -_- - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 18:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was something. Any of you guys seen the movie Child Bride... bibliomaniac15 04:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Odd, since a) Am perfectly of the legal age to marry, b) That would list you as a perpetrator of a federal crime, trying to propose to me like that. Need a lawyer? —La Pianista (T•C•S) 04:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Who said I was talking about you? bibliomaniac15 04:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Then it should be "Child Groom".
Unless... —La Pianista (T•C•S
) 04:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Let's not go
there
.
*cuddles up to Biblio* But why, dearie? Can't you let Pianista insult you a little bit? *_* —La Pianista (T•C•S) 04:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
If I may quote Hobbes the Tiger: "I was beguiled by her feminine charms. Yow." bibliomaniac15 04:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Let's play
Calvinball. I am Calvin...you are the ball. —La Pianista (T•C•S
) 04:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Wait - I'm confused. Pianista, are you the transvestite now? —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 04:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
"No sport is less organized than Calvinball!" —La Pianista (T•C•S) 05:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Please don't pull The Crying Game on me. It will scar me for life. bibliomaniac15 05:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Um
WP:BEANS? —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs)
05:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn." —La Pianista (T•C•S) 05:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

La Pianista

This user deserves to be deleted after a completely bad-faith nom of moi. Just because I teased her for this edit does not mean that she has to get mad and nominate me for deletion.... Maybe she is trying to blackmail me into a spot on my Cabinet? :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 16:48, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Addendum: Editor is also a bear. —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 19:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Lock in a Room with Beach boys Records Help me, Rhonda! Sam Blab 18:43, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Goodness gracious, no. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 20:57, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Lock in a Room with Hannah Montana Get the best of Both Worlds!
    talk
    )     21:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Dear goodness gracious, no-way-in-heck no. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 21:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
    • BTW, where is Bibliomaniac? Isn't he supposed to be all over Hanny Montanny...? :D :D :D —La Pianista (T•C•S) 21:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
      • Marry me, Pianista, marry me. bibliomaniac15 05:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
        • AWWW what a romantic proposal! :D How cuuuute! Can I get an invitation to the wedding? When is it? Where is it? :P —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 14:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
          • Hey, Pianista, y'got a 'crat to propose to you. How can you say no? IceUnshattered [ t ] 21:17, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
            • Simple. He's a crat. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 01:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
              • You know, playing hard to get piques my interest even more. ;) bibliomaniac15 02:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
                • "Why do men like intelligent women? Because opposites attract." —La Pianista (T•C•S) 03:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
                  • I am smitten. As they say, love makes a fool of the wise. bibliomaniac15 04:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
  • (←) I am creeped. As they say, Biblio should have been deleted quite some time ago... —La Pianista (T•C•S) 16:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
    • -is creeped as well- Biblio x Pianista? -hides behind graphing calculator- IceUnshattered [ t ] 18:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete and enforce permanent ban from looking at LOLcats: Likez they picz 2 much. Iz gonna kill her dead 4 that. BTW, I'm not sure who Hannah Montana is, but I'd say she deserves that too. Chamal talk 13:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect to La Piñata Gazimoff 15:06, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge with
    talk
    ) 01:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep-Even teasing is stupid irresponsible and doesn't contribute to the Encyclopedia. Chubbennaitor 09:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Lock a in room with the Jonas Brothers Hey, you asked for it! LittleMountain5 13:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per --Icewedge (talk) 05:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Hey, I barely understand functions! -kills self- I

c; color:darkblue;">eUnshattered [ t ] 23:14, 29 October 2008 (UTC) What does that formula even mean?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?--68.192.47.94 (talk) 00:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

  • Usurp Jerry Lee Lewis, shake nerves and rattle brain. Goodness gracious...
    talk
    ) 05:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Really really strong support! Why should Lapinista be deleted she's one of my best friends!!! She hasn't done anything wrong! :D--Spittlespat 20:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Should not be deleted!!!She has made several edits and should be kept.--What!?Why?Who? (talk) 14:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
    • She could be deleted for the very same reason, you know, chéri. IceUnshattered [ t ] 22:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
      • :) agreed! DELETE HER ALREADY! :P —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 23:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
        • I didn't say that I wanted to delete her. I was merely stating a point which, frankly, wrecks WhatWhyWho's point. At the same time, I could wreck a bunch of other people's points, but I'm too busy staring at people on MSNBC/CNN ramble on about McCain, Obama (repeat that 368 times, then say "Nader"). Agreeing with my statement and wanting to delete La Pianista is not the same thing. -rubs hands together- IceUnshattered [ t ] 23:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
          • What are you people saying? I don't understand. All the more reason for deleting her. Chamal talk 14:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
            • Do not support deletion You teased La Pianista and then La Pianista nominated you for deletion. I find this awkward. Just tell her your opinion. You don`t need to nominate her for deletion. ♣PrincessClown♥ 23:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
              • Whoa, its all a joke...you can't delete editors! —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 23:42, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
                • (Princesse, chérie, we aren't honestly going to go do a Damnatio memoriae and nuke Pianista's userpage and talk page...) IceUnshattered [ t ] 23:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
                  • Lies, all lies, I tell you! Hey, I'd do anything for a support vote now... —La Pianista (T•C•S) 00:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
                    • Hey, "Lock in a Room with Beach boys Records" is a support - he's not trying to delete you, so it's a support. :P —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 02:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
                      • Meh. That's like saying "You haven't killed me yet, which means you want me to live." —La Pianista (T•C•S) 02:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
                        • Um isn't trying to delete La Pianista because of a small thing a bit......i dunno, weird? ♣PrincessClown♥ 23:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
    • (<-) Weird? Not at all! ♫♪ IceUnshattered [ t ] 23:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
      • No! It is evil. All the more reason to delete him and keep me. DELETE THE CAD ALREADY! —La Pianista (T•C•S) 18:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Obvious Delete for not winning the presidential race. Geez, how do you lose to an old geezer and some big-eared wishy-washy? GlassCobra 10:21, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

the ed17

User is attempting to run for president. Obviously power-hungry. :) —La Pianista (T•C•S) 03:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Addendum: Editor is also a jerk. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 22:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
LOL hey now.... :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 01:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete per inactivity. Hasn't even bothered to come here and defend himself. Bastard. GlassCobra 10:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Example

I have listed this user for deletion because:

  1. He/She/It exists, as proven by his/her/its edits.
  2. He/She/It does not exist, as proven by the discussion(s) on his/her/its talk page.
  3. Due to the aforementioned contradictions, this user apparently serves no purpose but to confuse and distract our editors from doing something
    actually useful. Hence, this existing nonexistent user must be deleted to maintain consensus. —La Pianista (T•C•S
    ) 22:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Don't know what he/she/it is, but he/she/it is most certainly not a vandal...yet. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 03:58, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Speedy Rename to something less pirate-y. Mauve is pretty good. GlassCobra 10:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Erik the Red 2

  • Speaks Portugese with a Scandinavian username. Sam Blab 21:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Norwegian is often called "Danish with a Swedish accent." :-P —Animum (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Baleeted. Come on, Fhqwagads. GlassCobra 15:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Juliancolton

Per this comment from IRC from the nominated user. JulianC93 wonders why he isn't at EFD yet.

talk
) 20:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

  • To close to my home. Toss him into the Nile River.
    talk
    )     20:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment what happens if he gathers strength and becomes a full-blown typhoon...? It'd make it harder to delete @ sea... —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 01:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
  • ZAP EMZ WIT DA SATELITEZ!! —La Pianista (T•C•S) 21:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Just throw him out of the Planetary boundary layer...oh, but then elevated convection comes into play. Curses! IceUnshattered [ t ] 22:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was I did it for the lulz. GlassCobra 10:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Matthewedwards

Matthew or Edward? Pick on or must be deleted. Also, who does he think he is taking over for The Rambling Man? Time to "Ramble" on about getting him deleted!

talk
) 19:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete as inferior to Kool-Aid. GlassCobra 17:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

CountyLemonade

I have checked all the criteria and it seems I'm eligible. Anyway, it looks like I've become rather disinterested in editing so I decided to give this a go-around. References are floating around somewhere -

L
— 23:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I'm not sure which scares me more, the fact that you've tasted Country Time or the fact that you've tasted cold pee. *shivers* davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 05:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • That still begs the questions: 1) How do you know and 2) how did you survive? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
  • WHOA! Thanks for the warning; now I know not to drink Mountain Dew for a while. :P --
    Sign!
    12:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Fail. Why was this never closed if the victim/nom withdrew? You guys suck. GlassCobra 17:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Dylan620

This time around, I am nominating... myself. As my account name implies, my name is Dylan and I am 620 years old. What?! What did you say?! --

Sign!
19:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Yes, that means you. Do you think you don't have to follow the same rules as everybody else? Who is your mother? Are you on drugs? Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Dear God, this is way too long. What the hell happened here? GlassCobra 10:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Bastique

Prime face evidence, as opposed to prima facie evidence. Clearly, attempting to eat an entire steak in one bite is power hunger.

The one, the only, Cary Bass himself. WMF big muckamuck. Nominating for deletion due to conflicted disinterest. Waaay too nice for such an uber role. Need to replace with Evil Henchman. DurovaCharge! 17:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

  • comment User is a
    talk
    22:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
    • Which gives us even more reason to delete. The user denies being a vegetarian, despite prime face evidence to the contrary in the form of a picture of them eating meat. Dendodge TalkContribs 22:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Force-feed Vegemite. Let's see just how Vegan he claims to be. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 22:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Better: Force-feed Soylent Green. Its green, so its vegan, right? :D —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 22:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Rename
    talk
    ) 04:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Cage with Chuck Norris. There's only enough room in the world for one badass. bibliomaniac15 04:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
    • In that case, Cage with La Pianista. Or Jennavecia. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 04:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
      • Mmm...catfight. I am strangely aroused. bibliomaniac15 04:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
        • I didn't think that could happen to a 'crat... —La Pianista (T•C•S) 04:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
          • Your fault for melting my heart of ice and penetrating my steely exterior. bibliomaniac15 04:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
            • "Steely exterior?" It was all mush and gush to me. I bet with all the money you 'crats make, you can afford bon-bons at every meal of the day. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 04:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
              • (e/c) DOWN, biblio...she's mine. :D :P —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 04:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
                • Ooh, a dogfight. I am strangely aroused. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 04:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
                • Edward, I challenge you to a duel! Only one of us is coming out of this alive! bibliomaniac15 04:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
                  • *Ed pwns biblio with his own weapon with one blow to the head. Fight ends/bell rings/Ed emerges victorious - and being gracious, he ignores the thumbs down and allows biblio to live. He then walks off into the sunset, Pianista on his arm.* (...as biblio is shut away in an ambulance and brought before ArbCom on the charge of attempted murder. =]) -transmission ends- Ouch. Not even a chance to fight back? :D :D :D —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 05:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
                    • Dishonorable conduct, you brigand! *Sheer light of biblio's awesomeness pwns Ed, who somehow melts into a quantum intangibility, even though biblio was going to let that guy live anyway (if he didn't want to live, his loss), proceeds to win simultaneous
                      wife carrying/kissing contest with Pianista without the Estonian carry, everyone lives happily ever after* bibliomaniac15
                      05:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
                      • Would you mind telling us how you escaped from Arkham ArbCom? I think that you may have just dreamed all of that... :) —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 14:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
                        • He snuck away whilst all the arbs were distracted by live feeds of the votes... l'aquatique[talk] 18:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
                          • -forces down vomit- This again, Pianista, Ed, Biblio? "Votes! Votes! For me! Oh, no!!! Come on, one more, and I'll be outta the negatives!" ...and Biblio, beaming, ran away to be crazy and all. You know, I had to pay 'em some money to get you in Arkham - get back there, or else I demand a refund. </weird, rambling randomness> Icy // ♫ 20:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
                            • Wait, so if I'm reading this right...Icy is on my side? What a weird day... :D —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 20:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
  • (<=) I'd rather be cut in two between you both than share a bed with the likes of you. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 23:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Depilate - I don't like goatees. //roux   editor review 18:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Lock in Bastille because that's the thing that comes to my mind whenever I read his username. l'aquatique[talk] 18:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
*Above vote indented and struck. Remarkable similarity in usernames indicates sockpuppetry. //roux   editor review 18:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Above comment also indented and struck- because I said so. l'aquatique[talk] 19:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
smilieAbove comment made prettier. //roux   editor review 19:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC)smilie
Above comment made 42.3% more amusing. l'aquatique[talk] 20:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
United NationsAbove comment boldly emboldened by my emboldening boldness. Dendodge TalkContribs 20:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
BOOM!Above comment posted under the auspices of the United Nations. //roux   editor review 20:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)BOOM!
MOOB 1...2...3...4...5...ni tcurtsed fles lliw tnrmmoc evobADendodge TalkContribs 20:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
˙˙˙ʎlpuǝıɹɟ-ɔıxǝlsʎp ǝpɐɯ ʇuǝɯɯoɔ ǝʌoqɐ l'aquatique || talk 22:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Above comment flipped. Dendodge TalkContribs 22:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Above comment made seizure-inducing. l'aquatique || talk 22:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Above comment commented out. l'aquatique || talk 22:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Above somment indented a bit too far. Dendodge TalkContribs 22:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Abuv commntz mayd clikibel. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Above comment made LOLcat-friendly. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 19:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Above comment shrunken. 19:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dendodge (talk • contribs)
Above comment unsigned. :P —La Pianista (T•C•S) 20:47, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Above comment made big ON WHEELS! Dendodge TalkContribs 20:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
*****Above** comment* *made*
Willy-friendly.*** —***La Pianista (T•C*•S
) 04:35, 6 *** December 2008 (UTC)***
L'annotation ci-dessous donné des pouvoirs magiques. Dendodge TalkContribs 08:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Aboveth commenth Frenchified (probableth incorrectlehy) l'aquatique || talk 10:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

(<-) AAAAA AAAAAAA AAA-AAAAA. AAA // A AA:AA, A AAAAAAAA AAAA (AAA)

♫ ♫ Above comment AAA-ified. Dendodge TalkContribs 15:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)♫ ♫
Above comment set to music. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 18:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Above comment now in monospace. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 18:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
18:39, plagiarized (T•C•S) :P comment La Pianista Above 2008 now . — 6 December (UTC)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Above comment shuffled. Dendodge TalkContribs 18:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bv cmmnt md th mst bnxs n Wkpd hstry. —L Pnst (T•C•S) 19:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Aoe oe eoi o oe eoe aoi 19:07, 6 eee 2008 (UTC)
. —L Pnst (T•C•S) 20:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

:::::::::Above comment made devoid of letters. '''[[User:Dendodge|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Den</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:red">dodge</em>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Dendodge|Talk]]</small><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Dendodge|Contribs]]</sup> 20:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

crossAbove comment made devoid of wiki-markup. Ooh, poor 'edian...cross —Le Jesus (asketh•and ye shall•receiveth) 20:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Star of DavidAbove comment converted to Christianity. Happy Hanukkah! || Shalom 00:10, 9 Kislev 5769 (UTC)Star of David
Above alien face Judaism. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 00:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Comrades! Above comment partially abducted by aliens, for make benefit great nation Wikipedia. Heil Jimbo! l'aquatique || talk 00:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
moose*munch* —La Pianista (T•C•S) 00:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
User:X!/FacepalmAbove comment fed to my pet moose. l'aquatique || talk 01:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
AbUv CoMent FasepaRmd
T /C
 01:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Above comment written by a 4-year-old. Dendodge TalkContribs 13:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
15943 3977365 692 98682 59 76 363940686 48339.
5 /3
 19:54, 7 33337534 2008 (753)
AbovecommentencodedsoonlyMI5canunderstandit.DendodgeTalkContribs20:29,7December2008(UTC)
Above comment failz at spacing.
matthew ✡
23:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Above comment epic failz as iz. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 23:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Aevb o om t en c m d a e mcro l o l uf. –ianJlunotclno rolTipca lconCye :0200 8, eebrcDme 8020 (CTU)
Above comment was caught up and jumbled in his "tropical cyclone". —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 17:04, 8 December 3008 (UTC)
ZAP! to the future. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
US FlagAbove comment hit by lightning.US Flag —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 19:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Above comment unindented and nominated for Vice President of the United States. l'aquatique || talk 21:01, 7 December 1941 (UTC)
Above comment sent back to the time of the attacks on Pearl Harbor. --
Sign!
17:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Bot close. If you notice an error, please consult

my creator. GlassBot
17:02, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Deskana

The user who does the forum shopping - every single flag other than Founder? That's got to be an evil vandal, speedy delete! (log for verification....) The Helpful One 18:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

  •  Bureaucrat note: Checkuser note: and Note: This user is ungrateful for me promoting him to admin [5]. This is a clear conflict of interest. It is him that should be deleted. I should be rewarded with the founder flag. --Deskana (talk) 18:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Lol, scroll down, and vote then ;) The Helpful One 18:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete Very very heinous user, all those flags, the shame! THE SHAME! MBisanz talk 18:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Clearly a False flag operation. Enigma message 18:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Granting one's self all those flags is prima facie evidence of power hunger. I would like to propose
    crushing by elephant for the execution method. J.delanoygabsadds
    18:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • SNOWball keep User is a human, not a bot. Check the logs for proof. Enigma message 19:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Sentence him to Ombudsman Commission. Bastique demandez 21:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete before she goes rogue and kills us all I almost nuked her account before the mean stewards stopped me. At least let us delete her :D - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 21:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Check... user? Check. //roux   editor review 21:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, obviously, because there is a conflict on this user's gender, however easy such conflict is to solve :P. And, user is obviously willing to exercise his power on us poar, poar mortals unfairly >:( Icy // ♫ 21:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Rename As
    talk
    ) 21:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Put the desk on a street.
    iMatthew
     21:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. Actually did this Stwalkerster [ talk ] 22:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Only standing crat qualified to make delicious subs.--Koji† 23:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
    • He makes stubs?
      iMatthew
       23:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep but must be required to change name to Mr. Deskana and display large picture of a bodybuilder on userpage to prevent further gender confusion. Also, recommend whoever demanded the removal of his flags be summarily deleted for having absolutely no sense of humor. l'aquatique[talk] 23:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Desysop, de-crat, de-checkuser, de-arbitrate, and most importantly De-skana, mostly because I cast this same !vote when this user was discussed on R's EfD page a year ago, and no one seems to remember it. (Either that, or you're all newbs!) Plus, I proposed a brilliantly worded motion last week on RfAr, and he opposed it. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
    • Aha! But under your plan, he still keeps his oversight bit, so this conversation would be prone to just...... disappear. J.delanoygabsadds 01:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
      • It would seem that my omission of Oversight was an oversight. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
        • But having oversight yourself, could you not just oversight your oversight of his oversight? J.delanoygabsadds 01:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
          • ^---A bleak reminder of what passes for humor on Wikipedia.--Koji† 01:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
            • Pipe down. Every time you mention that, 4chan huffs a kitten. bibliomaniac15 01:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Move to Cubicleana. Vacate the corner office. DurovaCharge! 01:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - user is obviously a power hungry, flag and power hording troll/sock, and should be deleted will haste. :)
    RockManQReview me
    02:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge to flag and use Jimbo's Delorean to send 'em back to the 1980s to join the Foundation for Law And Government. - Dravecky (talk) 06:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Was a bot for a couple of hours, but is now human again. We must take this time to strike, before his skin reverts back to an impenetrable metal. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per rouge botflaggery. How dare you have a sense of humor! The audacity! GlassCobra 23:24, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Definetely a bot Reallikeunreal 19:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. I always read the user name as "Desk Ana", which would seem to be some gal named Ana who works at a desk... but it's apparently actually a guy (no, not that one), so it gives me too much cognitive dissonance. *Dan T.* (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete per obvious

masochism. GlassCobra
10:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Thehelpfulone

Hello, my name is Van Dalism - here representing thousands of people in this world. I'm interested in helping out this kind man in order to prevent him from being attacked by my people (hell, by me!). He seems nice, and helpful - and the type that would fit into the White House to help out the new president. Oh - and if that doesn't work out for you, I hear McDonald's is hiring. "How may I help you?"

Van Dalism
01:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

I iz admin and diz is srsz buziness.. -> I accept the nomination :P The Helpful One 17:42, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete OMG A GIRL ON THE INTERNETS. GlassCobra 16:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Durova

Have we ever listed Durova for deletion? I think not. User exists which is prime-, no wait, prmia-, no...that's not it. I got it! ...which is prima-facie evidence of power huger.

(talk)
03:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

The nomination is an honor. I accept with gratitude. DurovaCharge! 03:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Invitation. Hey, we’re having a party over in WikiProject Agriculture – the lemon harvest just came in. And you what they say: when life hands you lemons, get out the vodka and tonic!
    talk
    ) 18:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
    • Aquí en California preferemos Tecate con limón y sal. DurovaCharge! 19:26, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm gonna have to vote stack, but...
    (talk)
    22:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete I submit to you: human have noses. Durova has a nose[citation needed]. Therefore, Durova is human. The idea of a... human running around with the bit scares me tremendously! l'aquatique[talk] 22:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, restore, salt, merge with Cat, nominate for adminship, support, oppose and redirect to Dog: Jimbo said so. Dendodge TalkContribs 22:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • 'Delete User is a girl, making her too cool for the internet. She clearly does not belong here. Thingg⊕⊗ 02:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
    • Zomgosh, I'm too cool for the internet... —La Pianista (T•C•S) 02:33, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
      • /me is too kool for skool! And the internet. l'aquatique[talk] 04:08, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

***Based on this sexism, I propose we delete thingg. After all wouldn't want any

(talk)
03:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete per being an obvious waste of life. GlassCobra 16:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

GlassCobra

HA! I've nominated the EfD keeper for deletion!! Cobras can't be made of glass!!! --Dylan620 (Home • yadda yadda yadda • Ooooohh!) 13:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

  • De-Glassify I think a plastic cobra would make a great children's toy! Sam Blab 13:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep and nominate the nominator for trying to get rid of GlassCobra in an attempt to take over this fine eating establishment. (Right?)
    iMatthew
     13:29, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  • That was fast --Dylan620 (Home • yadda yadda yadda • Ooooohh!) 13:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Eck, a snake. Merge with
    (talk)
    18:07, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Epic Fail - creating a silly and useless page such as EfD is primo facey that this user does not actually exist... - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Talk about Debbie Harry instead -- Glass Cobra? Hey, how about a "Heart of Glass": [6]?
    talk
    ) 20:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger Badger, Mushroom Mushroom... GlassCobra
    21:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  • The "Swiper, no swiping" quote above just begs me to ask just why you know that that is from Dora the Explorer... —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 18:33, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Some real genius must have concocted that song. So complex! GlassCobra 19:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Conditional keep Evaluations are still ongoing about whether carrying out this deletion would result in dividing by zero. If results favor not creating a black hole, delete. J.delanoygabsadds 21:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Hmm, good point. This will create a similar point as brought up in Lara's EFD back when this was in her userspace. GlassCobra 22:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Causual loops have always intrigued me. J.delanoygabsadds 22:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Yer mom did what? To who's monkey? - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Yer mom is GC's monkey. :P —La Pianista (T•C•S) 03:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
My mom has a monkey, what?? o_O GlassCobra 17:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Oh, sorry. A monkey has yer mom. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 19:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
HA-ha... a monkey has yer mom... a monkey has yer mom... wait... that doesn't make sense... - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Asp not what your wiki can do for you, asp what you can do for your wiki. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per
    procedure: fill out an order, sign in triplicate, send in, have it sent back, queried, lost, found, subjected to public enquiry, lost again, and finally buried in soft peat for three months and recycled as firelighters. Upon completion of the form, feed to the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal. //roux  
    18:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Ooh, shiny! /me gets distracted, ignores the RC queue --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Hadouken! GlassCobra 10:18, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism destroyer

User does not have a fast computer anymore. Unable to destroy vandalism. must be deleted without question, his computer destroyed, and assimilated into the borg collective. Resistance is futile VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 07:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

WAIT!
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was

Salt N Pepa (N Paprika). GlassCobra
18:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

PeterSymonds

User does not know the answer to the riddle, "What has 4 legs, 2 legs, and 3 legs?" So he must be deleted.

iMatthew
20:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete — editor clearly exists; nothing else matters.  Frank  |  talk  20:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Happy New Year. Where's the champagne? —La Pianista (T•C•S) 21:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
  • ...that the
    talk
    ) 21:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Promote directly to TfA. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 21:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Yeah, delete. I mean, everyone knows it's the four-two-and/or-three-legged zerathion! SoWhy 21:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Don't Salt - Has an unproven imposter that doesn't even know about the question. SchfiftyThree (talk!) 21:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Pepper Needs a little spice in his life. ;) Sam Blab 01:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep malformed nomination. The
    the nominator. PeterSymonds (talk
    ) 22:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
    • {{COI}} J.delanoygabsadds 00:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
      • PeterSymonds, your comment...it shows signs of starvation and it seems like you suffer from a lack of cookies and sunflower seeds. Shall I call in the
        iMatthew
         00:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
        • Depends...Do I get lunch, or paid? Or both? :) PeterSymonds (talk)
          • No....who do you think you are? Jimbo Wales or something?
            iMatthew
             01:00, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
            • Jimboship is no big deal. Why should he be more important than I am, mmm? PeterSymonds (talk) 01:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
              • Because he is from . . . . America. :O :P
                iMatthew
                 01:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Oh man... you don't know that answer? It's so easy, I'm not going to even type it here. I'll just leave it for someone else.... ;) Chamal talk 12:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
  • /me waves a '''Delete''' at PeterSymonds.. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 02:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, salt, rub with butter and roast at 350 for 1/2 hour plus 1/2 hour per pound. //roux   16:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was keep. No prejudice against adminbots; there has already been precedent anyway. bibliomaniac15 22:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

J.delanoy

Editor denies being a bot despite clear evidence to the contrary. Moreover, editor exhibits a sense of humor, which in direct conflict with his programming.--

otherlleft (talk
) 20:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

  • Note to closing admin editor: This user is also the subject of an EfD --GraemeL (talk) 21:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

--

otherlleft (talk
) 01:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

  • Well, there's always [8]. Just saying... Thingg⊕⊗ 01:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was FFS, someone close these. GlassCobra 16:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

RockManQ

Time for a cage match!

User claims to be a "Rock" and a "Q" at the same time. Also exists, and that is prime-face evidence of power hunger.

(talk)
03:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Heh, I prefer that
(talk)
03:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Hmm... now how did I make that mistake of typing "fluch" instead of "flush"? I suspect that an incapacitating agent was used against me... :P Chamal talk 12:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Some "incapacitating agent," alright... —La Pianista (T•C•S) 03:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

20% - Delete

talk
) 20:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC) Rogerchocodiles

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Force him to listen to pop music for 37 years, because I said so (actually, NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs) did... —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 23:11, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

TenPoundHammer and his otters

Those otters need to go. Not only do they trip you up when racing to help someone with {{

helpme}}, they tweak the code to always let TPH get the upper hand of the edit conflict. This user is just too quick. Suspected bot. Stwalkerster [ talk
 ] 21:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

  • You only have six otters? I was under the impression that there were more... GlassCobra 16:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Re-accessorize Oh, puh-leeze, people, otters are soooooooooo last year! Really, do you see Paris or Britney walking around with otters under their arms? We need some new zoological accessory that spells 2-0-0-9. Let me think for a minute...hmmm...hmmm. I've got it! Coming soon to an AfD page near you: Ten Pound Hammer and His King Cobras. It's a perfect image for TPH: macho, dangerous, powerful (that bad boy routine is money, trust me) -- and anyone who tries to save those articles TPH puts up for deletion will think twice when they see those
    talk
    ) 15:59, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Convert to 10-gram-hammer Ten pound are just tooo much. SoWhy 17:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • 10 Gram? As in Gram Parsons? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Gram Parsons has already been
    talk
    ) 19:21, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Grams and pounds are not convertible. Grams are a unit of mass, which is used to measure attitude. Pounds are a unit of force, used to measure banhammers, as in "I use 10-pound banhammers on routine vandals, but I drag out the 20-pounder for the recalcitrant ones." davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Reward User deserves it. Sam Blab 23:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Gazimoff

I just get the feeling he's begging to be listed here. :) Plus all the other reasons below, etc etc. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete per obvious dimension error.

talk
// 20:18, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

2D

User is obviously not two dimensional. The lie of the username plays a role in confusionifying everyone throughout teh wikis. Unable to CSD as a hoax due to lack of such criteria. 2DC 01:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. User is double-d-lightful. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 01:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete La Pianista for making a bad pun. She even admits it in her edit summary. --
    Sign!
    02:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
    • Epic fail. Already been deleted. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 04:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
      • Not a bad pun (well, sorta) - DD is my initials. 2DC 12:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
    • I'm sure there are all kinds of fun jokes that can be cracked about a girl making a double D comment, but that's too easy... GlassCobra 13:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Ponder 2D or not 2D? That is the question!
    talk
    ) 02:51, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Two-dimensional users are a very marginal minority on Wikipedia, having even less of them will only diminish our their cause.
    L
    — 04:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Convert to 3-D Come on, 2D is soooo yesterday! SoWhy 13:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
    • 3-D is sooo last month. How about 4D or 5D? I guess only the super-new nVidia card could be able to display me then, though. 2DC 15:13, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
    • Transwikify to 4D per above. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 13:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Clearly notable - 106,000,000 google hits. 2D helps to keep the people confusionified anyway. Chamal talk 14:37, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per uninformed nom. User IS two-dimensional, at least on my monitor. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 17:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep User is just text on the screen, which is decidedly two-dimensional. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Hospitalize. User's two-dimensional approach suggests a
    flat affect, which in this case is a clear sign of dimension dementia. Newyorkbrad (talk
    ) 17:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
*Struck above vote as clearly wrong based on the facts. If it's double-D, the last thing it would have is a flat affect. // roux   19:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
In turn, I struck the above vote for striking the vote above that. Remember, kids, two wrongs don't make a right...but three rights make a left.
talk
) 00:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
No, three
rights make a conservative coup. —La Pianista (T•C•S
) 00:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete to make room for merge with

matthew
 @ 15:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Closedmouth

Utterly ridiculous editor, insists on sparking confusion and is a key player in general incivility. Recently taunted me about my coherency, which many other editors have is good! It's simply not. Yes. —

neuro(talk)
00:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

"other users actually get off huggle when they see he's there" You just made my day. --Closedmouth (talk) 03:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • gasp* you're doing it on purpose? Chamal talk 04:09, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
(>.>) I've said too much. Away!!! --Closedmouth (talk) 13:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Punish for lying — Editor claims to speak languages but has a closed mouth. You cannot speak with a closed mouth! SoWhy 15:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
  • And what would the punishment be, SoWhy? --
    Sign!
    15:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Enroll in CPR training - He cannot be closedmouthed if he wants to learn
    talk
    ) 17:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Attempttoopenmouthify NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 02:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete all users making puns on my username It's the standard riposte of trolls and vandals, come on, be more creative. --Closedmouth (talk) 03:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Glue mouth together: The user is obviously lying, as they just spoke clearly, so their mouth should be glued shut in punishment. Plus, the user's name begins with C, so they are in violation of
    WP:C Dendodge TalkContribs
    12:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Don't care, like everyone else, obviously. GlassCobra 02:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

RyanCross

For bragging about not being deleted. Bragging about not being deleted is prima face evidence that you should be delete.

matthew
@ 15:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Speedy Salt N Pepa (N Paprika) PeterSymonds, and then eat Peter, and then merge Symonds with RyanCross, put Salt N Pepa (N Paprika) on Ryan, eat Ryan, and then merge Peter to Cross, to equal PeterCross (and eventually eat PeterCross at some point because Ryan and Peter are tasty). :) – RyanPublic (talk) 15:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per
    Ӝ
          15:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Per Ashbey.--
    800
     15:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per me. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 17:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Apprehend and turn over to the proper law enforcement agency For the unexplained disappearances of RyRy1, RyRy2, RyRy3 and RyRy4...and for trying to evade capture by pretending to be an
    talk
    ) 22:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Per Eco, Go tell Aunt Rhody. The old gray goose is dead. —La Pianista (T•C) 22:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Keep. That's not hot. GlassCobra 02:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Icewedge

For using complicated math formulas below, I don't need to get a headache when looking at this page.--

58
19:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

  • How do you know that, I mean clearly 2+2=5, I mean come on.--
    58
     20:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Merge with Bombay Sapphire, a hint of vermouth, and a single dash of orange bitters, shake and strain into a chilled martini glass. Add three olives. // roux   20:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
    • That would be illegal. That damn legal drinking age. Icewedge (talk) 00:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
      • Not for me, which is rather the point. Chin chin! // roux   08:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Ship to planet Venus. That's hot. —La Pianista (T•C) 20:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Why is everybody making sexual jokes on me? No, no. On second thought, Ship Dan T. to Pluto after frying in the Sun. It's not even a planet anymore. Boo-hoo. —La Pianista (T•C) 03:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Maybe they should use both salt and sand, like the way they deal with ice on northern highways? *Dan T.* (talk) 01:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Dig up Leon Trotsky and use this user to kill the commie again! (The user is something like an ice pick, isn't he?) *Dan T.* (talk) 01:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Merge with
    talk
    ) 21:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep don't delete my puppeteer! Without him I will be a limp, useless thing! PLZ NOO!!!!
    talk
    ) 19:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Rename into IcewedgeHugglesGoatse! bibliomaniac15 19:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Aaaaahhhhhhhhhh! no! no! no! no! no! Icewedge (talk) 19:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was crat fail = epic lulz. GlassCobra 01:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Balloonman

Needs popping. 'Nuff said. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 14:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Untie and use the helium to make my voice high so that I can say delete in a, quite frankly, hilarious manner. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 14:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Dissolve Cyclonenim and TenPoundHammer for obscure chemistry jokes. I just got back from visiting my family for the holidays and the last thing I want now is to hear my little brother's voice in my head when I'm on Wikipedia. *Nerds grumble grumble stupid science grumble grumble.* Graymornings(talk) 08:26, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Review completed. WP:NOTNOWWP:POPNOW. By the way, I typically take 4-6 seconds for my RFA reviews. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 05:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Fill with gemstones, swallow, smuggle into friendly nation. // roux   09:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Paint red, clone 98 times, get a camera and make a music video for 99 Red Balloonmen (and hope Nena doesn't sue for copyright infringement). I have spoken.
    talk
    ) 22:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Neun und neunzig Luftballonmenschen? // roux   04:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Baloo n a man? I'd be tempted to feed to Shere Khan but as the Brits here will know, Mr Kipling does make exceedingly good cakes. ϢereSpielChequers 15:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Fill him with water and have a water balloon fight. There. Problem solved.♣PrincessClown♥ 23:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Obsolete and outdated, therefore delete. I mean, you can buy these things from machines nowadays. Why go to "the balloonman" and embarras yourself.    SIS 
Because I think user:Condomman would be a violation of our user name policy?---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 23:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Pwnt. GlassCobra 01:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Cyclonenim

Per CED G5 or 8 (only through use of one of them would he have this ordered. Also CED E2 and 3. Quantumobserver (talk) 03:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete Choose a different weather phenomenon, cyclones are too broad.--
    800
     03:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete and nuke from orbit for using a complimicated legalese term in below EFD... Prima facie? May I remind you of
    WP:NLT! --Chasingsol(talk)
    03:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Hold !vote pending outcome of Turing test on candidate or alleged bot, or evidence he speaks a non-UK language on a non-UK wiki. Evidence of notability is here - if you've appeared on EFD other than by self-nom, you've been noted. If you appear here by self-nom and anyone but you and your socks !vote, you've been noted. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 04:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Kill by dusting with carbon black (per two of my former profs) for being a sockpuppet of Cyclone Norbert.
    talk
    ) 05:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Debug - User nominated a clearly crazy person for adminship which is prima facie evidence of an internal software error! SoWhat? 10:51, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Correction which is prima facie evidence of a full understanding of what it takes to be an administrator. There, that's better. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 16:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete and recreate with steward bit. GlassCobra 01:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

EVula

Sign!
03:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Don't you dare to insult my mistress!! SoWhy 10:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete until

toasters fly. Oh wait... GlassCobra
01:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

FlyingToaster

Per

WP:COPYVIO. User claims to be a Macintosh screensaver circa 1989. I prefer bagels, anyway. // roux  
07:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Shoot all those darned badgers too, while you're at it. Chamal talk 06:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Just drop it: All those badgers must have eaten him alive by now. It's no use us discussing this further. Chamal talk 06:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment - how did the badgers catch a flying toaster and eat it when it is made of metal? —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 06:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
They are very clever badgers. :P
talk
) 11:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
They were on teh 'shrooms. Duh. —La Pianista (T•C) 04:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For the last time, it's not a flying badger, just Mario in a raccoon suit. FlyingToaster 17:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Help! Now I have FLYING TOASTER WINGS running through my head! Enigma msg 17:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Send to Gitmo: Obviously these flying toasters can be used to avoid screening at airports, and used for terroristic purposes. also, 'toaster' is obviously a form of flying cylon, bent on bringing death to us all. The only logical solution is to send this skinjob to Gitmo. burnte (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete For denying that it's a flying badger. I will not stand for liars in such a serious discussion.--
    800
     00:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • never! she is an excellent person! toaster should stay!
    talk
    ) 21:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  • I must recuse myself from this !vote, on the grounds that I had this screen saver and still miss it.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - As any mac product is better than you bunch of badger-loving n00bs! :)
    talk
    ) 01:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

We don't need no stinkin' references

  1. ^ this drunk guy I met at the airport bar at 4am
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was:

Why isn't this closed
You people are such slackers
Now get with it. Srs.
—GlassCobra 01:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Newyorkbrad 2nd nomination

Someone had to do this eventually, I'm just doing the community a favor. Or

(talk)
05:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

  • And why is Texas the best out of the fifty, Pianista? That title belongs to
    Sign!
    13:15, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Shoot, you sound like a Coloradoan, buckaroo. Chunky homestyle chili with Texas beef 'n' beans beats New England clam chowder any day. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 16:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Yeah, right! Massachusetts is, and always will be, the best. TX and NY are good, but MA tops the list with scenic Boston, rolling countryside in the state's western portion, and also
    Sign!
    17:50, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
  • No state can beat Texas - our name means friendship, and it's our motto. Southern hospitality ftw! —La Pianista (T•C•S) 17:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Go Illinois, the most corrupt state in the union :P Woo!
(talk)
18:51, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
  • What about a compromise? RockManQ's favorite is
    Sign!
    19:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
  • ...That's the worst thing I've ever heard of since the turducken... —La Pianista (T•C•S) 19:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Turducken, Schmucken Hugh Fearlessly-Eatsitall did a seven bird roast recently, including shooting the Woodcock ϢereSpielChequers 22:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
  • OK, then. How about a battle of the states? RockManQ will be representing Illinois, Juliancolton will be representing New York, La Pianista will be representing Texas, and I will be representing Massachusetts. --
    Sign!
    19:32, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Since I'm representing Illinois and we had
    (talk)
    19:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
  • We have
    Sign!
    19:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

(out) Michigan wins easily, people - with the highest unemployment in the nation, we'd be able to raise the biggest militaia to crush you guys... Allanon ♠The Dark Druid♠ 20:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

You guys are all deluding yourselves. My state is the biggest, wildest, has the tallest mountain, the most lakes, trees, bears, moose, registered libertarians, longest coastline, we're the richest, most cultural, and we have a high degree of monopoly on corrupt politicians. Clearly, the best state is Alaska. l'aquatique || talk 20:13, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
The state that brought us Sarah Palin? Noooooo. "I can see Russia from my house!" Allanon ♠The Dark Druid♠ 20:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Sarah Palin is from Idaho. l'aquatique || talk 20:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Puh-lease - she moved to Alaska when she was an infant... trivial, trivial. Allanon ♠The Dark Druid♠ 20:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
I side with L'Aquatique. No one wants to be from the state that fathered this monstrosity. —La Pianista (T•C•S) 03:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Besides, regardless of my personal feelings about Sarah, she keeps life in the 49th state from ever approaching boring. l'aquatique || talk 05:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
(outdent) Okay, clearly you people need some straightening out. First, Texas is an automatic massive fail as pointed out by Pianista. Alaska is similarly disqualified for bringing one of the most clueless politicians in history to international prominence. Though I'm technically from Illinois, it is also unfortunately a fail, thanks to our stellar governor. The award goes to Massachusetts, hands down. Now stay on topic! :P This is about Brad, not which of our miserable states suck the most. GlassCobra 17:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
I will rhyme
Anytime
But haiku
I don't do
So I'm no Poe
But please don't curse
As my words go
From bad to verse
Newyorkbrad (talk) 07:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
You make bad puns
That's just horrible
Not as bad as Attila the Hun
But just as incorrigible.
—La Pianista (T•C) 04:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete per

WP:LOLFAKEPOLICYNAMESAREFUNNYEXCEPTNOTREALLYKBAI. GlassCobra
21:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Maddie!

Obvious, I need to be deleted. I meet G1 G3 E5 U2. Also I violate

WP:SOMEPOLICYTHATMAKESMADDIE!'SNOMINATIONONEFDLOOKEVENBETTERBUTREALLYTHISPOLICYDOESNTEXIST.--Maddie (formerly Ashbey)
21:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

That's illegal in most states.---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 01:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Your face is illegal in most states.... —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 01:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Well played.--
800
 01:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Five-to-one odds that this will turn into a bunch of "your mama" jokes.
talk
) 02:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Your mama is a bunch of your mama jokes. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Yo mama is so ugly when she tried to register they added her username the spam filter. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Yo mama is so fat that when she goes out wearing a yellow raincoat, people yell "Taxi!"
talk
) 03:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Yo mama is so fat that when she gets in the tub, the water level in the toilet rises. —La Pianista (T•C) 05:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Yo mama is so easy even a
caveman can do her. bibliomaniac15
05:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Your mama is so fat that when she goes for a walk, the whole world goes on an earthquake warning.--
800
 03:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Your mama is like a laundry mat, strangers walk up, hand over their money, dump their load, and walk away.---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 21:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Yo mama's so stupid she threw a rock at the ground and missed. Tou-freaking-che. Sam Blab 00:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Yo mama is so bow-legged that when she sits around the house, she really sits around the house. —Albatross 18:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Yo mama is so lame that when she tells Yo-Mama Jokes, it's indistinguishable from an administrative discussion on Wikipedia. —Gastrin Bombesin 18:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Close, user had a name change. He's clearly trying to evade deletion. GlassCobra 21:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Iamawesome800

Feel like I need to be deleted.--

800
23:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was blow up ClueBot, and ban J.delanoy so he can't take over the wiki. ♦ Maddie talk 19:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

ClueBot

Deleting possible helpfulness by ClueBot to version by vandal. False positive?

talk
 // 20:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - user has 783,870 contributions, which is prima facie evidence of editcountitis. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Beating me to a revert is clearly a foolish move. WHO HAS THE LAST LAUGH NOW, EH?! —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 22:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Blow It Up For it's stupid edits summaries "Reverting possible vandalism by
    800
    22:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as ClueBot does cause severe vandalize as shown in this example. So even if ClueBot makes good reverts, it's just trying to make it look like he's doing good, then it purposely vandalizes when nobody suspects it! Ooo, very sneak. You've been caught red-handed, and now you'll face the consequences of being deleted! — RyanCross (talk) 03:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
I second speedy deletion per this vandalism [9].--
Talk to Me
 03:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Sounds kinda kinky. GlassCobra 01:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Merge with Pepé Le Pew, Aquaman (ménage à trois, ooh la la) and a comfy bed. ;D GlassCobra 23:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

L'Aquatique

We've never deleted her, if my memory serves, so now is the perfect time. L'Aquatique has a very confusing, French, name. That right there is a perfect reason to delete. ;) VX!~~~ 21:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Comment - It's pretty dumb to use the computer in an aquatic environment. Either the name is a spoof, or she uses supernatural means to edit WP. —La Pianista (T•C) 21:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Fait le deletingness - bloody French. It's about time for some payback for 1066. // roux   22:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Supprimer, par mon incroyable logique (selon ma logique incroyable, crétin!). —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 22:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Slap with trout. Hasn't been around Portal:Fish/Quiz lately. bibliomaniac15 04:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Grab trout, fillet, slice into sushi - oh, sorry, wrong queue... // roux   09:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Eliminare. Questi francesi mi annoiano. Ciao SoWhy 10:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong delete L'Aquatique was the last person to support my RfA.[10] What took you so long? Also, I'm pretty sure that you're Sarah Palin. Exhibit A: You're from Alaska. Exhibit B: You claim to be "Sarai", but I think you just took the last letter of your first name and advanced it one letter in an effort to conceal your true identity. Nice try, Governor Palin. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 08:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - Just look at her username: not one but two Q's are trouble enough, but then there's that Apostrophe ('). We can't have editors whose usernames give homage to a subversive (just look at his first name), can we?  Frank  |  talk  12:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Dilute ϢereSpielChequers 13:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep: I like French girls. Wha? Wait a minute... user is "related to both George W. Bush and Barack Obama"???? Delete, delete and nuke. Or on second thoughts, maybe just delete; user is also related to a crime family so might be useful to Wikipedia later on. Chamal talk 14:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete, salt, oversight, remove backlinks, add to spam blacklist. How could you even consider making an edit like this? Have you no shame?!? Icewedge (talk) 19:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Merge with User:Vague for sexual identity purposes, and Mario Kart Wii Skill Improvement drive. - [Vague] 16:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was , as if any non-mathematician can understand what that means --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Casliber

Too many supports in the

ArbCom election. See here
. Beware of mind tricks, this user is a psychiatrist and will use mind control to establish consensus, as shown at the election by the alarming voter confidence. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 16:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Is this some hositility I'm sensing here? Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
There's a thin line between hostility and jealousy Casliber :) —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 21:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as stalker nominator. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 16:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as nominator.
    matthew
     @ 16:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as nominator. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as nominator. The Helpful One 16:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as nominator. VX!~~~ 16:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete Icewedge (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
    I think you meant to say —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 17:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Were significant parents in your lives specialists in mathematics or physics? Were they strict? Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Inane musical interlude Okay, everyone, sing along: "Casliber the friendly ghost, the friendliest ghost you know..."
    talk
    ) 17:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Erm...do you speak to dead people? Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Choose Life then! Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment if he's now on arbcom, does that mean this EFD will be open forever, I mean, that's how long it traditionally takes arbcom to decide anything... why should we be any different ;-)---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 15:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep per medication. I've just taken the pink tablets.    SIS  21:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per medication. I've just taken the green tablets.    SIS  21:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Neutral. Can I have a glass of water, please?    SIS  21:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Why Not?
    Chat, My contribs
    )     04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Maj o rly is majorly deleted. GlassCobra 21:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Majorly

I'm utterly appalled I've not been deleted yet! I majorly fail all policies, so I want to be deleted and be red like everyone else. Majorly talk 17:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Ah yes, that's my bad there, I should double check my links there :)--
800
 02:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • strong keep since he snapped late last year, he has come back with a vengeance and is worth his weight in salt...---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 06:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Question: Hmm... good point. What is your weight, Majorly? I'll vote depending on that (the !vote will probable be keep anyway, since your self nom clearly shows you want to be deleted). Chamal talk 10:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
    • How much money would Majorly's weight in salt be? Cause I'd sure love to buy him. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 22:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Icewedge (talk) 17:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Oh no you don't leave that math stuff for another place, not here.--
    58
     19:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Keep; Mr. 21655 neglected to mention that he is an

asteroid and therefore ineligible for deletion by this particular process. GlassCobra
21:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

21655

When in the course of

jettison
its more annoying or underproductive editors, and one in particular comes to mind when dealing with such a matter.

We hold the charges against Mr. 21655 to be self-evident:

  1. That he has chosen a username that makes no logical sense; 21655 himself has stated multiple times that his username has nothing to do with the
    Maryland city, among other things
    .
  2. That his temper is only somewhat milder than that of an enraged bull's.
  3. That he has styled this proposal in accordance with an American document, despite having said in the past that he is in fact Brazilian.

Such has been the patient sufferance of this community; and such is now the necessity to rid ourselves of this imbecile.

ταλκ/01ҁ
22:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was SNOW close obviously, but it would have been funnier if someone had actually closed this. Oh well. GlassCobra 22:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Michael Snow

User is the shoe polisher for Jimbo Wales chair of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. Obviously notable. not. SimonKSK 20:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Keep. He can haz admin now? GlassCobra 22:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Davidwr

Davidwr at work

Ok, I offered to nominate to RfA at the end last year, and he has yet to accept. If he isn't going to subject himself to that hell, I think he deserves to be deleted.---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 20:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep - bad faith nom, wants editor to throw himself under the wheels of a dumptruck RfA just to appease his desire to nominate people. :P —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 20:59, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Feed him cookies until he goes into a coma--
    Talk
     22:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Noooo, don't dele*NO CARRIER* — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidwr (talk • contribs) 22:49, 16 January 2009, funeral arrangements pending
Sorry, I had to pull the plug on you... can't have you defending yourself.---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 00:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • The letters W and R are so last year (or last fortnight). How about B and Z? Rename to Davidbz.--Maddie (formerly Ashbey) 01:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
    • The above vote is sponsored by the letters B and Z, and the number 4. *Dan T.* (talk) 22:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Community ban for confusing me with multiple emails, and serious canvassing concerns. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 16:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Force to become admin Seriously, that would be much more painful than deletion :-D SoWhy 22:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete with extreme prejudice Concur with Balloonman. Also, since he was the one who brought up the possibility of EfD in the first place, he is disrespecting a hallowed institution. Finally, RfA is a very pleasant experience. I would know better than anyone. David denying himself this opportunity clearly shows that he is not acting to serve his own
    rational self-interest. Delete until he reconsiders. Enigmamsg
    18:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy Abstain -
    talk
    ) 04:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Speedy abstinance???---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 23:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Indeed. Looks like the gene pool needs a little chlorine... —La Pianista (T•C) 23:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh my god it's my health teacher!--
Talk to Me
 00:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
o_O —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 00:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Send to Hell (or even Gaza): It'd be better than going through RfA, poor guy. Chamal talk 04:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Nom nom nom nom per nom —Scheinwerfermann T·C22:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
  • POISON With astatine XD. astatine-210 discovered elements ∞ what am I? 20:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Slow Delete One or two bytes at a time, so he feels it. Anybody who would successfully nominate me for the mop clearly does not have my or the encyclopedia's best interests at heart. - Dravecky (talk) 19:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
  • I guess all those people who opposed you should be nominated as Wikimedia Foundation board members, because they have the project's best interests at heart? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 21:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Insert deletion-related Doctor Who joke here. GlassCobra 22:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

The Doctor

For gallivanting around the universe, abandoning his responsibilities on Gallifrey,

failing to reach featured article status, and otherwise being a nuisance throughout the universe, and having the tenacity to leave his fate in our hands, I nominate The Doctor for Maximum Deletion. DELETE. DELETE. DELETE. P.S. Dibs on Bessie. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail
) 03:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

  • It less funny be with teh correct grammars. SoWhy 21:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Request for clarification: which incarnation is he? Delete if tenth, keep if fourth. Basie (talk) 21:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • How dare you delete the tenth! SoWhy 21:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep assuming he's among the first seven doctors, and maybe an exception can be made for the eighth, but beyond that...blah...exterminate. Acalamari 22:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep He'll only regenerate, so deletion is hopeless.--Koji† 01:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Keep, he's the master of mah puppet. ;D GlassCobra 22:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Master of Puppets

Is too helpful with new users and was crazy enough to help out a certain psychopathic user back in '07. Also is fond of too many pastimes and has confessed to being "the typical unsettled teenager with a mind that won't rest." Furthermore, user exists, prime meatface evidence of attention and power hunger. —La Pianista (T•C) 04:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Assassinate Probably too dangerous to this planet. Besides,
WP:IARWP:POLICIES ARE NOT YOUR OPINION SO WHY DO YOU KEEP SPAMMING THEM IN DELETION DISCUSSIONS FFS, and so forth. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D
04:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete Pigeon fail. GlassCobra 22:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Chamal N

Wrote an article about a pigeon. Must be deleted, due to aforementioned blatant evidence of

avian cabalistic connections. Get your SARS masks ready, ladies and gents. —La Pianista (T•C
) 06:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

My failures have caused a lot of raised eyebrows, but I'm innocent, really.... trust me.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Schlong'd. Sorry man. GlassCobra 22:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

SchfiftyThree

Girlfriend's Age = My I.Q. = 5 + 3 = an anti-vandalism bot. I absolutely think I should be deleted! SF3 (talk!) 02:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep His girlfriend is 8 yrs. old That is if my math is right :-)--
    Talk to Me
     02:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Wouldn't that equal Schweight? SF3 (talk!) 02:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete in form of math: (SchfiftyThree ÷ SchfiftyThree) − 1 = Schzero. ♦ Maddie talk 02:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Sympathy keep due to empathy with people who make lots of typoos, he obviously meant 50 + 3. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep: Liar! Bots can't think... can they? Chamal talk 00:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Schwam. Doo. Two and heif. Scheven. Schfourteen-teen. Schwenty one. Schwenty seven heif. 27, 37, what you say?? GlassCobra 14:10, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
I say...levitate, or ride a unicycle! SF3 (talk!) 04:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
A male organ. His name is Steve. WODUP (talk) 00:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Delete, clear COI input from brothers does not tip the scale. EFD is not a vote. GlassCobra 22:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

MiszaBot III

Archives too many talk pages, this must be stopped!--Giants27 TC 20:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete entire family as they all encourage laziness, which leads to complacency,which leads to decadence, which leads eventually to the downfall of society. We need to nip this in the bud people! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 23:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Hey, wait a minute... How do you know if a bot is a brother or a sister? Chamal talk 08:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Quick delete the family per Davidwr (talk · contribs). Preferably before Iran or Russia or China or Venezuela or some combination of the three leads to the downfall of society first. —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 03:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep the family but delete Misza13 You cannot punish the poor bots for the way their "dad" made them. SoWhy 09:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
    • I think the relationship there would be closer to God than father... J.delanoygabsadds 15:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose per J.delanoy. 99.36% of edits are to the User talk namespace. Absolutely no mainspace contributions. WODUP (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
    • :O the SHAME! Only 99.36? —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 03:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
      • That percentage is gonna hurt his rfa.--Giants27 TC 03:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
        • Yeah, definitely not high enough for my standards. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 16:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
          • At least it's not 100%. >_> SimonKSK 20:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete with extreme prejudice. With a name like Misza, this family just has to be Roooshian coming from a long line of Tchekists/ NKVD/SMERSH/KGB/Bolshoi ballet operatives. Nye ponemayu! Nitchevo! Davai davai rabotnik!--Goodmorningworld (talk) 02:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong keep as a useful bot that helps me to archive my talk page. As someone mentioned above, I too am lazy and don't manually archive my talk page. The whole family should also be kept, archive bots can be useful if you use them properly.--
    max999
    06:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Put him on SPEED so he'll SLOW down! An obvious sock of two powerhouses (

talk
20:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Versus22

Endless vandal fighter,

sock of ClueBot. →Dyl@n620
18:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

User:J.delanoy is also a sock of ClueBot. Okay15 Blah - What I've done 04:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete for spreading lies. There are way more than 22 verses. Also, hang for heresy. Killiondude (talk) 22:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Absolute, mandatory and irrevocable deletion. This person reverted an existentially profound edit on gladiator (page blanked), and now it's crawling with adjectives and words and stuff. Plus he's too fast. Haploidavey (talk) 14:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC). Well, bolding does it, can't hear my feeble thoughts with all the shouting around here. Haploidavey (talk) 15:52, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
    • Put him on SPEED so he'll SLOW down. Way too fast... Stop reverting at the same time as me :( And keep up the good work. Sephiroth storm (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Look at what I did! :D
talk
23:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Close, user has retired. GlassCobra 08:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Neurolysis

User is a disease. He will infect all users and, by altering their nerves, will make them his own personal zombies per his

sign
) 23:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Speedy Rename to something that rhymes so that NYB can write one of his famous haikus. GlassCobra 08:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Anonymous Dissident

User wants to be a

crat but is a dissident. As such, per definition, they oppose the current system. But if they are made part of the same system they oppose, that would lead to a catastrophic failure of the Wikiverse! Or so I guess, I am no wiki-physicist.... But I propose to delete this user per criteria E3 and U2 for editor deletion to make sure that cannot happen! SoWhy
10:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - User wants to be a bearcat buricrat bureaucrat, is clearly power hungry. –Juliancolton Talk · Review 13:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as he clearly has a passion for making IPs vandalize :P. Razorflame 14:43, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy Reheat without prejudice
 This editor-related discussion is a steak. You can help Wikipedia by grilling it.
—Scheinwerfermann T·C16:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Confusion IPs can change their username from their address to anonymous? Who knew?--Giants27 T/C 18:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Kung fu bouff! GlassCobra 08:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Yobot

Only edits talk pages, only uses Wikipedia as

myspace, suggest blocking I mean..... deletion.--Giants27 T/C
21:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Dude. Really? You would make that joke. :P —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 03:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. This user has been exceedingly useful to Wikipedia.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Speedy Double-Crosser Delete GlassCobra 08:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Headbomb

I've recently created

WP Physics
} 13:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was . GlassCobra 08:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Res2216firestar

Self-nom per

2216firestar
19:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Oops :"), didn't know where to put it.--
2216firestar
02:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
That's what she said. I'm so surprised nobody responded with that. Here of all places. -Killiondude (talk) 07:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Talk to Me
     20:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Douse with cold water - Who the heck decided to put a freaking star up for deletion. That burns even worse than an atomic bomb. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 04:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete, obviously... —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 12:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Now that I'm on
    talk
    ) 19:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete user name is far too silly. — Jake Wartenberg 16:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Orly?--
2216firestar
02:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Damn kids messed up my lawn. *scratches self and goes to take a nap* GlassCobra 08:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Razorflame

  • Force to jump into the River Seine as editor has evidently faltered and fallen. Quantumobserver (talk) 00:38, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Are you sure the editor isn't a vandalism reverting bot? All possible bots that claim to be editors need to be deleted. I'm surprised we havn't deleted him yet. ♦ Maddie talk 22:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
That's the end of your lawn, GlassCobra!
Comment: Forget Norfolk Southern, mess with a bigger conglomerate like
BNSF. Quantumobserver (talk
) 07:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

I am X!cited to announce that X! has been deleted. GlassCobra 19:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

X!

See here for X!'s self-nom. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 23:59, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

You are never done with algebra.... mwahahahahaaaa J.delanoygabsadds 01:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
*sobs uncontrollably* Shappy talk 03:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
... I didn't learn about factorials until pre-calculus... (X! · talk)  · @082  ·  00:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
In my school, we covered them in I think 4th grade. :) Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was keep per

WP:KEEP, and cook Fridae'sDoom in the sandbox. HeyMid (contributions
) 17:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Fridae'sDoom

This nomination has been done in the public interest. Whilst there is a strong case for calender reform to create twelve equally sized months each having five weeks of six days, (plus a few days for celebrations and recovering from celebrations). Freya is a sufficiently powerful goddess that she should continue to have her own day. Which other goddess is honoured by having so many promises to complete things by her day or has so many celebrations on her day?So without prejudice as to which of the other six days should be deleted instead, I propose that Fridae be protected from it's doom, but welcome input from the community as to the appropriate termination method. ϢereSpielChequers 08:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I plead the fifth. This is day-ism, in this case it's Fridae-ism! I want a lawyer!!!! Ғяіᴅaз'§Đøøм | Spare your time? 22:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
I am a lawyer. I'll be glad to help you upon receipt of my customary retainer fee. Newyorkbrad (talk) 09:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Fee? I ain't payin' no fee, you're all
communists, communists I say! Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм | Champagne?
06:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete - this user no longer bears a shred of sanity :S, I propose that they be terminated quickly and quietly. Ғяіᴅaз'§Đøøм | Spare your time? 07:31, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the
rant
). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

Bahamut0013

WP:EFD. WormTT · (talk
) 13:28, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Request permaban. Oh, I'm sorry, Wikipedia is restricted to Lawful evil rules lawyers. (Nice to see a plan work for a change.) Hekerui (talk) 21:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:GlassCobra/Editor_for_deletion/Previous_discussions&oldid=1138872177"